Practice Test Minerals Ms. Pierce

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Practice Test Minerals Ms. Pierce Practice Test Minerals Ms. Pierce 1. Silicate minerals contain the elements silicon and oxygen. Which list contains only silicate materials? 1) graphite, talc, and selenite gypsum 2) potassium feldspar, quartz, and amphibole 3) calcite, dolomite, and pyroxene 4) biotite mica, fluorite, and garnet 2. Which mineral is the major component of drywall? 1) talc 2) calcite 3) muscovite mica 4) selenite gypsum 3. Most rock gypsum is formed by the 1) heating of previously existing foliated bedrock 2) cooling and solidification of lava 3) compaction and cementation of shells and skeletal remains 4) chemical precipitation of minerals from seawater 4. The diagrams below represent the crystal shape and type of cleavage of two different minerals. The crystal shape and type of cleavage of these two minerals are determined mainly by the minerals' 1) color and type of luster 2) streak and hardness 3) composition and atomic arrangement 4) density and magnetism Minerals 5. The data table below gives characteristics of the gemstone peridot. Peridot is a form of the mineral 1) pyrite 2) pyroxene 3) olivine 4) garnet Base your answers to questions 6 and 7 on the data table below and on your knowledge of Earth science. The table provides information about four minerals, A through D. 6. Which mineral can scratch A, B, and C, but can not scratch D? 1) talc 2) selenite gypsum 3) fluorite 4) quartz 7. The diagram below represents a sample of mineral A. Mineral A is most likely 1) garnet 2) galena 3) olivine 4) halite 8. Which two properties are most useful in distinguishing between galena and halite? 1) cleavage and color 2) luster and color 3) hardness and streak 4) streak and cleavage Minerals Base your answers to questions 9 and 10 on the data table below, which lists some properties of four minerals that are used as ores of zinc (Zn). 9. Which mineral belongs in the same mineral group as quartz and olivine? 1) zincite 2) willemite 3) sphalerite 4) smithsonite 10. A mineral with a hardness of 5 would scratch 1) all four zinc minerals in the table 2) zincite, but not sphalerite, smithsonite, or willemite 3) zincite and sphalerite, but not smithsonite or willemite 4) zincite, sphalerite, and smithsonite, but not willemite Minerals Base your answers to questions 11 and 12 on the diagram below, which shows the results of three different physical tests, A, B, and C, that were performed on a mineral. 11. The luster of this mineral could be determined by 1) using an electronic balance 2) using a graduated cylinder 3) observing how light reflects from the surface of the mineral 4) observing what happens when acid is placed on the mineral 12. Which mineral was tested? 1) amphibole 2) quartz 3) galena 4) graphite 13. How are the minerals biotite mica and muscovite mica different? 1) Biotite mica is colorless, but muscovite mica is not. 2) Biotite mica contains iron and/or magnesium, but muscovite mica does not. 3) Muscovite mica scratches quartz, but biotite mica does not. 4) Muscovite mica cleaves into thin sheets, but biotite mica does not. 14. Which mineral is composed of Calcium and Fluorine? 1) Amphiboles 2) Calcite 3) Hematite 4) Fluorite Minerals 15. Base your answer to the following question on the table below which provides information about the crystal sizes and the mineral compositions of four igneous rocks, A, B, C, and D. The mineral quartz in rock A is composed of the two most abundant elements by mass in Earth's crust. These two elements are oxygen and 1) magnesium 2) silicon 3) iron 4) lead 16. The diagrams below show the crystal shapes of two 17. The diagram below shows how a sample of the minerals. mineral mica breaks when hit with a rock hammer. This mineral breaks in smooth, flat surfaces because it 1) is very hard 2) is very dense 3) contains large amounts of iron Quartz and halite have different crystal shapes 4) has a regular arrangement of atoms primarily because 18. In order to make observations, an observer must 1) light reflects from crystal surfaces always use 2) energy is released during crystallization 1) experiments 3) of impurities that produce surface variations 2) the senses 4) of the internal arrangement of the atoms 3) proportions 4) mathematical calculations Minerals 19. Which statement about a rock sample is most likely Base your answers to questions 24 through 26 on the an inference? diagrams below, which represent two different solid, uniform materials cut into cubes A and B. 1) The rock has flat sides and sharp corners. 2) The rock is made of small, dark-colored crystals. 3) The rock has thin, distinct layers. 4) The rock has changed color due to weathering. 20. Base your answer to the following question on the image provided below. 24. What is the mass of cube B? 1) 9 g 2) 27 g 3) 3 g 4) 81 g 25. If a parcel of air is heated, its density will 1) decrease 2) increase 3) remain the same If each side of the cube shown above has the same 26. Assume cube B was broken into many irregularly length as the measured side, what is the approximate shaped pieces. Compared to the density of the entire volume of the cube? cube, the density of one of the pieces would be 1) 2.20 cm3 2) 4.84 cm3 1) less 2) greater 3) 6.60 cm3 4) 10.65 cm3 3) the same 21. The diameter through the equator of Jupiter is about 143,000 kilometers. What is this distance written in 27. The data table below shows the mass and volume of scientific notation (powers of 10)? four different minerals. 1) 143 × 102 km 2) 1.43 × 103 km 3) 1.43 × 105 km 4) 143 × 105 km 22. Which term is best defined as a measure of the amount of space a substance occupies? 1) mass 2) volume 3) density 4) weight Which mineral has the greatest density? 23. A student incorrectly measured the volume of a 1) A 2) B 3) C 4) D mineral sample as 83 cubic centimeters when the actual volume was 89 cubic centimeters. What was the student’s approximate percent deviation (percentage of error)? 1) 6.7% 2) 7.2% 3) 9.3% 4) 14.8% Minerals 28. The graph below shows world population beginning 29. The graph below shows the tidal changes in ocean in the year 1800 and projected to the year 2000. water level, in meters, recorded at a coastal location on a certain day. The graph shows the greatest increase in population between 1) 1825 and 1850 2) 1875 and 1900 Approximately how many hours apart were the two 3) 1925 and 1950 4) 1975 and 2000 high tides? 1) 6 h 2) 12 h 3) 18 h 4) 24 h.
Recommended publications
  • Zincite (Zn, Mn2+)O
    Zincite (Zn, Mn2+)O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 6mm. Crystals rare, typically pyramidal, hemimorphic, with large {0001}, to 2.5 cm, rarely curved; in broad cleavages, foliated, granular, compact, massive. Twinning: On {0001}, with composition plane {0001}. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {1010}, perfect; parting on {0001}, commonly distinct. Fracture: Conchoidal. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 4 VHN = 205–221 (100 g load). D(meas.) = 5.66(2) D(calc.) = 5.6730 Rare pale yellow fluorescence under LW UV. Optical Properties: Translucent, transparent in thin fragments. Color: Yellow-orange to deep red, rarely yellow, green, colorless; deep red to yellow in transmitted light; light rose-brown in reflected light, with strong red to yellow internal reflections. Streak: Yellow-orange. Luster: Subadamantine to resinous. Optical Class: Uniaxial (+). ω = 2.013 = 2.029 R1–R2: (400) 13.0–13.6, (420) 12.8–13.2, (440) 12.6–12.8, (460) 12.3–12.6, (480) 12.1–12.4, (500) 12.0–12.2, (520) 11.8–12.1, (540) 11.8–12.0, (560) 11.7–11.9, (580) 11.6–11.8, (600) 11.4–11.7, (620) 11.3–11.6, (640) 11.2–11.5, (660) 11.1–11.4, (680) 11.0–11.2, (700) 11.0–11.2 Cell Data: Space Group: P 63mc (synthetic). a = 3.24992(5) c = 5.20658(8) Z = 2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Synthetic. 2.476 (100), 2.816 (71), 2.602 (56), 1.626 (40), 1.477 (35), 1.911 (29), 1.379 (28) Chemistry: (1) (2) SiO2 0.08 FeO 0.01 0.23 MnO 0.27 0.29 ZnO 99.63 98.88 Total 99.99 [99.40] (1) Sterling Hill, New Jersey, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Scanned
    American Mineralogist, Volume 70, pages 379-387, 1985 Ma_nganesehumites and leucophoenicitesfrom Franklin and Sterling- Hill' NewJersev: 'i"? andimplications ;ifi':il1,;;lfiil11"r's' Perr J. Dullx Department of Mineral Sciences Smithsonian lnstitution, Washington, D. C. 20560 Abstract The manganesehumites, (alleghanyite, manganhumite, and sonolite),together with some Mn-bearing samplesof the Mg-humites,and the related phasesleucophoenicite and jerry- gibbsite,from the orebodiesat Franklin and SterlingHill, New Jersey,are describedtogether with analytical data. Solid solution betweenhumite and manganhumiteis at least partially continuous. Expected Mn/Mg solid solutions between alleghanyiteand chondrodite, and betweensonolite and clinohumite, are discontinuous; they are interrupted by apparently orderedphases. In all cases,the possibleorderings involve Zn as well as Mn and Mg. There are no Mn end-membersof the manganesehumites at this locality. Manganeseis apparently restricted in leucophoenicite(5.42-6.63 Mn per 7 octahedral cations) and in jerrygibbsite (7.79-8.02Mn per 9 octahedralcations). Calcium is common to both leucophoeniciteand jerrygibbsite,but among the Mn-humites,only sonoliteaccepts appreciable Ca (0.65Ca per 9 octahedralcations). There is a "threshold" level ofzinc in all studiedsamples; this "threshold" levelis a constantfor leucophoenicite1-9.3 Znper 3 Si)and alleghanyite(-O.2Zn per 2 Si). No samplesof leucophoeniciteor jerrygibbsite were found to be Zn-ftee,suggesting either that Zn is required for their stability, or that these two phasesmight not be stable as end-members.Fluorine is present in all the Mn-humites and is proportional to the Mg- content,but is absentin leucophoeniciteand jerrygibbsite. Introduction humite speciesoccur there; the Mg-humites occur in the The magnesiumhumite species(norbergite, chondrodite, host Franklin Marble for the most part, and the Mn- humite, and clinohumite) have been well-studiedand re- humites in the orebodiesthemselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Leucophoenicite Mn (Sio4)3(OH)2
    2+ Leucophoenicite Mn7 (SiO4)3(OH)2 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2=m: Crystals rare, typically slender, prismatic, elongated and striated [010], to 8 mm; in isolated grains or granular massive. Twinning: On k 001 , common, contact or interpenetrant twins, lamellar. f g Physical Properties: Cleavage: 001 , imperfect. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 5.5{6 f g D(meas.) = 3.848 D(calc.) = [4.01] Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Brown to light purple-red, raspberry-red, deep pink to light pink; rose-red to colorless in thin section. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial ({). Pleochroism: Faint; rose-red 001 ; colorless 001 . Orientation: k f g ? f g X 001 cleavage. Dispersion: r > v; slight. ® = 1.751(3) ¯ = 1.771(3) ° = 1.782(3) ? f g 2V(meas.) = 74(5)± Cell Data: Space Group: P 21=a: a = 10.842(19) b = 4.826(6) c = 11.324(9) ¯ = 103:93(9)± Z = [2] X-ray Powder Pattern: Franklin, New Jersey, USA. 1.8063 (10), 2.877 (9), 2.684 (8), 4.36 (5), 3.612 (5), 2.365 (5), 2.620 (4) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) SiO2 26.36 26.7 26.7 CaO 5.67 2.4 2.8 FeO trace 0.3 0.3 Na2O 0.39 MnO 60.63 62.8 64.7 K2O 0.24 ZnO 3.87 0.0 0.0 H2O 2.64 [2.3] [2.8] MgO 0.21 5.5 2.7 Total 100.01 [100.0] [100.0] (1) Franklin, New Jersey, USA; composite of two analyses, corresponding to (Mn5:89Ca0:70Zn0:32 Na0:04Mg0:03K0:01)§=6:99(Si1:01O4)3(OH)2: (2) Kombat mine, Namibia; by electron microprobe, H2O by di®erence; corresponding to (Mn5:98Mg0:92Ca0:29Fe0:02)§=7:21(SiO4)3(OH)1:72: (3) Valsesia-Valtournanche area, Italy; by electron microprobe, H2O by di®erence; corresponding to (Mn6:16Mg0:45Ca0:34Fe0:03)§=6:98(SiO4)3(OH)2:10: Mineral Group: Leucophoenicite group.
    [Show full text]
  • TEPHROITE from FRANKLIN, NEW JERSEY* Connbrrus S. Hunrsur
    THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL 46, MAY_JUNE, 1961 TEPHROITE FROM FRANKLIN, NEW JERSEY* ConNBrrus S. Hunrsur, Jn., Departmentof Mineralogy, Harvard, Uniaersity. Assrnlcr A study of tephroite specimens from Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey showed in all of them the presence of thin sheets of willemite believed to be a product of exsolution. .fhese sheets are oriented parallel to the {100} and [010] planes of tephroite with the o and r axes of tephroite and willemite parallel. It is believed that Iittle zinc remains in the tephroite structure and that much of it reported in chemical analyses has been con- tributed by intergrown u'illemite. This conclusion is supported by experiments syn- thesizing tephroite. The indices of refraction and d spacing of {130} vary as would be expected with changes in amounts of MgO, FeO and CaO. INrnooucrroN 'fephroite, Mn2SiO4,a member of the olivine group, was describedas a new mineral from SterlingHill by Breithaupt in 1823.A chemicalanal- ysis of the original material was published by Brush (1864) together with severaladditional chemical analysesof tephroite made by others. These analysesreport ZnO in varying amounts which Brush attributed to invariably associatedzincite. Palache (1937) did not agree with Brush and stated " . that the molecularratios in someanalyses more nearly satisfy the orthosilicateformula when zinc is regardedas essen- tially a part of the mineral rather than as a constituent of mechanical inclusions." The present study was undertaken for the purpose of in- vestigatingthe variations in the propertiesof tephroite with changesin chemical composition, particularly the effect of zinc. Relationships were not expectedto be simplefor analysesshow, in addition to ZnO, variable amounts of MgO, FeO, and CaO.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Primitive Radio Detector Minerals H.P
    Sheet1 Useful Primitive Radio Detector Minerals H.P. Friedichs, AC7ZL Chemical Chemical Crystal PW Eccles Toricata Morgan Mineral Composition Formula Category Suitable Contacts (1925) (1928) (1910) (1913) Allemontite Arsenic antimonide AsSb Antimonide x Anatase Titanium dioxide TiO2 Oxide Metals and Zincite x x Antimony Element Sb Element Zincite, silicon, etc. x Argentite (silver glance) Silver sulfide Ag2S Sulfide Metals, graphite, tellurium x Arkansite See Anatase x Arsenic Element As Element Metals and Zincite x x x Arsenic pyrites See Mispickel x Bornite (peacock Sulfide of copper and ore) iron Cu5FeS4 Sulfide Zincite, silicon, etc. x x x x Boron Element B Element Zincite, tellurium x x Sulfide of antimony Boulangerite and lead Pb5Sb4S11 Sulfosalt x Sulfide of copper, Zincite, tellurium, Bourmonite antimony and lead PbCuSbS3 Sulfosalt antimony, bismuth x Brookite See Anatase x x Carborundum Silicon Carbide SiC Steel, zincite x Zincite (this combination is Sulfide of iron and the famous Perikon Chalcopyrite copper CuFeS2 Sulfide detector) x x x Cobaltite Cobalt arsenic sulfide CoAsS Zincite x x Cassiterite Tin Oxide SnO2 Oxide Metals x x Cerussite Lead Carbonate PbCo3 Carbonate ?x Chalcocite (copper glance) Copper sulfide Cu2S Sulfide Zincite, tellurium x x x Zincite (this combination is Sulfide of iron and the famous Perikon Copper pyrites copper CuFeS2 Sulfide detector) x x Corundum Aluminum oxidde Al2O3 Oxide Zincite, bornite x Page 1 Sheet1 Covellite Copper sulfide CuS Sulfide Zincite, etc x x Cuprite (Cuprous oxide) Copper oxide
    [Show full text]
  • Base Your Answers to Questions 1 and 2 on the Diagram Below, Which Shows the Results of Three Different Physical Tests, A, B, and C, That Were Performed on a Mineral
    Base your answers to questions 1 and 2 on the diagram below, which shows the results of three different physical tests, A, B, and C, that were performed on a mineral. 1. The luster of this mineral could be determined by A) using an electronic balance B) using a graduated cylinder C) observing how light reflects from the surface of the mineral D) observing what happens when acid is placed on the mineral 2. Which mineral was tested? A) amphibole B) quartz C) galena D) graphite 3. Different arrangements of tetrahedra in the silicate group of minerals result in differences in the minerals' A) age, density, and smoothness B) cleavage, color, and abundance C) hardness, cleavage, and crystal shape D) chemical composition, size, and origin 4. The diagram of Bowen's Reaction Series below indicates the relative temperatures at which specific minerals crystallize as magma cools. Which statement is best supported by Bowen's Reaction Series? A) Most minerals crystallize at the same temperature. B) Most felsic minerals usually crystallize before most mafic minerals. C) Muscovite mica and quartz are the last minerals to crystallize as magma cools. D) Biotite mica is the first mineral to crystallize as magma cools. Base your answers to questions 5 through 8 on the 6. Moh's scale arranges minerals according to their data table below. relative A) resistance to breaking B) resistance to scratching C) specific heat D) specific gravity 7. Which statement is best supported by the data shown? A) An iron nail contains fluorite. B) A streak plate is composed of quartz.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerrygibbsite Mn (Sio4)
    2+ Jerrygibbsite Mn9 (SiO4)4(OH)2 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: mm2 (probable), or 2=m 2=m 2=m: As interlocking anhedral crystals, to 2 mm. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Imperfect on 001 . Hardness = 5.5 D(meas.) = 4.00(2) D(calc.) = 4.045 f g » Optical Properties: Transparent and translucent lamellae alternating 001 . Color: Violet-pink, with a brownish tinge; light pink in thin section. Strekakf: Light pink. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial ({). Orientation: X = b; Y = c; Z = a. Dispersion: r > v; moderate. ® = 1.772(4) ¯ = 1.783(4) ° = 1.789(4) 2V(meas.) = 72± Cell Data: Space Group: P bn21 (probable), or P bnm: a = 4.875(2) b = 10.709(6) c = 28.18(2) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Franklin, New Jersey, USA. 2.557 (100), 1.806 (100), 2.869 (78), 2.752 (49), 2.702 (46), 2.362 (39), 2.661 (34) Chemistry: (1) SiO2 27.1 FeO 0.3 MnO 64.1 ZnO 3.9 MgO 1.4 CaO 0.4 F 0.0 H2O 2.13 Total 99.3 (1) Franklin, New Jersey, USA; by electron microprobe, H2O by the Pen¯eld method; corresponds to (Mn7:86Zn0:59Mg0:24Ca0:16Fe0:14)§=8:99(SiO4)4(OH)2: Polymorphism & Series: Dimorphous with sonolite. Mineral Group: Leucophoenicite group. Occurrence: In a metamorphosed stratiform Zn-Mn deposit. Association: Franklinite, willemite, zincite, sonolite, leucophoenicite, tephroite. Distribution: From Franklin, Sussex Co., New Jersey, USA. Name: In honor of Professor Gerald V. Gibbs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of 1850S Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S
    Identification of 1850s Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S. Capitol Author(s): Frank S. Welsh Source: APT Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 1 (2008), pp. 17-30 Published by: Association for Preservation Technology International (APT) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25433934 Accessed: 25/12/2009 10:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aptech. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Association for Preservation Technology International (APT) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to APT Bulletin. http://www.jstor.org Identification of 1850s Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gahnite-Franklinite Intergrowths at the Sterling Hill Zinc Deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey: an Analytical and Experimental Study
    Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Theses and Dissertations 1-1-1978 Gahnite-franklinite intergrowths at the Sterling Hill zinc deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey: An analytical and experimental study. Antone V. Carvalho Follow this and additional works at: http://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Carvalho, Antone V., "Gahnite-franklinite intergrowths at the Sterling Hill zinc deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey: An analytical and experimental study." (1978). Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2136. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GAHNITE-FRANKLINITE INTERGROWTHS AT THE STERLING HILL ZINC DEPOSIT, SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY: AN ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY by Antone V. Carvalho III A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Committee of Lehigh University in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Science in Geological Sciences Lehigh University 1978 ProQuest Number: EP76409 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest EP76409 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 65, the Minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey, 1962
    THEMINERALSOF FRANKLINAND STERLINGHILL NEWJERSEY BULLETIN 65 NEW JERSEYGEOLOGICALSURVEY DEPARTMENTOF CONSERVATIONAND ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 65 THE MINERALS OF FRANKLIN AND STERLING HILL, NEW JERSEY bY ALBERT S. WILKERSON Professor of Geology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey STATE OF NEw JERSEY Department of Conservation and Economic Development H. MAT ADAMS, Commissioner Division of Resource Development KE_rr_ H. CR_V_LINCDirector, Bureau of Geology and Topography KEMBLEWIDX_, State Geologist TRENTON, NEW JERSEY --1962-- NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ......................................... 5 History of Area ................................... 7 General Geology ................................... 9 Origin of the Ore Deposits .......................... 10 The Rowe Collection ................................ 11 List of 42 Mineral Species and Varieties First Found at Franklin or Sterling Hill .......................... 13 Other Mineral Species and Varieties at Franklin or Sterling Hill ............................................ 14 Tabular Summary of Mineral Discoveries ................. 17 The Luminescent Minerals ............................ 22 Corrections to Franklln-Sterling Hill Mineral List of Dis- credited Species, Incorrect Names, Usages, Spelling and Identification .................................... 23 Description of Minerals: Bementite ......................................... 25 Cahnite ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Behavior of Zn-Bearing Phases in Base Metal Slag from France and Poland: a Mineralogical Approach for Environmental Purposes
    Journal of Geochemical Exploration 136 (2014) 1–13 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Geochemical Exploration journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jgeoexp Behavior of Zn-bearing phases in base metal slag from France and Poland: A mineralogical approach for environmental purposes Maxime Vanaecker a, Alexandra Courtin-Nomade a,⁎,HubertBrila, Jacky Laureyns b,Jean-FrançoisLenaina a Université de Limoges, GRESE, E.A. 4330, IFR 145 GEIST, F.S.T., 123 Avenue A. Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France b Université de Lille 1, USTL, LASIR, C5, BP 69, 59652 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France article info abstract Article history: Slag samples from three pyrometallurgical sites (two in France, one in Poland) were studied for their Zn-phase con- Received 18 February 2013 tent, evolution and potential release of metals over time. Mineral assemblages were observed and analyzed using Accepted 3 September 2013 various complementary tools and approaches: chemical extractions, optical microscopy, cathodoluminescence, Available online 12 September 2013 X-ray diffraction, Scanning Electron Microscopy, ElectronProbeMicro-Analysis,andmicro-Raman spectrometry. The primary assemblages are composed of analogs to willemite, hardystonite, zincite, wurtzite, petedunnite and Keywords: franklinite. Some of these phases are sensitive to alteration (e.g., deuteric processes during cooling and by Slag fi Weathering weathering) and, as a result, goslarite, smithsonite and hemimorphite have been identi ed as secondary products. Zn-phase stability In comparing these results to the geochemical conditions at each site in relation to mineralogical investigations, Melilites different steps of Zn-rich mineral destabilization could be identified. This procedure allows assessing potential Raman spectroscopy environmental impacts due to a release of metals that may contain slag.
    [Show full text]
  • Gageite (Mn ; Mg; Zn)42Si16o54(OH)40 C 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic, Pseudotetragonal, Or Triclinic
    2+ Gageite (Mn ; Mg; Zn)42Si16O54(OH)40 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic, pseudotetragonal, or triclinic. Point Group: 2=m or 1: Minute laths or saddlelike crystals grouped radially, in bundles, or as matted ¯bers. Physical Properties: Cleavage: 110 , pronounced. Hardness = 3 D(meas.) = 3.46{3.584 D(calc.) = 3.599 f g Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Colorless, pale pink, pale brown. Luster: Highly vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial ({). Orientation: Z ¯ber length. Dispersion: r < v; extreme. ® = 1.723(3) ¯ = 1.734(3) ° = 1.736(3) k2V(meas.) = n.d. Cell Data: Space Group: P 2=n: a = 19.42 b = 19.42 c = 9.84 ¯ = 89:5± Z = [1], or Space Group: P 1: a = 14.17 b = 14.07 c = 9.84 ® = 76:5± ¯ = 76:6± ° = 86:9± Z = [1] X-ray Powder Pattern: Franklin, New Jersey, USA. 6.87 (100), 2.758 (80), 2.707 (80), 3.44 (60), 3.25 (60), 2.556 (60), 1.6742 (60) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) SiO2 24.71 23.58 23.90 Al2O3 0.15 FeO 0.03 0.20 MnO 50.19 53.74 51.06 ZnO 8.76 3.96 4.30 MgO 11.91 9.95 11.34 CaO 0.19 H2O [4.43] 8.24 [9.01] Total [100.00] 99.65 [100.00] (1) Franklin, New Jersey, USA; H2O by di®erence. (2) Do. (3) Do.; by electron microprobe, average of seven analyses, H2O by di®erence; corresponds to (Mn28:95Mg11:32Zn2:13 Ca0:14Fe0:11)§=42:65Si16O54:53(OH)40:23: Polymorphism & Series: 2M, 1A polytypes.
    [Show full text]