Research Paper GEOSPHERE Revealing the hidden Milankovitch record from Pennsylvanian cyclothem successions and implications regarding late Paleozoic GEOSPHERE; v. 11, no. 4 chronology and terrestrial-carbon (coal) storage doi:10.1130/GES01177.1 Frank J.G. van den Belt1, Thomas B. van Hoof2, and Henk J.M. Pagnier3 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80021, 3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands 9 figures 2TNO Geo-Energy Division, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands 3TNO/Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands CORRESPONDENCE:
[email protected] CITATION: van den Belt, F.J.G., van Hoof, T.B., ABSTRACT An analysis of cumulative coal-bed thickness further indicates that terres- and Pagnier, H.J.M., 2015, Revealing the hidden Milankovitch record from Pennsylvanian cyclothem trial-carbon (coal) storage patterns are comparable in the two remote areas: successions and implications regarding late Paleo- The widely held view that Pennsylvanian cyclothems formed in response in the Netherlands ~5 m coal per m.y. during the Langsettian (Westphalian zoic chronology and terrestrial-carbon (coal) stor- to Milankovitch-controlled, glacio-eustatic, sea-level oscillations lacks unam- A) and increasing abruptly to ~20 m/m.y. at the start of the Duckmantian age: Geosphere, v. 11, no. 4, p. 1062–1076, doi:10 .1130 /GES01177.1. biguous quantitative support and is challenged by models that are based on substage (Westphalian B). In Kentucky, storage rates were lower, but when climate-controlled precipitation-driven changes in depositional style. This standardized to Dutch subsidence, the pattern is identical.