DOCSLIB.ORG

2000 Population and Housing Census of Mongolia: the MAIN RESULTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2000 Population and Housing Census of Mongolia: the MAIN RESULTS 2000 Population and Housing Census of Mongolia: THE MAIN RESULTS NSO National Statistical Office Of Mongolia UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNSD United Nations Statistics Division Contents Page CONTRIBUTORS iii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES IN THE ANNEX xi LIST OF ACRONYMS xiii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xv PREFACE xvii Chapter 1. ORGANIZATION AND CONDUCT OF THE 2000 1 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS 1.1. Population censuses in Mongolia 2 1.2. Planning, administration and organization of the 2 2000 population and housing census 1.3. Training 6 1.4. Mapping and household listing 8 1.5. Advocacy and publicity 9 1.6. Pretesting, enumeration and quality control 11 1.7. Data processing 14 1.8. Dissemination of census data to users 15 1.9. Census concepts, definitions and design of the 17 population questionnaire Chapter 2. POPULATION SIZE, DISTRIBUTION AND 27 DENSITY Chapter 3. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 37 Chapter 4. CITIZENSHIP AND ETHNICITY 47 Chapter 5. INTERNAL MIGRATION AND URBANIZATION 53 Chapter 6. EDUCATION AND LITERACY 69 Chapter 7. ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 79 Chapter 8. HOUSEHOLDS, LIVING QUARTERS AND 95 HOUSING FACILITIES CONCLUSION 109 Annex 1. TABLES OF CENSUS DATA 113 Annex 2. LIST OF CENSUS PRODUCTS 165 Annex 3. CENSUS QUESTIONNAIRE 167 i CONTRIBUTORS Mrs. Davaasuren Chultemjamts, Economist-statistician, Ph. D in Economics (Russia) Master of International Affairs (Columbia University, USA) Chairman of NSO and Deputy of State Census Commission Mr. Batmunkh Batsukh, Economist-statistician, Ph. D in Economics (Moscow Economics and Statistics Institute) Vice-chairman of NSO, Director of the Bureau of Population Census and Survey and Secretary of State Census Commission Mr. Laurence Lewis, Demographer Census Adviser, UNSD/UNFPA Ms. Linda Demers, Demographer Representative in Mongolia, UNFPA Bureau of Population Census and Survey Mrs. Zultsetseg Luvsantseren, Economist-statistician-demographer, Master in Economics (Mongolian National University) Deputy of the Bureau Officers Mr. Gerel Ariya, Mathematician (Mongolian National University) Mr. Badrakh Tsendjav, Economist (Mongolian National University) Mr. Baatarchuluun Chagnaadorj, Labour economist (Labour Institute, Mongolia) Mrs. Munkhtuya Lhagvasuren, Economist, Master in Economics (University of Tashkent, FSU) Mrs. Munkhtsetseg Pooloi, Economist (Technical University Of Mongolia) Ms. Narantsetseg Shaaluu, Economist-demographer (Mongolian National University) Ms. Oyuntsetseg Mashir, Labour economist (Labour Institute, Mongolia) iii Mrs. Tseveennyam Tserendulam, Economist-statistician, Master in Economics (Mongolian National University) Data processing department Mr. Oyunbayar Gombojav, Electronic-engineer (Technical university of Kharikov, FSU) Director of Department Mrs. Tserenkhand Binderya, Programmer and engineer of electro-calculation machine (Technical University, Check Republic) Chief officer Officers Mrs. Erdenesan Eldev-Ochir, Economic-cybernetics (Kazan State University, FSU) Mrs. Nansalmaa Zundui, Programmer (Technical University of Mongolia) Mr. Todgerel Oyuntsetseg Mathematician (Mongolian National University) Training coordinators of MON/97/P10 Ms. Ariunaa Dashtseren Economist-statistician, Master of Science in Demography (London School of Economics and Political Science) Mrs. Baigalmaa Baatar English language teacher and translator, Post graduate diploma in information and technology (University of Auckland, NZ) iv LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Page Table 1.1. List of census products 17 Table 1.2. Concepts and definitions used for the census, 2000 20 Table 1.3. Variations in topics and questions on individual forms, 24 1989 and 2000 Table 2.1. Population enumerated in Mongolian censuses, 1918- 28 2000 Table 2.2. Urban and rural population by aimag and the Capital, 32 2000 Table 2.3. Urban and rural population by region, 2000 33 Table 2.4. Population density by region, 2000 33 Table 2.5. Population and population densities of aimag and the 35 Capital, 1989 and 2000 Table 3.1. Inter-censal population growth of aimag and the 39 Capital, 1979-1989 and 1989-2000 Table 3.2. Age and sex distribution of the population and sex 41 ratio, 2000, in thousands Table 3.3. Age group distribution, percentage, 1979, 1989 and 42 2000 Table 3.4. Population aged 15 and above by marital status, 1979, 43 1989 and 2000 Table 3.5. Marital status by sex, 2000 43 Table 3.6. Singulate mean age at first marriage by sex, 1989 and 44 2000 Table 3.7. Marital status by age group and sex, 2000, in thousand 47 Table 4.1. Foreign citizens by country of citizenship, 1989 and 48 2000 Table 4.2. Foreign citizens by aimag and the Capital, 2000 49 Table 4.3. Percent distribution of foreign citizens and total 49 population by age group and sex, 2000 Table 4.4. Mongolian citizens by ethnic group, 1989 and 2000 50 v Table 4.5. Percent distribution of population by ethnic group and 52 age group, 2000 Table 5.1. Schematic representation of number of migrants using 56 various time and space perspectives, 2000 Table 5.2. Lifetime migrants by region, 2000 57 Table 5.3. Number of population by place of birth and residence 58 at the time of the census, 2000 Table 5.4. Percent distribution of population by place of birth and 59 by place of residence at the time of the census, 2000 Table 5.5. Five-year migrants by region, 2000 60 Table 5.6. Number of population aged 5 and above by place of 60 residence in January, 1995 and by place of residence at the time of the census, 2000 Table 5.7. Percent distribution of population aged 5 and above by 61 place of residence at January, 1995 and by place of residence at the time of the census, 2000 Table 5.8. Mean annual migration rates, January 1995 to January 62 2000 Table 5.9. One-year migrants by region, 2000 63 Table 5.10. Number of population by place of residence in the past 64 year and place of residence at the time of the census, 2000 Table 5.11. Percent distribution of population by place of 64 residence in the past year and place of residence at the time of the census, 2000 Table 5.12. Number and percentage distribution of migrants in past 65 year by age group and sex, 2000 Table 6.1. Percent distribution of population aged 10 and above 70 by the highest level of education completed and by sex, 1989 and 2000 Table 6.2. Percent distribution of population aged 10 and above 71 by highest level of education completed and by residence and sex, 2000 Table 6.3. Percent distribution of population aged 10 and above 72 by highest level of education completed and age group, 2000 vi Table 6.4. Number and percent distribution of population aged 74 15 and above, by literacy status, residence and sex, 2000 Table 6.5. School attendance of 7-29 year olds by age and sex, 76 2000 Table 6.6. Percentage of 7-29 year olds attending an educational 77 institution by age group, residence and sex, 2000 Table 7.1. Percent distribution of population by economic activity 82 status, by sex and residence, 2000 Table 7.2. Number and percent distribution of population by age 82 group, economic activity status and sex, 2000 Table 7.3. Number and percent of employed population aged 15 85 and above by sex and residence, 2000 Table 7.4. Number and percent distribution of employed 85 population aged 15 and above by age group and sex, 2000 Table 7.5. Number and percent distribution of employed 86 population aged 15 and above by occupation and sex, 2000 Table 7.6. Number and percent distribution of employed 87 population aged 15 and above by industry and sex, 2000 Table 7.7. Number (ë000) of employed population by status in 88 employment and sex, 2000 Table 7.8. Unemployed population by residence and sex, 2000 90 Table 7.9. Unemployment rates by age group, residence and sex, 91 2000 Table 7.10. Number and percent distribution of economically 92 inactive population aged 15 and above, by reasons for not working and sex, 2000 Table 7.11. Number (ë000) of economically inactive population 93 aged 15 and above by age group and reason for not working, 2000 Table 7.12. Number (ë000) of persons not working or looking for 93 work as no work available, 2000 vii Table 7.13. Broadened concepts of the labour force and 94 unemployment, 2000 Table 8.1. Number and percent distribution of households by 96 residence, 1989 and 2000 Table 8.2. Number and percent distribution of households by 97 residence and type, 2000 Table 8.3. Number and percent distribution of households by 98 residence and size, 2000 Table 8.4. Percent distribution of households, by size, aimag and 98 the Capital, 2000 Table 8.5. Number and percent distribution of households by sex 99 of head and residence, 2000 Table 8.6. Number and percent distribution of households by 100 residence, 2000 Table 8.7. Number and percent distribution of households by 100 type of living quarters, 2000 Table 8.8. Percent distribution of households by type of living 101 quarters and residence, 2000 Table 8.9. Number and percent distribution of households by 102 type of living quarters and ownership, 2000 Table 8.10. Number and percent distribution of households by 102 type of ownership and residence, 2000 Table 8.11. Number and percent of households with electricity 103 supply and telephone, by residence, 2000 Table 8.12. Number and percent distribution of households living 103 in ger by household size and number of walls, 2000 Table 8.13. Percent of households in gers by facilities available 104 and residence, 2000 Table 8.14. Number and percent distribution of households in 105 conventional living quarters by household size and living area, 2000 Table 8.15. Percent distribution of households in conventional 106 living quarters by household size and number of rooms, 2000 viii Table 8.16.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033
    Globalization ’s Impact on Mongolian Identity Issues and the Image of Chinggis Khan Alicia J. Campi PART I: The Mongols, this previously unheard-of nation that unexpectedly emerged to terrorize the whole world for two hundred years, disappeared again into obscurity with the advent of firearms. Even so, the name Mongol became one forever familiar to humankind, and the entire stretch of the thirteenth through the fifteenth centuries has come to be known as the Mongol era.' PART II; The historic science was the science, which has been badly affect­ ed, and the people of Mongolia bid farewell to their history and learned by heart the bistort' with distortion but fuU of ideolog}'. Because of this, the Mong ­ olians started to forget their religious rituals, customs and traditions and the pa­ triotic feelings of Mongolians turned to the side of perishing as the internation ­ alism was put above aU.^ PART III: For decades, Mongolia had subordinated national identity to So­ viet priorities __Now, they were set adrift in a sea of uncertainty, and Mongol ­ ians were determined to define themselves as a nation and as a people. The new freedom was an opportunity as well as a crisis." As the three above quotations indicate, identity issues for the Mongolian peoples have always been complicated. In our increas­ ingly interconnected, media-driven world culture, nations with Baabar, Histoij of Mongolia (Ulaanbaatar: Monsudar Publishing, 1999), 4. 2 “The Political Report of the First Congress of the Mongolian Social-Demo ­ cratic Party” (March 31, 1990), 14. " Tsedendamdyn Batbayar, Mongolia’s Foreign Folicy in the 1990s: New Identity and New Challenges (Ulaanbaatar: Institute for Strategic Studies, 2002), 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Faces of Mongolian Fear: Demonological Beliefs, Narratives and Protective Measures in Contemporary Folk Religion*
    Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics 14 (1): 49–64 DOI: 10.2478/jef-2020-0004 FACES OF MONGOLIAN FEAR: DEMONOLOGICAL BELIEFS, NARRATIVES AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN CONTEMPORARY FOLK RELIGION* ALEVTINA SOLOVYEVA Junior Research Fellow Department for Estonian and Comparative Folklore University of Tartu Ülikooli 18, 50090 Tartu, Estonia Leading Research Fellow Institute for Oriental and Classical Studies National Research University Higher School of Economics Myasnitskaja 20, 101000 Moscow, Russia e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article looks at the perceptions of fear and ‘the frightening’ in contemporary Mongolian demonology. In the article, I discuss beliefs concerning both human and supernatural – what is supposed to be frightening for humans and what is supposed to be frightening for spirits, ghosts and demons. In daily interaction with the supernatural this mutual ‘fright’ can be regarded as an important part of communication. In this article, I discuss what is believed to be the most frightful for humans and for supernatural agents, what kinds of image this fear relates to and what the roots of these beliefs are, as well as the popular ways to confront and defend against ‘frightening’ in Mongolian folklore. My research is based on fieldwork materials collected during annual expedi- tions in different parts of Mongolia (2006–2017) and Mongolian published sources such as Mongolian newspapers and journals, special editions of stories about encounters with the supernatural. KEYWORDS: Mongolian folklore • narratives • rites • fears • socialist past and contemporary period. * This article is a continuation of my paper, presented at the Anthropology of Fright: Per- spectives from Asia international conference (Aarhus University, May 18–19, 2017), inspired and developed with the support of event organisers Stefano Beggiora (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy), Lidia Guzy (University College Cork, Ireland), Uwe Skoda (Aarhus University, Denmark).
    [Show full text]
  • Mongolia 1989 Census Coder
    Population and Housing Census 1989 THE INSTRUCTION FOR CODING OF POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF MONGOLIA One. GENERAL PROVISION This instruction shall be used to process data collected by census questionnaire, household sheet, survey on unemployed ones with working ability in working age and survey on females. The instruction consists of 3 sections and annexes. Namely, Section I. Instruction to code indicators of census questionnaire Section II. Instruction to code indicators of household sheet Section III. Instruction to code indicators of unemployed ones with working ability in working age and survey on females Annexes: - Annex No1. The classification of administrative units - Annex No 2. The lists of cities and villages - Annex No 3. The codes for ethnic groups - Annex No 4. The codes for countries - Annex No 5. The classification of national economy - Annex No 6. The classification list of employment - Annex No 7. The classification list of occupation - Annex No 8. Lists of sources of living - Annex No 9. Relationship to the household head If coders have any unclear or disputable things, they shall be informed to the section of population census and solved them immediately. Section I Instruction to code indicators of census questionnaire 1. The indicators of census questionnaire, which to be coded and checked Name of the indicators Number of To be coded – C To Annex to be digits be checked - Ch used 1. Aimags and cities 1 C 1 2. Whether they obtained registration 1 Ch number or not 3. Address /urban, rural/ 1 Ch 1, 2 4. Cities and villages /soum and khoroo/ 1 C 2 5.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESENT SITUATION of KAZAKH-MONGOLIAN COMMUNITY Ts.Baatar, Ph.D
    The Mongolian Journal of International Affairs Number 8-9, 2002 PRESENT SITUATION OF KAZAKH-MONGOLIAN COMMUNITY Ts.Baatar, Ph.D (Mongolia) The name and identity “kazakh” emerged in the sixteenth century, when a Kazakh Khanate was founded in today’s Kazakhstan. The Kazakh aristocrats trace their origin directly to Chinggis Khan or his sons. In the sixteenth century, ethnic Kazakhs were historically divided into three clans or zhuzes: The senior zhuz, the middle zhuz, and the junior zhuz. Once under the rule of the Oirad Mongols in the seventeenth to eighteen centuries, some middle zhuz Kazakhs later moved into Jungaria. The Kazakhs in Mongolia are mostly Abak-kerei and Naiman Kazakhs who settled in the Altai and Khovd regions, where they rented pasture from the lords of Mongolia during the 1860s according to Tarbagatai Protokol between Russia and Qing Dynasty. The nomads came to graze their sheep on the high mountain pastures during the summer, and spent the winter in Kazakhstan or Xinjiang province in China. After the Mongolian revolution in 1921, a permanent border was drawn by agreement between China, Russia and Mongolia, but the Kazakhs remained nomadic until the 1930s, crossing the border at their own will.1 The word kazakh is said to mean ‘free warrior’ or ‘steppe roamer’. Kazakhs trace their roots to the fifteenth century, when rebellious kinsmen of an Uzbek Khan broke away and settled in present-day Kazakhstan. In Mongolia, more than in Kazakhstan, Kazakh women wear long dresses with stand-up collars, or brightly decorated velvet waistcoats and heavy jewelry. The men still wear baggy shirts and trousers, sleeveless jackets, wool or cotton robes, and a skullcap or a high, tasseled felt hat.2 In 1923 the Mongolian Kazakh population numbered 1,870 households and 11,220 people.3 Subsequently, many more have come to Mongolia from 3 Paul Greenway, Robert Story and Gobriel Lafitte (1997), Mongolia (Lonely Planet Publications), p.231.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Dryland Sustainable Landscapes and Biodiversity Conservation in the Eastern Steppe of Mongolia” Project
    Environmental and Social Management Framework for “Promoting Dryland Sustainable Landscapes and Biodiversity Conservation in The Eastern Steppe of Mongolia” Project ULAANBAATAR 2020 Required citation: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), World Wildlife Fund (WWF). 2020. Environmental and Social Management Framework for “Promoting Dryland Sustainable Landscapes and Biodiversity Conservation in The Eastern Steppe of Mongolia” Project. Ulaanbaatar. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, WWF, 2020 Some rights reserved. This worK is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAliKe 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this worK may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this worK, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services.
    [Show full text]
  • Mongolica Pragensia ’16 9/2
    Mongolica Pragensia ’16 9/2 Mongolica Pragensia ’16 Ethnolinguistics, Sociolinguistics, Religion and Culture Volume 9, No. 2 Publication of Charles University Faculty of Arts, Department of South and Central Asia Seminar of Mongolian and Tibetan Studies Prague 2016 ISSN 1803–5647 This journal is published as a part of the Programme for the Development of Fields of Study at Charles University, Oriental Studies, sub-programme “The process of transformation in the language and cultural differentness of the countries of South and Central Asia”, a project of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University. The publication of this Issue was supported by the TRITON Publishing House. Mongolica Pragensia ’16 Linguistics, Ethnolinguistics, Religion and Culture Volume 9, No. 2 (2016) © Editors Editors-in-chief: Veronika Kapišovská and Veronika Zikmundová Editorial Board: Daniel Berounský (Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic) Agata Bareja-Starzyńska (University of Warsaw, Poland) Katia Buffetrille (École pratique des Hautes-Études, Paris, France) J. Lubsangdorji (Charles University Prague, Czech Republic) Marie-Dominique Even (Centre National des Recherches Scientifiques, Paris, France) Veronika Kapišovská (Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic) Marek Mejor (University of Warsaw, Poland) Tsevel Shagdarsurung (National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia) Domiin Tömörtogoo (National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia) Veronika Zikmundová (Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic) English correction: Dr. Mark Corner (HUB University, Brussels) Department of South and Central Asia, Seminar of Mongolian and Tibetan Studies Faculty of Arts, Charles University Celetná 20, 116 42 Praha 1, Czech Republic http://mongolistika.ff.cuni.cz Publisher: Stanislav Juhaňák – TRITON http://www.triton-books.cz Vykáňská 5, 100 00 Praha 10 IČ 18433499 Praha (Prague) 2016 Cover Renata Brtnická Typeset Studio Marvil Printed by Art D – Grafický ateliér Černý s.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Appendices Here
    APPENDIX A: EFFECTIVE NUMBER OF PARTIES BY COUNTRY AND YEAR The effec've number of par'es equals the reciprocal of the sum of the squared propor'on of the vote received by each party with independent candidates each treated as separate par'es. Effective Number Country Year of Electoral Parties Antigua and Barbuda 1994 2.05 Antigua and Barbuda 1999 2.09 Antigua and Barbuda 2004 2.07 Antigua and Barbuda 2009 2.07 Argentina 1991 3.98 Argentina 1993 3.57 Argentina 1995 3.61 Argentina 1997 3.65 Argentina 1999 3.28 Argentina 2001 6.08 Argentina 2003 5.39 Argentina 2005 6.38 Australia 1990 3.37 Australia 1993 2.90 Australia 1996 3.20 Australia 1998 3.46 Australia 2001 3.43 Australia 2004 3.18 Australia 2007 3.03 Australia 2010 3.83 Austria 1990 3.16 Austria 1994 3.87 Austria 1995 3.59 Austria 1999 3.82 Austria 2002 3.02 Austria 2006 3.71 Austria 2008 4.83 Bahamas 1992 1.98 Bahamas 1997 1.97 Bahamas 2002 2.28 Bahamas 2007 2.13 Barbados 1991 2.28 Barbados 1994 2.52 Barbados 1999 1.84 Barbados 2003 1.98 Effective Number Country Year of Electoral Parties Barbados 2008 2.00 Belgium 1991 9.81 Belgium 1995 9.46 Belgium 1999 10.27 Belgium 2003 8.84 Belgium 2007 9.04 Belgium 2010 10.04 Belize 1993 2.00 Belize 1998 1.96 Belize 2003 2.04 Belize 2008 2.03 Botswana 1994 2.34 Botswana 1999 2.44 Botswana 2004 2.74 Botswana 2009 2.71 Brazil 1990 9.80 Brazil 1994 8.52 Brazil 1998 8.14 Brazil 2002 9.28 Brazil 2006 10.62 Brazil 2010 11.21 Bulgaria 1991 4.18 Bulgaria 1994 3.85 Bulgaria 1997 3.00 Bulgaria 2001 3.94 Bulgaria 2005 5.80 Bulgaria 2009 4.40 Canada 1993
    [Show full text]
  • Y-Chromosomal Analysis of Clan Structure of Kalmyks, the Only European Mongol People, and Their Relationship to Oirat-Mongols of Inner Asia
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2019) 27:1466–1474 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0399-0 ARTICLE Y-chromosomal analysis of clan structure of Kalmyks, the only European Mongol people, and their relationship to Oirat-Mongols of Inner Asia 1 2,3 2 2 2 Natalia Balinova ● Helen Post ● Alena Kushniarevich ● Rodrigo Flores ● Monika Karmin ● 2,4 2 2 5 6 Hovhannes Sahakyan ● Maere Reidla ● Ene Metspalu ● Sergey Litvinov ● Murat Dzhaubermezov ● 5 5,6 2,7 5 8 9 Vita Akhmetova ● Rita Khusainova ● Phillip Endicott ● Elza Khusnutdinova ● Keemya Orlova ● Elza Bakaeva ● 10 11 1 2,3 2 Irina Khomyakova ● Nailya Spitsina ● Rena Zinchenko ● Richard Villems ● Siiri Rootsi Received: 2 October 2018 / Revised: 8 March 2019 / Accepted: 26 March 2019 / Published online: 11 April 2019 © The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access Abstract Kalmyks, the only Mongolic-speaking population in Europe, live in the southeast of the European Plain, in Russia. They adhere to Buddhism and speak a dialect of the Mongolian language. Historical and linguistic evidence, as well a shared clan names, suggests a common origin with Oirats of western Mongolia; yet, only a limited number of genetic studies have focused on this 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: topic. Here we compare the paternal genetic relationship of Kalmyk clans with ethnographically related groups from Mongolia, Kyrgyzstan and China, within the context of their neighbouring populations. A phylogeny of 37 high-coverage Y-chromosome sequences, together with further genotyping of larger sample sets, reveals that all the Oirat-speaking populations studied here, including Kalmyks, share, as a dominant paternal lineage, Y-chromosomal haplogroup C3c1-M77, which is also present in several geographically distant native Siberian populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Intangible Cultural Heritage of Mongolian
    1 Editor of the Issue Contents Shen Ce CRIHAP Feature 4 The 9th Session of the Governing Board of CRIHAP Kicks Off in Beijing 4 CRIHAP's 7th Session of the Advisory Committee Held in Beijing 7 Global Updates 8 Observation of Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage Worldwide in the COVID-19 Pandemic 8 - Practice Expression of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Times of Crisis Workshop Reviews 12 Summary and Review: Capacity Building Workshop on the Role of Media for the Implementation of the Convention 12 Fieldwork Reports 20 The Role of Journalists in the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage 28 Involvement of Mongolian National Broadcaster in the Documentation of Cultural Heritage 34 Intangible Cultural Heritage of Mongolian 36 My Impression on the Training Workshop 45 A Bridge Connecting Intangible Cultural Heritage and the Public 46 - A Sidelight on the First CRIHAP Capacity Building Workshop on the Implementation of the Convention for Media Practitioners CRIHAP Updates 48 CRIHAP Launches the Workshop on "Linking the 2003 Convention and University ICH Programs" Online 48 Fourth Training of Trainers Workshop for Central Asia Takes Place Online 49 Copyrights of all the photos published in this newsletter are held by CRIHAP 2 3 practitioners from southern Vietnam. As UNESCO had previously provided ICH capacity building workshops for trainees from northern and central Vietnam, this workshop boosted Vietnam's overall ICH safeguarding capacity. The workshop in Bangladesh started preparations nine months before its opening. A more reasonable training program was made based on studying the overall state of ICH safeguarding in Bangladesh and sorting out and summarizing previous workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Environmental Examination (DRAFT)
    Ensuring Inclusiveness and Service Delivery for Persons with Disabilities (RRP MON 48076) Initial Environmental Examination (DRAFT) November 2017 MONGOLIA: Ensuring Inclusiveness and Service Delivery for Persons with Disabilities Project Prepared by the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 17 October 2017) Currency unit – togrog (MNT) MNT1.00 = $0.0004 $1.00 = MNT 2,459.50 ABBREVIATIONS ACM – asbestos-containing material ADB – Asian Development Bank ASI – agency for specialized inspection CWD – child with disabilities DEIA – detailed environmental impact assessment DPO – disabled people’s organization EA – executing agency EEE – external environmental expert EIA – environmental impact assessment EMP – environment management plan ES – environmental specialist GASI – general agency for specialized inspection GEIA – general environmental impact assessment GIC – grant implementation consultant GoM – Government of Mongolia GRM – grievance redress mechanism IEE – initial environmental examination IEM – independent environment monitor IFC – International Finance Corporation HSMP – Health and Safety Management Plan LEED – United States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design MECS – Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Sports MEGD – Ministry of Environment and Green Development MLSP – Ministry of Labor and Social Protection MNS – Mongolian national standards MOH – Ministry of Health NGO – nongovernmental organization PCU – project complaint unit PIU – project implementation unit PSC – project steering committee PWD – person with disabilities TA – technical assistance UB – Ulaanbaatar WEIGHTS AND MEASURES °C – degree Celsius dB – decibel km – kilometer kWh – kilowatt hour m – meter GLOSSARY aimag – province soum – aimag subdistrict khoroo – Ulaanbaatar subdistrict NOTES In the report, “$” refers to US dollars. This initial environment examination is a document of the borrower.
    [Show full text]
  • EMIS Mongolia.Pdf
    © UNICEF/UN0321665/Matas REVIEW OF EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (EMIS) THAT TRACK INDIVIDUAL STUDENT DATA MONGOLIA July 2020 2 Review of EMIS that track individual student data: Mongolia Acknowledgements Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Sports The Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Sports The school level is where equitable access and the (MECSS) has shown a great interest in this research, quality of education service delivery must be measured. illustrated by the willingness of many staff to be So, it has been exceptionally meaningful to listen to interviewed and to provide open responses. There is the experiences of staff working at school or soum growing awareness amongst the interviewed MECSS level. These staff should continue to inform the staff of the potential of using more and better-quality development of EMIS, so that the system becomes data for decision-making. This was not only evident relevant not only at macro-level, but also to individual during interviews and small-group discussions, it was schools. also illustrated by the Vice-Minister who opened the validation workshop, emphasizing the importance of Lastly, a word of thanks goes out to the MECSS staff availability of reliable data to move the education sector and education stakeholders who were interviewed or forward. participated in the validation workshop. It was positive to observe how staff from the MECSS and other The time-availability and the openness of Director- organizations worked together in small groups, providing Generals, National Directors and other staff were valuable feedback to complete the findings and shape instrumental to inform the analyses and formulation the recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mongolia: Gender-Responsive Sector and Local Development Policies
    Project Number: 50093-001 TA Number: 9201 May 2019 Mongolia: Gender-Responsive Sector and Local Development Policies and Actions This report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and neither the ADB nor the Government shall be held liable for its contents. © 2019 Government of Mongolia National committee on Gender Equality Mongolia Gender Situational Analysis: Advances, Challenges and Lessons Learnt Since 2005 report is written by: The gender consulting team under the “gender-responsive sector and local development policies and actions” technical assistance: International consultant: Ms. Jaime Shabalina National consultants: Ms. Amgalan Terbish Ms. Oyuntsetseg Oidov Ms. Onon Byambasuren Ms. Enkhjargal Davaasuren Ms. Undrakh Tsagaankhuu Mr. Jargalsaikhan Jambalsanjid Ms. Tsetsgee Ser-Od Ms. Enebish Tulgaa Project coordinator: Ms. Altantsooj Bazarvaani Reviewed by: Ms. Sukhjargalmaa Dugersuren Gender Advisor to the Prime Minister of Mongolia Secretariat of the National Committee on Gender Equality: Ms. Enkhbayar Tumur-Ulzii, Secretary of the national committee on Gender Equality, Head of the Secretariat of the National Committee on Gender Equality Ms. Battsetseg Sukhbaatar, Senior specialist, policy planning and budgeting Ms. Buyanaa Ochirkhuu, Specialist, Inter-sectoral coordination and Human resource National Statistical Ofice: Mr. Amarbal Avirmed, Director, Population and Social Statistics Department (PSSD) Mr. Bilguun Enkhbayar, Statistician, PSSD Asian Development Bank: Declan F. Magee, Deputy Country
    [Show full text]