Morphometry and Density Analysis of the Fifth Metacarpal by Amrita Unnikumaran a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Morphometry and Density Analysis of the Fifth Metacarpal by Amrita Unnikumaran a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of Morphometry and Density Analysis of the Fifth Metacarpal by Amrita Unnikumaran A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering Department of Medical Engineering College of Engineering University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: William E. Lee III, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Peter Simon, Ph.D. Robert Frisina, Ph.D. Sergio Gutierrez, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 25, 2019 Keywords: Bone Geometry, Bone Density, Computerized Tomography Scan Study, Sexual Dimorphism Copyright © 2019, Amrita Unnikumaran Dedication I dedicate this work to my family for their immense support and encouragement. Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my mentor Dr. Peter Simon and Dr. William Lee for their guidance and motivation which helped me succeed. I very grateful to Dr. Robert Frisina and Dr. Sergio Gutirezz for their valuable time and suggestions which kept me motivated. I would also like to extend my gratitude to University of South Florida and Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education for giving me the opportunity to learn and experience high quality research. Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................... v Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Motivation .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Aims and Objectives ........................................................................................... 2 1.3 General Limitations ....................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2: Background ................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Fifth Metacarpal ............................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Ligaments and Other Associated Structures ................................................................ 6 2.3 Fractures of Fifth Metacarpal Bones ............................................................................ 7 2.4 Current Methods of Diagnosis ...................................................................................... 8 2.5 Current Methods for Treatment of Metacarpal Fractures ........................................... 9 2.5.1 Nonsurgical Treatment .................................................................................. 9 2.5.2 Surgical Treatment ......................................................................................... 9 2.6 Previous Morphometry Studies ................................................................................. 11 Chapter 3: Methodology for Morphometry and Density Analysis of the Fifth Metacarpal ......... 15 3.1 Study Population ......................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 Segmentation ............................................................................................... 16 3.2.2 Coordinate System and Alignment .............................................................. 17 3.2.3 Normalization............................................................................................... 18 3.2.4 Measurements ............................................................................................. 19 3.2.5 Inscribed and Circumscribed Circles Calculation ......................................... 20 3.2.5.1 The Efficiency of the Algorithm .................................................... 24 3.2.6 Density Analysis ........................................................................................... 25 3.3 Statistical Analysis ....................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 4: Results and Discussions .............................................................................................. 29 4.1 Results ......................................................................................................................... 29 i 4.2 Discussions .................................................................................................................. 40 Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendations ............................................................................ 42 5.1 Implication of Results .................................................................................................. 42 5.2 Future Work and Recommendations .......................................................................... 43 References .................................................................................................................................... 45 Appendix A: Table of Results ........................................................................................................ 48 Appendix B: Statistical Analysis from SAS ..................................................................................... 54 Appendix C: Results from Previous Studies .................................................................................. 59 Appendix D: Table of Terminology ............................................................................................... 63 Appendix E: Copyright Permissions .............................................................................................. 64 ii List of Tables Table 1: Average Length of Bone as a Function of Height of the Specimen Donor ........... 30 Table 2: Average Diameter of Inscribed Circle for Canal .................................................... 30 Table 3: Average Diameter of Circumscribed Circle for Canal ........................................... 31 Table 4: Average Diameter of Inscribed Circle for Whole Bone Model ............................. 31 Table 5: Average Diameter of Circumscribed Circle for Whole Bone Model ..................... 32 Table 6: Two-Sample t-Test Assuming Unequal Variances for Canal Circumscribed Circles .................................................................................................................... 32 Table 7: Two-Sample t-Test Assuming Unequal Variances for Canal Inscribed Circles .................................................................................................................... 33 Table 8: Two-Sample t-Test Assuming Unequal Variances for Inscribed Circles of Whole Bone ........................................................................................................... 33 Table 9: Two-Sample t-Test Assuming Unequal Variances for Circumscribed Circles for Whole Bone ..................................................................................................... 33 Table 10: Region and Zone-wise Distribution of Density in Male and Female .................... 37 Table A1: Results of Minimum Values of Scribed Circles...................................................... 48 Table A2: Results of Density Distribution, Part 1 .................................................................. 50 Table A3: Results of Density Distribution, Part 2 .................................................................. 52 iii Table C1: Details of Existing Sizes of Headless Screws ......................................................... 59 Table C2: Details of existing sizes of Headed Cannulated Screws ........................................ 61 Table C3: Results from the Study of Michael Rivlin et al ...................................................... 62 Table D1: Table of Terminology Used in the Methodology of Chapter 3 ............................. 63 iv List of Figures Figure 1: 3D model of hand (right anatomical side) from MIMICS (Materialize, Leuven, Belgium) ............................................................................... 6 Figure 2: Image processed for the fifth metacarpal bone from CT scan ............................. 16 Figure 3: The image from MIMICS ....................................................................................... 18 Figure 4: The solid model of fifth metacarpal after orthogonal transformation ................ 20 Figure 5a: The bone model with the circumscribed circle around solid HU model, and circumscribed circle around the canal HU model ................................................. 21 Figure 5b: The cross-section of the 3D scribed circles drawn around the two models in possible combinations .......................................................................................... 21 Figure 6a: The cross-section of the solid HU model with the circumscribed circle and canal PC model with the inscribed circle ............................................................. 22 Figure 6b: The cross-section of the solid PC model with inscribed circle and canal HU model with circumscribed circle ..........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • New Fixation Approach for Transverse Metacarpal Neck Fracture: a Biomechanical Study
    Chiu et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2018) 13:183 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0890-2 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access New fixation approach for transverse metacarpal neck fracture: a biomechanical study Yung-Cheng Chiu1,2, Ming-Tzu Tsai3, Cheng-En Hsu4,5, Horng-Chaung Hsu1,2, Heng-Li Huang6,7 and Jui-Ting Hsu6,7* Abstract Background: Fifth metacarpal neck fracture, also known as boxer’s fracture, is the most common metacarpal fracture. Percutaneous Kirschner-wire (K-wire) pinning has been shown to produce favorable clinical results. However, the fixation power of K-wires is a major concern. Plate fixation is also a surgical option, but it has the disadvantages of tendon adhesion, requirement of secondary surgery for removal of the implant, and postoperative joint stiffness. A fixation method that causes little soft tissue damage and provides high biomechanical stability is required for patients with fifth metacarpal neck fracture for whom surgical intervention is indicated. The present study proposed fixation using K-wires and a cerclage wire to treat fifth metacarpal neck fracture. The fixation power of this new method was compared with that of K-wires alone and plates. Methods: We used a saw blade to create transverse metacarpal neck fractures in 16 artificial metacarpal bone specimens, which were then treated with four types of fixation as follows: (1) locking plate with five locking bicortical screws (LP group), (2) regular plate with five bicortical screws (RP group), (3) two K-wires (K group), and (4) two K-wires and a figure-of-eight cerclage wire (KW group).
    [Show full text]
  • Orthopaedics Instructions: to Best Navigate the List, First Download This PDF File to Your Computer
    Orthopaedics Instructions: To best navigate the list, first download this PDF file to your computer. Then navigate the document using the bookmarks feature in the left column. The bookmarks expand and collapse. Finally, ensure that you look at the top of each category and work down to review notes or specific instructions. Bookmarks: Bookmarks: notes or specific with expandable instructions and collapsible topics As you start using the codes, it is recommended that you also check in Index and Tabular lists to ensure there is not a code with more specificity or a different code that may be more appropriate for your patient. Copyright APTA 2016, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Last Updated: 09/14/16 Contact: [email protected] Orthopaedics Disorder by site: Ankle Achilles tendinopathy ** Achilles tendinopathy is not listed in ICD10 M76.6 Achilles tendinitis Achilles bursitis M76.61 Achilles tendinitis, right leg M76.62 Achilles tendinitis, left leg ** Tendinosis is not listed in ICD10 M76.89 Other specified enthesopathies of lower limb, excluding foot M76.891 Other specified enthesopathies of right lower limb, excluding foot M76.892 Other specified enthesopathies of left lower limb, excluding foot Posterior tibialis dysfunction **Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD) is not listed in ICD10 M76.82 Posterior tibial tendinitis M76.821 Posterior tibial tendinitis, right leg M76.822 Posterior tibial tendinitis, left leg M76.89 Other specified enthesopathies of lower limb, excluding foot M76.891 Other specified enthesopathies of right lower limb,
    [Show full text]
  • (Bucked Shins) in the Flat Racing Horse: Prevalence, Diagnosis, Pathogenesis, and Associated Factors
    Journal of Dairy, Veterinary & Animal Research Mini Review Open Access A review of dorsal metacarpal disease (bucked shins) in the flat racing horse: prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and associated factors Abstract Volume 5 Issue 6 - 2017 Dorsal metacarpal disease (DMD) is the most common cause of lostdays to training S Couch,1 BD Nielsen2 and racing in Thoroughbred racehorses. Colloquially termed ‘bucked’ or ‘sore’ shins, 1Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of this initially painful condition commonly occurs in the first season of training and can Edinburgh, United Kingdom raise welfare concerns. Clinical signs include pain with digital palpation and swelling 2Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, USA on the dorsal, and sometimes dorso-medial, aspect of the third metacarpal (McIII). Periostitis and excessive growth of periosteal bone can be present as a response to Correspondence: Brian D Nielsen, Michigan State University, high strain cyclic fatigue. Whilst DMD can resolve with rest or reduced exercise, it Department of Animal Science, 474 S. Shaw Lane, East Lansing, can leave bone susceptible to future catastrophic fracture at the same site, particularly MI 48824 1225, USA, Tel 517 432 1378, Fax 517 353 1699, saucer fractures of the lamellar bone of the diaphysis. Some trainers continue to work Email [email protected] an animal through DMD, with the view that it will only happen once, but it can re- occur. Additionally, the animal is in discomfort and has a weakened skeletal system. Received: September 13, 2017 | Published: September 25, In vivo studies of the effects of cyclic strain on the skeletal system of Thoroughbreds 2017 are notoriously difficult, due to the many variables involved and in vitro studies cannot mimic true training and racing conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Medical Policy
    CLINICAL MEDICAL POLICY Noninvasive Electrical Bone Growth Stimulators Policy Name: (osteogenesis stimulators) Policy Number: MP-070-MD-PA Responsible Department(s): Medical Management Provider Notice Date: 12/15/2018 Issue Date: 01/15/2019 Effective Date: 01/15/2019 Annual Approval Date: 10/17/2019 Revision Date: N/A Products: Gateway Health℠ Medicaid Application: All participating hospitals and providers Page Number(s): 1 of 78 DISCLAIMER Gateway Health℠ (Gateway) medical policy is intended to serve only as a general reference resource regarding coverage for the services described. This policy does not constitute medical advice and is not intended to govern or otherwise influence medical decisions. POLICY STATEMENT Gateway Health℠ may provide coverage under the medical-surgical and DME benefits of the Company’s Medicaid products for medically necessary noninvasive electrical bone growth stimulators as treatment of nonunion long bone fractures or congenital pseudarthrosis. This policy is designed to address medical necessity guidelines that are appropriate for the majority of individuals with a particular disease, illness or condition. Each person’s unique clinical circumstances warrant individual consideration, based upon review of applicable medical records. (Current applicable Pennsylvania HealthChoices Agreement Section V. Program Requirements, B. Prior Authorization of Services, 1. General Prior Authorization Requirements.) Policy No. MP-070-MD-PA Page 1 of 78 DEFINITIONS Prior Authorization Review Panel - A panel of representatives from within the PA Department of Human Services who have been assigned organizational responsibility for the review, approval and denial of all PH-MCO Prior Authorization policies and procedures. Non-invasive (Osteogenic) Electrical Bone Growth Stimulator – A device that uses pulsed- electromagnetic fields, capacitative coupling or combined magnetic fields to generate a weak electric current through the target site.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Unusual Cases of Congenital Forelimb Malformations in Dogs
    animals Article Four Unusual Cases of Congenital Forelimb Malformations in Dogs Simona Di Pietro 1 , Giuseppe Santi Rapisarda 2, Luca Cicero 3,* , Vito Angileri 4, Simona Morabito 5, Giovanni Cassata 3 and Francesco Macrì 1 1 Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy; [email protected] (S.D.P.); [email protected] (F.M.) 2 Department of Veterinary Prevention, Provincial Health Authority of Catania, 95030 Gravina di Catania, Italy; [email protected] 3 Institute Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Sicily, Via G. Marinuzzi, 3, 90129 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 4 Veterinary Practitioner, 91025 Marsala, Italy; [email protected] 5 Ospedale Veterinario I Portoni Rossi, Via Roma, 57/a, 40069 Zola Predosa (BO), Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Congenital limb defects are sporadically encountered in dogs during normal clinical practice. Literature concerning their diagnosis and management in canine species is poor. Sometimes, the diagnosis and description of congenital limb abnormalities are complicated by the concurrent presence of different malformations in the same limb and the lack of widely accepted classification schemes. In order to improve the knowledge about congenital limb anomalies in dogs, this report describes the clinical and radiographic findings in four dogs affected by unusual congenital forelimb defects, underlying also the importance of reviewing current terminology. Citation: Di Pietro, S.; Rapisarda, G.S.; Cicero, L.; Angileri, V.; Morabito, Abstract: Four dogs were presented with thoracic limb deformity. After clinical and radiographic S.; Cassata, G.; Macrì, F. Four Unusual examinations, a diagnosis of congenital malformations was performed for each of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractures of Hamate: a Clinical Overview
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY (2019) 103:15–21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0543-y REVIEW Fractures of hamate: a clinical overview G. Mouzopoulos1 · C. Vlachos1 · L. Karantzalis1 · K. Vlachos1 Received: 28 June 2017 / Accepted: 20 May 2018 / Published online: 29 May 2018 © Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli 2018 Abstract Hamate fractures are exceedingly rare clinical entities. However, the diagnosis and treatment of these injuries are often delayed and can severely handicap the performance of afected laborers or athletes. This review focuses on fractures of the hamate and provides an update on the current consensus as to mechanism, diagnosis, management, and complications after such injuries. Keywords Hamate · Hook · Fracture Epidemiology the hook of the hamate [2]. If the grip is relaxed or control is lost, the fracture occurs at the end of a poor swing, as Fractures of the hamate usually occur through the hook centrifugal force is transmitted through the handle of the or body of the bone [1]. Type I fractures involve the hook racquet against the hook [7]. In golfers or baseball players, of the hamate and further are subdivided into three sub- a dubbed shot or a checked swing will fracture the hamulus types involving: base, waist, and avulsion (tip). Fractures because the butt of the club or bat will strike the hook. It has located at the base and proximal third (76%) of the hook also been described in polo and ice hockey [8]. are presented more frequently than fractures located at the Fall on an outstretched hand causing sudden forcible mid-third (13%) or the distal third (11%).
    [Show full text]
  • Fractures of the Neck of the Fifth Metacarpal Bone. Medium-Term Results in 28 Cases Treated by Percutaneous Transverse Pinning I
    Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 43 (2012) 242–245 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Injury jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/injury Fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal bone. Medium-term results in 28 cases treated by percutaneous transverse pinning V. Potenza *, R. Caterini, F. De Maio, S. Bisicchia, P. Farsetti Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Rome, Italy A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: The purpose of this study was to report the medium-term results in 28 patients affected by closed Accepted 27 October 2011 displaced fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal bone (boxer’s fracture) with an associated severe swelling of the hand, who were treated with percutaneous transverse K-wire pinning, to verify the Keywords: effectiveness of this surgical treatment. We opted for this treatment in all cases in which malrotation of Boxer’s fracture the fifth finger and volar angulation of the metacarpal head greater than 308 were associated with a Transverse pinning severe swelling of the hand. All the patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically at an average of Metacarpal neck fracture 25 months after surgery. At the final follow-up, no patient reported residual pain. All patients had full extension of the fifth finger, except two in whom we observed a limitation of the extension of the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint of about 108, without significant impairment of hand function. All patients had at least 908 flexion of the fifth MP joint and full range of motion of the interphalangeal (IP) joints.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ossification of the Metacarpal and Phalangeal Bones in Human Foetuses
    Folia Morphol. Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 329–332 Copyright © 2004 Via Medica O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E ISSN 0015–5659 www.fm.viamedica.pl The ossification of the metacarpal and phalangeal bones in human foetuses Florian Czerwiński1, Ewa Tomasik1, Małgorzata Tomasik2, Aldona Mahaczek-Kordowska1 1Department of Anatomy, Pomeranian Academy of Medicine, Szczecin, Poland 2Department of General Dentistry, Pomeranian Academy of Medicine, Szczecin, Poland [Received 4 November 2002; Revised 17 February 2004; Accepted 17 February 2004] An evaluation was made of the ossification level of the metacarpal and pha- langeal bones in human foetuses of both sexes from the 4th to the 9th month of gestation. Our results indicate that ossification of phalangeal bones 1 to 5 al- ways started at the distal end of the phalanx and endochondral ossification prevailed in the proximal phalanx of the thumb. Key words: human foetus, metacarpal bones, phalangeal bones, ossification INTRODUCTION Most human skeletal bones are ossified on a car- tilaginous base [5, 14]. This is a complex process pro- gressing dynamically in time and ossification consti- tutes the final phase of this complex process [3]. Thorough observation of the ossification of the foe- tal skeleton is made possible by means of the radio- logical method and evaluation of histological speci- mens [9]. This study presents the ossification of the metacarpal and phalangeal bones in human foetus- es at different stages of gestation. MATERIAL AND METHOD Eighty-six hands were examined taken from hu- man foetuses of both sexes aged from 4 to 9 months of gestation.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Anatomy of the Equine Musculoskeletal System
    1 CHAPTER Functional Anatomy of the Equine Musculoskeletal System ANNA DEE FAILS ANATOMIC NOMENCLATURE AND USAGE Foot Veterinary medical anatomists have been using the The foot consists of the hoof and all it encloses: the Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria, created by the Inter­ connective tissue corium (dermis), digital cushion, distal national Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical phalanx (coffin bone), most of the cartilages of the distal Nomenclature since 1968 to standardize the names of phalanx, distal interphalangeal (coffin) joint, distal part anatomical structures.46 This chapter endeavors to use the of the middle phalanx (short pastern bone), distal sesa­ most current, correct terms as outlined in that publication. moid (navicular) bone, podotrochlear bursa (navicular Nonetheless, equine practitioners need to be equally fluent bursa), several ligaments, tendons of insertion of the in older terminology, which is likely to be in wide usage common digital extensor and deep digital flexor mus­ among horse owners and equine professionals. This chap­ cles, blood vessels, and nerves. Skin between the heels is ter will provide useful and common synonyms for many also part of the foot. structures, along with their more technically correct terms. Figure 1.1 provides the directional terms for veteri­ HOOF WALL, SOLE, AND FROG nary anatomy that will be used in this chapter. With the exception of the ocular and oral cavity structures, the The hoof is continuous with the epidermis at the cor­ terms anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior are not onet, and the underlying corium of the hoof is likewise applicable to quadrupeds. continuous with the dermis of the skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Metacarpal Bone Boxer's Fracture Phalanx Scissoring Brace May Be Used During Treatment
    320 Warner Drive Lewiston, ID 83501 Boxer's Fracture Overview A boxer's fracture is a break of the metacarpal of the little finger. The metacarpals are the long bones in the hand that connect the fingers to the wrist. A boxer's fracture refers to a break at the end of the bone nearest the knuckle, which is called the metacarpal neck. Causes This type of fracture most commonly occurs when someone punches a hard surface (or another person) with a closed fist. Since most people punch in a roundhouse fashion, the first point of boney contact in a punch is the little finger metacarpal bone. The force concentrates at the metacarpal neck, leading to a fracture. Ironically, this is a rare injury in boxers because they are trained to punch with even force over the entire hand, maximizing force and minimizing injury. A boxer's fracture can also occur when a person stumbles and tries to Fifth metacarpal bone break his fall with a closed fist to the ground. Occasionally, direct trauma to the hand can also cause this injury. Boxer’s fracture Symptoms Common symptoms include pain, tenderness, and swelling around the knuckle of the little finger. Bruising and loss of knuckle contour are also common, and extending the finger may be difficult. In severely displaced fractures, the fingers may overlap (or scissor) when they are flexed. Phalanx Treatment Most boxer's fractures can be treated with a cast or brace to stabilize the fracture while it heals. If the knuckle is severely deformed, a procedure called a Scissoring closed reduction may be needed to push the fracture back into proper position before casting.
    [Show full text]
  • Fracture of the Hamate with Interposition of the Base of 5Th
    Journal of Case Reports and Studies Volume 5 | Issue 1 ISSN: 2348-9820 Case Report Open Access Fracture of the Hamate with Interposition of the Base of 5th Metacarpal, a Frequently Missed Injury Dabboussi NA, Fakih RR, Al husari H and Abtar HK* Department of Surgery, Makassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon *Corresponding author: Abtar HK, Makassed General Hospital, P.O. Box: 11-6301 Riad EI-Solh, 11072210, Beirut, Lebanon, Tel: +961 70 858658, +961 1858658, E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Dabboussi NA, Fakih RR, Al husari H, Abtar HK (2017) Fracture of the Hamate with Interposition of the Base of 5th Metacarpal, a Frequently Missed Injury. J Case Rep Stud 5(1): 104. doi: 10.15744/2348- 9820.5.104 Received Date: December 26, 2016 Accepted Date: February 25, 2017 Published Date: February 28, 2017 Abstract We report a case of hamate fracture in the coronal plane with interposition of the base of 5th metacarpal bone. This injury is frequently missed and may results in increasing rate of morbidity and mal-union. In this article, the approach to this type of injuries, the diagnostic modalities, and the management will be discussed with review of the literature. Keywords: Hamate Bone; Fracture-Dislocation; Missed Injury List of Abbreviations: Three Dimensional Computed Tomography: 3D CT Scan Introduction Hamate fracture represents a small percentage of all carpal bone fractures [1], it is rare to the point that the incidence of its subtypes was not established. Hamate fractures with dislocation of fifth metacarpal are frequently missed by conventional x-rays, they need special views to be diagnosed, and the fracture architecture is best seen on three dimensional computed tomography (3D CT scan) [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Metacarpal Fractures: Practical Methods for Measurement of Shortening, Angulation, and Malrotation
    J Orthop Spine Trauma. 2020 March; 6(1): 9-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jost.v6i1.4535 Educational Corner Metacarpal Fractures: Practical Methods for Measurement of Shortening, Angulation, and Malrotation Rohollah Khajeh 1, Behzad Enayati1, Farzad Vosughi2, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi 3,* 1 Fellowship of Hand Surgery, Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2 Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3 Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran *Corresponding author: Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98-2161192767, Email: [email protected] Received: 09 October 2019; Revised: 15 December 2019; Accepted: 17 January 2020 Keywords: Metacarpus; Fractures, Bone; Hand Deformities, Acquired Citation: Khajeh R, Enayati B, Vosughi F, Mortazavi SMJ. Metacarpal Fractures: Practical Methods for Measurement of Shortening, Angulation, and Malrotation. J Orthop Spine Trauma 2020; 6(1): 9-13. Background different metacarpal fractures. Articular fractures involving less than 20% of the joint Phalangeal, distal radius, and metacarpal fractures are surface and nondisplaced or minimally displaced shaft the most frequent upper limb fractures, respectively (1). fractures, without significant angulation, malrotation, or The incidence of metacarpal fractures in the United States shortening are treated with immobilization in the of America (USA) is 13.6 among every 100000 population intrinsic plus position (6). Bony apposition of at least 50% annually (2). Metacarpal fractures compose 30-40 percent and maximal bone shortening of 5 mm is acceptable.
    [Show full text]