RST Bibliography from the RST Web Site ( Last

RST Bibliography from the RST Web Site ( Last

RST Bibliography from the RST web site (http://www.sfu.ca/rst) Last updated: April 3, 2014 Abelen, Eric, Gisela Redeker & Sandra A. Thompson. 1993. The rhetorical structure of US-American and Dutch fund-raising letters. Text 13(3). 323-350. Abrahamson, Jennie A. & Victoria Rubin. 2012. Discourse structure differences in lay and professional health communication. Journal of Documentation 68(6). 826-851. Afantenos, Stergos D. 2007. Some reflections on the task of content determination in the context of multi-document summarization of evolving events. In Galia Angelova, Kalina Bontcheva, Ruslan Mitkov, Nicolas Nicolov & Nikolai Nikolov (eds.), Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2007) (pp. 12-16). Borovets, Bulgaria: INCOMA. Afantenos, Stergos D., Pascal Denis, Philippe Muller & Laurence Danlos. 2010, 3578-3584. Learning recursive segments for discourse parsing. International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Malta. Afantenos, Stergos D., Irene Doura, Eleni Kapellou & Vangelis Karkaletsis. 2004. Exploiting cross- document relations for multi-document evolving summarization. In G. A Vouros & T. Panayiotopoulos (eds.), Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of 3rd Hellenic Conference on AI, SETN 2004 (pp. 410-419). Berlin: Springer. Afantenos, Stergos D. & Nicolas Hernandez. 2009. What's in a message? Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition (pp. 18-25). Athens, Greece. Afantenos, Stergos D., Vangelis Karkaletsis & Panagiotis Stamatopoulos. 2005. Summarization from medical documents: a survey. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 33(2). 157-177. Afantenos, Stergos D., Vangelis Karkaletsis, Panagiotis Stamatopoulos & Constantin Halatsis. 2008. Using synchronic and diachronic relations for summarizing multiple documents describing evolving events. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 30(3). 183-226. Ahmed, Nabeel, Sharifulah Khan, Khalid Latif & Asad Masood. 2008. Extracting semantic annotations and their correlation with document components. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET) (pp. 32-37). Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Aker, Ahmet. 2014. Entity Type Modeling for Multi-Document Summarization: Generating Descriptive Summaries of Geo-Located Entities. University of SheffieldThesis Type. Alexandropoulos, George. 2013. Stylistic approach of Julian the Emperor and Gregory Nazianzean. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 6. 1-13. Allen, R. B., Y. J. Wu & J. Luo. 2005. Interactive causal schematics for qualitative scientific explanations. In Digital Libraries: Implementing Strategies and Sharing Experiences, Proceedings (Vol. 3815, pp. 411-415). Alonso i Alemany, Laura & Maria Fuentes Fort. 2003. Integrating cohesion and coherence for automatic summarization. Proceedings of EACL'03 Student Research Workshop (pp. 1-8). Budapest, Hungary. Page 1 of 58 Altshuler, Daniel. 2013. Discourse transparency and the meaning of temporal locating adverbs. Natural Language Semantics. in press. Aluíso, Sandra M., Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo & MS Duran. 2014. New corpora for "new" challenges in Portuguese processing. In Tony Berber Sardinha & Telma de Lurdes São Bento Ferreira (eds.), Working with Portuguese Corpora. London: Bloomsbury. Alves, Fabio & José Luiz Gonçalves. 2013. Investigating the conceptual-procedural distinction in the translation process. Target - International Journal of Translation Studies 25(1). 107-124. André, Elisabeth & Thomas Rist. 1996. Coping with temporal constraints in multimedia presentation planning. Proceedings of Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 142-147). Portland, Oregon. Andriessen, Jerry, Koenraad de Smedt & Michael Zock. 1996. Discourse Planning: Experimental and modeling approaches. In Ton Dijkstra & Koenraad de Smedt (eds.), Computational Psycholinguistics: Symbolic and Network Models of Language Processing (pp. 247-278). London: Taylor and Francis. Androutsopoulos, Ion, Gerasimos Lampouras & Dimitrios Galanis. 2013. Generating natural language descriptions from OWL ontologies: The NaturalOWL System. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 48. 671-715. Androutsopoulos, I., D. Spiliotopoulos, K. Stamatakis, A. Dimitromanolaki, V. Karkaletsis & C. D. Spyropoulos. 2002. Symbolic authoring for multilingual natural language generation. In Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2308, pp. 131-142). Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2001. A estrutura retorica de textos orais e de textos escritos (Rhetorical structure of oral and written texts). Acta Scientiarum 23(1). 19-25. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2004. Estrutura retórica e articulação de orações em narrativas orais e em narrativas escritas do português (Rhetorical structure and clause combining in oral narratives and written narratives in Brazilian Portuguese). Araraquara, Brazil: UNESPThesis Type. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2011. Expression of purpose rhetorical relation in formal speeches and oral interviews. Acta Scientiarum 9(3). 206-215. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2012. Expression of cause, evidence, justify and motivation rhetorical relations by causal hypotactic clauses in Brazilian Portuguese. Acta Scientiarum 34(2). 253-268. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. 2013. A RST e os estudos da língua falada: Uma investigação em elocuções do português brasileiro. Proceedings of the IV Workshop on RST and Text Studies (pp. 20-29). Fortaleza, Brazil. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato & C. Takahashi. 2010. Atuação da relação retórica de elaboração na macroestrutura e na microestrutura de elocuções formais (Performance of elaboration rhetorical relation in macrostructure and microstructure of formal elocutions). Calidoscópio 8(3). 174-180. Arens, Yigal. 1992. Multimedia Presentation Planning as an Extension of Text Planning. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 587. 278-280. Arens, Yigal & Eduard Hovy. 1995. The Design of a Model-Based Multimedia Interaction Manager. Artificial Intelligence Review 9(2-3). 167-188. Page 2 of 58 Argamon, Shlomo, Jeff Dodick & Paul Chase. 2008. Language use reflects scientific methodology: A corpus-based study of peer-reviewed journal articles. Scientometrics 75(2). 203-238. Asher, Nicholas, Farah Benamara & Yvette Yannick Mathieu. 2009. Appraisal of opinion expressions in discourse. Linguisticae Investigationes 32(2). 279-292. Asher, Nicholas, Laurent Prévot & Laure Vieu. 2007. Setting the background in discourse. Discours 1. [Online], Put online on 03 April 2008. URL : http://discours.revues.org//index2301.html. Consulted on 2008 May 2008. Azar, Moshe. 1999. Argumentative text as rhetorical structure: An application of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Argumentation 13(1). 97-144. Babaii, Esmat. 2007. Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. Discourse and Society 18(2). 223-237. Baker, Michael, Françoise Détienne & Jean-Marie Burkhardt. 2013. Quality of collaboration in design: Articulating multiple dimensions and viewpoints. 1st Interdisciplinary Innovation Conference. Paris, France. Baldridge, Jason, Nicholas Asher & Julie Hunter. 2007. Annotation for and robust parsing of discourse structure on unrestricted texts. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft(26). 213-239. Ballard, D. Lee , Robert J. Conrad & Robert E. Longacre. 1971. Interclausal relations. Foundations of Language 7(1). 70-118. Ballard, D. Lee, Robert J. Conrad & Robert E. Longacre. 1971. More on the Deep and Surface Grammar of Interclausal Relations. Santa Ana, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Banik, Eva & Alan Lee. 2008. A study of parentheticals in discousre corpora: Implications for NLG systems. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08) (pp. 2668-2675). Marrakech, Morocco. Bärenfänger, Maja, Mirco Hilbert, Henning Lobin, Harald Lüngen & Csilla Puskás. 2006. Cues and constraints for the relational discourse analysis of complex text types: The role of logical and generic document structure. In Candace L Sidner, John Harpur, Anton Benz & Peter Kühnlein (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse (pp. 27-34). Maynooth, Ireland. Bärenfänger, Maja, Henning Lobin, Harald Lüngen & Mirco Hilbert. 2006. Using OWL ontologies in discourse parsing. Proceedings of the Workshop of Ontologies in Text Technology. Osnabrück, Germany. Barzilay, Regina & Mirella Lapata. 2005. Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 141-148). Ann Arbor, MI. Barzilay, Regina & Mirella Lapata. 2008. Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Computational Linguistics 34(1-34). Bateman, John. 1990. Finding translation equivalents: An application of grammatical metaphor. Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'90) (Vol. 2, pp. 13-18). Helsinki, Finland. Page 3 of 58 Bateman, John. 2008. Basic techniques and problems in multimodal analysis. Retrieved June 22, 2012, from http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/anglistik/langpro/webspace/jb/repository/talks/session- statics.pdf Bateman, John. 2009. Discourse across semiotic modes. In Jan Renkema (ed.), Discourse, of course (pp. 55-66). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Bateman, John & Judy Delin. 2005. Rhetorical structure theory. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 589-596). Oxford: Elsevier. Bateman, John, Judy Delin & Patrick Allen. 2000. Constraints on layout in multimodal document

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    58 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us