Archaeometric Investigation of Roman Glass Finds from Bulgaria Introduction Experimental

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archaeometric Investigation of Roman Glass Finds from Bulgaria Introduction Experimental Berliner Beiträge zur Archäometrie Seite 183-198 1999 Archaeometric investigation of roman glass finds from Bulgaria I. KULEFF, R. DJINGOVA Faculty of Chemistry, University of Sofia 1126-Sofia, B ulgaria Introduction Glass finds discovered in the European part of the Roman Empaire are usually referred to as Romanglasses while the glass from the Near East and Egypt is considered separately although it has been produced in the same period of time. One of the reasons for this classification isthat glass production in Egypt and the Near East has had a long tradition while the knowledge of glassmaking has been introduced in the Roman Empire from Mesopotamia and Egypt and is considered as new for the territories of Italy and the Eastern provinces. The territory of present Bulgaria belongs to these regions. The Iack of enough chemico-thechnological investigations of Roman glass excavated in Italy was recognized in the Iiterature in the early 80-ies (e.g. Goffer, 1980) and it was recently compensated by the investigations carred out by Casoli&Mirti (1992) and Verita&Toninaga (1990). This Iack is stillmorevalid for the glass, excavated on Bulgarian territory where only a sporadic information exists which does not provide an answer to the questions concerning the technology of glassmaking. It is worth mentioning that the finds from that period are numerous (see e.g. Kabakhcieva, 1987; 1996; 1997; 1997a; Mincev, 1986; 1988; 1989; 1990; 1992) and there are direct evidences for glass production in Bulgaria in the period 1' '- S'h century AD (Kabakhcieva, 1987; 1996; 1997; 1997a;). Therefore the aim ofthe present study is to investigate glass finds from the Romanperiod in Bulgaria using Instrumental Neu­ tron Activation Analysis (INAA). The method for analysis is described in Kuleff et al., (1984; 1988) and Kuleff&Djingova (1990). Thus data for the chemical composition of glasses from the Romanperiod in Bulgaria will be obtained for the firsttime and the results might be used for initial conclusions about the technology of glass production. Experimental 1. Material. Twenty six glass finds, referred to the Roman period, were subjected to analysis. Nine from the finds were excavated in the glass-workshop in the Roman town Oescus (the workshop is dated to the firsthalf of yct- firsthalf of 4'h century AD). Three of them represent glass from glassmelting tubs excavated in the workshop. The I 0 finds from Varna and the 5 finds from the Romanvilla Arrnira belong to the 2"ct - 4'h century AD, while the two finds from Kaliakra are dated to the 4'h- 6'h century AD. A short description of the finds is given in Table 1 and the investigated sites are presented in Fig.1. 183 a- 0 E s c U s b- V A R N A c-KALIAKRA d-ARMIRA Fig. 1: Map of Bulgaria showing the iocation of the samfing piaces. 2. Method of analysis. To remove surface contamination the g1ass sampies are carefully washed with tap water, detergent and brush and rinsed with deionized water. Thus the thin iridescent weathering iayer (if present) is removed. The samples are piaced between poiyetheiene plates, crushed and homogenized in an agate mortar. INAA (Kuieff et al., 1984; 1988; Kuieff&Djingova, 1990) and energy dispersive X-ray tluorecsence analysis (ED XRFA) have been used for the analysis ofthe investigated giass finds. INAA was used to determine the content of Al, As, Ba, Ca, Ce, Cl, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Dy, Eu, Fe, Hf, La, Mg, Mn, Na, Rb, Sb, Sc, Sm, Ta, Th, Ti, V, and Yb in the sampies after two irradiations with piie and one with epithermal neutrons and six measurements (twice after each irradiation) (Kuleff et al., 1984; Kuleff&Djingova, 1990). The gamma-spectra were measured with a HP Ge detector (energy resolution 1.9 keV and efficiency 15 % for i332.5 keY gamma line of 6°Co) connected to a 4096 channei pulse height anaiyser (Canbena 35 +). ED XRFA was used for determination of the content of Iead and sodium in some of the investigated samples. Excitation was done by X-rays produced by a tube: voltage 30 kV; current 0.15 mA, Ag anode and filter rhodium. The obtained anaiytical data (Tabie 2) were subjected to duster analysis using the program package of Brookhaven National Labaratory (Sayre, 1988). The fo ii owing subprograms were used: - CONDIST = for caiculation of distance coefficient matrix using squared mean Eudedean distance; -AGCLUS = for aggregative hierarchical dustering using " nature's group" as dustering method. The duster size is defined as the mean of the distances between all pairs of points within the duster, notjust pairs of distinct items, i.e. the "diagonal" entities ofthe di ss imiiarities matrix are induded in the mean and the size is multiplied by the number of specimens within the duster. Clustering proceeds by joining in sequence those dusters for which the new duster would have a minimum net increase in size over the combined sizes to the clusters tobe merged. 184 Table 1: Description ofthe investigated glass samples. Lab.code Description Colour Date Excavation c. AD site 52 .0ES Fragment, disc form, thick folded rim deep green IV-VI Oescus 53.0ES Glass from glassmelting tub green 111-IV Oescus 54 .0ES Fragment of bracelet colourless slight yellow 11-IV Oescus 56.0ES Fragment of window glass colourless slight yellow 111-IV Oescus 57.0ES Fragment of vessel (cup ?) colourless slight yellow 111-IV Oescus 58 .0ES Fragment of window glass colourless 111-IV Oescus 59.0ES Fragment of window glass colourless slight green 111-IV Oescus 60.0ES Glass from glassmelting tub colourless slight yellow 11-IV Oescus 61.0ES Glass from glassmelting tub slight blue-greenish 11-IV Oescus 62.VAR Fragment of unguentarium colourless 11-111 Varna in the form of a bell 63.VAR Fragment of vessel (cup ?) colourless 11-111 Varna 64.VAR Fragment of unguentarium green 1-11 Varna 65.VAR Fragment of unguentarium colourless slight yellow 11-111 nearVarna 66.VAR Fragment of bottle-flask colourless slight yellow 111-IV Varna 67.VAR Fragment of unguentarium colourless III Varna 68.VAR Fragment of unguentarium colourless III Varna in the form of a ball 69.VAR Fragment of jug (ionohoe) colourless slight greenish III Varna 70.VAR Fragment of unguentarium colourless IV-VI Varna 71.VAR Fragment of unguentarium colourless 11-111 Varna in the form of a bell 72 .KAL Fragment of wheel beaker slight greenish IV-VI Kaliakra 73 .KAL Fragment of window glass slight yellowish IV-VI Kaliakra 74.ARM Fragment of window glass colourless slight yellowish 11-IV Armira 75 .ARM Fragment of window glass colourless slight yellowish 11 -IV Armira 76.ARM Fragment of window glass colourless 11-IV Armira 77.ARM Fragment of window glass colourless blueish 11-IV Armira 78.ARM Fragment of the botom of bottle colourless greenish 11-IV Armira 185 Table 2: Concentration of determined elements (Jlg/g) in investigated samples of Roman glasses Element 52.0ES 53.0ES 54.0ES 56.0ES 57 .0ES Al 203 (%) 2.61 ±0.08 2.15±0.25 2.06±0.34 2.31 ±0.06 2.32±0.08 As 242±5 <4 14±2 5±1 <4 Ba 67±3 660±50 417±40 390±80 240±180 Br 9.3±1 .9 1.9±0.5 2.4±0.4 2.1 ±0.3 3.9±0.8 CaO (%) 5.81 ±0.32 7.22±0.84 6.41 ±0.50 8.27±0.50 7.56±0.75 Ce 16.6±1 .6 15.5±1 .6 95.0±1.5 11 .6±1.1 13.2±1.7 Cl(%) 0.87±0.09 1.93±0.23 0.20±0.19 2.60±0.45 2.51 ±0.43 Co 11 .5±1 .8 4.0±0.5 16.6±0.8 3.0±0.5 6.0±0.3 Cr 16±5 19±3 81 ±4 11 ±4 12±3 Cs 0.26±0.06 < 0.1 0.70±0.09 0.25±0.09 0.55±0.08 Cu 6410±520 130±20 330±50 220±30 215±30 Dy <3 4.0±1.0 3.0±1 .0 2.0±1 .5 2.3± 1.1 Eu 0.13±0.02 0.66±0.08 1.43±0.18 0.58±0.06 0.46±0.09 Fe 203 (%) 0.99±0.03 0.59±0.03 5.58±0.13 0.41 ±0.03 0.46±0.03 Hf 2.1±0.2 1.3±0.2 5.9±0.2 1.3±0.1 1.3±0.2 K20 (%) 0.9±0.1 0.8±0.1 0.9±0.1 0.5±0.1 0.9±0.1 La 13.8±1.5 8.7±0.4 41 .3±1.9 6.2±0.6 5.9±0.6 Lu 0.11 ±0.03 0.46±0.04 0.23±0.04 0.08±0.02 Mgü (%) 0.44±0.03 0.52±0.03 1.93±0.03 0.79±0.03 0.54±0.03 Mn 2730±40 1480±140 11520±440 2160±30 4250±130 Na20 (%) 23.6±0.5 21 .5±0.3 21 .5±0.4 22.6±0.3 21 .6±0.8 Nd 7±2 4±1 41 ±2 30±2 34±3 Rb < 20 45±6 125±9 18±4 35±5 Sb 122±8 2500±40 3.2±0.1 2960±50 2000±30 Sc 1.7±0.3 1.5±0.1 15.0±0.5 1.1 ±0.1 1.2±0.1 Sm 2.1 ±0.1 1.5±0.1 8.3±0.2 1.2±0.2 1.3±0.1 Ta 0.11±0.03 0.11±0.03 0.09±0.04 1.10±0.08 1.14±0.09 Th 1.6±0.1 1.4±0.3 14.4±0.4 0.6±0.2 0.5±0.2 Ti 840±120 660±140 4020±420 480± 160 410±160 V 26 .1 ±4.6 15 .2±1.7 120±5 13.6±2.9 25 .1±1.4 Yb 0.9±0.1 0.6±0.1 3.3±0.2 < 0.6 <0.5 186 Table 2: (continuation) Element 58 .0ES 59.0ES 60 .0ES 61.0ES 62.VAR Al 203 (%) 2.02±0.17 2.15±0.06 2.26±0.11 2.31 ±0.06 1.93±0.06 As <4 <4 <3 <3 <6 Ba 350±40 640±50 280±90 480± 70 760±60 Br 1.7±0.6 3.3±0.5 3.3 ±0.6 3.8±0.5 1.5 ±0.5 CaO (%) 7.48±0.55 7.36±0.53 7.52±0.54 7.98±0.54 5.73±0.36 Ce 10.5±1 .1 13.3±0.7 14.7±0.5 16.0±0.6 5.3±1 .3 Cl(%) 1.83±0.38 2.39±0.40 2.63±0.44 2.47±0.42 2.80±0.19 Co 2.2±0.5 4.2±0.1 5.4±0.2 4.8±0.2 2.2±0.3 Cr 8±1 9±1 13±1 12±1 14±1 Cs 0.25±0.08 0.52±0.05 0.86±0.07 0.91 ±0.09 0.53±0.07 Cu 162±45 150±50 200± 70 200±60 400±90 Dy 2.3±0.4 2.3±0.4 2.0±0.4 1.9±0.4 2.0±0.4 Eu 0.57±0.05 0.50±0.06 0.82±0.12 0.93±0.12 0.59±0.09 Fe203 (%) 0.36±0.04 0.50±0.03 0.44±0.04 0.49±0.03 0.23±0.02 Hf 1.6±0.1 0.9±0.3 1.6±0.2 1.7±0.2 1.4±0.2 K20 (%) 0.6±0.1 0.7±0.1 0.6±0.1 0.5±0.1 <0.5 La 6.6±0.4 6.0±0.6 6.9±0.5 4.4±0.4 6.4±0.4 Lu 0.11±0.04 0.45±0.05 0.23±0.04 0.08±0.02 MgO (%) 0.41 ±0.03 0.58±0.02 0.53±0.03 0.44±0.06 0.36±0.02 Mn 174±20 1950±50 2020±40 2080±40 105±20 Na20 (%) 22 .9±0.4 21.6±0.8 22.2±0.5 21 .3±0.8 23 .7±0.9 Nd 10±2 9±1 12±1 6±2 8±1 Rb 70±8 <5 33±5 12±1 40±5 Sb 4420±50 2470± 70 3110±90 2400±80 5300±80 Sc 1.0±0.1 1.2±0.1 1.2±0.1 1.2±0.1 0.6±0.1 Sm 1.3±0.1 1.1 ±0.1 1.4±0.2 0.7±0.1 1.2±0.1 Ta 0.07±0.01 <0.04 0.14±0.01 0.25±0.03 <0.05
Recommended publications
  • Reflections of Roman Imperialisms
    Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Edited by Marko A. Janković and Vladimir D. Mihajlović Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Edited by Marko A. Janković and Vladimir D. Mihajlović This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Marko A. Janković, Vladimir D. Mihajlović and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0625-8 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0625-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations .................................................................................... vii List of Tables ............................................................................................... x Reflecting Roman Imperialisms .................................................................. 1 Vladimir D. Mihajlović & Marko A. Janković Lost and (re)found? The Biography of Some Apparently Roman Artefacts in Ireland .................................................................................... 30 Michael Ann Bevivino Rural Society on the Edge of Empire: Copper Alloy Vessels in Roman Britain Reported through the Portable Antiquities Scheme ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Vama Romană De La Capidava
    VAMA ROMANĂ DE LA CAPIDAVA 1 AUTORI: Două inscripții cunoscute de mai multă vreme Cunoaștem însă alte câteva stationes atestate unui nou birou de vamă la vărsarea râului Axios în cetății, pe latura de N-V, deasupra temeliei, reutilizată menționează un birou vamal (statio portorii) și implicit expressis verbis pe cale epigrafică pentru Moesia Dunăre. În sfârșit, un birou vamal a funcționat cu ca material de construcție într-o epocă mai târzie. Ioan Carol Opriș Universitatea din București un important punct comercial la Capidava pentru sec. Inferior, în afara celei de la Capidava. Urcând pe cursul siguranță la Tyras, iar relațiile cu locuitorii cetății nu IMAGINEA 2 . Monumentul a fost ridicat cândva în ultima Alexandru Raţiu II-III p.Chr. Acest birou se afla în responsabilitatea unui Dunării, existența lor este asigurată în vecinătatea au fost dintre cele mai fericite în secolul al II-lea, parte a domniei împăratului Antoninus Pius (cca 155- Muzeul Național de Istorie conductor, iar mai apoi cea a unui procurator, pentru lagărului legionar la Durostorum și, iarăși, la Dimum, necesitând intervenția repetată a legaților provinciali 161). Personajul în cinstea căruia se ridică monumentul a României ultimii ani de domnie ai lui Antoninus Pius, respectiv Oescus, Ostrovo. Foarte probabil unul funcționa și la ai Moesiei Inferior. este unul de mare notorietate în întreaga regiune, T. din timpul sau chiar după Marcus Aurelius (ISM V 10; 12 Novae, iar în interiorul provinciei alte câteva epigrafe Iulius Saturninus. El ocupă în această vreme poziția = Capidava I, 12; 8). Ambele piese au fost descoperite pot indica birouri vamale și la Nicopolis ad Istrum, ori Prima epigrafă este un altar onorific din calcar (ISM conductor al unei părți din marele district vamal, pe de către Grigore Florescu, la începutul cercetărilor Montana IMAGINEA 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Commagenorum
    CASTELUL DE LA CAPUT STENARUM ŞI COHORS I FLAVIA COMMAGENORUM Cristian SCHUSTER* Fortificaţia de la Boiţa/Caput Stenarum Înainte de a părăsi Transilvania, Oltul face un unghi de aproape 90 de grade, pornind apoi spre sud, prin Carpaţii Meridionali, devenind ulterior „graniţa” dintre Oltenia şi Muntenia. Chiar în dreptul respectivului cot, pe malul drept al râului, investigaţiile arheologice au permis descoperirea resturilor unei fortificaţii romane. Acestea, aflate în punctul cunoscut sub denumirea În Rude (fig. 1), se găsesc astăzi pe teritoriul satului Boiţa (oraşul Tălmaciu, judeţul Sibiu)1. Aşa cum se ştie, cei mai mulţi dintre specialişti consideră că în acest sat trebuie localizat ceea ce Tabula Peutingeriana indică a fi Caput Stenarum2. Prezenţa urmelor romane a fost semnalată încă de la sfârşitul veacului al XIX-lea - începutul celui următor3. Primele cercetări arheologice s-au derulat în 19574, fiind continuate în 19585, 19736, 19797 şi, în cadrul practicii arheologice a studenţilor de la Facultatea de Filologie-Istorie din Sibiu, în vara anului 19818. Fortificaţiei, prin dimensiunile sale reduse – „de 46 x 47 m, fiind, deci, aproape pătrată”9, i se potriveşte mai degrabă termenul de castellum decât cel de castrum. Cu privire la momentul ridicării fortificaţiei din piatră, dar şi a „termelor cu palestrele, tabulariului vămii şi construcţiile cu caracter gospodăresc” s-a emis ipoteza că ele au fost realizate „după anii 167-169 e.n., când s-a operat reorganizarea administrativă şi militară de către Marcus Aurelius”10. Spre această concluzie * Institutul de Arheologie „Vasile Pârvan” - Centrul de Tracologie, Bucureşti; e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Ghinea 1998. Despre denumirea În Rude a punctului, vezi: Albescu 1938, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Antiqua Et Archaeologica Xvii (2011)
    UNIVERSITÉ „AL. I. CUZA” I A Ş I FACULTÉ D’HISTOIRE SÉMINAIRE ET CHAIRE D’HISTOIRE ANCIENNE ET D’ARCHÉOLOGIE CENTRE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE DʹÉTUDES ARCHÉOHISTORIQUES STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA XVII (2011) EDITURA UNIVERSITĂȚII „ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA” IAŞI ‐ 2011 COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE: Lucrețiu Mihailescu‐Bîrliba (rédacteur en chef) (Iaşi) Acad. Prof. Mircea Petrescu‐Dîmbovița (Iaşi) Acad. Victor Spinei (Iaşi) Nicolae Ursulescu (Iaşi) Attila László (Iaşi) Svend Hansen (Berlin) Martin Hose (München) Christoph Schäfer (Trier) Wolfgang Schuller (Konstanz) Olivier Weller (Paris) Gocha R. Tsetskhladze (Melbourne) Alexader Falileyev (Aberystwyth) Ion Sandu (Iaşi) Alexander Rubel (Iaşi) Adrian Poruciuc (Iaşi) COMITÉ DE RÉDACTION Roxana‐Gabriela Curcă (secrétariat de rédaction) Marius Alexianu, Neculai Bolohan, Octavian Bounegru, Iulia Dumitrache (membres). La responsabilité du contenu scientifique et sur la forme des articles revient intégralement aux auteurs. Les manuscrits, les livres et les revues proposés en échange et pour comptes‐rendus, ainsi que toute la correspondance seront adressés à la Redaction: Universitatea “Al.I. Cuza”, Facultatea de Istorie, Catedra de Istorie Veche şi Arheologie, Bulevardul Carol I, no.11, 700506 – Iaşi, Roumanie. Tel. 032/201614; Fax. 0040.32.201201; 0040.32.201156 E‐mail: sem‐[email protected] ISSN 1224‐2284 SOMMAIRE‐CONTENTS Geophysical Prospecting Techniques Used in Archaeology. Magnetometry ANDREI ASĂNDULESEI ……………………………………………….. 5 Aşezarea din perioada bronzului târziu de la Negrileşti, jud. Galați ADRIAN ADAMESCU, COSTEL ILIE …………………………..….… 19 Documents officiels concernant les prix et les taxes des produits romains à base de poisson IULIA DUMITRACHE …………………………………………….…… 49 Building God’s Dwelling Place. Synagogues And Houses Of Prayer In Anatolia And Eastern Europe During The Roman Period IULIAN MOGA ......................................................................................... 65 La cité romaine du Haut‐Empire D’Ibida (Mésie Inférieure).
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Defence Sites on the Danube River and Environmental Changes
    Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XIII 563 Roman defence sites on the Danube River and environmental changes D. Constantinescu Faculty Material’s Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Romania Abstract There are many things to learn from the past regarding ancient settlements, the ancient organization of cities, the structures of the buildings and concerning the everyday life of our ancestors. There are numerous sites along the Danube River which were once included in the economic and defensive system of the Roman Empire. Many of them are not well known today or studies are in their very early stages. Sucidava is an example of a Daco-Roman historical defence site, situated on the north bank of the Danube. The ancient heritage site covers more than two hectares; comprising the Roman-Byzantine basilica of the 4th century, the oldest place of worship north of the Danube, the building containing the hypocaust dates from the late 6th century AD, Constantine the Great portal bridge, to span the Danube river, the gates linking the bridge and city, a Roman fountain dating from the 2nd century AD. This entire defensive and communication system stands as a testimony to the complexity of an historical conception. However, how was it possible that such sophisticated structures have been partially or totally destroyed? Certainly not only economic and military aspects might be a likely explanation. The present article considers the evolution of the sites from cultural ecology point of view, as well as taking into consideration environmental and climatic changes. Doubtless, the overall evolution of this site is not singular.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimitar Ignatov Project Coordinator CEO Iwalk.Bg Euroregion Pleven-Olt Association Area: 4 333 Km² Population: 269 760 11 Municipalities Art
    Digitization of historical sites in Bulgaria Patra, 17/03/2018 Svetlana Dimitrova-Sotirova Expert: Dimitar Ignatov Project Coordinator CEO iwalk.bg Euroregion Pleven-Olt Association Area: 4 333 km² Population: 269 760 11 Municipalities Art. 1 of EUROPEAN CONVENTION for preservation of archaeological heritage defines the term „archaeological heritage” –collection of "all remains and objects, as well as other traces of mankind from past epochs", whose preservation and exploration supports "the tracking of the history of mankind and its relation to the natural environment”. The main sources of information are "excavations or finds, as well as other methods for the study of mankind and the related environment". Archaeological Heritage "includes structures, buildings, groups of buildings, objects, movable and other monuments, and their context, whether on land or under water." Bulgaria owns treasures so deeply hidden even for the most enthusiastic tourists or historians. Such an example is Ulpia Oescus – forgotten ancient Romanian town, central town of the Roman province Moesia Inferior, which remains were found near village of Gigen, District of Pleven. Ulpia Oescus one of the largest and significant towns in the Lower Danube region during the Roman era (II–IV AD), which nowadays is part of the world cultural and historical heritage. The News from 01.09.2016 „Fire burned the ancient town Ulpia Oescus near village of Gigen. According to the head of archeological research, part of the damages can not be restored.“ 3D laser scanning of part of Ulipa Ouescus 3D Interactive Map What is IWALK BG? Idea Vision Innovation 1 2 3D graphics with underlined tale 3 Unified multimedia platform offering: The platform gathers together all the information that tourists need for a style and practically unlimited .
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraficeiscylptyral1
    MONVMENTELE EPIGRAFICEISCYLPTYRAL1 ALE -AryzEviNT NATIONAL DE ANTICHITATI DIN BVCVRETI PVBLICATE SVI3 AVSPICIILE ACADEMIEI ROMANE DE GR.G. TOCILESCV Membru al Academiei Romano, al Institutelor archeologice din Roma si Viena, al Sccietiltilor archeologice din Paris, Orleans, Bruxelles, Roma, Atena, Odesa gi Moscova, al Societatii geografice, numismaticei istorice din Bucuresti, al Societatii istorice din Moscova, al Societatii de etnograflesiantropologie din Paris, etc., Vice-preseclinte al Ateneului Roman, Prof..la Universitatea din Bucuresti, Director al Muzeului national de antichitati, etc. 1 PARTEA II COLECTIVNEA SCVLPTVRALA. A MVZEVLVI PA.N.A. IN ANVL 1881. IBUCURETI NOIJA TIPOGRAFIE PROFESIONALA DIM. C. IONESCIT io.-STRADA SELARE. Jo. r 1908 a ..NicoLAe BALCESCU" PARTEA II MONVMENTELE SCVLPTVRALI I RELIEFURI ANTICE N.. 1 Capul in relief al unui rege al Assyriei, (pate Aur- nasir-pal), sail al until resbornic assyrian. Relieful oblu neinfatiseza,intr'omarime superiors Desoriptinnea. naturel, capul until rege al Assyriel, pate al lul Aur- nasir- pal, sail al unui resboinic assyrian. Perul capulul este acoperit pang la frunte§icefa de o legatura fa'cuta in chip de tichie §i fixata cu o curea latti pe dupa, urechY. Barba cea lungs, ca ipletele lasate pe spate, sunt frisate in carliontl. Monumentul provine din ruinele anticuluY ora§ Niniveh,Proveninta unde a fost gasit de d. Cocio Cohen impreuna cu fragmentul din inscriptiunea analelor lul A§ur-nasir-pal, regale Assyriel, publicat inacesta opera sub nr. 97 (pag. 479)§i avand aceia§1 proveninta 1). Faptul acesta al unel proveninteco- 1) Proveninta dela Niniveh a ambelor monumente se atesti prin raportul nr. 13 din 12 Maiti 1869 adresat Ministerukil instructiunki publice de clitre con- servatorul Musgulul de AntichitAtI.
    [Show full text]
  • Harttimo 1.Pdf
    Beyond the River, under the Eye of Rome Ethnographic Landscapes, Imperial Frontiers, and the Shaping of a Danubian Borderland by Timothy Campbell Hart A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Greek and Roman History) in the University of Michigan 2017 Doctoral Committee: Professor David S. Potter, Co-Chair Professor Emeritus Raymond H. Van Dam, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Ian David Fielding Professor Christopher John Ratté © Timothy Campbell Hart [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8640-131X For my family ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Developing and writing a dissertation can, at times, seem like a solo battle, but in my case, at least, this was far from the truth. I could not have completed this project without the advice and support of many individuals, most crucially, my dissertation co-chairs David S. Potter, and Raymond Van Dam. Ray saw some glimmer of potential in me and worked to foster it from the moment I arrived at Michigan. I am truly thankful for his support throughout the years and constant advice on both academic and institutional matters. In particular, our conversations about demographics and the movement of people in the ancient world were crucial to the genesis of this project. Throughout the writing process, Ray’s firm encouragement towards clarity of argument and style, while not always what I wanted to hear, have done much to make this a stronger dissertation. David Potter has provided me with a lofty academic model towards which to strive. I admire the breadth and depth of his scholarship; working and teaching with him have shown me much worth emulating.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Legions: a Page of the Roman Numismatic Gallery (
    Roman Legions: A Page of the Roman Numismatic Gallery (www.romancoins.info) Legion Caesar Augustus Tiberius Claudius Nero Vespasian Domitian Trajan Hadrian M. Aurel SepSev 300 AD I Adiutrix . Misenium 68 Mogontiacum Mogontiacu Brigetio 97 Brigetio Brigetio Brigetio Brigetio Galba 69/70 m 85 Dacia Camp (Otho) Sirmium 89 Parthia Bodriacum ? bis 97 Camp 114-6 I Augusta Hispania Col Agrippi Bonna Bonna 69/70 Germanica Gallia 19 BC - 16 Col Agrippina (Germanicus 9 AD - Bonna 16 - I Italica 66 Gallia Novae 69 Novae Novae Novae Novae Novae Novae Cisalp Dcia Camp 68 Lugdunum (Vitellius) I Minerva Bonna 82 Moesien Bonna Bonna -161 Bonna Bonna Dacia Camp Orient 161- Bonna 105 166 Bonna 167- I Parthica Singara (Mesopotam) II Adiutrix 69 Ravenna Deva Dacia Aquincum Aquincum Aquincum Aquincum Noviomagus -86/88 101-106 70 Singidunum Aquincum Orient 161- Lindum (Brit) 87-89 106 166 70/71-78 Aquincum 89 II Augusta 43 BC 17 Britannia 43 Glevum Glevum Isca Isca Isca Isca Isca Isca CVibius Pansa Argentorate (Vespasianus) (Gloucester) -75 (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) 30 BC (Germanicus 67- 75 - Hispania T 9AD Rhein II Italica Aquilea 165 Lauriacum Lauriacum Locica 170-2 Albing 172-2 Lauriacum 205 II Parthica 197 Alba 202 Alba (Rom) Parther (Caracalla) II Traiana 105 125 Nicopolis Nicopolis Nicopolis Laodicea Nicopolis Legion Caesar Augustus Tiberius Claudius Nero Vespasian Domitian Trajan Hadrian M. Aurel SepSev 300 AD 114-116 (Aegypten) Parther 117 Judea (Ägypten) III Augusta 43 BC Ammaedra Ammaedra Ammaedra Ammaedra
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Role of the Roman Army in the Province of Lower Moesia (Moesia Inferior) INSTITUTE of EUROPEAN CULTURE ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY in POZNAŃ
    Economic role of the Roman army in the province of Lower Moesia (Moesia Inferior) INSTITUTE OF EUROPEAN CULTURE ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY IN POZNAŃ ACTA HUMANISTICA GNESNENSIA VOL. XVI ECONOMIC ROLE OF THE ROMAN ARMY IN THE PROVINCE OF LOWER MOESIA (MOESIA INFERIOR) Michał Duch This books takes a comprehensive look at the Roman army as a factor which prompted substantial changes and economic transformations in the province of Lower Moesia, discussing its impact on the development of particular branches of the economy. The volume comprises five chapters. Chapter One, entitled “Before Lower Moesia: A Political and Economic Outline” consti- tutes an introduction which presents the economic circumstances in the region prior to Roman conquest. In Chapter Two, entitled “Garrison of the Lower Moesia and the Scale of Militarization”, the author estimates the size of the garrison in the province and analyzes the influence that the military presence had on the demography of Lower Moesia. The following chapter – “Monetization” – is concerned with the financial standing of the Roman soldiery and their contri- bution to the monetization of the province. Chapter Four, “Construction”, addresses construction undertakings on which the army embarked and the outcomes it produced, such as urbanization of the province, sustained security and order (as envisaged by the Romans), expansion of the economic market and exploitation of the province’s natural resources. In the final chapter, entitled “Military Logistics and the Local Market”, the narrative focuses on selected aspects of agriculture, crafts and, to a slightly lesser extent, on trade and services. The book demonstrates how the Roman army, seeking to meet its provisioning needs, participated in and contributed to the functioning of these industries.
    [Show full text]
  • FL. MATEI-POPESCU Cu Corecturi.Indd
    https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Florian Matei-Popescu THE ROMAN ARMY IN MOESIA INFERIOR https://biblioteca-digitala.ro “VASILE PÂRVAN” INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF ROMANIAN HISTORY THE CENTRE FOR ROMAN MILITARY STUDIES 7 Series editors: OVIDIU ŢENTEA FLORIAN MATEI-POPESCU https://biblioteca-digitala.ro FLORIAN MATEI-POPESCU THE ROMAN ARMY IN MOESIA INFERIOR CONPHYS PUBLISHING HOUSE Bucharest, 2010 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Th is volume is printed in the framework of the STRATEG Project – PNCDI II, P4, 91 010/ 2007, fi nanced by the National Authority for Scientifi c Research (ANCS). General editors: Ovidiu Ţentea and Florian Matei-Popescu Cover design: Andrei Cîmpeanu © Florian Matei-Popescu & CRMS First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the publishers and editors. Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României MATEI-POPESCU, FLORIAN Th e Roman Army in Moesia Inferior Florian Matei-Popescu. – Bucureşti : Conphys, 2010 ISBN 978-973-750-177-6 Edited and printed by CONPHYS Romania, Râmnicu Vâlcea www.conphys.ro https://biblioteca-digitala.ro To Valentina and Ilinca https://biblioteca-digitala.ro https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Contents Foreword 9 Author’s preface 11 List of abbreviations 13 Introduction 19 I. Legio V Macedonica 35 1. Legion history prior the establishment of the province of Moesia Inferior 35 2. Legion history between 86 and 167 45 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Space and Identity in Roman Moesia
    Space and Identity in Roman Moesia Space and Identity in Roman Moesia: Rethinking Military and Civilian Spheres in a Frontier Province Lina Diers Defining military and civilian spheres in the Roman province of Moesia is no easy task. Although the province’s numerous military structures along the Danube Limes (fortified but permeable frontier) and in its inland are well-known, there is certainly some confusion when it comes to the embedment of these structures within Moesia’s settlement patterns and particularly their civilian factor. On one hand, epigraphic evidence attests to the common frontier province phenomenon of so-called settlement dualism of canabae (settlement structure featuring soldiers’ families and supply units alongside legionary camps and auxiliary forts) and vici (village/civilian settlement structure ranging between urban and rural character) in all the major legionary camp sites of Moesia. On the other, the state of archaeological research in Moesia does not (or not yet) allow a distinct location or spatial separation of canabae and vici at most sites. Instead, the site conditions rather display surprising degrees of mixing military and civilian administration and living spheres contradicting the concept of settlement dualism. By introducing several examples for this situation, this article discusses if it is useful or even necessary in current modes of post-processual, post/-anti-colonial and identity- oriented discourse in Roman Archaeology to spatially divide military and civilian spheres in clarifying everyday life reality and settlement patterns in Roman Moesia. Institute for European and Mediterranean Archaeology 1 Lina Diers Introduction area. While the legionary deployments and their consequences at the very beginning The Roman province of Moesia was founded of Roman presence in the Balkans are still in the period between 15 and 45 C.E.
    [Show full text]