DOCSLIB.ORG

FL. MATEI-POPESCU Cu Corecturi.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FL. MATEI-POPESCU Cu Corecturi.Indd https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Florian Matei-Popescu THE ROMAN ARMY IN MOESIA INFERIOR https://biblioteca-digitala.ro “VASILE PÂRVAN” INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF ROMANIAN HISTORY THE CENTRE FOR ROMAN MILITARY STUDIES 7 Series editors: OVIDIU ŢENTEA FLORIAN MATEI-POPESCU https://biblioteca-digitala.ro FLORIAN MATEI-POPESCU THE ROMAN ARMY IN MOESIA INFERIOR CONPHYS PUBLISHING HOUSE Bucharest, 2010 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Th is volume is printed in the framework of the STRATEG Project – PNCDI II, P4, 91 010/ 2007, fi nanced by the National Authority for Scientifi c Research (ANCS). General editors: Ovidiu Ţentea and Florian Matei-Popescu Cover design: Andrei Cîmpeanu © Florian Matei-Popescu & CRMS First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the publishers and editors. Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României MATEI-POPESCU, FLORIAN Th e Roman Army in Moesia Inferior Florian Matei-Popescu. – Bucureşti : Conphys, 2010 ISBN 978-973-750-177-6 Edited and printed by CONPHYS Romania, Râmnicu Vâlcea www.conphys.ro https://biblioteca-digitala.ro To Valentina and Ilinca https://biblioteca-digitala.ro https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Contents Foreword 9 Author’s preface 11 List of abbreviations 13 Introduction 19 I. Legio V Macedonica 35 1. Legion history prior the establishment of the province of Moesia Inferior 35 2. Legion history between 86 and 167 45 3. Prosopography of V Macedonica legion while stationed in Moesia Inferior 53 4. Withdrawal of the legion from Dacia and its quartering at Oescus 75 5. Stamps of legion V Macedonica while stationed in Moesia Inferior 75 II. Legio I Italica 77 1. Legion establishment and history prior displacement on the territory of Moesia 77 2. I Italica legion at Novae 79 3. Prosopography of I Italica legion 88 4. Stamps of I Italica legion 122 III. Legio XI Claudia pia fi delis 125 1. History of XI Claudia legion prior displacement to Moesia Inferior 125 2. Displacement of XI Claudia legion in Moesia Inferior and its subsequent history 133 3. Prosopography of XI Claudia legion while stationed in Moesia Inferior 141 4. Stamps of XI Claudia legion 163 IV. Auxilia 167 1. Alae 167 2. Cohortes 193 3. Numeri 237 4. Conclusions 239 V. Classis Flavia Moesica 245 1. History of the classis Flavia Moesica 245 2. Prosopography of classis Flavia Moesica 249 Addendum I. Th e involvement of Moesia Inferior army in Trajan’s Dacian war 257 Addendum II. Vexillationes of Moesia Inferior composed of several or unmentioned units 271 Conclusions 275 Select bibliography 285 Tables 291 Index of ancient and modern place names 319 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Foreword A decade ago, I proposed Florian Matei-Popescu, young graduate of the Faculty of History with the University of Bucharest, to prepare an advanced studies (MA) thesis on the auxiliary units from Moesia Inferior. Th e author agreed that the history of the Roman army is a research fi eld that clearly would never be exhausted, as new discoveries and studies of military history would persistently come to its completion. Th e result was an excellent study, which I immediately proposed for issue to SCIVA journal (52–53, 2001–2002, p. 173–242). Almost concurrently, I edited a book on the auxiliary units from Roman Dacia (Auxilia Daciae. Contribuţie la istoria militară a Daciei romane, Bucharest, 2002). Th e sudden large amount of military diplomas, many coming from the Danubian provinces, aided to a constant update of troops’ repertoire from Dacia and Moesia. Th e scientifi c expertise of the young researcher encouraged me to propose the draft of a doctoral thesis on the Roman army from Moesia Inferior. Additionally, the ampleness and subject tackled by Fl. Matei-Popescu were novel. Th e historical specialty literature included insofar partial approaches. Th us, the Bulgarian scholar Bogdan Filow published a book entitled Die Legionen der Provinz Moesia von Augustus bis auf Diokletian (Klio, Beiheft VI, Leipzig, 1906). After seven decades, a new synthesis would be drawn up: Andrei Aricescu, Armata în Dobrogea romană (Bucharest, 1977); as per the title, the book discussed the military forces – legions and auxiliaries – from a certain area, in truth, the most important of the limes (the Romanian sector of the Danube), including however signifi cant references to the history of the entire province; moreover, the book presents the history of the military defence of this territory in late Roman period, when the region formed the province of Scythia, resulted following the division of Moesia Inferior. Obviously, epigraphic fi nds and general studies of Roman military history went beyond this book. On July 6, 2009, Fl. Matei-Popescu defended his thesis with the Faculty of History, in the presence of a demanding board formed of professors Alexandru Barnea, Ioan Piso and Alexandru Suceveanu. Upon commendatory appreciations in both my evaluation, drafted as scientifi c supervisor and that of the three reviewers, the candidate was awarded the title of doctor in history, summa cum laude. Parallel to the thesis preparation, Fl. Matei Popescu attended the courses of the Department of Classical Languages with the University of Bucharest, which confers him an unfortunately unenviable standing of rara avis in a world dominated by shallowness and desire for easy success. 9 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro I shall not detail herein the content of this book, as the author himself does at length and better. It is absolutely notable that this book is published in an international language, thus concurring to its large dissemination within scholar environments. Additionally to the author, I believe this book contributes to a Military History of Moesia; such title extension encloses the hope that another researcher, maybe even Fl. Matei Popescu, shall prepare a history of the Roman army from Moesia Superior. However, the military history in question should comprise other considerations as well: organization of the defensive system (limes) by the Lower Danube; the weaponry of the Roman soldiers from Moesia; the religion of the soldiers from the two provinces of Moesia; the monetary circulation in the forts from the Moesian limes; the wares in the Roman forts on the limes; the daily life in the forts on the Moesian limes etc. Fl. Matei-Popescu’s book would hopefully inaugurate such a series. Its forthcoming compels us to leave aside other concerns and proceed with the draft of a Roman army history from Dacia. I express no doubts that the book will be welcomed by the researchers of the Roman military history. Nevertheless, upon the book issue, the author must recognize he is only at the beginning of a road, of a life dedicated to science. His work is like a monumental edifi ce, whose construction the architect alludes himself to fi nish even if by the end of his life. On various occasions, I was glad to hear my colleagues some, ones of the most demanding professionals, saying that Fl. Matei-Popescu is one of the most remarkable representatives of his generation. I am happy that some of them were my students, some drafting doctoral thesis to my suggestion and supervision. I believe their involvement in historical research shall endure more than my few historical opera. Fl. Matei-Popescu has many reasons to be happy. Even in diffi cult times like these, he earned a respected place in a prestigious institution like the Institute of Archaeology in Bucharest. His joy grew this spring, when his adorable daughter Ilinca was born. Let him remember that his accomplishments are due to the Divine Grace and let him ask everyday our Lord for health and effi ciency. Constantin C. Petolescu 10 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Author’s Preface Th is book is the adapted version of my doctoral thesis of same title, which I defended with the Faculty of History of the University of Bucharest on July 6, 2009. It is a paper of Roman military history based on a historical and prosopographic study of the Roman army by the Lower Danube, where the Roman province of Moesia was established under Augustus; during Domitian’s rule, the province would be divided into Moesia Superior and Moesia Inferior. Archaeological matters were only partially tackled therein. Where existing, archaeological data on the discussed period were mentioned, however I did not wish to produce a separate chapter for the military archaeology of the province. Th e theme was suggested to me by Professor Constantin C. Petolescu. Firstly, I prepared a monographic study on the province auxilia within the MA programme of the same Faculty, later issued by SCIVA journal (52–53, 2001–2002, p. 173–242). I was then advised to extend the research to the entire Roman army of the province, in the form of a doctoral thesis. Th e result is this book. Th e book has also been one of my research themes with “Vasile Pârvan” Institute of Archaeology, the oldest relevant institution in Romania, where I am glad to be a part. I wish to thank the entire to my friends and colleagues from the Institute and for the still existing environment of true scientifi c emulation. Th e translation into English was provided by Gabriela Safta, to whom I would like to thank for a very fruitful collaboration during the past year. I wish to thank the members of my doctoral panel, Professors Alexandru Barnea, Ioan Piso and Alexandru Suceveanu, for their remarks and suggestions. My acknowledgments also go to Professor Mircea Babeş, who, within “Vasile Pârvan” Archaeology Seminar, has fi nanced a research stay with the University of Cologne, in 2002.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reflections of Roman Imperialisms
    Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Edited by Marko A. Janković and Vladimir D. Mihajlović Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Edited by Marko A. Janković and Vladimir D. Mihajlović This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Marko A. Janković, Vladimir D. Mihajlović and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0625-8 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0625-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations .................................................................................... vii List of Tables ............................................................................................... x Reflecting Roman Imperialisms .................................................................. 1 Vladimir D. Mihajlović & Marko A. Janković Lost and (re)found? The Biography of Some Apparently Roman Artefacts in Ireland .................................................................................... 30 Michael Ann Bevivino Rural Society on the Edge of Empire: Copper Alloy Vessels in Roman Britain Reported through the Portable Antiquities Scheme ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Romanization of Romania: a Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage Colleen Ann Lovely Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2016 The Romanization of Romania: A Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage Colleen Ann Lovely Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Lovely, Colleen Ann, "The Romanization of Romania: A Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage" (2016). Honors Theses. 178. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/178 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Romanization of Romania: A Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage By Colleen Ann Lovely ********* Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Departments of Classics and Anthropology UNION COLLEGE March 2016 Abstract LOVELY, COLLEEN ANN The Romanization of Romania: A Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage. Departments of Classics and Anthropology, March 2016. ADVISORS: Professor Stacie Raucci, Professor Robert Samet This thesis looks at the Roman military and how it was the driving force which spread Roman culture. The Roman military stabilized regions, providing protection and security for regions to develop culturally and economically. Roman soldiers brought with them their native cultures, languages, and religions, which spread through their interactions and connections with local peoples and the communities in which they were stationed.
    [Show full text]
  • Halmyris: Geoarchaeology of a Fluvial Harbour on the Danube Delta
    Halmyris: Geoarchaeology of a fluvial harbour on the Danube Delta (Dobrogea, Romania) Matthieu Giaime, Gwenaël Magne, Alexandra Bivolaru, Emmanuel Gandouin, Nick Marriner, Christophe Morhange To cite this version: Matthieu Giaime, Gwenaël Magne, Alexandra Bivolaru, Emmanuel Gandouin, Nick Marriner, et al.. Halmyris: Geoarchaeology of a fluvial harbour on the Danube Delta (Dobrogea, Romania). The Holocene, London: Sage, 2019, 29 (2), pp.313-327. 10.1177/0959683618810397. hal-01950888 HAL Id: hal-01950888 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01950888 Submitted on 14 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Halmyris: Geoarchaeology of a fluvial harbour on the Danube Delta DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683618810397 10.1177/0959683618810397 (Dobrogea, Romania) Matthieu Giaime,1 Gwenaël Magne,2 Alexandra Bivolaru,3 Emmanuel Gandouin,4 Nick Marriner5 and Christophe Morhange3 Abstract In Northern Dobrogea, north of the Dunavăţ promontory, the Roman fortress of Halmyris was founded in the late 1st century AD on a Getic settlement dating to the middle of the 1st millennium BC, probably associated with a Greek emporium of the Classical and Hellenistic periods.
    [Show full text]
  • PAUL at ILLYRICUM, TITUS to DALMATIA: EARLY CHRISTIANITY in the ROMAN ADRIATIC ALBANIA • MONTENEGRO • CROATIA September 20 - October 1, 2020 Tour Host: Dr
    Tutku Travel Programs Endorsed by Biblical Archaeology Society PAUL AT ILLYRICUM, TITUS TO DALMATIA: EARLY CHRISTIANITY IN THE ROMAN ADRIATIC ALBANIA • MONTENEGRO • CROATIA September 20 - October 1, 2020 Tour Host: Dr. Mark Wilson organized by Paul at Illyricum, Titus to Dalmatia: Early Christianity in the Roman Adriatic / September 21-October 1, 2020 Dyrrachium Paul at Illyricum, Titus to Dalmatia: Early Christianity in the Roman Adriatic Mark Wilson, D.Litt. et Phil., Director, Asia Minor Research Center, Antalya, Turkey; Associate Professor Extraordinary of New Testament, Stellenbosch University [email protected] Twice in his letters Paul mentions Christian activity in the Adriatic – Sep 24 Thu Kotor Illyricum (Romans 15:19) and Dalmatia (2 Timothy 4:10). Both were We will cross the border into Montenegro to visit the Roman bridge Roman provinces now located in Albania, Montenegro, and Croatia. We (Adzi-Pasa) at Podgorica; then we’ll visit the Roman site of Budva with will visit numerous Roman sites in these countries as we seek to discover its baths and necropolis; in the afternoon we will tour the old town and early Christian traditions. These traditions are kept alive through the castle at the UNESCO world heritage site of Kotor. Dinner and overnight architecture of majestic Byzantine churches. Several UNESCO World in Kotor. (B, D) Heritage sites await us as we reach them through spectacular natural Sep 25 Fri Dubrovnik scenery. Discover this little-known biblical world as we travel the Diocletian’s Palace, eastern Adriatic together in 2020. Split We will cross the border into Croatia and visit historic Dubrovnik, another UNESCO site and take a Apollonia walking tour of its city walls and old town, Franciscan church and monastery and have free time for a cable car ride with a panoramic overlook.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMAN EMPERORS in POPULAR JARGON: SEARCHING for CONTEMPORARY NICKNAMES (1)1 by CHRISTER BRUUN
    ROMAN EMPERORS IN POPULAR JARGON: SEARCHING FOR CONTEMPORARY NICKNAMES (1)1 By CHRISTER BRUUN Popular culture and opposite views of the emperor How was the reigning Emperor regarded by his subjects, above all by the common people? As is well known, genuine popular sentiments and feelings in antiquity are not easy to uncover. This is why I shall start with a quote from a recent work by Tessa Watt on English 16th-century 'popular culture': "There are undoubtedly certain sources which can bring us closer to ordinary people as cultural 'creators' rather than as creative 'consumers'. Historians are paying increasing attention to records of slanderous rhymes, skimmingtons and other ritualized protests of festivities which show people using established symbols in a resourceful way.,,2 The ancient historian cannot use the same kind of sources, for instance large numbers of cheap prints, as the early modern historian can. 3 But we should try to identify related forms of 'popular culture'. The question of the Roman Emperor's popularity might appear to be a moot one in some people's view. Someone could argue that in a highly 1 TIlls study contains a reworking of only part of my presentation at the workshop in Rome. For reasons of space, only Part (I) of the material can be presented and discussed here, while Part (IT) (' Imperial Nicknames in the Histaria Augusta') and Part (III) (,Late-antique Imperial Nicknames') will be published separately. These two chapters contain issues different from those discussed here, which makes it feasible to create the di vision. The nicknames in the Histaria Augusta are largely literary inventions (but that work does contain fragments from Marius Maximus' imperial biographies, see now AR.
    [Show full text]
  • NP „ KRKA“ Završni Rad
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by VUS Repository VELEUČILIŠTE U ŠIBENIKU ODJEL MENADŽMENTA PREDDIPLOMSKI STRUČNI STUDIJ MENADŽMENT Matea Zelić UPRAVLJANJE ZAŠTIĆENIM PODRUČJIMA, ATRAKCIJSKA OSNOVA I MARKETINŠKA STRATEGIJA – NP „ KRKA“ Završni rad Šibenik, 2017. VELEUČILIŠTE U ŠIBENIKU ODJEL MENADŽMENTA PREDDIPLOMSKI STRUČNI STUDIJ MENADŽMENT UPRAVLJANJE ZAŠTIĆENIM PODRUČJIMA, ATRAKCIJSKA OSNOVA I MARKETINŠKA STRATEGIJA – NP „ KRKA“ Završni rad Kolegij: Upravljanje okolišem Mentor: Mr.sc. Tanja Radić Lakoš Studentica: Matea Zelić Matični broj studenta: 14317131 Šibenik, srpanj 2017. TEMELJNA DOKUMENTACIJSKA KARTICA Veleučilište u Šibeniku Završni rad Odjel: Menadžmenta Preddiplomski stručni studij Menadžment UPRAVLJANJE ZAŠTIĆENIM PODRUČJIMA, ATRAKCIJSKA OSNOVA I MARKETINŠKA STRATEGIJA – NP „ KRKA“ MATEA ZELIĆ Bana Josipa Jelačića 44, [email protected] Područje Nacionalnog parka „Krka“ najposjećenije je i turistički najjače vrednovano zaštićeno područje u Hrvatskoj. Plan upravljanja Nacionalnim parkom „Krka“ rađen je u razdoblju od 2006. do 2010. godine, a neki od dugoročnih ciljeva su očuvanje kakvoće vode rijeke Krke, očuvanje kulturno-povijesne baštine i poboljšanje odnosa sa lokalnim stanovništvom. Ono po čemu se NP „Krka“ ističe je raznolik biljni i životinjski svijet, te je svrstan među najvrijednije prirodne cjeline u Hrvatskoj i Europi. Atrakcijska osnova parka zasniva se na sedam sedrenih barijera i nekoliko srednjovjekovnih utvrda koje se mogu posjetiti tijekom cijele godine.
    [Show full text]
  • Commagenorum
    CASTELUL DE LA CAPUT STENARUM ŞI COHORS I FLAVIA COMMAGENORUM Cristian SCHUSTER* Fortificaţia de la Boiţa/Caput Stenarum Înainte de a părăsi Transilvania, Oltul face un unghi de aproape 90 de grade, pornind apoi spre sud, prin Carpaţii Meridionali, devenind ulterior „graniţa” dintre Oltenia şi Muntenia. Chiar în dreptul respectivului cot, pe malul drept al râului, investigaţiile arheologice au permis descoperirea resturilor unei fortificaţii romane. Acestea, aflate în punctul cunoscut sub denumirea În Rude (fig. 1), se găsesc astăzi pe teritoriul satului Boiţa (oraşul Tălmaciu, judeţul Sibiu)1. Aşa cum se ştie, cei mai mulţi dintre specialişti consideră că în acest sat trebuie localizat ceea ce Tabula Peutingeriana indică a fi Caput Stenarum2. Prezenţa urmelor romane a fost semnalată încă de la sfârşitul veacului al XIX-lea - începutul celui următor3. Primele cercetări arheologice s-au derulat în 19574, fiind continuate în 19585, 19736, 19797 şi, în cadrul practicii arheologice a studenţilor de la Facultatea de Filologie-Istorie din Sibiu, în vara anului 19818. Fortificaţiei, prin dimensiunile sale reduse – „de 46 x 47 m, fiind, deci, aproape pătrată”9, i se potriveşte mai degrabă termenul de castellum decât cel de castrum. Cu privire la momentul ridicării fortificaţiei din piatră, dar şi a „termelor cu palestrele, tabulariului vămii şi construcţiile cu caracter gospodăresc” s-a emis ipoteza că ele au fost realizate „după anii 167-169 e.n., când s-a operat reorganizarea administrativă şi militară de către Marcus Aurelius”10. Spre această concluzie * Institutul de Arheologie „Vasile Pârvan” - Centrul de Tracologie, Bucureşti; e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Ghinea 1998. Despre denumirea În Rude a punctului, vezi: Albescu 1938, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Ephemeris Napocensis
    EPHEMERIS NAPOCENSIS XXIII 2013 ROMANIAN ACADEMY INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY OF ART CLUJ‑NAPOCA EDITORIAL BOARD Editor: Coriolan Horaţiu Opreanu Members: Sorin Cociş, Vlad‑Andrei Lăzărescu, Ioan Stanciu ADVISORY BOARD Alexandru Avram (Le Mans, France); Mihai Bărbulescu (Rome, Italy); Alexander Bursche (Warsaw, Poland); Falko Daim (Mainz, Germany); Andreas Lippert (Vienna, Austria); Bernd Päffgen (Munich, Germany); Marius Porumb (Cluj‑Napoca, Romania); Alexander Rubel (Iași, Romania); Peter Scherrer (Graz, Austria); Alexandru Vulpe (Bucharest, Romania). Responsible of the volume: Ioan Stanciu În ţară revista se poate procura prin poştă, pe bază de abonament la: EDITURA ACADEMIEI ROMÂNE, Calea 13 Septembrie nr. 13, sector 5, P. O. Box 5–42, Bucureşti, România, RO–76117, Tel. 021–411.90.08, 021–410.32.00; fax. 021–410.39.83; RODIPET SA, Piaţa Presei Libere nr. 1, Sector 1, P. O. Box 33–57, Fax 021–222.64.07. Tel. 021–618.51.03, 021–222.41.26, Bucureşti, România; ORION PRESS IMPEX 2000, P. O. Box 77–19, Bucureşti 3 – România, Tel. 021–301.87.86, 021–335.02.96. EPHEMERIS NAPOCENSIS Any correspondence will be sent to the editor: INSTITUTUL DE ARHEOLOGIE ŞI ISTORIA ARTEI Str. M. Kogălniceanu nr. 12–14, 400084 Cluj‑Napoca, RO e‑mail: [email protected] All responsability for the content, interpretations and opinions expressed in the volume belongs exclusively to the authors. DTP şi tipar: MEGA PRINT Coperta: Roxana Sfârlea © 2013 EDITURA ACADEMIEI ROMÂNE Calea 13 Septembrie nr. 13, Sector 5, Bucureşti 76117 Telefon 021–410.38.46; 021–410.32.00/2107,
    [Show full text]
  • Kinematics and Extent of the Piemont-Liguria Basin
    https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-161 Preprint. Discussion started: 8 October 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Kinematics and extent of the Piemont-Liguria Basin – implications for subduction processes in the Alps Eline Le Breton1, Sascha Brune2,3, Kamil Ustaszewski4, Sabin Zahirovic5, Maria Seton5, R. Dietmar Müller5 5 1Department of Earth Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany 2Geodynamic Modelling Section, German Research Centre for Geosciences, GFZ Potsdam, Germany 3Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany 4Institute for Geological Sciences, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany 10 5EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Correspondence to: Eline Le Breton ([email protected]) Abstract. Assessing the size of a former ocean, of which only remnants are found in mountain belts, is challenging but crucial to understand subduction and exhumation processes. Here we present new constraints on the opening and width of the Piemont- Liguria (PL) Ocean, known as the Alpine Tethys together with the Valais Basin. We use a regional tectonic reconstruction of 15 the Western Mediterranean-Alpine area, implemented into a global plate motion model with lithospheric deformation, and 2D thermo-mechanical modelling of the rifting phase to test our kinematic reconstructions for geodynamic consistency. Our model fits well with independent datasets (i.e. ages of syn-rift sediments, rift-related fault activity and mafic rocks) and shows that the PL Basin opened in four stages: (1) Rifting of the proximal continental margin in Early Jurassic (200-180 Ma), (2) Hyper- extension of the distal margin in Early-Middle Jurassic (180-165 Ma), (3) Ocean-Continent Transition (OCT) formation with 20 mantle exhumation and MORB-type magmatism in Middle-Late Jurassic (165-154 Ma), (4) Break-up and “mature” oceanic spreading mostly in Late Jurassic (154-145 Ma).
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Website Archelogia Bulga
    ARCHAEOLOGIA BULGARICA XV 2011 #3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLES Nankov, E.: Berenike Bids Farewell to Seuthes III: e Silver-Gilt Scallop Shell Pyxis from the Golyama Kosmatka Tumulus ........................................................................................1 Radoslavova, G. / Dzanev, G. / Nikolov, N.: e Battle at Abritus in AD 251: Written Sources, Archaeological and Numismatic Data ...........................................................................................23 Curta, F. / Gândilă, A.: Too Much Typology, Too Little History: A Critical Approach to the Classi cation and Interpretation of Cast Fibulae with Bent Stem..............................................51 Cholakov, I. / Chukalev, K.: Statistics on the Archaeological Surveys in Bulgaria, 2006-2010 ..........................83 REVIEWS ARCHAEOLOGIA BULGARICA appears three times a year (20 x 28 cm, ca. 100 pages per number) and Slawisch, A.: Die Grabsteine der römischen Provinz racia. Aufnahme, Verarbeitung und Weitergabe provides a publishing forum for research in archaeology in the broadest sense of the term. ere are no überregionaler Ausdrucksmittel am Beispiel der Grabsteine einer Binnenprovinz zwischen Ost und West. restrictions as to time and territory but the emphasis is on Southeastern Europe. Beier & Beran, Langenweißbach, 2007. (Ivanov, M.) ................................................................................................97 Objective: interdisciplinary research of archaeology. Contents: articles and reviews. Languages: English, German
    [Show full text]
  • 165 Years of Roman Rule on the Left Bank of the Danube. at The
    92 Chapter III PROVINCIA DACIA AUGUSTI: 165 years of Roman rule on the left bank of the Danube. At the beginning of the 2nd century, in the Spring of 101AD, Roman Forces marched against the Kingdom of Decebal. We already know what the Roman's rationale was for starting this war and we also know that the real reason was likely to have been the personal ambition of the first Provincial Emperor, Trajan (he was born in Hispania a man of Macedonian background among Greeks). The Roman armies marched against a client-state of Rome, which was a subordinate ally of Rome. Decebal did not want to wage war against Rome and his recurring peace offers confirm this. It is unlikely that Trajan would only have decided on the total conquest of the Dacian Kingdom after he waged his first campaign in 101-102. After this, Roman garrisons were established in the Province - their ongoing presence is reflected by the Latin names of towns (as recorded by Ptolemy). At Dobreta they begin to build the stone bridge which will span the Danube. It was built in accordance with plans made by Apollodorus of Damascus to promote continuous traffic - it was an accomplishment unmatched - even by Rome. This vast project portends that Trajan began the expedition against Dacia in 101 with the intention of incorporating the Kingdom into the Roman Empire. The Emperor, who founded a city (Nicopolis) to commemorate his victory over Dacia, has embarked on this campaign not only for reasons of personal ambition. The 93 economic situation of the Empire was dismal at the beginning of Trajan's reign; by the end of the second Dacian War it has vastly improved.
    [Show full text]