RST Bibliography from the RST web site (http://www.sfu.ca/rst)

Last updated: April 3, 2014

Abelen, Eric, Gisela Redeker & Sandra A. Thompson. 1993. The rhetorical structure of US-American and Dutch fund-raising letters. Text 13(3). 323-350. Abrahamson, Jennie A. & Victoria Rubin. 2012. Discourse structure differences in lay and professional health communication. Journal of Documentation 68(6). 826-851. Afantenos, Stergos D. 2007. Some reflections on the task of content determination in the context of multi-document summarization of evolving events. In Galia Angelova, Kalina Bontcheva, Ruslan Mitkov, Nicolas Nicolov & Nikolai Nikolov (eds.), Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2007) (pp. 12-16). Borovets, Bulgaria: INCOMA. Afantenos, Stergos D., Pascal Denis, Philippe Muller & Laurence Danlos. 2010, 3578-3584. Learning recursive segments for discourse parsing. International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Malta. Afantenos, Stergos D., Irene Doura, Eleni Kapellou & Vangelis Karkaletsis. 2004. Exploiting cross- document relations for multi-document evolving summarization. In G. A Vouros & T. Panayiotopoulos (eds.), Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of 3rd Hellenic Conference on AI, SETN 2004 (pp. 410-419). Berlin: Springer. Afantenos, Stergos D. & Nicolas Hernandez. 2009. What's in a message? Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition (pp. 18-25). Athens, Greece. Afantenos, Stergos D., Vangelis Karkaletsis & Panagiotis Stamatopoulos. 2005. Summarization from medical documents: a survey. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 33(2). 157-177. Afantenos, Stergos D., Vangelis Karkaletsis, Panagiotis Stamatopoulos & Constantin Halatsis. 2008. Using synchronic and diachronic relations for summarizing multiple documents describing evolving events. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 30(3). 183-226. Ahmed, Nabeel, Sharifulah Khan, Khalid Latif & Asad Masood. 2008. Extracting semantic annotations and their correlation with document components. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET) (pp. 32-37). Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Aker, Ahmet. 2014. Entity Type Modeling for Multi-Document Summarization: Generating Descriptive Summaries of Geo-Located Entities. University of SheffieldThesis Type. Alexandropoulos, George. 2013. Stylistic approach of Julian the Emperor and Gregory Nazianzean. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 6. 1-13. Allen, R. B., Y. J. Wu & J. Luo. 2005. Interactive causal schematics for qualitative scientific explanations. In Digital Libraries: Implementing Strategies and Sharing Experiences, Proceedings (Vol. 3815, pp. 411-415). Alonso i Alemany, Laura & Maria Fuentes Fort. 2003. Integrating cohesion and coherence for automatic summarization. Proceedings of EACL'03 Student Research Workshop (pp. 1-8). Budapest, Hungary.

Page 1 of 58

Altshuler, Daniel. 2013. Discourse transparency and the meaning of temporal locating adverbs. Natural Language Semantics. in press. Aluíso, Sandra M., Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo & MS Duran. 2014. New corpora for "new" challenges in Portuguese processing. In Tony Berber Sardinha & Telma de Lurdes São Bento Ferreira (eds.), Working with Portuguese Corpora. London: Bloomsbury. Alves, Fabio & José Luiz Gonçalves. 2013. Investigating the conceptual-procedural distinction in the translation process. Target - International Journal of Translation Studies 25(1). 107-124. André, Elisabeth & Thomas Rist. 1996. Coping with temporal constraints in multimedia presentation planning. Proceedings of Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 142-147). Portland, Oregon. Andriessen, Jerry, Koenraad de Smedt & Michael Zock. 1996. Discourse Planning: Experimental and modeling approaches. In Ton Dijkstra & Koenraad de Smedt (eds.), Computational Psycholinguistics: Symbolic and Network Models of Language Processing (pp. 247-278). London: Taylor and Francis. Androutsopoulos, Ion, Gerasimos Lampouras & Dimitrios Galanis. 2013. Generating natural language descriptions from OWL ontologies: The NaturalOWL System. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 48. 671-715. Androutsopoulos, I., D. Spiliotopoulos, K. Stamatakis, A. Dimitromanolaki, V. Karkaletsis & C. D. Spyropoulos. 2002. Symbolic authoring for multilingual natural language generation. In Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2308, pp. 131-142). Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2001. A estrutura retorica de textos orais e de textos escritos (Rhetorical structure of oral and written texts). Acta Scientiarum 23(1). 19-25. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2004. Estrutura retórica e articulação de orações em narrativas orais e em narrativas escritas do português (Rhetorical structure and clause combining in oral narratives and written narratives in Brazilian Portuguese). Araraquara, Brazil: UNESPThesis Type. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2011. Expression of purpose rhetorical relation in formal speeches and oral interviews. Acta Scientiarum 9(3). 206-215. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2012. Expression of cause, evidence, justify and motivation rhetorical relations by causal hypotactic clauses in Brazilian Portuguese. Acta Scientiarum 34(2). 253-268. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2013. A RST e os estudos da língua falada: Uma investigação em elocuções do português brasileiro. Proceedings of the IV Workshop on RST and Text Studies (pp. 20-29). Fortaleza, Brazil. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato & C. Takahashi. 2010. Atuação da relação retórica de elaboração na macroestrutura e na microestrutura de elocuções formais (Performance of elaboration rhetorical relation in macrostructure and microstructure of formal elocutions). Calidoscópio 8(3). 174-180. Arens, Yigal. 1992. Multimedia Presentation Planning as an Extension of Text Planning. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 587. 278-280. Arens, Yigal & Eduard Hovy. 1995. The Design of a Model-Based Multimedia Interaction Manager. Artificial Intelligence Review 9(2-3). 167-188.

Page 2 of 58

Argamon, Shlomo, Jeff Dodick & Paul Chase. 2008. Language use reflects scientific methodology: A corpus-based study of peer-reviewed journal articles. Scientometrics 75(2). 203-238. Asher, Nicholas, Farah Benamara & Yvette Yannick Mathieu. 2009. Appraisal of opinion expressions in discourse. Linguisticae Investigationes 32(2). 279-292. Asher, Nicholas, Laurent Prévot & Laure Vieu. 2007. Setting the background in discourse. Discours 1. [Online], Put online on 03 April 2008. URL : http://discours.revues.org//index2301.html. Consulted on 2008 May 2008. Azar, Moshe. 1999. Argumentative text as rhetorical structure: An application of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Argumentation 13(1). 97-144. Babaii, Esmat. 2007. Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. Discourse and Society 18(2). 223-237. Baker, Michael, Françoise Détienne & Jean-Marie Burkhardt. 2013. Quality of collaboration in design: Articulating multiple dimensions and viewpoints. 1st Interdisciplinary Innovation Conference. Paris, France. Baldridge, Jason, Nicholas Asher & Julie Hunter. 2007. Annotation for and robust parsing of discourse structure on unrestricted texts. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft(26). 213-239. Ballard, D. Lee , Robert J. Conrad & Robert E. Longacre. 1971. Interclausal relations. Foundations of Language 7(1). 70-118. Ballard, D. Lee, Robert J. Conrad & Robert E. Longacre. 1971. More on the Deep and Surface Grammar of Interclausal Relations. Santa Ana, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Banik, Eva & Alan Lee. 2008. A study of parentheticals in discousre corpora: Implications for NLG systems. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08) (pp. 2668-2675). Marrakech, Morocco. Bärenfänger, Maja, Mirco Hilbert, Henning Lobin, Harald Lüngen & Csilla Puskás. 2006. Cues and constraints for the relational discourse analysis of complex text types: The role of logical and generic document structure. In Candace L Sidner, John Harpur, Anton Benz & Peter Kühnlein (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse (pp. 27-34). Maynooth, Ireland. Bärenfänger, Maja, Henning Lobin, Harald Lüngen & Mirco Hilbert. 2006. Using OWL ontologies in discourse parsing. Proceedings of the Workshop of Ontologies in Text Technology. Osnabrück, Germany. Barzilay, Regina & Mirella Lapata. 2005. Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 141-148). Ann Arbor, MI. Barzilay, Regina & Mirella Lapata. 2008. Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Computational Linguistics 34(1-34). Bateman, John. 1990. Finding translation equivalents: An application of grammatical metaphor. Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'90) (Vol. 2, pp. 13-18). Helsinki, Finland.

Page 3 of 58

Bateman, John. 2008. Basic techniques and problems in multimodal analysis. Retrieved June 22, 2012, from http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/anglistik/langpro/webspace/jb/repository/talks/session- statics.pdf Bateman, John. 2009. Discourse across semiotic modes. In Jan Renkema (ed.), Discourse, of course (pp. 55-66). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Bateman, John & Judy Delin. 2005. Rhetorical structure theory. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 589-596). Oxford: Elsevier. Bateman, John, Judy Delin & Patrick Allen. 2000. Constraints on layout in multimodal document generation. Proceedings of First International Natural Language Generation Conference, Workshop on Coherence in Generated Multimedia. Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. Bateman, John, Thomas Kamps, Jörg Kleinz & Klaus Reichenberger. 2001. Towards constructive text, diagram, and layout generation for information presentation. Computational Linguistics 27(3). 409- 449. Bateman, John & Klaas Jan Rondhuis. 1997. Coherence relations: Towards a general specification. Discourse Processes 24. 3-49. Baumgarten, Nicole. 2007. Converging conventions? Macrosyntactic conjunction with English and and German und. Text & Talk 27(2). 139-170. Beekman, John & John Callow. 1974. Translating the Word of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House. Bell, Mark A. 2001. Online notes on the structure of argument essays. Retrieved June 25, 2004, from http://www.users.bigpond.com/m487396/Argument/essay_notes.htm Benamara, Farah, Vladimir Popescu, Baptiste Chardon, Nicholas Asher & Yannick Mathieu. 2013. Assessing opinions in texts: Does discourse really matter? In Maite Taboada & Radoslava Trnavac (eds.), Nonveridicality and Evaluation: Theoretical, Computational and Corpus Approaches (pp. 127- 150). Leiden: Brill. Benwell, Bethan. 1999. The organisation of knowledge in British university tutorial discourse: Issues, pedagogic discourse strategies and disciplinary identity. Pragmatics 9(4). 535-565. Berber Sardinha, Tony. 2006. Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. Computational Linguistics 32(2). 283-286. Bernárdez, Enrique. 1995. Teoría y epistemología del texto. Madrid: Cátedra. Berzlánovich, Ildikó, Markus Egg & Gisela Redeker. 2008. Coherence structure and lexical cohesion in expository and persuasive texts. Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse (pp. 19- 26). Potsdam, Germany. Berzlánovich, Ildikó & Gisela Redeker. 2012. Genre-dependent interaction of coherence and lexical cohesion in written discourse. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(1). 183-208. Beveridge, Michael & John Fox. 2006. Automatic generation of spoken dialogue from medical plans and ontologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 39(5). 482-499.

Page 4 of 58

Beveridge, Michael, John Fox & David Milward. 2003. Speech interfaces for point-of-care guideline systems. In Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Proceedings (Vol. 2780, pp. 76-80). Beveridge, Martin & David Milward. 2003. Combining task descriptions and ontological knowledge for adaptive dialogue. In Text, Speech and Dialogue, Proceedings (Vol. 2807, pp. 341-348). Bille, Philip. 2005. A survey on tree edit distance and related problems. Theoretical Computer Science 337(1-3). 217-239. Binnick, Robert. 2009. Altaic hypotaxis and the expression of rhetorical relations. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 34. Blakemore, Diane. 2007. Or'-parentheticals, 'that is'-parentheticals and the pragmatics of reformulation. Journal of Linguistics 43(2). 311-339. Blühdorn, Hardarik. 2008. Subordination and coordination in syntax, semantics and discourse: Evidence from the study of connectives. In Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds.), 'Subordination' versus 'Coordination' in Sentence and Text: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (pp. 59-85). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Bocaniala, Cosmin Danut. 2000. The textual idea and its relationship to discourse structure. The Annals of University “Dunarea de Jos” of Galati, Fascicle III 2000(1). 75-79. Borisova, Irina & Gisela Redeker. 2010. Same and Elaboration relations in the Discourse Graphbank. Proceedings of SIGDIAL 2010: the 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 63-66). Tokyo, Japan. Borra, Allan, Almira Mae Diola, Joan Tiffany T. Ong Lopez, Phoebus Ferdiel Torralba & Sherwin So. 2010. Using Rhetorical Structure Theory in automatic text summarization for Marcu-authored documents. Proceedings of the 10th Philippine Computing Science Congress (pp. 107-113). Ateneo de Davao University, Philippines. Borst, Timo. 2006. Ontologien zur semantischen Auszeichnung digitaler Lernmaterialien (Technical Report). Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology: FernUniversität in Hagen, Germany. Boscolo, P. 1995. The Cognitive Approach to Writing and Writing Instruction - a Contribution to a Critical-Appraisal. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition 14(4). 343-366. Bosma, Wauter E. 2005. Extending answers using discourse structure. Proceedings of RANLP Workshop on Crossing Barriers in Text Summarization Research (pp. 2-9). Bosma, Wauter E. 2005. Query-based summarization using Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of 15th Meeting of CLIN (pp. 29-44). Bosma, Wauter E. 2008. Discourse oriented summarization. Enschede: University of TwenteThesis Type. Bouayad-Agha, Nadjet. 2000. Using an abstract rhetorical representation to generate a variety of pragmatically congruent texts. Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'00), Student Workshop (pp. 16-22). Hong Kong.

Page 5 of 58

Bouayad-Agha, Nadjet, Richard Power & Donia Scott. 2000. Can text structure be incompatible with rhetorical structure? Proceedings of International Conference in Natural Language Generation (INLG-2000) (pp. 194-200). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. Bourse, Sarah & Patrick Saint-Dizier. 2012. A repository of rules and lexical resources for discourse structure analysis: The case of explanation structures. Proceedings of the Conference on Language Resources and Annotation (LREC) (pp. 2778-2785). Istanbul, Turkey. Bouwer, A. 1998. An ITS for Dutch punctuation. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. 1452, pp. 224- 233). Bruhn de Garavito, Joyce. 2006. Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. University of Toronto Quarterly 75(1). 184-186. Bu, Qinghan, Daisuke Kawahara & Sadao Kurohashi. 2014. Japanese discourse structure analysis based on automatically acquired large-scale knowledge. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Speech Processing Society. Sapporo, Japan. Burstein, Jill, Daniel Marcu & Kevin Knight. 2003. Finding the WRITE stuff: Automatic identification of discourse structure in student essays. Ieee Intelligent Systems 18(1). 32-39. Burstein, Jill C., Lisa Braden-Harder, Martin Chodorow, Bruce A. Kaplan, Karen Kukich, Chi Lu, Donald A. Rock & Susanne Wolff. 2001. System and method for computer-based automatic essay scoring. United States Patent 6,181,909: Educational Testing Services. Burstein, Jill C., Lisa Braden-Harder, Martin S. Chodorow, Bruce A. Kaplan, Karen Kukich, Chi Lu, Donald A. Rock & Susanne Wolff. 2002. System and method for computer-based automatic essay scoring. United States Patent 6,366,759: Educational Testing Service. Burstein, Jill C., Karen Kukich, Slava Andreyev & Daniel Marcu. 2001. Towards automatic classification of discourse elements in essays. Proceedings of 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'01). Toulouse, France. Burstein, Jill C., Karen Kukich, Susanne Wolfe, Chi Lu & Martin S. Chodorow. 1998. Enriching automated essay scoring using discourse marking. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (ACL- COLING'98) Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 15-21). Montréal, Canada. Burstein, Jill C. & Daniel Marcu. 2003. A machine learning approach for identification of thesis and conclusion statements in student essays. Computers and the Humanities 37(4). 455-467. Busch, Michael. 2005. Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. Retrieved May, 2005, from http://www.linguistlist.org/issues/16/16-1688.html Caelen, Jean & Anne Xuereb. 2014. Dialogue analysis: Pragmatic and rhetorical aspects. In Manuel Rebuschi, Martine Batt, Gerhard Heinzmann, Franck Lihoreau, Michel Musiol & Alain Trognon (eds.), Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics: Dialogue, Rationality, and Formalism (pp. 283-313). Berlin: Springer. Canestrelli, Anneloes. 2013. Small words, big effects? Subjective versus objective causal connectives in discourse processing. Utrecth: University of UtretchtThesis Type.

Page 6 of 58

Carbonel, Thiago Ianez, Sandra S. Collovini, Jorge César Coelho, Juliana Thiesen Fuchs, Lucia Helena Machado Rino & Renata Vieira. 2007. Summ-it: Um corpus anotado com informações discursivas visando à sumarização automática. Proceedings of XXVII Congresso da SBC: V Workshop em Tecnologia da Informação e da Linguagem Humana – TIL (pp. 1605-1614). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Carbonel, Thiago Ianez, E.R.M. Seno, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo, Jorge César Coelho, Sandra S. Collovini, Lucia Helena Machado Rino & Renata Vieira. 2006. A two-step summarizer of Brazilian Portuguese texts. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information and Human Language Technology (TIL). Ribeirão Preto-SP, Brazil. Carenini, Giuseppe, Fabio Pianesi, Marco Ponzi & Oliviero Stock. 1993. Natural language generation and hypertext access. Applied Artificial Intelligence 7(2). 135-164. Carenini, Giuseppe, Marco Ponzi & Oliviero Stock. 1990. Combining natural language and hypermedia as new means for information access. Proceedings of Fifth European Conference of Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE '90). Urbino, Italy. Carlson, Lynn, John Conroy, Daniel Marcu, Dianne O'Leary, Mary Ellen Okurowski, Anthony Taylor & William Wong. 2001. An empirical study of the relation between abstracts, extracts, and the discourse structure of texts. Proceedings of Document Understanding Conference (DUC-2001). New Orleans, Louisiana. Carlson, Lynn & Daniel Marcu. 2001. Discourse Tagging Manual. Unpublished manuscript, http://www.isi.edu/~marcu/discourse/tagging-ref-manual.pdf. Carlson, Lynn, Daniel Marcu & Mary Ellen Okurowski. 2001. Building a discourse tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of 2nd SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Eurospeech 2001. Aalborg, Denmark. Carlson, Lynn, Daniel Marcu & Mary Ellen Okurowski. 2002. RST Discourse Treebank, LDC2002T07 [Corpus]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. Carlson, Lynn, Daniel Marcu & Mary Ellen Okurowski. 2003. Building a discourse tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. In Jan van Kuppevelt & Ronnie Smith (eds.), Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 85-112). Berlin: Springer. Caro, S. & A. Bisseret. 1997. Using weakening paralinguistic organizers in electronic documents: an experimental approach. Travail Humain 60(4). 409-437. Cassell, Justine, Yukiko Nakano, Timothy W. Bickmore, Candace L. Sidner & Charles Rich. 2001. Non- verbal cues for discourse structure. Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 17-19). Toulouse, France. Cawsey, Alison. 1990. Generating explanatory discourse. In Robert Dale, Chris Mellish & Michael Zock (eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation (pp. 75-101). London: Academic Press. Cawsey, Alison. 1991. Using plausible inference rules in description planning. Proceedings of 5th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'91) (pp. 119-124). Berlin, Germany.

Page 7 of 58

Cawsey, Alison. 1995. Participating in Explanatory Dialogues - Interpreting and Responding to Questions in Context - Moore,Jd. Computational Linguistics 21(3). 422-424. Chafai, N. E., C. Pelachaud, D. Pele & G. Breton. 2006. Gesture expressivity modulations in an ECA application. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, Proceedings (Vol. 4133, pp. 181-192). Chafe, Wallace. 1996. Beyond beads on a string and branches on a tree. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 49-65). Stanford, CA: CSLI. Chafe, Wallace. 2002. Searching for meaning in language - A memoir. Historiographia Linguistica 29(1- 2). 245-261. Chan, S. W. K. 2000. Using heterogeneous linguistic knowledge in local coherence identification for information retrieval. Journal of Information Science 26(5). 313-328. Chan, S. W. K. 2004. Automatic discourse structure detection using shallow textual continuity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61(1). 138-164. Chan, S. W. K. 2006. Beyond keyword and cue-phrase matching: A sentence-based abstraction technique for information extraction. Decision Support Systems 42(2). 759-777. Chan, Samuel W. K., Tom B. Y. Lai, W. J. Gao & Benjamin K. T'sou. 2000. Mining discourse markers for Chinese textual summarization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the NAACL-ANLP Workshop on Automatic Text Summarization, Seattle, WA. Chardon, Baptiste, Farah Benamara, Yvette Yannick Mathieu, Vladimir Popescu & Nicholas Asher. 2013. Measuring the effect of discourse structure on sentiment analysis. Proceeding of the 14th international conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing) (Vol. 7817 LNCS, pp. 25-37). Samos, Greece. Chaturvedi, Snigdha, Vittorio Castelli, Radu Florian, Ramesh M. Nallapati & Hema Raghavan. 2014. Joint question clustering and relevance prediction for open domain non-factoid question answering. Proceedings of International World Wide Web (pp. 503-513). Seoul, Korea. Cheng, Hua. 2000. Experimenting with the interaction between aggregation and text structuring. Proceedings of ANLP-NAACL 2000 Student Research Workshop (pp. 1-6). Seattle, Washington. Cheng, Hua & Chris Mellish. 2000. Capturing the interaction between aggregation and text planning in two generation systems. Proceedings of First International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG'00) (pp. 186-193). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. Chengcheng, Li. 2010. Automatic text summarization based on Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010) (pp. V13-595-598). Taiyuan, China. Chenlo, José M., Alexander Hogenboom & David E. Losada. 2013. Sentiment-based ranking of blog posts using Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of NLDB 2013, 18th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (pp. 13-24). Manchester, UK. Chiarcos, Christian & Olga Krasavina. 2005. Rhetorical distance revisited: A pilot study. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2005. Birmingham, UK.

Page 8 of 58

Chiarcos, Christian & Olga Krasavina. 2008. Rhetorical distance revisited: A parametrized approach. In Anton Benz & Peter Kühnlein (eds.), Constraints in Discourse (pp. 97–115). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Chiarcos, Christian & Manfred Stede. 2004. Salience-driven text planning. In Natural Language Generation. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Natural Language Generation (pp. 21-30). Berlin: Springer. Chotimongkol, Ananlada. 2008. Learning the structure of task-oriented conversations from the corpus of in-domain dialogs. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon UniversityThesis Type. Chuang, W. T. & J. Yang. 2000. Text summarization by sentence segment extraction using machine learning algorithms. In Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Proceedings (Vol. 1805, pp. 454-457). Chuy, Maria & Fabienne Rondelli. 2010. Traitement des contraintes linguistiques et cognitives dans la construction de la cohérence textuelle (Processing of linguistic and cognitive constraints during construction of textual coherence). Langages 177(MARCH). 83-111. Cohn, Neil. 2014. You're a good structure, Charlie Brown: The distribution of narrative categories in comic strips. Cognitive Science. in press. Colineau, Nathalie, Cécile Paris & Keith Vander Linden. 2013. The pragmatic web: addressing complex communication in public administration using tailored delivery. SIGDOC '13 Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on Design of communication (pp. 23-32). Greenville, NC. Colonna, Saveria, Michel Charolles, Laure Sarda & Joël Pynte. 2013. Effect on comprehension of preposed versus postposed adverbial phrases. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. in press. Cornish, Francis. 1989. Discourse structure and anaphora: Written and conversational English (review article). Lingua 79(2-3). 229-243. Cornish, Francis. 2009. Inter-sentential anaphora and cohrence relations in discourse: A perfect match. Language Sciences 31. 572-592. Cornish, Francis. 2009. Le rôle des anaphores dans la mise en place des relations de cohérence dans le discours: l'hypothèse de J.R. Hobbs. Journal of French Language Studies 19(2). 159-181. Cornish, Francis. 2009. Relations de cohérence et fonctionnement des anaphores (RCFA) (Présentation). Journal of French Language Studies 19(2). 151-157. Corston, Simon & Miguel Cardoso de Campos. 2000. Automatically recognizing the discourse structure of a body of text. United States Patent 6,112,168: Microsoft Corporation. Corston-Oliver, Simon. 1998. Beyond string matching and cue phrases: Improving efficiency and coverage in discourse analysis. Proceedings of AAAI 1998 Spring Symposium Series, Intelligent Text Summarization (pp. 9-15). Madison, Wisconsin. Corston-Oliver, Simon. 1998. Identifying the linguistic correlates of rhetorical relations. Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers, COLING/ACL '98 (pp. 8-14). Corston-Oliver, Simon. 2000. Using decision trees to select the grammatical relation of a noun phrase. Proceedings of 1st SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. Hong Kong.

Page 9 of 58

Corston-Oliver, Simon & William B Dolan. 1999. Less is more: Eliminating index terms from subordinate clauses. Proceedings of 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'99) (pp. 349-356). College Park, Maryland. Costetchi, Eugeniu. 2013. Towards a discourse model for knowledge elicitation. Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop Associated with RANLP 2013 (pp. 38-44). Hissar, Bulgaria. Cox, Richard, Michael O'Donnell & Jon Oberlander. 1999. Dynamic versus static hyperedia in museum education: An evaluation of ILEX the Intelligent Labelling Explorer. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AI-ED99) (pp. 181-188). Le Mans, France. Cristea, Dan. 2000. An incremental discourse parser architecture. In Natural Language Processing - NLP 2000: Second International Conference (pp. 162-175). Patras, Greece: Springer. Cristea, Dan. 2003. The relationship between discourse structure and referentiality in Veins Theory. In W. Menzel & C. Vertan (eds.), Natural Language Processing between Linguistic Inquiry and System Engineering. Iasi, Romania: A.I. Cuza University Publishing House. Cristea, Dan. 2005. Motivations and implications of Veins Theory. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Natural Language Understanding and Cognitive Science (pp. 32-44). Miami, FL. Cristea, Dan, Nancy Ide & Daniel Marcu. 1999. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on the Relation of Discourse/Dialogue Structure and Reference. College Park, MD: ACL. Cristea, Dan, Nancy Ide, Daniel Marcu & Valentin Tablan. 2000. Discourse structure and coreference: An empirical study. The 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'00) (pp. 208-214). Saarbrücken, Germany. Cristea, Dan, Nancy Ide & Laurent Romary. 1998. Veins Theory: A model of global discourse cohesion and coherence. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (ACL-98/COLING-98) (pp. 281-285). Montréal, Canada. Cristea, Dan, O. Postolache & L. Pistol. 2005. Summarisation through discourse structure. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (Vol. 3406, pp. 632-644). Cui, Songren. 1986. A Comparison of English and Chinese Expository Rhetorical Structures. UCLAThesis Type. Cunha, Gustavo Ximenes. 2010. Estudo sobre a identificação da hierarquia temática (Study on the identification of thematic hierarchy). Acta Scientiarum 32(2). 241-246. Curteanu, Neculai. 2013. Natural Language Parsing with the Segmentation-Cohesion-Dependency Strategy and Linguistic Theory. Chisinau, Moldova: Academy of Sciences of MoldovaThesis Type. da Cunha, Iria. 2008. Hacia un modelo lingüístico de resumen automático de atículos médicos en español. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu FabraThesis Type. da Cunha, Iria. 2013. A symbolic corpus-based approach to detect and solve discourse markers ambiguity. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing). Samos, Greece.

Page 10 of 58 da Cunha, Iria & Mikel Iruskieta. 2010. Comparing rhetorical structures in different languages: The influence of translation strategies. Discourse Studies 12(5). 563-598. da Cunha, Iria, Eric San Juan, Juan Manuel Torres-Moreno, María Teresa Cabré & Gerardo Sierra. 2012. A symbolic approach for automatic detection of nuclearity and rhetorical relations among intra- sentence discourse segments in Spanish. Proceedings of CICLing (pp. 462-474). New Delhi, India. da Cunha, Iria, Eric San Juan, Juan Manuel Torres-Moreno, Marina Lloberes & Irene Castellón. 2010. DiSeg: Un segmentador discursivo automático para el español. Conferencia de la Sociedad Española para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural. Valencia, Spain. da Cunha, Iria, Eric San Juan, Juan Manuel Torres-Moreno, Marina Lloberes & Irene Castellón. 2011. DiSeg 1.0: The first system for Spanish discourse segmentation. Expert Systems with Applications 39(2). 1671-1678. da Cunha, Iria & Juan Manuel Torres-Moreno. 2010. Automatic discourse segmentation: Review and perspectives. Proceedings of International Workshop on African Human Language Technologies. Djibouti. da Cunha, Iria, Juan Manuel Torres-Moreno & Gerardo Sierra. 2011. On the development of the RST Spanish Treebank. Proceedings of the Fifth Language and Annotation Workshop (LAW V) (pp. 1-10). Portland, OR. da Cunha, Iria, Leo Wanner & María Teresa Cabré. 2007. Summarization of specialized discourse - The case of medical articles in Spanish. Terminology 13(2). 249-286. Dahlgren, Kathleen. 1998. Lexical marking and the recovery of discourse structure. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 65-71). Montréal, Canada. Dale, Robert. 1991. The role of punctuation in discourse structure. Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium on Discourse Structure in Natural Language Understanding and Generation (pp. 13-14). Asilomar, CA. Dale, Robert, Eduard Hovy, Dietmar Rösner & Oliviero Stock (eds.). 1992. Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation. Berlin: Springer. Dale, Robert, Chris Mellish & Michael Zock (eds.). 1990. Current Research in Natural Language Generation. London: Academic Press. Dale, Robert, Jon Oberlander, Maria Milosavljevic & Alistair Knott. 1998. Integrating Natural Language Generation and Hypertext to produce dynamic documents. Interacting with Computers 11(2). 109- 135. Dalianis, H. 1992. A Method for Validating a Conceptual-Model by Natural-Language Discourse Generation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 593. 425-444. Dalianis, H. 1999. Aggregation in natural language generation. Computational Intelligence 15(4). 384- 414. Danlos, Laurence. 2006. Capacité générative forte de RST, SDRT et des DAG de dépendances pour le discours. Traitement Automatique des Langues 47(2). 169-198.

Page 11 of 58

Danlos, Laurence. 2007. D-STAG: un formalisme pour le discours basé sur les TAG synchrones. Proceedings of Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles 2007 (pp. 389-398). Toulousse, France. Danlos, Laurence, Diego Antolinos-Basso, Chloé Braud & Charlotte Roze. 2012. Vers le FDTB: French Discourse Treebank. Proceedings of Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles (TALN) (pp. 471-478). Grenoble, France. Danlos, Laurence & Guy Lapalme. 1999. What is a rhetorical relation? An experiment combining two text generators. Proceedings of AISB Workshop on Reference Architecture and Data Standards for Natural Language Processing (pp. 1-7). Edinburgh, UK. Daradoumis, Thanasis. 1996. Towards a representation of the rhetorical structure of interrupted exchanges. In Giovanni Adorni & Michael Zock (eds.), Trends in Natural Language Generation: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective (pp. 106-124). Berlin: Springer. Daradoumis, Thanasis, Martha María Arguedas Lafuente & F. Xhafa. 2013. Building intelligent emotion awareness for improving collaborative e-learning. 5th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS 2013). Los Alamitos, CA. Dargnat, Mathilde. 2008. Constructionnalité des parataxes conditionnelles. In Jacques Durand, Benoît Habert & Bernard Laks (eds.), Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française - CMLF'08. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. Dargnat, Mathilde & Jacques Jayez. 2010. La cohésion parataxique: une approche constructionnelle. In M.-J Béguelin (ed.), La Parataxe, Structures, marquages et explications discursives (pp. 61-93). Berne: Peter Lang. Das, Debopam & Maite Taboada. 2013. Explicit and implicit coherence relations: A corpus study. Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Victoria, BC. Das, Monali & Amba Kulkarni. 2013. Discourse level tagger for Mahabhasya - A Sanskrit commentary on Panini's Grammar. Proceedings of ICON, 10th International Conference on Natural Language Processing. Noida, India. Dascalu, Mihai. 2013. Computational discourse analysis. In Mihai Dascalu (ed.), Analyzing Discourse and Text Complexity for Learning and Collaboration (pp. 53-77). Berlin: Springer. Daumé, Hal, III & Daniel Marcu. 2002. A noisy-channel model for document compression. Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02) (pp. 449-456). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. de Carolis, Berardina. 1998. Introducing reactivity in adaptive Hypertext generation. Proceedings of 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'98) (pp. 682-683). Brighton, UK. de Carolis, Berardina. 1999. Generating mixed-initiative Hypertexts: A reactive approach. Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'99) (pp. 71-78). Los Angeles, California. de Carolis, Berardina, Catherine Pelachaud & Isabella Poggi. 2000. Verbal and nonverbal discourse planning. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Workshop on Achieving Human-Like Behaviour in Interactive Animated Agents. Barcelona, Spain.

Page 12 of 58 de Rosis, F., Floriana Grasso & D. C. Berry. 1999. Refining instructional text generation after evaluation. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 17(1). 1-36. De Silva, Nishadi. 2005. A narrative approach to technical document construction. Proceedings of PREP 2005. Lancaster, United Kingdom. De Silva, Nishadi. 2007. A Narrative-Based Collaborative Writing Tool for Constructing Coherent Technical Documents. University of SouthamptonThesis Type. De Silva, Nishadi & Peter Henderson. 2005. Computer support for narrative structures. Proceedings of Computers and Writing 2005. Stanford University, CA. De Silva, Nishadi & Peter Henderson. 2005. Narrative support for technical documents: Formalising Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS). Miami, Fl. De Silva, Nishadi & Peter Henderson. 2007. Narrative-based writing for coherent technical documents. Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication (pp. 208- 215). El Paso, TX. De Silva, Nishadi & Hala Skaf-Molli. 2006. Narratives to preserve coherence in collaborative writing. Proceedings of The Eighth International Workshop on Collaborative Editing Systems. Banff, Canada. Decat, María Beatriz Nascimento. 2010. Relações retóricas e funções textual-discursivas na articulação de orações no português brasileiro em uso (Rhetorical relations and textual-discourse functions in clause combining in Brazilian Portuguese). Calidoscópio 8(3). 167-173. Degand, Liesbeth. 1998. On classifying connectives and coherence relations. Proceedings of COLING- ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 29-35). Montréal, Canada. Degand, Liesbeth. 2000. Causal connectives or causal prepositions? Discursive constraints. Journal of Pragmatics 32(6). 687-707. Degand, Liesbeth, Nathalie Lefévre & Yves Bestgen. 1999. The impact of connectives and anaphoric expressions on expository discourse comprehension. Document Design 1(1). 39-51. Degand, Liesbeth & Ted Sanders. 2002. The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing 15(7-8). 739-758. Del Álamo, F. Javier, Raquel Martinez & José Alberto Jaén. 2010. The intelligent web. Proceedings of the 2th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 662-666). Valencia, Spain. Del Álamo, F. Javier, Raquel Martínez & José Alberto Jaén. 2009. Rhetorical-semantic relations: A proposal for atomic representation of knowledge. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet Technologies and Applications (pp. 409-417). Wrexham, UK. Delin, Judy & John Bateman. 2002. Describing and critiquing multimodal documents. Document Design 3(2). 140-155. Delin, Judy, Anthony Hartley, Cécile Paris, Donia Scott & Keith Vander Linden. 1994. Expressing procedural relationships in multilingual instructions. Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 7) (pp. 61-70). Kennebunkport, Maine.

Page 13 of 58

Delin, Judy, Anthony Hartley & Donia Scott. 1996. Towards a contrastive pragmatics: Syntactic choice in English and French instructions. Language Sciences 18(3-4). 897-931. Delin, Judy, Donia Scott & Anthony Hartley. 1996. Language-specific mappings from semantics to syntax. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96) (Vol. 1, pp. 292-297). Copenhagen, Denmark. den Ouden, Hanny. 2004. Prosodic Realizations of Text Structure. Tilburg, The Netherlands: University of TilburgThesis Type. den Ouden, Hanny, Leo Noordman & Jacques Terken. 2002. The prosodic realization of organisational features of text. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002. Aix-en-Provence, France. den Ouden, Hanny, Carel van Wijk, Jacques Terken & Leo Noordman. 1998. Reliability of Discourse Structure Annotation (No. 33, Annual Progress Report). Eindhoven: IPO Center for Research on User- System Interaction, Technical University of Eindhoven. Di Eugenio, Barbara, Johanna D Moore & Massimo Paolucci. 1997. Learning features that predict cue usage. Proceedings of 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'97) (pp. 80-87). Madrid, Spain. Dobes, Z. & H. J. Novak. 1991. From Knowledge Structures to Text Structures. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 546. 670-684. Dos Santos, Jackline Altoé. 2012. As relações retóricas no gênero resposta argumentativa: Um estudo da superestrutura do gênero e da expressão linguística das relações. Maringá-PR: Univerdade Estadual de MaringáThesis Type. Druon, Sébastien. 2000. Projet du Taxonomie des Connecteurs du Français pour le Traitement Automatique: L'exemple des Consécutifs. Bordeaux, France: Université Michel de MontaigneThesis Type. Druon, Sébastien. 2001. Approche Exploratoire de le Relation de Consequence: Description et Implementation. Toulouse, France: Université Toulouse le MirailThesis Type. Duque, Eladio. 2013. Signaling causal coherence relations. Discourse Studies. in press. Egg, Markus & Gisela Redeker. 2008. Underspecified discourse representation. In Anton Benz & Peter Kühnlein (eds.), Constraints in Discourse (pp. 117-138). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Egg, Markus & Gisela Redeker. 2010. How complex is discourse structure? Proceedings of the 7th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). Malta. Eklund, Peter & Rudolf Wille. 1998. A multimodal approach to term extraction using a Rhetorical Structure Theory tagger and formal concept analysis. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Co-operative Multimodal Communication: Theory and Applications (pp. 171-175). Tilburg, Netherlands. Eldefrawi, Mai, Ahmed Sharaf eldin Ahmed & Adel Elsayed. 2013. Bootstrapping domain knowledge exploration using conceptual mapping of Wikipedia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 4(8). 85-95.

Page 14 of 58

El-Fishawy, Nawal, Alaa Hamouda, Gamal M. Attiya & Mohammed Atef. 2013. Arabic summarization in Twitter social network. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. in press. Elhadad, Michael. 1995. Using argumentation in text generation. Journal of Pragmatics 24. 189-220. Elouazizi, Noureddine. 2013. A note on language-centered eLearning analytics. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1866- 1871). Las Vegas, NV. Elson, D. K. 2004. Categorization of narrative semantics for use in generative multidocument summarization. In Natural Language Generation: Proceedings (Vol. 3123, pp. 192-197). Endres-Niggemeyer, B. 1994. Summarizing Text for Intelligent Communication - Results of the Dagstuhl Seminar. Knowledge Organization 21(4). 213-223. Endres-Niggemeyer, B. 2000. SimSum: an empirically founded simulation of summarizing. Information Processing and Management 36(4). 659-682. Enjalbert, Patrice, Alexandre Labadié & Stéphane Ferrari. 2013. Rhetorical browsing in journalistic texts: Preliminary investigations. Proceedings of the 2013 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS) pp (pp. 251-256). Krakow, Poland. Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline & Ted Sanders. 2011. Discovering domains: On the acquisiton of causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1645-1662. Falakmasir, Mohammad H., Kevin D. Ashley, Christian D. Schunn & Diane Litman. 2014. Identifying thesis and conclusion statements in student essays to scaffold peer review. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS). Honolulu, HI. Fang, Li, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted Sanders. 2013. Subjectivity and result marking in Mandarin. Chinese Language and Discourse 4(1). 74-119. Favero, E. L. & J. Robin. 2001. Using OLAP and data mining for content planning in natural language generation. In Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (Vol. 1959, pp. 164-175). Fawcett, Robin P. & Bethan L. Davies. 1992. Monologue as a turn in dialogue: Towards an integration of Exchange Structure and Rhetorical Structure Theory. In Robert Dale, Eduard Hovy, Dietmar Rösner & Oliviero Stock (eds.), Aspects of Automated Language Generation (pp. 151-166). Berlin: Springer. Fawcett, Robin P., Anita van der Mije & Carla van Wissen. 1988. Towards a systemic flowchart model for discourse structure. In Robin P Fawcett & David J Young (eds.), New Developments in Systemic Linguistics. Volume 2: Theory and Applications (pp. 116-143). London: Pinter. Fellbaum, C., U. Hahn & B. Smith. 2006. Towards new information resources for public health - From WordNet to MedicalWordNet. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 39(3). 321-332. Feng, Vanessa Wei & Graeme Hirst. 2012. Text-level discourse parsing with rich linguistic features. Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Jeju, Korea. Feng, Vanessa Wei & Graeme Hirst. 2013. Detecting deceptive opinions with profile compatibility. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 338-346). Nagoya, Japan.

Page 15 of 58

Ferraresi, Gisella. 2009. Transformation in coherence strategies of the Germans on the example of adverb connectors. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 75(2). 133-157. Fischer, Marcus, Elisabeth Maier & Adelheit Stein. 1994. Generating cooperative system responses in information retrieval dialogues. Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 7) (pp. 207-216). Kennebunkport, Maine. Foster, Robert. 2009. Improving the output from software that generates multiple choice question (MCQ) test items automatically using Controlled Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing. Borovets, Bulgaria. Foster, Robert. 2013. Evaluating a new MCQ generation methodology (CAREGen) in the UK electricity distribution industry. International Journal for Infonomics 6(3/4). 763-770. Fox, Barbara A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31(7). 931-952. Fuchs, Juliana Thiesen. 2008. Summ-it: Relatório de Anotação RST (Technical Report NILC-TR-08-02). São Carlos: Série de Relatórios Técnicos do NILC. Fuchs, Juliana Thiesen & Maria Eduarda Giering. 2008. A importância da consideração de aspectos funcionais do texto para a eficiência de análises RST. Revista Intercâmbio XVII. in press. Fukumoto, Jun'ichi & Jun'ichi Tsujii. 1994. Breaking down rhetorical relations for the purpose of analysing discourse structures. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 1177-1183). Kyoto, Japan. Fuller, Daniel P. 1959. The Inductive Method of Bible Study. Pasadena: Fuller Theological Seminary. Furtado, A. L. & A. E. M. Ciarlini. 2001. Generating narratives from plots using schema information. In Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (Vol. 1959, pp. 17-29). Furugori, T., R. Lin, T. Ito & D. Han. 2003. Information extraction and summarization for newspaper articles on sassho-jiken. Ieice Transactions on Information and Systems E86D(9). 1728-1735. Galani Maziero, Erick, María Lucía Castro Jorge & Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo. 2014. Revising Cross-document Structure Theory for multi-document discourse parsing. Information Processing & Management 50(2). 297-314. Galitsky, Boris, Dmitry Ilvovsky, Sergey Kuznetsov & Fedor Strok. 2013. Matching sets of parse trees for answering multi-sentence questions. Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (pp. 285-293). Hissar, Bulgaria. Gallardo, S. 2005. Pragmatic support of medical recommendations in popularized texts. Journal of Pragmatics 37(6). 813-835. Garcea, A. & C. Bazzanella. 1999. Textual links and the functions of discourse particles in Aulus Gellius's 'Noctes atticae'. Lingua E Stile 34(3). 403-430. Garrido Medina, Joaquín. 2005. La persuasión en las cartas al director: Estructura de discurso, proceso de resumen y evaluación de estructuras retóricas. Llengua Societat i Comunicació 3. 31-46.

Page 16 of 58

Garrido Medina, Joaquín. 2010. Thème et dislocation dans la langue parlée: De la syntaxe de la phrase à la construction du discours (Topic and afterthought in spoken French: From sentence syntax to discourse construction). Circulo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 42. 3-21. Gawryjolek, Jakub J. 2009. Automated annotation and visualization of rhetorical figures. Waterloo: University of WaterlooThesis Type. Georg, Gersende, Hugo Hernault, Marc Cavazza, Helmut Prendinger & Mitsuru Ishizuka. 2009. Analysing clinical guidelines' content with deontic and rhetorical structures. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (pp. 86-90). Verona, Italy. Georg, Gersende, Hugo Hernault, Marc Cavazza, Helmut Prendinger & Mitsuru Ishizuka. 2009. From rhetorical structures to document structure: Shallow pragmatic analysis for document engineering. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (pp. 185-192). Munich, Germany. Ghasemi, Mohsen & Ahmad Sharifzadeh. 2013. The analysis of the discourse layers: The case of the rotten fence. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World 4(1). 37-50. Ghorbel, Hatem, Azfal Ballim & Giovanni Coray. 2001. ROSETTA: Rhetorical and Semantic Environment for Text Alignment. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001 (pp. 224-233). Lancaster, UK. Giering, Maria Eduarda. 2007. O texto como sistema aberto e a configuração prototípica de artigos de opinião autorais. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 7(1). 27-44. Giering, Maria Eduarda. 2007. Organização retórica do artigo de opinião autoral: configuração prototípica. Circulo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 29. 3-21. Gil, Y. & V. Ratnakar. 2002. TRELLIS: An interactive tool for capturing information analysis and decision making. In Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Proceedings (pp. 37-42). Glanzberg, M. 2002. Context and discourse. Mind & Language 17(4). 333-375. Gómez-González, María de los Ángeles & Maite Taboada. 2005. Coherence relations in Functional Discourse Grammar. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie & María de los Ángeles Gómez-González (eds.), Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar (pp. 227-259). Berne: Peter Lang. González, Montserrat. 2005. Pragmatic markers and discourse coherence relations in English and Catalan oral narrative. Discourse Studies 7(1). 53-86. González Melón, Eva. 2006. Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. ITL, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 151. 119-122. Gordon, Andrew S., Luwen Huangfu, Kenji Sagae, Wenji Mao & Wen Chen. 2013. Identifying personal narratives in Chinese weblog posts. Proceedings of the 2013 Intelligent Narrative Technologies Workshop (INT6). Boston, MA. Goutsos, Dionysis. 1996. A model of sequential relations in expository text. Text 16(4). 501-533. Grabski, M. & M. Stede. 2006. Bei: Intraclausal coherence relations illustrated with a German preposition. Discourse Processes 41(2). 195-219. Granville, Robert Alan. 1990. The role of underlying structure in text generation. Proceedings of International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 105-111). Dawson, Pennsylvania.

Page 17 of 58

Granville, Robert Alan. 1993. An algorithm for high-level organization of multi-paragraph texts. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 19-22). Columbus, Ohio. Grasso, Floriana. 1999. Playing with RST: Two algorithms for the automated manipulation of discourse trees. Proceedings of Text, Speech and Dialoge 2nd International Workshop (pp. 357-360). Plzen, Czech Republic. Grasso, Floriana. 2002. Towards a framework for rhetorical argumentation. Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (EDILOG-2002) (pp. 53-60). Edinburgh, UK. Grasso, Floriana. 2002. Towards computational rhetoric. Informal Logic 22(3). 195-229. Grasso, Floriana. 2003. Rhetorical coding of health promotion dialogues. In Michel Dojat, Elpida Keravnou & Pedro Barahona (eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe, AIME 2003 (pp. 179-188). Berlin: Springer. Grasso, Floriana, A. Cawsey & R. Jones. 2000. Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53(6). 1077-1115. Green, Nancy. 2010. Representation of argumentation in text with Rhetorical Structure Theory. Argumentation. to appear. Green, Nancy & Sandra Carberry. 1992. Conversational implicatures in indirect replies. Proceedings of 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'92) (pp. 64-71). Newark, Delaware. Green, Nancy & Sandra Carberry. 1994. A hybrid reasoning model for indirect answers. Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 58-65). Las Cruces, New Mexico. Green, Nancy & Sandra Carberry. 1999. Interpreting and generating indirect answers. Computational Linguistics 25(3). 389-435. Green, Nancy, Giuseppe Carenini, S. Kerpedjiev, J. Mattis, Johanna D Moore & S. F. Roth. 2004. AutoBrief: An experimental system for the automatic generation of briefings in integrated text and information graphics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61(1). 32-70. Gries, Stefan Th. & Andrea L. Berez. 2013. Linguistic annotation in/for corpus linguistics. In Nancy Ide & James Pustejovsky (eds.), Handbook of Linguistic Annotation (pp. to appear). Berlin: Springer. Grijo, Carme Starling Bergamini. 2011. O domínio dos gêneros textuais a través do proceso de retextualização. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisThesis Type. Grimes, Joseph E. 1975. The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton. Grivaz, Cécile. 2012. Automatic extraction of causal knowledge from natural language texts. Geneva: University of GenevaThesis Type. Grommes, Patrick. 2005. Prinzipien kohärenter Kommunikation. Berlin: Humboldt Universität zu BerlinThesis Type.

Page 18 of 58

Grosz, Barbara J. & Candace L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3). 175-204. Grote, Brigitte, Eli Hagen, Adelheit Stein & Elke Teich. 1997. Speech production in human-machine dialogue: A Natural Language Generation perspective. In Elisabeth Maier, Marion Mast & Susan Luperfoy (eds.), Dialogue Processing in Spoken Language Systems (pp. 70-85). Berlin: Springer. Grote, Brigitte, Nils Lenke & Manfred Stede. 1997. Ma(r)king concessions in English and German. Discourse Processes 24. 87-117. Grote, Brigitte & Manfred Stede. 1998. Discourse marker choice in sentence planning. Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 9) (pp. 128-137). Niagra-on- the-Lake, Canada. Groza, Tudor. 2013. Using typed dependencies to study and recognise conceptualisation zones in biomedical literature. PLoS ONE. Groza, Tudor, Siegfried Handschuh, Knud Moeller & Stefan Decker. 2007. SALT - Semantically Annotated LaTeX for scientific publications. Proceedings of the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007) (pp. 518-532). Innsbruck, Austria. Groza, Tudor, Hak Lae Kim & Siegfried Handschuh. 2006. SALT: Enriching LATEX with semantic annotations. Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006). Athens, Ga. Groza, Tudor, Knud Möller, Siegfried Handschuh, Diana Trif & Stefan Decker. 2007. SALT: Weaving the claim web. Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2007) (pp. 197- 210). Busan, Korea. Groza, Tudor, Alexander Schutz & Siegfried Handschuh. 2007. SALT: A semantic approach for generating document representation. Proceedings of 7th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (pp. 171-173). Winnipeg, MA. Gruber, Helmut. 2004. Welchen Beitrag kann die (Text-) Linguistik zur Qualitätsbeurteilung studentischen Schreibens liefern? In Susanne Göpferich & Jan Engberg (eds.), Die Qualität fachsprachlicher Kommunikation (pp. 103-139). Tübingen: Narr Verlang. Gruber, Helmut. 2006. Die Kohärenzstruktur der Seminararbeiten. In Helmut Gruber, Markus Rheindorf, Karin Wetschanow, Martin Reisigl, Peter Muntigl & Christine Czinglar (eds.), Genre, Habitus und wissenschaftliches Schreiben (pp. 91-117). Münster: LIT Verlag. Gruber, Helmut. 2006. Rhetorical Structure Theory and quality assessment of students' texts. Information Design Journal 14(2). 114-129. Gruber, Helmut. 2007. Rhetorical Structure Theory and text analysis. In Helmut Gruber, Martin Kaltenbacher & Peter Muntigl (eds.), Empirieorientierte Ansätze der Diskursanalyse im Vergleich/ Empirical Approaches to Discourse Analysis (pp. 51-89). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Gruber, Helmut & Birgit Huemer. 2008. Two views on text structure: Using Rhetorical Structure Theory and Register & Genre Theory in improving students' academic writing. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication 29. 332-365.

Page 19 of 58

Gruber, Helmut & Peter Muntigl. 2005. Generic and rhetorical structures of texts: Two sides of the same coin? Folia Linguistica 39(1-2). 75-113. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1988. On the generation and interpretation of demonstrative expressions. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'88) (Vol. 1, pp. 216-221). Budapest, Hungary. Gurr, C. A. 1997. Knowledge engineering in the communication of information for safety critical systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 12(3). 249-270. Gylling, Morten. 2013. The Structure of Discourse: A Corpus-Based Cross-Linguistic Study. Copenhaguen: Copenhagen Business SchoolThesis Type. Hachey, Ben & Claire Grover. 2004. A rhetorical status classifier for legal text summarisation. Proceedings of Text Summarization Branches Out Workshop, 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Barcelona, Spain. Haddow, Barry. 2005. Acquiring a Disambiguation Model for Discourse Connectives. Edinburgh: University of EdinburghThesis Type. Hagen, Eli. 1999. An approach to mixed initiative spoken information retrieval dialogue. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 9(1-2). 167-213. Hagen, Eli, Adelheit Stein & John Bateman. 1994. The Extension of a Rhetorical Component for the `Speak!' Dialogue System (COPERNICUS Project 10393; Deliverable R3.2.2). Darmstadt, Germany: GMD/Institut für Integrierte Publikations- und Informationssysteme. Hahn, Udo. 2002. The theory and practice of discourse parsing and summarization. Computational Linguistics 28(1). 81-83. Haller, S. 1999. An introduction to interactive discourse processing from the perspective of plan recognition and text planning. Artificial Intelligence Review 13(4). 259-311. Handa, Carolyn. 2013. The Multimediated Rhetoric of the Internet: Digital Fusion. New York: Routledge. Hannay, Mike & Caroline Kroon. 2005. Acts and the relationship between discourse and grammar. Functions of Language 12(1). 87–124. Hanneforth, Thomas, Silvan Heintze & Manfred Stede. 2003. Rhetorical parsing with underspecification and forests. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003. Edmonton, Canada. Haouam, Kamel & Fahri Marir. 2003. SEMIR: Semantic indexing and retrieving web document using Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (IDEAL 2003) (Vol. 2690, pp. 596-604). Hong Kong. Haouam, Kamel & Fahri Marir. 2006. A dynamic weight assignment approach for index terms. Journal of Computer Science 2(3). 261-268. Haouam, Kamel, A. Touir & Fahri Marir. 2003. Towards a framework design of a retrieval document system based on Rhetorical Structure Theory and cue phrases. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Trends in Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining (IIS2003). Poland.

Page 20 of 58

Harabagiu, Sanda. 1999. From lexical cohesion to textual coherence: A data driven perspective. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 13(2). 247-265. Harabagiu, Sanda & Steven Maiorano. 1999. Knowledge-lean coreference resolution and its relation to textual cohesion and coherence. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on The Relation of Discourse/Dialogue Structure and Reference (pp. 29-38). College Park, Maryland. Hardt, Daniel. 2013. A uniform syntax and discourse structure: The Copenhaguen Dependency Treebanks. Dialogue and Discourse 4(2). 53-64. Hartley, Anthony & Cécile Paris. 1997. Multilingual Document Production From Support for Translating to Support for Authoring. Machine Translation 12(1-2). 109-129. Harvey, Terrency & Sandra Carberry. 1998. Integrating text plans for conciseness and coherence. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 512-518). Montréal, Canada. Hasannejad, Mohammad Reza, Nader Assadi & Mehdi Mirzaei. 2013. The role of instructing substitution as a kind of grammatical cohesion on its tru identification and creation of modal, reporting and conditional texts. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 4(10). 3366-3376. Hearst, Marti. 1994. Multi-paragraph segmentation of expository text. Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'94) (pp. 9-16). Las Cruces, New Mexico. Henderson, Peter & Nishadi De Silva. 2006. A narrative approach to collaborative writing: A business process model. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS). Paphos, Cyprus. Henschel, Renate. 2003. GeM Annotation Manual (Technical Report 2003/04). Bremen: University of Bremen. Henschel, Renate. 2003. GeM Annotation: One complete example - the Flegg page (GeM Project Report 2003/03). Bremen: University of Bremen. Hernault, Hugo, Danushka Bollegala & Mitsuru Ishizuka. 2010. A sequential model for discourse segmentation. Proceedings of 11th International Conference, CICLing 2010 (pp. 315-326). Iasi, Romania. Hernault, Hugo, Danushka Bollegala & Mitsuru Ishizuka. 2011. Semi-supervised discourse relation classification with structural learning. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (CICLing '11). Tokyo, Japan. Hiippala, Tuomo. 2012. The localisation of advertising print media as a multimodal process. In Wendy L. Bowcher (ed.), Multimodal Texts from around the World: Linguistic and Cultural Insights (pp. 97- 122). London: Palgrave. Hiippala, Tuomo. 2012. Reading paths and visual perception in multimodal research, psychology and brain sciences. Journal of Pragmatics 44(3). 315-327.

Page 21 of 58

Hiippala, Tuomo. 2014. Multimodality, monographs and higher education in the humanities. In A. Archer & E. Breuer (eds.), Multimodality in Higher Education (pp. submitted). Leiden: Brill. Hiippala, Tuomo. to appear. The interface between rhetoric and layout in multimodal artefacts. Literary and Linguistic Computing. Hilbert, Mirco, Henning Lobin, Maja Bärenfänger, Harald Lüngen & Csilla Puskás. 2006. A text- technological approach to automatic discourse analysis of complex texts. Proceedings of KONVENS 2006. Hirao, Tsutomu, Yasuhisa Yoshida, Masaaki Nishino, Norihito Yasuda & Masaaki Nagata. 2013. Single- document summarization as a tree knapsack problem. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1515-1520). Seattle, WA. Hirst, Graeme. 2002. Patterns of text: In honour of Michael Hoey. Computational Linguistics 28(4). 560- 564. Hobbs, Jerry. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 6. 67-90. Hobbs, Jerry. 1985. On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse (Research Report 85-37). Stanford, CA: CSLI. Hobbs, Jerry. 2013. Influences and inferences. Computational Linguistics in press. Hogenboom , Alexander, Malissa Bal, Flavius Frasincar, Daniella Bal, Uzay Kaymak & Franciska De Jong. 2014. Lexicon-based sentiment analysis by mapping conveyed sentiment to intended sentiment. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology. Hogenboom , Alexander, Bas Heerschop, Flavius Frasincar, Uzay Kaymak & Franciska De Jong. 2014. Multi-lingual support for lexicon-based sentiment analysis guided by semantics. Decision Support Systems. in press. Holler, A. 2007. Uniform or different? - On the syntactic status of non-restrictive relative clauses. Deutsche Sprache 35(3). 250-270. Hovy, Eduard. 1988. Planning coherent multisentential text. Proceedings of 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'88) (pp. 163-169). Buffalo, New York. Hovy, Eduard. 1990. Parsimonious and profligate approaches to the question of discourse structure relations. Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Text Generation (pp. 59-65). Pittsburgh, PA. Hovy, Eduard. 1990. Unresolved issues in paragraph planning. In Robert Dale, Chris Mellish & Michael Zock (eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation (pp. 17-45). London: Academic Press. Hovy, Eduard. 1991. Recent trends in computational research on monologic discourse structure. Computational Intelligence 7. 363-366. Hovy, Eduard. 1992. A New Level of Language Generation Technology - Capabilities and Possibilities. IEEE Expert-Intelligent Systems & Their Applications 7(2). 12-17. Hovy, Eduard. 1993. Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations. Artificial Intelligence 63(1-2). 341-385.

Page 22 of 58

Hovy, Eduard. 1993. From interclausal relations to discourse structure- A long way behind, a long way ahead. In Helmut Horacek & Michael Zock (eds.), New Concepts in Natural Language Generation (pp. 57-68). London: Pinter. Hovy, Eduard. 1995. The multifunctionality of discourse markers. Proceedings of Workshop on Discourse Markers. Egmond-aan-Zee. Hovy, Eduard & Yigal Arens. 1991. Automatic generation of formatted text. Proceedings of 9th AAAI Conference. Anaheim, California. Hovy, Eduard, Julia Lavid, Elisabeth Maier, Vibhu Mittal & Cécile Paris. 1992. Employing knowledge resources in a new text planning architecture. In Robert Dale, Eduard Hovy, Dietmar Rösner & Oliviero Stock (eds.), Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation (pp. 57-72). Berlin: Springer. Hovy, Eduard & Chin Yew Lin. 1997. Automated text summarization in Summarist. Proceedings of ACL/EACL Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization (pp. 18-24). Madrid. Hovy, Eduard & Elisabeth Maier. 1992. Parsimonious or Profligate: How Many and Which Discourse Structure Relations? (Technical Report ISI/RR-93-373.): Information Sciences Institute. Hovy, Eduard & Elisabeth Maier. 1995. Parsimonious or Profligate: How Many and Which Discourse Structure Relations? Unpublished manuscript. Huang, Xiaoli. 2013. Applying a generic function-based topical relevance typology to structure clinical questions and answers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(1). 65-85. Huang, Xiaoli & Dagobert Soergel. 2013. Functional relevance and inductive development of an e- retailing product information typology. Information Research 18(2). Huffman, S. B. & J. E. Laird. 1995. Flexibly instructable agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 3. 271-324. Hulstijn, J., F. Dignum & M. Dastani. 2005. Coherence constraints for agent interaction. In Agent Communication (Vol. 3396, pp. 134-152). Hunter, A. 2001. Hybrid argumentation systems for structured news reports. Knowledge Engineering Review 16(4). 295-329. Huong, Le Thanh. 2004. Automatic Discourse Structure Generation Using Rhetorical Structure Theory. London: Middlesex UniversityThesis Type. Huong, Le Thanh. 2007. An approach in automatically generating discourse structure of text. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics 23(3). 212-230. Huong, Le Thanh & Geetha Abeysinghe. 2003. A study to improve the efficiency of a discourse parsing system. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (Vol. 2588, pp. 101-114). Berlin. Huong, Le Thanh, Geetha Abeysinghe & Christian Huyck. 2003. Using cohesive devices to recognize rhetorical relations in text. Proceedings of 4th Computational Linguistics UK Research Colloquium (CLUK 4). University of Edinburgh, UK.

Page 23 of 58

Hwang, S. J. J. 2005. Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson. Word-Journal of the International Linguistic Association 56(2). 270-277. Ibrahim, Ahmed & Tarek Elghazaly. 2012. Arabic text summarization using Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Informatics and Systems (pp. 34-38). Cairo, Egypt. Ibrahim, Ahmed & Tarek Elghazaly. 2013. Improve the automatic summarization of Arabic text depending on Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of 12th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 223-227). México. Ibrahim, Ahmed, Tarek Elghazaly & Mervat Gheith. 2013. A novel Arabic text summarization model based on Rhetorical Structure Theory and Vector Space Model. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing 2(8). 480-484. Ide, Nancy & Dan Cristea. 2000. A hierarchical account of referential accessibility. Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 416 - 424). Hong Kong. Inder, Robert & Jon Oberlander. 1995. Using discourse to aid Hypertext navigation. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) (pp. 195-200). Tokyo, Japan. Iruskieta, Mikel, María Jesús Aranzabe, Arantxa Díaz de Ilarraza Sánchez, Itziar González -Dios, Mikel Lersundi & Oier López de Lacalle. 2013. The RST Basque TreeBank: An online search interface to check rhetorical relations. Proceedings of the IV Workshop on RST and Text Studies (pp. 40-49). Fortaleza, Brazil. Iruskieta, Mikel & Iria Da Cunha. 2010. El potencial de las relaciones retóricas para la discriminación de textos especializados de diferentes dominios en euskera y español (Potential of rhetorical relations for differentiation among specialized texts from different domains in Basque and Spanish)¡. Calidoscópio 8(3). 181-202. Iruskieta, Mikel, Arantza Díaz De Ilarraza & Mikel Lersundi. 2011. Unidad discursiva y relaciones retóricas: Un estudio acerca de las unidades de discurso en el etiquetado de un corpus en Euskera (Discourse unit and rhetorical relations. A study about discourse units in the annotation of a corpus in Basque). Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 47. 137-144. Iruskieta, Mikel, Arantza Díaz De Ilarraza & Mikel Lersundi. 2013. Establishing criteria for RST-based discourse segmentation and annotation for texts in Basque. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. in press. Iruskieta, Mikel, Arantxa Díaz de Ilarraza Sánchez & Mikel Lersundi. 2009. Correlaciones en euskera entre las relaciones retóricas y los marcadores del discurso. Paper presented at the Conferencia de la Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada, Ciudad Real (Spain). Ismail, Sally S., Ibrahim F. Moawad & Mostafa Aref. 2013. Arabic text representation using rich semantic graph: A case study. Recent Advances in Information Science. 148-153. Jahangard, Ali, Amin Rajabi-Kondlaji & Karim Khalaji. 2014. A comparison of moves in conclusion sections of research articles in mechanical engineering and applied linguistics. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World 5(2). 346-359.

Page 24 of 58

Jardine, James G. 2014. Automatically generating reading lists. Cambridge: University of CambridgeThesis Type. Jayez, Jacques & Corinne Rossari. 1998. Discourse relations versus discourse marker relations. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 72-78). Montréal, Canada. Ji, P. 2006. Multi-document summarization based on unsupervised clustering. In Information Retrieval Technology, Proceedings (Vol. 4182, pp. 560-566). Johnsen, L. 2001. Document (re)presentation: Object-orientation, visual language, and XML. Technical Communication 48(1). 59-65. Jordan, Michael P. 1992. An integrated three-pronged analysis of a fund-raising letter. In William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund- Raising Text (pp. 171-226). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Jorge, María Lucía Castro & Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo. 2009. Content selection operators for multidocument summarization based on Cross-document Structure Theory. Proceedings of the 7th Brazilian Symposium in Information and Human Language Technology - STIL. São Carlos, Brazil. Joty, Shafiq. 2013. Discourse Analysis of Asynchronous Conversations. Vancouver: University of British ColumbiaThesis Type. Kamalski, Judith. 2007. Coherence Marking, Comprehension and Persuasion: On the Processing and Representation of Discourse. Utrecht: LOT. Kamyab, Ghodratollah. 1997. Rhetorical Analysis of Specialist and Popularized Medical Review Articles. Melbourne: Monash UniversityThesis Type. Kang, Juyeon & Patrick Saint-Dizier. 2013. Discourse structure analysis for requirement mining. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development and Technology 3(2). 43-65. Kaplan, R. B. & W. Grabe. 2002. A modem history of written discourse analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing 11(3). 191-223. Karamanis, Nikiforos. 2007. Supplementing entity coherence with local rhetorical relations for information ordering. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16. 445-464. Karamanis, Nikiforos, Chris Mellish, Massimo Poesio & Jon Oberlander. 2009. Evaluating Centering for information ordering using corpora. Computational Linguistics 35(1). 29-46. Károly, Krisztina. 1998. Written text analysis: A multidisciplinary field of study. Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik 8(1). 71-108. Károly, Krisztina. 2012. Discourse analysis and language teaching: The benefits of the theories and methods of discourse analysis in the language classroom. In Ilona Feld-Knapp (ed.), Beruf und Berufung: Fremdsprachenlehrer in Ungarn (pp. 75-105). Budapest: Typotex Kiadó. Károly, Krisztina. 2013. Translating rhetoric: Relational propositional shifts in Hungarian-English translations of news stories. The Translator 19(2). 245-273.

Page 25 of 58

Katz, Sandra & Patricia L. Albacete. 2013. A tutoring system that simulates the highly interactive nature of human tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology. in press. Katz, S. & D. Allbritton. 2002. Going beyond the problem given: How human tutors use post-practice discussions to support transfer. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. 2363, pp. 641-650). Katzav, J. & C. Reed. 2008. Modelling argument recognition and reconstruction. Journal of Pragmatics 40(1). 155-172. Ke, Li Yuan & Michael Hoey. 2013. Strategies of writing summaries for hard news texts: A text analysis approach. Discourse Studies. in press. Kehler, Andrew. 1995. Interpreting Cohesive Forms in the Context of Discourse Inference. Cambridge, Massachusetts: HarvardThesis Type. Kehler, Andrew. 2002. Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI. Khoo, C. S. G. & J. C. Na. 2006. Semantic relations in information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 40. 157-228. Khoo, C. S. G., S. Y. Ou & D. H. L. Goh. 2002. A hierarchical framework for multi-document summarization of dissertation abstracts. In Digital Libraries: People, Knowledge, and Technology, Proceedings (Vol. 2555, pp. 99-110). Khurana, Swati. 2013. A text analytics-based approach to compute coverage, readability and comprehensibility of eBooks. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Contemporary Computing (pp. 256-261). Noida, India. Khurshid, S. K. & M. Shoaib. 2013. RIO: Rhetorical structure theory based indexing technique for image objects. International Arab Journal of Information Technology 10(5). Kibble, Rodger. 2006. Dialectical text planning. Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument. Riva del Garda, Italy. Kibble, Rodger. 2007. Generating coherence relations via internal argumentation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16(4). 387-402. Kibble, Rodger & Richard Power. 1999. Using Centering Theory to plan coherent texts. Proceedings of the 12th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 187-192). Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Kibble, Rodger & Richard Power. 2004. Optimizing referential coherence in text generation. Computational Linguistics 30(4). 401-416. Kibrik, Andrej A. 2013. Discourse semantics and the form of the verb predicate in Karachay-Balkar. In Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language Typology and Historical Contingency: Essays in Honor of Johanna Nichols (pp. 3-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Kim, Sanghee, Rob H. Bracewell & Ken M. Wallace. 2007. Answering engineers' questions using semantic annotations. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing 21(2). 155-171.

Page 26 of 58

Kittredge, R. 2002. Paraphrasing for condensation in journal abstracting. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 35(4). 265-277. Kittredge, Richard, Tanya Korelsky & Owen Rambow. 1991. On the need for domain communication language. Computational Intelligence 7. 305-314. Kleiber, Georges & Hélène Vassiliadou. 2009. Regarding the relation of elaboration: from intuitive approaches to formal approaches. Journal of French Language Studies 19(2). 183-205. Kleiber, Georges & Hélène Vassiliadou. 2009. Sur la relation d'Élaboration: des approches intuitives aux approches formelles. Journal of French Language Studies 19(2). 183-205. Kneser, C. & R. Ploetzner. 2001. Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: observed dialogue structures and their relation to learning success. Learning and Instruction 11(1). 53-83. Knott, Alistair. 1996. A Data-Driven Methodology for Motivating a Set of Coherence Relations. Edinburgh, UK: University of EdinburghThesis Type. Knott, Alistair. 1998. Similarity and contrast relations and inductive rules. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 54-57). Montréal, Canada. Knott, Alistair. 2001. Semantic and pragmatic relations and their intended effects. In Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord & Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects (pp. 127-151). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Knott, A. 2007. Coherence in natural language: Data stuctures and applications. Computational Linguistics 33(4). 591-595. Knott, Alistair & Robert Dale. 1994. Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 18(1). 35-62. Knott, Alistair & Robert Dale. 1996. Choosing a set of coherence relations for text generation: A data- driven approach. In Giovanni Adorni & Michael Zock (eds.), Trends in Natural Language Generation: an Artificial Intelligence Perspective (pp. 47-67). Berlin: Springer. Knott, Alistair & Chris Mellish. 1996. A feature-based account of the relations signalled by sentence and clause connectives. Language and Speech 39(2-3). 143-183. Knott, Alistair, Jon Oberlander, Michael O'Donnell & Chris Mellish. 2001. Beyond elaboration: The interaction of relations and focus in coherent text. In Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord & Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects (pp. 181-196). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Knott, Alistair & Ted Sanders. 1998. The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics 30. 135-175. Knott, A., T. Sanders & J. Oberlander. 2001. Levels of representation in discourse relations. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3). 197-209. Koh, HyunSeung. 2011. Annotations and Rhetorical Structure Theory: implications for the design of eBooks. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 1549-1557). Chesapeake, VA.

Page 27 of 58

Komppa, Johanna. 2012. Retorisen rakenteen teoria suomi toisena kielenä -ylioppilaskokeen kirjoitelman kokonaisrakenteen ja kappalejaon tarkastelussa [Rhetorical structure theory in study of the schematic, rhetorical and paragraph structure of matriculation essays in Finnish as a second language]. Helsinki, Finland: University of HelsinkiThesis Type. Kong, Kenneth C. C. 1998. Are simple business request letters really simple? A comparison of Chinese and English business request letters. Text 18(1). 103-141. Kong, Kenneth C C. 2006. A taxonomy of the discourse relations between words and visual. Information Design Journal 14(3). 207-230. Konstas, Ioannis & Mirella Lapata. 2013. Inducing document plans for concept-to-text generation. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1503-1514). Seattle, WA. Korelsky, Tanya & Richard Kittredge. 1993. Towards stratification of RST. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 52-55). Ohio State University. Korzen, Iorn & Morten Gylling. 2012. Text structure in a contrastive and translational perspective. Translation: Computation, Corpora, Cognition 2(1). 23-46. Kosseim, Leila & Guy Lapalme. 1994. Content and rhetorical status selection in instructional texts. Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 53-60). Kennebunkport, Maine. Kosseim, Leila & Guy Lapalme. 2000. Choosing rhetorical structures to plan instructional texts. Computational Intelligence 16(3). 408-445. Krasavina, Olga. 2004. Use of the third-person pronouns and rhetorical structure: A corpus-oriented study. Proceedings of 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2004). Lisbon, Portugal. Krifka-Dobes, Zuzana & Hans-Joachim Novak. 1993. From constituent planning to text planning. In Helmut Horacek & Michael Zock (eds.), New Concepts in Natural Language Generation: Planning, Realization, and Systems (pp. 87-113). London: Pinter. Krishna, R.V.V. Murali, S.Y. Pavan Kumar & Ch. Satyananda Reddy. 2013. A hybrid method for query based automatic summarization system. International Journal of Computer Applications 68(6). 39- 43. Kumar, Yogan Jaya, Naomie Salim, A. Hamza & A. Abuobieda. 2012. Automatic identification of cross- document structural relationships (pp. 26-29). Kumar, Yogan Jaya, Naomie Salim & Basit Raza. 2012. Cross-document structural relationship identification using supervised machine learning. Applied Soft Computing. in press. Kurohashi, Sadao & Makoto Nagao. 1994. Automatic detection of discourse structure by checking surface information in sentences. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'94) (Vol. 1, pp. 1123-1127). Kyoto, Japan. Kuronen, M. L., J. Tienari & E. Vaara. 2005. The merger storm recognizes no borders: An analysis of media rhetoric on a business manoeuvre. Organization 12(2). 247-273.

Page 28 of 58

Lagerwerf, Luuk, L. Cornelis, J. de Geus & P. Jansen. 2008. Advance organizers in advisory reports - Selective reading, recall, and perception. Written Communication 25(1). 53-75. Lagerwerf, Luuk, Wilbert Spooren & Liesbeth Degand. 2006. Surface cues of content and tenor in texts - Introduction. Discourse Processes 41(2). 111-116. Lascarides, Alex & Nicholas Asher. 1991. Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. Proceedings of 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'91) (pp. 55-62). Berkeley, California. Lascarides, Alex & Nicholas Asher. 1993. Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(5). 437-493. Lascarides, Alex, Nicholas Asher & Jon Oberlander. 1992. Inferring discourse relations in context. Proceedings of 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1-8). Newark, Delaware. Lavid, Julia & Maite Taboada. 2004. Stylistic differences in document design across languages in Europe: A cross-linguistic characterization. Journal of Technical Writing and Communications 34(1- 2). 43-65. Le Draoulec, A. & M. P. Pery-Woodley. 2005. Temporal management and discourse relations. Langue Francaise(148). 45-+. Le, E. 2003. Information sources as a persuasive strategy in editorials - Le Monde and the New York times. Written Communication 20(4). 478-510. Levinson, Stephen. 2013. Pragmatics as the origin of recursion. In Francis Lowenthal & Francis Lefebvre (eds.), Language and Recursion (pp. 3-13). Berlin: Springer. Lewis, Diana. 2013. The emergence of discourse connectives in discourse constructions. In Catherine Bolly & Liesbeth Degand (eds.), Across the Line of Speech and Writing Variation (pp. 33-49). Louvain- la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain. Liakata, Maria, Simon Dobnik, Shyamasree Saha, Colin Batchelor & Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann. 2013. A discourse-driven content model for summarising scientific articles evaluated in a complex question answering task. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 747-757). Seattle, WA. Lin, Ziheng, Hwee Tou Ng & Min-Yen Kan. 2014. A PDTB-styled end-to-end discourse parser. Natural Language Engineering 20(2). 151-184. Lindley, Craig, Jim Davis, Frank Nack & Lloyd Rutledge. 2001. The Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory to Interactive News Program Generation from Digital Archives (Technical Report No. INS- R0101). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica. Litman, Diane J. & Rebecca Passonneau. 1995. Combining multiple knowledge sources for discourse segmentation. Proceedings of 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'95) (pp. 108-115). Cambridge, Massachusetts. Longacre, Robert E. 1976. An Anatomy of Speech Notions. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press. Longacre, Robert E. 1983. The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum.

Page 29 of 58

Lorenz, Gunter. 1999. Learning to cohere: Causal links in native vs. non-native argumentative writing. In Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk & Eija Ventola (eds.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse: How to Create It and How to Describe It (pp. 56-75). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Louwerse, Max M. 2001. An analytic and cognitive parametrization of coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3). 291-315. Lüngen, Harald, Maja Bärenfänger, Mirco Hilbert, Henning Lobin & Csilla Puskás. 2006. Text parsing of a complex genre. Proceedings ELPUB2006 Conference on Electronic Publishing (pp. 247-256). Bankso, Bulgaria. Lyavdansky, Alexey. 2010. Temporal deictic adverbs as discourse markers in Hebrew, Aramaic and Akkadian. Journal of Language Relationship 2. 22-42. Maâloul, Mohamed Hédi. 2012. Approche hybride pour le résumé automatique de textes. Application à la langue arabe. Marseille, France: Aix-Marseille UniversitéThesis Type. Madjid, I., C. Stephane & M. Daniel. 2003. The effect of individual differences on searching the Web. In Asist 2003: Proceedings of the 66th Asist Annual Meeting, Vol 40, 2003 (Vol. 40, pp. 240-246). Mahlow, Morris. 2006. Entwicklung und Vergleich von zwei Verfahren zur Auswertung von deutschen Freitextkommentaren. Potsdam: Universität PotsdamThesis Type. Maier, Elisabeth. 1991. Zwei Texttheorien in neuem Licht - RST und GSP fuers Abstracting. Paper presented at the Workshop Textzusammenfassen at the yearly GAL conference, Mainz, Germany. Maier, Elisabeth. 1996. Textual relations as part of multiple links between text segments. In Giovanni Adorni & Michael Zock (eds.), Trends in Natural Language Generation: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective (pp. 68-87). Berlin: Springer. Maier, Elisabeth & Eduard Hovy. 1991. A metafunctionally motivated taxonomy for discourse structure relations. Proceedings of 3rd European Workshop on Language Generation. Innsbruck, Austria. Maier, Elisabeth & Eduard Hovy. 1993. Organising discourse structure relations using metafunctions. In Helmut Horacek & Michael Zock (eds.), New Concepts in Natural Language Generation (pp. 69-86). London: Pinter. Maier, Elisabeth & Stefan Sitter. 1992. An extension of rhetorical structure theory for the treatment of retrieval dialogues. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 968–973). Bloomington, IN. Mancini, Clara, Donia Scott & Simon Buckingham Shum. 2006. Visualizing discourse coherence in non- linear documents. Traitement Automatique des Langues 47(2). 137-168. Mancini, Clara & Simon J. Buckingham Shum. 2006. Modelling discourse in contested domains: A semiotic and cognitive framework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(11). 1154- 1171. Mann, William C. 1983. An Overview of the Nigel Text Generation Grammar: ISI/RR-83-113. Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California. Mann, William C. 1983. An Overview of the Penman Text Generation Grammar: ISI/RR-83-114. Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.

Page 30 of 58

Mann, William C. 1999. Introducción a la Teoría de la Estructura Retórica (Rhetorical Structure Theory: RST). Unpublished manuscript. Mann, William C. 2000. Pretty Open Questions (POQ's) about RST. Unpublished manuscript. Mann, William C. 2003. Models of intentions in language. In Peter Kühnlein, Hannes Rieser & Henk Zeevat (eds.), Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium (pp. 165-178). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Mann, William C. 2003. RST Web Site, from http://www.sil.org/~mannb/rst/ (Soon to be moved to: http://www.sfu.ca/rst) Mann, William C. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. 1991. Functions of language in two frameworks. Word 42(3). 231-249. Mann, William C., Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen & Sandra A. Thompson. 1992. Rhetorical Structure Theory and text analysis. In William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text (pp. 39-78). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Mann, William C. & Maite Taboada. 2010. RST Web Site, from http://www.sfu.ca/rst Mann, William C. & Maite Taboada. 2014. RST Web Site, from http://www.sfu.ca/rst Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1983. Relational Propositions in Discourse (Technical Report No. ISI/RR-83-115). Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute. Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1986. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Description and Construction of Text Sructures (Technical Report No. ISI/RS-86-174). Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute. Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization (No. ISI/RS-87-190). Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute. Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3). 243-281. Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1992. Relational Discourse Structure: A comparison of approaches to structuring text by 'contrast'. In Shin Ja J. Hwang & William R. Merrifield (eds.), Language in Context: Essays for Robert E. Longacre (pp. 19-45). Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington. Mantynen, Anne Kaarina. 2003. Talking about Language: The Rhetoric of Language Columns. Helsinki: University of HelsinkiThesis Type. Marcu, Daniel. 1996. Building up rhetorical structure trees. Proceedings of 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 1069-1074). Portland, Oregon. Marcu, Daniel. 1996. Distinguishing between coherent and incoherent texts. Proceedings of Student Conference on Computational Linguistics in Montréal (pp. 136-143). Montréal, Canada. Marcu, Daniel. 1997. From discourse structures to text summaries. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarisation (pp. 82-88). Madrid, Spain.

Page 31 of 58

Marcu, Daniel. 1997. From local to global coherence: A bottom-up approach to text planning. Proceedings of 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 629-635). Providence, Rhode Island. Marcu, Daniel. 1997. The rhetorical parsing of natural language texts. Proceedings of 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (ACL'97/EACL'97) (pp. 96-103). Madrid, Spain. Marcu, Daniel. 1997. The Rhetorical Parsing, Summarization, and Generation of Natural Language Texts. Toronto, Canada: University of TorontoThesis Type. Marcu, Daniel. 1998. Improving summarization through rhetorical parsing tuning. Proceedings of ACL 6th Workshop on Very Large Corpora (pp. 206-215). Montréal, Canada. Marcu, Daniel. 1998. A surface-based approach to identifying discourse markers and elementary textual units in unrestricted texts. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 1-7). Montréal, Canada. Marcu, Daniel. 1998. To build text summaries of higher quality, nuclearity is not sufficient. Proceedings of AAAI-98 Spring Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarization (pp. 1-8). Stanford, California. Marcu, Daniel. 1999. A decision-based approach to rhetorical parsing. Proceedings of 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'99) (pp. 365-372). College Park, Maryland. Marcu, Daniel. 1999. Discourse trees are good indicators of importance in texts. In Inderjeet Mani & Mark Maybury (eds.), Advances in Automatic Text Summarization (pp. 123-136): The MIT Press. Marcu, Daniel. 1999. A formal and computational synthesis of Grosz and Sidner's and Mann and Thompson's theories. Proceedings of Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse (pp. 101- 108). Edinburgh, Scotland. Marcu, Daniel. 1999. Instructions for Manually Annotating the Discourse Structures of Texts. Unpublished manuscript, Marina del Rey, California. Marcu, Daniel. 2000. Extending a formal and computational model of Rhetorical Structure Theory with intentional structures a la Grosz and Sidner. The 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'00) (Vol. 1, pp. 523-529). Saarbrücken, Germany. Marcu, Daniel. 2000. The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: A surface based approach. Computational Linguistics 26(3). 395-448. Marcu, Daniel. 2000. The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Marcu, Daniel, Lynn Carlson & Maki Watanabe. 2000. The automatic translation of discourse structures. 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL'00) (pp. 9-17). Seattle, Washington. Marcu, Daniel, Lynn Carlson & Maki Watanabe. 2000. An empirical study in multilingual Natural Language Generation: What should a text planner do? First International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG'2000) (pp. 17-23). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel.

Page 32 of 58

Marcu, Daniel & Abdessamad Echihabi. 2002. An unsupervised approach to recognising discourse relations. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02) (pp. 368-375). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Marcu, Daniel, Magdalena Romera & Estibaliz Amorrortu. 1999. Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging (pp. 48-57). College Park, Maryland. Marcu, Daniel, Magdalena Romera & Estibaliz Amorrortu. 1999. Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees: Problems, annotation choices, issues. Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse (pp. 71-78). Edinburgh, UK. Marir, Fahri & Kamel Haouam. 2002. RSTIndex: Indexing and retrieving web document using computational and linguistic techniques. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (IDEAL 2002) (Vol. 2412, pp. 135-140). UK. Marir, Fahri & Kamel Haouam. 2004. Rhetorical Structure Theory for content-based indexing and retrieval of Web documents. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Information Technology: Research and Education (ITRE 2004). UK. Martin, James R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Mas Manchón, Lluís. 2012. Análisis prosódico discursivo de las fases de la noticia en televisión (Discursive prosodic analysis of the phases of television news). Oralia 15. 205-239. Maslennikov, Mstislav & Tat-seng Chua. 2007. A multi-resolution framework for information extraction from free text. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (pp. 592-599). Prague, Czech Republic. Mathkour, Hassan I., Ameur A. Touir & Waleed A. Al-Sanea. 2008. Parsing Arabic texts using Rhetorical Structure Theory. Journal of Computer Science 4(9). 713-720. Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2005. Remembering Bill Mann. Computational Linguistics 31(2). 161-172. Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & John Bateman. 1991. Text Generation and Systemic-Functional Linguistics: Experiences from English and Japanese. London and New York: Pinter. Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. The structure of discourse and "subordination". In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Discourse and Grammar (pp. 275-329). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M., Licheng Zeng, Marilyn Cross, Ichiro Kobayashi, Kazuhiro Teruya & Canzhong Wu. 1998. The Multex generator and its environment: Application and development. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 228-237). Montréal, Canada. Mazeiro, E & Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo. 2009. Metodologia de avaliação automática de estruturas retóricas. Paper presented at the 7th Brazilian Symposium in Information and Human Language Technology (STIL 2009), São Paulo, Brazil. McIlmoil, Tara. 2001. Using RST Lite to Teach Organisational Structure and Coherence (Essay).

Page 33 of 58

McKeown, Kathleen, Jacques Robin & Karen Kukich. 1995. Generating concise natural language summaries. Information Processing and Management 31(5). 703-733. McKeown, Kathleen R. 1985. Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McNamara, Danielle S., Arthur C. Graesser, Philip M. McCarthy & Zhiqiang Cai. 2014. Automatic Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McTear, M. F. 2002. Spoken dialogue technology: Enabling the conversational user interface. Acm Computing Surveys 34(1). 90-169. Mehler, A. 2002. Components of a model of context-sensitive hypertexts. Journal of Universal Computer Science 8(10). 924-943. Mellish, Chris, Alistair Knott, Jon Oberlander & Michael O'Donnell. 1998. Experiments using stochastic search for text planning. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 98- 107). Niagara-on-the-lake, Canada. Mendoza, Martha, Susana Bonilla, Clara Noguera, Carlos Cobos & Elizabeth León. 2014. Extractive single-document summarization based on genetic operators and guided local search. Expert Systems with Applications. in press. Mentis, Helena M., Paula M. Bach, Blaine Hoffman, Mary Beth Rosson & John M. Carroll. 2009. Development of decision rationale in complex group decision making. Proceedings of 27th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1341-1350). Boston, MA. Meteer, Marie. 1993. Assumptions underlying discourse relations: Which ones are really there and where are they? Proceedings of Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, ACL (pp. 82-85). Ohio State University. Mey, J. L. 2006. Focus-on issue: The pragmatics of discourse management. Journal of Pragmatics 38(4). 473-474. Meyers, Adam. 2013. Contrasting and corroborating citations in journal articles. Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (pp. 460-466). Hissar, Bulgaria. Miike, Seiji, Etsuo Itoh, Kenji Ono & Kazuo Sumita. 1994. A full-text retrieval system with a dynamic abstract generation function. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference (pp. 152-161). Dublin, Ireland. Milosavljevic, Maria & Jon Oberlander. 1998. Dynamic Hypertext catalogues: Helping users to help themselves. Proceedings of 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 123-131). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Miltsakaki, Eleni & Karen Kukich. 2004. Evaluation of text coherence for electronic essay scoring systems. Natural Language Engineering 10(1). 25-55. Min, Daihwan. 2007. A survey on methods for analyzing team communication. Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management 14(2). 169-187.

Page 34 of 58

Mithun, Shamima & Leila Kosseim. 2011. Comparing approaches to tag discourse relations. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (CICLing '11) (pp. 328-339). Tokyo, Japan. Mithun, Shamima & Leila Kosseim. 2013. Measuring the effect of discourse relations on blog summarization. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 1401-1409). Nagoya, Japan. Mitocariu, Elena, Daniel Alexandru Anechitei & Dan Cristea. 2013. Comparing discourse tree structures. In Alexander Gelbukh (ed.), Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (pp. 513-522). Berlin: Springer. Mizuta, Y., A. Korhonen, T. Mullen & N. Collier. 2006. Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction. International Journal of Medical Informatics 75(6). 468-487. Moens, Marie-Francine. 2007. Summarizing court decisions. Information Processing and Management 43(6). 1748-1764. Moens, Marie-Francine & Rik De Busser. 2002. First steps in building a model for the retrieval of court decisions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57(5). 429-446. Mohamed, Aysha H. & Marjzoub R. Omer. 1999. Syntax as a marker of rhetorical organization in written texts: Arabic and English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 37(4). 291-305. Mohamed, M. T. & C. Clifton. 2008. Processing inferential causal statements: Theoretical refinements and the role of verb type. Discourse Processes 45(1). 24-51. Mokhtari, Noureddine & Olivier Corby. 2009. Modelling and automatic extracing of contextual semantic annotations. Proceedings of I-KNOW ’09 and I-SEMANTICS ’09 (pp. 248-258). Graz, Austria. Molina, Alejandro, Juan Manuel Torres-Moreno, Iria Da Cunha, Eric San Juan & Gerardo Sierra. 2012. Sentence compression in Spanish driven by discourse segmentation and language models. Molina, M. & V. Flores. 2006. Generating adaptive presentations of hydrologic behavior. In Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - Ideal 2006, Proceedings (Vol. 4224, pp. 896-903). Mooney, David, Sandra Carberry & Kathleen McCoy. 1990. The basic block model of extended explanations. Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 5) (pp. 112-119). Dawson, Pennsylvania. Moore, Johanna D & Vibhu Mittal. 1996. Dynamically generated follow-up questions. Computer 29(7). 75-&. Moore, Johanna D & Cécile Paris. 1993. Planning text for advisory dialogues: Capturing intentional and rhetorical information. Computational Linguistics 19(4). 651-694. Moore, Johanna D & Martha E Pollack. 1992. A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics 18(4). 537-544. Moore, Tim & Janne Morton. 1999. Authenticity in the IELTS academic module writing test (No. Report 4): IELTS.

Page 35 of 58

Morales Morante, Luis Fernando. 2012. Estructura y sentido de la noticia televisiva: Parámetros para la construcción y el análisis del mensaje en el entorno audiovisual (Structure and meaning of television news: Parameters for the construction and analysis of the message in the audiovisual environment). Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 18(2). 805-821. Moreale, E. & M. Vargas-Vera. 2004. Semantic services in e-Learning: An argumentation case study. Educational Technology & Society 7(4). 112-128. Mori, Yoshiki. 1996. Multiple discourse relations on the sentential level in Japanese. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96) (Vol. 2, pp. 788-793). Copenhagen, Denmark. Morris, S. J. & A. C. W. Finkelstein. 1999. Engineering via discourse: Content structure as an essential component for multimedia documents. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 9(6). 691-724. Moser, Megan & Johanna D Moore. 1995. Investigating cue selection and placement in tutorial discourse. Proceedings of 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'95) (pp. 130-135). Cambridge, Massachusetts. Moser, Megan & Johanna D Moore. 1995. Using discourse analysis and automatic text generation to study discourse cue usage. Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation (pp. 92-98). Stanford, California. Moser, Megan & Johanna D Moore. 1996. Towards a synthesis of two accounts of discourse structure. Computational Linguistics 22(3). 410-419. Muntigl, Peter & Helmut Gruber. 2005. Introduction: Approaches to genre. Folia Linguistica 39(1-2). 1- 18. Murray, Gabriel, Maite Taboada & Steve Renals. 2006. Prosodic correlates of rhetorical relations. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2006 Workshop on "Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech" (pp. 1- 7). New York. Nakano, Yukiko & Tsuenaki Kato. 1998. Cue phrase selection in instruction dialogue using machine learning. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 100-106). Montréal, Canada. Navaneethakrishnan, Subalaitha Chinnaudayar & Ranjani Parthasarathi. 2014. Building a language- independent discourse parser using universal networking language. Computational Intelligence. in press. Neff, M., M. Kipp, I. Albrecht & H. P. Seidel. 2008. Gesture modeling and animation based on a probabilistic re-creation of speaker style. Acm Transactions on Graphics 27(1). Ng, Jun-Ping, Min-Yen Kan, Ziheng Lin, Wei Feng, Bin Chen, Jian Su & Chew-Lim Tan. 2013. Exploiting discourse analysis for article-wide temporal classification. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Seattle, WA. Nicholas, Nick. 1994. Problems in the Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory to Text Generation. Melbourne: University of MelbourneThesis Type.

Page 36 of 58

Nicholas, Nick. 1995. Parameters for Rhetorical Structure Theory ontology. University of Melbourne Working Papers in Linguistics 15. 77-93. Niekrasz, John. 2012. Towards summarization of communicative activities in spoken conversation. Edinburgh: University of EdinburghThesis Type. Nikitina, Olga & Sebastian Padó. 2013. A corpus study of clause combination. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2013). Potsdam, Germany. Nir, Bracha & Ruth A. Berman. 2010. Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics 42(3). 744-765. Nomoto, Tadashi. 2004. Machine Learning Approaches to Rhetorical Parsing and Open-Domain Text Summarization. Nara, Japan: Nara Institute of Science and TechnologyThesis Type. Nomoto, Tadashi & Yuji Matsumoto. 1999. Learning discourse relations with active data selection. Proceedings of Joint ACL-SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora (pp. 158-167). College Park, Maryland. Noordman, Leo, Ingrid Dassen, Mar Swerts & Jacques Terken. 1999. Prosodic markers of text structure. In Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 131-148). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Noordman, Leo & W. Vonk. 1992. Readers knowledge and the control of inferences in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes 7(3-4). 373-391. Noordman, Leo, W. Vonk & H. Kempff. 1992. Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language 31. 573-590. Not, Elena. 1996. A computational model for generating referring expressions in a multilingual application domain. The 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96) (Vol. 2, pp. 848-853). Copenhagen, Denmark. Not, Elena & Massimo Zancanaro. 2000. The MacroNode approach: Mediating between adaptive and dynamic hypermedia. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Web-Based Systems (pp. 166-178). Trento, Italy. Oates, Sarah Louise. 1999. State of the Art Report on Discourse Markers and Relations. Brighton, UK: University of Brighton, Information Technology Research Institute. Oates, Sarah Louise. 2000. Multiple discourse marker occurrence: Creating hierarchies for Natural Language Generation. ANLP-NAACL 2000 Student Research Workshop (pp. 41-45). Seattle, Washington. Oberlander, Jon & Chris Mellish. 1998. Final Report on the ILEX Project. Edinburgh, UK: Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh. Oberlander, Jon & Johanna D Moore. 1999. Cue phrases in discourse: Further evidence for the core:Contributor distinction. Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse (pp. 87-93). Edinburgh, UK. Oberlander, Jon & Johanna D Moore. 2001. Discourse cues: Further evidence for the core-contributor distinction. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3). 317-332.

Page 37 of 58

O'Brien, Sharon. 2013. The borrowers: Researching the cognitive aspects of translation. Target - International Journal of Translation Studies 25(1). 5-17. O'Brien, Theresa. 1995. Rhetorical structure analysis and the case of the inaccurate, incoherent source- hopper. Applied Linguistics 16(4). 442-482. O'Donnell, Michael. 1997. RST-Tool: An RST analysis tool. Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Duisburg, Germany. O'Donnell, Michael. 2000. RSTTool 2.4: A markup tool for Rhetorical Structure Theory. First International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG'2000) (pp. 253-256). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. O'Donnell, Michael, Hua Cheng & Janet Hitzeman. 1998. Integrating referring and informing in NP planning. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on The Computational Treatment of Nominals (pp. 46-55). Montréal, Canada. O'Donnell, Michael, Chris Mellish, Jon Oberlander & Alistair Knott. 2001. ILEX: An architecture for a dynamic Hypertext generation system. Natural Language Engineering 7. 225-250. Oishi, Akira & Yuji Matsumoto. 1998. Recognition of the coherence relation between te-linked clauses. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 990-996). Montréal, Canada. Okazaki, N., Y. Matsuo & M. Ishizuka. 2004. Coherent arrangement of sentences extracted from multiple newspaper articles. In Pricai 2004: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings (Vol. 3157, pp. 882-891). Okoro, Efeosasere Moibi. 2013. A study of different representation conventions during investigatory sensemaking. London: Middlesex UniversityThesis Type. Olson, Michael L. 1981. Barai Clause Junctures: Toward a Functional Theory of Interclausal Relations. Australian National UniversityThesis Type. Omar, K., B. Alkhatib & M. Dashash. 2013. The implementation of plagiarism detection system in health sciences publications in Arabic and English languages. International Review on Computers and Software 8(4). 915-919. Ono, Kenji, Kazuo Sumita & Seiji Miike. 1994. Abstract generation based on rhetorical structure extraction. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'94) (Vol. 1, pp. 344-348). Kyoto, Japan. Orrego, Magglio Chiuminatto. 2011. Relaciones texto-imagen en el libro álbum. Universum 26(1). 59- 77. Oswald, Steve & Alain Rihs. 2013. Metaphor as argument: Rhetorical and epistemic advantages of extended metaphors. Argumentation. Otterbacher, Jahna, Dragomir Radev & Airong Luo. 2002. Revisions that improve cohesion in multi- document summaries: A preliminary study. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Automatic Summarization (pp. 27-36). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Page 38 of 58

Ou, S. Y., C. S. G. Khoo & D. H. Goh. 2003. Multi-document summarization of dissertation abstracts using a variable-based framework. In Asist 2003: Proceedings of the 66th Asist Annual Meeting, Vol 40, 2003 (Vol. 40, pp. 230-239). Ou, S. Y., C. S. G. Khoo & D. H. Goh. 2006. Multi-document summarization of news articles using an event-based framework. Aslib Proceedings 58(3). 197-217. Pander Maat, Henk. 1998. Classifying negative coherence relations on the basis of linguistic evidence. Journal of Pragmatics 30(2). 177-204. Pander Maat, H. 1999. The differential linguistic realization of comparative and additive coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics 10(2). 147-184. Pander Maat, Henk & Liesbeth Degand. 2001. Scaling causal relations and connectives in terms of speaker Involvement. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3). 211-245. Pander Maat, Henk & Ted Sanders. 2001. Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empirical study of language in use. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3). 247-273. Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro & Maria das Graças Volpe Nunes. 2006. Review and evaluation of DiZer - An automatic discourse analyzer for Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Computational Processing of Written and Spoken Portuguese – PROPOR (pp. 180-189). Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil. Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro & Maria das Graças Volpe Nunes. 2008. On the development and evaluation of a Brazilian Portuguese discourse parser. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Computing 15(2). 43-64. Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro, Maria das Graças Volpe Nunes & Lucia Helena Machado Rino. 2004. DiZer: An automatic discourse analyzer for Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of First International Workshop on Natural Language Understanding and Cognitive Science (NLUCS 2004). Porto, Portugal. Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro & Lucia Helena Machado Rino. 2001. A summary planner based on a three-level discourse model. Proceedings of Natural Language Processing Pacific Rim Symposium (pp. 533-538). Tokyo, Japan. Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro & Lucia Helena Machado Rino. 2002. DMSumm: Review and assessment. Proceedings of Advances in Natural Language Processing, Third International Conference (PorTAL 2002) (pp. 263-274). Faro, Portugal. Paris, Cécile. 2002. Information delivery for tourism. Ieee Intelligent Systems 17(6). 61-63. Paris, Cécile, Nathalie Colineau, Andrew Lampert & Joan Giralt Duran. 2008. Fit it in but say it well! Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2008 (pp. 133-141). Hobart, Australia. Paris, Cécile & Donia Scott. 1994. Intentions, structure, and expression in multi-lingual instructions. Proceedings Seventh International Conference on Natural Language Generation (pp. 45-52). Kennebunkport, ME. Paris, Cécile, S. Wan, R. Wilkinson & M. F. Wu. 2001. Generating personal travel guides - And who wants them? In User Modeling 2001, Proceedings (Vol. 2109, pp. 251-253).

Page 39 of 58

Paris, Cécile, M. F. Wu, Keith Vander Linden, M. Post & S. J. Lu. 2004. Myriad: An architecture for contextualized information retrieval and delivery. In Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, Proceedings (Vol. 3137, pp. 205-214). Passonneau, Rebecca & Diane J. Litman. 1997. Discourse segmentation by human and automated means. Computational Linguistics 23(1). 103-139. Pastra, Katerina. 2008. COSMOROE: A cross-media relations framework for modelling multimedia dialectics. Multimedia Systems 14(5). 299-323. Patry, R. 1992. The Problem of Cohesive Force - Is It a Question of Distance or of Function. Linguistique 28(2). 17-33. Patterson, Gary & Andrew Kehler. 2013. Predicting the presence of discourse connectives. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 914-923). Seattle, WA. Pechsiri, Chaveevan, Onuma Moolwat & Uraiwan Janviriyasopak. 2013. Symptom-treatment relation extraction from web documents for contruct know-how map. In Andrzej M.J. Skulimowski (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems (KICSS) (pp. 497-508). Kraków: Progress and Business Publishers. Pelsmaekers, Katja, Chris Braecke & Ronald Geluykens. 1998. Rhetorical relations and subordination in L2 writing. In Antonia Sánchez-Macarro & Ronald Carter (eds.), Linguistic Choice across Genres: Variation in Spoken and Written English (pp. 191-213). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Peng, Gracie. 2009. Using Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) to describe the development of coherence in interpreting trainees. Interpreting 11(2). 216-243. Perfetti, C. A. 1997. Sentences, individual differences, and multiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension. Discourse Processes 23(3). 337-355. Péry-Woodley, Marie-Paule. 1998. Signalling in written text: A corpus-based approach. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 79-85). Montréal, Canada. Péry-Woodley, Marie-Paule. 2001. Modes d'organisation et de signalisation dans des textes procéduraux. Langages 141. 28-46. Pianta, Emanuele & Elena Not. 1997. A Modular Text Planning Architecture for a Multilingual Setting (No. Ref. No. 9701-06). Trento, Italy: ITC-IRST. Pineda, L. & G. Garza. 2000. A model for multimodal reference resolution. Computational Linguistics 26(2). 139-193. Pisanski Peterlin, Agnes. 2006. Iskanje pragmaticnih enot v neoznacenem korpusu: primer kažipotov. Proceedings of the Fifth Slovenian and First International Language Technologies Conference. Ljubljana, Slovenia. Poesio, Massimo, Barbara Di Eugenio & Gerard Keohane. 2002. Discourse Structure and Anaphora: An Empirical Study (NLE Technical Note No. TN-02-02): University of Essex.

Page 40 of 58

Poesio, Massimo, Amrita Patel & Barbara Di Eugenio. 2006. Discourse structure and anaphora in tutorial dialogues: An empirical analysis of two theories of global focus. Research on Language and Computation 4. 229-257. Poláková, Lucie, Jiri Mírovský, Anna Nedoluzhko, Pavlína Jínová, Sárka Zikánová & Eva Hajicová. 2013. Introducing the Prague Discourse Treebank 1.0. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 91-99). Nagoya, Japan. Polanyi, Livia & Martin van den Berg. 1999. Logical structure and discourse anaphora resolution. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Relation of Discourse/Dialogue Structure and Reference in the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-99) (pp. 110-118). College Park, Maryland. Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2001. Connectives/discourse markers: An overview. Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis Literaris 6. 219-243. Potter, Andrew. 2007. A discourse approach to explanation aware knowledge representation. In T. Roth-Berghofer, S. Schulz, D. B. Leake & D Bahls (eds.), Explanation-Aware Computing: Papers from the 2007 AAAI Workshop (pp. 56-63). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. Potter, Andrew. 2007. An Investigation of Interactional Coherence in Asynchronous Learning Environments. Fort Lauderdale, USA: Nova Southeastern UniversityThesis Type. Potter, Andrew. 2008. Constructive chaos: Interactional coherence in asynchronous learning environments. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag. Potter, Andrew. 2008. Generating discourse-based explanations. Künstliche Intelligenz 22(2). 28-31. Potter, Andrew. 2008. Interactional coherence in asynchronous learning networks: A rhetorical approach. The Internet and Higher Education 11(2). 87-97. Potter, Andrew. 2008. Linked and convergent structures in discourse-based reasoning. ECAI 2008 Workshop on Explanation Aware Computing (ExaCt 2008). Patras, Greece. Potter, Andrew. 2009. Constructive chaos: Topic management in asynchronous learning networks. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society 5(3). 1-12. Potter, Andrew. 2009. Discourse-based reasoning for controlled natural languages. Proceedings of the Workshop on Controlled Natural Language (CNL 2009). Marettimo Island, Italy. Poveda Cabanes, Pamela. 2010. La estructura retórica de la memoria de arquitectura de divulgación: Un análisis de género (The rhetorical structure of the architecture design statement for dissemination: A genre analysis). Ibérica 19. 55-76. Power, Richard, Christine Doran & Donia Scott. 1999. Generating Embedded Discourse Markers from Rhetorical Structure (Technical Report No. ITRI-99-15). Brighton, UK: University of Brighton, Information Technology Research Institute. Power, Richard, Donia Scott & Nadjet Bouayad-Agha. 2003. Document structure. Computational Linguistics 29(2). 211-260. Prasad, Rashmi, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee, Aravind K Joshi & Bonnie Webber. 2007. Attribution and its annotation in the Penn Discourse TreeBank. Traitement Automatique des Langues 47(2). 43-63.

Page 41 of 58

Prévot, Laurent. 2004. Structures sémantiques et pragmatiques pour la modélisation de la cohérence dans des dialogues finalisés. Toulouse: Université Paul SabatierThesis Type. Prévot, Laurent, Laure Vieu & Nicholas Asher. 2009. Une formalisation plus précise pour une annotation moins confuse: la relation d'Élaboration d'entité. Journal of French Language Studies 19(2). 207-228. Prust, H., R. Scha & M. Vandenberg. 1994. Discourse grammar and verb phrase anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 17(3). 261-327. Rada, R., W. G. Wang & A. Birchall. 1993. Retrieval hierarchies in hypertext. Information Processing and Management 29(3). 359-371. Radev, Dragomir. 2000. A common theory of information fusion from multiple text sources. Step one: Cross document structure. Proceedings of 1st SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 74- 83). Hong Kong. Radev, Dragomir, Hongyan Jing, Malgorzata Stys & Daniel Tam. 2004. Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents. Information Processing and Management 40. 919-938. Radev, Dragomir, Jahna Otterbacher & Zhu Zhang. 2004. CST Bank: A corpus for the study of cross- document structural relationships. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC. Lisbon, Portugal. Rambow, Owen. 1990. Domain communication knowledge. Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 87-94). Dawson, Pennsylvania. Rambow, Owen (ed.). 1993. Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations. Columbus, Ohio: ACL. Rambow, Owen. 1993. Rhetoric as knowledge. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 102-105). Columbus, Ohio. Ramezani, Majid & Mohammad-Reza Feizi-Derakhshi. 2014. Automated text summarization: An overview. Applied Artificial Intelligence 28(2). 178-215. Ramsay, Guy. 2000. Linearity in rhetorical organisation: A comparative cross-cultural analysis of newstext from the People's Republic of China and Australia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(2). 241-258. Ramsay, Guy. 2001. Rhetorical styles and newstexts: A contrastive analysis of rhetorical relations in Chinese and Australian news-journal text. E-Journal of Asian Linguistics and Language Teaching 1(1). Ramsay, Guy. 2001. What are they getting at? Placement of important ideas in Chinese newstext: A contrastive analysis with Australian newstext. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 24(2). 17-34. Ramsay, Guy. 2008. Shaping Minds: A Discourse Analysis of Chinese-Language Community Mental Health. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Raneburger, David, Roman Popp & Hermann Kaindl. 2013. Design alternatives for GUI development with discourse-based communication models. In Matthias Horbach (ed.), Informatik angepasst an Mensch, Organisation und Umwelt (INFORMATIK 2013) (pp. 2689-2701). Koblenz: Gesellschaft für Informatik.

Page 42 of 58

Rebeyrolle, Josette, Marie-Paule Jacques & Marie-Paule Péry-Woodley. 2009. Titres et intertitres dans l'organisation du discours. Journal of French Language Studies 39(2). 269-290. Redeker, Gisela. 1991. Review article: Linguistic markers of linguistic structure. Linguistics 29(6). 1139- 1172. Redeker, Gisela. 2000. Coherence and structure in text and discourse. In William Black & Harry Bunt (eds.), Abduction, Belief, and Context in Dialogue. Studies in Computational Pragmatics (pp. 233- 263). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Redeker, Gisela. 2006. Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 339-358). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Redeker, Gisela, Ildikó Berzlánovich, Nynke van der Vliet, Gosse Bouma & Markus Egg. 2012. Multi- layer discourse annotation of a Dutch corpus. Proceedings of the Conference on Language Resources and Annotation (LREC) (pp. 2820-2825). Istanbul, Turkey. Redeker, Gisela & Markus Egg. 2006. Says who? On the treatment of speech attributions in discourse structure. Proceedings of the Workshop “Constraints in Discourse” (pp. 140-146). Maynooth University, Ireland. Reece, John E. & Geoff Cumming. 2013. Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation, and the listening word processor. In C. Michael Levy & Sarah Ransdell (eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications (pp. 361-380). New York: Routledge. Reed, Chris & Aspassia Daskalopolu. 1998. Modelling contractual arguments. 4th International Conference on Argumentation (pp. 686-692). Amsterdam, Netherlands. Reed, Chris & Derek Long. 1997. Generating Punctuation in Written Documents (Technical Report No. RN/97/157). London, UK: Department of Computer Science, University College. Reed, Chris & Derek Long. 1997. Multiple subarguments in logic, argumentation, rhetoric and text generation. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Quantitative and Qualitative Practical Reasoning (pp. 496-510). Bad Honnef, Germany. Reed, Chris & Derek Long. 1997. Persuasive dialogue. Paper presented at the OSSA Conference on Argument and Rhetoric, St. Catherine's, Canada. Reed, Chris & Derek Long. 1998. Generating the structure of argument. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 1091-1097). Montréal, Canada. Reichart, Roi & Anna Korhonen. 2012. Document and corpus level inference for unsupervised learning of information structure of scientific documents. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). Mumbai, India. Reisert, Paul, Junta Mizuno, Miwa Kanno, Naoaki Okazaki & Kentaro Inui. 2014. An investigation of evidence relations within social media conversations. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Speech Processing Society (pp. 686-689). Sapporo, Japan.

Page 43 of 58

Reitter, David. 2002. Rhetorical Theory in LaTeX with the RST Package. Unpublished manuscript, Dublin, Ireland. Reitter, David. 2003. Rhetorical Analysis with Rich Feature Support Vector Models. Potsdam, Germany: University of PotsdamThesis Type. Reitter, David. 2003. Simple signals for complex rhetorics: On rhetorical analysis with rich-feature support vector models. Sprachthechnologie für die multilinguale Kommunikation. Sankt Augustin, Germany. Reitter, David. 2003. Simple signals for complex rhetorics: On rhetorical analysis with rich-feature support vector models. LDV-Forum, Journal for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology 18(1-2). 38-52. Reitter, David & Manfred Stede. 2003. Step by step: Underspecified markup in incremental rhetorical analysis. Proceedings of EACL 4th International Workshop on Interpreted Corpora. Budapest, Hungary. Relan, Mahima, Swati Khurana & Vivek Kumar Singh. 2013. Qualitative evaluation and improvement suggestions for eBooks using Text Analytics algorithms. In J. Mathew (ed.), Communication in Computing and Information Science. Berlin: Springer. Renkema, Jan. 2006. How to proceed with ambiguity in discourse relations? A proposal based on connectivity variables. Studies in Communication Sciences 6(1). 117-134. Renkema, Jan. 2008. Relaciones discursivas y variables de conectividad. Revista Signos 41(66). 65-80. Renkema, Jan. 2009. The Texture of Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Rienks, Rutger. 2007. Meetings in Smart Environments: Implications of Progressing Technology. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of TwenteThesis Type. Rino, Lucia Helena Machado, Ariani Di Felippo & Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo. 2013. Insights for better RST segmentation of texts in Portuguese. Proceedings of the IV Workshop on RST and Text Studies (pp. 30-39). Fortaleza, Brazil. Rino, Lucia Helena Machado, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo, Carlos Nascimento Silla, Celso Antonio Alves Kaestner & Michael Pombo. 2004. A comparison of automatic summarization systems for Brazilian Portuguese texts. Proceedings of the XVII Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (SBIA 2004). São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. Rino, Lucia Helena Machado & Donia Scott. 1996. A Discourse Model for Gist Preservation (Technical Report No. ITRI-96-12). Brighton, UK: University of Brighton, Information Technology Research Institute. Risselada, Rodie & Wilbert Spooren. 1998. Introduction: Discourse markers and coherence relations. Journal of Pragmatics 30. 131-133. Rittgen, P. 2008. A contract-based architecture for business networks. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 12(4). 115-145.

Page 44 of 58

Roberts, David L. & Charles L. Isbell. 2013. Lessons on using computationally generated influence for shaping narrative experiences. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games. to appear. Rocchi, Cesare & Massimo Zancanaro. 2003. Generation of video documentaries from discourse structures. Proceedings of 9th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (EWNLG 9). Budapest, Hungary. Romera, Magdalena. 2004. Discourse Functional Units: The Expression of Coherence Relations in Spoken Spanish. Munich: LINCOM. Rösner, Dietmar. 1993. Intentions, rhetoric, or discourse relations? A case from multilingual document generation. Proceedings of Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, ACL (pp. 106-109). Ohio State University. Rösner, Dietmar & Manfred Stede. 1992. Customizing RST for the automatic production of technical manuals. In Robert Dale, Eduard Hovy, Dietmar Rösner & Oliviero Stock (eds.), Aspects of Automated Language Generation (pp. 119-214). Berlin: Springer. Rossari, Corinne. 2001. Les relations de discours: Approches rhétoriques, approches pragmatiques et approches sémantiques. Verbum XXIII(1). 59-72. Rubin, Victoria & Tatiana Vashchilko. 2012. Identification of truth and deception in text: Application of Vector Space Model to Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of the EACL 2012 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection (pp. 97-106). Avignon, France. Rutledge, Lloyd, Brian Bailey, Jacco van Ossenbruggen, Lynda Hardman & Joost Geurts. 2000. Generating presentation constraints from rhetorical structure. Proceedings of 11th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 19-28). San Antonio, TX. Rutledge, Lloyd, Jim Davis, Jacco van Ossenbruggen & Lynda Hardman. 2000. Inter-dimensional hypermedia communicative devices for rhetorical structure. Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Modeling (MMM00) (pp. 89-105). Nagano, Japan. Safranj, Jelisaveta. 2007. Types of attribution relation in the Financial Times corpus. Proceedings of English Language and Literature Studies: Structures across Cultures, ELLSSAC. Belgrade. Safranj, Jelisaveta. 2008. Retoricka struktura u diskursu engleskog poslovnog jezika. Pedagoska stvarnost 54(9-10). 990-1003. Safranj, Jelisaveta. 2008. Rhetorical organization of business English newspaper articles. Proceedings of FLLAS International Conference: Language for Specific Purposes - Theory and Practice. Belgrade. Safranj, Jelisaveta. 2008. Rhetorical Structure in Business English Discourse. Belgrade: University of BelgradeThesis Type. Safranj, Jelisaveta. 2009. Retoricka organizacija poslovne vesti. Belgrade: Zaduzbina Andrejevic. Safranj, Jelisaveta. 2010. Discourse markers in the Financial Times corpus. Proceedings of English Language and Literature Studies:Image, Identity, Reality (ELLISIIR). Belgrade. Sagae, Kenji, Andrew S. Gordon, Morteza Dehghani, Mike Metke, Jackie S. Kim, Sarah I. Gimbel, Christine Tipper, Jonas Kaplan & Mary Helen Immordino-Yang. 2013. A data-driven approach for

Page 45 of 58

classification of subjectivity in personal narratives. Proceedings of the 2013 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative. Dagstuhl, Germany. Saksik, Rémy, Alejandro Molina, Andréa Carneiro Linhares & Juan Manuel Torres-Moreno. 2013. Segmentação discursiva automática: Uma avaliação preliminar em francês. Proceedings of the IV Workshop on RST and Text Studies (Vol. 50-58). Fortaleza, Brazil. Salkie, Raphael & Sarah Louise Oates. 1999. Contrast and Concession in French and English. Languages in Contrast 2(1). 27-56. Sanders, Ted. 1986. De invloed van globale teksteigenschappen op het begrijpen en onthouden van teksten (The influence of global properties of text on understanding and remembering text). Tilburg UniversityThesis Type. Sanders, Ted. 1997. Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes 24. 119-147. Sanders, Ted & Leo Noordman. 2000. The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes 29(1). 37-60. Sanders, Ted & Joost Schilperoord. 2008. Text structure as a window on the cognition of writing: How text analysis provides insights in writing products and writing processes. In Charles A MacArthur, Steve Graham & Jill Fitzgerald (eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 386-402). New York: Guilford Press. Sanders, Ted & Wilbert Spooren. 1999. Communicative intentions and coherence relations. In Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk & Eija Ventola (eds.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse: How to Create It and How to Describe It (pp. 235-250). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Sanders, Ted, Wilbert Spooren & Leo Noordman. 1992. Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15(1). 1-35. Sanders, Ted, Wilbert Spooren & Leo Noordman. 1993. Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics 4(2). 93-133. Sanders, Ted & Carel van Wijk. 1993. PISA A Procedure for Incremental Structure Analysis of Expository Texts. Unpublished manuscript, Utrecht, Netherlands. Sanders, Ted & Carel van Wijk. 1996. PISA: A procedure for analyzing the structure of explanatory texts. Text 16(1). 91-132. Sarjala, Marja. 1994. Signalling of reason and cause relations in academic discourse. Anglicana Turkuensia 13. 89-98. Sarkar, Abhishek & Pinaki Sankar Chatterjee. 2013. Identification of rhetorical structure relation from discourse marker in Bengali language understanding. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Science and Applications (pp. 42-45). Lucknow, India. Say, Bilge & Varol Akman. 1997. Current apporaches to punctuation in computational linguistics. Computers and the Humanities 30(6). 457-469. Schauer, Holger. 2000. From elementary discourse units to complex ones. Proceedings of 1st SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 46-55). Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

Page 46 of 58

Schauer, Holger. 2000. Referential structure and coherence structure. Proceedings of 7e conférence annuelle sur le traitement automatique des langues naturelles (TALN 2000) (pp. 327-336). Lausanne, Switzerland. Schauer, Holger & Udo Hahn. 2000. Phrases as carriers of coherence relations. Proceedings of 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 429-434). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Schauer, Holger & Udo Hahn. 2001. Anaphoric cues for coherence relations. Proceedings of International Euroconference 'Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing', RANLP 2001 (pp. 228-234). Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria. Scheppers, F. 2003. P(ragmatic)-trees. Coherence, intentionality and cognitive content in discourse and non-verbal action. Journal of Pragmatics 35(5). 665-694. Schiftner, Barbara. 2013. Analysing coherence in upper-intermediate learner writing. In Ana Díaz- Negrillo, Nicolas Ballier & Paul Thompson (eds.), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data (pp. 265-286). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Schilder, Frank. 1998. Temporal discourse markers and the flow of events. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 58-61). Montréal, Canada. Schilder, Frank. 1998. An underspecified segmented discourse representation theory. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 1188-1192). Montréal, Canada. Schilder, Frank. 2000. Robust text analysis via underspecification. Proceedings of 1st workshop on RObust Methods in Analysis of Natural language Data (ROMAND 2000) (pp. 105-120). Lausanne, Switzerland. Schilder, Frank. 2002. Robust discourse parsing via discourse markers, topicality and position. Natural Language Engineering 8(2/3). 235-255. Scott, Donia & Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. 1990. Getting the message across in RST-based text generation. In Robert Dale, Chris Mellish & Michael Zock (eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation (pp. 47-73). London: Academic Press. Scott, Donia, Judy Delin & Anthony Hartley. 1998. Identifying congruent pragmatic relations in procedural texts. Languages in Contrast 1(1). 45-82. Scott, Mike. 2001. Mapping key words to 'problem' and 'solution'. In Mike Scott & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Patterns of Text: In Honour of Michael Hoey (pp. 109-127). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Seville, Helen. 1999. Experiments with discourse structure. Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-3) (pp. 233-246). Tilburg, Netherlands. Sharma, Arjun Datt & Shaleen Deep. 2014. Too long-Didn't read: A practical web based approach towards text summarization. In Prosenjit Gupta & Christos Zaroliagis (eds.), Applied Algorithms: First International Conference, ICAA (pp. 198-208). Berlin: Springer.

Page 47 of 58

Sharoff, Serge & Lena Sokolova. 1995. Analysis of rhetorical structures in technical manuals and their multilingual generation. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multilingual Generation (IJCAI'95) (pp. 119-128). Montréal, Canada. Shaw, James. 1998. Clause agregation using linguistic knowledge. Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 9) (pp. 138-147). Niagra-on-the-Lake, Canada. Shinmori, Akihiro, Manabu Okumura, Yuzo Marukawa & Makoto Iwayama. 2002. Rhetorical structure analysis of Japanese patent claims using cue phrases. Proceedings of the 3rd NTCIR Workshop. Tokyo, Japan. Shoaib, M., S. Arshad, S. Jabeen & M.P. Tariq. 2010. Software quality metrics for Rhetorical Structure Theory based information retrieval systems. Pakistan Journal of Science 62(3). 177-184. Sibun, Penelope. 1992. Generating text without trees. Computational Intelligence 8(1). 102-122. Sidner, Candace L. 1993. On discourse relations, rhetorical relations and rhetoric. Proceedings of Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, ACL (pp. 122-124). Ohio State University. Siepmann, Dirk. 2005. Discourse Markers across Languages. New York: Routledge. Silva, Danúbia Aline. 2013. A relação retórica de condição na fala de Mariana (MG): Uma análise inicial. Proceedings of the IV Workshop on RST and Text Studies. Fortaleza, Brazil. Silvano, Purificação. 2012. The rhetorical relations in complex sentences with quando ('when') in European Portuguese Belgian Journal of Linguistics 19. 65-83. Sitter, Stefan & Elisabeth Maier. 1992. Rhetorical relations in a model of information-seeking dialogues. 10th. European Conference on Artificial Itelligence. Vienna, Austria. Sizov, Gleb & Pinar Öztürk. 2013. Automatic extraction of reasoning chains from textual reports. Proceedings of the TextGraphs-8 Workshop (pp. 61-69). Seattle, WA. Smith, Caroline L. 2004. Topic transitions and durational prosody in reading aloud: Production and modeling. Speech Communication 42(3-4). 247-270. Smith, Eliot. 1997. A Computational Model of On-Line Story Understanding (Thesis Progress Report). Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham. Soria, Claudia & Giacomo Ferrari. 1998. Lexical marking of discourse relations: Some experimental findings. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 36-42). Montréal, Canada. Soricut, Radu & Daniel Marcu. 2003. Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information. Proceedings of Human Language Technology and North American Association for Computational Linguistics Conference (HLT-NAACL'03) (pp. 149-156). Edmonton, Canada. Souza, Edson Rosa Francisco de. 2008. A noção de discurso em modelos teóricos. Signum: Estudos da Linguagem 11(1). 237-256. Souza, Edson Rosa Francisco de. 2009. Gramaticalização dos itens linguisticos assim, já e aí no português brasileiro: um estudo sob a perspectiva da gramática discursivo-funcional

Page 48 of 58

[Grammaticalization of linguistic items assim, ja and ai in Brazilian Portuguese: A functional discourse grammar approach]. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, BrazilThesis Type. Sparck-Jones, Karen. 1995. Discourse modelling for automatic summarising. In Eva Hajicová, Miroslav Cervenka, Oldrich Leška & Petr Sgall (eds.), Prague Linguistic Circle Papers (Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague nouvelle série) (pp. 201-227). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Spenader, Jennifer & Anna Lobanova. 2009. Reliable discourse markers for contrast relations. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Semantics. Tilburg, The Netherlands. Spooren, Wilbert. 1997. The processing of underspecified coherence relations. Discourse Processes 24. 149-168. Spooren, Wilbert & Liesbeth Degand. 2010. Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2). 241-266. Spooren, Wilbert & Ted Sanders. 2008. The acquisition order of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40(12). 2003-2026. Sporleder, Caroline. 2007. Manually vs. automatically labelled data in discourse relation classification. Effects of example and feature selection. LDV-Forum, Journal for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology 22(1). 1-20. Sporleder, Caroline & Mirella Lapata. 2005. Discourse chunking and its application to sentence compression. Proceedings of the 2005 Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP-05). Vancouver, Canada. Sporleder, Caroline & Alex Lascarides. 2005. Exploiting linguistic cues to classify rhetorical relations. Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP-05). Borovets, Bulgaria. Sporleder, Caroline & Alex Lascarides. 2008. Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: An assesment. Natural Language Engineering 14(3). 369-416. Stadlhofer, Bernd, Peter Salhofer & Augustin Drulacher. 2013. An overview of ontology engineering methodologies in the context of public administration. Proceedings of SEMAPRO 2013: The Seventh International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing (pp. 36-42). Porto, Portugal. Stede, M. 2004. Does discourse processing need discourse topics? Theoretical Linguistics 30(2-3). 241- 253. Stede, Manfred. 2004. The Potsdam commentary corpus. Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Annotation, 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Barcelona, Spain. Stede, Manfred. 2008. Disambiguating rhetorical structure. Research in Language and Computation 6. 311-332. Stede, Manfred. 2008. RST Revisited: Disentangling nuclearity. In Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds.), 'Subordination' versus 'Coordination' in Sentence and Text (pp. 33-58). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Stede, Manfred. 2012. Discourse Processing: Morgan & Claypool.

Page 49 of 58

Stede, Manfred & Silvan Heintze. 2004. Machine-assisted rhetorical structure annotation. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING-04. Geneva, Switzerland. Stede, Manfred & Andreas Peldszus. 2012. The role of illocutionary status in the usage conditions of causal connectives and in coherence relations. Journal of Pragmatics 44(2). 214-229. Stede, Manfred & Birte Schmitz. 2000. Discourse particles and discourse functions. Machine Translation 15(1-2). 125-147. Stede, Manfred & Carla Umbach. 1998. DiMLex: A lexicon of discourse markers for text generation and understanding. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 1238- 1242). Montréal, Canada. Stede, Manfred, Leo Wanner & Eduard Hovy (eds.). 1998. Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers. Montréal, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics. Steen, Gerard. 1999. Analyzing metaphor in literature: With examples from William Wordsworth's 'I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud'. Poetics Today 20(3). 499-522. Steen, Gerard. 2002. Identifying metaphor in language: A cognitive approach. Style 36(3). 386-407. Steen, Gerard. 2004. Can discourse properties of metaphor affect metaphor recognition? Journal of Pragmatics 36(7). 1295-1313. Stent, Amanda. 2000. Rhetorical structure in dialog. Proceedings of First International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG'2000) (pp. 247-252). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. Stent, Amanda & Martín Molina. 2009. Evaluating automatic extraction of rules for sentence plan construction. Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGDIAL Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 290- 297). London, UK. Stepanov, Evgeny A. & Giuseppe Riccardi. 2013. Comparative evaluation of argument extraction algorithms in discourse relation parsing. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (pp. 39-44). Nara, Japan. Stewart, Anne Merrill. 1987. Clause-Combining in Conchucos Quechua Discourse. University of California Los AngelesThesis Type. Stock, Oliviero. 1993. ALFRESCO: Enjoing the combination of natural language processing and hypermedia for information exploration. In Mark Maybury (ed.), Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces (pp. 197-224). Menlo Park; CA: AAAI Press. Subalalitha, C N & Ranjani Parthasarathi. 2012. An approach to discourse parsing using sangati and Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of the Workshop on Machine Translation and Parsing in Indian Languages (MTPIL-2012) (pp. 73-82). Mumbai, India. Subalalitha, Chinnaudayar Navaneethakrishnan & Parthasarathi Ranjani. 2013. A unique indexing technique for discourse structures. Journal of Intelligent Systems. in press. Subba, Rajen. 2007. Exploiting event semantics to parse the rhetorical structure of natural language text. Proceedings of Doctoral Consortium, North American Association for Computational Linguistics. Rochester, NY.

Page 50 of 58

Subba, Rajen & Barbara Di Eugenio. 2009. An effective discourse parser that uses rich linguistic information. Proceedings of HLT-ACL 2009 (pp. 566-574). Boulder, CO. Subba, Rajen, Barbara Di Eugenio & Su Nam Kim. 2006. Discourse parsing: Learning FOL rules based on rich verb semantic representations to automatically label rhetorical relations. Workshop "Learning from structured data" at the 11th Conference of European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 33-40). Trento, Italy. Sumita, Kazuo, Kenji Ono, T. Chino, T. Ukita & S. Amano. 1992. A discourse structure analyzer for Japanese text. Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems (pp. 1133-1140). Tokyo, Japan. Sutcliffe, A. & P. Faraday. 1994. Systematic Design for Task-Related Multimedia Interfaces. Information and Software Technology 36(4). 225-234. Sutcliffe, A. G., S. Kurniawan & J. E. Shin. 2006. A method and advisor tool for multimedia user interface design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(4). 375-392. T’sou, Benjamin K., Tom B. Y. Lai, Samuel W. K. Chan, Weijun Gao & Xuegang Zhan. 2000. Enhancement of a Chinese discourse marker tagger with C 4.5. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd Chinese Language Processing Workshop, ACL, Hong Kong. Taboada, Maite. 2001. Collaborating through Talk: The Interactive Construction of Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. Madrid: Universidad ComplutenseThesis Type. Taboada, Maite. 2004. Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Taboada, Maite. 2004. Rhetorical relations in dialogue: A contrastive study. In Carol L. Moder & Aida Martinovic-Zic (eds.), Discourse across Languages and Cultures (pp. 75-97). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Taboada, Maite. 2006. Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics 38(4). 567-592. Taboada, Maite. 2008. SFU Review Corpus [Corpus]. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University, http://www.sfu.ca/~mtaboada/research/SFU_Review_Corpus.html. Taboada, Maite & Debopam Das. 2013. Annotation upon annotation: Adding signalling information to a corpus of discourse relations. Dialogue and Discourse 4(2). 249-281. Taboada, Maite & Christopher Habel. 2013. Rhetorical relations in multimodal documents. Discourse Studies 15(1). 59-85. Taboada, Maite & Julia Lavid. 2003. Rhetorical and thematic patterns in scheduling dialogues: A generic characterization. Functions of Language 10(2). 147-179. Taboada, Maite & William C. Mann. 2006. Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Discourse Studies 8(4). 567-588. Taboada, Maite & William C. Mann. 2006. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies 8(3). 423-459.

Page 51 of 58

Taboada, Maite & Jan Renkema. 2008. Discourse relations reference corpus [Corpus]. Vancouver and Tilburg: Simon Fraser University and Tilburg University, http://www.sfu.ca/rst/06tools/discourse_relations_corpus.html. Takeshita, Atsushi , Takafumi Inoue, Kazuo Tanaka & Toru Nakagawa. 1997. Method and apparatus for recognizing topic structure of language data. United States Patent 5,642,520: Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation. Tappe, Heike & Frank Schilder. 1998. Coherence in spoken discourse. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 1294-1298). Montréal, Canada. Taylor, P. J. 2002. A cylindrical model of communication behavior in crisis negotiations. Human Communication Research 28(1). 7-48. Taylor, P. J. & I. Donald. 2004. The structure of communication behavior in simulated and actual crisis negotiations. Human Communication Research 30(4). 443-478. Teijssen, Daphne, Hans van Halteren, Suzan Verberne & Lou Boves. 2008. Features for automatic discourse analysis of paragraphs. Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN 2007) (pp. 53-68). Leuven, Belgium. Tetreault, Joel R. 2005. Decomposing discourse. In António Branco, Tony McEnery & Ruslan Mitkov (eds.), Anaphora Processing: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modelling (pp. 73-95). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Teufel, Simone. 1999. Argumentative Zoning: Information Extraction from Scientific Text. Edinburgh: University of EdinburghThesis Type. Teufel, Simone, Jean Carletta & Marc Moens. 1999. An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles. Proceedings of 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'99) (pp. 110-117). Bergen, Norway. Teufel, Simone & Marc Moens. 2002. Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical structure. Computational Linguistics 28(4). 409-445. Thanh, Huong Le, Geetha Abeysinghe & Christian Huyck. 2004. Automated discourse segmentation by syntactic information and cue phrases. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Innsbruck. Thielemann, Nadine. 2007. Dissension markers and their function in argumentative interaction. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 52(2). 326-352. Thomas, Stephen F. 1995. Rhetorical Structure Theory. Studies in Machine Translation and Natural Language Processing 9. 159-174. Thompson, G. 2005. But me some buts: A multidimensional view of conjunction. Text 25(6). 763-791. Thompson, Sandra A. & William C. Mann. 1987. Antithesis: A study in clause combining and discourse structure. In Ross Steele & Terry Threadgold (eds.), Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, Volume II (pp. 359-381). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Page 52 of 58

Thompson, Sandra A. & William C. Mann. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A framework for the analysis of texts. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1). 79-105. Timmerman, Sander E.J. 2007. Automatic Recognition of Structural Relations in Dutch Text. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of TwenteThesis Type. Torrance, Mark & Nadjet Bouayad-Agha. 2001. Rhetorical structure analysis as a method for understanding writing processes. In Liesbeth Degand, Yves Bestgen, Wilbert Spooren & Luuk van Waes (eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Discourse. Amsterdam: Nodus. Trail, Ronald L. & Austin Hale. 1995. A Rhetorical Structure Analysis of a Kalasha Narrative. Horsleys Green: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Traum, David. 1993. Rhetorical relations, action and intentionality in conversation. Proceedings of ACL SIG Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 132-135). Columbus, Ohio. Trnavac, Radoslava & Maite Taboada. 2012. The contribution of nonveridical rhetorical relations to evaluation in discourse. Language Sciences 34(3). 301-318. Tu, Mei, Yu Zhou & Chengqing Zong. 2013. A novel translation framework based on Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 370-374). Sofia, Bulgaria. Umbach, Carla. 2005. Contrast and information structure: a focus-based analysis of but. Linguistics 43(1). 207-232. Unger, Christoph. 1996. The scope of discourse connectives: Implications for discourse organization. Journal of Linguistics 32. 403-438. Uzêda, Vinícius Rodrigues de, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo & Maria das Graças Volpe Nunes. 2007. Estudo e Avaliação de Métodos de Sumarização Automática de Textos Baseados na RST (Technical Report No. NILC-TR-07-07). São Carlos, Brazil: Núcleo Interinstitucional de Lingüística Computacional. Uzêda, Vinícius Rodrigues de, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo & Maria das Graças Volpe Nunes. 2009. A comprehensive summary informativeness evaluation for RST-based summarization methods. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications - IJCISIM 1. 188-196. Uzêda, Vinícius Rodrigues de, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo & Maria das Graças Volpe Nunes. 2010. A comprehensive comparative evaluation of RST-based summarization methods. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing 6(1-20). Uzuner, Ozlem, Randall Davis & Boris Katz. 2003. Using Discourse-Based Text Features for Evaluating Text Similarity. Unpublished manuscript. van der Vliet, Nynke, Ildikó Berzlánovich, Gosse Bouma, Markus Egg & Gisela Redeker. 2011. Building a discourse-annotated Dutch text corpus. Proceedings of the Workshop "Beyond Semantics: Corpus- based annotations of Pragmatics and Discourse Phenomena (pp. 157-171). Göttingen, Germany. van Eijk, Jan & Hans Kamp. 1996. Representing Discourse in Context (Article for submission No. CS- R9610). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica.

Page 53 of 58

Van Kuppevelt, J. 1995. Main structure and side structure in discourse. Linguistics 33(4). 809-833. Van Kuppevelt, J. 1996. Inferring from topics - Scalar implicatures as topic-dependent inferences. Linguistics and Philosophy 19(4). 393-443. van Wijk, Carel & Ted Sanders. 1999. Identifying writing strategies through text analysis. Written Communication 16(1). 51-75. Vander Linden, Keith. 1994. Generating precondition expressions in instructional text. Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'94) (pp. 42-49). Las Cruces, New Mexico. Vander Linden, Keith, Susanna Cumming & James H. Martin. 1992. The Expression of Local Rhetorical Relations in Instructional Text (Technical Report No. CU-CS-585-92). Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado, Boulder. Vander Linden, Keith , Susanna Cumming & James H. Martin. 1992. Using system networks to build rhetorical structures. In Robert Dale, Eduard Hovy, Dietmar Rösner & Oliviero Stock (eds.), Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation (pp. 183-198). Berlin: Springer. Vander Linden, Keith & James Martin. 1995. Expressing rhetorical relations in instructional text: A case study of the purpose relation. Computational Linguistics 21(1). 29-57. Verberne, Suzan, Lou Boves, Peter-Arno Coppen & Nelleke Oostdijk. 2007. Exploring discourse structure for Why-QA. Paper presented at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference, Göteborg, Sweden. Verdejo, Felisa & Thanasis Daradoumis. 1995. Using rhetorical relations in building a coherent conversational teaching session. In Robbert-Jan Beun, Michael Baker & Miriam Reiner (eds.), Dialogue and Instruction: Modeling Interaction in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 56-71). Berlin: Springer. Verhagen, Arie. 2001. Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or: Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements. In Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord & Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects (pp. 337-357). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Versley, Yannick & Anna Gastel. 2012. Linguistic tests for discourse relations in the TüBa-D/Z corpus of written German. Dialogue and Discourse. in press. Vet, Co. 1999. Temps verbaux, relations rhetoriques et chaines topicales (Verb tense, rhetorical relations, and topical chains). Travaux de Linguistique 39. 59-75. Virtanen, Tuija. 1995. Analysing argumentative strategies: A reply to a complaint. Anglicana Turkuensia 14. 539-547. Vivanco, Verónica. 2005. The absence of connectives and the maintenance of coherence in publicity texts. Journal of Pragmatics 37(8). 1233-1249. Voll, Kimberly & Maite Taboada. 2007. Not all words are created equal: Extracting semantic orientation as a function of adjective relevance. Proceedings of the 20th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 337-346). Gold Coast, Australia.

Page 54 of 58

Vorvilas, George, Thanassis Karalis & Konstantinos Ravanis. 2011. Designing learning objects: A genre- based approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education 10(2). 114-126. Wahlster, Wolfgang, Elisabeth André, Wolfgang Finkler, Hans-Jürgen Profitlich & Thomas Rist. 1993. Plan-based integration of natural language and graphics generation. Artificial Intelligence 63(387- 427). Wahlster, W., E. Andre, W. Graf & T. Rist. 1991. Knowledge-Based Media Coordination in Intelligent User Interfaces. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 549. 2-17. Wahlster, Wolfgang, Elisabeth André, Winifred Graf & Thomas Rist. 1991. Designing illustrated texts: How language production is influenced by graphics generation. Proceedings of 5th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'91) (pp. 8-14). Berlin, Germany. Walker, Marilyn & Owen Rambow. 1994. The role of cognitive modelling in achieving communicative intentions. Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 7) (pp. 171-180). Kennebunkport, Maine. Walton, D. & C. A. Reed. 2005. Argumentation schemes and enthymemes. Synthese 145(3). 339-370. Wang, Jenq-Haur & Hung-Chi Chang. 2014. Exploiting near-duplicate relations in organizing news archives. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. in press. Wang, Yuan & Minghe Guo. 2014. A short analysis of discourse coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5(2). 460-465. Webber, Bonnie. 2004. D-LTAG: extending lexicalized TAG to discourse. Cognitive Science 28(5). 751- 779. Webber, Bonnie. 2012. Review of Discourse Processing, by Manfred Stede. Computational Linguistics 38(4). 917-919. Webber, Bonnie, Aravind K Joshi, Eleni Miltsakaki, Rashmi Prasad, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee & Katherine Forbes. 2005. A short introduction to the Penn Discourse TreeBank. Copenhagen Working Papers in Language and Speech Processing. Webber, Bonnie, Alistair Knott, Matthew Stone & Aravind K. Joshi. 1999. Discourse relations: A structural and presuppositional account using lexicalised TAG. Proceedings of 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 41-48). College Park, Maryland. Wheatley, J. 1996. Flowchart representations of genre in professional communication. Javnost-the Public 3(4). 27-38. Wiebe, Janyce. 1993. Issues in linguistic segmentation. Proceedings of ACL SIG Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 148-151). Columbus, Ohio. Wiebe, Janyce, Graeme Hirst & D. Horton. 1996. Language use in context. Communications of the ACM 39(1). 102-111. Wiebe, Janyce, T. P. O'Hara, T. Ohrstrom-Sandgren & K. J. McKeever. 1998. An empirical approach to temporal reference resolution. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 9. 247-293.

Page 55 of 58

Williams, Sandra & Richard Power. 2008. Deriving rhetorical complexity data from the RST-DT corpus. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (pp. 2720-2724). Marrakech, Morocco. Williams, Sandra & Ehud Reiter. 2003. A corpus analysis of discourse relations for natural language generation. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 899-908). Lancaster, UK. Williamson, Jeanine Mary. 2000. The Vocabulary and Rhetorical Structures in Literary Studies Articles about Molly Bloom: A Description, and Applications for Information Science. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel HillThesis Type. Winther-Nielsen, Nicolai. 2012. Stones on display in Joshua 6: The Linguistic Tree Constructor as a "PLOT" tool. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 12. Wolf, Florian. 2004. Coherence in Natural Language: Data Structures and Applications. Cambridge, MA: MITThesis Type. Wolf, Florian & Edward Gibson. 2004. Paragraph-, word-, and coherence-based approaches to sentence ranking: A comparison of algorithm and human performance. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Barcelona, Spain. Wolf, Florian & Edward Gibson. 2004. Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based analysis. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). Geneva, Switzerland. Wolf, Florian & Edward Gibson. 2004. A response to Marcu (2003). Discourse structure: trees or graphs? Unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Wolf, Florian & Edward Gibson. 2005. Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based analysis. Computational Linguistics 31(2). 249-287. Wolf, Florian & Edward Gibson. 2006. Coherence in Natural Language: Data Structures and Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Wolf, Florian, Edward Gibson & Timothy Desmet. 2004. Coherence and pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 19(6). 665-675. Wolf, Florian, Edward Gibson, Amy Fisher & Meredith Knight. 2003. A procedure for collecting a database of texts annotated with coherence relations. Unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Wolf, Florian, Edward Gibson, Amy Fisher & Meredith Knight. 2005. Discourse GraphBank, LDC2005T08 [Corpus]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. Wong, Cecilia S. M. 2004. Automatic Text Analysis using Rhetorical Structure Theory with application for information search and retrieval. Hong Kong: City University of Hong KongThesis Type. Wong, Cecilia S. M. & Jonathan J. Webster. 2001. Linguistic description and exploration using RDF (Resource Description Framework). 2001 Joint International Conference of the Association for Computers and the Humanities and the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing. New York. Xiao, Lu. 2014. Effects of rationale awareness in online ideation crowdsourcing tasks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. in press.

Page 56 of 58

Yahiaoui, Leila, Yannick Prié, Zizette Boufaida & Pierre-Antoine Champin. 2011. Redocumenting computer-mediated activity from its traces: A model-based approach for narrative construction. Journal of Digital Information 12(3). Yan, Hengbin. 2013. Annotation of clausal information for semantic retrieval. Proceedings of ESAIR, 6th International Workshop on Exploiting Semantic Annotations in Information Retrieval (pp. 57-60). San Francisco, CA. Yang, Xiaohong, Lijing Chen & Yufang Yang. 2013. The effect of discourse structure on depth of semantic integration in reading. Memory and Cognition. in press. Yang, Xiaohong & Yufang Yang. 2012. Prosodic realization of rhetorical structure in Chinese discourse. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 20(4). 1196-1206. Ye, S., T. S. Chua, M. Y. Kan & L. Qiu. 2007. Document concept lattice for text understanding and summarization. Information Processing and Management 43(6). 1643-1662. Yetim, F. 1994. Transparency of Knowledge-Based Systems - State-of-the-Art and Trends in Research in the Field of Explanation Components. Nachrichten Fur Dokumentation 45(5). 291-297. Yondem, M. T. & G. Ucoluk. 2003. A realistic success criterion for discourse segmentation. In Computer and Information Sciences - Iscis 2003 (Vol. 2869, pp. 592-600). You, G. N. & R. Rada. 1994. A Systematic-Approach to Outline Manipulation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 41(3). 283-308. Young, R Michael & Johanna D Moore. 1994. Does discourse planning require a special-purpose planner? Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Planning for Inter-Agent Communication. Seattle, Washington. Yue, Ming & Zhiwei Feng. 2005. Findings in a preliminary study on the rhetorical structure of Chinese TV news reports. Paper presented at the First Computational Systemic Functional Grammar Conference, Sydney, Australia. Yue, Ming & Haitao Liu. 2011. Probability distribution of discourse relations based on a Chinese RST- annotated corpus. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 18(2). 107-121. Yung, Frances, Kevin Duh & Yuji Matsumoto. 2014. Towards the design of cross-lingual discourse annotation in Chinese-English bitext. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Speech Processing Society. Sapporo, Japan. Yunus, Melor Md & Siti Nor Fatimah Haris. 2014. The use of discourse markers among Form Four SLL students in essay writing. International Education Studies 7(2). 54-63. Zetie, Kendrik P. 1996. The Strange Case of the Bumble Bee Which Flew, 2004, from http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/~ben/zetie1.htm Zhang, Zhu, Sasha Blair-Goldensohn & Dragomir Radev. 2002. Towards CST-enhanced summarization. Proceedings of AAAI 2002. Edmonton, Alberta. Zhang, Zhu & Dragomir Radev. 2005. Combining labeled and unlabeled data for learning cross- document structural relationships. In Natural Language Processing - Ijcnlp 2004 (Vol. 3248, pp. 32- 41).

Page 57 of 58

Zhou, Lanjun, Binyang Li, Wei Gao, Zhongyu Wei & Kam-Fai Wong. 2011. Unsupervised discovery of discourse relations for eliminating intra-sentence polarity ambiguities. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 162-171). Edinburgh, UK. Zidraşco, Tatiana, Victoria Bobicev, Shun Shiramatsu, Tadachika Ozono & Toramatsu Shintani. 2011. Agreement: How to reach it? defining language features leading to agreement in dialogue. Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing 2011 (pp. 781-786). Hissar, Bulgaria. Zidrasco, Tatiana, Shun Shiramatsu, Jun Takasaki, Tadachika Ozono & Toramatsu Shintani. 2010. Building and analyzing corpus to investigate appropriateness of argumentative discourse structure for facilitating consensus. In Nicolás García-Pedrajas, Francisco Herrera, Colin Fyfe, José Manuel Benítez & Moonis Ali (eds.), Trends in Applied Intelligent Systems (Vol. 6097 LNAI, pp. 575-584). Zock, Michael & Debela Tesfaye. 2013. Automatic sentence clustering to help authors to structure their thoughts. Proceedings of NLPCS 2013, 10th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science (pp. 35-49). Marseille, France. Zou, Hongjian & Erhong Yang. 2007. Event counts as elementary unit in discourse annotation. Recent Advance of Chinese Computing Technologies. 453-458. Zufferey, Sandrine. 2013. Givenness, procedural meaning and connectives: The case of French puisque. Journal of Pragmatics. in press. Zukerman, Ingrid & Richard McConachy. 1993. An optimizing method for structuring inferentially linked discourse. Proceedings of 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-93) (pp. 202-207). Washington, DC. Zukerman, Ingrid & Richard McConachy. 1995. Generating discourse across several user models: Maximizing belief while avoiding boredom and overload. Proceedings of 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAL'95) (pp. 1251-1257). Montréal, Canada. Zukerman, Ingrid & Richard McConachy. 2001. Wishful: A discourse planning system that considers a user's inferences. Computational Intelligence 17(1). 1-61.

Page 58 of 58