DOCSLIB.ORG

The Bronze Statuette of a Mouse from Kedesh and Its Significance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BABesch 76 (2001) The Bronze Statuette of a Mouse from Kedesh and its Significance Sonia Mucznik and Asher Ovadiah A statuette of a mouse in moulded bronze1 was A similar event occurred in the Old Testament in found in the temple at Kedesh,2 Upper Galilee, in connection with the Ark of the God of Israel: ... five the course of the first season of the archaeological golden emerods, and five golden mice, according to excavations.3 the number of the lords of the Phillistines: for one The mouse appears with its forepaws stretched for- plague was on you all, and on your lords... and wards, its weight on the hind paws; its raised head, images of your mice that mar the land...8 This coin- wide-open eyes, pricked ears, and slightly open mouth cidence between the Biblical and the Greek worlds suggest that all its senses are alert and that it is ready is noteworthy and quite amazing, closing a cultural for action. Its long tail is rolled up over its right hind cycle. The Philistines, who belonged to one of the thigh. The fur on its body and head is represented by Sea Peoples, had reached the eastern Mediterranean, regular small incised marks, but the tail is smooth and either from the Aegean islands or from Crete. Upon rounded; the underside of the paws are flat (Figs. 1-5). their arrival in the region they brought with them Although it was not found in situ, the statuette was cultural elements of the pre-Hellenic tradition, prob- discovered within the temple area, and thus belongs to ably including the mice of Apollo Smintheus. It the same period of the temple (2nd-4th centuries CE). should be pointed out that the offering they bestowed, The ‘mouse-god’ (Smintheus - Σµινθες) is a title according to the Bible, to the God of Israel: five that was given to Apollo,4 as the god who had saved golden emerods and five golden mice, suggests their a local community from a plague of field mice.5 On cultural connections with the pre-Hellenic world in the other hand, it was by his own curse that the god general, and the region of Troas in particular. The had sent the mice into the fields to destroy the crops interesting point is the similar functions of the mice (ν ρσ η, πλει τς Μυσας, Κρνς τις ερες mentioned in the Bible and those of Apollo Smintheus ν τ κεθι Απλλωνς. ττ#ω $ργισθε&ς ' referred to in the Greek literary sources. θε)ς *πεµψεν α-τ τς /γρς µας, 0τινες Literary sources, archaeological evidence and numis- τς καρπς λυµανντ).6 In the place where matic data associate the mouse or rat with Apollo, the event had occurred, the priest built a temple dedi- as his attribute, and testify to the cult of Apollo cated to the god Smintheus as, according to the local Smintheus having been practised in Troas, in Asia dialect, mice are called sminthi (1 γενµ2νυ ' Minor. It seems that the mouse was a mantic sym- Κρνις ερ)ν δρσατ τ#4 θε#4, Σµινθ2α α-τ)ν bol and connected with the founding of the Trojan πρσαγρεσας, πειδ5 κατ6 τ5ν γ78ριν state of Chryse (later known as Hamaxitos),9 where α-τ4ν δι9λεκτν µες σµνθι καλνται).7 the Temple of Apollo Smintheus was erected, and 1 The measurements are: L - 6.9 cm; H - 3 cm; w - 2.4 cm; weight - 120 grs. 2 The statuette was found on the 6th of August 1981 in area A, square I-14. 3 See Ovadiah et al. 1984, 146-172; Ovadiah et al. 1985, 353-360; Ovadiah et al. 1987, 168-173; Ovadiah et al. 1993, 60-63; Ovadiah et al. 1993a, 209-230. 4 Sminthos (Σµνθς) means mouse; see Scholia Graeca, 1969, A39 (p. 20):Σµινθε: πθετν ’Απλλωνς; Σµνθς γ6ρ…; LIMC II.1, 231. 5 See Roscher IV, 1965, s.v. ‘Smintheus’, cols. 1083-1087; s.v. ‘Skamandros’, col. 984; Roscher I.1, 1965, s.v. ‘Apollon’, cols. 462- 463. For Smintheus, see also Cook II.1, 1925, 250 (n.2), 255; DAGR I.1, 1962, 317. For festivals named ‘Sminthia’ (Σµνθια), celebrated in honour of the god Smintheus, see DAGR IV. 2, 1963, 1365. 6 Hill 1916, 136; Farnell IV, 1971, 448. 7 Hill 1916, 136-137; Farnell IV, 1971, 448. 8 I Sam. 6: 4-5. Our thanks are due to Mr. Matti Fischer, who drew our attention to this matter. 9 LIMC II.1, 231-232. Fig. 1. 133 Fig. 2. Fig. 3. Fig. 4. Fig. 5. Figs. 1-5. The bronze mouse from Kedesh (photos: authors). 134 Fig. 6. The bronze mouse in the Munich Prähistorische Staatssammlung (after 200 Jahre Philipp von Zabern). its remains were found and are still visible.10 E στρα, Fτι ν τ> ρσ>η Σµινθ2ως στ&ν ερ)ν Apparently, the mouse was a sacred animal in the κα& µς Aπκειται τ#4 πδ& τ B9νυ, Σκπα Smintheion, associated with Apollo, and part of the *ργν τ Παρυ, ...16 cult of Apollo Smintheus.11 A mouse or rat placed at the foot of the cult statue, In the Iliad I.37 and 39, the city of Chryse12 and the as the attribute of Apollo Smintheus, figures on one god Smintheus,13 identified with Apollo, to whom a of the coins of Alexandria Troas.17 Some scholars temple was erected, are mentioned: Σµινθε, ε< πτ2 consider that Scopas made both the cult image τι 7αρεντ’ π& νη)ν *ρεψα,...(Smintheus, if ever (Apollo’s statue) as well as the mouse, and that this it pleased your heart that I built your temple, ...).14 statuary group was reproduced on coins of Chryse. The statue of Apollo Smintheus by Scopas of Paros Others argue that only the mouse was by Scopas and was, according to Strabo, to be found in the temple that it was added to an older image.18 at Chryse, in Troas, and the mouse was placed at the A similar bronze statuette of a mouse, now in the foot of the statue: ν δ= τ> ρσ>η τατ>η κα& τ) Munich Prähistorische Staatssammlung, dated to the τ Σµινθ2ως ’Απλλωνς στιν ερ)ν κα& τ) σµ?λν τ) τ5ν τυµτητα τ $νµατς 10 The temple of Apollo Smintheus at Chryse (Hamaxitos) in σ4@ν, ' µς, Aπκειται τ#4 πδ& τ B9νυ. Troas has been dated to the end of the third century or 200 BCE; Σκπα δ’ στ&ν *ργα τ Παρυ; συνικεισι see Weber 1966,100-114; Akurgal 1978, 29. δ= κα& τ5ν στραν ε<τε µθν ττ#ω τ#4 τπ#ω 11 Farnell IV, 1971, 448-449. τ5ν περ& τ4ν µυ4ν 12 On the city of Chryse, see Scholia Graeca, 1969, A37d (pp. (In this Chrysa is also the tem- 19-20); Eustathius, 54-56, 60; see also Farnell IV, 1971, 448. ple of Sminthian Apollo, and the symbol which pre- 13 See above, n. 4. serves the etymology of the name (Sminthian means 14 Iliad I. 37,39, trans. R. Lattimore, 1951, Chicago and London. ‘Mouse-god’) I mean the mouse, lies beneath the 15 Strabo, 13.1.48 (VI, pp.92-95) (cf. also Strabo, 13.1.63 (VI, pp. 22-125), 13.1.64 (VI, pp.126-127); Pollitt 1990, 97. Some foot of the cult image (xoanon). These are the works scholars tend to identify on stylistic grounds the statue by Scopas of Scopas of Paros; and also the history, or myth, on the coins of Alexandria Troas (Wroth 1964, xvii, Pls.IV.8, about the mice is associated with this place).15 V.15, VI.2,5), while others reject this identification because of Eustathius, Bishop of Thessalonike, in the 12th cen- the absence of the mouse, and the inclusion of the raven (Richter 1970, Fig. 695). tury CE, mentions a temple of Smintheus at Chryse, 16 Eustathius, 56. and a mouse lying at the foot of the cult image 17 Grace 1932, Fig. 4 on 229; LIMC II.2: 378b. (xoanon), the work of Scopas from Paros: Dησ& γ6ρ 18 Richter 1970, 211. 135 Fig. 7. second half of the first century CE, was found in the basis with Baalshamin, the great deity of the Syro- Roman fortress of Oberstimm (Landkreis Pfaffenhofen) Phoenician region, and the supreme divinity of the (Fig. 6).19 The only difference is that the one in Temple at Kedesh. If, in any case, the statuette of Munich is holding a fruit between its front paws.20 the mouse indicates the worship of Apollo Smintheus The form of this mouse may evoke a connection with at Kedesh, this would be an exceptional phenomenon, Apollo Smintheus in Germany during the Roman beyond the limits of Troas in Asia Minor, making it period, appearing beyond the limits of Troas, the only existing example in the Syro-Phoenician although it may also merely have served as the handle region. of a decorative dish, pot or other vessel. There are in fact several other examples in the Greek Three reliefs carved on a coffer and two modillions world in which in the temple of the main divinity of one of the cornices of the portico entablature of the temple at Kedesh include a basin on a tripod, a cithara, and a crescent with a star. These sculptural 19 Its length is 5.2 cm; it was published in a calendar of ‘200 elements are almost impossible to see and identify, Jahre Philipp von Zabern’, Mainz-am-Rhein, 1985. 20 Similar statuettes of bronze mice are displayed in the Archae- due to their location, high above eye level (about ological Museum at Çanakkale, Turkey, which were inspected 8m), and the small size of the reliefs (approximately by us in the course of two visits (June 1990 and July 2001), but 10x15 cm).
Recommended publications
  • Greek Art in Motion Studies in Honour of Sir John Boardman ​On the Occasion of His 90Th Birthday

    Greek Art in Motion Studies in Honour of Sir John Boardman ​On the Occasion of His 90Th Birthday

    Greek Art in Motion Studies in honour of Sir John Boardman on the occasion of his 90th birthday edited by Rui Morais, Delfim Leão, Diana Rodríguez Pérez with Daniela Ferreira Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2019. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78969 023 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 024 8 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2019 Cover: Head of Alexander in profile. Tourmaline intaglio, 25 x 25 mm, Ashmolean (1892.1499) G.J. Chester Bequest. Photo: C. Wagner. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2019. Contents Preface ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 John Boardman and Greek Sculpture �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 Olga Palagia Sanctuaries and the Hellenistic Polis: An Architectural Approach �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 Milena Melfi ‘Even the fragments, however, merit scrutiny’: Ancient
  • Athenians and Eleusinians in the West Pediment of the Parthenon

    Athenians and Eleusinians in the West Pediment of the Parthenon

    ATHENIANS AND ELEUSINIANS IN THE WEST PEDIMENT OF THE PARTHENON (PLATE 95) T HE IDENTIFICATION of the figuresin the west pedimentof the Parthenonhas long been problematic.I The evidencereadily enables us to reconstructthe composition of the pedimentand to identify its central figures.The subsidiaryfigures, however, are rath- er more difficult to interpret. I propose that those on the left side of the pediment may be identifiedas membersof the Athenian royal family, associatedwith the goddessAthena, and those on the right as membersof the Eleusinian royal family, associatedwith the god Posei- don. This alignment reflects the strife of the two gods on a heroic level, by referringto the legendary war between Athens and Eleusis. The recognition of the disjunctionbetween Athenians and Eleusinians and of parallelism and contrastbetween individualsand groups of figures on the pedimentpermits the identificationof each figure. The referenceto Eleusis in the pediment,moreover, indicates the importanceof that city and its majorcult, the Eleu- sinian Mysteries, to the Athenians. The referencereflects the developmentand exploitation of Athenian control of the Mysteries during the Archaic and Classical periods. This new proposalfor the identificationof the subsidiaryfigures of the west pedimentthus has critical I This article has its origins in a paper I wrote in a graduateseminar directedby ProfessorJohn Pollini at The Johns Hopkins University in 1979. I returned to this paper to revise and expand its ideas during 1986/1987, when I held the Jacob Hirsch Fellowship at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. In the summer of 1988, I was given a grant by the Committeeon Research of Tulane University to conduct furtherresearch for the article.
  • The Medici Aphrodite Angel D

    The Medici Aphrodite Angel D

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2005 A Hellenistic masterpiece: the Medici Aphrodite Angel D. Arvello Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Arvello, Angel D., "A Hellenistic masterpiece: the Medici Aphrodite" (2005). LSU Master's Theses. 2015. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2015 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A HELLENISTIC MASTERPIECE: THE MEDICI APRHODITE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The School of Art by Angel D. Arvello B. A., Southeastern Louisiana University, 1996 May 2005 In Memory of Marcel “Butch” Romagosa, Jr. (10 December 1948 - 31 August 1998) ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to acknowledge the support of my parents, Paul and Daisy Arvello, the love and support of my husband, Kevin Hunter, and the guidance and inspiration of Professor Patricia Lawrence in addition to access to numerous photographs of hers and her coin collection. I would also like to thank Doug Smith both for his extensive website which was invaluable in writing chapter four and for his permission to reproduce the coin in his private collection.
  • SEAT of the WORLD of Beautiful and Gentle Tales Are Discovered and Followed Through Their Development

    SEAT of the WORLD of Beautiful and Gentle Tales Are Discovered and Followed Through Their Development

    The book is focused on the late production of the 4th c. BC Athenian sculptor Praxiteles and in particular 190 on his oeuvre from around 355 to around 340 BC. HE RT OF RAXITELES The most important works of this master considered in this essay are his sculptures for the Mausoleum of T A P IV Halicarnassus, the Apollo Sauroctonus, the Eros of Parium, the Artemis Brauronia, Peitho and Paregoros, his Aphrodite from Corinth, the group of Apollo and Poseidon, the Apollinean triad of Mantinea, the The Late Phase of his Activity Dionysus of Elis, the Hermes of Olympia and the Aphrodite Pseliumene. Complete lists of ancient copies and variations derived from the masterpieces studied here are also provided. The creation by the artist of an art of pleasure and his visual definition of a remote and mythical Arcadia SEAT OF THE WORLD of beautiful and gentle tales are discovered and followed through their development. ANTONIO CORSO Antonio Corso attended his curriculum of studies in classics and archaeology in Padua, Athens, Frank- The Palatine of Ancient Rome furt and London. He published more than 100 scientific essays (articles and books) in well refereed peri- ate Phase of his Activity Phase ate odicals and series of books. The most important areas covered by his studies are the ancient art criticism L and the knowledge of classical Greek artists. In particular he collected in three books all the written tes- The The timonia on Praxiteles and in other three books he reconstructed the career of this sculptor from around 375 to around 355 BC.
  • Parthenon 1 Parthenon

    Parthenon 1 Parthenon

    Parthenon 1 Parthenon Parthenon Παρθενών (Greek) The Parthenon Location within Greece Athens central General information Type Greek Temple Architectural style Classical Location Athens, Greece Coordinates 37°58′12.9″N 23°43′20.89″E Current tenants Museum [1] [2] Construction started 447 BC [1] [2] Completed 432 BC Height 13.72 m (45.0 ft) Technical details Size 69.5 by 30.9 m (228 by 101 ft) Other dimensions Cella: 29.8 by 19.2 m (98 by 63 ft) Design and construction Owner Greek government Architect Iktinos, Kallikrates Other designers Phidias (sculptor) The Parthenon (Ancient Greek: Παρθενών) is a temple on the Athenian Acropolis, Greece, dedicated to the Greek goddess Athena, whom the people of Athens considered their patron. Its construction began in 447 BC and was completed in 438 BC, although decorations of the Parthenon continued until 432 BC. It is the most important surviving building of Classical Greece, generally considered to be the culmination of the development of the Doric order. Its decorative sculptures are considered some of the high points of Greek art. The Parthenon is regarded as an Parthenon 2 enduring symbol of Ancient Greece and of Athenian democracy and one of the world's greatest cultural monuments. The Greek Ministry of Culture is currently carrying out a program of selective restoration and reconstruction to ensure the stability of the partially ruined structure.[3] The Parthenon itself replaced an older temple of Athena, which historians call the Pre-Parthenon or Older Parthenon, that was destroyed in the Persian invasion of 480 BC. Like most Greek temples, the Parthenon was used as a treasury.
  • Greek Sculpture and the Four Elements Art

    Greek Sculpture and the Four Elements Art

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Greek Sculpture and the Four Elements Art 7-1-2000 Greek Sculpture and the Four Elements [full text, not including figures] J.L. Benson University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/art_jbgs Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Benson, J.L., "Greek Sculpture and the Four Elements [full text, not including figures]" (2000). Greek Sculpture and the Four Elements. 1. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/art_jbgs/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Greek Sculpture and the Four Elements by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cover design by Jeff Belizaire About this book This is one part of the first comprehensive study of the development of Greek sculpture and painting with the aim of enriching the usual stylistic-sociological approaches through a serious, disciplined consideration of the basic Greek scientific orientation to the world. This world view, known as the Four Elements Theory, came to specific formulation at the same time as the perfected contrapposto of Polykleitos and a concern with the four root colors in painting (Polygnotos). All these factors are found to be intimately intertwined, for, at this stage of human culture, the spheres of science and art were not so drastically differentiated as in our era. The world of the four elements involved the concepts of polarity and complementarism at every level.
  • THE APOXYOMENOS of LYSIPPUS. in the Hellenic Journal for 1903

    THE APOXYOMENOS of LYSIPPUS. in the Hellenic Journal for 1903

    THE APOXYOMENOS OF LYSIPPUS. IN the Hellenic Journal for 1903, while publishing some heads of Apollo, I took occasion to express my doubts as to the expediency of hereafter taking the Apoxyomenos as the norm of the works of Lysippus. These views, how- ever, were not expressed in any detail, and occurring at the end of a paper devoted to other matters, have not attracted much attention from archaeolo- gists. The subject is of great importance, since if my contention be justified, much of the history of Greek sculpture in the fourth century will have to be reconsidered. Being still convinced of the justice of the view which I took two years ago, I feel bound to bring it forward in more detail and with a fuller statement of reasons. Our knowledge of many of the sculptors of the fourth century, Praxiteles, Scopas, Bryaxis, Timotheus, and others, has been enormously enlarged during the last thirty years through our discovery of works proved by documentary evidence to have been either actually executed by them, or at least made under their direction. But in the case of Lysippus no such discovery was made until the very important identification of the Agias at Delphi as a copy of a statue by this master. Hitherto we had been content to take the Apoxyomenos as the best indication of Lysippic style ; and apparently few archaeologists realized how slender was the evidence on which its assignment to Lysippus was based. That assignment took place many years ago, when archaeological method was lax ; and it has not been subjected to sufficiently searching criticism.
  • Mechanical Miracles: Automata in Ancient Greek Religion

    Mechanical Miracles: Automata in Ancient Greek Religion

    Mechanical Miracles: Automata in Ancient Greek Religion Tatiana Bur A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy Faculty of Arts, University of Sydney Supervisor: Professor Eric Csapo March, 2016 Statement of Originality This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. Tatiana Bur, March 2016. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................... 1 A NOTE TO THE READER ................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 PART I: THINKING ABOUT AUTOMATION .......................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1/ ELIMINATING THE BLOCAGE: ANCIENT AUTOMATA IN MODERN SCHOLARSHIP ................. 10 CHAPTER 2/ INVENTING AUTOMATION: AUTOMATA IN THE ANCIENT GREEK IMAGINATION ................. 24 PART II: AUTOMATA IN CONTEXT ................................................................................... 59 CHAPTER 3/ PROCESSIONAL AUTOMATA ................................................................................
  • Ritual Surprise and Terror in Ancient Greek Possession-Dromena

    Ritual Surprise and Terror in Ancient Greek Possession-Dromena

    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 2 | 1989 Varia Ritual Surprise and Terror in Ancient Greek Possession-Dromena Ioannis Loucas Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/242 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.242 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1989 Number of pages: 97-104 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Ioannis Loucas, « Ritual Surprise and Terror in Ancient Greek Possession-Dromena », Kernos [Online], 2 | 1989, Online since 02 March 2011, connection on 21 April 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/242 ; DOI : 10.4000/kernos.242 Kernos Kernos, 2 (1989), p. 97-104. RITUAL SURPRISE AND TERROR INANCIENT GREEK POSSESSION·DROMENA The daduch of the Eleusinian mysteries Themistokles, descendant of the great Athenian citizen of the 5th century RC'!, is honoured by a decree of 20/19 RC.2 for «he not only exhibits a manner of life worthy of the greatest honour but by the superiority of his service as daduch increases the solemnity and dignity of the cult; thereby the magnificence of the Mysteries is considered by all men to be ofmuch greater excitement (ekplexis) and to have its proper adornment»3. P. Roussel4, followed by K. Clinton5, points out the importance of excitement or surprise (in Greek : ekplexis) in the Mysteries quoting analogous passages from the Eleusinian Oration of Aristides6 and the Platonic Theology ofProclus7, both writers of the Roman times. ln Greek literature one of the earlier cases of terror connected to any cult is that of the terror-stricken priestess ofApollo coming out from the shrine of Delphes in the tragedy Eumenides8 by Aeschylus of Eleusis : Ah ! Horrors, horrors, dire to speak or see, From Loxias' chamber drive me reeling back.

  • AP Art History Greek Study Guide

    AP Art History Greek Study Guide "I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only make them think." - Socrates (470-399 BCE) CH. 5 (p. 101 – 155) Textbook Timeline Geometric Archaic Early Classical High Classical Late Classical Hellenistic 900-700 600 BCE- 480 Severe 450 BCE-400 BCE 400-323 BCE 323 BCE-31 BCE BCE 480 BCE- 450 BCE BCE Artists: Phidias, Artists: Praxiteles, Artists: Pythokritos, Artists: ??? Polykleitos, Myron Scopas, Orientalizing Lysippus Polydorus, Artists: Kritios 700-600 Agesander, Artworks: Artworks: BCE Artworks: Athenodorus kouroi and Artworks: Riace warrior, Aphrodite of Knidos, korai Pedimental Zeus/Poseidon, Hermes & the Infant Artworks: sculpture of the Doryphoros, Dionysus, Dying Gaul, Temple of Diskobolos, Nike Apoxyomenos, Nike of Samothrace, Descriptions: Aphaia and the Adjusting her Farnes Herakles Barberini Faun, Idealization, Temple of Sandal Seated Boxer, Old Market Woman, Artemis, Descriptions: stylized, Laocoon & his Sons FRONTAL, Kritios boy Descriptions: NATURAL, humanized, rigid Idealization, relaxed, Descriptions: unemotional, elongation EMOTIONAL, Descriptions: PERFECTION, dramatic, Contrapposto, self-contained exaggeration, movement movement, individualistic Vocabulary 1. Acropolis 14. Frieze 27. Pediment 2. Agora 15. Gigantomachy 28. Peplos 3. Amphiprostyle 16. Isocephalism 29. Peristyle 4. Amphora 17. In Situ 30. Portico 5. Architrave 18. Ionic 31. Propylaeum 6. Athena 19. Kiln 32. Relief Sculpture 7. Canon 20. Kouros / Kore 33. Shaft 8. Caryatid / Atlantid 21. Krater 34. Stele 9. Contrapposto 22. Metope 35. Stoa 10. Corinthian 23. Mosaic 36. Tholos 11. Cornice 24. Nike 37. Triglyph 12. Doric 25. Niobe 38. Zeus 13. Entablature 26. Panatheonic Way To-do List: ● Know the key ideas, vocabulary, & dates ● Complete the notes pages / Study Guides / any flashcards you may want to add to your ongoing stack ● Visit Khan Academy Image Set Key Ideas *Athenian Agora ● Greeks are interested in the human figure the idea of Geometric perfection.
  • JIIA.Eu Journal of Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Archaeology

    JIIA.Eu Journal of Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Archaeology

    JIIA.eu Journal of Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Archaeology The Masters of the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus Antonio Corso Kanellopoulos Foundation / Messenian Society, Psaromilingou 33, GR10553, Athens, Greece, phone +306939923573,[email protected] The Mausoleum of Halicarnassus is one of the most renowned monuments of the ancient world.1 Mausolus must have decided to set up his monumental tomb in the centre of his newly built capital toward the end of his life: he died in 353 BC.2 After his death, some writers who were renowned in the oratory – Theopompus, Theodectes, Naucrates and less certainly Isocrates – went to the Hecatomnid court at Halicarnassus and took part in the competition held in the capital of Caria in order to deliver the most convincing oration on the death of Mausolus. The agon was won by Theopompus.3 Poets had also been invited on the same occasion.4 After the death of this satrap, the Mausoleum was continued by his wife and successor Artemisia (353-351 BC) and finished after her death,5 thus during the rule of Ada and Idrieus (351-344 BC). The shape of the building is known only generically thanks to the detailed description of the monument given by Pliny 36. 30-31 as well as to surviving elements of the tomb. The Mausoleum was composed of a rectangular podium containing the tomb of the satrap, above which there was a temple-like structure endowed with a peristasis, which was topped by a pyramidal roof, made of steps and supporting a marble quadriga. The architects who had been responsible of the Mausoleum were Satyrus and Pytheus, who also wrote a treatise ‘About the Mausoleum’ (Vitruvius 7, praef.
  • GREEK RELIGION Walter Burkert

    GREEK RELIGION Walter Burkert

    GREEK RELIGION Walter Burkert Translated by John Raffan r Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts THINGS’ ANIMAL SACRIFICE II t . I ‘WORKING SACRED 55 diverted activity for the apathy which remains transfixed in reality; it lays claim to the highest seriousness, to the absolute. II When considered from the point of view of the goal, ritual behaviour appears as magic. For a science of religion which regards only instrumental 4 since acts action as meaningful, magic must be seen as the origin of religion, Ritual and Sanctuary which seek to achieve a given goal in an unclear but direct way are magical. The goal then appears to be the attainment of all desirable boons and the elimination of possible impediments: there is rain magic, fertility magic, love magic, and destructive magic. The conception of ritual as a kind of language, however, leads beyond this constraining artifice; magic is present only insofar as ritual is consciously placed in the service of some end — which may then undoubtedly affect the form of the ritual. Religious ritual is given as a collective institution; the individual participates within the framework of social communication, with the strongest motivating force being the need not in the study of religion which came to be generally acknowledged to stand apart. Conscious magic is a matter for individuals, for the few, and An insight are more important and end of the last century is that rituals is developed accordingly into a highly complicated pseudo-science. In early towards the ancient religions than are instructive for the understanding of the Greece, where the cult belongs in the communal, public sphere, the more is no longer seen in myths.’ With this recognition, antiquity importance of magic is correspondingly minimal.