Russian/Soviet 'Iranology' and Russo-Iranian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Russian/Soviet 'Iranology' and Russo-Iranian Oriental Studies and Foreign Policy: Russian/Soviet ‘Iranology’ and Russo-Iranian relations in late Imperial Russia and the early USSR A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2014 Denis V. Volkov School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of Contents List of Contents.....................................................................................................................2 Alphabetical List of Abbreviations and Acronyms...........................................................5 List of Archives used for research (Russia and Georgia).................................................9 Abstract...............................................................................................................................10 Declaration……………………………………………….……………………………….11 Copyright Statement…………………………………………………………………….11 A Note on Transliteration……………………………………………………………….12 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………..13 About the Author………………………………………………………………………14 Introduction........................................................................................................................15 Research context and rationale...................................................................................15 Statement of method...................................................................................................20 Chapter One Theoretical framework: Foucauldian notions and their applicability to the Russian Case………………..……………………………… 26 Introduction………………………..…………….……….………………..………26 Foucauldian concepts and Russia........................................................................26 Imperial Russia...........................................................................................................29 Soviet Russia...............................................................................................................31 The Foucauldian power/knowledge............................................................................33 Organisational arrangement of science and scholarly knowledge in late Imperial Russia................................................................................................36 Organisational arrangement of science and scholarly knowledge in early Soviet Russia........................................................40 The Foucauldian épistème………………………………………………….……...45 Epistème in Russia.....................................................................................................46 The Foucauldian discourse.........................................................................................47 Discourse in Imperial Russia......................................................................................50 Discourse in Soviet Russia.........................................................................................52 The Foucauldian Intellectual......................................................................................55 The Intellectual and Resistance in Imperial Russia...................................................58 The Intellectual and Resistance in Soviet Russia.................................................60 Conclusion..................................................................................................................61 2 Chapter Two Organisational set-up of late Imperial Russian Oriental studies...........................63 Introduction................................................................................................................63 Political context of the Russian-Persian relationship at the turn of the century............................................................................................64 Russian Oriental studies academic scholarship in the late nineteenth and the early twentieth century...............................................73 Russian military Oriental studies before 1917...........................................................84 Russian diplomatic service and Oriental studies before 1917..................................93 Missionary activities in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.................97 Conclusion................................................................................................................100 Chapter Three Organisational set-up of early Soviet Oriental studies (1917-1941)....................106 Introduction...............................................................................................................106 Political context of Russian-Persian relationships in 1917-1921.............................107 Soviet military Oriental studies, 1917-1921............................................................112 Soviet diplomatic service and Oriental studies, 1917-1921....................................116 Soviet Oriental studies scholarship set-up in 1917-1921...............................119 Political context of the Russian-Iranian relationships in 1921-1941………………122 Soviet diplomatic and military Oriental studies, 1921-1941……………………..126 The organisational set-up of academic Oriental studies, 1921-1941…………132 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………139 Chapter Four Between Cultures and States: Russian Orientologists and Russia’s Eastern policy..141 Introduction...............................................................................................................141 “Civilian” academic scholars..................................................................................142 Officers-vostochniki.................................................................................................155 Diplomats-vostochniki..............................................................................................167 Conclusion................................................................................................................172 Chapter Five The Birth and Death of Red Orientalism (1917-1941)………………………….........174 Introduction…………………………………………………………………...........174 Academic Iranology: New vs. Old……………………………………………….178 Red Orientalism: NKID as a mill of scholarly knowledge.....................................187 3 Discontinuities and the inception of institutional practices....................................191 ‘A nation does not make mistakes, does she?’.......................................................198 Conclusion................................................................................................................200 General Conclusion........................................................................................202 Appendix One...................................................................................................................209 Bibliography.....................................................................................................................223 Published primary sources........................................................................................223 Secondary sources.....................................................................................................227 Word count: 79,981. 4 Alphabetical List of Abbreviations and Acronyms AVPRF (Arkhiv Vneshnei Politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii) – The Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation; ARAN (Arkhiv Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk) – The Archive of Russia’s Academy of Sciences; AV (Arkhiv Vostokovedov) – The Archive of Orientologists (St.Petersburg); AVPRI (Arkhiv Vneshnei Politiki Rossiiskoi Imperii) – The Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire; Cheka (Chrezvychainaia Kommissiia po Bor’be s Kontrrevoliutsiei i Sabotazhem) – The Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage; DST (La Direction de la Surveillance du Territoire) – The French Counterespionage Service; FSB (Federal’naia Sluzhba Bezopasnosti) – The Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation; GARF (Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii) – The State Archive of the Russian Federation; GNCM – The Georgian National Centre of Manuscripts; GPU (Gosudarstvennoe Politicheskoe Upravlenie) – The State Political Directorate; GRU (Glavnoe Razvedovatel’noe Upravlenie) – The Chief Intelligence Directorate of the Army; 5 GULAG (Glavnoe Upravlenie Ispravitel’no-Trudovykh Lagerei) – The Chief-Directorate of Corrective Labour Camps and Labour Settlements of the OGPU/NKVD; INO OGPU (Inostrannyi Otdel Gosudarstvennogo Politicheskogo Upravleniia) – The Foreign Department of the United State Political Directorate; IRGO (Imperatorskoe Russkoe Geograficheskoe Obshestvo) – The Imperial Russian Geographical Society; IVRAN (Institut Vostokovedeniia Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk) – The Institute of Oriental Studies of Russia’s Academy of Sciences; KGB (Kommitet Gosudarstvennoi Bezopasnosti) – The State Security Commitee; KUTV (Kommunisticheskii Universitet Trudiashikhsia Vostoka) – The Communist University of the Toilers of the Orient; MID (Ministerstvo Inostrannykh Del) – The Ministry of Foreign Affairs; MIV (Moskovskii Institut Vostokovedeniia) – The Moscow Institute of Oriental Studies; Narkomnats (Narodnyi Kommissariat Natsional’nostei) – The People’s Commissatiat of Nationalities; Narkomvneshtorg (Narodnyi Kommissariat Vneshei Torgovli) – The People’s Commissariat of Foreign Trade; Narkomvoendel (Narodnyi Commissariat Voennykh Del) – The People’s Commissariat of Military Affairs; 6 NEP (Novaia Ekonomicheskaia Politika) – The New Economic Policy; NKID (Narodnyi Kommissariat Inostrannykh Del) – The People’s Commissariat
Recommended publications
  • On Russian Music Might Win It
    37509_u01.qxd 5/19/08 4:04 PM Page 27 1 Some Thoughts on the History and Historiography of Russian Music A preliminary version of this chapter was read as a paper in a symposium or- ganized by Malcolm H. Brown on “Fifty Years of American Research in Slavic Music,” given at the fiftieth national meeting of the American Musicological Society, on 27 October 1984. The other participants in the symposium and their topics were Barbara Krader (Slavic Ethnic Musics), Milos Velimirovic (Slavic Church Music), Malcolm H. Brown (Russian Music—What Has Been Done), Laurel Fay (The Special Case of Soviet Music—Problems of Method- ology), and Michael Beckerman (Czech Music Research). Margarita Mazo served as respondent. My assigned topic for this symposium was “What Is to Be Done,” but being no Chernïshevsky, still less a Lenin, I took it on with reluctance. I know only too well the fate of research prospectuses. All the ones I’ve seen, whatever the field, have within only a few years taken on an aspect that can be most charitably described as quaint, and the ones that have attempted to dictate or legislate the activity of future generations of scholars cannot be so charitably described. It is not as though we were trying to find a long- sought medical cure or a solution to the arms race. We are not crusaders, nor have we an overriding common goal that demands the subordina- tion of our individual predilections to a team effort. We are simply curious to know and understand the music that interests us as well as we possibly can, and eager to stimulate the same interest in others.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union’s East Border Brie, Mircea and Horga, Ioan and Şipoş, Sorin University of Oradea, Romania 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44082/ MPRA Paper No. 44082, posted 31 Jan 2013 05:28 UTC ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER Mircea BRIE Ioan HORGA Sorin ŞIPOŞ (Coordinators) Debrecen/Oradea 2011 This present volume contains the papers of the international conference Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union‟s East Border, held in Oradea between 2nd-5th of June 2011, organized by Institute for Euroregional Studies Oradea-Debrecen, University of Oradea and Department of International Relations and European Studies, with the support of the European Commission and Bihor County Council. CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY STUDIES Mircea BRIE Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Dialogue in the European Border Space.......11 Ioan HORGA Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Education in the Curricula of European Studies .......19 MINORITY AND MAJORITY IN THE EASTERN EUROPEAN AREA Victoria BEVZIUC Electoral Systems and Minorities Representations in the Eastern European Area........31 Sergiu CORNEA, Valentina CORNEA Administrative Tools in the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Ethnic Minorities .............................................................................................................47
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Soviet Investigation of the 1991 Coup the Suppressed Transcripts
    Supreme Soviet Investigation of the 1991 Coup The Suppressed Transcripts: Part 3 Hearings "About the Illegal Financia) Activity of the CPSU" Editor 's Introduction At the birth of the independent Russian Federation, the country's most pro-Western reformers looked to the West to help fund economic reforms and social safety nets for those most vulnerable to the change. However, unlike the nomenklatura and party bureaucrats who remained positioned to administer huge aid infusions, these reformers were skeptical about multibillion-dollar Western loans and credits. Instead, they wanted the West to help them with a different source of money: the gold, platinum, diamonds, and billions of dollars in hard currency the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) and KGB intelligence service laundered abroad in the last years of perestroika. Paradoxically, Western governments generously supplied the loans and credits, but did next to nothing to support the small band of reformers who sought the return of fortunes-estimated in the tens of billions of dollars- stolen by the Soviet leadership. Meanwhile, as some in the West have chronicled, the nomenklatura and other functionaries who remained in positions of power used the massive infusion of Western aid to enrich themselves-and impoverish the nation-further. In late 1995, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development concluded that Russian officials had stolen $45 billion in Western aid and deposited the money abroad. Radical reformers in the Russian Federation Supreme Soviet, the parliament that served until its building was destroyed on President Boris Yeltsin's orders in October 1993, were aware of this mass theft from the beginning and conducted their own investigation as part of the only public probe into the causes and circumstances of the 1991 coup attempt against Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blind Leading the Blind
    WORKING PAPER #60 The Blind Leading the Blind: Soviet Advisors, Counter-Insurgency and Nation-Building in Afghanistan By Artemy Kalinovsky, January 2010 COLD War INTernaTionaL HISTorY ProjecT Working Paper No. 60 The Blind Leading the Blind: Soviet Advisors, Counter-Insurgency and Nation-Building in Afghanistan By Artemy Kalinovsky THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES Christian F. Ostermann and Mircea Munteanu Series Editors This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry. The project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeks to accelerate the process of integrating new sources, materials and perspectives from the former “Communist bloc” with the historiography of the Cold War which has been written over the past few decades largely by Western scholars reliant on Western archival sources. It also seeks to transcend barriers of language, geography, and regional specialization to create new links among scholars interested in Cold War history. Among the activities undertaken by the project to promote this aim are a periodic BULLETIN to disseminate new findings, views, and activities pertaining to Cold War history; a fellowship program for young historians from the former Communist bloc to conduct archival research and study Cold War history in the United States; international scholarly meetings, conferences, and seminars; and publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Birthright Democracy: Nationhood and Constitutional Self-Government in History
    BIRTHRIGHT DEMOCRACY: NATIONHOOD AND CONSTITUTIONAL SELF-GOVERNMENT IN HISTORY By Ethan Alexander-Davey A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2013 Date of final oral examination: 8/16/13 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Richard Avramenko, Political Science Daniel Kapust, Political Science James Klausen, Political Science Howard Schweber, Political Science Johann Sommerville, History i Abstract How did constitutionally limited government and democracy emerge in the West? Many scholars from many different perspectives have attempted to answer this question. I identify the emergence of these forms of self-government with early modern nationalism. Broadly speaking, nationalism of the right sort provides indispensable resources both for united popular resistance against autocratic rule, and for the formation and legitimation of national systems self- governance. Resistance and self-government both require a national consciousness that includes a myth of national origin, a national language, a common faith, and, crucially, native traditions of self-government, and stories of heroic ancestors who successfully defended those traditions against usurpers and tyrants. It is through national consciousness that abstract theories of resistance and self-government become concrete and tenable. It is though national fellowship that the idea of a political nation, possessing the right to make rulers accountable to its will, comes into existence and is sustained over time. My arguments basically fall under two headings, historical and theoretical. By an examination of the nationalist political thought of early modern European countries, I intend to establish important historical connections between the rise of nationalism and the emergence of self-government.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence
    Russia • Military / Security Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, No. 5 PRINGLE At its peak, the KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti) was the largest HISTORICAL secret police and espionage organization in the world. It became so influential DICTIONARY OF in Soviet politics that several of its directors moved on to become premiers of the Soviet Union. In fact, Russian president Vladimir V. Putin is a former head of the KGB. The GRU (Glavnoe Razvedvitelnoe Upravleniye) is the principal intelligence unit of the Russian armed forces, having been established in 1920 by Leon Trotsky during the Russian civil war. It was the first subordinate to the KGB, and although the KGB broke up with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the GRU remains intact, cohesive, highly efficient, and with far greater resources than its civilian counterparts. & The KGB and GRU are just two of the many Russian and Soviet intelli- gence agencies covered in Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence. Through a list of acronyms and abbreviations, a chronology, an introductory HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF essay, a bibliography, and hundreds of cross-referenced dictionary entries, a clear picture of this subject is presented. Entries also cover Russian and Soviet leaders, leading intelligence and security officers, the Lenin and Stalin purges, the gulag, and noted espionage cases. INTELLIGENCE Robert W. Pringle is a former foreign service officer and intelligence analyst RUSSIAN with a lifelong interest in Russian security. He has served as a diplomat and intelligence professional in Africa, the former Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe. For orders and information please contact the publisher && SOVIET Scarecrow Press, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Strategy Selection of Religious Minorities in Modern Iran: the Case of the Jewish, Christian, and Baha’I Communities
    Educational Strategy Selection of Religious Minorities in Modern Iran: The Case of the Jewish, Christian, and Baha’i Communities Sina Mossayeb Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2010 © 2010 Sina Mossayeb All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Educational Strategy Selection of Religious Minorities in Modern Iran Sina Mossayeb Based on the concept of education as a universal right, this dissertation analyzes the impact of government repression on the access to and quality of educational opportunities of minority groups, and the strategies used by marginalized and discriminated groups in response to educational inequity under authoritarian regimes. Do minority groups accept, tolerate, resist, or reject the limitations imposed on them? Do they establish their own institutions and services, or leave the country in pursuit of educational opportunity? This dissertation describes and illustrates the situation of three groups: Jews, Christians, and Baha’is, living in modern Iran. I argue that group composition and characteristics, networks, and regime-group relations significantly shape the strategies developed, selected, and deployed by minority groups in meeting educational needs. Relational dynamics between the groups (and their internal communities) and the regime, and other transnational actors are critical motivating factors in the pursuit of educational opportunities. I draw on historical analysis and the mechanism-process approach to identify educational strategies and explain how they are selected, and argue that group features both affect educational strategy selection, and are affected by previous strategies. The relational dynamics of interactions, conditions, processes, and outcomes are considered as causal factors in educational strategy selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthony Sherley's Relation of His Trauels
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications -- Department of English English, Department of 2016 Courtly Connections: Anthony Sherley’s Relation of his trauels (1613) in a Global Context Julia Schleck Kaya Sahin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishfacpubs Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, Modern Literature Commons, and the Reading and Language Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications -- Department of English by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Courtly Connections: Anthony Sherley’s Relation of his trauels (1613) in a Global Context KAYA S¸AHIN, Indiana University JULIA SCHLECK, University of Nebraska –Lincoln This article revisits Anthony Sherley’s Relation of his trauels into Persia (1613), reading the text within the larger context of early modern Eurasia. It highlights the ways in which at least one European traveler sought and found not alterity, but commensurable structures, social roles, political ideologies, and personal motivations in the Islamic polities to the east and emphasized these connections to his European readers. Furthermore, in making the case that Sherley’s narrative is informed by local actors in Safavid Persia, it maintains that a certain level of Eastern knowledge is present within Western texts from this period and awaits scholarly excavation. INTRODUCTION DESPITE VARIOUS ATTEMPTS by literary theorists and historians to find more integrative ways of studying early modern societies and cultures, fairly essentialist notions of the difference between Europe and the rest of the world continue to persist in scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Svetoslav Manoulov. Joseph De Mestre
    ALMANACH VIA EVRASIA, 2013, 2 Svetoslav Manoilov, Dr. (Russian History) Eurasia center VIA EVRASIA JOSEPH DE MESTRE AND THE ORIGINS OF THE RUSSIAN CONSERVATISM One of the most important preconditions for the spread of the European conservatism in Russia was the residence of some members of this political party in the empire. Russia was one of the favourite places for settlement of French immigrants as they join its military and civil service. One of the main representatives of European conservatism living in Russia since the beginning of the XIX century was Joseph de Maistre. This study examines the stay of Joseph de Maistre in the Eastern empire, his impact on the Russian society, and particularly, his influence in the foundation of the Russian conservative ideology. His impact on the conservative ideology in Europe is so significant that even nowadays his personality and political philosophy arise interest among scholars. However, there are controversial opinions in historiography. R. Triomphe1 defines him as "an ideologue of absolute power and mystical materialism". I. Berlin2 as “cruel prophet of our time and precursor of fascism”, J.-L. Darcell3 as “cosmopolitan searching for unity”. F. Verimiale4 studies the years in exile of Joseph de Maistre, J. Murray5 - his political philosophy. Another interesting research is that of C. Armenteros, 1 Triomphe, R. Joseph de Maistre. Etude sur la vie et sur la doctrine d'un materialiste mystique (Geneve, 1968). 2 Berlin, I. Joseph de Maistre and the origins of Fascism (The New York Rewiew of Books, 1990). 3 Darcel, J.-L. La «conversion» de J. de Maistre (1789-1791): a propos de notes marginales attribuees a J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collapse of the Soviet Union (Part 1) Introduction
    IntroductionKramer SPECIAL ISSUE: The Collapse of the Soviet Union (Part 1) Introduction ✣ The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 was remarkable because it occurred so suddenly and with so little violence, especially in Russia itself. Even now, more than a decade after the fact, the abrupt and largely peaceful end of Communist rule in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union seems nearly miraculous. History offers no previous instances in which revolutionary polit- ical and social change of this magnitude transpired with almost no violence. When large, multiethnic empires disintegrated in the past, their demise usu- ally came after extensive warfare and bloodshed.1 As late as mid-August 1991, just before an attempted coup d’état in Moscow, few if any observers expected that the Soviet Communist regime—and the Soviet state as a whole—would simply dissolve in a nonviolent manner. Many long-standing Western theo- ries of revolution and political change will have to be revised to take account of the largely peaceful upheavals that culminated in the breakup of the Soviet Union. Despite the enormous signiªcance of the Soviet collapse, Western schol- ars have not yet adequately explained why and how it occurred. Although a plethora of articles and books on the subject have been published over the past eleven years, the cumulative results of this research have been modest.2 The basic chronology of events from 1985 through 1991 is well-known, but the details of many crucial episodes (such as the failed coup of August 1991) are as murky as ever. There has not yet been a systematic, in-depth assessment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Pye Phd Thesis
    IN THE BELLY OF THE BEAR? SOVIET-IRANIAN RELATIONS DURING THE REIGN OF MOHAMMAD REZA PAHLAVI Michael Pye A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/9501 This item is protected by original copyright IN THE BELLY OF THE BEAR? SOVIET-IRANIAN RELATIONS DURING THE REIGN OF MOHAMMAD REZA PAHLAVI CANDIDATE: MICHAEL PYE DEGREE: DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DATE OF SUBMISSION: 26TH OF MAY 2015 1 ABSTRACT The question mark of the project's title alludes to a critical reexamination of Soviet- Iranian relations during the period and aims to offer an original contribution to scholarship in the field by exploring an aspect of Pahlavi foreign relations that lacks any detailed treatment in the literature presently available. In pursuit of this goal, research has been concentrated on recently-released western archival documentation, the Iranian Studies collection held at the University of St Andrews, and similarly materials from the Russian Federal Archive for Foreign Relations, to which the author was granted access, including ambassadorial papers relating to the premiership of Mohammad Mosaddeq. As far as can be ascertained, the majority of the Russian archival evidence presented in the dissertation has not been previously been utilised by any Western-based scholar. At core, the thesis argues that the trajectory of Pahlavi foreign relations specifically (and to a certain degree Mohammad Reza's regency more broadly) owed principally to a deeply-rooted belief in, and perceived necessity to guard against, the Soviet Union's (and Russia's) historical 'objectives' vis-à-vis Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/30/2021 05:40:26AM Via Free Access
    1. The rise of an unstable century At the dawn of the twentieth century, the European powers confronted two major geopolitical weaknesses. The first one related to the future of the Tsarist Empire, the second to the escalating fragmentation of the so-called “sick man of Europe”, that is, the Ottoman Empire and, broadly speaking, the Balkan Peninsula. In reality, since 1809, the European powers were concerned about a potential “booming revolution” in the Tsarist Empire.1 The debates were vivid among intellectuals and in political circles, but they reached their peak when the 1905 revolution threatened, for a while, the implosion of Russia and the stability of Europe. Until that moment, reactionary circles feared that any reform – including those introduced during the Enlightenment, those dealing with the educa- tional reform, and those related to the foundation of the Academy – would encourage the lower popular strata and potentially most of the peasants to a rebellion. Joseph de Maistre and the Marquis de Coustine, for example, as well as the Slavophiles in Russia belonged to this mainstream. Others, by contrast, believed that the autocratic regime, particularly promoted by Nicholas I, was so refractory to any reform that the only way to achieve change was by revolution. From Narodniks to Anarchists and Marxists, several schools of thought, both in Russia and in Western Europe, nur- tured that belief. To a large extent, these opinions were mainly connected to the unbalanced social relations in the Tsarist Empire, that is, the polari- zation between landowners and peasantry, as well as the industrial – and the broader economic – backwardness of the country.
    [Show full text]