CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 4 (2013) 442–445
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijscr
Fracture of the body of hamate associated with a fracture
of the base of fourth metacarpal: A case report and review of literature
of the last 20 years
∗
C. Cano Gala ,D.Pescador Hernández, D.A. Rendón Díaz, J. López Olmedo,
J. Blanco Blanco
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Virgen de la Vega Hospital, Health Center Complex of Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 58, 37007
Salamanca, Spain
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the carpal bones are often difficult to diagnose and treat due to the complex
Received 3 December 2012
bone architecture of this region. Hamate fractures, particularly body fractures, are extremely uncommon.
Received in revised form 24 January 2013
PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a case of a coronal fracture of the hamate associated with a fracture
Accepted 27 January 2013
of the base of the fourth metacarpal, which was treated by open reduction and internal fixation.
Available online 13 February 2013
DISCUSSION: Some of hamate body fractures are associated with other injuries like metacarpal fractures.
Its diagnosis is difficult and requires a high clinical suspicion and a proper radiological examination. This
Keywords:
fracture is a very rare lesion that can raise questions about their most adequate diagnostic and therapeutic Base
Fourth approaches.
Fracture CONCLUSION: After reviewing the literature, we conclude that there is a high rate of delay in the diagnosis
Hamate of these lesions, probably due to their rarity and to the lack of radiological studies specifically targeting
Metacarpal this region. Despite this, surgical treatment in its different modalities has been shown to have the best
clinical and functional results.
© 2013 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction associated with a fourth metacarpal fracture, which was success-
fully treated by ORIF and immobilization for 8 weeks.
Coronal fractures of the hamate bone, either associated to frac-
1
tures of the base of the metacarpal or not, are rare lesions.
Some authors believe that the main cause for these lesions is a 2. Presentation of case
direct impact against a hard surface with a clenched fist. Clinically,
patients with hamate fracture have pain and swelling. Radiologi- We report a case of a 34 years old, right-handed construction
cal diagnosis with posteroanterior and lateral radiographs may not worker, that goes to emergency (ER) room with pain on the back
2
provide adequate images, and cause these injuries go unnoticed. of his right wrist after an accidental fall with support on his right
◦
Usually, oblique radiographs (30 ) are required in order to reveal hand a few hours ago. The physical examination reveals swelling
the fracture. It is advisable to complete the radiological study with and severe pain on the ulnar side of the wrist. Posteroanterior
a computed tomography (CT) scan of the wrist, which will help us and lateral radiographies were inconclusive, so a computerized
in deciding the therapeutic approach. A conservative approach will tomography was performed, which showed a coronal fracture of
only be advisable in cases without displacement or with minimal the body of the hamate associated with a fracture of the base of the
displacement, which is rare, due to the fact that these fractures fourth metacarpal (Figs. 1 and 2). We decided to perform an open
are usually unstable. For this reason, open reduction and internal reduction with internal fixation with an interfragmentary screw
fixation (ORIF) are usually applied. The osteosynthesis is gen- associated to 2 Kirschner wires (used as a temporary stabilization
erally carried out with screws and/or Kirschner wires, followed device) (Fig. 3). The fracture was reduced and fixed through a dor-
by an inmobilization period no less than 6 weeks. This treat- sal approach whereby it was possible to check the reduction of the
ment approach has resulted in the better clinical and radiological carpal arcs (Fig. 4).
3,4
outcomes. We report a case of a fracture of the body of the hamate The patient was immobilized, first with a splint and later by
means of an antebrachial plaster cast that was removed after
8 weeks, together with both percutaneous wires. The evolutive
∗ follow-up after 3 months shows no pain, normal balance of the
Corresponding author at: C/Vilar Formoso 2-12, 33, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
wrist and radiological consolidation of the fracture (Fig. 5 and 6).
Tel.: +34 653611309.
The patient also has returned to work.
E-mail address: [email protected] (C. Cano Gala).
2210-2612/$ – see front matter © 2013 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.01.023
CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
C. Cano Gala et al. / International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 4 (2013) 442–445 443
Figs. 1 and 2. CT scan.
3. Discussion
Hamate fractures represent only 2–4% of all carpal fractures.
Within these, fractures involving the coronal plane of the body
3
of the hamate are even less frequent. Considering the pro-
duction mechanisms of these fractures may be associated with
fractures and fracture/dislocation of the bases of the fourth and
fifth metacarpals. Due to carpal anatomy, all patterns of this lesion
involves the existence of a certain degree of instability, because
the action of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) and of the flexor carpi
ulnaris (FCU), which are inserted into the back of the base of the
5th metacarpal bone and the pisiform bone (which exerts force
on the 5th metacarpal via the pisometacarpal ligament), respec-
tively. Diagnosis is difficult, and a high clinical suspicion and an
adequate use of the radiological tests are required. CT scan can be
useful for the diagnosis and for an accurate definition of the pat-
tern of the lesion. The literature shows that this lesion can easily
Fig. 3. Intraoperative radioscopy.
3,4
go unnoticed. An early diagnosis is essential in order to avoid or
minimize the risk of side effects, such as chronic post-traumatic
arthritis or a potential loss of strength of the hand.
Studies on cadavers have helped us to clarify the biomechani-
cal and physiopathological processes of these lesions, and showed
that the position, direction and transmission of forces through the
4th metacarpal determine the pattern of the fracture. Milch classi-
fied hamate fractures into two types: fractures of the body (with a
fracture line that extends toward the radial or ulnar side of the
hook) and fractures of the hook. Coronal fractures of the body
were considered so rare that they were not included in Milch’s
5
classification. On the contrary, a study carried out by Ebraheim
et al. on 11 cases of fractures of the hamate bone, 3 patterns of
coronal fractures were found. In type A, the fracture line crosses the
center of the body of the hamate bone. In type B, the line crosses
the body obliquely. Both types required open reduction and internal
fixation. A third kind, type C, showed a carpometacarpal dislocation
associated to a small avulsion of the distal end of the hamate bone.
Fig. 4. Intraoperative image that shows the reduction and the operation approach. In this case, the authors presented the possibility of treating it with
CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
444 C. Cano Gala et al. / International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 4 (2013) 442–445
Figs. 5 and 6. Radiological control 3 months after surgery.
a closed reduction and percutaneous wires, due to the small size of projections must lead to the suspicion of this kind of lesion. In
6 ◦
the fragment. this case, 30 oblique radiograph will show a better image of
In an analysis carried out with 20 cadavers by Yoshida et al., 45% this kind of fracture. Clinical suspicion must appear when the AP
of the cases presented fractures of the hamate bone, 15% showed radiograph shows a reduction of the articular space between the
fractures of the base of the 4th metacarpal bone, and the com- hamate body and the 5th metacarpal, or when the hamate bone
bination of both lesions (which can be found in the case we are projects a double shadow. In the case of lateral radiographs, small
7
presenting) was not seen in any of them. subdislocations of the bases of the 4th and 5th metacarpal bones
Pain and deformity of the ulnar side of the carpal bone, in will constitute an indicative sign. The different treatment options
absence of suspicious images in the anteroposterior and lateral and his results can be compared in Table 1.
Table 1
Retrospective analysis of studies published in the last 20 years.
Study No. of cases Pattern of the fracture Diagnostic tests Approach % Success after 3 months
1
Langenhan et al. 2 Coronal fracture of body + base of the AP/Lat X-ray CT scan ORIF (screws and 100%
4th metacarpal Kirschner wires)
8
Torres et al. 1 Isolated coronal fracture of body AP/Lat X-ray Orthopedic (4 months 100% immobilization)
2 ◦
Vishal H Borse et al. 1 Coronal fracture of body with AP/Lat X-ray 30 ORIF (screws) 100%
subdislocation of the 4th metacarpal oblique X-ray
9
Busche et al. 1 Coronal fracture of body + base of the AP/Lat X-ray Orthopedic 100%
4th metacarpal (stress fracture in a (immobilization)
military patient with repeated microtraumatisms)
10 ◦
Hirano K. et al. 29 Hamulus (52%) coronal fracture of AP/Lat X-ray 30 ORIF: 31% closed 93% (2 cases of
body (37%). Transverse fracture of oblique X-ray reduc- hamulus
body (10%) tion + percutaneous pseudoarthrosis)
wires: 20% orthopedic:
17% removal: 31%
3
Roche et al. 1 Coronal fracture of body + base of the AP/Lat X-ray CT scan RAFI (tornillos de 100%
4th metacarpal Liebinger)
4 ◦
Chase et al. 1 Coronal fracture of body AP/Lat X-ray 30 ORIF 100%
oblique X-ray
6 a a ◦
Ebraheim et al. 11 Type A (9%) Type B (27%) Type C AP/Lat X-ray 30 ORIF (screws and 91% (persistence of
a
(63%) 4 cases are associated with a oblique X-ray Kirschner wires): 36% pain and functional
fracture of the base of the 4th closed reduction and limitation in the case
metacarpal percutaneous wires: that received an
54% orthopedic: 9% orthopedic approach)
11
Richard et al. 1 Coronal fracture of body AP/Lat. X-ray ORIF (screws) 100%
12 ◦
Takami et al. 2 Coronal fracture of body with AP/Lat X-ray 30 ORIF 100%
subdislocation of the 4th and 5th oblique X-ray
metacarpal
Cano et al. (2012) 1 Coronal fracture of body + base of the AP/Lat X-ray CT scan ORIF (screws) 100%
4th metacarpal
a
See text.
CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
C. Cano Gala et al. / International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 4 (2013) 442–445 445
4. Conclusion References
1. Langenhan R, Hohendorff B, Probst A. Coronal fracture dislocation of the hamate
After reviewing the literature, we conclude that there is a high
and the base of the fourth metacarpal bone: a rare form of carpometacarpal
rate of delay in the diagnosis of these lesions, probably due to their
injury. Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, Plastische Chirurgie 2011;43:
rarity and the lack of radiological studies specifically targeting this 140–6.
2. Borse Vishal H, Hahnel J, Faraj A. Lessons to be learned from a missed case
region. Despite this, surgical treatment in its different modalities
of hamate fracture: a case report. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
has been shown to have the best clinical and functional results 2010;5:64.
(Table 1). 3. Roche S, Lenehan B, Street J, O’Sullivan M. Fourth metacarpal base frac-
ture in association with coronal hamate fracture. Injury Extra 2005;36:
316–8.
Conflict of interest statement
4. Chase JM, Light TR, Benson LS. Coronal fracture of the hamate body. American
Journal of Orthopedics 1997;26:568–71.
None. 5. Milch H. Fracture of the hamate bone. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
1934;16:459.
6. Ebraheim NA, Skie MC, Savolaine ER, Jackson WT. Coronal fracture of the body
Funding of the hamate. Journal of Trauma 1995;38:169–74.
7. Yoshida R, Shah MA, Patterson RM, Buford Jr WL, Knighten J, Viegas SF. Anatomy
None. and pathomechanics of ring and small finger carpometacarpal joint injuries. The
Journal of Hand Surgery 2003;28:1035–43.
8. Torres J, Abat F, Monteiro E, Gelber P. Isolated fracture of the body of the
hamate bone. About a case. Revista Espa˜nola de Cirugía Ortopédica y Trauma- Ethical approval
tología 2011;55:288–91.
9. Busche MN, Knobloch K, Rosenthal H, Vogt PM. Stress fracture of the hamate
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for body and fourth metacarpal base following military style push-ups: an
publication of this case report and accompanying images, and a unusual trauma mechanism. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
2008;16:1158–60.
copy of this consent is available for reviewer on request.
10. Hirano K, Inoue G. Classification and treatment of hamate fractures. Hand Surgery
2005;10:151–7.
Author contributions 11. Uhl RL, Campbell M. Hamate fracture-dislocation: a case report. The Journal of
Hand Surgery 1995;20:578–80.
12. Takami H, Takahashi S, Hiraki S. Coronal fracture of the body of the hamate: case
Cano C. is the first author. Study design was done by Pescador
reports. Journal of Trauma 1992;32:110–2.
D. The manuscript was written by done by Pescador D. and Rendón
D.A. Images and artwork were designed by Lopez J. and Blanco J. supervised the study.
Open Access
This article is published Open Access at sciencedirect.com. It is distributed under the IJSCR Supplemental terms and conditions, which
permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.