Base Your Answers to Questions 1 and 2 on the Diagram Below, Which Shows the Results of Three Different Physical Tests, A, B, and C, That Were Performed on a Mineral

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Base Your Answers to Questions 1 and 2 on the Diagram Below, Which Shows the Results of Three Different Physical Tests, A, B, and C, That Were Performed on a Mineral Base your answers to questions 1 and 2 on the diagram below, which shows the results of three different physical tests, A, B, and C, that were performed on a mineral. 1. The luster of this mineral could be determined by A) using an electronic balance B) using a graduated cylinder C) observing how light reflects from the surface of the mineral D) observing what happens when acid is placed on the mineral 2. Which mineral was tested? A) amphibole B) quartz C) galena D) graphite 3. Different arrangements of tetrahedra in the silicate group of minerals result in differences in the minerals' A) age, density, and smoothness B) cleavage, color, and abundance C) hardness, cleavage, and crystal shape D) chemical composition, size, and origin 4. The diagram of Bowen's Reaction Series below indicates the relative temperatures at which specific minerals crystallize as magma cools. Which statement is best supported by Bowen's Reaction Series? A) Most minerals crystallize at the same temperature. B) Most felsic minerals usually crystallize before most mafic minerals. C) Muscovite mica and quartz are the last minerals to crystallize as magma cools. D) Biotite mica is the first mineral to crystallize as magma cools. Base your answers to questions 5 through 8 on the 6. Moh's scale arranges minerals according to their data table below. relative A) resistance to breaking B) resistance to scratching C) specific heat D) specific gravity 7. Which statement is best supported by the data shown? A) An iron nail contains fluorite. B) A streak plate is composed of quartz. C) Topaz is harder than a steel file. D) Apatite is softer than a copper penny. 8. The durable gemstones ruby and sapphire are valuable due to their color and hardness. These gemstones would most likely be located on Moh's scale at the hardness level of A) 1 B) 9 C) 3 D) 4 5. Moh's scale would be most useful for 9. Which characteristic do samples of the mineral pyroxene normally exhibit? A) finding the mass of a mineral sample B) finding the density of a mineral sample A) yellow to amber color C) identifying a mineral sample B) bubbling in hydrochloric acid D) counting the number of cleavage surfaces of a C) cleaves at 56° and 124° mineral sample D) hardness of 5 to 6 10. Scratching a mineral against a glass plate and rubbing a mineral on a streak plate are helpful procedures for determining a mineral’s A) density B) identity C) cleavage D) internal atomic structure 11. Which mineral bubbles when acid is placed on it? A) Calcite B) Pyroxene C) Potassium Feldspar D) Garnet 12. Base your answer to the following question on the table below, which shows the characteristics of four different mineral samples. Which two mineral samples would be most difficult to distinguish from each other based on their color, luster, and streak? A) halite and quartz B) halite and gold C) galena and quartz D) galena and gold 13. An unidentified mineral that is softer than calcite exhibits a metallic luster and cubic cleavage. This mineral most likely is A) galena B) pyrite C) halite D) pyroxene 14. What is the best way to determine if a mineral sample is calcite or quartz? A) Observe the color of the mineral. B) Place the mineral near a magnet. C) Place a drop of acid on the mineral. D) Measure the mass of the mineral. 15. The relative hardness of a mineral can best be tested by A) scratching the mineral across a glass plate B) squeezing the mineral with calibrated pliers C) determining the density of the mineral D) breaking the mineral with a hammer 16. The diagram below represents the mass and volume of a mineral sample being measured. These measurements were used to determine the density of the mineral sample. What is the density of this mineral sample? A) 6 g/mL B) 24 g/mL C) 34 g/mL D) 60 g/mL 17. Which property is most useful in mineral identification? A) hardness B) color C) size D) texture 18. Which mineral leaves a green-black powder when rubbed against an unglazed porcelain plate? A) galena B) graphite C) hematite D) pyrite Base your answers to questions 19 and 20 on the diagram below, which shows three minerals with three different physical tests, A, B, and C, being performed on them. 19. The results of all three physical tests shown are most useful for determining the A) rate of weathering of the minerals B) identity of the minerals C) environment where the minerals formed D) geologic period when the minerals formed 20. Which sequence correctly matches each test, A, B, and C, with the mineral property tested? A) A—cleavage; B—streak; C—hardness B) A—cleavage; B—hardness; C—streak C) A—streak; B—cleavage; C—hardness D) A—streak; B—hardness; C—cleavage 21. Base your answer to the following question on the information below. A student on a field trip in New York State collected a sample of metamorphic bedrock containing bands of coarse-grained crystals of plagioclase feldspar, pyroxene, quartz, and mica. Describe two physical properties of pyroxene. 22. A human fingernail has a hardness of approximately 2.5. Which two minerals are softer than a human fingernail? A) calcite and halite B) sulfur and fluorite C) graphite and talc D) pyrite and magnetite 23. Which mineral would most likely become rounded at the fastest rate when tumbled along A) garnet B) pyroxene C) plagioclase feldspar D) selenite gypsum Base your answers to questions 24 and 25 on the diagram and table below. 24. If the volume of mineral sample A is 28 cubic centimeters, sample A is most likely A) copper B) galena C) chalcopyrite D) dolomite 25. The original shape of mineral sample A was altered when it was hit with a rock hammer. Which physical property caused the mineral to break as it did? A) hardness B) luster C) cleavage D) streak 26. Which mineral will scratch fluorite, galena, and pyroxene? A) graphite B) calcite C) olivine D) dolomite 27. Which diagram best shows the grain size of some common sedimentary rocks? A) B) C) D) 28. A nonvesicular rock is made entirely of green 2-millimeter-diameter crystals that have a hardness of 6.5 and show fracture, but notcleavage. The rock is most likely A) shale B) phyllite C) dunite D) schist 29. Scratching a mineral against a glass plate is a method used for determining the mineral's A) color B) hardness C) luster D) cleavage Base your answers to questions 30 and 31 on the data table below and on your knowledge of Earth science. The table provides information about four minerals, A through D. 30. The diagram below represents a sample of mineral A. Mineral A is most likely A) garnet B) galena C) olivine D) halite 31. Which mineral can scratch A, B, and C, but can not scratch D? A) talc B) selenite gypsum C) fluorite D) quartz 32. The diagram below shows four mineral samples, each having approximately the same mass. If all four samples are placed together in a closed, dry container and shaken vigorously for 10 minutes, which mineral sample would experience the most abrasion? A) quartz B) amphibole C) pyroxene D) galena 33. The photograph below shows an outcrop where a light-colored, igneous rock is cross cut by a dark-colored, igneous rock. This fine-grained, dark-colored, igneous rock is most likely A) rhyolite B) diorite C) basalt D) gabbro 34. Which mineral shows no cleavage, has a hardness of 7, and a composition of SiO2? A) Graphite B) Garnet C) Halite D) Quartz 35. Which mineral is white or colorless, has a hardness of 2.5, and splits with cubic cleavage? A) calcite B) halite C) pyrite D) mica 36. Base your answer to the following question on the passage and map below. The map shows the generalized landscape regions of Vermont. Landscape Regions of Vermont Most of Vermont's landscape regions consist of ancient, weathered mountains that were covered by several ice sheets during the last ice age. When the ice melted, sand, cobbles, and boulders were deposited throughout the state, Vermont is divided into six landscape regions. (1) The Vermont Lowlands region has a mild climate, with Lake Champlain moderating its temperature. (2) The Green Mountains run the length of Vermont and were formed over 400 million years ago. Most of the bedrock is metamorphic and the region is known for its deposits of talc and asbestos. (3) The Taconic Mountains extend into New York State. Slate and marble are commonly mined in this region. (4) The Valley of Vermont is a narrow valley between two mountain ranges. Most of the bedrock in the region is limestone and marble. (5) The Vermont Piedmont covers the largest area of the state. This region consists of rolling hills and valleys. Granite mining is an important industry. (6) The Northeast Highlands is a mountainous region composed of granite bedrock. Some of the bedrock in the Green Mountains is actually green in color because of the presence of the mineral chlorite. Which other mineral can cause rocks to appear green? A) sulfur B) magnetite C) olivine D) halite 37. Which mineral has a metallic luster, a black streak, 41. Which mineral scratches dolomite and is scratched and is an ore of iron? by olivine? A) galena B) magnetite A) galena C) pyroxene D) graphite B) quartz 38. Which home-building material is made mostly from C) potassium feldspar the mineral gypsum? D) muscovite mica A) plastic pipes B) window glass 42.
Recommended publications
  • Zincite (Zn, Mn2+)O
    Zincite (Zn, Mn2+)O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 6mm. Crystals rare, typically pyramidal, hemimorphic, with large {0001}, to 2.5 cm, rarely curved; in broad cleavages, foliated, granular, compact, massive. Twinning: On {0001}, with composition plane {0001}. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {1010}, perfect; parting on {0001}, commonly distinct. Fracture: Conchoidal. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 4 VHN = 205–221 (100 g load). D(meas.) = 5.66(2) D(calc.) = 5.6730 Rare pale yellow fluorescence under LW UV. Optical Properties: Translucent, transparent in thin fragments. Color: Yellow-orange to deep red, rarely yellow, green, colorless; deep red to yellow in transmitted light; light rose-brown in reflected light, with strong red to yellow internal reflections. Streak: Yellow-orange. Luster: Subadamantine to resinous. Optical Class: Uniaxial (+). ω = 2.013 = 2.029 R1–R2: (400) 13.0–13.6, (420) 12.8–13.2, (440) 12.6–12.8, (460) 12.3–12.6, (480) 12.1–12.4, (500) 12.0–12.2, (520) 11.8–12.1, (540) 11.8–12.0, (560) 11.7–11.9, (580) 11.6–11.8, (600) 11.4–11.7, (620) 11.3–11.6, (640) 11.2–11.5, (660) 11.1–11.4, (680) 11.0–11.2, (700) 11.0–11.2 Cell Data: Space Group: P 63mc (synthetic). a = 3.24992(5) c = 5.20658(8) Z = 2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Synthetic. 2.476 (100), 2.816 (71), 2.602 (56), 1.626 (40), 1.477 (35), 1.911 (29), 1.379 (28) Chemistry: (1) (2) SiO2 0.08 FeO 0.01 0.23 MnO 0.27 0.29 ZnO 99.63 98.88 Total 99.99 [99.40] (1) Sterling Hill, New Jersey, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Scanned
    American Mineralogist, Volume 70, pages 379-387, 1985 Ma_nganesehumites and leucophoenicitesfrom Franklin and Sterling- Hill' NewJersev: 'i"? andimplications ;ifi':il1,;;lfiil11"r's' Perr J. Dullx Department of Mineral Sciences Smithsonian lnstitution, Washington, D. C. 20560 Abstract The manganesehumites, (alleghanyite, manganhumite, and sonolite),together with some Mn-bearing samplesof the Mg-humites,and the related phasesleucophoenicite and jerry- gibbsite,from the orebodiesat Franklin and SterlingHill, New Jersey,are describedtogether with analytical data. Solid solution betweenhumite and manganhumiteis at least partially continuous. Expected Mn/Mg solid solutions between alleghanyiteand chondrodite, and betweensonolite and clinohumite, are discontinuous; they are interrupted by apparently orderedphases. In all cases,the possibleorderings involve Zn as well as Mn and Mg. There are no Mn end-membersof the manganesehumites at this locality. Manganeseis apparently restricted in leucophoenicite(5.42-6.63 Mn per 7 octahedral cations) and in jerrygibbsite (7.79-8.02Mn per 9 octahedralcations). Calcium is common to both leucophoeniciteand jerrygibbsite,but among the Mn-humites,only sonoliteaccepts appreciable Ca (0.65Ca per 9 octahedralcations). There is a "threshold" level ofzinc in all studiedsamples; this "threshold" levelis a constantfor leucophoenicite1-9.3 Znper 3 Si)and alleghanyite(-O.2Zn per 2 Si). No samplesof leucophoeniciteor jerrygibbsite were found to be Zn-ftee,suggesting either that Zn is required for their stability, or that these two phasesmight not be stable as end-members.Fluorine is present in all the Mn-humites and is proportional to the Mg- content,but is absentin leucophoeniciteand jerrygibbsite. Introduction humite speciesoccur there; the Mg-humites occur in the The magnesiumhumite species(norbergite, chondrodite, host Franklin Marble for the most part, and the Mn- humite, and clinohumite) have been well-studiedand re- humites in the orebodiesthemselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Leucophoenicite Mn (Sio4)3(OH)2
    2+ Leucophoenicite Mn7 (SiO4)3(OH)2 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2=m: Crystals rare, typically slender, prismatic, elongated and striated [010], to 8 mm; in isolated grains or granular massive. Twinning: On k 001 , common, contact or interpenetrant twins, lamellar. f g Physical Properties: Cleavage: 001 , imperfect. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 5.5{6 f g D(meas.) = 3.848 D(calc.) = [4.01] Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Brown to light purple-red, raspberry-red, deep pink to light pink; rose-red to colorless in thin section. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial ({). Pleochroism: Faint; rose-red 001 ; colorless 001 . Orientation: k f g ? f g X 001 cleavage. Dispersion: r > v; slight. ® = 1.751(3) ¯ = 1.771(3) ° = 1.782(3) ? f g 2V(meas.) = 74(5)± Cell Data: Space Group: P 21=a: a = 10.842(19) b = 4.826(6) c = 11.324(9) ¯ = 103:93(9)± Z = [2] X-ray Powder Pattern: Franklin, New Jersey, USA. 1.8063 (10), 2.877 (9), 2.684 (8), 4.36 (5), 3.612 (5), 2.365 (5), 2.620 (4) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) SiO2 26.36 26.7 26.7 CaO 5.67 2.4 2.8 FeO trace 0.3 0.3 Na2O 0.39 MnO 60.63 62.8 64.7 K2O 0.24 ZnO 3.87 0.0 0.0 H2O 2.64 [2.3] [2.8] MgO 0.21 5.5 2.7 Total 100.01 [100.0] [100.0] (1) Franklin, New Jersey, USA; composite of two analyses, corresponding to (Mn5:89Ca0:70Zn0:32 Na0:04Mg0:03K0:01)§=6:99(Si1:01O4)3(OH)2: (2) Kombat mine, Namibia; by electron microprobe, H2O by di®erence; corresponding to (Mn5:98Mg0:92Ca0:29Fe0:02)§=7:21(SiO4)3(OH)1:72: (3) Valsesia-Valtournanche area, Italy; by electron microprobe, H2O by di®erence; corresponding to (Mn6:16Mg0:45Ca0:34Fe0:03)§=6:98(SiO4)3(OH)2:10: Mineral Group: Leucophoenicite group.
    [Show full text]
  • TEPHROITE from FRANKLIN, NEW JERSEY* Connbrrus S. Hunrsur
    THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL 46, MAY_JUNE, 1961 TEPHROITE FROM FRANKLIN, NEW JERSEY* ConNBrrus S. Hunrsur, Jn., Departmentof Mineralogy, Harvard, Uniaersity. Assrnlcr A study of tephroite specimens from Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey showed in all of them the presence of thin sheets of willemite believed to be a product of exsolution. .fhese sheets are oriented parallel to the {100} and [010] planes of tephroite with the o and r axes of tephroite and willemite parallel. It is believed that Iittle zinc remains in the tephroite structure and that much of it reported in chemical analyses has been con- tributed by intergrown u'illemite. This conclusion is supported by experiments syn- thesizing tephroite. The indices of refraction and d spacing of {130} vary as would be expected with changes in amounts of MgO, FeO and CaO. INrnooucrroN 'fephroite, Mn2SiO4,a member of the olivine group, was describedas a new mineral from SterlingHill by Breithaupt in 1823.A chemicalanal- ysis of the original material was published by Brush (1864) together with severaladditional chemical analysesof tephroite made by others. These analysesreport ZnO in varying amounts which Brush attributed to invariably associatedzincite. Palache (1937) did not agree with Brush and stated " . that the molecularratios in someanalyses more nearly satisfy the orthosilicateformula when zinc is regardedas essen- tially a part of the mineral rather than as a constituent of mechanical inclusions." The present study was undertaken for the purpose of in- vestigatingthe variations in the propertiesof tephroite with changesin chemical composition, particularly the effect of zinc. Relationships were not expectedto be simplefor analysesshow, in addition to ZnO, variable amounts of MgO, FeO, and CaO.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Primitive Radio Detector Minerals H.P
    Sheet1 Useful Primitive Radio Detector Minerals H.P. Friedichs, AC7ZL Chemical Chemical Crystal PW Eccles Toricata Morgan Mineral Composition Formula Category Suitable Contacts (1925) (1928) (1910) (1913) Allemontite Arsenic antimonide AsSb Antimonide x Anatase Titanium dioxide TiO2 Oxide Metals and Zincite x x Antimony Element Sb Element Zincite, silicon, etc. x Argentite (silver glance) Silver sulfide Ag2S Sulfide Metals, graphite, tellurium x Arkansite See Anatase x Arsenic Element As Element Metals and Zincite x x x Arsenic pyrites See Mispickel x Bornite (peacock Sulfide of copper and ore) iron Cu5FeS4 Sulfide Zincite, silicon, etc. x x x x Boron Element B Element Zincite, tellurium x x Sulfide of antimony Boulangerite and lead Pb5Sb4S11 Sulfosalt x Sulfide of copper, Zincite, tellurium, Bourmonite antimony and lead PbCuSbS3 Sulfosalt antimony, bismuth x Brookite See Anatase x x Carborundum Silicon Carbide SiC Steel, zincite x Zincite (this combination is Sulfide of iron and the famous Perikon Chalcopyrite copper CuFeS2 Sulfide detector) x x x Cobaltite Cobalt arsenic sulfide CoAsS Zincite x x Cassiterite Tin Oxide SnO2 Oxide Metals x x Cerussite Lead Carbonate PbCo3 Carbonate ?x Chalcocite (copper glance) Copper sulfide Cu2S Sulfide Zincite, tellurium x x x Zincite (this combination is Sulfide of iron and the famous Perikon Copper pyrites copper CuFeS2 Sulfide detector) x x Corundum Aluminum oxidde Al2O3 Oxide Zincite, bornite x Page 1 Sheet1 Covellite Copper sulfide CuS Sulfide Zincite, etc x x Cuprite (Cuprous oxide) Copper oxide
    [Show full text]
  • Jerrygibbsite Mn (Sio4)
    2+ Jerrygibbsite Mn9 (SiO4)4(OH)2 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: mm2 (probable), or 2=m 2=m 2=m: As interlocking anhedral crystals, to 2 mm. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Imperfect on 001 . Hardness = 5.5 D(meas.) = 4.00(2) D(calc.) = 4.045 f g » Optical Properties: Transparent and translucent lamellae alternating 001 . Color: Violet-pink, with a brownish tinge; light pink in thin section. Strekakf: Light pink. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial ({). Orientation: X = b; Y = c; Z = a. Dispersion: r > v; moderate. ® = 1.772(4) ¯ = 1.783(4) ° = 1.789(4) 2V(meas.) = 72± Cell Data: Space Group: P bn21 (probable), or P bnm: a = 4.875(2) b = 10.709(6) c = 28.18(2) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Franklin, New Jersey, USA. 2.557 (100), 1.806 (100), 2.869 (78), 2.752 (49), 2.702 (46), 2.362 (39), 2.661 (34) Chemistry: (1) SiO2 27.1 FeO 0.3 MnO 64.1 ZnO 3.9 MgO 1.4 CaO 0.4 F 0.0 H2O 2.13 Total 99.3 (1) Franklin, New Jersey, USA; by electron microprobe, H2O by the Pen¯eld method; corresponds to (Mn7:86Zn0:59Mg0:24Ca0:16Fe0:14)§=8:99(SiO4)4(OH)2: Polymorphism & Series: Dimorphous with sonolite. Mineral Group: Leucophoenicite group. Occurrence: In a metamorphosed stratiform Zn-Mn deposit. Association: Franklinite, willemite, zincite, sonolite, leucophoenicite, tephroite. Distribution: From Franklin, Sussex Co., New Jersey, USA. Name: In honor of Professor Gerald V. Gibbs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of 1850S Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S
    Identification of 1850s Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S. Capitol Author(s): Frank S. Welsh Source: APT Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 1 (2008), pp. 17-30 Published by: Association for Preservation Technology International (APT) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25433934 Accessed: 25/12/2009 10:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aptech. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Association for Preservation Technology International (APT) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to APT Bulletin. http://www.jstor.org Identification of 1850s Brown Zinc Paint Made with Franklinite and Zincite at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gahnite-Franklinite Intergrowths at the Sterling Hill Zinc Deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey: an Analytical and Experimental Study
    Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Theses and Dissertations 1-1-1978 Gahnite-franklinite intergrowths at the Sterling Hill zinc deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey: An analytical and experimental study. Antone V. Carvalho Follow this and additional works at: http://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Carvalho, Antone V., "Gahnite-franklinite intergrowths at the Sterling Hill zinc deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey: An analytical and experimental study." (1978). Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2136. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GAHNITE-FRANKLINITE INTERGROWTHS AT THE STERLING HILL ZINC DEPOSIT, SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY: AN ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY by Antone V. Carvalho III A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Committee of Lehigh University in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Science in Geological Sciences Lehigh University 1978 ProQuest Number: EP76409 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest EP76409 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 65, the Minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey, 1962
    THEMINERALSOF FRANKLINAND STERLINGHILL NEWJERSEY BULLETIN 65 NEW JERSEYGEOLOGICALSURVEY DEPARTMENTOF CONSERVATIONAND ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 65 THE MINERALS OF FRANKLIN AND STERLING HILL, NEW JERSEY bY ALBERT S. WILKERSON Professor of Geology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey STATE OF NEw JERSEY Department of Conservation and Economic Development H. MAT ADAMS, Commissioner Division of Resource Development KE_rr_ H. CR_V_LINCDirector, Bureau of Geology and Topography KEMBLEWIDX_, State Geologist TRENTON, NEW JERSEY --1962-- NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ......................................... 5 History of Area ................................... 7 General Geology ................................... 9 Origin of the Ore Deposits .......................... 10 The Rowe Collection ................................ 11 List of 42 Mineral Species and Varieties First Found at Franklin or Sterling Hill .......................... 13 Other Mineral Species and Varieties at Franklin or Sterling Hill ............................................ 14 Tabular Summary of Mineral Discoveries ................. 17 The Luminescent Minerals ............................ 22 Corrections to Franklln-Sterling Hill Mineral List of Dis- credited Species, Incorrect Names, Usages, Spelling and Identification .................................... 23 Description of Minerals: Bementite ......................................... 25 Cahnite ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Behavior of Zn-Bearing Phases in Base Metal Slag from France and Poland: a Mineralogical Approach for Environmental Purposes
    Journal of Geochemical Exploration 136 (2014) 1–13 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Geochemical Exploration journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jgeoexp Behavior of Zn-bearing phases in base metal slag from France and Poland: A mineralogical approach for environmental purposes Maxime Vanaecker a, Alexandra Courtin-Nomade a,⁎,HubertBrila, Jacky Laureyns b,Jean-FrançoisLenaina a Université de Limoges, GRESE, E.A. 4330, IFR 145 GEIST, F.S.T., 123 Avenue A. Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France b Université de Lille 1, USTL, LASIR, C5, BP 69, 59652 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France article info abstract Article history: Slag samples from three pyrometallurgical sites (two in France, one in Poland) were studied for their Zn-phase con- Received 18 February 2013 tent, evolution and potential release of metals over time. Mineral assemblages were observed and analyzed using Accepted 3 September 2013 various complementary tools and approaches: chemical extractions, optical microscopy, cathodoluminescence, Available online 12 September 2013 X-ray diffraction, Scanning Electron Microscopy, ElectronProbeMicro-Analysis,andmicro-Raman spectrometry. The primary assemblages are composed of analogs to willemite, hardystonite, zincite, wurtzite, petedunnite and Keywords: franklinite. Some of these phases are sensitive to alteration (e.g., deuteric processes during cooling and by Slag fi Weathering weathering) and, as a result, goslarite, smithsonite and hemimorphite have been identi ed as secondary products. Zn-phase stability In comparing these results to the geochemical conditions at each site in relation to mineralogical investigations, Melilites different steps of Zn-rich mineral destabilization could be identified. This procedure allows assessing potential Raman spectroscopy environmental impacts due to a release of metals that may contain slag.
    [Show full text]
  • Gageite (Mn ; Mg; Zn)42Si16o54(OH)40 C 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic, Pseudotetragonal, Or Triclinic
    2+ Gageite (Mn ; Mg; Zn)42Si16O54(OH)40 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic, pseudotetragonal, or triclinic. Point Group: 2=m or 1: Minute laths or saddlelike crystals grouped radially, in bundles, or as matted ¯bers. Physical Properties: Cleavage: 110 , pronounced. Hardness = 3 D(meas.) = 3.46{3.584 D(calc.) = 3.599 f g Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Colorless, pale pink, pale brown. Luster: Highly vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial ({). Orientation: Z ¯ber length. Dispersion: r < v; extreme. ® = 1.723(3) ¯ = 1.734(3) ° = 1.736(3) k2V(meas.) = n.d. Cell Data: Space Group: P 2=n: a = 19.42 b = 19.42 c = 9.84 ¯ = 89:5± Z = [1], or Space Group: P 1: a = 14.17 b = 14.07 c = 9.84 ® = 76:5± ¯ = 76:6± ° = 86:9± Z = [1] X-ray Powder Pattern: Franklin, New Jersey, USA. 6.87 (100), 2.758 (80), 2.707 (80), 3.44 (60), 3.25 (60), 2.556 (60), 1.6742 (60) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) SiO2 24.71 23.58 23.90 Al2O3 0.15 FeO 0.03 0.20 MnO 50.19 53.74 51.06 ZnO 8.76 3.96 4.30 MgO 11.91 9.95 11.34 CaO 0.19 H2O [4.43] 8.24 [9.01] Total [100.00] 99.65 [100.00] (1) Franklin, New Jersey, USA; H2O by di®erence. (2) Do. (3) Do.; by electron microprobe, average of seven analyses, H2O by di®erence; corresponds to (Mn28:95Mg11:32Zn2:13 Ca0:14Fe0:11)§=42:65Si16O54:53(OH)40:23: Polymorphism & Series: 2M, 1A polytypes.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Lead and Zinc
    Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Mining Industry 6 Lead and Zinc Lead and zinc ores are usually found together with gold and silver. A lead-zinc ore may also contain lead sulfide, zinc sulfide, iron sulfide, iron carbonate, and quartz. When zinc and lead sulfides are present in profitable amounts they are regarded as ore minerals. The remaining rock and minerals are called gangue. Forms of Lead and Zinc Ore The two principal minerals containing lead and zinc are galena and sphalerite. These two minerals are frequently found together along with other sulfide minerals, but one or the other may be predominant. Galena may contain small amounts of impurities including the precious metal silver, usually in the form of a sulfide. When silver is present in sufficient quantities, galena is regarded as a silver ore and called argentiferous galena. Sphalerite is zinc sulfide, but may contain iron. Black sphalerite may contain as much as 18 percent iron. Lead Ore The lead produced from lead ore is a soft, flexible and ductile metal. It is bluish-white, very dense, and has a low melting point. Lead is found in veins and masses in limestone and dolomite. It is also found with deposits of other metals, such as zinc, silver, copper, and gold. Lead is essentially a co-product of zinc mining or a byproduct of copper and/or gold and silver mining. Complex ores are also the source of byproduct metals such as bismuth, antimony, silver, copper, and gold. The most common lead-ore mineral is galena, or lead sulfide (PbS).
    [Show full text]