Identification of 1850S Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Identification of 1850S Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S Identification of 1850s Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S. Capitol Author(s): Frank S. Welsh Source: APT Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 1 (2008), pp. 17-30 Published by: Association for Preservation Technology International (APT) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25433934 Accessed: 25/12/2009 10:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aptech. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Association for Preservation Technology International (APT) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to APT Bulletin. http://www.jstor.org Identification of 1850s Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S. Capitol FRANK S. WELSH Research and analyses disclose that Introduction white lead and application of lead-based brown, zinc-based primer used on paints. Recent investigations of interior paints The findings of this project add not 1850s cast iron at the U.S. Capitol in the 1850s House and Senate of wings to the of the construction of the United States have revealed only history contains made from the Capitol more pigments the U.S. Capitol but also, and for the first time the original brown zinc crushed ore of franklinite and zincite significantly, to the history of zinc-paint paints that were made by the New manufacture and the use of minerals as advertised by the New Jersey Zinc Zinc inNewark, New Jersey Company architectural in this as a paint pigments Jersey. Used factory-applied, rust Company. in the mid-nineteenth on country century. inhibitive primer the cast-iron door Much has been written about zinc and window enframements installed at paints and the Franklin-area mines; however, the this contains unusual Capitol, paint until the at the the that were made discovery Capitol, pigments by crushing use of crushed franklinite and zincite ore franklinite and zincite ore from the as an pigments in architectural paint celebrated Franklin and Sterling Hill was never studied in detail. Identifica mines in Sussex County in northwestern tion of these minerals can be used as a New Jersey. reliable benchmark for and/or The New Zinc was dating Jersey Company a authenticating layer. The results one of the first manufacturers of zinc paint that future studies oxide and zinc-based architectural and suggest published concerning zinc pigments should include industrial paint inAmerica. In addition a more accurate of their manu to the also made at least history white, company facture franklinite and zincite in seven other colors of zinc using paint, espe the mid-1800s in America. cially brown, for use principally as primers on metals but also for finish coats on exterior wood surfaces. The ore Identification of Brown Zinc Paint at the from which American-made zinc paint Capitol was first manufactured was discovered The Capitol was constructed in the late in Franklin, New in the cen Jersey, eigh eighteenth and early nineteenth ore teenth century. The contained many was turies. It greatly expanded between minerals of different colors and compo 1850 and 1867 with the addition of sition, the primary ones, including north and south wings and a new cast zincite and which occur ? franklinite, iron dome all designed by architect nowhere else on earth. Thomas U. Walter and overseen by The of the Franklin-area history engineer Capt. Montgomery C. Meigs. mines and the zinc extracted from the The extension project, as it was ore are linked. The mines two inextricably called, comprised the wings that and innovative manufacturing processes housed new House and Senate chambers to gave birth the zinc pigment, zinc new cere plus offices, meeting rooms, paint, and ready-mixed-paint industries monial spaces, grand staircases, and in America. The nineteenth-century elegant corridors (Fig. 1). Fireproofing incentive for the and manufac mining was a great concern to Walter and oth turing industries to develop zinc oxide after the British burned Fig. 1. The United States Capitol, 1867, looking ers, especially as an alternative white for southwest, as the 1850s extension project pigment the Capitol in 1814. Consequently, architectural and industrial was designed by Thomas U. Walter was nearing paints Walter elected to trim all of the new completion. The north (Senate) wing is in created the health by significant prob door and window openings with cast south (House) wing is in back foreground; lems associated with the manufacture of or iron casings enframements (Walter ground. Courtesy of the Architect of the Capitol. 17 18 APT BULLETIN: JOURNAL OF PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGY / 39:1, 2008 and called them Meigs window and ments. These projects started in 2002 in ings and ornaments in order to get the door The door dressings). enframements Senate Office S-312 with the Office of thickest layer evidence, since paint tends in the were basement manufactured by the Senate Curator and continued in to accumulate in crevices and corners. the Baltimore firm of as a Hayward, Bartlett 2004 part of window-shutter survey The samples from the various fea and but the basement win tures were Company, throughout the Capitol with the Office analyzed microscopically, dows and all door and window en of the Curator of the Architect of the initially in a loose fractured state under framements well as all (as ornamental Capitol. In 2005 the project culminated the stereomicroscope and afterward in and in the cross ceilings gallery fronts) upper with taking additional samples from mounted sections. All samples floors were manufactured, starting in door and window enframements in exhibited the same brownish gray, oil 1855, by Janes, Beebe and Company of other offices and public spaces in order based, shop-prime paint layer(s). The New York.1 to distribute the locations of samples color of the paint varies little from of the more than to Many 600 cast-iron throughout the first, second, and third sample sample and is very close to door and window enframements have floors in both wings. The basement the Munsell color reference value of detailed ornamental on moldings their rooms, dome, and ceilings were not 2.5 YR 6/1. This color is described in are so architraves, all of which finely sampled. the National Bureau of Standards Color executed that when finish painted they This last stage was unusual in that it Name Charts as Light Brownish Gray. resemble carved and on a exquisitely molded focused prime paint layer, in con Stereomicroscopical studies show wood Walter have even trast to most (Fig. 2). may paint analysis, which that this brownish gray paint layer that Beebe and a specified Janes, Com typically concentrates on finish paint contains number of very colorful and enframents be before rare - pany primed ship layers and their colors. It is that unusually large (0.1 0.25mm), coarsely as he did with ment, the castings for the pigments in architectural paints are ground yellow, orange, red, and black in even more Congressional Library 1853, giving analyzed, and so for those pigment particles. Their size, color, and instructions "to the with can be as a paint castings that categorized shop primers. appearance in paint film were totally two coats to before shipping, prevent This project focused specifically on the unfamiliar. Upon initial inspection they rust and to a foundation for unusual did not share lay good color of and the pigments used any characteristics of paint the ornamental painter."2 to make the brownish gray oil primer on pigments heretofore seen or described in three the door Recently, during separate paint and window enframements in standard artist-pigment references (Fig. investigation and analysis projects Senate Office S-312 and on all other 3). the throughout first, second, and third door and window enframements subse To identify these unknown pigments floors of the interior of the north (Sen quently sampled. and, subsequently, their source and and south brown ate) (House) wings, Numerous sites from door and win fascinating history of manufacture, they zinc was identified for the first dow in rooms were paint enframements eight in analyzed microscopically and time as the on the mid-1850s both were sam to primer wings investigated and instrumentally document their optical cast-iron door and window enframe pled. The selected spaces and features characteristics and chemical composi are representative from each floor and tion.3 wing. They included H-128, window enframements; H-218, window en framements; H-319, window enframe ments; and the west grand staircase third-floor door enframements in the south wing (House side) and S-128, window enframements; S-211, door 'mm^?M?^'^?^M' enframements; S-312, door enframe east ments; and the grand staircase third-floor door enframements in the north wing (Senate side). In a many cases, sample of the cast iron substrate could not be extracted with the paint layers intact, as is typi cally done with wood and plaster.
Recommended publications
  • THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE of CAHNITE, Cabaso4 (OH)4
    THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF CAHNITE, CaBAsO4 (OH)4 by Charles T. Prewitt S.B., M.I.T.AAT.rc (1955) SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL YULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (1960) Signature of Author .,. ..... .. ... .... Department of>Geolgy nd Geophysics, May 20, 1960 Certified by . t -.. 4-w.Vi 4 ... .. ... , . Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . .* . .... ... Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF CAHNITE, Ca2 BAs04 (OH)4 Charles T. Prewitt Submitted to the Department of Geology on May 20, 1960 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Cahnite is one of the few crystals which had been assigned to crystal class 4. A precession study showed that its diffraction sphol is 4/m I-/-, which contains space groups I4, I4E, and14/. Because of the known 4 morphology, it must be assigned to space group I4. The unit cell, whose dimensions are a = 7.11A, o = 6.201, contains two formula weights of Ca BAsO (OH)L. The structure was studied with the aid of in ensity medsurements made with a single-crystal diffractometer. Patterson s ntheses were first made for projections along the c, a, and 110 directions. The atomic numbers of the atoms are in the ratio As:Ca.0:B = 33:20:8:5, so that the Patterson peaks are dominated by the atom pairs containing arsenic as one member of the pair. Since there are only two arsenic atoms in a body-centered cell, one As can be arbitrarily assigned to the origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Zincite (Zn, Mn2+)O
    Zincite (Zn, Mn2+)O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 6mm. Crystals rare, typically pyramidal, hemimorphic, with large {0001}, to 2.5 cm, rarely curved; in broad cleavages, foliated, granular, compact, massive. Twinning: On {0001}, with composition plane {0001}. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {1010}, perfect; parting on {0001}, commonly distinct. Fracture: Conchoidal. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 4 VHN = 205–221 (100 g load). D(meas.) = 5.66(2) D(calc.) = 5.6730 Rare pale yellow fluorescence under LW UV. Optical Properties: Translucent, transparent in thin fragments. Color: Yellow-orange to deep red, rarely yellow, green, colorless; deep red to yellow in transmitted light; light rose-brown in reflected light, with strong red to yellow internal reflections. Streak: Yellow-orange. Luster: Subadamantine to resinous. Optical Class: Uniaxial (+). ω = 2.013 = 2.029 R1–R2: (400) 13.0–13.6, (420) 12.8–13.2, (440) 12.6–12.8, (460) 12.3–12.6, (480) 12.1–12.4, (500) 12.0–12.2, (520) 11.8–12.1, (540) 11.8–12.0, (560) 11.7–11.9, (580) 11.6–11.8, (600) 11.4–11.7, (620) 11.3–11.6, (640) 11.2–11.5, (660) 11.1–11.4, (680) 11.0–11.2, (700) 11.0–11.2 Cell Data: Space Group: P 63mc (synthetic). a = 3.24992(5) c = 5.20658(8) Z = 2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Synthetic. 2.476 (100), 2.816 (71), 2.602 (56), 1.626 (40), 1.477 (35), 1.911 (29), 1.379 (28) Chemistry: (1) (2) SiO2 0.08 FeO 0.01 0.23 MnO 0.27 0.29 ZnO 99.63 98.88 Total 99.99 [99.40] (1) Sterling Hill, New Jersey, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Scanned
    American Mineralogist, Volume 70, pages 379-387, 1985 Ma_nganesehumites and leucophoenicitesfrom Franklin and Sterling- Hill' NewJersev: 'i"? andimplications ;ifi':il1,;;lfiil11"r's' Perr J. Dullx Department of Mineral Sciences Smithsonian lnstitution, Washington, D. C. 20560 Abstract The manganesehumites, (alleghanyite, manganhumite, and sonolite),together with some Mn-bearing samplesof the Mg-humites,and the related phasesleucophoenicite and jerry- gibbsite,from the orebodiesat Franklin and SterlingHill, New Jersey,are describedtogether with analytical data. Solid solution betweenhumite and manganhumiteis at least partially continuous. Expected Mn/Mg solid solutions between alleghanyiteand chondrodite, and betweensonolite and clinohumite, are discontinuous; they are interrupted by apparently orderedphases. In all cases,the possibleorderings involve Zn as well as Mn and Mg. There are no Mn end-membersof the manganesehumites at this locality. Manganeseis apparently restricted in leucophoenicite(5.42-6.63 Mn per 7 octahedral cations) and in jerrygibbsite (7.79-8.02Mn per 9 octahedralcations). Calcium is common to both leucophoeniciteand jerrygibbsite,but among the Mn-humites,only sonoliteaccepts appreciable Ca (0.65Ca per 9 octahedralcations). There is a "threshold" level ofzinc in all studiedsamples; this "threshold" levelis a constantfor leucophoenicite1-9.3 Znper 3 Si)and alleghanyite(-O.2Zn per 2 Si). No samplesof leucophoeniciteor jerrygibbsite were found to be Zn-ftee,suggesting either that Zn is required for their stability, or that these two phasesmight not be stable as end-members.Fluorine is present in all the Mn-humites and is proportional to the Mg- content,but is absentin leucophoeniciteand jerrygibbsite. Introduction humite speciesoccur there; the Mg-humites occur in the The magnesiumhumite species(norbergite, chondrodite, host Franklin Marble for the most part, and the Mn- humite, and clinohumite) have been well-studiedand re- humites in the orebodiesthemselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Leucophoenicite Mn (Sio4)3(OH)2
    2+ Leucophoenicite Mn7 (SiO4)3(OH)2 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2=m: Crystals rare, typically slender, prismatic, elongated and striated [010], to 8 mm; in isolated grains or granular massive. Twinning: On k 001 , common, contact or interpenetrant twins, lamellar. f g Physical Properties: Cleavage: 001 , imperfect. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 5.5{6 f g D(meas.) = 3.848 D(calc.) = [4.01] Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Brown to light purple-red, raspberry-red, deep pink to light pink; rose-red to colorless in thin section. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial ({). Pleochroism: Faint; rose-red 001 ; colorless 001 . Orientation: k f g ? f g X 001 cleavage. Dispersion: r > v; slight. ® = 1.751(3) ¯ = 1.771(3) ° = 1.782(3) ? f g 2V(meas.) = 74(5)± Cell Data: Space Group: P 21=a: a = 10.842(19) b = 4.826(6) c = 11.324(9) ¯ = 103:93(9)± Z = [2] X-ray Powder Pattern: Franklin, New Jersey, USA. 1.8063 (10), 2.877 (9), 2.684 (8), 4.36 (5), 3.612 (5), 2.365 (5), 2.620 (4) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) SiO2 26.36 26.7 26.7 CaO 5.67 2.4 2.8 FeO trace 0.3 0.3 Na2O 0.39 MnO 60.63 62.8 64.7 K2O 0.24 ZnO 3.87 0.0 0.0 H2O 2.64 [2.3] [2.8] MgO 0.21 5.5 2.7 Total 100.01 [100.0] [100.0] (1) Franklin, New Jersey, USA; composite of two analyses, corresponding to (Mn5:89Ca0:70Zn0:32 Na0:04Mg0:03K0:01)§=6:99(Si1:01O4)3(OH)2: (2) Kombat mine, Namibia; by electron microprobe, H2O by di®erence; corresponding to (Mn5:98Mg0:92Ca0:29Fe0:02)§=7:21(SiO4)3(OH)1:72: (3) Valsesia-Valtournanche area, Italy; by electron microprobe, H2O by di®erence; corresponding to (Mn6:16Mg0:45Ca0:34Fe0:03)§=6:98(SiO4)3(OH)2:10: Mineral Group: Leucophoenicite group.
    [Show full text]
  • TEPHROITE from FRANKLIN, NEW JERSEY* Connbrrus S. Hunrsur
    THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL 46, MAY_JUNE, 1961 TEPHROITE FROM FRANKLIN, NEW JERSEY* ConNBrrus S. Hunrsur, Jn., Departmentof Mineralogy, Harvard, Uniaersity. Assrnlcr A study of tephroite specimens from Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey showed in all of them the presence of thin sheets of willemite believed to be a product of exsolution. .fhese sheets are oriented parallel to the {100} and [010] planes of tephroite with the o and r axes of tephroite and willemite parallel. It is believed that Iittle zinc remains in the tephroite structure and that much of it reported in chemical analyses has been con- tributed by intergrown u'illemite. This conclusion is supported by experiments syn- thesizing tephroite. The indices of refraction and d spacing of {130} vary as would be expected with changes in amounts of MgO, FeO and CaO. INrnooucrroN 'fephroite, Mn2SiO4,a member of the olivine group, was describedas a new mineral from SterlingHill by Breithaupt in 1823.A chemicalanal- ysis of the original material was published by Brush (1864) together with severaladditional chemical analysesof tephroite made by others. These analysesreport ZnO in varying amounts which Brush attributed to invariably associatedzincite. Palache (1937) did not agree with Brush and stated " . that the molecularratios in someanalyses more nearly satisfy the orthosilicateformula when zinc is regardedas essen- tially a part of the mineral rather than as a constituent of mechanical inclusions." The present study was undertaken for the purpose of in- vestigatingthe variations in the propertiesof tephroite with changesin chemical composition, particularly the effect of zinc. Relationships were not expectedto be simplefor analysesshow, in addition to ZnO, variable amounts of MgO, FeO, and CaO.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Primitive Radio Detector Minerals H.P
    Sheet1 Useful Primitive Radio Detector Minerals H.P. Friedichs, AC7ZL Chemical Chemical Crystal PW Eccles Toricata Morgan Mineral Composition Formula Category Suitable Contacts (1925) (1928) (1910) (1913) Allemontite Arsenic antimonide AsSb Antimonide x Anatase Titanium dioxide TiO2 Oxide Metals and Zincite x x Antimony Element Sb Element Zincite, silicon, etc. x Argentite (silver glance) Silver sulfide Ag2S Sulfide Metals, graphite, tellurium x Arkansite See Anatase x Arsenic Element As Element Metals and Zincite x x x Arsenic pyrites See Mispickel x Bornite (peacock Sulfide of copper and ore) iron Cu5FeS4 Sulfide Zincite, silicon, etc. x x x x Boron Element B Element Zincite, tellurium x x Sulfide of antimony Boulangerite and lead Pb5Sb4S11 Sulfosalt x Sulfide of copper, Zincite, tellurium, Bourmonite antimony and lead PbCuSbS3 Sulfosalt antimony, bismuth x Brookite See Anatase x x Carborundum Silicon Carbide SiC Steel, zincite x Zincite (this combination is Sulfide of iron and the famous Perikon Chalcopyrite copper CuFeS2 Sulfide detector) x x x Cobaltite Cobalt arsenic sulfide CoAsS Zincite x x Cassiterite Tin Oxide SnO2 Oxide Metals x x Cerussite Lead Carbonate PbCo3 Carbonate ?x Chalcocite (copper glance) Copper sulfide Cu2S Sulfide Zincite, tellurium x x x Zincite (this combination is Sulfide of iron and the famous Perikon Copper pyrites copper CuFeS2 Sulfide detector) x x Corundum Aluminum oxidde Al2O3 Oxide Zincite, bornite x Page 1 Sheet1 Covellite Copper sulfide CuS Sulfide Zincite, etc x x Cuprite (Cuprous oxide) Copper oxide
    [Show full text]
  • Base Your Answers to Questions 1 and 2 on the Diagram Below, Which Shows the Results of Three Different Physical Tests, A, B, and C, That Were Performed on a Mineral
    Base your answers to questions 1 and 2 on the diagram below, which shows the results of three different physical tests, A, B, and C, that were performed on a mineral. 1. The luster of this mineral could be determined by A) using an electronic balance B) using a graduated cylinder C) observing how light reflects from the surface of the mineral D) observing what happens when acid is placed on the mineral 2. Which mineral was tested? A) amphibole B) quartz C) galena D) graphite 3. Different arrangements of tetrahedra in the silicate group of minerals result in differences in the minerals' A) age, density, and smoothness B) cleavage, color, and abundance C) hardness, cleavage, and crystal shape D) chemical composition, size, and origin 4. The diagram of Bowen's Reaction Series below indicates the relative temperatures at which specific minerals crystallize as magma cools. Which statement is best supported by Bowen's Reaction Series? A) Most minerals crystallize at the same temperature. B) Most felsic minerals usually crystallize before most mafic minerals. C) Muscovite mica and quartz are the last minerals to crystallize as magma cools. D) Biotite mica is the first mineral to crystallize as magma cools. Base your answers to questions 5 through 8 on the 6. Moh's scale arranges minerals according to their data table below. relative A) resistance to breaking B) resistance to scratching C) specific heat D) specific gravity 7. Which statement is best supported by the data shown? A) An iron nail contains fluorite. B) A streak plate is composed of quartz.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerrygibbsite Mn (Sio4)
    2+ Jerrygibbsite Mn9 (SiO4)4(OH)2 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: mm2 (probable), or 2=m 2=m 2=m: As interlocking anhedral crystals, to 2 mm. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Imperfect on 001 . Hardness = 5.5 D(meas.) = 4.00(2) D(calc.) = 4.045 f g » Optical Properties: Transparent and translucent lamellae alternating 001 . Color: Violet-pink, with a brownish tinge; light pink in thin section. Strekakf: Light pink. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial ({). Orientation: X = b; Y = c; Z = a. Dispersion: r > v; moderate. ® = 1.772(4) ¯ = 1.783(4) ° = 1.789(4) 2V(meas.) = 72± Cell Data: Space Group: P bn21 (probable), or P bnm: a = 4.875(2) b = 10.709(6) c = 28.18(2) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Franklin, New Jersey, USA. 2.557 (100), 1.806 (100), 2.869 (78), 2.752 (49), 2.702 (46), 2.362 (39), 2.661 (34) Chemistry: (1) SiO2 27.1 FeO 0.3 MnO 64.1 ZnO 3.9 MgO 1.4 CaO 0.4 F 0.0 H2O 2.13 Total 99.3 (1) Franklin, New Jersey, USA; by electron microprobe, H2O by the Pen¯eld method; corresponds to (Mn7:86Zn0:59Mg0:24Ca0:16Fe0:14)§=8:99(SiO4)4(OH)2: Polymorphism & Series: Dimorphous with sonolite. Mineral Group: Leucophoenicite group. Occurrence: In a metamorphosed stratiform Zn-Mn deposit. Association: Franklinite, willemite, zincite, sonolite, leucophoenicite, tephroite. Distribution: From Franklin, Sussex Co., New Jersey, USA. Name: In honor of Professor Gerald V. Gibbs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardystonite from the Desert View Mine, California
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Faculty Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Spring 2014 Hardystonite From the Desert View Mine, California James A. Van Fleet Bucknell University, [email protected] Earl R. Verbeek Sterling Hill Mining Museum Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/fac_journ Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Van Fleet, James A. and Verbeek, Earl R.. "Hardystonite From the Desert View Mine, California." The Picking Table: Journal of the Franklin-Ogdensburg Mineralogical Society (2014) : 15-17. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hardystonite From the Desert View Mine, California EARL R. VERBEEK, PhD RESIDENT GEOLOGIST, STERLING HILL MINING MUSEUM 30 PLANT STREET, OGDENSBURG, NJ 07439 [email protected] JAMES VAN FLEET 222 MARKET STREET MIFFLINBURG, PA 17844 [email protected] INTRODUCTION View Mine and further strengthen its mineralogical similarities to Franklin. Although much of the original geology has been In late December of 2012, Kevin Brady, an accomplished obliterated by intrusion of the granodiorite, Leavens and Patton and knowledgeable field collector of minerals, sent to one of (2008) provided mineralogical and geochemical evidence that us (ERV) a specimen of an unknown mineral that he noted the Desert View deposit, like that at Franklin, is exhalative, fluoresced deep violet under shortwave (SW) ultraviolet light and that it is genetically intermediate between the Franklin- and thus resembled hardystonite.
    [Show full text]
  • Zincian and Manganoan Amphiboles from Franklin, New Jersey1
    THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 53, JULY.AUGUST, 1968 ZINCIAN AND MANGANOAN AMPHIBOLES FROM FRANKLIN, NEW JERSEY1 ConNBr.rsKrurN, Jn. aNo JuN Iro,2 DepartmentoJ Geological Sciences, H of mon Laboratory, H araard U nioersi.ty, Cambrid.ge, M assochusetts. Assrnecr Zincian and manganoan amphiboles occur locally as coarse-grained, irregular massesin the skarn zones of the Franklin orebody. These amphiboles are associated mainly with calcite, rhodochrosite, rhodonite, tephroite, andradite, willemite and franklinite. Chemical analyses, optical and X-ray parameters, and assemblage descriptions are given for three cummingtonites, nine members of the tremolite-actinolite series and one magnesioriebec- kite. The cummingtonites show maximum ZnO and MnO contents of 10.8 and 13.79 weight perceDt respectively (1.22 and 1.83 atoms/half unit cell); members of the tremolite- actinolite series contain smaller amounts of ZnO and MnO, the maxima being 9.54 and 5.42 weight percent respectively (1 04 and 0.67 atoms/half unit cell); a magnesioriebeckite con- tains 7.84 weight percent ZnO and,4.16 weight percent MnO (0.86 and 0.81 atoms/half unit ceII). INrnopucrroN In his study of Franklin minerals, Palache (1937) reported the analysis and optical parametersof a zinc-rich cummingtonite (seeTable 1, no. 89365),but no other zinc-rich amphibolesare describedin the literature. Manganoan amphiboles are much more common in nature and have been studied by various authors (Sundius, 1931; Yosimura, 1939; Bilgrami,1955;Jaffe et al., 196l; Segeler,1961; Matkovskiy, 1962;and Klein, 1964and 1966). The amphiboles of this study are of interest becauseof the large and variable amounts of Zn and Mn2+ that are present in their structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Gahnite-Franklinite Intergrowths at the Sterling Hill Zinc Deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey: an Analytical and Experimental Study
    Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Theses and Dissertations 1-1-1978 Gahnite-franklinite intergrowths at the Sterling Hill zinc deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey: An analytical and experimental study. Antone V. Carvalho Follow this and additional works at: http://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Carvalho, Antone V., "Gahnite-franklinite intergrowths at the Sterling Hill zinc deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey: An analytical and experimental study." (1978). Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2136. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GAHNITE-FRANKLINITE INTERGROWTHS AT THE STERLING HILL ZINC DEPOSIT, SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY: AN ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY by Antone V. Carvalho III A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Committee of Lehigh University in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Science in Geological Sciences Lehigh University 1978 ProQuest Number: EP76409 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest EP76409 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 65, the Minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey, 1962
    THEMINERALSOF FRANKLINAND STERLINGHILL NEWJERSEY BULLETIN 65 NEW JERSEYGEOLOGICALSURVEY DEPARTMENTOF CONSERVATIONAND ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 65 THE MINERALS OF FRANKLIN AND STERLING HILL, NEW JERSEY bY ALBERT S. WILKERSON Professor of Geology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey STATE OF NEw JERSEY Department of Conservation and Economic Development H. MAT ADAMS, Commissioner Division of Resource Development KE_rr_ H. CR_V_LINCDirector, Bureau of Geology and Topography KEMBLEWIDX_, State Geologist TRENTON, NEW JERSEY --1962-- NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ......................................... 5 History of Area ................................... 7 General Geology ................................... 9 Origin of the Ore Deposits .......................... 10 The Rowe Collection ................................ 11 List of 42 Mineral Species and Varieties First Found at Franklin or Sterling Hill .......................... 13 Other Mineral Species and Varieties at Franklin or Sterling Hill ............................................ 14 Tabular Summary of Mineral Discoveries ................. 17 The Luminescent Minerals ............................ 22 Corrections to Franklln-Sterling Hill Mineral List of Dis- credited Species, Incorrect Names, Usages, Spelling and Identification .................................... 23 Description of Minerals: Bementite ......................................... 25 Cahnite ..........................................
    [Show full text]