Mongolia: Gender-Responsive Sector and Local Development Policies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2000 Population and Housing Census of Mongolia: the MAIN RESULTS
2000 Population and Housing Census of Mongolia: THE MAIN RESULTS NSO National Statistical Office Of Mongolia UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNSD United Nations Statistics Division Contents Page CONTRIBUTORS iii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES IN THE ANNEX xi LIST OF ACRONYMS xiii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xv PREFACE xvii Chapter 1. ORGANIZATION AND CONDUCT OF THE 2000 1 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS 1.1. Population censuses in Mongolia 2 1.2. Planning, administration and organization of the 2 2000 population and housing census 1.3. Training 6 1.4. Mapping and household listing 8 1.5. Advocacy and publicity 9 1.6. Pretesting, enumeration and quality control 11 1.7. Data processing 14 1.8. Dissemination of census data to users 15 1.9. Census concepts, definitions and design of the 17 population questionnaire Chapter 2. POPULATION SIZE, DISTRIBUTION AND 27 DENSITY Chapter 3. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 37 Chapter 4. CITIZENSHIP AND ETHNICITY 47 Chapter 5. INTERNAL MIGRATION AND URBANIZATION 53 Chapter 6. EDUCATION AND LITERACY 69 Chapter 7. ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 79 Chapter 8. HOUSEHOLDS, LIVING QUARTERS AND 95 HOUSING FACILITIES CONCLUSION 109 Annex 1. TABLES OF CENSUS DATA 113 Annex 2. LIST OF CENSUS PRODUCTS 165 Annex 3. CENSUS QUESTIONNAIRE 167 i CONTRIBUTORS Mrs. Davaasuren Chultemjamts, Economist-statistician, Ph. D in Economics (Russia) Master of International Affairs (Columbia University, USA) Chairman of NSO and Deputy of State Census Commission Mr. Batmunkh Batsukh, Economist-statistician, Ph. D in Economics (Moscow Economics and Statistics Institute) Vice-chairman of NSO, Director of the Bureau of Population Census and Survey and Secretary of State Census Commission Mr. -
The Association Between Breastfeeding Practices in Mongolia and Geographical Location of the Mother and Child
The Association Between Breastfeeding Practices in Mongolia and Geographical Location of the Mother and Child Isabel Dickson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Public Health University of Washington 2012 Committee: Marcia Williams Clarence Spigner Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Public Health - Health Services University of Washington Abstract The Association Between Breastfeeding Practices in Mongolia and Geographical Location of the Mother and Child Isabel Dickson Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Senior Lecturer Marcia Williams Department of Epidemiology Background A large body of research has shown that breastfeeding is optimal for infants and mothers. Previously high rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Mongolia have declined in recent years. Increased urban migration may be a factor in breastfeeding practices in rural compared to urban settings. Methods This cross-sectional study analyzed a subset of infants aged 6-23 months from the 3rd National Nutrition Survey in Mongolia to compare breastfeeding practices in urban and rural areas including exclusive breastfeeding for at least 6 months and duration of breastfeeding. Analysis Logistic regression was used to compare likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding for at least 6 months between rural and urban subjects. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios between rural and urban subjects for likelihood of weaning. Results Of 495 infants who were aged 6-23 months at time of survey, 202 (41%) were 6-11 months, and 293 (59%) were 11-23 months of age. In this sample, 309 (62%) of the subjects were categorized as rural residence, while 186 (38%) were categorized as urban. -
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
United Nations CEDAW/C/MNG/8-9 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 3 December 2014 against Women Original: English Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the Convention Eighth and ninth periodic reports of States parties due in 2014 Mongolia* [Date received: 5 November 2014] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. 14-66067 (E) 050115 *1466067* CEDAW/C/MNG/8-9 Contents Page Introduction ................................................................... 3 i. Explication on the combined eighth and ninth periodic report of the Government of Mongolia on the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women ................................... 3 ii. General Introduction on Mongolia ........................................ 3 Part One ...................................................................... 5 1.1 Laws, regulations and legislative measures intended to eliminate discrimination on grounds of gender (Article 2 and 3) ....................................... 5 1.2 Actions on breaking down the prevailing stereotype patterns on the responsibilities of women and men (Article 5) ............................................ 9 1.3 Actions to prevent and eliminate all forms of trafficking in women and children and exploitation of women in prostitution (Article 6) ......................... 10 Part Two .................................................................... -
Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033
Globalization ’s Impact on Mongolian Identity Issues and the Image of Chinggis Khan Alicia J. Campi PART I: The Mongols, this previously unheard-of nation that unexpectedly emerged to terrorize the whole world for two hundred years, disappeared again into obscurity with the advent of firearms. Even so, the name Mongol became one forever familiar to humankind, and the entire stretch of the thirteenth through the fifteenth centuries has come to be known as the Mongol era.' PART II; The historic science was the science, which has been badly affect ed, and the people of Mongolia bid farewell to their history and learned by heart the bistort' with distortion but fuU of ideolog}'. Because of this, the Mong olians started to forget their religious rituals, customs and traditions and the pa triotic feelings of Mongolians turned to the side of perishing as the internation alism was put above aU.^ PART III: For decades, Mongolia had subordinated national identity to So viet priorities __Now, they were set adrift in a sea of uncertainty, and Mongol ians were determined to define themselves as a nation and as a people. The new freedom was an opportunity as well as a crisis." As the three above quotations indicate, identity issues for the Mongolian peoples have always been complicated. In our increas ingly interconnected, media-driven world culture, nations with Baabar, Histoij of Mongolia (Ulaanbaatar: Monsudar Publishing, 1999), 4. 2 “The Political Report of the First Congress of the Mongolian Social-Demo cratic Party” (March 31, 1990), 14. " Tsedendamdyn Batbayar, Mongolia’s Foreign Folicy in the 1990s: New Identity and New Challenges (Ulaanbaatar: Institute for Strategic Studies, 2002), 8. -
Faces of Mongolian Fear: Demonological Beliefs, Narratives and Protective Measures in Contemporary Folk Religion*
Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics 14 (1): 49–64 DOI: 10.2478/jef-2020-0004 FACES OF MONGOLIAN FEAR: DEMONOLOGICAL BELIEFS, NARRATIVES AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN CONTEMPORARY FOLK RELIGION* ALEVTINA SOLOVYEVA Junior Research Fellow Department for Estonian and Comparative Folklore University of Tartu Ülikooli 18, 50090 Tartu, Estonia Leading Research Fellow Institute for Oriental and Classical Studies National Research University Higher School of Economics Myasnitskaja 20, 101000 Moscow, Russia e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article looks at the perceptions of fear and ‘the frightening’ in contemporary Mongolian demonology. In the article, I discuss beliefs concerning both human and supernatural – what is supposed to be frightening for humans and what is supposed to be frightening for spirits, ghosts and demons. In daily interaction with the supernatural this mutual ‘fright’ can be regarded as an important part of communication. In this article, I discuss what is believed to be the most frightful for humans and for supernatural agents, what kinds of image this fear relates to and what the roots of these beliefs are, as well as the popular ways to confront and defend against ‘frightening’ in Mongolian folklore. My research is based on fieldwork materials collected during annual expedi- tions in different parts of Mongolia (2006–2017) and Mongolian published sources such as Mongolian newspapers and journals, special editions of stories about encounters with the supernatural. KEYWORDS: Mongolian folklore • narratives • rites • fears • socialist past and contemporary period. * This article is a continuation of my paper, presented at the Anthropology of Fright: Per- spectives from Asia international conference (Aarhus University, May 18–19, 2017), inspired and developed with the support of event organisers Stefano Beggiora (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy), Lidia Guzy (University College Cork, Ireland), Uwe Skoda (Aarhus University, Denmark). -
Mongolia 1989 Census Coder
Population and Housing Census 1989 THE INSTRUCTION FOR CODING OF POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF MONGOLIA One. GENERAL PROVISION This instruction shall be used to process data collected by census questionnaire, household sheet, survey on unemployed ones with working ability in working age and survey on females. The instruction consists of 3 sections and annexes. Namely, Section I. Instruction to code indicators of census questionnaire Section II. Instruction to code indicators of household sheet Section III. Instruction to code indicators of unemployed ones with working ability in working age and survey on females Annexes: - Annex No1. The classification of administrative units - Annex No 2. The lists of cities and villages - Annex No 3. The codes for ethnic groups - Annex No 4. The codes for countries - Annex No 5. The classification of national economy - Annex No 6. The classification list of employment - Annex No 7. The classification list of occupation - Annex No 8. Lists of sources of living - Annex No 9. Relationship to the household head If coders have any unclear or disputable things, they shall be informed to the section of population census and solved them immediately. Section I Instruction to code indicators of census questionnaire 1. The indicators of census questionnaire, which to be coded and checked Name of the indicators Number of To be coded – C To Annex to be digits be checked - Ch used 1. Aimags and cities 1 C 1 2. Whether they obtained registration 1 Ch number or not 3. Address /urban, rural/ 1 Ch 1, 2 4. Cities and villages /soum and khoroo/ 1 C 2 5. -
PRESENT SITUATION of KAZAKH-MONGOLIAN COMMUNITY Ts.Baatar, Ph.D
The Mongolian Journal of International Affairs Number 8-9, 2002 PRESENT SITUATION OF KAZAKH-MONGOLIAN COMMUNITY Ts.Baatar, Ph.D (Mongolia) The name and identity “kazakh” emerged in the sixteenth century, when a Kazakh Khanate was founded in today’s Kazakhstan. The Kazakh aristocrats trace their origin directly to Chinggis Khan or his sons. In the sixteenth century, ethnic Kazakhs were historically divided into three clans or zhuzes: The senior zhuz, the middle zhuz, and the junior zhuz. Once under the rule of the Oirad Mongols in the seventeenth to eighteen centuries, some middle zhuz Kazakhs later moved into Jungaria. The Kazakhs in Mongolia are mostly Abak-kerei and Naiman Kazakhs who settled in the Altai and Khovd regions, where they rented pasture from the lords of Mongolia during the 1860s according to Tarbagatai Protokol between Russia and Qing Dynasty. The nomads came to graze their sheep on the high mountain pastures during the summer, and spent the winter in Kazakhstan or Xinjiang province in China. After the Mongolian revolution in 1921, a permanent border was drawn by agreement between China, Russia and Mongolia, but the Kazakhs remained nomadic until the 1930s, crossing the border at their own will.1 The word kazakh is said to mean ‘free warrior’ or ‘steppe roamer’. Kazakhs trace their roots to the fifteenth century, when rebellious kinsmen of an Uzbek Khan broke away and settled in present-day Kazakhstan. In Mongolia, more than in Kazakhstan, Kazakh women wear long dresses with stand-up collars, or brightly decorated velvet waistcoats and heavy jewelry. The men still wear baggy shirts and trousers, sleeveless jackets, wool or cotton robes, and a skullcap or a high, tasseled felt hat.2 In 1923 the Mongolian Kazakh population numbered 1,870 households and 11,220 people.3 Subsequently, many more have come to Mongolia from 3 Paul Greenway, Robert Story and Gobriel Lafitte (1997), Mongolia (Lonely Planet Publications), p.231. -
Tribal Values and Norms in Mongolia and Their Effect on Women's Status
Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2015, 3, 120-126 Published Online May 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jss http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2015.35017 Tribal Values and Norms in Mongolia and Their Effect on Women’s Status Shaul M. Gabbay Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, Denver, USA Email: [email protected] Received 5 March 2015; accepted 23 May 2015; published 26 May 2015 Copyright © 2015 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Roughly the size of Alaska, Mongolia is a landlocked country between Russia on its northern fron- tier and China on its southern border. With just over three million inhabitants, it is sparsely po- pulated, with nearly half of the people living in the capital city of Ulaanbaatar, and in other pro- vincial centers. The tribal networks in Mongolia are the main tenants of social structural charac- teristics in the society. In this paper, the effect of tribal values and norms on family structures par- ticularly with regards to women is delineated analyzed and discussed. The influence and similari- ty to Muslim cultural tribal structures in and outside of Mongolia are used in a comparative socio- logical meta analysis methodology. Keywords Mongolia, Tribes, Values, Women 1. Introduction Roughly the size of Alaska, Mongolia is a landlocked country between Russia on its northern frontier and China on its southern border. With just over three million inhabitants it is sparsely populated, with nearly half of the people living in the capital city of Ulaanbaatar, and in other provincial centers. -
Promoting Dryland Sustainable Landscapes and Biodiversity Conservation in the Eastern Steppe of Mongolia” Project
Environmental and Social Management Framework for “Promoting Dryland Sustainable Landscapes and Biodiversity Conservation in The Eastern Steppe of Mongolia” Project ULAANBAATAR 2020 Required citation: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), World Wildlife Fund (WWF). 2020. Environmental and Social Management Framework for “Promoting Dryland Sustainable Landscapes and Biodiversity Conservation in The Eastern Steppe of Mongolia” Project. Ulaanbaatar. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, WWF, 2020 Some rights reserved. This worK is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAliKe 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this worK may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this worK, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. -
Mongolica Pragensia ’16 9/2
Mongolica Pragensia ’16 9/2 Mongolica Pragensia ’16 Ethnolinguistics, Sociolinguistics, Religion and Culture Volume 9, No. 2 Publication of Charles University Faculty of Arts, Department of South and Central Asia Seminar of Mongolian and Tibetan Studies Prague 2016 ISSN 1803–5647 This journal is published as a part of the Programme for the Development of Fields of Study at Charles University, Oriental Studies, sub-programme “The process of transformation in the language and cultural differentness of the countries of South and Central Asia”, a project of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University. The publication of this Issue was supported by the TRITON Publishing House. Mongolica Pragensia ’16 Linguistics, Ethnolinguistics, Religion and Culture Volume 9, No. 2 (2016) © Editors Editors-in-chief: Veronika Kapišovská and Veronika Zikmundová Editorial Board: Daniel Berounský (Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic) Agata Bareja-Starzyńska (University of Warsaw, Poland) Katia Buffetrille (École pratique des Hautes-Études, Paris, France) J. Lubsangdorji (Charles University Prague, Czech Republic) Marie-Dominique Even (Centre National des Recherches Scientifiques, Paris, France) Veronika Kapišovská (Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic) Marek Mejor (University of Warsaw, Poland) Tsevel Shagdarsurung (National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia) Domiin Tömörtogoo (National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia) Veronika Zikmundová (Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic) English correction: Dr. Mark Corner (HUB University, Brussels) Department of South and Central Asia, Seminar of Mongolian and Tibetan Studies Faculty of Arts, Charles University Celetná 20, 116 42 Praha 1, Czech Republic http://mongolistika.ff.cuni.cz Publisher: Stanislav Juhaňák – TRITON http://www.triton-books.cz Vykáňská 5, 100 00 Praha 10 IČ 18433499 Praha (Prague) 2016 Cover Renata Brtnická Typeset Studio Marvil Printed by Art D – Grafický ateliér Černý s. -
Online Appendices Here
APPENDIX A: EFFECTIVE NUMBER OF PARTIES BY COUNTRY AND YEAR The effec've number of par'es equals the reciprocal of the sum of the squared propor'on of the vote received by each party with independent candidates each treated as separate par'es. Effective Number Country Year of Electoral Parties Antigua and Barbuda 1994 2.05 Antigua and Barbuda 1999 2.09 Antigua and Barbuda 2004 2.07 Antigua and Barbuda 2009 2.07 Argentina 1991 3.98 Argentina 1993 3.57 Argentina 1995 3.61 Argentina 1997 3.65 Argentina 1999 3.28 Argentina 2001 6.08 Argentina 2003 5.39 Argentina 2005 6.38 Australia 1990 3.37 Australia 1993 2.90 Australia 1996 3.20 Australia 1998 3.46 Australia 2001 3.43 Australia 2004 3.18 Australia 2007 3.03 Australia 2010 3.83 Austria 1990 3.16 Austria 1994 3.87 Austria 1995 3.59 Austria 1999 3.82 Austria 2002 3.02 Austria 2006 3.71 Austria 2008 4.83 Bahamas 1992 1.98 Bahamas 1997 1.97 Bahamas 2002 2.28 Bahamas 2007 2.13 Barbados 1991 2.28 Barbados 1994 2.52 Barbados 1999 1.84 Barbados 2003 1.98 Effective Number Country Year of Electoral Parties Barbados 2008 2.00 Belgium 1991 9.81 Belgium 1995 9.46 Belgium 1999 10.27 Belgium 2003 8.84 Belgium 2007 9.04 Belgium 2010 10.04 Belize 1993 2.00 Belize 1998 1.96 Belize 2003 2.04 Belize 2008 2.03 Botswana 1994 2.34 Botswana 1999 2.44 Botswana 2004 2.74 Botswana 2009 2.71 Brazil 1990 9.80 Brazil 1994 8.52 Brazil 1998 8.14 Brazil 2002 9.28 Brazil 2006 10.62 Brazil 2010 11.21 Bulgaria 1991 4.18 Bulgaria 1994 3.85 Bulgaria 1997 3.00 Bulgaria 2001 3.94 Bulgaria 2005 5.80 Bulgaria 2009 4.40 Canada 1993 -
Mongolian Cultural Orientation
Table of Contents Chapter 1: Profile ............................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 6 Geography ................................................................................................................................... 6 Area ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Climate .................................................................................................................................... 7 Geographic Divisions and Topographic Features ................................................................... 8 Rivers and Lakes ..................................................................................................................... 9 Major Cities ............................................................................................................................... 10 Ulaanbaatar ............................................................................................................................ 10 Erdenet ................................................................................................................................... 11 Darhan ..................................................................................................................................