Greek Art in Motion Studies in Honour of Sir John Boardman ​On the Occasion of His 90Th Birthday

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Greek Art in Motion

Studies in honour of Sir John Boardman on the occasion of his 90th birthday

edited by

Rui Morais, Delfim Leão, Diana Rodríguez Pérez

with

Daniela Ferreira

Archaeopress Archaeology

© Archaeopress and the authors, 2019.

Archaeopress Publishing Ltd

Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG

www.archaeopress.com

ISBN 978 1 78969 023 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 024 8 (e-Pdf)

© Archaeopress and the individual authors 2019

Cover: Head of Alexander in profile. Tourmaline intaglio, 25 x 25 mm, Ashmolean (1892.1499) G.J. Chester Bequest. Photo: C. Wagner.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners.

Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com

© Archaeopress and the authors, 2019.

Contents

Preface ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 John Boardman and Greek Sculpture�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3

Olga Palagia

Sanctuaries and the Hellenistic Polis: An Architectural Approach �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������14

Milena Melfi

‘Even the fragments, however, merit scrutiny’: Ancient Terracottas in the Field and the Museum��������������������������������23

Lucilla Burn

The Good, the Bad, and the Misleading: A Network of Names on (Mainly) Athenian Vases� ��������������������������������������������31

Thomas Mannack

Studying Gems: Collectors and Scholars ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������37

Claudia Wagner

Buildings and History ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������46

P. J. Rhodes

John Boardman at 90: ‘New’ Archaeology or ‘Old’? Confessions of a Crypto-Archaeologist ��������������������������������������������55

Paul Cartledge

Some Recent Developments in the Study of Greeks Overseas��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������59

Gocha R. Tsetskhladze

Sculpture

Godlike Images: Priestesses in Greek Sculpture�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������69

Iphigeneia Leventi

The Nude Constantinople: Masterpieces of Greek Sculpture at Byzantium according to the Greek Anthology��������������������� 78

Carlos A. Martins de Jesus

Ornaments or Amulets: A Peculiar Jewel on Dedicatory Statues���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������85

Olympia Bobou

Architecture

Greek Emporios in Chios: The Archaeological Data from the Excavations of the Last Decades����������������������������������������93

Kokona Roungou and Eleni Vouligea

Temples with a Double Cella: New Thoughts on a Little-Known Type of Temple������������������������������������������������������������106

Ugo Fusco

i

© Archaeopress and the authors, 2019.

Terracotas and Metal

Images of Dionysos, Images for Dionysos: The God’s Terracottas at Cycladic Sanctuaries���������������������������������������������115

Erica Angliker

An Unusual Sympotic Scene on a Silver Cup from Ancient Thrace: Questions of Iconography and Manufacture ��������� 127

Amalia Avramidou

Forgeries in a Museum: A New Approach to Ancient Greek Pottery �������������������������������������������������������������������������������136

Claudina Romero Mayorga

Beyond Trade: The presence of Archaic and Classical Greek Bronze Vessels in the Northern Black Sea Area�������������� 139

Chiara Tarditi

Greek Pottery

Makron’s Eleusinian Mysteries: Vase-Painting, Myth, and Dress in Late Archaic Greece ����������������������������������������������153

Anthony Mangieri

Timagoras: An Athenian Potter to be Rediscovered ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������164

Christine Walter

Revisiting a Plate in the Ashmolean Museum: A New Interpretation������������������������������������������������������������������������������174

Marianne Bergeron

The Greek Pottery of the Tagus Estuary���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������185

Ana Margarida Arrudaand Elisa de Sousa

Vases on Vases: An Overview of Approaches��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������194

Konstantina Tsonaka

Intriguing Objects of Desire: Collecting Greek Vases, a Short History Unfolded ������������������������������������������������������������204

Daniela Freitas Ferreira

Youth in an Enclosed Context: New Notes on the Attic Pottery from the Iberian Tútugi Necropolis (Granada, Galera)���� 212

Carmen Rueda and Ricardo Olmos

An Overview of Brazilian Studies on Greek Pottery: Tradition and Future Perspectives �����������������������������������������������226

Carolina Kesser Barcellos Diasand Camila Diogo de Souza

Coins

Sculptures and Coins: A Contextual Case Study from Side ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������239

Alice Landskron

The Romanitas of Mark Antony’s Eastern Coins����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������249

João Paulo Simões Valério

War and Numismatics in Greek Sicily: Two Sides of the Same Coin ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������259

José Miguel Puebla Morón

ii

© Archaeopress and the authors, 2019.

Iconography of Poseidon in Greek Coinage����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������264

María Rodríguez López

The Silver Akragatine Tetradrachms with Quadriga: A New Catalogue ���������������������������������������������������������������������������276

Viviana Lo Monaco

Gems and Glass

Why was Actaeon Punished? Reading and Seeing the Evolution of a Myth���������������������������������������������������������������������287

José Malheiro Magalhães

Greek Myth on Magical Gems: Survivals and Revivals�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������299

Paolo Vitellozzi

From Routine to Reconstruction ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������311

Susan Walker

Greek History and Archaeology

The Database of the Iberia Graeca Centre ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������325

Xavier Aquilué, Paloma Cabrera and Pol Carreras

The Greeks Overseas: A Bioarchaeological Approach ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������335

Tasos Zisis and Christina Papageorgopoulou

The Messenian Island of Prote and its Relation to Navigation in Greece and the Mediterranean����������������������������������343

Stamatis A. Fritzilas

Naukratis - Yet Again��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������355

Astrid Möller

The Tomb of the Roaring Lions at Veii: Its Relation to Greek Geometric and Early Orientalizing Art���������������������������358

Gabriele Koiner

Perserschutt in Eretria? Pottery from a Pit in the Agora��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������366

Tamara Saggini

Greeks Overseas

A Bridge to Overseas: Insight into the geomorphology, harbourworks and harbour layouts of the Archaic and Classical Greek harbours �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������377

Chiara Maria Mauro

Gandharan Odalisque: Mounted Nereids on Gandharan Stone Palettes��������������������������������������������������������������������������386

SeungJung Kim

The Attic Pottery from the Persephoneion of Locri Epizefiri between Ritual Practices and Worship����������������������������396

Elvia Giudice and Giada Giudice

Was Knossos a Home for Phoenician Traders?�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������408

Judith Muñoz Sogas

iii

© Archaeopress and the authors, 2019.

Greek Divine Cures Overseas: Italian Realisations of the Greek Paradigm����������������������������������������������������������������������417

Lidia Ożarowska

Reception and Collecting

Wine and Blood? Dionysus, Other Gods and Heroes in a Catholic Chapel of Britiande (Lamego, Portugal) �������������������431

Nuno Resende

Pavlovsk Imperial Villa and its Collections: From the First Stage of Antiquities Collecting and Archaeology in Russia ���441

Anastasia Bukina and Anna Petrakova

Art and Myth

Greek Myths Abroad: A Comparative, Iconographic Study of Their Funerary Uses in Ancient Italy������������������������������455

Valeria Riedemann Lorca

Orphica Non Grata? Underworld Palace Scenes on Apulian Red-Figure Pottery Revisited���������������������������������������������465

Karolina Sekita

Geryon in Tatarli���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������475

Malcolm Davies

New Identifications of Heroes and Heroines on the West Pediment of the Parthenon: The Case of P, Q, and R ������������480

Ioannis Mitsios

A New Sicilian Curse Corpus: A Blueprint for a Geographical and Chronological Analysis of Defixiones from Sicily �����489

Thea Sommerschield

Once Again: A Sacrificing Goddess� Demeter - What´s up with her Attribute?����������������������������������������������������������������502

Maria Christidis and Heinrike Dourdoumas

iv

© Archaeopress and the authors, 2019.

Godlike Images: Priestesses in Greek Sculpture

Iphigeneia Leventi

The first almost certain depiction of a priestess in action can be found on the east frieze of the Parthenon. There is general consensus among scholars concerning the identification of the mature female figure in the middle of slab V as the priestess of Athena Polias, shown with her back turned to the man in priestly garment who is dealing with the peplos. Even though the iconographic type of this priestess is a generic one

with no evident relation to the sculptural representations of

the female deity she serves, also lacking identifying attributes like the temple key or the xoanon of the goddess, her identity is established by the context in which she appears, and especially her interaction with the two female attendants,

who are recognised as arrephoroi or kanephoroi.1 A similar

scene can be seen on the early Classical clay Locrian pinakes, where a priestess is depicted with one or more attendants, or

with a host of devotees in a ritual performance.2

The most renowned surviving statue of a Greek priestess is that of Hegeso (formerly known as Nikeso) from Priene, a marble headless statue on display in the Antikensammlung in Berlin inv. no. Sk 1928 (Fig. 1), dating to the first half of the 3rd century BC. Hegeso has been identified as a priestess of Demeter and Kore on the basis of the accompanying votive

inscription.3 She is dressed in chiton and a voluminous

mantle, her right arm and left hand lost. The main features of this priestess statue are the crinkly texture of her mantle and the long hair falling on her back and shoulders in front. Both features are highly unusual for the iconography of a female portrait statue, but accord well with the iconography of the goddess Demeter whom Hegeso served. The texture of her mantle is thought to represent the special fabric of a highly elaborate garment that evokes the famous Coae vestes.4 In fact, however, the unusual rippling treatment of the entire mantle

was employed on purpose in order to reflect the realistically creased drapery of the seated Demeter from Knidos in the

British Museum inv. no. 1051, a marble original of the fourth

century BC.5

Figure 1. Hegeso from Priene. Berlin, Antikensammlung inv. no. Sk
1928. Photo: author.

The slightly over-life-size (1.73 m.) Priene statue, the epigraphic formula of its inscription, as well as its position next to another honorific statue (now lost) representing a priestess of the same goddesses at the entrance of their sanctuary, provide sufficient evidence for its identification as a statue of Hegeso Hipposthenous, a priestess of Demeter and Kore. The attributes of Hegeso pose a problem. The kalathos on her head suggested by H. Schrader is highly improbable, as it is not documented in the iconography of priestesses. Furthermore, it would have turned the statue into a cistophoros, a type reserved for Caryatids in Greek sculpture.6 The other suggestions that have been put forward

propose that the priestess either carried a hydria on her

head supporting it with her raised right hand, or that she

held a torch in the same hand.7 The first suggestion would

have underlined her mission as the servant of the goddess,

1ꢀ The identification with arrephoroi by Deubner 1932: 12, pl. 1.1 remained influential. See recently, Meyer 2017: 235-240, fig. 130. Palagia 2008: 33, identified the two maidens as kanephoroi . Cf. Mantis 1990: 79-80, pl. 33a, and 78-80, pl. 33b, on the identification of the

priestess.

2ꢀ Kaufmann-Samaras and Szabados 2004: 436-437, nos. 153a-b, with drawings. Marroni and Torelli 2016: 54-58, figs. 34-37, recognizing the

scene as a kind of peplophoria.

3ꢀ

Schrader: in Wiegand and Schrader 1904: 149-151, figs. 118-120; Mantis 1990: 98-99, fig. 44b; Connelly 2007: 137-139, fig. 5.12; Dillon 2010: 77-78, n. 318, and 124-126, fig. 2 (cast) and 65 (back view). On the new reading of the priestess’ name as Hegeso, Queyrel 2016: 166, fig. 145. Cf. http://arachne.uni-koeln.de/item/objekt/34627 (K. Hallof).

4ꢀ See Connelly 2007: 137-138 with n. 91.

6ꢀ

Schrader: in Wiegand and Schrader 1904: 151. On Caryatids,
Stephanidou-Tiveriou 2007: especially 500-502, figs. 5-7, 10; Palagia 2016: figs.1-3, 10-11.

  • 5ꢀ Ridgway 1997: 332-333, pl. 79a-c.
  • 7ꢀ A torch was suggested by Kron 1996: 148.

69

© Archaeopress and the authors, 2019.

Greek Art in Motion. Studies in honour of Sir John Boardman on the occasion of his 90th birthday

Figure 3. Aristonoe   from Rhamnous. Athens, National
Archaeological Museum inv. no. 232.   Detail: Head. Photo: author.

of grain and poppies.9 The torch as an attribute of Hegeso, priestess of Demeter and Kore, is a more plausible suggestion, since a large circular hole for its insertion once existed on the right side of the upper part of her base, only evident today as a break on its surface.10 Alternatively, she may have held a long scepter as priestesses can appropriate divine attributes.11

Let us now proceed to the late Hellenistic period to observe the statue of another known priestess, that of the Athenian Aristonoe (Fig. 2) who served the mighty goddess Nemesis,

worshipped in the provincial sanctuary in the northeastern

coast of Attica at the deme of Rhamnous. This life-size female statue was found almost intact together with its inscribed base during the excavations of the smaller Archaic temple of Nemesis at Rhamnous, and was transferred to the National Archaeological Museum of Athens inv. no. 232, where it remains today. When it was found in 1891, the hand of the now missing inserted right forearm held a small phiale.12

Figure 2. Aristonoe   from Rhamnous. Athens, National Archaeological Museum inv. no. 232. Photo: author.

in view of the hydriaphoroi terracotta statuettes representing female votaries that were widely diffused in the Greek world, serving as votive offerings in several of Demeter and Kore’s sanctuaries.8 The second would have emphasized instead her godlike image in view of her comparison to the Eleusinian deities she served. Another example of such godlike attributes is offered by depictions of female devotees of Demeter on grave reliefs from Smyrna dating to the later Hellenistic period. The devotees on these grave reliefs are portrayed standing next to a large torch, and occasionally hold shafts

9ꢀ Klöckner 2013: especially 317, figs. 1-15. 10ꢀ Schrader: in Wiegand and Schrader 1904: fig. 118; Connelly 2007: fig. 5.12; Dillon 2010: 78. 11ꢀ Like the priestess of the Argive Hera bearing a temple key and scepter on an Attic red-figure hydria by the Agrigento Painter in Boston, Museum of Fine Arts inv. no. 08.417: Connelly 2007: 71-72 with n. 24, 82, fig. 3.3; Ridgway 1990: 211-212, suggested a scepter for Hegeso. 12ꢀ Stais 1891: 53-55, fig. on p. 46, pls. 3-5; Mantis 1990: 103, 109, pl. 46β; Connelly 2007: 145-146, 234, fig. 5.14; Dillon 2010: 76-77, 106-108, fig. 1 (left-right as on the cover), 46-47; Cf. Keesling 2012: 498 n. 107,
8ꢀ See Mantis 1990: 98-99 with n. 425, pl. 44b. Cf. the discussion in Connelly 2007: 137-138. Recently also, Queyrel 2016: 166-167.

70

© Archaeopress and the authors, 2019.

Iphigeneia Leventi – Godlike Images: Priestesses in Greek Sculpture

  • Figure 4. Attic Grave Relief of Hieron from Rhamnous. Athens,
  • Figure 5. Attic grave relief of Hieron from Rhamnous. Athens,

National Archeological Museum inv. no. 833. Detail. Head of Lysippe.
Photo: D-DAI-ATH-NM 4666, Eva Maria Czakó.
National Archaeological Museum inv. no.   833. Detail. Head of
Lysippe. Photo: D-DAI-ATH-NM 4665, Eva Maria Czakó.

According to the votive inscription, the statue of Aristonoe was dedicated by her son Hierokles Hieropoiou to both Themis and Nemesis, who were venerated together in the

city sanctuary of Rhamnous. Aristonoe dons a chiton and a

diagonal mantle that is transparent in the abdomen area, enveloping both her arms down to the elbows. A priestly strophion is visible only in the front of her head, above the forehead (Fig. 3). The mature age of Aristonoe is revealed by the fact that the dedication was made by her son and is corroborated by the ‘Venus rings’ visible on her neck and the subtle wrinkles on her face. since the right flank is thrust to the side, while the upper body tilts to the left. And last but not least, her mantle is full of the characteristic late Hellenistic crease marks.14 All these point to a date in the second half of the 2nd and /or the early

part of the 1st century BC. Of interest to us is the fact that

the statuary type of Aristonoe is also used for the goddess identified as Themis on a fourth-century votive relief found in Rhamnous and recomposed from two fragments: one in the British Museum, the other in the Rhamnous Archaeological

Recommended publications
  • Athenians and Eleusinians in the West Pediment of the Parthenon

    Athenians and Eleusinians in the West Pediment of the Parthenon

    ATHENIANS AND ELEUSINIANS IN THE WEST PEDIMENT OF THE PARTHENON (PLATE 95) T HE IDENTIFICATION of the figuresin the west pedimentof the Parthenonhas long been problematic.I The evidencereadily enables us to reconstructthe composition of the pedimentand to identify its central figures.The subsidiaryfigures, however, are rath- er more difficult to interpret. I propose that those on the left side of the pediment may be identifiedas membersof the Athenian royal family, associatedwith the goddessAthena, and those on the right as membersof the Eleusinian royal family, associatedwith the god Posei- don. This alignment reflects the strife of the two gods on a heroic level, by referringto the legendary war between Athens and Eleusis. The recognition of the disjunctionbetween Athenians and Eleusinians and of parallelism and contrastbetween individualsand groups of figures on the pedimentpermits the identificationof each figure. The referenceto Eleusis in the pediment,moreover, indicates the importanceof that city and its majorcult, the Eleu- sinian Mysteries, to the Athenians. The referencereflects the developmentand exploitation of Athenian control of the Mysteries during the Archaic and Classical periods. This new proposalfor the identificationof the subsidiaryfigures of the west pedimentthus has critical I This article has its origins in a paper I wrote in a graduateseminar directedby ProfessorJohn Pollini at The Johns Hopkins University in 1979. I returned to this paper to revise and expand its ideas during 1986/1987, when I held the Jacob Hirsch Fellowship at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. In the summer of 1988, I was given a grant by the Committeeon Research of Tulane University to conduct furtherresearch for the article.
  • 1 BRITISH SCHOOL at ATHENS 47Th Annual Course For

    1 BRITISH SCHOOL at ATHENS 47Th Annual Course For

    1 BRITISH SCHOOL AT ATHENS 47th Annual Course for Undergraduates The Archaeology and Topography of Ancient Greece 18th August – 7th September 2019 PROVISIONAL ITINERARY DATE DAY TIME SITE AUGUST 08.30-23.30 Arrival at the BSA Sunday 18 1 20.00 Informal dinner Monday 19 2 08.00-09.30 Breakfast 09.30-10.15 Introductory Session in Finlay Common Room 10.15-11.00 Library and Archive Tour 11.00-11.30 Coffee Break in Finlay 11.30-13.00 Key Themes I: The history of archaeology and the archaeology of history in Greece (Museum) 13.00-14.00 Buffet Lunch in Dining Room 14.00-15.30 Key Themes II: Ways of approaching archaeological sites (Museum) 15.30-17.00 Key Themes III: Archaeological Science (Fitch) 19.30 BBQ on the Finlay Terrace Tuesday 20 3 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 The Acropolis (including the interior of the Parthenon) (Lunch – self bought) The south Slope of the Acropolis Wednesday 21 4 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 The Athenian Agora and Museum The Areopagos, Philopappos Hill, The Pnyx (Lunch – self bought) The Acropolis Museum Thursday 22 5 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 Kerameikos Library of Hadrian (Lunch – self bought) Roman Agora, Little Metropolis, Arch of Hadrian, Temple of Olympian Zeus Friday 23 6 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 The National Archaeological Museum I (Mycenaean gallery, Pottery collection) (Lunch – self bought) The National Archaeological Museum II (Sculpture collection) Saturday 24 7 08.00-09.00 Breakfast 09.00 Piraeus Museum FREE AFTERNOON Sunday 25 8 FREE DAY 2 Monday 26 9 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 BSA Museum Cycladic
  • The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts

    The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts

    THE NATURE OF HELLENISTIC DOMESTIC SCULPTURE IN ITS CULTURAL AND SPATIAL CONTEXTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig I. Hardiman, B.Comm., B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Mark D. Fullerton, Advisor Dr. Timothy J. McNiven _______________________________ Advisor Dr. Stephen V. Tracy Graduate Program in the History of Art Copyright by Craig I. Hardiman 2005 ABSTRACT This dissertation marks the first synthetic and contextual analysis of domestic sculpture for the whole of the Hellenistic period (323 BCE – 31 BCE). Prior to this study, Hellenistic domestic sculpture had been examined from a broadly literary perspective or had been the focus of smaller regional or site-specific studies. Rather than taking any one approach, this dissertation examines both the literary testimonia and the material record in order to develop as full a picture as possible for the location, function and meaning(s) of these pieces. The study begins with a reconsideration of the literary evidence. The testimonia deal chiefly with the residences of the Hellenistic kings and their conspicuous displays of wealth in the most public rooms in the home, namely courtyards and dining rooms. Following this, the material evidence from the Greek mainland and Asia Minor is considered. The general evidence supports the literary testimonia’s location for these sculptures. In addition, several individual examples offer insights into the sophistication of domestic decorative programs among the Greeks, something usually associated with the Romans.
  • Between the Cults of Syria and Arabia: Traces of Pagan Religion at Umm Al-Jimål

    Between the Cults of Syria and Arabia: Traces of Pagan Religion at Umm Al-Jimål

    !"#$%&"%'#(")*%+!"$,""-%$."%/01$)%23%45#(6%6-&%7#68(69%:#6;")%23%<6=6-%>"1(=(2-%6$% % ?@@%61AB(@61*C%!"#$%&'(%)("*&(+%'",-.(/)$(0-1*/&,2,3.(,4(5,-$/)(6D%7@@6-9% % E"F6#$@"-$%23%7-$(G0($(")%23%B2#&6-%HIJJKL9%MNNAMKMD% Bert de Vries Bert de Vries Department of History Calvin College Grand Rapids, MI 49546 U.S.A. Between the Cults of Syria and Arabia: Traces of Pagan Religion at Umm al-Jimål Introduction Such a human construction of religion as a so- Umm al-Jimål ’s location in the southern Hauran cial mechanism to achieve security does not pre- puts it at the intersection of the cultures of Arabia to clude the possibility that a religion may be based the south and Syria to the north. While its political on theological eternal verities (Berger 1969: 180- geography places it in the Nabataean and Roman 181). However, it does open up the possibility of an realms of Arabia, its cultural geography locates it archaeology of religion that transcends the custom- in the Hauran, linked to the northern Hauran. Seen ary descriptions of cult centers and cataloguing of on a more economic cultural axis, Umm al-Jimål altars, statues, implements and decorative elements. is between Syria as Bilåd ash-Shåm, the region of That is, it presupposes the possibility of a larger agricultural communities, and the Badiya, the re- interpretive context for these “traces” of religion gion of pastoral nomad encampments. Life of soci- using the methodology of cognitive archaeology. ety on these intersecting axes brought a rich variety The term “traces” is meant in the technical sense of economic, political and religious cross-currents of Assmann’s theory of memory (2002: 6-11).
  • Parthenon 1 Parthenon

    Parthenon 1 Parthenon

    Parthenon 1 Parthenon Parthenon Παρθενών (Greek) The Parthenon Location within Greece Athens central General information Type Greek Temple Architectural style Classical Location Athens, Greece Coordinates 37°58′12.9″N 23°43′20.89″E Current tenants Museum [1] [2] Construction started 447 BC [1] [2] Completed 432 BC Height 13.72 m (45.0 ft) Technical details Size 69.5 by 30.9 m (228 by 101 ft) Other dimensions Cella: 29.8 by 19.2 m (98 by 63 ft) Design and construction Owner Greek government Architect Iktinos, Kallikrates Other designers Phidias (sculptor) The Parthenon (Ancient Greek: Παρθενών) is a temple on the Athenian Acropolis, Greece, dedicated to the Greek goddess Athena, whom the people of Athens considered their patron. Its construction began in 447 BC and was completed in 438 BC, although decorations of the Parthenon continued until 432 BC. It is the most important surviving building of Classical Greece, generally considered to be the culmination of the development of the Doric order. Its decorative sculptures are considered some of the high points of Greek art. The Parthenon is regarded as an Parthenon 2 enduring symbol of Ancient Greece and of Athenian democracy and one of the world's greatest cultural monuments. The Greek Ministry of Culture is currently carrying out a program of selective restoration and reconstruction to ensure the stability of the partially ruined structure.[3] The Parthenon itself replaced an older temple of Athena, which historians call the Pre-Parthenon or Older Parthenon, that was destroyed in the Persian invasion of 480 BC. Like most Greek temples, the Parthenon was used as a treasury.
  • The Romanization of Attic Ritual Space in the Age of Augustus

    The Romanization of Attic Ritual Space in the Age of Augustus

    The Romanization of Attic Ritual Space in the Age of Augustus Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Benavides, Makayla Lorraine Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 14:30:47 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/633170 THE ROMANIZATION OF ATTIC RITUAL SPACE IN THE AGE OF AUGUSTUS by Makayla Benavides ____________________________ Copyright © Makayla Benavides 2019 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES AND CLASSICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019 1 7 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Master's Committee, we certify that we have read the thesis prepared by Makayla Benavides titled The Romanizationof Attic Ritual Space in the Age ofAugustus and recommend that it be accepted as fulfillingthe dissertation requirement for the Master's Degree. Date: .r- / - :.?CJ/ 5f David Soren Date: S - I - 2..o I � Mary E Voyatzis David Gilman Romano Date: ----- [Committee Member Name} Final approval and acceptance of this thesis is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the thesis to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this thesis prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfillingthe Master's requirement.
  • 1 from City-State to Region-State

    1 from City-State to Region-State

    The Athenian Experiment: Building an Imagined Political Community in Ancient Attica, 508-490 B.C. Greg Anderson http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=17798 The University of Michigan Press 1 FROM CITY-STATE TO REGION-STATE What exactly do we mean when we say that Attica in the classical period was politically “incorporated” or “uniµed”? If, for the purposes of analysis, we unpack the idea of the polis, we can distinguish three essential levels or sources of political unity in the Attic peninsula. First and most fundamental, the reach of Athenian state institutions ex- tended to the territorial limits of Attica, and this apparatus was recognized as the ultimate locus of political authority for the entire region. Second, all free, native-born, adult males in Attica were eligible to become citizens of Athens, entitling them—even obliging them—to participate in the civil, military, and religious life of the polis. From / on, enrollment took place locally in one of town and village units, or demes, scattered throughout the peninsula and was administered by one’s fellow demesmen. Third, despite the unusually large size of the polis, citizens appear to have been bound to one another by a pow- erful and at times distinctly chauvinistic form of collective consciousness or identity. Each citizen was encouraged to imagine himself a member of a sin- gle, extended, undifferentiated community of “Athenians,” sharing with his fellows a common history, culture, and destiny that set them apart from all other such communities. For most modern authorities, these distinctions will seem artiµcial and per- haps anachronistic, since it is widely felt that, unlike the nation-states of our own times, the Greek polis in general and the Athenian instance in particular 13 The Athenian Experiment: Building an Imagined Political Community in Ancient Attica, 508-490 B.C.
  • A Garrison at Oropos?

    A Garrison at Oropos?

    A Garrison at Oropos? The primary military function of the Athenian ephebeia in the Lycurgan era (and the likely reason for its existence) was to protect the inhabitants of Attica against small bands of raiders originating from Boeotia. According to the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia “ephebes patrol the countryside and spend time in the guard-posts (phylakteria)” in the second year of their national service (42.4: περιπολοῦσι τὴν χώραν καὶ διατρίβουσιν ἐν τοῖς φυλακτηρίοις). If the ephebeia was created sometime after Alexander of Macedon’s destruction of Thebes in September 335 BCE, it would mean that the terminus post quem for the regular deployment of a minimum of one phyle of ephebes at these phylakteria was 333/2 BCE (Friend 2019). The epigraphic habit of the ephebes who had garrisoned the defensive infrastructure of Attica in the 330s and 320s BCE, until the probable abolition of the ephebeia after the Lamian War, permits the identification of the Athenaion Politeia’s unnamed “guard-posts”. An analysis of those end of service dedications erected by individual ephebic phylai reveals that the phylakteria would have consisted of fortified demes (Eleusis, Rhamnous, and Oinoe) and of border forts (Phyle and Panactum) situated at the Attic-Boeotian frontier or at the northeastern coast of Attica. Did the ephebes also garrison Oropos after the acquisition of the frontier stronghold from Alexander in 335/4 (rather than from Philip in 338/7), just as in the Peloponnesian War (Thuc. 8.60.1)? Two arguments can be adduced in support of the view that ephebes (and presumably their older compatriots) were responsible for patrolling the Oropia.
  • Mechanical Miracles: Automata in Ancient Greek Religion

    Mechanical Miracles: Automata in Ancient Greek Religion

    Mechanical Miracles: Automata in Ancient Greek Religion Tatiana Bur A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy Faculty of Arts, University of Sydney Supervisor: Professor Eric Csapo March, 2016 Statement of Originality This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. Tatiana Bur, March 2016. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................... 1 A NOTE TO THE READER ................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 PART I: THINKING ABOUT AUTOMATION .......................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1/ ELIMINATING THE BLOCAGE: ANCIENT AUTOMATA IN MODERN SCHOLARSHIP ................. 10 CHAPTER 2/ INVENTING AUTOMATION: AUTOMATA IN THE ANCIENT GREEK IMAGINATION ................. 24 PART II: AUTOMATA IN CONTEXT ................................................................................... 59 CHAPTER 3/ PROCESSIONAL AUTOMATA ................................................................................
  • The City and the Coin in the Ancient and Early Medieval Worlds

    The City and the Coin in the Ancient and Early Medieval Worlds

    The City and the Coin in the Ancient and Early Medieval Worlds Edited by Fernando López Sánchez BAR International Series 2402 2012 Published by Archaeopress Publishers of British Archaeological Reports Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED England [email protected] www.archaeopress.com BAR S2402 The City and the Coin in the Ancient and Early Medieval Worlds © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2012 ISBN 978 1 4073 0997 2 Cover coin: RPC1 172, Obv: AVGVSTVS DIVI F, bare gead, r.; Rev: C LAETILIVS APALVS II V Q, diadem (with crescent and lotus above) enclosing REX PTOL. The Trustess of the British Museum. Printed in England by CMP (UK) Ltd All BAR titles are available from: Hadrian Books Ltd 122 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7BP England www.hadrianbooks.co.uk The current BAR catalogue with details of all titles in print, prices and means of payment is available free from Hadrian Books or may be downloaded from www.archaeopress.com Actia Nicopolis. Coinage, currency and civic identity (27 BC-AD 268) Dario Calomino abstract Nicopolis of Epirus (north-western Greece), founded by Octavian to commemorate the Actium victory over Marc Antony and Cleopatra in 31 BC, was also known as “Actia Nicopolis”. Ancient authors’ reports suggest that the city profited from very special imperial benefits: a privileged administrative statute (as civitas libera and probably foederata), a pre-eminent political position in the Delphic Amphictiony and in the province (as capital of Epirus), a leading ethnic-cultural role in western Greece (being populated through interregional synoecism), a strong symbolic meaning for the Roman policy in Greece (as the only proper Greek foundation of Augustus).
  • AAIA Bulletin 15

    AAIA Bulletin 15

    Volume 15, 2019 The Australian Archaeological Institute at Athens BULLETIN Volume 15, 2019 1 The AAIA Bulletin Table of Contents Letter from the Acting Director Letter from the Acting Director 2 ACTIVITIES IN GREECE & CYPRUS As regular readers of the AAIA Bulletin would have come to expect Acting Director’s Report from Athens 4 this issue contains a survey of some of the many activities which the Museums and Exhibitions in Greece 6 AAIA, its institutional members, and Friends groups undertook in 2018. Australian Paliochora Kythera Archaeological Survey 2018 10 The year was as busy as it was rewarding. Numerous research projects Nea Paphos Theatre: 2018 Season 12 (both individual and team-based) were conducted, public outreach The Plataia Battlefield Survey 14 AAIA Contemporary Creative programmes planned and executed, as well as seminars and lectures Resident 2018 16 organized. All these accomplishments take time and organization, and I University of Wollongong AAIA 2018 Artist-in-Residence 17 would like to thank the staff of the Institute, both in Sydney and Athens, 2017-2018 AAIA Fellow in Athens along with our many colleagues and supporters throughout Australia Report by Alastair Blanshard 18 2017-2018 AAIA Fellow in Athens and Greece for all their help. Report by Estelle Strazdins 20 Among the articles in this issue of the Bulletin you will read accounts FEATURE ARTICLES of recent Australian fieldwork in Greece and Cyprus, reports from Uncanny Stones as Amulets in the various scholarship holders, and two papers by academics from the Ancient Greek World by Christopher Faraone 22 United States who recently visited Australia.
  • Ritual Surprise and Terror in Ancient Greek Possession-Dromena

    Ritual Surprise and Terror in Ancient Greek Possession-Dromena

    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 2 | 1989 Varia Ritual Surprise and Terror in Ancient Greek Possession-Dromena Ioannis Loucas Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/242 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.242 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1989 Number of pages: 97-104 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Ioannis Loucas, « Ritual Surprise and Terror in Ancient Greek Possession-Dromena », Kernos [Online], 2 | 1989, Online since 02 March 2011, connection on 21 April 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/242 ; DOI : 10.4000/kernos.242 Kernos Kernos, 2 (1989), p. 97-104. RITUAL SURPRISE AND TERROR INANCIENT GREEK POSSESSION·DROMENA The daduch of the Eleusinian mysteries Themistokles, descendant of the great Athenian citizen of the 5th century RC'!, is honoured by a decree of 20/19 RC.2 for «he not only exhibits a manner of life worthy of the greatest honour but by the superiority of his service as daduch increases the solemnity and dignity of the cult; thereby the magnificence of the Mysteries is considered by all men to be ofmuch greater excitement (ekplexis) and to have its proper adornment»3. P. Roussel4, followed by K. Clinton5, points out the importance of excitement or surprise (in Greek : ekplexis) in the Mysteries quoting analogous passages from the Eleusinian Oration of Aristides6 and the Platonic Theology ofProclus7, both writers of the Roman times. ln Greek literature one of the earlier cases of terror connected to any cult is that of the terror-stricken priestess ofApollo coming out from the shrine of Delphes in the tragedy Eumenides8 by Aeschylus of Eleusis : Ah ! Horrors, horrors, dire to speak or see, From Loxias' chamber drive me reeling back.