DOCSLIB.ORG

NATO's Military Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NATO's Military Committee The International Military Staff (IMS) Six functional areas The IMS supports the Military Committee, with about The Military Committee oversees of the IMS 400 dedicated military and civilian personnel working several operations and missions in an international capacity for the common interest including the: Plans and Policy of the Alliance, rather than on behalf of their country Responsible for strategic level plans of origin. Under the direction of the Director, Dutch ➤ International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan and policies, and defence/force Lt.-Gen. Jo Godderij, the staff prepare assessments, (ISAF). NATO now is operating throughout Afghanistan with about 43,000 military personnel there under planning, including working with evaluations and reports on all issues that form the nations to determine national military its command. ISAF has responsibility for, among basis of discussion and decisions in the MC. NATO’s Military levels of ambition regarding force other things, the provision of security, Provincial goals and contributions to NATO. Reconstruction Teams, and training the Afghan National The IMS is also responsible for planning, assessing Army. Operations and recommending policy on military matters Committee Closely tracks current operations, for consideration by the Military Committee, ➤ Kosovo Force (KFOR). Since June 1999 NATO has led Operation Active Endeavour is NATO’s maritime a peacekeeping operation in Kosovo. Initially composed surveillance and escort operation in the fight against staffs operational planning, follows and for ensuring their policies and decisions are terrorism. Based in the Mediterranean Sea, the force, of 50,000 following the March 1999 air campaign, the NATO exercises and training, and implemented as directed. This staff is the essential which is provided by several nations, including for force now numbers about 16,000. focused on operations, responsible for issues involving NATO link between the decision-making bodies of the a time by Russia and Ukraine, has hailed more than air defence. 90,000 vessels. Alliance, the two Strategic Commanders, national ➤ Operation ACTIVE ENDEAVOUR (OAE), the Alliance’s only military delegations from NATO and Partner current Article 5 mission, with almost 700 personnel capabilities, and cooperation Cooperation and Regional Security countries working in Brussels, and the civilian conducting naval patrols, hailings and, boardings in the Main military contact with the Mediterranean Sea to counter terrorist activity. 23 Partners in the Euro-Atlantic International Staff that support the Secretary General and the North Atlantic Council. Partnership Council (EAPC), the ➤ Training Mission - Iraq (NTM-I) with more than 100 NATO-Russia Council (NRC), the NATO- personnel assisting in the training of security forces Ukraine Commission (NUC), the 7 and the coordination of training and equipment offers. nations in the Mediterranean Dialogue (MD), the 4 of the Istanbul Cooperation ➤ NATO also provides logistical support to the African Initiative (ICI), and with other non- Union Mission (AMISOM) member, non-Partner countries with whom NATO has relations or contact. ➤ More than 100 NATO military personnel in Sarajevo, Skopje, Tirana and Belgrade also assist with defence Logistics and Resources and security reform. All matters concerning logistics, 1206-08 NATO PRINTING & GRAPHICS STUDIO 1206-08 NATO armaments, research and development, medical, civil emergency (ISAF Photo) planning, and management of Alliance Zabul PRT personnel and 101st Airborne Division soldiers military financial resources and speak with village elders from Bowlan Kalay and prepare to personnel. hand out humanitarian aid supplies, April 2008. Intelligence International Military Staff Provides strategic intelligence support, including gathering, assessing and distributing intelligence received from member countries and NATO commands. NATO Consultation, Command and Control Gives advice on communications For more information contact: and information systems, standards, the Public Information Office, International Military Staff, NATO HQ, 1110 Brussels - Belgium products, and analysis. Afghan children from the village of Sayad Pacha in e-mail : [email protected] southern Afghanistan, use a water pump funded by the military’s civil-military cooperation section. www.nato.int Italian Admiral The Military Committee (MC) Giampaolo Di Paola, How military decisions are arrived at in NATO current chairman of NATO’s highest military authority is composed of the chiefs of the Military Committee, Six steps to agreed military advice defence of all 26 member countries. They meet at least three times is the most senior North Atlantic Council authority of the When NATO political authorities are considering a year as a group. On a day-to-day basis, their work is carried out Alliance. Defence Planning Committee military action, such as the ISAF operation in by permanent military representatives, mainly of three-star rank, at Nominated by NATO’s Nuclear Planning Group Afghanistan, a critical part of the information NATO HQ in Brussels. They meet one to four times a week in formal Chiefs of Defence, he [Secretary General] chairs all the meetings needed to make informed decisions that all and informal sessions to discuss, deliberate and act on matters of of the Committee and nations can agree to, comes from its military takes political decisions and gives political military importance, working in the best interests of the Alliance, at acts in an international authorities. The North Atlantic Council receives guidance the same time representing national perspectives and positions. capacity. NATO’s chiefs of regular briefings and reports, and at each key 6 defence meet at least stage the Military Committee is called on to give The MC provides the North Atlantic Council, NATO’s highest political three times a year, advice, and to provide direction to NATO Military and on a day-to-day Authorities. 1 authority, with consensus-based military advice - that is, advice basis work through agreed to by all chiefs of defence. It works closely with the two permanent military Political Committees Military Committee Step 1. The North Atlantic Council tasks the Strategic Commanders1 to bring plans, issues and recommendations representatives in [Chairman] NATO HQ in Brussels. forward for political consideration. In turn, it gives clear military Military Committee to produce military advice that provide political advice and policy can be agreed by all 26 NATO chiefs of defence. direction to the Strategic Commanders based on MC and North guidance provides consensus-based military advice and translates political Atlantic Council decisions. Step 2. The International Military Staff, in support guidance into military direction of the Military Committee, translates the political 3 The MC represents a tremendous amount of specialised knowledge guidance into military direction and tasks one or and experience that informs Alliance-wide military policies, strategies both Strategic Commands for their best military and plans, and is a key part of the NATO decision-making process. advice on how to organise and conduct what has been asked for, including an assessment of the Working Groups 1 The overall planning and direction for all NATO operations rests with the Supreme Allied personnel and financial resources required. Commander Europe (SACEUR), who works from Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) headquarters in Mons, Belgium. Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT), national military delegations working from Norfolk, U.S., is responsible for enhancing NATO military capabilities, developing Step 3. The input from the Strategic work with IMS to troubleshoot concepts, policies, and joint NATO training. International Staff International Command(s) is provided to the Military Committee issues Military Staff 4 5 (i.e. to the nations) for consideration, usually with the executive agent an initial assessment by the International Military supporting Council and its the executive agent of Staff. committees the MC The Committee’s principal role is to provide direction and The Role of the Chairman advice on military policy and strategy. It is responsible for recommending to NATO’s political authorities those measures Step 4. The Military Representatives provide political-military coordination considered necessary for the common defence of the NATO their response and advice from a national The Chairman of the Military Committee is elected by the NATO area and for the implementation of decisions regarding standpoint. 26 views need to converge into chiefs of defence, normally for a three-year term. He represents NATO’s operations and missions. consensus advice that can be passed to the North their consensus-based views as the principal military adviser to the Atlantic Council. 2 Secretary General, the North Atlantic Council and other senior NATO Strategic Commanders organisations. He guides the Committee’s agenda and deliberations, Step 5. Consensus is rarely immediately [SACEUR & SACT] listening to views and working to reconcile divergent national achieved on complex undertakings, and working groups meet regularly to troubleshoot and work positions or policy differences to fashion advice that all can agree to. give their best military advice to Each nation has an equal voice in the discussion and decisions, as through issues. Staff from national military the MC and the NAC delegations work under an IMS chairman and with all
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2009-10 KFOR Chronicle:Layout 1.Qxd
    10 years ago, I was tasked to train and prepare the first Austrian contingent for KFOR. Although this is my first tour in Kosovo, I was quite impressed with the development of the mission and the country during the past 10 years. The development was successful because a large number of soldiers served in a very professional way to include the numerous organizations working in KOSOVO and the people living here. “We are truly “MOVING FORWARD”. Nevertheless, most of us will agree that many issues remain to be solved and more time is needed to heal the wounds of the conflict. As a professional soldier, I always look forward, and from this prospective the question arise: “Can we do our mission even with less people and means?” We will soon enter the new phase called “Deterrent Presence”. According to our success the number of forces will shrink. In this respect, I think we also have to look for new ways of seeing opportunities and not only challenges. According to the outlay of mission, the Multinational Battle Groups (MNBG) will remain self-sustaining in many ways. The logistic footprint will still be quite impressive. In the months to come we will have to prove that every soldier is mission necessary. Intelligence and logistic could be fields of extended cooperation between nations and MNBG in the future. A Joint Logistic Support Group (JLSG) will take over some of the responsibilities each nation had to sustain on their own so far. To implement this new structure in KFOR, it will not be an easy process, but the concept of JLSG will be tested in reality in theater.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy's Atlanticism Between Foreign and Internal
    UNISCI Discussion Papers, Nº 25 (January / Enero 2011) ISSN 1696-2206 ITALY’S ATLANTICISM BETWEEN FOREIGN AND INTERNAL POLITICS Massimo de Leonardis 1 Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Abstract: In spite of being a defeated country in the Second World War, Italy was a founding member of the Atlantic Alliance, because the USA highly valued her strategic importance and wished to assure her political stability. After 1955, Italy tried to advocate the Alliance’s role in the Near East and in Mediterranean Africa. The Suez crisis offered Italy the opportunity to forge closer ties with Washington at the same time appearing progressive and friendly to the Arabs in the Mediterranean, where she tried to be a protagonist vis a vis the so called neo- Atlanticism. This link with Washington was also instrumental to neutralize General De Gaulle’s ambitions of an Anglo-French-American directorate. The main issues of Italy’s Atlantic policy in the first years of “centre-left” coalitions, between 1962 and 1968, were the removal of the Jupiter missiles from Italy as a result of the Cuban missile crisis, French policy towards NATO and the EEC, Multilateral [nuclear] Force [MLF] and the revision of the Alliance’ strategy from “massive retaliation” to “flexible response”. On all these issues the Italian government was consonant with the United States. After the period of the late Sixties and Seventies when political instability, terrorism and high inflation undermined the Italian role in international relations, the decision in 1979 to accept the Euromissiles was a landmark in the history of Italian participation to NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • Delpaese E Le Forze Armate
    L’ITALIA 1945-1955 LA RICOSTRUZIONE DEL PAESE STATO MAGGIORE DELLA DIFESA UFFICIO STORICO E LE Commissione E LE FORZE ARMATE Italiana Storia Militare MINISTERO DELLA DIFESA CONGRESSOCONGRESSO DIDI STUDISTUDI STORICISTORICI INTERNAZIONALIINTERNAZIONALI CISM - Sapienza Università di Roma ROMA, 20-21 NOVEMBRE 2012 Centro Alti Studi per la Difesa (CASD) Palazzo Salviati ATTI DEL CONGRESSO PROPRIETÀ LETTERARIA tutti i diritti riservati: Vietata anche la riproduzione parziale senza autorizzazione © 2014 • Ministero della Difesa Ufficio Storico dello SMD Salita S. Nicola da Tolentino, 1/B - Roma [email protected] A cura di: Dott. Piero Crociani Dott.ssa Ada Fichera Dott. Paolo Formiconi Hanno contribuito alla realizzazione del Congresso di studi storici internazionali CISM Ten. Col. Cosimo SCHINAIA Capo Sezione Documentazione Storica e Coordinamento dell’Ufficio Storico dello SMD Ten. Col. Fabrizio RIZZI Capo Sezione Archivio Storico dell’Ufficio Storico dello SMD CF. Fabio SERRA Addetto alla Sezione Documentazione Storica e Coordinamento dell’Ufficio Storico dello SMD 1° Mar. Giuseppe TRINCHESE Capo Segreteria dell’Ufficio Storico dello SMD Mar. Ca. Francesco D’AURIA Addetto alla Sezione Archivio Storico dell’Ufficio Storico dello SMD Mar. Ca. Giovanni BOMBA Addetto alla Sezione Documentazione Storica e Coordinamento dell’Ufficio Storico dello SMD ISBN: 978-88-98185-09-2 3 Presentazione Col. Matteo PAESANO1 Italia 1945-1955 la ricostruzione del Paese el 1945 il Paese è un cumulo di macerie con una bassissima produzione industriale
    [Show full text]
  • Strike Sorties, Including 463 Conducted by US Aircraft
    The Air Force, technically in a supporting role, has been front and center. The Libya Mission By Amy McCullough, Senior Editor hen US Air Forces Af- of the continent, and the command’s to prepare for a potential contingency rica stood up in Octo- role began to change. After the leaders operation there. ber 2008, the original of Tunisia and Egypt were overthrown Planning lasted until March 17 when vision for the com- in popular revolutions, Libyan dicta- the United Nations Security Council mand centered around tor Muammar Qaddafi essentially approved a resolution authorizing the low intensity conflict scenarios, hu- declared war on his civilian population use of force to protect civilians in Wmanitarian relief missions, and training in a bid to stay in power. Officials at Libya, including a no-fly zone over and advising African partner militaries. Ramstein Air Base in Germany, where the restive North African state. The But by mid-February 2011, conflicts AFAFRICA is based, began working measure, which came five days after had erupted across much of the north closely with US and coalition countries the Arab League called on the Security 28 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2011 Council to establish a no-fly zone, called for an “immediate cease-fire and a complete end to violence and all attacks against, and abuses of, civil- ians” targeted by Qaddafi and forces loyal to him. USAF photo by SSgt. Marc LaneI. Opening Days Two days later, US and British warships based in the Mediterranean launched more than 100 long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles against Libyan air defenses—kick-starting Operation Odyssey Dawn.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA 32Nd Intl Wkshp Paris Nov 2015
    #32iws Revised 4 November 2015 Workshop Agenda Patron Mr. Jean-Yves Le Drian Minister of Defense of France Patron of the 30th, 31st and 32nd International Workshops on Global Security Theme Facing the Emerging Security Challenges: From Crimea to Cyber Security Workshop Chairman & Founder Dr. Roger Weissinger-Baylon Co-Director, Center for Strategic Decision Research Presented by Center for Strategic Decision Research (CSDR) Institut des hautes études de défense nationale (IHEDN), and within the French Prime Minister’s organization · Including the Castex Chair of Cyber Strategy Principal Sponsors French Ministry of Defense United States Department of Defense · Office of the Director of Net Assessment North Atlantic Treaty Organization · Public Diplomacy Major Sponsors Lockheed Martin · McAfee, Intel Security · MITRE Tiversa · Area SpA · FireEye Associate Sponsors Kaspersky Lab · AECOM Quantum Research International Acknowledgements to Past Patrons, Honorary General Chairmen, Host Governments, and Keynote Speakers Patrons His Excellency Jean-Yves Le Drian, Minister of Defense of France (2013, 2014, 2015) His Excellency Giorgio Napolitano, President of the Italian Republic (2012) His Excellency Gérard Longuet, Minister of Defense of France (2011) State Secretary Rüdiger Wolf, Ministry of Defense of Germany (2010) His Excellency Vecdi Gönül, Minister of Defense of Turkey (2009) His Excellency Ignazio La Russa, Minister of Defense of Italy (2008) His Excellency Hervé Morin, Minister of Defense of France (2007) His Excellency Franz Josef Jung, MdB, Minister of Defense of Germany (2006) Her Excellency Michèle Alliot-Marie, Minister of Defense of France (2005, 2007) His Excellency Aleksander Kwasniewski, President of Poland (1996–98, 2000, 2002) His Excellency Václav Havel, President of the Czech Republic (1996, 1997) His Excellency Peter Struck, MdB, Minister of Defense of Germany (2004) His Excellency Rudolf Scharping, Minister of Defense of Germany (2000, 2002) His Excellency Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive NATO
    Comprehensive NATO GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE Supporting Paper The GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative, led by General (Retd) John R. Allen, is GLOBSEC’s foremost contribution to debates about the future of the Alliance. Given the substantial changes within the global security environment, GLOBSEC has undertaken a year-long project, following its annual Spring conference and the July NATO Summit in Warsaw, to explore challenges faced by the Alliance in adapting to a very different strategic environment than that of any time since the end of the Cold War. The Initiative envisages a series of policy papers which will address the nature of NATO adaptation and the challenges it must overcome if it is to remain a viable and credible alliance for the peace and stability in the transatlantic area. The policy papers published within the GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative are authored by the Initiative’s Steering Committee members: General (Retd) John R. Allen, Admiral (Retd) Giampaolo di Paola, General (Retd) Wolf Langheld, Professor Julian Lindley-French, Ambassador Tomáš Valášek, Ambassador Alexander Vershbow and other acclaimed authorities from the field of global security and strategy. The aim of the involvement of such a wide array of experts is to reinforce the unique partnership between policy-makers, military leaders and leading academics and commentators. These policy papers will prelude and result with the publication of the Initiative’s Steering Committee Recommendation Two Pager and the Main Report to be launched in October 2017. The Interim Report will be released during the GLOBSEC 2017 Bratislava Forum. These outputs will be augmented by shorter policy papers (on cybersecurity, A2/AD capability, intelligence, and threats emanating from the South) prepared by the GLOBSEC Policy Institute between January and October 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    NATO – Wikipedia Seite 1 von 24 NATO Koordinaten: 50° 52′ 34″ N, 4° 25′ 19″ O aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie Die NATO (englisch North Atlantic Treaty Organization North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) „Organisation des Nordatlantikvertrags“ bzw. Organisation du traité de l’Atlantique Nord (OTAN) Nordatlantikpakt-Organisation; im Deutschen häufig als Atlantisches Bündnis bezeichnet) oder OTAN (französisch Organisation du Traité de l’Atlantique Nord) ist eine Internationale Organisation, die den Nordatlantikvertrag, ein militärisches Bündnis von 28 europäischen und nordamerikanischen Staaten, umsetzt.[4] Das NATO- Hauptquartier beherbergt mit dem Nordatlantikrat das Hauptorgan der NATO; diese Institution hat seit 1967 ihren Sitz in Brüssel. Nach der Unterzeichnung des Nordatlantikpakts am 4. April 1949 – zunächst auf 20 Jahre Flagge der NATO – war das Hauptquartier zunächst von 1949 bis April 1952 in Washington, D.C., anschließend war der Sitz vom 16. April 1952 bis 1967 in Paris eingerichtet worden.[5] Inhaltsverzeichnis ◾ 1 Geschichte und Entwicklung ◾ 1.1 Vorgeschichte ◾ 1.2 Entwicklung von 1949 bis 1984 ◾ 1.2.1 Zwei-Pfeiler-Doktrin ◾ 1.3 Entwicklung von 1985 bis 1990 ◾ 1.4 Entwicklung von 1991 bis 1999 ◾ 1.5 Entwicklung seit 2000 ◾ 1.5.1 Terroranschläge in den USA am 11. September 2001 ◾ 1.5.2 ISAF-Einsatz in Afghanistan ◾ 1.5.3 Irak-Krise Generalsekretär Jens Stoltenberg [1][2] ◾ 1.5.4 Libyen (seit 2014) ◾ 1.5.5 Türkei SACEUR (Supreme US-General Philip M. ◾ 1.6 Krisen-Reaktionstruppe der NATO Allied Commander Breedlove (seit 13. Mai 2013) Europe) ◾ 1.7 NATO-Raketenabwehrprogramm SACT (Supreme Allied General (FRA) Jean-Paul ◾ 2 Auftrag Commander Paloméros (seit September ◾ 2.1 Rechtsgrundlage Transformation) 2012) ◾ 2.2 Aufgaben und Ziele Gründung 4.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Strategic Concept
    Istituto Affari Internazionali DOCUMENTI IAI 10 | 23 – November 2010 NATO’s Strategic Concept: Back to the Future Interview with Giampaolo Di Paola by Alessandro Marrone Abstract The NATO reflection on the new Strategic Concept is moving to its conclusion, and there are some steps forward about important issues such as missile defence and cyber security. The NATO Military Committee Chairman, Admiral Giampaolo Di Paola, comments on that in this interview focused on the upcoming Lisbon Summit where the new Strategic Concept will be approved. Keywords : NATO’s military doctrine / Missile defence / Cyber-security / Energy supply security / Afghanistan / US foreign policy / Russia / Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) / European Union / NATO-EU cooperation © 2010 IAI Documenti IAI 1023 NATO’s Strategic Concept: Back to the Future NATO’s Strategic Concept: Back to the Future Interview with Giampaolo Di Paola by Alessandro Marrone ∗ The NATO reflection on the new Strategic Concept is moving to its conclusion, and there are some steps forward about important issues such as missile defence and cyber security. The NATO Military Committee Chairman, Admiral Giampaolo Di Paola, comments on that in this interview focused on the upcoming Lisbon Summit where the new Strategic Concept will be approved. NATO’s Defence and Foreign Affairs Ministers in their meeting last October discussed, among other things, the draft of the new Strategic Concept. What was said about it? During the Ministerial meeting Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen presented his draft of the Strategic Concept, in order to have a validation by the Ministers that his work is going in the right direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographies of the Speakers.Pdf
    Biographies of the speakers 1. Elana Wilson Rowe Elana Wilson Rowe holds a PhD (2006) in Geography from the University of Cambridge. She is a research professor at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and an adjunct professor in energy politics at the High North Centre for Business and Governance at Nord University (Bodø, Norway). Wilson Rowe’s research areas include Arctic governance, Russia’s Arctic and foreign policymaking, and ocean governance. She is the author of Russian Climate Politics: When Science Meets Policy (Palgrave, 2013) and Arctic Governance: Power in cross-border relations (University of Manchester, 2018). She was a member of Norway’s committee establishing research priorities for the UN Ocean Decade and is currently leading a five-year research project funded by the European Research Council comparing the politics of the Arctic, Amazon Basin and the Caspian Sea (‘The Lorax Project’, #loraxprojectERC). 2. Nils Wang Rear Admiral Nils Wang is one of Denmark’s leading analysts on issues related to geo-politics, Arctic security and the relationship between Denmark and Greenland. Before he became Director of Naval Team Denmark he was Commandant of the Danish Defence College and he was Head of the Royal Danish Navy from 2005 to 2010. Rear Admiral Nils Wang´s more than ten years of active sea duty in the Danish Navy includes 5 years in Arctic Waters around Greenland. In 2015 Rear Admiral Nils Wang was appointed to be part of the Taksøe-Jensen Advisory Group, assisting the development of a new set of priorities for Denmark´s future foreign and defence policies and he is presently part of an Government Expert Panel attached to a Defence related National Security Analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2018 Full Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 71 Article 1 Number 3 Summer 2018 2018 Summer 2018 Full Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2018) "Summer 2018 Full Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 71 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol71/iss3/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Summer 2018 Full Issue Summer 2018 Volume 71, Number 3 Summer 2018 Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2018 1 Naval War College Review, Vol. 71 [2018], No. 3, Art. 1 Cover The Navy’s unmanned X-47B flies near the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roo- sevelt (CVN 71) in the Atlantic Ocean in August 2014. The aircraft completed a series of tests demonstrating its ability to operate safely and seamlessly with manned aircraft. In “Lifting the Fog of Targeting: ‘Autonomous Weapons’ and Human Control through the Lens of Military Targeting,” Merel A. C. Ekelhof addresses the current context of increas- ingly autonomous weapons, making the case that military targeting practices should be the core of any analysis that seeks a better understanding of the concept of meaningful human control.
    [Show full text]
  • Globsec Nato Adaptation Initiative
    GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE ONE ALLIANCE The Future Tasks of the Adapted Alliance www.globsec.org 2 GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE ONE ALLIANCE The Future Tasks of the Adapted Alliance PRESENTATION FOLDER: COLLECTION OF PAPERS ONE ALLIANCE THE FUTURE TASKS OF THE ADAPTED ALLIANCE The GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative, led by General (Retd.) John R. Allen, is GLOBSEC’s foremost contribution to debates about the future of the Alliance. Given the substantial changes within the global security environment, GLOBSEC has undertaken a year-long project, following its annual Spring conference and the July NATO Summit in Warsaw, to explore challenges faced by the Alliance in adapting to a very different strategic environment than that of any time since the end of the Cold War. The Initiative integrates policy expertise, institutional knowledge, intellectual rigour and industrial perspectives. It ultimately seeks to provide innovative and thoughtful solutions for the leaders of the Alliance to make NATO more a resilient, responsive and efficient anchor of transatlantic stability. The policy papers published within the GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative are authored by the Initiative’s Steering Committee members: General (Retd.) John R. Allen, Admiral (Retd.) Giampaolo di Paola, General (Retd.) Wolf Langheld, Professor Julian Lindley-French, Ambassador (Retd.) Tomáš Valášek, Ambassador (Retd.) Alexander Vershbow and other acclaimed authorities from the field of global security and strategy. 4 GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE CREDITS CREDITS GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative Steering Committee General (Retd.) John R. Allen1, Professor Dr Julian Lindley-French, Admiral (Retd.) Giampaolo Di Paola, General (Retd.) Wolf Langheld, Ambassador (Retd.) Tomáš Valášek, Ambassador (Retd.) Alexander Vershbow Observers and Advisors General (Retd.) Knud Bartels, James Townsend, Dr Michael E.
    [Show full text]
  • After Chicago: Re-Evaluating NATO's Priorities
    After Chicago: Re-evaluating NATO’s priorities Report International conference Friday 25 May 2012 Palais d’Egmont, Brussels With the support of The views expressed in this report are personal opinions of the speakers and not necessarily those of the organisations they represent, nor of the Security & Defence Agenda, its members or partners. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted, providing that full attribution is made to the Security & Defence Agenda and to the source(s) in question, and provided that any such reproduction, whether in full or in part, is not sold unless incorporated in other works. A Security & Defence Agenda Report Rapporteur: Jonathan Dowdall Photos: Philippe Molitor Publisher: Geert Cami Table of contents Foreword 2 Programme and speakers 4 Report 9 2012 Security Jam 18 10th Anniversary Presidents’ Dinner 28 List of participants 30 After Chicago: Re-evaluating NATO’s priorities 1 Foreword The SDA’s annual NATO conference once again gave us an opportunity to gather stakeholders from the defence and security sectors for an open and valuable discussion. This SDA conference followed hard on the heels of NATO’s Chicago summit, which made it plain that the challenges facing the Alliance remain numerous and complex, with the question marks over NATO’s post-Cold War raison d’être yet to be satisfactorily answered. Profound shifts in the geopolitical balance, in particular the economic and military rise of Asian powers is being paralleled by global financial turmoil. This report aims to provide food for thought for NATO and national leaders, for it still remains to be seen whether the alliance’s political leaders will find the courage needed to resolve the security and defence issues that confront us all.
    [Show full text]