DOCSLIB.ORG

Studia Antiqua Et Archaeologica Xvii (2011)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Studia Antiqua Et Archaeologica Xvii (2011) UNIVERSITÉ „AL. I. CUZA” I A Ş I FACULTÉ D’HISTOIRE SÉMINAIRE ET CHAIRE D’HISTOIRE ANCIENNE ET D’ARCHÉOLOGIE CENTRE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE DʹÉTUDES ARCHÉOHISTORIQUES STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA XVII (2011) EDITURA UNIVERSITĂȚII „ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA” IAŞI ‐ 2011 COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE: Lucrețiu Mihailescu‐Bîrliba (rédacteur en chef) (Iaşi) Acad. Prof. Mircea Petrescu‐Dîmbovița (Iaşi) Acad. Victor Spinei (Iaşi) Nicolae Ursulescu (Iaşi) Attila László (Iaşi) Svend Hansen (Berlin) Martin Hose (München) Christoph Schäfer (Trier) Wolfgang Schuller (Konstanz) Olivier Weller (Paris) Gocha R. Tsetskhladze (Melbourne) Alexader Falileyev (Aberystwyth) Ion Sandu (Iaşi) Alexander Rubel (Iaşi) Adrian Poruciuc (Iaşi) COMITÉ DE RÉDACTION Roxana‐Gabriela Curcă (secrétariat de rédaction) Marius Alexianu, Neculai Bolohan, Octavian Bounegru, Iulia Dumitrache (membres). La responsabilité du contenu scientifique et sur la forme des articles revient intégralement aux auteurs. Les manuscrits, les livres et les revues proposés en échange et pour comptes‐rendus, ainsi que toute la correspondance seront adressés à la Redaction: Universitatea “Al.I. Cuza”, Facultatea de Istorie, Catedra de Istorie Veche şi Arheologie, Bulevardul Carol I, no.11, 700506 – Iaşi, Roumanie. Tel. 032/201614; Fax. 0040.32.201201; 0040.32.201156 E‐mail: sem‐[email protected] ISSN 1224‐2284 SOMMAIRE‐CONTENTS Geophysical Prospecting Techniques Used in Archaeology. Magnetometry ANDREI ASĂNDULESEI ……………………………………………….. 5 Aşezarea din perioada bronzului târziu de la Negrileşti, jud. Galați ADRIAN ADAMESCU, COSTEL ILIE …………………………..….… 19 Documents officiels concernant les prix et les taxes des produits romains à base de poisson IULIA DUMITRACHE …………………………………………….…… 49 Building God’s Dwelling Place. Synagogues And Houses Of Prayer In Anatolia And Eastern Europe During The Roman Period IULIAN MOGA ......................................................................................... 65 La cité romaine du Haut‐Empire D’Ibida (Mésie Inférieure). Considérations historiques selon le dossier epigraphique LUCREȚIU MIHAILESCU‐BÎRLIBA …………………………………. 83 Divine Presence in the Bathhouses of Roman Dacia ANDREA CUMURCIUC ....................................................................... 145 Society and Religion in Ilişua: A Comment ALEXANDER FALILEYEV ……………………………………………155 Some General Considerations Regarding the Discoveries of Roman Glass Vessels from (L)Ibida – Slava Rusă (Tulcea County) SEVER – PETRU BOȚAN, COSTEL CHIRIAC …………………...… 163 La production de projectiles en terre cuite dans le Nord‐Est de la Moesia Inferior. L’exemple du four de potier de Telița «Mamia» DAMIEN GLAD, GEORGE NUȚU ……………………………..…… 183 Piese de centură romane descoperite la Argamum sector „extra muros” GEORGE NUȚU, MIHAELA IACOB ………………………………... 197 Comptes‐rendus …………………………………………………………............ 231 Abréviations ……………………………………………………………………... 243 Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica XVII, 2011 GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING TECHNIQUES USED IN ARCHAEOLOGY. MAGNETOMETRY1 ANDREI ASĂNDULESEI2 Keywords: non‐invasive techniques, magnetometry, excavation strategy, cultural resources management. Abstract: Acquainting archaeologists with the basic principles behind non‐invasive archaeological prospecting methods, techniques and equipment, and with the possibilities presented by them and their limits, is imperiously necessary for any research endeavour. Of particular concern are the archaeologists involved in preventive and salvage archaeology, cultural heritage management and those who must elaborate coherent archaeological research strategies. Résumé: Familiariser les archéologues avec les principes de base, les méthodes, les techniques et les équipements de prospection archéologique non‐invasive, et avec les possibilités offertes par eux et leurs limites, est impérieusement nécessaire pour toutes les entreprises de recherche. Les archéologues impliqués dans lʹarchéologie préventive et de sauvetage, dans la gestion du patrimoine culturel, et ceux qui doivent élaborer des stratégies cohérentes de la recherche archéologique, sont particulièrement visés. Rezumat: Familiarizarea arheologilor cu principiile de bază, metodele, tehnicile și echipamentele întrebuințate în cercetarea arheologică non‐destructivă, cu posibilitățile şi limitele acestora, este imperios necesară pentru orice efort științific. Sunt vizați mai ales arheologii implicați în arheologia preventivă și de salvare, gestionarea patrimoniului cultural și cei care trebuie să elaboreze strategii coerente de cercetare arheologică. 1 This work was supported by the the European Social Fund in Romania, under the responsibility of the Managing Authority for the Sectoral Operational Programme for Human Resources Development 2007‐2013 [grant POSDRU/88/1.5/S/47646]. 2 ʺAlexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, ARHEOINVEST Research Platform; e‐mail: [email protected]; Web: http://arheoinvest.uaic.ro/asandulesei. 6 ANDREI ASĂNDULESEI Introduction Among scientists involved in archaeological research it is known the fact that today the archaeological sites are increasingly vulnerable to risks of natural and, particularly, anthropic origin. Given the nature of their work, the archaeologists are currently more concerned than ever by this problem. A judicious management of the tangible cultural heritage requires a classification of the archaeological sites by placing them into three categories: a. Those found in areas unaffected by the above‐mentioned risk factors; b. Those found in areas which are going to be affected by anthropic works or in which the risk of natural hazards is increased; c. Sites which are going to be entirely destroyed and thus require an urgent gathering and recovering of information. In any of these situations, any technique for non‐destructive investigation used in the process of site inspection and evaluation can help in acquiring crucial scientific information; therefore, the capital importance of such endeavours is proved. The information thus obtained, combined with that gathered from field surveying or probing (represented by specific symbols on topographical maps), can produce important data on the past human activity. A preliminary analysis of the material obtained from ordinary fieldwalking can easily set the site within a chronological timeline, but it does not allow for an exact assessment of the surface area occupied by the site, the areas with agglomerations of archaeological material, or the depth at which they lie. All of these questions can be easily answered by employing non‐invasive research methods and techniques. Archaeological research increasingly uses land geophysical investigations as an ancillary science which, co‐jointly with aerial photography, 3D laser scanning, and satellite imaging, constitute a category of quick, economical and flexible methods applicable in any archaeological environment. These methods provide the possibility of delivering high‐ GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING TECHNIQUES IN ARCHAEOLOGY 7 quality data, using GIS (Geographic Information System) software, of the nature and features of the detected archaeological remains. The dataʹs processing and rendering in formats accessible and intelligible to archaeologists, coupled by a rigorous understanding of the possibilities and limits presented by these methods, can lead to the elaboration of a suitable methodology which can ensure the success of the research campaign. Initially applied particularly in geology, the geophysical methods can measure the various physical properties of the soil and rocks, while also being sensitive to anthropically induced changes. The methods required adaptation and calibration because the archaeological features are found at a much smaller scale, of a magnitude of several centimetres or metres at best, that the geological ones which can span for kilometres; only some of the methods were suitable for this kind of research.3 Usually, the geophysical methods are classified, according to the type of equipment used, into two major groups: passive and active. In the case of the former, the amplitude of the signal generated by the archaeological features is measured directly, while in the case of the latter, an artificial impulse is fed into the soil and subsequently recorded, with its more‐or‐less altered traits.4 A short history The beginnings of magnetic research in archaeology are to be found in England. Following a conference held by the Canadian physicist John Belshe, the archaeologist Graham Webster pondered whether the same technique could be applied in archaeology, for the in situ identification of kilns. The fact that the magnetic approach was viable was previously demonstrated by Belshe following a project of experimental archaeology in which he managed to detect the magnetic signal of a reconstructed Romano‐British kiln.5 In search of practical solutions to his problem, Webster referred it to Martin 3 WEYMOUTH 1986, 313; WYNN 1986, 245. 4 WEYMOUTH 1986, 313‐314; PIRO 2009, 28. 5 AITKEN 1958, 24; 1986, 15. 8 ANDREI ASĂNDULESEI Aitken and Eduard Hall from the Laboratory for Archaeology and Art History Research, from the University of Oxford. The two researches had already been interested by this problem, and despite having only two months at their disposal for resolving the challenge, they manage, by March 1958, to design and build an implement which could be used for detecting underground archaeological structures (Figure 1).6 The same spring, the first volume of the Archaeometry journal7, and in an article published in 1986 in the Italian publication
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reflections of Roman Imperialisms
    Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Edited by Marko A. Janković and Vladimir D. Mihajlović Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Edited by Marko A. Janković and Vladimir D. Mihajlović This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Marko A. Janković, Vladimir D. Mihajlović and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0625-8 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0625-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations .................................................................................... vii List of Tables ............................................................................................... x Reflecting Roman Imperialisms .................................................................. 1 Vladimir D. Mihajlović & Marko A. Janković Lost and (re)found? The Biography of Some Apparently Roman Artefacts in Ireland .................................................................................... 30 Michael Ann Bevivino Rural Society on the Edge of Empire: Copper Alloy Vessels in Roman Britain Reported through the Portable Antiquities Scheme ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Vama Romană De La Capidava
    VAMA ROMANĂ DE LA CAPIDAVA 1 AUTORI: Două inscripții cunoscute de mai multă vreme Cunoaștem însă alte câteva stationes atestate unui nou birou de vamă la vărsarea râului Axios în cetății, pe latura de N-V, deasupra temeliei, reutilizată menționează un birou vamal (statio portorii) și implicit expressis verbis pe cale epigrafică pentru Moesia Dunăre. În sfârșit, un birou vamal a funcționat cu ca material de construcție într-o epocă mai târzie. Ioan Carol Opriș Universitatea din București un important punct comercial la Capidava pentru sec. Inferior, în afara celei de la Capidava. Urcând pe cursul siguranță la Tyras, iar relațiile cu locuitorii cetății nu IMAGINEA 2 . Monumentul a fost ridicat cândva în ultima Alexandru Raţiu II-III p.Chr. Acest birou se afla în responsabilitatea unui Dunării, existența lor este asigurată în vecinătatea au fost dintre cele mai fericite în secolul al II-lea, parte a domniei împăratului Antoninus Pius (cca 155- Muzeul Național de Istorie conductor, iar mai apoi cea a unui procurator, pentru lagărului legionar la Durostorum și, iarăși, la Dimum, necesitând intervenția repetată a legaților provinciali 161). Personajul în cinstea căruia se ridică monumentul a României ultimii ani de domnie ai lui Antoninus Pius, respectiv Oescus, Ostrovo. Foarte probabil unul funcționa și la ai Moesiei Inferior. este unul de mare notorietate în întreaga regiune, T. din timpul sau chiar după Marcus Aurelius (ISM V 10; 12 Novae, iar în interiorul provinciei alte câteva epigrafe Iulius Saturninus. El ocupă în această vreme poziția = Capidava I, 12; 8). Ambele piese au fost descoperite pot indica birouri vamale și la Nicopolis ad Istrum, ori Prima epigrafă este un altar onorific din calcar (ISM conductor al unei părți din marele district vamal, pe de către Grigore Florescu, la începutul cercetărilor Montana IMAGINEA 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Commagenorum
    CASTELUL DE LA CAPUT STENARUM ŞI COHORS I FLAVIA COMMAGENORUM Cristian SCHUSTER* Fortificaţia de la Boiţa/Caput Stenarum Înainte de a părăsi Transilvania, Oltul face un unghi de aproape 90 de grade, pornind apoi spre sud, prin Carpaţii Meridionali, devenind ulterior „graniţa” dintre Oltenia şi Muntenia. Chiar în dreptul respectivului cot, pe malul drept al râului, investigaţiile arheologice au permis descoperirea resturilor unei fortificaţii romane. Acestea, aflate în punctul cunoscut sub denumirea În Rude (fig. 1), se găsesc astăzi pe teritoriul satului Boiţa (oraşul Tălmaciu, judeţul Sibiu)1. Aşa cum se ştie, cei mai mulţi dintre specialişti consideră că în acest sat trebuie localizat ceea ce Tabula Peutingeriana indică a fi Caput Stenarum2. Prezenţa urmelor romane a fost semnalată încă de la sfârşitul veacului al XIX-lea - începutul celui următor3. Primele cercetări arheologice s-au derulat în 19574, fiind continuate în 19585, 19736, 19797 şi, în cadrul practicii arheologice a studenţilor de la Facultatea de Filologie-Istorie din Sibiu, în vara anului 19818. Fortificaţiei, prin dimensiunile sale reduse – „de 46 x 47 m, fiind, deci, aproape pătrată”9, i se potriveşte mai degrabă termenul de castellum decât cel de castrum. Cu privire la momentul ridicării fortificaţiei din piatră, dar şi a „termelor cu palestrele, tabulariului vămii şi construcţiile cu caracter gospodăresc” s-a emis ipoteza că ele au fost realizate „după anii 167-169 e.n., când s-a operat reorganizarea administrativă şi militară de către Marcus Aurelius”10. Spre această concluzie * Institutul de Arheologie „Vasile Pârvan” - Centrul de Tracologie, Bucureşti; e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Ghinea 1998. Despre denumirea În Rude a punctului, vezi: Albescu 1938, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Defence Sites on the Danube River and Environmental Changes
    Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XIII 563 Roman defence sites on the Danube River and environmental changes D. Constantinescu Faculty Material’s Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Romania Abstract There are many things to learn from the past regarding ancient settlements, the ancient organization of cities, the structures of the buildings and concerning the everyday life of our ancestors. There are numerous sites along the Danube River which were once included in the economic and defensive system of the Roman Empire. Many of them are not well known today or studies are in their very early stages. Sucidava is an example of a Daco-Roman historical defence site, situated on the north bank of the Danube. The ancient heritage site covers more than two hectares; comprising the Roman-Byzantine basilica of the 4th century, the oldest place of worship north of the Danube, the building containing the hypocaust dates from the late 6th century AD, Constantine the Great portal bridge, to span the Danube river, the gates linking the bridge and city, a Roman fountain dating from the 2nd century AD. This entire defensive and communication system stands as a testimony to the complexity of an historical conception. However, how was it possible that such sophisticated structures have been partially or totally destroyed? Certainly not only economic and military aspects might be a likely explanation. The present article considers the evolution of the sites from cultural ecology point of view, as well as taking into consideration environmental and climatic changes. Doubtless, the overall evolution of this site is not singular.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimitar Ignatov Project Coordinator CEO Iwalk.Bg Euroregion Pleven-Olt Association Area: 4 333 Km² Population: 269 760 11 Municipalities Art
    Digitization of historical sites in Bulgaria Patra, 17/03/2018 Svetlana Dimitrova-Sotirova Expert: Dimitar Ignatov Project Coordinator CEO iwalk.bg Euroregion Pleven-Olt Association Area: 4 333 km² Population: 269 760 11 Municipalities Art. 1 of EUROPEAN CONVENTION for preservation of archaeological heritage defines the term „archaeological heritage” –collection of "all remains and objects, as well as other traces of mankind from past epochs", whose preservation and exploration supports "the tracking of the history of mankind and its relation to the natural environment”. The main sources of information are "excavations or finds, as well as other methods for the study of mankind and the related environment". Archaeological Heritage "includes structures, buildings, groups of buildings, objects, movable and other monuments, and their context, whether on land or under water." Bulgaria owns treasures so deeply hidden even for the most enthusiastic tourists or historians. Such an example is Ulpia Oescus – forgotten ancient Romanian town, central town of the Roman province Moesia Inferior, which remains were found near village of Gigen, District of Pleven. Ulpia Oescus one of the largest and significant towns in the Lower Danube region during the Roman era (II–IV AD), which nowadays is part of the world cultural and historical heritage. The News from 01.09.2016 „Fire burned the ancient town Ulpia Oescus near village of Gigen. According to the head of archeological research, part of the damages can not be restored.“ 3D laser scanning of part of Ulipa Ouescus 3D Interactive Map What is IWALK BG? Idea Vision Innovation 1 2 3D graphics with underlined tale 3 Unified multimedia platform offering: The platform gathers together all the information that tourists need for a style and practically unlimited .
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeometric Investigation of Roman Glass Finds from Bulgaria Introduction Experimental
    Berliner Beiträge zur Archäometrie Seite 183-198 1999 Archaeometric investigation of roman glass finds from Bulgaria I. KULEFF, R. DJINGOVA Faculty of Chemistry, University of Sofia 1126-Sofia, B ulgaria Introduction Glass finds discovered in the European part of the Roman Empaire are usually referred to as Romanglasses while the glass from the Near East and Egypt is considered separately although it has been produced in the same period of time. One of the reasons for this classification isthat glass production in Egypt and the Near East has had a long tradition while the knowledge of glassmaking has been introduced in the Roman Empire from Mesopotamia and Egypt and is considered as new for the territories of Italy and the Eastern provinces. The territory of present Bulgaria belongs to these regions. The Iack of enough chemico-thechnological investigations of Roman glass excavated in Italy was recognized in the Iiterature in the early 80-ies (e.g. Goffer, 1980) and it was recently compensated by the investigations carred out by Casoli&Mirti (1992) and Verita&Toninaga (1990). This Iack is stillmorevalid for the glass, excavated on Bulgarian territory where only a sporadic information exists which does not provide an answer to the questions concerning the technology of glassmaking. It is worth mentioning that the finds from that period are numerous (see e.g. Kabakhcieva, 1987; 1996; 1997; 1997a; Mincev, 1986; 1988; 1989; 1990; 1992) and there are direct evidences for glass production in Bulgaria in the period 1' '- S'h century AD (Kabakhcieva, 1987; 1996; 1997; 1997a;). Therefore the aim ofthe present study is to investigate glass finds from the Romanperiod in Bulgaria using Instrumental Neu­ tron Activation Analysis (INAA).
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraficeiscylptyral1
    MONVMENTELE EPIGRAFICEISCYLPTYRAL1 ALE -AryzEviNT NATIONAL DE ANTICHITATI DIN BVCVRETI PVBLICATE SVI3 AVSPICIILE ACADEMIEI ROMANE DE GR.G. TOCILESCV Membru al Academiei Romano, al Institutelor archeologice din Roma si Viena, al Sccietiltilor archeologice din Paris, Orleans, Bruxelles, Roma, Atena, Odesa gi Moscova, al Societatii geografice, numismaticei istorice din Bucuresti, al Societatii istorice din Moscova, al Societatii de etnograflesiantropologie din Paris, etc., Vice-preseclinte al Ateneului Roman, Prof..la Universitatea din Bucuresti, Director al Muzeului national de antichitati, etc. 1 PARTEA II COLECTIVNEA SCVLPTVRALA. A MVZEVLVI PA.N.A. IN ANVL 1881. IBUCURETI NOIJA TIPOGRAFIE PROFESIONALA DIM. C. IONESCIT io.-STRADA SELARE. Jo. r 1908 a ..NicoLAe BALCESCU" PARTEA II MONVMENTELE SCVLPTVRALI I RELIEFURI ANTICE N.. 1 Capul in relief al unui rege al Assyriei, (pate Aur- nasir-pal), sail al until resbornic assyrian. Relieful oblu neinfatiseza,intr'omarime superiors Desoriptinnea. naturel, capul until rege al Assyriel, pate al lul Aur- nasir- pal, sail al unui resboinic assyrian. Perul capulul este acoperit pang la frunte§icefa de o legatura fa'cuta in chip de tichie §i fixata cu o curea latti pe dupa, urechY. Barba cea lungs, ca ipletele lasate pe spate, sunt frisate in carliontl. Monumentul provine din ruinele anticuluY ora§ Niniveh,Proveninta unde a fost gasit de d. Cocio Cohen impreuna cu fragmentul din inscriptiunea analelor lul A§ur-nasir-pal, regale Assyriel, publicat inacesta opera sub nr. 97 (pag. 479)§i avand aceia§1 proveninta 1). Faptul acesta al unel proveninteco- 1) Proveninta dela Niniveh a ambelor monumente se atesti prin raportul nr. 13 din 12 Maiti 1869 adresat Ministerukil instructiunki publice de clitre con- servatorul Musgulul de AntichitAtI.
    [Show full text]
  • Harttimo 1.Pdf
    Beyond the River, under the Eye of Rome Ethnographic Landscapes, Imperial Frontiers, and the Shaping of a Danubian Borderland by Timothy Campbell Hart A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Greek and Roman History) in the University of Michigan 2017 Doctoral Committee: Professor David S. Potter, Co-Chair Professor Emeritus Raymond H. Van Dam, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Ian David Fielding Professor Christopher John Ratté © Timothy Campbell Hart [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8640-131X For my family ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Developing and writing a dissertation can, at times, seem like a solo battle, but in my case, at least, this was far from the truth. I could not have completed this project without the advice and support of many individuals, most crucially, my dissertation co-chairs David S. Potter, and Raymond Van Dam. Ray saw some glimmer of potential in me and worked to foster it from the moment I arrived at Michigan. I am truly thankful for his support throughout the years and constant advice on both academic and institutional matters. In particular, our conversations about demographics and the movement of people in the ancient world were crucial to the genesis of this project. Throughout the writing process, Ray’s firm encouragement towards clarity of argument and style, while not always what I wanted to hear, have done much to make this a stronger dissertation. David Potter has provided me with a lofty academic model towards which to strive. I admire the breadth and depth of his scholarship; working and teaching with him have shown me much worth emulating.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Legions: a Page of the Roman Numismatic Gallery (
    Roman Legions: A Page of the Roman Numismatic Gallery (www.romancoins.info) Legion Caesar Augustus Tiberius Claudius Nero Vespasian Domitian Trajan Hadrian M. Aurel SepSev 300 AD I Adiutrix . Misenium 68 Mogontiacum Mogontiacu Brigetio 97 Brigetio Brigetio Brigetio Brigetio Galba 69/70 m 85 Dacia Camp (Otho) Sirmium 89 Parthia Bodriacum ? bis 97 Camp 114-6 I Augusta Hispania Col Agrippi Bonna Bonna 69/70 Germanica Gallia 19 BC - 16 Col Agrippina (Germanicus 9 AD - Bonna 16 - I Italica 66 Gallia Novae 69 Novae Novae Novae Novae Novae Novae Cisalp Dcia Camp 68 Lugdunum (Vitellius) I Minerva Bonna 82 Moesien Bonna Bonna -161 Bonna Bonna Dacia Camp Orient 161- Bonna 105 166 Bonna 167- I Parthica Singara (Mesopotam) II Adiutrix 69 Ravenna Deva Dacia Aquincum Aquincum Aquincum Aquincum Noviomagus -86/88 101-106 70 Singidunum Aquincum Orient 161- Lindum (Brit) 87-89 106 166 70/71-78 Aquincum 89 II Augusta 43 BC 17 Britannia 43 Glevum Glevum Isca Isca Isca Isca Isca Isca CVibius Pansa Argentorate (Vespasianus) (Gloucester) -75 (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) 30 BC (Germanicus 67- 75 - Hispania T 9AD Rhein II Italica Aquilea 165 Lauriacum Lauriacum Locica 170-2 Albing 172-2 Lauriacum 205 II Parthica 197 Alba 202 Alba (Rom) Parther (Caracalla) II Traiana 105 125 Nicopolis Nicopolis Nicopolis Laodicea Nicopolis Legion Caesar Augustus Tiberius Claudius Nero Vespasian Domitian Trajan Hadrian M. Aurel SepSev 300 AD 114-116 (Aegypten) Parther 117 Judea (Ägypten) III Augusta 43 BC Ammaedra Ammaedra Ammaedra Ammaedra
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Role of the Roman Army in the Province of Lower Moesia (Moesia Inferior) INSTITUTE of EUROPEAN CULTURE ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY in POZNAŃ
    Economic role of the Roman army in the province of Lower Moesia (Moesia Inferior) INSTITUTE OF EUROPEAN CULTURE ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY IN POZNAŃ ACTA HUMANISTICA GNESNENSIA VOL. XVI ECONOMIC ROLE OF THE ROMAN ARMY IN THE PROVINCE OF LOWER MOESIA (MOESIA INFERIOR) Michał Duch This books takes a comprehensive look at the Roman army as a factor which prompted substantial changes and economic transformations in the province of Lower Moesia, discussing its impact on the development of particular branches of the economy. The volume comprises five chapters. Chapter One, entitled “Before Lower Moesia: A Political and Economic Outline” consti- tutes an introduction which presents the economic circumstances in the region prior to Roman conquest. In Chapter Two, entitled “Garrison of the Lower Moesia and the Scale of Militarization”, the author estimates the size of the garrison in the province and analyzes the influence that the military presence had on the demography of Lower Moesia. The following chapter – “Monetization” – is concerned with the financial standing of the Roman soldiery and their contri- bution to the monetization of the province. Chapter Four, “Construction”, addresses construction undertakings on which the army embarked and the outcomes it produced, such as urbanization of the province, sustained security and order (as envisaged by the Romans), expansion of the economic market and exploitation of the province’s natural resources. In the final chapter, entitled “Military Logistics and the Local Market”, the narrative focuses on selected aspects of agriculture, crafts and, to a slightly lesser extent, on trade and services. The book demonstrates how the Roman army, seeking to meet its provisioning needs, participated in and contributed to the functioning of these industries.
    [Show full text]
  • FL. MATEI-POPESCU Cu Corecturi.Indd
    https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Florian Matei-Popescu THE ROMAN ARMY IN MOESIA INFERIOR https://biblioteca-digitala.ro “VASILE PÂRVAN” INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF ROMANIAN HISTORY THE CENTRE FOR ROMAN MILITARY STUDIES 7 Series editors: OVIDIU ŢENTEA FLORIAN MATEI-POPESCU https://biblioteca-digitala.ro FLORIAN MATEI-POPESCU THE ROMAN ARMY IN MOESIA INFERIOR CONPHYS PUBLISHING HOUSE Bucharest, 2010 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Th is volume is printed in the framework of the STRATEG Project – PNCDI II, P4, 91 010/ 2007, fi nanced by the National Authority for Scientifi c Research (ANCS). General editors: Ovidiu Ţentea and Florian Matei-Popescu Cover design: Andrei Cîmpeanu © Florian Matei-Popescu & CRMS First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the publishers and editors. Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României MATEI-POPESCU, FLORIAN Th e Roman Army in Moesia Inferior Florian Matei-Popescu. – Bucureşti : Conphys, 2010 ISBN 978-973-750-177-6 Edited and printed by CONPHYS Romania, Râmnicu Vâlcea www.conphys.ro https://biblioteca-digitala.ro To Valentina and Ilinca https://biblioteca-digitala.ro https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Contents Foreword 9 Author’s preface 11 List of abbreviations 13 Introduction 19 I. Legio V Macedonica 35 1. Legion history prior the establishment of the province of Moesia Inferior 35 2. Legion history between 86 and 167 45 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Space and Identity in Roman Moesia
    Space and Identity in Roman Moesia Space and Identity in Roman Moesia: Rethinking Military and Civilian Spheres in a Frontier Province Lina Diers Defining military and civilian spheres in the Roman province of Moesia is no easy task. Although the province’s numerous military structures along the Danube Limes (fortified but permeable frontier) and in its inland are well-known, there is certainly some confusion when it comes to the embedment of these structures within Moesia’s settlement patterns and particularly their civilian factor. On one hand, epigraphic evidence attests to the common frontier province phenomenon of so-called settlement dualism of canabae (settlement structure featuring soldiers’ families and supply units alongside legionary camps and auxiliary forts) and vici (village/civilian settlement structure ranging between urban and rural character) in all the major legionary camp sites of Moesia. On the other, the state of archaeological research in Moesia does not (or not yet) allow a distinct location or spatial separation of canabae and vici at most sites. Instead, the site conditions rather display surprising degrees of mixing military and civilian administration and living spheres contradicting the concept of settlement dualism. By introducing several examples for this situation, this article discusses if it is useful or even necessary in current modes of post-processual, post/-anti-colonial and identity- oriented discourse in Roman Archaeology to spatially divide military and civilian spheres in clarifying everyday life reality and settlement patterns in Roman Moesia. Institute for European and Mediterranean Archaeology 1 Lina Diers Introduction area. While the legionary deployments and their consequences at the very beginning The Roman province of Moesia was founded of Roman presence in the Balkans are still in the period between 15 and 45 C.E.
    [Show full text]