DOCSLIB.ORG

Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press UCLA Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press Title Kasapata and the Archaic Period of the Cuzco Valley Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/92s009cg ISBN 978-1-931745-34-5 Author Bauer, Brian S. Publication Date 2007-03-01 Data Availability The data associated with this publication are within the manuscript. Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California KASAPATA ANDKASAPATA THE ARCHAIC THE VALLEY OF CUZCO PERIOD lthough the Cuzco Valley of Peru is renowned for being the heartland of the Incas, little is known concerning its Apre-Inca inhabitants. Until recently it was widely believed that the first inhabitants of the Cuzco Valley were farmers who lived in scattered villages along the valley floor (ca. 1000 BC) and that there were no Archaic Period remains in the region. This perspective was challenged during a systematic survey of the valley, when numerous preceramic sites were found. Additional information came from excavations at the site of Kasapata, the largest preceramic site identified during the survey. It is now clear that the Cuzco Valley was inhabited, like many other regions of the Andes, soon after the retreat of the Pleistocene glaciers and that it supported thriving cultures of hunters and foragers for hundreds of generations before the advent of permanent settlements. This edited volume provides the first overview of the Archaic Period (9000 – 2200 BC) in the Cuzco Valley. The chapters include a detailed discussion of the distribution of Archaic sites in the valley as well as the result of excavations at the site of Kasapata. Separate chapters are dedicated to examining the lithics, human burials, faunal remains, and obsidian recovered at this remarkably well-preserved site. “This [volume] is the first substantial work on the preceramic occupation of the Cuzco region, and it will provide an invaluable set of research criteria for further studies. As such, the book breaks important new ground, and will be appealing to scholars who have an interest in related processes occurring in other parts of the Andean region. It will be the reference for guiding further research on the preceramic occupation of the Cuzco region.” – R. Alan Covey, Southern Methodist University BAUER ISBN-13: 978-1-931745-35-2 KASAPATA AND THE ARCHAIC PERIOD OF THE CUZCO VALLEY MONOGRAPHS Contributions in Field Research and Current Issues in Archaeological Method and Theory MO54 Advances in Titicaca Basin Archaeology - 1 Charles Stanish, Amanda B. Cohen, and Mark S. Aldenderfer MO53 Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes Richard Martin Reycraft MO52 Archaeological Research on the Islands of the Sun and Moon, Lake Titicaca, Charles Stanish and Brian S. Bauer (editors) Bolivia: Final Results from the Proyecto Tiksi Kjarka MO51 Maya Zooarchaeology: New Directions in Theory and Method Kitty F. Emery (editor) MO50 Settlement Archaeology and Political Economy at Tres Zapotes, Veracruz, Christopher A. Pool (editor) Mexico MO49 Perspectives on Ancient Maya Rural Complexity Gyles Iannone and Samuel V. Connell (editors) MO48 Yeki bud, yeki nabud : Essays on the archaeology of Iran in honor of William M. Naomi F. Miller and Kamyar Abdi (editors) Sumner MO47 Archaeology in the Borderlands : Investigation in Caucasia and Beyond Adam T. Smith and Karen S. Rubinson (editors) MO46 Domestic Ritual in Ancient Mesoamerica Patricia Plunket (editor) MO45 Pathways to Prismatic Blades Kenneth Hirth and Bradford Andrews (editors) MO44 Ceramic Production and Circulation in the Greater Southwest Donna M. Glowacki and Hector Neff (editors) MO43 Pottery of Postclassic Cholula, Mexico Geoffrey McCafferty MO42 Pompeian Households: An Analysis of the Material Culture Penelope M. Allison MO41 Rethinking Mycenaean Palaces: New Interpretations of an Old Idea Michael L. Galaty and William A. Parkinson (editors) MO40 Prehistory of Agriculture: New Experimental and Ethnographic Approaches Patricia C. Anderson (editor) MO39 Recent Advances in the Archaeology of the Northern Andes. In Memory of Augusto Oyuela-Caycedo and J. Scott Raymond (editors) Gerardo Reichel-Dolmatoff MO38 Approaches to the Historical Archaeology of Mexico, Central and South America Gasco, Greg Charles Smith, and Patricia Fournier-Garcia MO37 Hawaiian Adze Production and Distribution: Implications for the Development Barbara Lass of Chiefdoms MO36 New Light on Old Art: Recent Advances in Hunter-Gatherer Rock Art Research D. W. Whitley and L. L. Loendorf (editors) MO35 Pottery of Prehistoric Honduras: Regional Classification and Analysis J. S. Henderson and M. Beaudry-Corbett MO34 Settlement Archaeology of Cerro de las Mesas, Veracruz, Mexico Barbara Stark (editor) MO33 Girikihaciyan: A Halafian Site in Southeastern Turkey P. J. Watson and S. LeBlanc MO32 Western Pomo Prehistory: Excavations at Albion Head, Nightbirds’ Retreat and Thomas N. Layton Three Chop Village, Mendocino County, California MO31 Investigaciones Arqueológicos de la Costa Sur de Guatemala David S. Whitley and Marilyn P. Beaudry (editors) MO30 Archaeology of the Three Springs Valley, California. A Study in Functional Brian D. Dillon and Matthew A. Boxt Cultural History MO29 Obsidian Dates IV: A Compendium of Obsidian Hydration Readings from the Clement W. Meighan and Janet L. Scalise (editors) UCLA Obsidian Hydrastion Laboratory MO28 Archaeological Field Research in the Upper Mantaro, Peru, 1982-1983: Timothy Earle et al. (editors) Investigations of Inka Expansion and Exchange MO27 Andean Archaeology, Papers in Memory of Clifford Evans Ramiro Matos M., Solveig Turpin, Herbert Eling, Jr. (editors) MO26 Excavations at Mission San Antonio 1976-1978 Robert L. Hoover and Julio J. Costello (editors) MO25 Prehistoric Production and Exchange in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean A. Bernard Knapp and Tamara Stech (editors) MO24 Pots and Potters: Current Approaches in Ceramic Archaeology Prudence Rice MO23 Pictographs and Pegroglyphs of the Oregon Country, Part 2 J. Malcolm Loring and Louise Loring MO22 The Archaeology of Two Northern California Sites Delmer E. Sanburg, F. K. Mulligan, Joseph Chartkoff, and Kerry Chartkoff MO21 Pictographs and Petroglyphs of the Oregon Country, Part 1 Malcolm Loring and Louise Loring MO20 Messages from the Past: Studies in California Rock Art Clement W. Meighan (editor) MO19 Prehistoric Indian Rock Art: Issues and Concerns JoAnne Van Tilburg and Clement W. Meighan (editors) MO18 Studies in Cypriote Archaeology Jane C. Biers and David Soren MO17 Excavations in Northern Belize, Central America Raymond Sidrys MO16 Obsidian Dates III: A Compendium of Obsidian Hydration Determinations Clement Meighan and Glenn Russell Made at the UCLA Obsidian Hydration Laboratory MO15 Inland Chumash Archaeological Investigations David S. Whitley, E. L. McCann, and C. W. Clewlow, Jr. (editors) MO14 Papers in Cycladic Prehistory Jack L. Davis and John F. Cherry (editors) MO13 Archaeological Investigations at the Ring Brothers Site Complex, Thousand C. W. Clewlow, Jr., David S. Whitley and Ellen L. McCann Oaks, California (editors) MO12 The Running Springs Ranch Site: Archaeological Investigations at VEN-65 and Jack Prichett and Allen McIntyre VEN-261 MO11 The Archaeology of Oak Park, Ventura County, California C. William Clewlow, Jr. and David S. Whitley (editors) MO10 Rock Art of East Mexico and Central America: An Annotated Bibliography Matthias Strecker MO09 The Late Minoan I Destruction of Crete: Metal Groups and Stratigraphic Hara Georgiou Considerations MO08 Papers on the Economy and Architecture of the Ancient Maya Raymond Sidrys (editor) MO07 History and Prehistory at Grass Valley, Nevada C. W. Clewlow, Jr., Helen F. Wells, and Richard Ambro (editors) MO06 Obsidian Dates II: A Compendium of Obsidian Hydration Determinations C. W. Meighan and P. I. Vanderhoeven (editors) Made at the UCLA Obsidian Hydration Laboratory MO05 The Archaeology of Oak Park, Ventura County, California C. W. Clewlow, Jr., Allen Pastron, and Helen F. Wells (editors) MO04 Ethnoarchaeology Christopher B. Donnan, C. William Clewlow, Jr. MO03 Obsidian Dates I: A Compendium of the Obsidian Determinations Made at the Clement W. Meighan, Frank J. Findlow, Suzanne P. De Atley UCLA Obsidian Hydration Laboratory MO02 Chevelon Archaeological Research Project Fred T. Plog, James N. Hill, Dwight W. Read MO01 Investigation of a Late Prehistoric Complex in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, D.L. True San Diego County, California KASAPATA AND THE ARCHAIC PERIOD OF THE CUZCO VALLEY EDITED BY BRIAN S. BAUER WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY BRIAN S. BAUER RICHARD L. BURGER ROSA J. CORTEZ V. SUSAN D. DEFRANCE MICHAEL D. GLASCOCK BRADFORD JONES CYNTHIA KLINK RICHARD C. SUTTER C O T S E N I NSTITUTE OF A RCHAEOLOGY U NI V E R S I T Y O F C ALIFORNIA, L O S A NGELES THE COTSEN INStitUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY at UCLA is a research unit at the University of California, Los Angeles that promotes the comprehensive and interdisciplinary study of the human past. Established in 1973, the Cotsen Institute is a unique resource that provides an opportunity for faculty, staff, graduate students, research associates, volunteers and the general public to gather together in their explorations of ancient human societies. Former President and CEO of Neutrogena Corporation Lloyd E. Cotsen has been associated with UCLA for more than 30 years as a volunteer and donor and maintains a special interest in archaeology. Lloyd E. Cotsen has been an advisor and supporter of the Institute since 1980. In 1999, The UCLA Institute of Archaeology changed its name
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Reassessment on the Lithic Artefacts from the Earliest Human Occupations at Puente Rock Shelter, Ayacucho Valley, Peru
    Archaeological Discovery, 2021, 9, 91-112 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ad ISSN Online: 2331-1967 ISSN Print: 2331-1959 A Reassessment on the Lithic Artefacts from the Earliest Human Occupations at Puente Rock Shelter, Ayacucho Valley, Peru Juan Yataco Capcha1, Hugo G. Nami2, Wilmer Huiza1 1Archaeological and Anthropological of San Marcos University Museum, Lima, Perú 2Department of Geological Sciences, Laboratory of Geophysics “Daniel A. Valencio”, CONICET-IGEBA, FCEN, UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina How to cite this paper: Capcha, J. Y., Abstract Nami, H. G., & Huiza, W. (2021). A Reas- sessment on the Lithic Artefacts from the Richard “Scotty” MacNeish, between 1969 and 1972, led an international Earliest Human Occupations at Puente Rock team of archaeologists on the Ayacucho Archaeological-Botanical—Project in Shelter, Ayacucho Valley, Peru. Archaeo- the south-central highlands of Peru. Among several important archaeological logical Discovery, 9, 91-112. https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2021.92005 sites identified there, MacNeish and his team excavated the Puente rock shel- ter. As a part of an ongoing research program aimed to reassess the lithic re- Received: February 14, 2021 mains from this endeavor, we re-studied a sample by making diverse kinds of Accepted: March 22, 2021 morpho-technological analysis. The remains studied come from the lower Published: March 25, 2021 strata at Puente, where a radiocarbon assay from layer XIIA yielded a cali- Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and brated date of 10,190 to 9555 years BP that the present study identifies, vari- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. ous activities were carried out at the site, mainly related to manufacturing and This work is licensed under the Creative repairing unifacial and bifacial tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    Hafting and raw materials from animals. Guide to the identification of hafting traces on stone tools Veerle ROTS Prehistoric Archaeology Unit Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Geo-Institute Celestijnenlaan 200E (Pb: 02409), B-3001 Leuven, Heverlee (Belgique) [email protected] Rots V. 2008. – Hafting and raw materials from animals. Guide to the identification of hafting traces on stone tools. [DVD-ROM]1 . Anthropozoologica 43 (1): 43-66. ABSTRACT Stone tool hafting has been a widely discussed topic, but its identifica- tion on a prehistoric level has long been hampered. Given the organic nature of hafting arrangements, few remains are generally preserved. An overview is presented of animal materials that can be used for haft- ing stone tools, and examples are provided of preserved hafting arrangements made out of animal raw material. Based on the same principles as those determining the formation of use-wear traces on stone tools, it is argued that hafting traces are formed and can be iden- tified. The variables influencing the formation of hafting traces are KEY WORDS discussed. Specific wear patterns and trace attributes are provided for Stone tools, use-wear, different hafting arrangements that use animal raw material. It is hafting, concluded that the provided referential data allow for the identifi- wear pattern, experiments, cation of hafted stone tools on prehistoric sites and the identification animal raw material. of the hafting arrangement used. RÉSUMÉ Emmanchements et matières premières animales. Un guide pour l’identification des traces d’emmanchement sur des outils de pierre. Le sujet des emmanchements des outils de pierre a été largement discuté, mais leurs identifications à un niveau préhistorique ont longtemps été difficiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Pleistocene Cultures of South America
    206 Evolutionary Anthropology ARTICLES The Late Pleistocene Cultures of South America TOM D. DILLEHAY Important to an understanding of the first peopling of any continent is an Between 11,000 and 10,000 years understanding of human dispersion and adaptation and their archeological signa- ago, South America also witnessed tures. Until recently, the earliest archeological record of South America was viewed many of the changes seen as being uncritically as a uniform and unilinear development involving the intrusion of North typical of the Pleistocene period in American people who brought a founding cultural heritage, the fluted Clovis stone other parts of the world.5,9–11 These tool technology, and a big-game hunting tradition to the southern hemisphere changes include the use of coastal between 11,000 and 10,000 years ago.1–3 Biases in the history of research and the resources and related developments in agendas pursued in the archeology of the first Americans have played a major part marine technology, demographic con- in forming this perspective.4–6 centration in major river basins, and Despite enthusiastic acceptance of the Clovis model by a vast majority of the practice of modifying plant and 6–11 archeologists, several South American specialists have rejected it. They contend animal distributions. Others occur that the presence of archeological sites in Tierra del Fuego and other regions by at later, between 10,000 and 9,000 years least 11,000 to 10,500 years ago was simply insufficient time for even the fastest ago, and include most of the changes migration of North Americans to reach within only a few hundred years.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Society of America Special Papers
    Downloaded from specialpapers.gsapubs.org on October 1, 2010 Geological Society of America Special Papers Mining and Metallurgy in Ancient Perú Georg Petersen G. and William E. Brooks Geological Society of America Special Papers 2010;467;xvii-90 doi: 10.1130/2010.2467 Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Geological Society of America Special Papers Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes © 2010 Geological Society of America Downloaded from specialpapers.gsapubs.org on October 1, 2010 Mining and Metallurgy in Ancient Perú by Georg Petersen G.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Remains of Pot~ and Sweet Potato in Peru
    ir ! J.lJ tJ fJ DA TABAci ,~ RR INTERNATIONALPOTATOCENTER ISSN0256-8632 Vol.16,No.3,September1988 ljentroIntema~al d, la Pili Archaeological Remains of Pot~ 10 La MiltiRli.Lima 'i 1'\ f:"t! tnci'-o and Sweet Potato in Peru , :"r",1);I\- ii)-.'")~ Donald Ugent and Linda W. Peterson 1 RihHoterell-- .. I ~: ~ ~ I Fig. 1. Ruins of La: Centinela, situated on the south-central coast of Peru. This large administrative and ritual center served as the capital of the Chincha nation until it was conquered by an invading army of Inca warriors in t!te year A.D. 1476. Although this site remained populated for another S6 years, it was destroyed eventually by the Spanish conquistadores. Today, an abundance of cul- tural artifacts, animal bones, and plant remains lie exposed in middens left uncovered by desert sands. he discovery of archaeological tion of these two crops and their use material in the form of cloth tapestries r T. remains of the actual tubers and as primary food sources by Peru's early that occasionallybear woven images of roots of potato and sweet potato in Peru coastal inhabitants. Preserved remains potato or sweet potato and of ceramic has contributed greatly to our present- unearthed from the refuse heaps, or vessels representing these two crop day knowledge of the ancient distribu- middens, located in the vicinity of plants as well as others such as achira, ancient ruins (Fig. 1) as well as samples maize, peanut, and squash (Sauer, 1951). recovered from ancient tombs and burial The artistic representation of food plants sites have yielded archaeological records in the woven materials and pottery Qf 1 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline for Homo Sapiens - 3Rd Edition from 2.5M B.C.E
    Timeline for Homo sapiens - 3rd Edition From 2.5M B.C.E. to 300,000 B.C.E. Hominin Species had organized the 1st Industrial Complexes making stone tools in quantities. By 1.8M B.C.E. hand axes and stone points that were flaked on two sides, hominins are demonstrating skill and technique. Undisputed evidence of a footprint that dates to 1.5M B.C.E. of a, "most Many Glacial likely", Homo erectus walking upright in Africa. Homo erectus fossils have been dated and from 1.8M B.C.E. to the 210,000 B.C.E. (12 discoveries are outside of Africa). Bone Interglacial Tools are found at the same epoch. From 1.5M B.C.E. to 790,000 B.C.E. evidence of Epochs occur hearths and cooking. The 1st living species that took control of fire. 500,000 B.C.E. over the 2.5 Hominin Species are hunting large animals with spears. Four wooden spears dated million years circa 400,000 B.C.E. have been found in Germany in 1995. Use of pigments on the body B.C.E. to and painting developed next around 400,000 B.C.E. to 300,000 B.C.E.. Descended from 300,000 B.C.E.. Sea levels rise Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis exists as a distinct species from around and fall 300ft 600,000 B.C.E./500,000 B.C.E. to around 26,000 B.C.E. and no fossils exist that are on average. younger than this time. 570,000/470,000 years tops Homo Sapiens by 370,000/270,000 Average years of existence as a distinct species.
    [Show full text]
  • Rise of Andean Civilization Anthropology G4210 September 22, 1999
    Rise of Andean Civilization Anthropology G4210 September 22, 1999 Paleoindian/Archaic Occupations in the Andes (?-2500 BC) Introduction 1. initial peopling of South America: issue of great controversy a. significant advances in recent years b. dates are getting pushed back at least to 10-12,000 yrs BP (i.e., Before Present) c. but there is considerable disagreement over 1. reliability of radiocarbon assays 2. accuracy of interpretations d. very personalized disputes 2. Archaic is least well understood aspect of the prehistoric occupation of Andes: several reasons a. e.g., time depth: the farther removed human activity is in time, the more difficult it is to ascertain patterns of activity 1. recognizable slices of time and contemporaneity among sites are hard to define b. poor preservation 1. few material remains pertinent to this period have been encountered 2. or recognized as belonging to this time c. identification of remains 1. dispute as to whether some materials were the products of human action or not d. relatively little research: few archaeologists e. inaccessibility of the sites 1. mostly in very high, inhospitable locations f. lack of agreement of the significance of the remains 3. major issues that have been dealt with a. time depth: earliest occupations 1. size of occupation populations b. adaptive strategies c. social organization 1. e.g., group affiliation: Rick 2. agglomeration-dispersion patterns: MacNeish d. reality of occupation: tools or not? e. domestication of animals and perhaps plants [Paleoindian and Archaic] 1 4. together, the authors emphasize a. remarkable variety of localized adaptations in the Andean Archaic b.
    [Show full text]
  • Luminescence Dating in Archaeology: from Origins to Optical
    Radiation Measurements Vol. 27, No. 5/6, pp. 819±892, 1997 # 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved Printed in Great Britain PII: S1350-4487(97)00221-7 1350-4487/98 $19.00 + 0.00 LUMINESCENCE DATING IN ARCHAEOLOGY: FROM ORIGINS TO OPTICAL RICHARD G. ROBERTS School of Earth Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3083, Australia AbstractÐLuminescence dating has a proud history of association with archaeology, beginning almost half a century ago. The subsequent decades of research have seen a range of archaeometric applications of luminescence dating: from ®red pottery and burnt ¯ints to sediments incorporated into occupation deposits and earthen constructions. Important contributions have been made to topics as diverse as modern human origins, continental colonisations and the dating of prehistoric rock art. This paper pro- vides an overview of these applications, with a particular focus on recent ®ndings such as those from Tabun Cave in Israel, Diring Yuriakh in Siberia, and Jinmium in Australia. # 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved 1. INTRODUCTION the key papers published over the past few decades. While some of the more recent and controversial contributions are discussed at length, mention is also made of the less publicised luminescence stu- That they were repositories of the dead, has been obvious to all: but on what particular occasion constructed, was matter dies that have laid many of the technical foun- of doubt. (Thomas Jeerson, 1787, Query XI ``Aborigines'') dations for the dating method. Attention is drawn also to studies that have tackled a long-standing archaeological problem using a novel luminescence More than two centuries have elapsed since technique, or that have reported a technical devel- Thomas Jeerson contemplated the antiquity of opment with implications beyond the speci®c prehistoric burial mounds in North America and archaeological application.
    [Show full text]
  • Level Radioactive Waste Repository Proposed for Yucca Mountain, Nevada
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-Al28-07RW12405 Analogues to Features and Processes of a High- Level Radioactive Waste Repository Proposed for Yucca Mountain, Nevada Professional Paper 1779 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Analogues to Features and Processes of a High-Level Radioactive Waste Repository Proposed for Yucca Mountain, Nevada By Ardyth M. Simmons, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, and John S. Stuckless, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, with a Foreword by Abraham Van Luik, U.S. Department of Energy Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-AI28-07RW12405 Professional Paper 1779 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Index
    SUBJECT INDEX GENERAL hourglass perforation DATING human evolution Aceramic Neolithic hiiyiik AD,ad acculturation industrial archaeology amino-acid racemization amphora industry BC,bc antefix Kerbschnitt bone dating ard kitchen midden BP, bp arrow straightener Leptolithic Bristlecone pine assemblage megalith chronology association menhir collagen astronomy Mesolithic contamination barrow Neolithic cross-dating battle-axe neoteny dating baulk New Archaeology dendrochronology berm Palaeolithic fission track dating Bronze Age palstave fluorine dating calendar, calendrics passage grave half-life capstone pebble tool hard water effect carination pilaster isotoptic fractionation celt pintadera isotopic replacement Chalcolithic place names nitrogen dating chamber tomb portal dolmen obsidan hydration dating chevaux de frise porthole slab palaeomagnetism cist pot boilers potassium-argon dating Copper Age quem radiocarbon dating corbel rampart radiometric dating counterscrap bank rock-cut tomb sequence dating culture sacrifice seriation Cyclopean masonry sati stratigraphy demography segmented cist tephrochronology diffusion, diffusionist septal slab terminus ante-quem, terminus distribution shaft grave post-quem dolmen situla thermoluminescence double axe Stone Age uranium series dating dromos stone circle dyke tell entrance grave tepe ethnoarchaeology Three Age System MATERIALS evolution tore experimental archaeology tradition amber false entrance transepted gallery grave antler fire trepanning arsenic firedog trilithon bone fishing underwater
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology Barbara Ann Kipfer
    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology Barbara Ann Kipfer Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology Second Edition Barbara Ann Kipfer Old Saybrook, CT, USA ISBN 978-3-030-58291-3 ISBN 978-3-030-58292-0 (eBook) ISBN 978-3-030-58293-7 (print and electronic bundle) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58292-0 1st edition: © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000 2nd edition: © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
    [Show full text]