THEODORE ROOSEVELT and the LABOR MOVEMENT a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Hayward in Partial F

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THEODORE ROOSEVELT and the LABOR MOVEMENT a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Hayward in Partial F THEODORE ROOSEVELT AND THE LABOR MOVEMENT A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Hayward In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History By Peter R. Perry June, 1991 THEODORE ROOSEVELT AND THE LABOR MOVru~ENT By Peter R. Perry Approved: Date: ~J ~. /qCj/ :2 \ ~~ \CUL-­ \ ii PREFACE Theodore Roosevelt was an important Progressive symbol. Many saw him as the quintesser!tial reformer of his age. An inherent conflict between the desire for humanitarian social reforms and the need for orderly change sometimes left Progressives at odds with labor. Roosevelt's stand on labor issues perhaps best exemplifies this paradox. At times he championed workers' struggles for decent working conditions. At others, he quickly dispatched federal troops to quell labor disturbances. I will examine thre~ separate incidents that help reveal Roosevel t's attitude toward the workers' movement. The anthracite coal .strike of 1902 shows Roosevelt at his best. In that crisis, he seized the initiative by bringing )abor and capital to the negotiating table. He proved to be a successful mediator in what contemporaries saw as the most significant strike in American history. Scarcely one year later, Roosevelt rejected labor's appeals and effectively ended the closed shop in the Government Printing Office. At the same time, he still defended the union's right to exist in the government service. Finally, the Goldfield miners strike of 1907­ 1908 offers a less flattering view of the President. 111 Here, Roosevelt quickly dispatched federal troops to maintain order at the request of the Nevada governor before determining whether they were actually needed. The troops strengthened the operators' hand. The strike was broken and the miners union was destroyed in the process. It is easy to see that Roosevelt had an ambiguous relationship with labor. Despite his disparate stands, I will attempt to demonstrate that there was an ideological consistency to Roosevelt's actions. He supported a worker's right to join a union and hoped that employers would recognize that unions could play a responsible role in society. To him, this was merely a matter of justice and fair play. However, Roosevelt could never tolerate unions that challenged his authority. Like many other Progressives, the President feared militant sectors of the labor movement. He was convinced that they were violence­ prone and could never act in a responsible manner. This conviction guided Roosevelt's actions, since the maintenance of order was paramount to the President. Perhaps Roosevelt's comment to Labor Commissioner Carroll wright expresses this thought best: liThe first principle of civilization is the preservation of order. without order there can be no liberty and the foe of order is the foe of liberty."1 Roosevelt's activities during the iv anthracite strike, the Government Printing Office dispute, and the Goldfield conflict need to be seen in this context. Only then can we truly understand the paradoxica 1 relationship between Rooseve 1t and the labor movement. v TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE: iii CHAPTER ONE: THE ANTHRACITE COAL STRIKE OF 1902 1 CHAPTER TWO: THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE AND THE OPEN SHOP 26 CHAPTER THREE: THE GOLDFIELD STRIKE, 1907-1908 49 CONCLUSION: 72 NOTES: 77 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY: 91 vi CHAPTER 1 THE ANTHRACITE COAL STRIKE OF 1902 The origins of the 1902 coal strike can be traced to the settlement of a dispute in the anthracite mines two yearsear1i er. In the fall of 1900, one hundred thousand miners walked off their jobs in the anthracite regions of Pennsylvania and Wyoming. This was unsettling news to Senator Mark Hanna. He feared the strike would jeopardize McKinley's re-election campaign. Hanna worked feverishly to settle tne dispute before November, using the good offices of the National Civic Federation (NCF). Dangling the spectre of a William Jennings Bryan presidency, which presumably would be hostile to business, in front of a reluctant group of coal operators, Hanna convinced them to grant some concessions in exchange for a temporary labor peace. The miners receiveu a ten percent wage increase, a promise of arbitration on local issues, and other nominal improvements. However, the operators refused to recognize the miners' union, the United Mine Workers (UMW).l The crlsis was averted, but the underlying problem remained unsolved. Seventy to eighty percent of all anthracite fields were owned by six railroad corporations. 2 To a man, the presidents of these companies were in no mood for further 1 2 compromise when the agreement expired in April, 1901. The UMW looked forward to the expiration as an opportunity to gain further improvements in working conditions and win formal recognition from the operators. They had reason to be confident. During the strike, their ranks had swelled from 8,000 to 100,000 members. 3 UMW president John Mitchell also hoped that his ties with Hanna and the NCF would payoff again. But the repeated efforts of Mitchell and the NCF to arrange negotiations with the operators failed. The operators consented only to extending the wage scale for another year but adamantly refused to deal directly with the union. The stage was set for a showdown in 1902. In March, 1902 the union attempted again to meet with the operators to negotiate over wages and conditions. It demanded a twenty percent pay increase, an eight-hour day, and universal recognition of 2,240 pounds of coal as a basis for pay.4 (Miners were paid based on tons of coal mined, but the operators had different definitions of what constituted a ton of coal). Hanna stepped in to finally secure a meeting between Mitchell and the operators, but the result was merely a thirty-day cooling-off period. The UMW called a meeting in Hazelton, Pennsylvania on May 14, 1902 to determine whether to strike. Mitchell did not want the miners to go out. He feared a strike would be 3 long, hard and difficult to Wln. He also hoped that: ...the operators would see the folly of their course and make concessions, which woul d have preserved the mineworkers and their famil ies, as well as the general public, f~om the hardships and horrors of a protracted conflict. But Mitchell failed to convince the rank and file, who no longer shared his optimism that the operators would come to their senses. They voted to strike on May 15 if an agreement was not reached. Mitchell and Hanna tried desperately to make a breakthrough. The UMW reduced its wage demand to ten percent, its work day to nine hours, and offered to submit all remaining issues to arbitration. 6 Such flexibility had absolutely no effect on the operators. They were supremely confident that a strike would be easily crushed, and they looked forward to the opportunity to break the union. Theodore Roosevelt, ascending to the presidency upon McKinley's assassination in September, 1901, observed the situation. There is no evidence in Rooseve 1t's personal papers to indicate any alarm at the onset of the strike. Further, newspaper reports carried no comments from the President about the dispute. Nevertheless, his speeches and writings from the period demonstrate that Roosevelt hac many opinions on the proper relationship between labor and capital. His perspective was common to many middle class reformers of the time. He mistrusted 4 the very wealthy and feared the great masses. Great corporations, he thought, needed to behave in a more rational manner, reflecting a responsibility to the greater society. Roosevelt felt this was essential to stop the spread of socialism. Workers had legitimate rights, and one of them was to join unions. However, if unions were to occupy their rightful place in society, they must moderate their demands and avoid violence at all costs. Roosevelt often tended to place unions and business on the same plane, treating both as though they had similar power and responsibilities. For example, in a speech before Congress in 1902, he specified the roles of labor and capital in the following manner: Each must refrain from arbitrary or tyrannous inter­ ference with the rights of others. Organized capital and organized labor alike should remember that in the long run the interest of each must be brought into harmony with the interest of the general public; and the conduct of each must conform to the fundamental rules of obedience to the law, of individu~l freedom, and of justice and fair dealing toward all. Roosevelt was serious about these guidelines. During the course of the 1902 anthracite strike, he would come to judge the combatants by applying this framework. John Mitchell was a labor leader who fit beauti- fully into the Rooseveltian mold. While he wanted workers to have a more equitable share of the pie, Mitchell never challenged existing social relations. He saw labor and capital as mutually dependent partners in production. fhe 5 UMW leader wanted little more than formal recognition for his union and yearly collective bargaining arrangements with the operators. 8 He prefered the quiet methods of the NCF to the raucous tactics of labor militants. He stood in stark contrast to the radical Big Bill Haywood of the Western Federation of Miners, who called for revolutionary change In the system of production. 9 On the other hand, the operators came to represent all the things Roosevelt detested in big business. They were greedy, narrow-minded, and cared little how their actions might affect the country. They consistently rebuffed all of Mitchell's and the NCF's efforts to negotiate reasonable so I utions. Their condescension and arrogance eventually isolated them from nearly the entire nation and earned Roosevelt's wrath as well.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 18 Video, “The Stockyard Jungle,” Portrays the Horrors of the Meatpacking Industry First Investigated by Upton Sinclair
    The Progressive Movement 1890–1919 Why It Matters Industrialization changed American society. Cities were crowded with new immigrants, working conditions were often bad, and the old political system was breaking down. These conditions gave rise to the Progressive movement. Progressives campaigned for both political and social reforms for more than two decades and enjoyed significant successes at the local, state, and national levels. The Impact Today Many Progressive-era changes are still alive in the United States today. • Political parties hold direct primaries to nominate candidates for office. • The Seventeenth Amendment calls for the direct election of senators. • Federal regulation of food and drugs began in this period. The American Vision Video The Chapter 18 video, “The Stockyard Jungle,” portrays the horrors of the meatpacking industry first investigated by Upton Sinclair. 1889 • Hull House 1902 • Maryland workers’ 1904 opens in 1890 • Ida Tarbell’s History of Chicago compensation laws • Jacob Riis’s How passed the Standard Oil the Other Half Company published ▲ Lives published B. Harrison Cleveland McKinley T. Roosevelt 1889–1893 ▲ 1893–1897 1897–1901 1901–1909 ▲ ▲ 1890 1900 ▼ ▼ ▼▼ 1884 1900 • Toynbee Hall, first settlement • Freud’s Interpretation 1902 house, established in London of Dreams published • Anglo-Japanese alliance formed 1903 • Russian Bolshevik Party established by Lenin 544 Women marching for the vote in New York City, 1912 1905 • Industrial Workers of the World founded 1913 1906 1910 • Seventeenth 1920 • Pure Food and • Mann-Elkins Amendment • Nineteenth Amendment Drug Act passed Act passed ratified ratified, guaranteeing women’s voting rights ▲ HISTORY Taft Wilson ▲ ▲ 1909–1913 ▲▲1913–1921 Chapter Overview Visit the American Vision 1910 1920 Web site at tav.glencoe.com and click on Chapter ▼ ▼ ▼ Overviews—Chapter 18 to preview chapter information.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2015 Maine State Government Annual Report
    MAINE STATE GOVERNMENT ANNUAL REPORT 2014-2015 A Compilation of Annual Reports of State Departments and Agencies Published at Augusta, Maine 2015 Paul R. LePage Paul R. LePage Governor of Maine Governor of Maine Compiled and edited by the Compiled and edited by the DepartmentDepartment of Administrative of Administrative and andFinancial Financial Services, Services, BureauBureau of the of Budgetthe Budget Printed Under Appropriation Number 038 18B 2204 02 9010 Printed Under Appropriation Number 038 18B 2204 02 9010 To obtain copies of this Annual Report Contact: DepartmentTo ofobtain Administrative copies of this and Annual Financial Report Services Contact: Department of Administrative andBureau Financial of General Services Services Bureau Centralof General Printing Services Division 9 State House Station,Central Augusta, Printing ME Division 04333-0009 9 State House Station, Augusta, ME 04333-0009 A word about copying material contained in this report… A word about copying material contained in this report… Any person may reproduce, without restriction, any or all material in this edition. AnyWhen person several may copies reproduce, of materials without are restrict madeion, for distribution,any or all material credit should in this be edition. given to the WhenMaine several State copies Government of materials Annual are made Report. for distribution, credit should be given to the Maine State When Government any part Annual of the textReport. is partially reproduced for distribution, it should be noted Whenthat itany is partonly of a partthe textand isnot partially the whole reproduced text as published.for distribution, Problems it should inherent be noted to “out of that itcontext” is only aquotes part and may not detract the whole from text the as information published.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Regulation and the Origins of the Corporate Income Tax
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 66 Issue 1 Article 2 Winter 1990 Corporate Regulation and the Origins of the Corporate Income Tax Marjorie E. Kornhauser Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation Kornhauser, Marjorie E. (1990) "Corporate Regulation and the Origins of the Corporate Income Tax," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 66 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol66/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Corporate Regulation and the Origins of the Corporate Income Taxt MAiuoRm E. KORNHAUSIER* INTRODUCTION Two of the major changes the United States experienced during the Progressive Era were the growth of large corporations and the acceptance of the income tax. This Article examines the intersection of these two changes at a point called the Corporate Excise Tax of 1909.1 The traditional view of this tax holds that the tax was primarily a political stepping stone toward the income tax, born of the struggle between pro and anti-income tax advocates and of the history of tax. It is perceived as a compromise at best, at worst as a barrier to the eventually triumphant income tax reform. This view is not wrong, it is simply incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Moose Party Election of 1912 Continued
    POPULISTS PROGRESSIVES Monetary Policy 1. Bland-Allison Act 1878 1. Federal Reserve Act 1913 a. Farmers want supply of 2. 16th Amendment-income taxes money to increase 3. Federal Farm Loan Act 1916 2. Income tax 3. Federal loan program 4. Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan & Trust Co. –invalidated income tax 1. 8-hour day 1. Illinois Factory Act 1893 Labor Issues 2. Restrict immigration (nativism) 2. Coal Strike – government can intervene 3. Elkins Act 1903 put teeth into ICC 4. Hepburn Act 1906 – ICC can set maximum railroad rates 5. Workman’s Compensation Act-1916 6. Adamson Act 1916 Big Business 1. Government regulation of 1. Sherman Anti-Trust Act enforced Regulations railroads, utilities, commun. 2. Clayton Anti-Trust Act 1914 2. Granger Organizations 3. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) 3. Cooperatives 4. Underwood Act 1913 4. Lower tariffs 5. Muckrakers – Ida Turnbell 5. US v. EC Knight Co. (refused to make sugar trust) Government 1. Direct Election of senators 1. City-managers 2. One term for president and 2. Initiatives, referendum, recall vice-president 3. 17th Amendment – direct election of 3. Pendleton Civil Service Act 1883 senators 4. Political machines – city/ward 4. “Homerule” –city manager/city council bosses 5. 19th Amendment-women suffrage Consumer 1. Pushed for tariff reductions 1. Meat Inspection Act 1906 Protection 2. Pure Food and Drug Act 1906 Conservation 1. National Reclamation Act 1902 Social Issues 1. Settlement Houses 1. National Child Labor Committee 1904 2. Social Gospel 2. Keating-Owen Act 1916 3. Muller v. Oregon 1908 4. Bunting v. Oregon 1917 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Progressive Era, 1900-1920
    AP U.S. History: Unit 7.2 Student Edition The Progressive Era, 1900-1920 I. Road to Progressivism Use space below for notes A. The Greenback Labor Party of the 1870s sought to thwart the power of the "robber barons," support organized labor, and institute inflationary monetary measures. Supported primarily by farmers B. Legacy of Populism 1. Populism failed as a third-party cause but it had political influence for 25 years after its failure in the 1896 election. 2. Populist ideas that carried forward: a. railroad legislation (1903 & 1906) b. income tax (16th Amendment, 1912) c. expanded currency and credit structure (1913, 1916) d. direct election of senators (17th Amendment, 1913) e. initiative, referendum and recall (early 1900s in certain states) f. postal savings banks (1910) g. subtreasury plan (1916) 3. Though Populism was geared to rural life, many of its ideas appealed to urban progressives who sought to regulate trusts, reduce political machine influence, and remedy social injustice. POPULISM PROGRESSIVISM NEW DEAL (1890-1896) (1900-1920) (1933-1938) II. Rise of Progressivism th A. Former Mugwumps (reform-minded Republicans of the late-19 century) desired a return to pre-monopoly America. 1. Men of wealth and social standing lamented the changes in America’s political and social climate due to the rise of industrialists: monopoly, plutocracy and oligarchy. a. Protestant/Victorian ideals of hard work and morality leading to success were now threatened by the “nouveau riche,” the super wealthy, who seemed to thrive on conspicuous consumption. b. Earlier Mugwump leaders of local communities were now eclipsed by political machines catering to big business and immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of Three Presidents of the United States on Multicultural Education
    Influences of Three Presidents of the United States on Multicultural Education A Series of Research Studies in Educational Policy Third Installment: Examining Presidents John Quincy Adams, Theodore Roosevelt, and Harry S. Truman By H. Prentice Baptiste & Emil J. Michal, Jr. Introduction sachusetts, the University of Washington occupied the office of President of the in Seattle, the University of Wisconsin at United States. There are, however, connec- The recognition, development and Madison, the University of Houston, and tions that can be made among them. One implementation of multicultural education New Mexico State University are actively thread was the political backgrounds of in this country is a relatively new and engaged in educating students to become these men. Each would reflect the begin- emerging idea (Apple, 1979; Banks, 1977; multicultural educators (Gay, 1994). nings, evolution, and change of political Burnett, 1994; Delpit, 1992; Frazier, 1977; National professional organizations parties in this country. Garcia, E, 1994; Grant, 1977; Hunter, such as the National Council for the Social Adams and Roosevelt were both men 1974; Kallen, 1970; La Belle, 1976; Pai, Studies, the National Council for the Ac- who did not maintain only one political 1984). Prior to the middle of the previous creditation of Teacher Education and the party affiliation but moved between par- century, the concept of addressing and pro- National Education Association have de- ties as their consciences and circumstances viding a meaningful educational experience clared their commitments to multicultural dictated. Indeed, Adams is listed as be- for all students, including students of color, education. In 1990, the National Associa- longing to three different parties: Whig, was non-existent.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of U. S. History
    OUTLINE OF U.S. History Early Settlement Colonial Period Road to Independence Forming a Government Westward Expansion Sectional Conflict Civil War Economic Growth Discontent and Reform War, Prosperity, and Depression The New Deal and World War II Postwar Prosperity Civil Rights and Social Change A New World Order Bridge to the 21st Century 2008 Presidential Election OUTLINEOUTLINE OFOF UU..SS.. HISTORYHISTORY Bureau of International Information Programs U.S. Department of State 2011 OUTLINEOUTLINE OFOF UU..SS.. HISTORYHISTORY CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Early America . 4 CHAPTER 2 The Colonial Period . 22 CHAPTER 3 The Road to Independence . 50. CHAPTER 4 The Formation of a National Government . 66 CHAPTER 5 Westward Expansion and Regional Differences . .110 CHAPTER 6 Sectional Conflict . .128 CHAPTER 7 The Civil War and Reconstruction . .140 CHAPTER 8 Growth and Transformation . .154 CHAPTER 9 Discontent and Reform . .188 CHAPTER 10 War, Prosperity, and Depression . .202 CHAPTER 11 The New Deal and World War II . .212 CHAPTER 12 Postwar America . 256. CHAPTER 13 Decades of Change: 1960-1980 . .274 CHAPTER 14 The New Conservatism and a New World Order . .304 CHAPTER 15 Bridge to the 21st Century . .320 CHAPTER 16 Politics of Hope . .340 PICTURE PROFILES Becoming a Nation . 38 Transforming a Nation . 89 Monuments and Memorials . .161 Turmoil and Change . .229 21st Century Nation . 293. Bibliography . .346 Index . 349. 4 CHAPTER 1 EARLY AMERICA Mesa Verde settlement in Colorado, 13th century. CHAPTER 1: EARLY AMERICA “Heaven and Earth never agreed better to frame a place for man’s habitation.” Jamestown founder John Smith, 1607 THE FIRST AMERICANS ancestors had for thousands of years, along the Siberian coast and then At the height of the Ice Age, be- across the land bridge .
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Federal Water Resources Programs, 1800-1960 ABSTRACT
    Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION N0.1233 A History of Federal Water Resources Programs, 1800-1960 ABSTRACT This publication discusses most of the significant Federal water resources legislation up to 1960 and describes the programs of U.S. planning and construction agencies; the extent of Federal river basin planning and development up to 1960; and the beginning of Federal encouragement of and cooperation with State and local planning. Also discussed are national political issues related to water resources; relationships between Congress and the Executive and between Federal planning agencies; and the origins and continuation of traditional Federal policies and programs favoring natural resources development to strengthen the economic condition of smaller cities, agriculture, and the West. The final chapter investigates the extent to which, after World War II, the Federal "water establishment" became aware of and able to cope with the water resources problems resulting from unprecedented growth of metropolitan centers and technological change. Keywords: Water resources, planning, development, legislation, agencies, river basins, water politics, study commissions. Cover illustration is one panel of a mural, "The Building of a Dam," painted by William Gropper in 1937. The mural is in the main building of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. 20250 u S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE June 1972 Economic Research Service PREFACE This publication presents a history of Federal water post-World War II period. This division of history into resources planning and development programs from "eras" is necessarily arbitrary. An attempt has been 1800 to 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Labor Movement in Modern History and Government Textbooks
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 088 789 SO 007 302 AUTHOR Sloan, Irving TITLE The American Labor Movement in Modern History and Government Textbooks. INSTITUTION American Federation of Teachers, Washington, E.C. PUB DATE [74] NOTE 53p. AVAILABLE FROM American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, 1012 14th St., N. W., Washington, D. C. 20005 (Item No. 598, $0.30) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$3.15 DESCRIPTORS *American Government (Course); *Collective Bargaining; Evaluation Criteria; High School Curriculum; Industrial Relations; Labor Conditions; Labor Force; Labor Legislation; *Labor Unions; Secondary Education; Surveys; Textbook Content; *Textbook Evaluation; Textbooks; *United States History ABSTRACT A survey of nineteen American history high school texts and eight government texts attempts to discover if schools are still failing to teach adequately about labor unions, their history, procedures, and purposes. For each text a summary account is provided of what the text has to say about labor in terms of a set of pre-established criteria. At the end of the review a distillation of all references to labor topics which appear in the text's index is included. This gives an approximate idea of the quantitative coverage of labor in the text; of the tone, emphasis and selections of topics dealt within the text's narrative; and of whether the labor topic is merely cited or listed, or whether it is analyzed and described. An introduction to the survey and review summarizes the labor events and terms regarded as basic to an adequate treatment of organized labor. The summary evaluation placed at, the end of each text's review is based upon the extent to which the text included the items listed in a meaningful way for the student.
    [Show full text]
  • The Progressive Era, 1900-1916 Six Major Themes We Will Consider: I
    The Progressive Era, 1900-1916 Six major themes we will consider: I. Shift from Gilded Age to Progressive Era Reform II. Five Goals of the Progressive Era Reform Movement III. Theodore Roosevelt and Republican Progressivism IV. William Howard Taft, Roosevelt’s protégé outdoes his boss V. The Election of 1912 – Progressives battle each other VI. Woodrow Wilson’s Progressivism I Theme One. Shift from Gilded Age to Progressive Era A. During the Gilded Age, Americans had been arguing about whether to reform. They asked questions like: "should there be a civil service?" B. During the Progressive Era the public figures were arguing about how to reform. C. The Gilded Age was full of all out violence in labor and in the agrarian revolt. During the Progressive Era the violence was gone. D. During Gilded Age there were distinct divisions among those who supported reform. 1. Mugwumps, these people were seen as elitist and don't get a lot of support. They were wealthy, educated and interested in Civil Service Reform. 2. Agrarian Revolters and Laborers, on the other hand, led what was a bottom up movement that did not succeed either. These people, for the most part, lacked the education and the economic power of the Mugwumps. E. During the Progressive Era, there was a coalition built between reformers. F. These reformers have much more power, but since labor unionist, agrarian revolters, and mugwumps are all combined the reform is less focused. G. The aims were not as clear and there was a lot of conflict within the reformers own associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodore Roosevelt
    COVER rules The Making of America: Theodore Roosevelt (Roosevelt) The Strenuous Life (Roosevelt) At home and abroad, he was the locomotive president, the man who drew his flourishing Fighting the Fat Cats (Roosevelt) nation into the future To put the brakes on the growth of huge, monopolistic corporations, Teddy took on one The War of 1912 (Roosevelt) of the nation's richest men: J. Pierpont Morgan T.R. failed in his brash bid to regain the White House, but his Bull Moose Party pushed ideas Lessons from a Larger-than-Life President that would animate the century (Roosevelt / Viewpoint) The Police Commish (Roosevelt) An American Princess With righteous fury and mixed results, Irreverent Alice Roosevelt Longworth Roosevelt tried to weed out corrupt cops and exasperated her father Teddy and enchanted suppress vice in big, bad New York City in the Washington's elite 1890s A Step Back For Blacks The Self-Made Man (Roosevelt) Despite a promising start, the Progressive-era He was a sickly child. But through sheer will, President failed to provide a square deal for all muscular effort--and a lot of time in the great outdoors--he became a powerful, passionate The Roosevelt Legacy Bush adult Shouldn't Carry On (Roosevelt) Conservatives unhappy with the President's The River of Doubt (Roosevelt) limitless ambition and world-saving impulses Roosevelt nearly died while exploring an wish he would find a different 20th century uncharted stretch of the Amazon. It was his Republican hero than Teddy final adventure Why we should study Charging Into Fame Theodore Roosevelt (Roosevelt) One "crowded hour" on a hillside in Cuba Because he was a natural maverick and made Roosevelt a national hero.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interest of Catholic Leaders in Labor Problems 1875-1900
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1952 The Interest of Catholic Leaders in Labor Problems 1875-1900 Jane Dominic Birney Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Birney, Jane Dominic, "The Interest of Catholic Leaders in Labor Problems 1875-1900" (1952). Master's Theses. 911. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/911 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1952 Jane Dominic Birney .. fBI :ommBS! OP OAtHOLIC tEADDl II' lABOR PROBmIIS 187S--1900 by Sl.t8r lane D_l1110 l1ra8, to. P. 1 the,l. 8ubld. tted to the 'aoult,. ot the Gra4ute Sehool of Loy,la UDlveralty 1n Part1al rult111ment ot tbe Requir.ments tor the DeI1".. ot lIa.t.!' .f Art. !ABDI or COID_S Chapter Pac_ I • mB()I)tJ'CI lOll • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Soo,. ot the pa,. ...... n1nc ot 1n4u.trlaU. -!a4u.trlal ••ptuUa-looDOIlie powth to 186O-r.bor prebl•• betore 186O ...ltt •• , ••t the Oin1 War-Catholle Churoh 1n ....rl.a, 183o-186O-ZXternal and lnteraal OharGh pr.... 1eIt.... -oo ... 1:1011 ot the Ohurch with labor betore 1860. II. !HI Plosma 0., WCIl D TBZ UD IDlftlftH ' OBItUl!' • •• • • • • • • ~ • • • • • • • • • • 10 !be Churoh and e.onomic llte--Cathol1.
    [Show full text]