DOCSLIB.ORG

Theriomorphic Forms: Analyzing Terrestrial Animal- Human Hybrids in Ancient Greek Culture and Religion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Theriomorphic Forms: Analyzing Terrestrial Animal- Human Hybrids in Ancient Greek Culture and Religion Theriomorphic Forms: Analyzing Terrestrial Animal- Human Hybrids in Ancient Greek Culture and Religion Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Carter, Caroline LynnLee Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 21:29:46 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/633185 THERIOMORPHIC FORMS: ANALYZING TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL-HUMAN HYBRIDS IN ANCIENT GREEK CULTURE AND RELIGION by Caroline Carter ____________________________ Copyright © Caroline Carter 2019 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES AND CLASSICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019 THE UNIYERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Master's Committee, we certi$ that we have read the thesis prepared by Caroline Carter titled Theriomorphic Forms: Analyzing Terrestrial Animal-Humøn Hybrids in Ancíent Greek Culture and Religion and reç¡¡ü¡sr6 that it be accepted as firlfilling the disse¡tation requirement for the Master's Degree. G Date: + 26 Z¿f T MaryV o 1.011 ,AtÌ.r.ln Date: \l 41 , Dr. David Gilman Romano - 4*--l -r Date; { zé l2 Dr. David Soren r) øate:4'2 6 - l\ Dr. Kyle Mahoney Final approval and acceptance of this thesis is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the thesis to the Graduate College. I hereby certiff that I have read this thesis prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as firlfilling tlre Master's requirement. ,r-- É.v *,3*^ Date zß ?Ã ,? ndøuty Voya@iÀ A -),^*-Master's Thesis Committee Chair Professor, School of Anthropology and Deparünent of Religious Studies and Classics 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the faculty at the University of Arizona for their continued support during my M.A. coursework, especially Dr. David Gilman Romano and Dr. David Soren. I extend special acknowledgment to Dr. Mary Voyatzis who encouraged me to explore this topic and introduced me to the wonders of ancient Arcadia. I also thank Dr. Kyle Mahoney (Swarthmore College) for his guidance and many fruitful discussions during the process of writing this thesis. I am also eternally grateful to my friends and family who have always supported my ambitions. My friends include those I made at UNC Chapel Hill, my cohort at UA, and my long-time friends from Murphy, NC. I thank my father, Norman Carter, for teaching me to never give up; my aunt, Gwen Holmes, who encouraged my love of history; my cousins (Buck, Marin, and Ian Holmes) for their continued support; and especially my mother, Genia Carter, for everything. Finally, I must thank all of my many childhood pets for showing me how much animals can give to the world. I am especially grateful for my cat, Sophie. 3 DEDICATION For my Mother 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS ................................................................................. 7 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 7 ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... 12 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 14 1.1 REVIEW OF SCHOLARSHIP ......................................................................................... 14 1.1.a Previous Scholarship ......................................................................................... 15 1.1.b Modern Scholarship .......................................................................................... 16 1.2 METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH .............................................................................. 18 1.2.a Scope ................................................................................................................. 18 1.2.b Terminology ...................................................................................................... 21 1.2.c Categorization of Hybrids ................................................................................. 22 1.2.d Criteria and Evidence ........................................................................................ 23 1.2.e Significance ....................................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 2: EVIDENCE............................................................................................. 27 2.1 HORSE ...................................................................................................................... 27 2.1.a Centaurs ............................................................................................................. 27 2.1.b Cheiron .............................................................................................................. 31 2.1.c Demeter Melaina ............................................................................................... 33 2.1.d Satyrs ................................................................................................................. 36 2.2 GOAT AND RAM ........................................................................................................ 38 2.2.a Pan ..................................................................................................................... 38 2.2.b Apollo Kereatas ................................................................................................. 47 2.2.c Apollo Karneios ................................................................................................. 48 2.2.d Zeus Ammon ..................................................................................................... 51 2.3 BULL ......................................................................................................................... 53 2.3.a Acheloos ............................................................................................................ 53 2.3.b Minotaur ............................................................................................................ 55 2.4 SNAKE ...................................................................................................................... 56 2.4.a Kekrops.............................................................................................................. 56 2.5 OTHER THERIOMORPHIC ICONOGRAPHY ................................................................... 59 2.5.a Iconography from Lykosoura ............................................................................ 59 2.5.b Figurine(s) from Tegea ...................................................................................... 60 2.5.c Figurine from Petrovouni/Methydrion .............................................................. 62 CHAPTER 3: DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS .......................................................... 64 3.1 TERRESTRIAL THERIOMORPHISM AND TIME ............................................................. 64 3.1.a Bronze Age Connections ................................................................................... 64 Theriomorphic Iconography .............................................................................. 65 Minoan Genius .................................................................................................. 70 5 3.1.b Origins of Terrestrial Hybrids in Greece ........................................................... 71 3.2 TERRESTRIAL THERIOMORPHISM AND LOCATION ..................................................... 76 3.2.a Concentrations ................................................................................................... 76 Arcadia .............................................................................................................. 78 Identity ............................................................................................................... 82 3.2.b Connections ....................................................................................................... 83 Landscapes: Caves ............................................................................................ 83 Outside Cultural Influences .............................................................................. 85 3.3 TERRESTRIAL THERIOMORPHISM AND REPRESENTATION ......................................... 91 3.3.a Theriomorphism and Anthropomorphism ......................................................... 92 3.3.b Significance of Terrestrial Animal Attributes ................................................... 93 Horse ............................................................................................................... 94 Goat and Sheep ................................................................................................ 96 Bull ................................................................................................................... 97 Snake ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greek Art in Motion Studies in Honour of Sir John Boardman ​On the Occasion of His 90Th Birthday
    Greek Art in Motion Studies in honour of Sir John Boardman on the occasion of his 90th birthday edited by Rui Morais, Delfim Leão, Diana Rodríguez Pérez with Daniela Ferreira Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2019. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78969 023 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 024 8 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2019 Cover: Head of Alexander in profile. Tourmaline intaglio, 25 x 25 mm, Ashmolean (1892.1499) G.J. Chester Bequest. Photo: C. Wagner. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2019. Contents Preface ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 John Boardman and Greek Sculpture �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 Olga Palagia Sanctuaries and the Hellenistic Polis: An Architectural Approach �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 Milena Melfi ‘Even the fragments, however, merit scrutiny’: Ancient
    [Show full text]
  • Top Things to Do in Santorini" a Volcanic Group of Islands on the Aegean Sea, Santorini Is a Very Famous Tourist Destination
    "Top Things To Do in Santorini" A volcanic group of islands on the Aegean Sea, Santorini is a very famous tourist destination. Known for its azure waters, historic relics and fascinating Cycladic architecture, Santorini is a Mediterranean paradise in the truest sense. Criado por : Cityseeker 10 Localizações indicadas Playa de Kamari "Mediterranean Sun and Sand" Blue waters, soft white sands, and the warm Mediterranean sun on your face, Santorini's Playa de Kamari or the Kamari Beach checks all the boxes for an hour or two by the sea. The shore is also lined with eateries where you can grab a bite and drink while soaking in the pristine view. by Stan Zurek Off Makedonias, Santorini Akrotiri "A Lost Minoan World" Akrotiri is a pre-historic settlement that got buried under volcanic ash after the Minoan eruption. Here, the Minoan civilization lives through artifacts as well as everyday items like pottery, oil lamps, and intricately done Frescoes as well as buildings that were all excavated during the early 19th Century and well into the 20th Century. by Rt44 Akrotiri, Santorini Tomato Industrial Museum "A Museum Chronicling Tomato Production" Initially an old D.Nomikos tomato processing factory, the Tomato Industrial Museum is a unique museum that offers a look into the production and processing of tomato, something Santorini is known for. The exhibits such as machines from 1890, first labels, old tools and written accounts provide a glimpse into the old methods followed by the tomato by dafyddbach producers. +30 22860 8 5141 www.santoriniartsfactory. [email protected] Vlychada Beach, Santorini gr/en/museum Arts Factory, Santorini Perissa Beach "Black-Sand Beach" Nestled in the southern region of Santorini, Perissa Beach is one of the beautiful beaches of the island.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 BRITISH SCHOOL at ATHENS 47Th Annual Course For
    1 BRITISH SCHOOL AT ATHENS 47th Annual Course for Undergraduates The Archaeology and Topography of Ancient Greece 18th August – 7th September 2019 PROVISIONAL ITINERARY DATE DAY TIME SITE AUGUST 08.30-23.30 Arrival at the BSA Sunday 18 1 20.00 Informal dinner Monday 19 2 08.00-09.30 Breakfast 09.30-10.15 Introductory Session in Finlay Common Room 10.15-11.00 Library and Archive Tour 11.00-11.30 Coffee Break in Finlay 11.30-13.00 Key Themes I: The history of archaeology and the archaeology of history in Greece (Museum) 13.00-14.00 Buffet Lunch in Dining Room 14.00-15.30 Key Themes II: Ways of approaching archaeological sites (Museum) 15.30-17.00 Key Themes III: Archaeological Science (Fitch) 19.30 BBQ on the Finlay Terrace Tuesday 20 3 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 The Acropolis (including the interior of the Parthenon) (Lunch – self bought) The south Slope of the Acropolis Wednesday 21 4 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 The Athenian Agora and Museum The Areopagos, Philopappos Hill, The Pnyx (Lunch – self bought) The Acropolis Museum Thursday 22 5 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 Kerameikos Library of Hadrian (Lunch – self bought) Roman Agora, Little Metropolis, Arch of Hadrian, Temple of Olympian Zeus Friday 23 6 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 The National Archaeological Museum I (Mycenaean gallery, Pottery collection) (Lunch – self bought) The National Archaeological Museum II (Sculpture collection) Saturday 24 7 08.00-09.00 Breakfast 09.00 Piraeus Museum FREE AFTERNOON Sunday 25 8 FREE DAY 2 Monday 26 9 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 BSA Museum Cycladic
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of the Peloponnesean Populations and the Theory of Extinction of the Medieval Peloponnesean Greeks
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2017) 25, 637–645 Official journal of The European Society of Human Genetics www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Genetics of the peloponnesean populations and the theory of extinction of the medieval peloponnesean Greeks George Stamatoyannopoulos*,1, Aritra Bose2, Athanasios Teodosiadis3, Fotis Tsetsos2, Anna Plantinga4, Nikoletta Psatha5, Nikos Zogas6, Evangelia Yannaki6, Pierre Zalloua7, Kenneth K Kidd8, Brian L Browning4,9, John Stamatoyannopoulos3,10, Peristera Paschou11 and Petros Drineas2 Peloponnese has been one of the cradles of the Classical European civilization and an important contributor to the ancient European history. It has also been the subject of a controversy about the ancestry of its population. In a theory hotly debated by scholars for over 170 years, the German historian Jacob Philipp Fallmerayer proposed that the medieval Peloponneseans were totally extinguished by Slavic and Avar invaders and replaced by Slavic settlers during the 6th century CE. Here we use 2.5 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms to investigate the genetic structure of Peloponnesean populations in a sample of 241 individuals originating from all districts of the peninsula and to examine predictions of the theory of replacement of the medieval Peloponneseans by Slavs. We find considerable heterogeneity of Peloponnesean populations exemplified by genetically distinct subpopulations and by gene flow gradients within Peloponnese. By principal component analysis (PCA) and ADMIXTURE analysis the Peloponneseans are clearly distinguishable from the populations of the Slavic homeland and are very similar to Sicilians and Italians. Using a novel method of quantitative analysis of ADMIXTURE output we find that the Slavic ancestry of Peloponnesean subpopulations ranges from 0.2 to 14.4%.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(S) of an Inland and Mountainous Region
    Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(s) of an Inland and Mountainous Region Eleni Salavoura1 Abstract: The concept of space is an abstract and sometimes a conventional term, but places – where people dwell, (inter)act and gain experiences – contribute decisively to the formation of the main characteristics and the identity of its residents. Arkadia, in the heart of the Peloponnese, is a landlocked country with small valleys and basins surrounded by high mountains, which, according to the ancient literature, offered to its inhabitants a hard and laborious life. Its rough terrain made Arkadia always a less attractive area for archaeological investigation. However, due to its position in the centre of the Peloponnese, Arkadia is an inevitable passage for anyone moving along or across the peninsula. The long life of small and medium-sized agrarian communities undoubtedly owes more to their foundation at crossroads connecting the inland with the Peloponnesian coast, than to their potential for economic growth based on the resources of the land. However, sites such as Analipsis, on its east-southeastern borders, the cemetery at Palaiokastro and the ash altar on Mount Lykaion, both in the southwest part of Arkadia, indicate that the area had a Bronze Age past, and raise many new questions. In this paper, I discuss the role of Arkadia in early Mycenaean times based on settlement patterns and excavation data, and I investigate the relation of these inland communities with high-ranking central places. In other words, this is an attempt to set place(s) into space, supporting the idea that the central region of the Peloponnese was a separated, but not isolated part of it, comprising regions that are also diversified among themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS “Archaeological Tourism in Greece
    UNIVERSITY OF THE PELOPONNESE ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS (R.N. 1012201502004) DIPLOMA THESIS: “Archaeological tourism in Greece: an analysis of quantitative data, determining factors and prospects” SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara EXAMINATION COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikolaos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara - Dr. Nikolaos Platis ΚΑΛΑΜΑΤΑ, MARCH 2017 Abstract . For many decades now, Greece has invested a lot in tourism which can undoubtedly be considered the country’s most valuable asset and “heavy industry”. The country is gifted with a rich and diverse history, represented by a variety of cultural heritage sites which create an ideal setting for this particular type of tourism. Moreover, the variations in Greece’s landscape, cultural tradition and agricultural activity favor the development and promotion of most types of alternative types of tourism, such as agro-tourism, religious, sports and medicinal tourism. However, according to quantitative data from the Hellenic Statistical Authority, despite the large number of visitors recorded in state-run cultural heritage sites every year, the distribution pattern of visitors presents large variations per prefecture. A careful examination of this data shows that tourist flows tend to concentrate in certain prefectures, while others enjoy little to no visitor preference. The main factors behind this phenomenon include the number and importance of cultural heritage sites and the state of local and national infrastructure, which determines the accessibility of sites. An effective analysis of these deficiencies is vital in order to determine solutions in order to encourage the flow of visitors to the more “neglected” areas. The present thesis attempts an in-depth analysis of cultural tourism in Greece and the factors affecting it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Face of Augustus's Aggressive Inclination to Egypt
    Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality Volume 12 - June 2015 - No 1 - Pages: (35 : 56) The Other Face of Augustus’s Aggressive Inclination to Egypt Wahid Omran Lecturer in Tourist Guidance Dep., Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Fayoum University Introduction The initial attitude of Octavian against Egypt is proved by his speech to his troops on the evening before the battle of Actium. Pride in his Roman birth is compared to the despicability of an Egyptian woman as an opponent, who is supported by Dio Cassius reference.1 "Alexandrians and Egyptians- what worse or what truer name could one apply to them?- who worship reptiles and beasts as gods, who embalm their own bodies to give them semblance of immortality, who are most reckless in effrontery but most feeble in courage, and worst of all are slaves to a woman and not to a man". Since The Roman poet Virgile (70- 19 B.C), 2 the Romans opposed the animal – cult of the Egyptians, and considered these gods as monsters.3 The Egyptian character of the Augustus's opponents is related to the Augustan propaganda, represented the Augustus's war against Antony and Cleopatra not only a civil war between Rome and Egypt, but like a struggle between the West and the East. Whose Mark Antony was a traitor joined the powers of the East, whereas Octavian's victory in Actium was not only for himself, but basically for Rome and the Romans. This struggle was described in literature's documents as a civil strife or a foreign war.4 Augustus also knew he had a compensated war against Antony and Cleopatra as a republican magistrate crushing Oriental despotism.5 He is supported by the Roman society ethics and the star of the sacred Caesar, on the other hand, Antony, once a great Roman commander-in-chief, but now supported by a foreign army and followed by unnamed Egyptian spouse.6 The Romans considered the battle not only a military, but either a religious one between the Roman and the Egyptian Pantheons.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Cities & Islands of Asia Minor
    MASTER NEGATIVE NO. 93-81605- Y MICROFILMED 1 993 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES/NEW YORK / as part of the "Foundations of Western Civilization Preservation Project'' Funded by the NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES Reproductions may not be made without permission from Columbia University Library COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The copyright law of the United States - Title 17, United photocopies or States Code - concerns the making of other reproductions of copyrighted material. and Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries or other archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy the reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that for any photocopy or other reproduction is not to be "used purpose other than private study, scholarship, or for, or later uses, a research." If a user makes a request photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of fair infringement. use," that user may be liable for copyright a This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept fulfillment of the order copy order if, in its judgement, would involve violation of the copyright law. AUTHOR: VAUX, WILLIAM SANDYS WRIGHT TITLE: GREEK CITIES ISLANDS OF ASIA MINOR PLACE: LONDON DA TE: 1877 ' Master Negative # COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT BIBLIOGRAPHIC MTCROFORM TAR^FT Original Material as Filmed - Existing Bibliographic Record m^m i» 884.7 !! V46 Vaux, V7aiion Sandys Wright, 1818-1885. ' Ancient history from the monuments. Greek cities I i and islands of Asia Minor, by W. S. W. Vaux... ' ,' London, Society for promoting Christian knowledce." ! 1877. 188. p. plate illus. 17 cm. ^iH2n KJ Restrictions on Use: TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA i? FILM SIZE: 3 S'^y^/"^ REDUCTION IMAGE RATIO: J^/ PLACEMENT: lA UA) iB .
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Metropolis at Athens 15
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2011 The Littleetr M opolis: Religion, Politics, & Spolia Paul Brazinski Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Brazinski, Paul, "The Little eM tropolis: Religion, Politics, & Spolia" (2011). Honors Theses. 12. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/12 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Paul A. Brazinski iv Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge and thank Professor Larson for her patience and thoughtful insight throughout the writing process. She was a tremendous help in editing as well, however, all errors are mine alone. This endeavor could not have been done without you. I would also like to thank Professor Sanders for showing me the fruitful possibilities in the field of Frankish archaeology. I wish to thank Professor Daly for lighting the initial spark for my classical and byzantine interests as well as serving as my archaeological role model. Lastly, I would also like to thank Professor Ulmer, Professor Jones, and all the other Professors who have influenced me and made my stay at Bucknell University one that I will never forget. This thesis is dedicated to my Mom, Dad, Brian, Mark, and yes, even Andrea. Paul A. Brazinski v Table of Contents Abstract viii Introduction 1 History 3 Byzantine Architecture 4 The Little Metropolis at Athens 15 Merbaka 24 Agioi Theodoroi 27 Hagiography: The Saints Theodores 29 Iconography & Cultural Perspectives 35 Conclusions 57 Work Cited 60 Appendix & Figures 65 Paul A.
    [Show full text]