Timeline for Homo Sapiens - 3Rd Edition from 2.5M B.C.E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Timeline for Homo Sapiens - 3Rd Edition from 2.5M B.C.E Timeline for Homo sapiens - 3rd Edition From 2.5M B.C.E. to 300,000 B.C.E. Hominin Species had organized the 1st Industrial Complexes making stone tools in quantities. By 1.8M B.C.E. hand axes and stone points that were flaked on two sides, hominins are demonstrating skill and technique. Undisputed evidence of a footprint that dates to 1.5M B.C.E. of a, "most Many Glacial likely", Homo erectus walking upright in Africa. Homo erectus fossils have been dated and from 1.8M B.C.E. to the 210,000 B.C.E. (12 discoveries are outside of Africa). Bone Interglacial Tools are found at the same epoch. From 1.5M B.C.E. to 790,000 B.C.E. evidence of Epochs occur hearths and cooking. The 1st living species that took control of fire. 500,000 B.C.E. over the 2.5 Hominin Species are hunting large animals with spears. Four wooden spears dated million years circa 400,000 B.C.E. have been found in Germany in 1995. Use of pigments on the body B.C.E. to and painting developed next around 400,000 B.C.E. to 300,000 B.C.E.. Descended from 300,000 B.C.E.. Sea levels rise Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis exists as a distinct species from around and fall 300ft 600,000 B.C.E./500,000 B.C.E. to around 26,000 B.C.E. and no fossils exist that are on average. younger than this time. 570,000/470,000 years tops Homo Sapiens by 370,000/270,000 Average years of existence as a distinct species. The new discovery of Homo Naledi awaits its Global place on the timeline of our origins as well as the Denisovans and another potentially temperatures modern hominin in China (The Red Deer Cave People). Over the rise and fall 8 course of the Pleistocene 2.58M B.C.E. to 9700 B.C.E., to the start of The Holocene to 10 degrees Celsius. The 9700 B.C.E. to the present, there have been 14 glacial periods with the start of the ebb and flow Holocene signifying the end of the Quaternary Pleistocene Epoch. From all the hominin of the glacial species, Homo sapiens is the only homogenous species to survive and thrive to the cycles, seems present. And we are novel on the timeline scale when comparing our time as a distinct to repeat in species versus existence timelines of past hominins. And in that modest amount of 100,000 to time, we have accomplished more in a short time, than any other species that has ever 120,000 year existed. The Human Genome Project evidence says that we are the descendants of a intervals. potential 2000 to 3000 survivors (high thousands maximum) of the last great extinction challenge. As Winston Churchill might have said with knowledge,...."Some Bottle. Some Neck". *B.C.E. - C.E.; are used in this timeline versus: BP – CalBp – Mya or Kya or BC – AD. All “BP” dates are converted to B.C.E. (before common era) for ease of non-academic understanding. 600,000 B.C.E. Mount Carmel Caves (Israel) Human evidence of occupancy to Natufian cultures of 10,000 B.C.E. 500,000 B.C.E. - 250,000 B.C.E. Petralona 1 (Greece) Homo heidelbergensis or archaic Homo sapiens? 400,000 B.C.E. - 200,000 B.C.E. Altamura Cave (Italy) Human skeleton still in situ. Difficult to access and date. *See Font and Cell Colour Code at end of timeline* Glacial 300,000 B.C.E. End of Mindel/Pre-Illinoian/Elsterian/Anglian/Rio Llico - Glacial Period. Glacial 300,000 B.C.E. Neanderthal has had full separation from hominin ancestors for 70,000 to 200,000 years. Glacial 300,000 B.C.E. Qesem Cave (Israel) Hearth with burnt animal bones and flint tools. Homo ???? Glacial 300,000 B.C.E. +/- 20,000 years Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) Jawbone of oldest homo sapien. Glacial 300,000 B.C.E. -125,000 B.C.E. Kabwe Cranium (Zambia) Homo rhodesiensis. 1920 find makes it difficult to date. Glacial 300,000 B.C.E. Y-chromosomal Adam 2013 Y-MRCA (95% confidence of an earlier rare DNA alleles). Glacial 300,000 B.C.E. Geminga Supernova Gama Ray Pulsar Responsible for interstellar medium in our Solar System. 300,000 B.C.E. 300,000 B.C.E. Swanscombe Skull (England) Homo heidelbergensis - or archaic Homo sapien - to 200,000 B.C.E. Glacial to W. & W.290,000 B.C.E. - 100,000 B.C.E. Bhimbetka Petroglyphs (India) oldest known art. Might be older. Creator-Homo? Warm & Wet 290,000 B.C.E. Start of Mindel-Riss/Pre-Illinioan/Holstein/Hoxnian/ S.A. (X) - Interglacial Period Warm & Wet 250,000 B.C.E. Ngandong 7 (Indonesia) Homo erectus with new dating techniques 100,000 B.C.E. - 25,000 B.C.E. Warm & Wet 250,000 B.C.E. - 200,000 B.C.E. Hueyatlaco (Mexico) Human habitation. Multiple stone tools. Multiple occupations. Warm & Wet 230,000 B.C.E. Bontnewydd (Wales) Teeth and part of a jawbone, 11 year old Neanderthal. Warm & Wet 230,000 B.C.E. Neanderthals have spread through Europe. Warm & Wet 230,000 B.C.E. Venus of Berekhat Ram (Israel) Figurine. Confirmed hominid creativity. Oldest Art artifact. Warm & Wet 209,000 B.C.E. Dali Skull (China) Ox teeth found on site date to +/- 23,000 years. Homo erectus or sapien?? W.&W to Glacial208,000 B.C.E. - 200,000 B.C.E. Accelerated glaciation over the next 8000 years. Glacial 200,000 B.C.E. Start of Riss/Illinoian/Saalian/Wolstonian/Santa Maria - Glacial Period. Glacial 200,000 B.C.E. Calico Early Man Site (California U.S.A.) Artifacts or Geofacts? Flakes - stone tools or natural? Glacial 200,000 B.C.E. - 45,000 B.C.E. Tabun Cave (Israel) Predominantly Mousterian artifacts in several stratified layers. Glacial 200,000 B.C.E. Neanderthals & Homo Sapiens co-exist to 30,000 B.C.E. (earliest evidence 190,000 B.C.E. ^^). 200,000 B.C.E. 200,000 B.C.E. Venus of Tan-Tan (Morocco) Figurine. Made by Homo erectus. Glacial 190,000 B.C.E. Omo 1 / Omo 2 ^^ (Ethiopia) Two specimens of early Homo sapiens. Glacial 170,000 B.C.E. - 40,000 B.C.E. Pinnacle Point (South Africa) Marine harvesting evidence exists for over 130,000 years. Glacial 164,000 B.C.E. Heat-Treated Stones for Tools (South Africa) several sites along the coast. Glacial 160,000 B.C.E. Mitochondrial Eve (Africa) The Human Genome Project. Glacial 158,000 B.C.E. Jebel Irhoud 1,2,3,4 (Morocco) Four Homo sapien fossils. Two Adults. Two Children. Glacial 158,000 B.C.E. Homo Sapien Idaltu (Ethiopia) Extinct subspecies of Homo sapiens. Glacial 150,000 B.C.E. Origins of Language (South Africa) "Phonemic Diversity" "Serial Founder Effect" ??? Glacial 140,000 B.C.E.- 138,000 B.C.E. Global Temperature The average temperature is 8/9 degrees colder than today. Glacial 140,000 B.C.E. Sea Level Equal To 18,000 B.C.E. (Shoreline is 300ft lower) Coincides with Last Glacial Maximum. Glacial 132,000 B.C.E. Human Adornment (Israel) (Es Skhul Cave Hafia). Glacial 130,000 B.C.E. Cerruiti Mastdon Bones & Teeth (U.S.A.) Hominin activity – smashed bones and teeth. Glacial 130,000 B.C.E. La Ferrassie Rock Shelter (France) Neanderthal burial site. Two adults & five children. Glacial 130,000 B.C.E. Evidence of Sea Voyages (Crete) 9 sites near Plakais - Tools from Africa ~ Homo Erectus type. Glacial to W. & W.130,000 B.C.E. End of Riss/Illinoian/Saalian/Wolstonian/Santa Maria - Glacial Period. Warm & Wet 129,000 B.C.E. Start of Riss-Wurn/Sangamonian/Eemian/Ipswichian/Valdivia - Interglacial Period Warm & Wet 128,000 B.C.E. -126,000 B.C.E. Global Temperature The average temperature is 2/3 degrees higher than today. Warm & Wet 126,000 B.C.E. +/- 5000 years Late Pleistocene: End of Ionian Stage, beginning of Tarantian Stage Warm & Wet 125,000 B.C.E. Sea Level Equal to Today's Levels To 115,000 B.C.E. Warm & Wet 125,000 B.C.E. - 60,000 B.C.E. Klasies River Mouth (South Africa) Layers show that site was used for 60,000 yrs. Warm & Wet 120,000 B.C.E. - 90,000 B.C.E. Abbassia Pluvial (North Africa) 30,000 year of "Green Sahara". Warm & Wet 118,000 B.C.E. Tabun C1 (Israel) (Mt. Carmel Site) Female Neanderthal skeletal remains. Warm & Wet 113,000 B.C.E. Krapina C (Croatia) Neanderthal skull. 1899 discovery. (+/- 7000 years). Warm & Wet 113,000 B.C.E. Krapina Caves (Croatia) Occupied by Neanderthal (900 fossils of young and old to 30,000 B.C.E.). W. & W. to Glacial110,000 B.C.E. Start of Wurn/Wisconsin/Vistulian/Devensian/Llanquilhue - Glacial Period W. & W. to Glacial110,000 B.C.E. Mandible Klasies River Mouth (South Africa) Cut marks on jawbone suggestive of cannibalism. Glacial 103,000 B.C.E. Scladena (Belgium) Neanderthal jawbone and teeth. DNA…genetically diverse to Homo sapiens. Glacial 100,000 B.C.E. Oldest Intentional Burial (Israel)(Qafzeh) 15 bodies in a cave (71 pieces of ochre & tools). Glacial 100,000 B.C.E. Oldest Paint Factory/Workshop (South Africa)(Blombos Caves) Making Red Paint. 100,000 B.C.E 100,000 B.C.E.
Recommended publications
  • 45.000 Let Stare Fosilne Dlake Jamskega Medveda Iz Najdišča Divje Babe I V Sloveniji
    45.000 let stare fosilne dlake jamskega medveda iz najdišča Divje babe I v Sloveniji Ivan TURK, Franc CIMERMAN, Janez DIRJEC, Slavko POLAK in Jurij MAJDIČ Izvleček Abstract V paleolitskem najdišču in fosilnem brlogu jamskega medveda Imprints and fossilised remains of cave bear hair were found Divje babe I so bili najdeni poleg številnih kosti in zob tudi in a fossil den at the Palaeolithic site of Divje babe-I, in ad- odtisi dlak in njihovi fosilni ostanki, stari 45.000 let. Fosilizirane dition to a plethora of bones and teeth. The hairs from Divje dlake iz Divjih bab I so zaenkrat edinstven primer v jamskem babe-I are currently the only example of their kind found in sedimentacijskem okolju. cave deposits. UVOD let (RIDDL 734,746, 759; Turke/al. 1989). Najbolj zanesljive datacije plasti z mousterienskimi najd- Dolgoletne raziskave v novejšem večplastnem bami so bile pridobljene na podlagi vzajemnih paleolitskem najdišču Divje babe I v dolini Idrijce vzorcev lesnega oglja in kostnega kolagena (RIDDL v severozahodni Sloveniji so pripeljale tudi do 739 + 745 in 746 + 759) iz zaključenih celot (kvadrat zanimivega in po svoje pomembnega odkritja fo- 1 x lm in reženj debeline 0,25 oz. 0,30 m), tako siliziranih ostankov dlak in njihovih odtisov. da različni materiali vzorcev niso dali statistično Najdišče Divje babe I je v slovenskem prostoru različne radiokarbonske starosti (P > 0,80) (cfr. pomembno predvsem zaradi nove skupine paleo- Taylor 1987, 125). litskih najdb in trenutno najbolj bogatih paleon- Sistematska izkopavanja v Divjih babah I so toloških in paleobotaničnih ostankov v arheolo- se začela leta 1980 in še trajajo.
    [Show full text]
  • Panthera Pardus ., 2003).Ouraim,However, Is Var
    THE LEOPARD (PANTHERA PARDUS), THE RARE HUNTER OF THE ALPINE AREA DURING THE UPPER PLEISTOCENE MARTINA PACHER UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA, INSTITUTE OF PALAEONTOLOGY, PALAEOBIOLOGY-VERTEBRATEPALAEONTOL- OGY, GEOZENTRUM UZA II, ALTHANSTRASSE 14, A-1090 VIENNA, AUSTRIA, [email protected] GERNOT RABEDER UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA, INSTITUTE OF PALAEONTOLOGY, PALAEOBIOLOGY-VERTEBRATEPALAEONTOL- OGY, GEOZENTRUM UZA II, ALTHANSTRASSE 14, A-1090 VIENNA, AUSTRIA, [email protected] Abstract The paper presents a revision of leopard remains in the Alps with special focus on the Eastern Alpine area and Switzerland. The oldest evidence comes from the Middle Pleistocene of Hundsheim, Austria, followed by remains from Repolust-cave, Styria, Austria. During the Upper Pleistocene the leopard also reached the high Alps. The highest elevated finds come from the Drachenloch, Switzerland. Nonetheless, its distribution into the Eastern Alpine area is limited, especially at higher elevations. The leopard reached the Alpine area only occasionally with exception of the southern French Alps and Liguria, Italy. Samenvatting Dit artikel presenteert een herziening van de gevonden luipaardresten in de Alpen met een speciale focus op het Oostelijk Alpengebied en Zwitserland. Het oudste bewijsmateriaal komt uit het Midden-Pleistoceen van Hundsheim (Oostenrijk), gevolgd door resten uit de Repolustgrot in Styria (Oostenrijk). Gedurende het Laat- Pleistoceen bereikte het luipaard ook het Alpengebied. De hoogst gelegen vondsten komen van de Drachen- lochgrot in Zwitserland. Toch is de distributie in het Oostelijk Alpengebied beperkt, vooral bij grotere hoogtes. Het luipaard bereikte slechts incidenteel het Alpengebied met uitzondering van de zuidelijke Franse Alpen en ICBS PROCEEDINGS Liguirië (Italië). at the collection Weinfurter at the Institute of Palaeontology INTRODUCTION Vienna (table 2, table 4-8, plate 1).
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Years on Ice Age Europe Network Celebrates – Page 5
    network of heritage sites Magazine Issue 2 aPriL 2018 neanderthal rock art Latest research from spanish caves – page 6 Underground theatre British cave balances performances with conservation – page 16 Caves with ice age art get UnesCo Label germany’s swabian Jura awarded world heritage status – page 40 5 Years On ice age europe network celebrates – page 5 tewww.ice-age-europe.euLLING the STORY of iCe AGE PeoPLe in eUROPe anD eXPL ORING PLEISTOCene CULtURAL HERITAGE IntrOductIOn network of heritage sites welcome to the second edition of the ice age europe magazine! Ice Age europe Magazine – issue 2/2018 issn 2568­4353 after the successful launch last year we are happy to present editorial board the new issue, which is again brimming with exciting contri­ katrin hieke, gerd­Christian weniger, nick Powe butions. the magazine showcases the many activities taking Publication editing place in research and conservation, exhibition, education and katrin hieke communication at each of the ice age europe member sites. Layout and design Brightsea Creative, exeter, Uk; in addition, we are pleased to present two special guest Beate tebartz grafik Design, Düsseldorf, germany contributions: the first by Paul Pettitt, University of Durham, cover photo gives a brief overview of a groundbreaking discovery, which fashionable little sapiens © fumane Cave proved in february 2018 that the neanderthals were the first Inside front cover photo cave artists before modern humans. the second by nuria sanz, water bird – hohle fels © urmu, director of UnesCo in Mexico and general coor­­­di nator of the Photo: burkert ideenreich heaDs programme, reports on the new initiative for a serial transnational nomination of neanderthal sites as world heritage, for which this network laid the foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genetic Analysis of the Gibraltar Neanderthals
    A genetic analysis of the Gibraltar Neanderthals Lukas Bokelmanna,1, Mateja Hajdinjaka, Stéphane Peyrégnea, Selina Braceb, Elena Essela, Cesare de Filippoa, Isabelle Glockea, Steffi Grotea, Fabrizio Mafessonia, Sarah Nagela, Janet Kelsoa, Kay Prüfera, Benjamin Vernota, Ian Barnesb, Svante Pääboa,1,2, Matthias Meyera,2, and Chris Stringerb,1,2 aDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; and bCentre for Human Evolution Research, Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom Contributed by Svante Pääbo, June 14, 2019 (sent for review March 22, 2019; reviewed by Roberto Macchiarelli and Eva-Maria Geigl) The Forbes’ Quarry and Devil’s Tower partial crania from Gibraltar geographic range from western Europe to western Asia (for an are among the first Neanderthal remains ever found. Here, we overview of all specimens, see SI Appendix, Table S1). Thus, show that small amounts of ancient DNA are preserved in the there is currently no evidence for the existence of substantial petrous bones of the 2 individuals despite unfavorable climatic genetic substructure in the Neanderthal population after ∼90 ka conditions. However, the endogenous Neanderthal DNA is present ago (4), the time at which the “Altai-like” Neanderthals in the among an overwhelming excess of recent human DNA. Using im- Altai had presumably been replaced by more “Vindija 33.19- proved DNA library construction methods that enrich for DNA like” Neanderthals (17). fragments carrying deaminated cytosine residues, we were able The Neanderthal fossils of Gibraltar are among the most to sequence 70 and 0.4 megabase pairs (Mbp) nuclear DNA of the prominent finds in the history of paleoanthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth, Learning, Play and Attachment in Neanderthal Children
    This is a repository copy of The Cradle of Thought : Growth, Learning, Play and Attachment in Neanderthal children. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/83027/ Version: Submitted Version Article: Spikins, Penny orcid.org/0000-0002-9174-5168, Hitchens, Gail, Rutherford, Holly et al. (1 more author) (2014) The Cradle of Thought : Growth, Learning, Play and Attachment in Neanderthal children. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. pp. 111-134. ISSN 0262-5253 https://doi.org/10.1111/ojoa.12030 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ THE CRADLE OF THOUGHT: GROWTH, LEARNING, PLAY AND ATTACHMENT IN NEANDERTHAL CHILDREN Penny Spikins, Gail Hitchens, Andy Needham and Holly Rutherford Department of Archaeology University of York King’s Manor York YO1 7EP SUMMARY Childhood is a core stage in development, essential in the acquisition of social, practical and cultural skills. However, this area receives limited attention in archaeological debate, especially in early prehistory.
    [Show full text]
  • Tese1997vol1.Pdf
    Dedicado à Cristina e ao João David Advertência prévia Este trabalho corresponde à dissertação escrita pelo autor para obtenção do grau de doutoramento em Pré-História pela Universidade de Lisboa. A sua redacção ficou concluída em Abril de 1995, e a respectiva arguição teve lugar em Novembro do mesmo ano. A versão agora publicada beneficiou de pequenos ajustamentos do texto, de uma actualização da biliografia e do acrescento de alguns elementos de informação novos, nomeadamente no que diz respeito a datações radiométricas. A obra compreende dois volumes. No volume II agruparam-se os capítulos sobre a história da investigação e a metodologia utilizada na análise dos materiais líticos, bem como os estudos monográficos das diferentes colecções. No volume I, sintetizaram-se as conclusões derivadas desses estudos, e procurou-se integrá-las num quadro histórico e geográfico mais lato, o das sociedades de caçadores do Paleolítico Superior do Sudoeste da Europa. A leitura do volume I é suficiente para a aquisição de uma visão de conjunto dos conhecimentos actuais respeitantes a este período em Portugal. Uma tal leitura deve ter em conta, porém, que essa síntese pressupõe uma crítica das fontes utilizadas. Em Arqueologia, o instrumento dessa crítica é a análise tafonómica dos sítios e espólios. A argumentação sobre as respectivas condições de jazida é desenvolvida no quadro dos estudos apresentados no volume II. É neles que deve ser buscada a razão de ser das opções tomadas quanto à caracterização dos contextos (ocupações singulares, palimpsestos de ocupações múltiplas), à sua homogeneidade (uma só época ou várias épocas), à sua integridade (em posição primária ou secundária), à sua representatividade (universo ou amostra, recuperação integral ou parcial) e à sua cronologia (ou cronologias).
    [Show full text]
  • UNE NOUVELLE REPRÉSENTATION FÉMININE À La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne)
    PALEO – N° 21 – 2009-2010 – Pages 127 à 134 UNE NOUVELLE REPRÉSENTATION FÉMININE à La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne) Jean-Pierre DUHARD (1) Résumé : L’auteur présente une figure féminine sculptée sur bois de renne, provenant du Magdalénien IV du grand abri de La Madeleine en Dordogne. Elle vient compléter le petit corpus de figurations humaines de ce site, par ailleurs riche en œuvres d’art. Le corps est représenté en vue frontale et se résume à un tronc et à un pelvis, avec indication des racines crurales et du triangle pubo-génital. Dans sa morphologie, il n’est pas sans rappeler la figure gravée de Lespugue et la figure en ronde bosse de Laugerie-Basse et il illustre la tendance au schématisme de ces figures féminines mobilières magdaléniennes. Mots-clés : Paléolithique, Magdalénien, art mobilier, sculpture, figure féminine, La Madeleine. Key-words: Palaeolithic, Magdalenian, mobiliar art, sculpture, female figure, Madeleine. Abridged english version New female representation in La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne). The author presents a segment of cortical reindeer antler, elongated and of semi-circular section, carrying a female carved figure from the Magdalenian IV of the large shelter of Madeleine in Dordogne (France) and stored in the Musée national de préhistoire. Discovered by D. Peyrony during his excavations between 1910 and 1913, it had been described in the monography of E. Capitan and D. Peyrony (1928) as a blade dagger (fig. 1). Without prejudice to the use of this object, it provides an unambiguous but schematic representation of a woman (fig. 2, 3, 4, 5), Her body is represented in frontal view, and comes down to the trunk and pelvis, with indication of the starting point of the thighs and the pubogenital triangle.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology
    CALIFOR!:HA STATE UNIVERSI'fY, NO:R'l'HRIDGE 'l'HE EVOLUTIONARY SCHENES 0!.'' NEANDER.THAL A thesis su~nitted in partial satisfaction of tl:e requirements for the degree of Naste.r of A.rts Anthropology by Sharon Stacey Klein The Thesis of Sharon Stacey Klein is approved: Dr·,~ Nike West. - Dr. Bruce Gelvin, Chair California s·tate University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ·There are many people I would like to thank. Firs·t, the members of my corr.mi ttee who gave me their guidance and suggestions. Second, rny family and friends who supported me through this endea7cr and listened to my constant complaining. Third, the people in my office who allowed me to use my time to complete ·this project. Specifically, I appreciate the proof-reading done by my mother and the French translations done by Mary Riedel. ii.i TABLE OF' CONTENTS PAGE PRELIMINA:H.Y MATEIUALS : Al")stra-:-:t vi CHAP'I'ERS: I. Introduction 1 II. Methodology and Materials 4 III. Classification of Neanderthals 11 Species versus Subspecies Definitions of Neanderthals 16 V. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis .i9 VI. The Unilinear Hypothesis 26 Horphological Evidence Transi tiona.l Sp.. ::;:cimens T'ool Complexes VII. The Pre-Neanderthal Hypothesis 58 Morphological Evidence Spectrum Hypothesis "Classic'1 Neanderthal's Adaptations Transitional Evidence Tool Complexes VIII. Sumnary and Conclusion 90 Heferences Cited 100 1. G~<ological and A.rchaeoloqical 5 Subdivisions of the P1eistoce!1e 2. The Polyphyletic Hypothesis 17 3. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis 20 4. The UnilinPar Hypothesis 27 iv FIGUHES: P.Z\GE 5. Size Comparisons of Neanderthal 34 and Australian Aborigine Teeth 6.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2017 N°17
    ISSN 2499-1341 EXPRESSION quarterly e-journal of atelier in cooperation with uispp-cisenp. international scientific commission on the intellectual and spiritual expressions of non-literate peoples N°17 September 2017 CULT SITES AND ART Anthropomorphic face on the entrance slab of a circular ceremonial structure from Har Karkom, Negev desert, Israel (Pre-pottery Neolithic site BK 608). EDITORIAL NOTES accompany them. What echoes accompanied CULT SITES the paintings in the prehistoric caves? What performances, if any, were taking place in front AND ART of the decorated rock surfaces? The visual art stresses myths, mythical beings Walking along a narrow trail, on the edge of and/or historical facts, which are related to the a steep valley in the middle of a deep forest, cult and to the sanctity of the site. It is the visual we suddenly heard noises of human presen- memory that justifes the function of the site. ce, voices that were neither speeches nor son- Was it the same in prehistoric times? In front of gs, something in between. We reached a cave where a number of people were assembled in rock art sites, in the Camonica Valley, Italy, or a corner and an old bearded man was standing in Kakadu in Arnhem Land, Australia, or in the on an upper step of the rock talking ... perhaps Drakensberg caves, South Africa, or in the Al- talking, perhaps declaiming, perhaps singing, tamira cave, Spain, the presence of prehistoric but not to the people below. He was talking or art awakens a sense of sacredness, we feel that performing or praying in front of a white rock these were and are special places but ..
    [Show full text]
  • SCIRES-IT, 9(2), Paper3 Valzano, Negro & Lucarella Otranto
    SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologie dell'Informazione Vol 9, Issue 2 (2019), 17-28 e-ISSN 2239-4303, DOI 10.2423/i22394303v9n2p17 Open access article licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND CASPUR-CIBER Publishing, http://www.sciresit.it OTRANTO TREASURES IN 3D Virginia Valzano*, Fabio Negro**, Domenico Lucarella*** **University of Salento – CEIT, Italy **Leaf Software s.n.c. - Maglie (LE), Italy ***University of Salento, Italy Abstract Otranto is an Italian city located on the Adriatic coast of the Salento peninsula, on the easternmost stretch of Italy. Always considered one of the pearls of the Mediterranean, Otranto exudes a timeless charm, with its countless historical, artistic and naturalistic beauties. "Otranto Treasures in 3D" is a video-documentary that tells the millennial charm of Otranto’s, landscape, culture and nature through video footage and 3D reconstructions. The video allows a guided virtual tour of the wonders of Otranto, to discover this ancient town, to know and admire its churches and its splendid monuments and some ancient settlements and archaeological sites of remarkable relevance, such as the Grotta dei Cervi in Porto Badisco, and to dive into a crystal blue sea, a realm of enchanting habitats rich in biodiversity and spectacular backdrops. Keywords Otranto, Porto Badisco, 3D movie, CoCoNet, Mediterranean in 3D, Underwater 3D filming, Grotta dei Cervi, Deer Cave, Aragonese Castle, Castel's Chapel, Donna Teresa de Azevedo, Three-dimensional reconstruction, Virtual representation, 3D models, 3D imaging, 3D animation, Texture mapping, Cultural Heritage 1. Introduction Albania, and the Terra d'Otranto, an ancient district of the Kingdom of Naples.
    [Show full text]
  • Microblade Complexes and Traditions in the Interior Northwest, As Seen from Kelly Creek, West-Central Yukon
    Heri tage Branch Government of the Yukon Hud~ Hudlln Series Occasional Papers in Archaeology No.6 MLCROBLADE COMPLEXES AND TRADITIONS IN THE INTERIOR NORTHWEST. AS SEEN FROM THE KELLY CREEK SITE, WEST-CENTRAL YUKON Donald W. Clark and Ruth M. Gotthardt With contributions from Paul Gregory Hare YUKON Tourism Heritage Branch Dave Keenan, Minister 1999 MICROBLADE COMPLEXES AND TRADITIONS IN THE INTERIOR NORTHWEST, AS SEEN FROM KELLY CREEK, WEST-CENTRAL YUKON DONALD W. CLARK Emeritus, Canadian Museum of Civilization RUTH M. GOTTHARDT Yukon Heritage Branch With contributions from PAUL GREGORY HARE Yukon Heritage Branch 1999 AllSTRACT This report describes the microblade industry from the Kelly Creek site, KbTx-2, which is located in the Frenchman La.kes area near Carmacks, Yukon. Testing and excavation was done at KbTx-2 during several seasons from 1981 to 1994. The si te produced one of the larger samples of a microblade industry to come from the Yukon, with more than 20 cores. The microblade cores are mainly classic examples of the Campus type, also referred to as Denali type. Abundant evidence was recovered of the Campus mode of platform rejuvenation through longitudinal detachment of platform tablets. In the broad context of northwestern North American prehistory, Kelly Creek is an American Palaeo-Arctic Or Denali complex, or Late Denali or Northwest Mioroblade tradition assemblage, or possibly even Northern Archaic tradition site. These tradition constructs only partially overlap or duplicate one another. [n an attempt to deal with and resolve what is plainly a systematics problem, we review and discuss these organizational constructs as they are used in the greater region.
    [Show full text]
  • Communiqué De Presse Juin 2018
    Communiqué de presse Juin 2018 Mémoire de Mammouth 30 Juin – 12 novembre 2018 Musée national de Préhistoire Les Eyzies-de-Tayac (Dordogne) Le mammouth est incontestablement l’animal le plus emblématique des temps préhistoriques, du moins si l’on entend par préhistoire la période couvrant les origines et l’évolution de l’Homme jusqu’à l’avènement de l’écriture. Les quelques millions d’années concernées connaissent une série d’oscillations climatiques auxquelles correspondent plusieurs espèces d’éléphantidés, mammouths et éléphants. Durant le Quaternaire en France, on dénombre au moins quatre espèces : le mammouth méridional (Mammuthus meridionalis), le mammouth des steppes (Mammuthus trogontherii), l’éléphant antique, à défenses droites (Palaeoloxodon antiquus) et le mammouth laineux (Mammuthus primigenius), auquel il faut ajouter un Mammuthus intermedius dont le statut d’espèce à part fait encore débat. Tous ces animaux présentent des caractéristiques physiques similaires, une trompe (probocis en grec), une taille importante, culminant à plus de 4,5 m pour le mammouth des steppes, des membres en pilier qui se terminent sur cinq doigts. Mais c’est leur dentition qui les distingue : outre les défenses (incisives supérieures à croissance continue), il n’y a que des molaires et chaque nouvelle dent provoque l’expulsion de la précédente. Enfin, la morphologie des molaires caractérise les éléphantidés car elles sont constituées de nombreux reliefs transversaux, les lamelles. Durant la deuxième moitié du Quaternaire, à partir de 1 million d’années à peu près, la présence de l’Homme est bien attestée en France et plusieurs questions se posent désormais sur les relations entretenues entre le plus gros mammifère terrestre et nos ancêtres.
    [Show full text]