Combined Dendrochronological and Radiocarbon Dating of Three Russian Icons from the 15Th–17Th Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Combined Dendrochronological and Radiocarbon Dating of Three Russian Icons from the 15Th–17Th Century G Model DENDRO-25341; No. of Pages 9 ARTICLE IN PRESS Dendrochronologia xxx (2015) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Dendrochronologia journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dendro Combined dendrochronological and radiocarbon dating of three Russian icons from the 15th–17th century a,∗ a b,c Vladimir Matskovsky , Andrey Dolgikh , Konstantin Voronin a Institute of Geography RAS, 119017, Staromonetniy pereulok 29, Moscow, Russia b Institute of Archaeology RAS, 117036, Dmitryɑ Ulyanovɑ st. 19, Moscow, Russia c Stolichnoe Archaeological Bureau, 119121, Iljinka st. 4, office 226, Moscow, Russia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Dendrochronology is usually the only method of precise dating of unsigned art objects made on or of Received 10 June 2015 wood. It has a long history of application in Europe, however in Russia such an approach is still at an Received in revised form 9 October 2015 infant stage, despite its cultural importance. Here we present the results of dendrochronological and Accepted 12 October 2015 radiocarbon accelerated mass spectrometry (AMS) dating of three medieval icons from the 15th–17th Available online xxx century that originate from the North of European Russia and are painted on wooden panels made from Scots pines. For each icon the wooden panels were dendrochronologically studied and five to six AMS Keywords: dates were made. Two icons were successfully dendro-dated whereas one failed to be reliably cross-dated Icons Wiggle-matching with the existing master tree-ring chronologies, but was dated by radiocarbon wiggle-matching. Wiggle- matching of radiocarbon dates is the most promising method for dating Russian icons in the absence of a Wood dating Radiocarbon dating dense dendrochronological network. However, for this case uncertainties connected with the radiocarbon Russia method have to be taken into account and further studies of these uncertainties must be undertaken by Wood painting comparing dendro-dated and radiocarbon-dated wooden works of art. Our results, moreover, showed Cultural heritage that in two cases art-historical dates were by five to ten decades older than the earliest possible time of the creation of the icons, based on dendrochronology. © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction In Russia previously only one art object has been dated dendrochronologically—it was a Dexiokratusa icon from Velikiy Dendrochronological dating is usually the only method of pre- Novgorod (Voronin et al., 2015). There are two main reasons for cisely dating unsigned art objects made on or of wood. Whereas this poor state of such research: (1) sparse dendrochronological numerous studies are dedicated to this topic in Europe (e.g., Bauch network mainly representing coniferous species (mainly pine and and Eckstein, 1970; Lavier and Lambert, 1996; Kuniholm, 2000; spruce) and (2) problems with getting permission for the analyses Wazny, 2002), there are quite few of them in Russia (here we take of art objects in museums and galleries. only the European part of the country). In Eastern Europe several The three icons—“Mother of God with the Child, Jerusalem type” works were carried out on radiocarbon dating (Kovalyukh et al., (MOG), “St. Nicholas of Myra in Lycia with scenes of his life” (NIC) 2001) and on dendrochronological dating (Krapiec˛ and Barniak, and “St. George and the Dragon miracle” (GEO) have been selected 2007) of icons painted between the 12th and 19th century. for the analysis because they are painted on coniferous panels, they Up to now, medieval Russian icons were mostly studied by represent one region—North-West (NW) of European Russia (ER), art historians and chemistry technologists, but they usually date which has a dense dendrochronological network (Fig. 1) and a con- these objects on the basis of an empirical relative chronology. This tinuous period of art development—from the early 15th to 17th chronology is based on several historically dated Russian icons. century according to attributions by art historians and chemistry Usually it is not possible to define a precise date of creation of technologists. The purposes of this study were (1) to acquire precise historically undated icons on the base of such chronologies. Time and reliable dates for the icons; (2) to compare them with previ- intervals for these dates are usually twenty to thirty years wide. ous attributions by means of an art-historical analysis and chemical analyses of pigments; and (3) to assess additional statistical mate- rial for comparison of dendrochronological and radiocarbon dates ∗ from medieval icons in the NW ER. Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (V. Matskovsky). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2015.10.002 1125-7865/© 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Please cite this article in press as: Matskovsky, V., et al., Combined dendrochronological and radiocarbon dating of three Russian icons from the 15th–17th century. Dendrochronologia (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2015.10.002 G Model DENDRO-25341; No. of Pages 9 ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 V. Matskovsky et al. / Dendrochronologia xxx (2015) xxx–xxx Fig. 1. Map of Europe (inset) and of the study region in Western Russia. Reference tree-ring chronologies of pine are marked with large blue circles (numbers correspond to the ones in Table 1). Locations of the icons are marked with squares and codes. Towns are marked with small black circles. All toponyms in the text are reflected on the map. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) 2. Materials tury, possibly made by an unknown master from Rostov Velikiy (Sayenkova, 2011). 2.1. The icon “Mother of God with the Child, Jerusalem type” (MOG) 2.3. The icon “Saint George and the Dragon miracle” (GEO) The MOG icon was painted on one wooden panel of 64 cm high, The GEO icon was painted on a wooden panel made from one 43 cm wide and 2.5 cm thick (Fig. 2). It belongs to the type of image board of 73 cm high, 54 cm wide and 3.7 cm thick (Fig. 2). The gesso of the Mother of God which was popular in the lands of Velikiy Nov- of this icon, which is the ground coat for the painting, is based on gorod in the 15th–16th century. The art historian O.V. Lelekova and chalk. According to the style of painting it was created in the Rus- the chemistry technologist M.M. Naumova (National Institute of sian North between the end of the 16th—the beginning of the 17th Renovation, Moscow, personal communication) referred this icon century. to the Velikiy Novgorod art tradition of the beginning of the 15th It is not always possible to determine the exact location where century. E.M. Sayenkova (National Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow, per- the icon has been painted. For the three icons it was only possi- sonal communication) attributed this icon to the same art tradition ble to trace them back to the locations on the map (Fig. 1): MOG and time period. and NIC were brought from Vologda and GEO from Ferapontovo, Vologda region. From additional sources it is more likely that the GEO icon was not transported before, but MOG and NIC probably were. Nevertheless the good condition of the wood reflects “north- 2.2. The icon “St. Nicholas of Myra in Lycia with scenes of his life” (NIC) ern” conditions for the residence of the icons because the icons are not damaged by wood destructive insects. The NIC icon was painted on a wooden panel consisting of two boards, which were later fixed by three additional boards on the 3. Methods back (not analyzed). These two boards were produced from one tree. The size of the icon is 78 cm high, 61 cm wide and 3.4 cm thick For dendrochronological analysis, the upper or lower edge of (Fig. 2). The icon belongs to a small group of the Russian medieval the panel was prepared with a sharp razor blade and then high- icons with a red background. This type of icons was painted in Rus- resolution macro-photographs of cross-sections of the boards were sian lands from the 13th to the 15th century. O.V. Lelekova and taken. These photographs were combined, and each tree ring was © M.M. Naumova refer this icon to the beginning of the 15th century. marked and measured in CooRecorder (Cybis, 2006) to obtain an E.M. Sayenkova also refers this icon to the first half of the 15th cen- accurate tree-ring width series. Cross-dating was performed by Please cite this article in press as: Matskovsky, V., et al., Combined dendrochronological and radiocarbon dating of three Russian icons from the 15th–17th century. Dendrochronologia (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2015.10.002 G Model DENDRO-25341; No. of Pages 9 ARTICLE IN PRESS V. Matskovsky et al. / Dendrochronologia xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 3 Table 1 Reference tree-ring width chronologies of pine. # Place Description Ref. Approx. # of samples Years AD coordinates 1 Solovki Solovki islands, White Solomina et al., 2011 65.09N 35.64E 243 1185–2009 sea. Living trees, architectural wood 2 Onega Arkhangelsk region. Chernykh and Sergeeva, 1997, 63.48N 39.14E 62 1367–1784 Architectural wood updated in the Institute of (churches) Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences (IGRAS), 2013 3 Kirillov Vologda region. Living Solomina et al., 2011; 59.86N 38.37E 282 1085–2009 trees, architectural and Karpukhin and Matskovsky, archaeological wood 2014 4 Vologda Vologda town. Karpukhin, 2009; updated in 59.22N 39.88E 215 1518–1881 Architectural wood IGRAS (2013) 5 Novgorod Novgorod town. ITRDB (russ1); Kolchin, 1963; 58.52N 31.28E 92 1102–1514 Archaeological wood Tarabardina, 2001, corrected and updated in IGRAS, 2014 6 Kostroma Kostroma town.
Recommended publications
  • Use of Classification Algorithms for the Ice Jams Forecasting Problem
    E3S Web of Conferences 163, 02008 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016302008 IV Vinogradov Conference Use of classification algorithms for the ice jams forecasting problem Natalia Semenova1*, Alexey Sazonov1,2, Inna Krylenko1,2,andNatalia Frolova1 1 Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, 119991, Moscow, Russia 2 Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, Gubkina st., 3, 119333, Moscow, Russia Abstract. In the research the prediction of occurrence of ice jam based on the K Nearest Neighbor method was considered by example of the city of Velikiy Ustyug, located at the confluence of the Sukhona and Yug Rivers. A forecast accuracy of 82% was achieved based on selected most significant hydrological and meteorological features. 1 Introduction Floods gain a lead among natural disasters both in terms of area of distribution and damage caused for Russia. Flooding can be caused by snow cover melting, a large amount of precipitation, the effects of surges, a breakthrough of a dam, etc. For northern rivers, including rivers of the European part of Russia, ice jams often cause floods. The goal of this research is developing a methodology for predicting the occurrence of ice jam based on the machine learning method. The place of confluence of the Sukhona and Yug Rivers, where the city of Velikiy Ustyug is located, was chosen as the object of study. The probability of the ice jams formation in this area is 43.5% according to statistics. Their occurrence leads to an increase of water level and flooding of residential and utility buildings. 2 Data and methods Over the past two decades, there has been a huge leap in the development of computer technology and machine learning, which has allowed the application of various machine learning algorithms to a large number of applied problems, including the prediction of flood characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Periglacial Climate and Environment in Northern Eurasia
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Quaternary Science Reviews 23 (2004) 1333–1357 The periglacial climate andenvironment in northern Eurasia during the Last Glaciation Hans W. Hubbertena,*, Andrei Andreeva, Valery I. Astakhovb, Igor Demidovc, Julian A. Dowdeswelld, Mona Henriksene, Christian Hjortf, Michael Houmark-Nielseng, Martin Jakobssonh, Svetlana Kuzminai, Eiliv Larsenj, Juha Pekka Lunkkak, AstridLys a(j, Jan Mangerude, Per Moller. f, Matti Saarnistol, Lutz Schirrmeistera, Andrei V. Sherm, Christine Siegerta, Martin J. Siegertn, John Inge Svendseno a Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Telegrafenberg A43, Potsdam D-14473, Germany b Geological Faculty, St. Petersburg University, Universitetskaya 7/9, St. Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation c Institute of Geology, Karelian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushkinskaya 11, Petrozavodsk 125610, Russian Federation d Scott Polar Research Institute and Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CBZ IER, UK e Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegt.! 41, Bergen N-5007, Norway f Quaternary Science, Department of Geology, Lund University, Geocenter II, Solvegatan. 12, Lund Sweden g Geological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, Copenhagen DK-1350, Denmark h Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, Chase Ocean Engineering Lab, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA i Paleontological Institute, RAS, Profsoyuznaya ul., 123, Moscow 117868, Russia j Geological Survey of Norway, PO Box 3006 Lade, Trondheim N-7002, Norway
    [Show full text]
  • Nepcon CB Public Summary Report V1.4 Main Audit Sokol Timber
    NEPCon Evaluation of “Sokol Timber Company” Joint-Stock Company Compliance with the SBP Framework: Public Summary Report Main (Initial) Audit www.sbp-cert.org Focusing on sustainable sourcing solutions Completed in accordance with the CB Public Summary Report Template Version 1.4 For further information on the SBP Framework and to view the full set of documentation see www.sbp-cert.org Document history Version 1.0: published 26 March 2015 Version 1.1: published 30 January 2018 Version 1.2: published 4 April 2018 Version 1.3: published 10 May 2018 Version 1.4: published 16 August 2018 © Copyright The Sustainable Biomass Program Limited 2018 NEPCon Evaluation of “Sokol Timber Company” Joint-Stock Company: Public Summary Report, Main (Initial) Audit Page ii Focusing on sustainable sourcing solutions Table of Contents 1 Overview 2 Scope of the evaluation and SBP certificate 3 Specific objective 4 SBP Standards utilised 4.1 SBP Standards utilised 4.2 SBP-endorsed Regional Risk Assessment 5 Description of Company, Supply Base and Forest Management 5.1 Description of Company 5.2 Description of Company’s Supply Base 5.3 Detailed description of Supply Base 5.4 Chain of Custody system 6 Evaluation process 6.1 Timing of evaluation activities 6.2 Description of evaluation activities 6.3 Process for consultation with stakeholders 7 Results 7.1 Main strengths and weaknesses 7.2 Rigour of Supply Base Evaluation 7.3 Compilation of data on Greenhouse Gas emissions 7.4 Competency of involved personnel 7.5 Stakeholder feedback 7.6 Preconditions 8 Review
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of High Conservation Value Areas, and Analysis of Gaps and Representativeness of the Protected Area Network in Northwest R
    34°40' 216 217 Chudtsy Efimovsky 237 59°30' 59°20' Anisimovo Loshchinka River Somino Tushemelka River 59°20' Chagoda River Golovkovo Ostnitsy Spirovo 59°10' Klimovo Padun zakaznik Smordomsky 238 Puchkino 236 Ushakovo Ignashino Rattsa zakaznik 59°0' Rattsa River N O V G O R O D R E G I O N 59°0' 58°50' °50' 58 0369 км 34°20' 34°40' 35°0' 251 35°0' 35°20' 217 218 Glubotskoye Belaya Velga 238 protected mire protected mire Podgornoye Zaborye 59°30' Duplishche protected mire Smorodinka Volkhovo zakaznik protected mire Lid River °30' 59 Klopinino Mountain Stone protected mire (Kamennaya Gora) nature monument 59°20' BABAEVO Turgosh Vnina River °20' 59 Chadogoshchensky zakaznik Seredka 239 Pervomaisky 237 Planned nature monument Chagoda CHAGODA River and Pes River shores Gorkovvskoye protected mire Klavdinsky zakaznik SAZONOVO 59°10' Vnina Zalozno Staroye Ogarevo Chagodoshcha River Bortnikovo Kabozha Pustyn 59°0' Lake Chaikino nature monument Izbouishchi Zubovo Privorot Mishino °0' Pokrovskoye 59 Dolotskoye Kishkino Makhovo Novaya Planned nature monument Remenevo Kobozha / Anishino Chernoozersky Babushkino Malakhovskoye protected mire Kobozha River Shadrino Kotovo protected Chikusovo Kobozha mire zakazhik 58°50' Malakhovskoye / Kobozha 0369 protected mire км 35°20' 251 35°40' 36°0' 252 36°0' 36°20' 36°40' 218 219 239 Duplishche protected mire Kharinsky Lake Bolshoe-Volkovo zakaznik nature monument Planned nature monument Linden Alley 59°30' Pine forest Sudsky, °30' nature monument 59 Klyuchi zakaznik BABAEVO абаево Great Mosses Maza River 59°20'
    [Show full text]
  • Interdisciplinary and Comparative Methodologies
    The Retrospective Methods Network Newsletter Interdisciplinary and Comparative Methodologies № 14 Exploring Circum-Baltic Cultures and Beyond Guest Editors: Joonas Ahola and Kendra Willson Published by Folklore Studies / Department of Cultures University of Helsinki, Helsinki 1 RMN Newsletter is a medium of contact and communication for members of the Retrospective Methods Network (RMN). The RMN is an open network which can include anyone who wishes to share in its focus. It is united by an interest in the problems, approaches, strategies and limitations related to considering some aspect of culture in one period through evidence from another, later period. Such comparisons range from investigating historical relationships to the utility of analogical parallels, and from comparisons across centuries to developing working models for the more immediate traditions behind limited sources. RMN Newsletter sets out to provide a venue and emergent discourse space in which individual scholars can discuss and engage in vital cross- disciplinary dialogue, present reports and announcements of their own current activities, and where information about events, projects and institutions is made available. RMN Newsletter is edited by Frog, Helen F. Leslie-Jacobsen, Joseph S. Hopkins, Robert Guyker and Simon Nygaard, published by: Folklore Studies / Department of Cultures University of Helsinki PO Box 59 (Unioninkatu 38 C 217) 00014 University of Helsinki Finland The open-access electronic edition of this publication is available on-line at: https://www.helsinki.fi/en/networks/retrospective-methods-network Interdisciplinary and Comparative Methodologies: Exploring Circum-Baltic Cultures and Beyond is a special issue organized and edited by Frog, Joonas Ahola and Kendra Willson. © 2019 RMN Newsletter; authors retain rights to reproduce their own works and to grant permission for the reproductions of those works.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments of Church Architecture in Belozersk: Late Sixteenth to the Early Nineteenth Centuries
    russian history 44 (2017) 260-297 brill.com/ruhi Monuments of Church Architecture in Belozersk: Late Sixteenth to the Early Nineteenth Centuries William Craft Brumfield Professor of Slavic Studies and Sizeler Professor of Jewish Studies, Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies, Tulane University, New Orleans [email protected] Abstract The history of the community associated with the White Lake (Beloe Ozero) is a rich one. This article covers a brief overview of the developing community from medieval through modern times, and then focuses the majority of its attention on the church ar- chitecture of Belozersk. This rich tradition of material culture increases our knowledge about medieval and early modern Rus’ and Russia. Keywords Beloozero – Belozersk – Russian Architecture – Church Architecture The origins and early location of Belozersk (now a regional town in the center of Vologda oblast’) are subject to discussion, but it is uncontestably one of the oldest recorded settlements among the eastern Slavs. “Beloozero” is mentioned in the Primary Chronicle (or Chronicle of Bygone Years; Povest’ vremennykh let) under the year 862 as one of the five towns granted to the Varangian brothers Riurik, Sineus and Truvor, invited (according to the chronicle) to rule over the eastern Slavs in what was then called Rus’.1 1 The Chronicle text in contemporary Russian translation is as follows: “B гoд 6370 (862). И изгнaли вapягoв зa мope, и нe дaли им дaни, и нaчaли caми coбoй влaдeть, и нe былo cpeди ниx пpaвды, и вcтaл poд нa poд, и былa у ниx уcoбицa, и cтaли вoeвaть дpуг c дpугoм. И cкaзaли: «Пoищeм caми ceбe князя, кoтopый бы влaдeл нaми и pядил пo pяду и пo зaкoну».
    [Show full text]
  • Maps -- by Region Or Country -- Eastern Hemisphere -- Europe
    G5702 EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5702 Alps see G6035+ .B3 Baltic Sea .B4 Baltic Shield .C3 Carpathian Mountains .C6 Coasts/Continental shelf .G4 Genoa, Gulf of .G7 Great Alföld .P9 Pyrenees .R5 Rhine River .S3 Scheldt River .T5 Tisza River 1971 G5722 WESTERN EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL G5722 FEATURES, ETC. .A7 Ardennes .A9 Autoroute E10 .F5 Flanders .G3 Gaul .M3 Meuse River 1972 G5741.S BRITISH ISLES. HISTORY G5741.S .S1 General .S2 To 1066 .S3 Medieval period, 1066-1485 .S33 Norman period, 1066-1154 .S35 Plantagenets, 1154-1399 .S37 15th century .S4 Modern period, 1485- .S45 16th century: Tudors, 1485-1603 .S5 17th century: Stuarts, 1603-1714 .S53 Commonwealth and protectorate, 1660-1688 .S54 18th century .S55 19th century .S6 20th century .S65 World War I .S7 World War II 1973 G5742 BRITISH ISLES. GREAT BRITAIN. REGIONS, G5742 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .C6 Continental shelf .I6 Irish Sea .N3 National Cycle Network 1974 G5752 ENGLAND. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5752 .A3 Aire River .A42 Akeman Street .A43 Alde River .A7 Arun River .A75 Ashby Canal .A77 Ashdown Forest .A83 Avon, River [Gloucestershire-Avon] .A85 Avon, River [Leicestershire-Gloucestershire] .A87 Axholme, Isle of .A9 Aylesbury, Vale of .B3 Barnstaple Bay .B35 Basingstoke Canal .B36 Bassenthwaite Lake .B38 Baugh Fell .B385 Beachy Head .B386 Belvoir, Vale of .B387 Bere, Forest of .B39 Berkeley, Vale of .B4 Berkshire Downs .B42 Beult, River .B43 Bignor Hill .B44 Birmingham and Fazeley Canal .B45 Black Country .B48 Black Hill .B49 Blackdown Hills .B493 Blackmoor [Moor] .B495 Blackmoor Vale .B5 Bleaklow Hill .B54 Blenheim Park .B6 Bodmin Moor .B64 Border Forest Park .B66 Bourne Valley .B68 Bowland, Forest of .B7 Breckland .B715 Bredon Hill .B717 Brendon Hills .B72 Bridgewater Canal .B723 Bridgwater Bay .B724 Bridlington Bay .B725 Bristol Channel .B73 Broads, The .B76 Brown Clee Hill .B8 Burnham Beeches .B84 Burntwick Island .C34 Cam, River .C37 Cannock Chase .C38 Canvey Island [Island] 1975 G5752 ENGLAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    E3S Web of Conferences 266, 08011 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126608011 TOPICAL ISSUES 2021 Ensuring environmental safety of the Baltic Sea basin E.E. Smirnova, L.D. Tokareva Department of Technosphere Safety, St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, St. Petersburg, Russia Abstract:The Baltic Sea is not only important for transport, but for a long time it has been supplying people with seafood. In 1998, the Government of the Russian Federation adopted Decree N 1202 “On approval of the 1992 Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Region”, according to which Russia approved the Helsinki Convention and its obligations. However, the threat of eutrophication has become urgent for the Baltic Sea basin and Northwest region due to the increased concentration of phosphorus and nitrogen in wastewater. This article studies the methods of dephosphation of wastewater using industrial waste. 1 Introduction The main topic of the article is to show the possibility of using industrial waste as reagents to optimize the water treatment system of rivers flowing into the Baltic Sea and water reservoirs of the Northwest-region (including part of the water system of the Vologda Region associated with the Baltic basin) in order to bring the quality of wastewater to the international requirements established for the Baltic Sea. These measures will help to improve the environmental situation in the sphere of waste processing and thereby ensure an acceptable degree of trophicity of the reservoirs. As far as self-purification processes in rivers and seas cannot provide complete recovery from wastewater pollution, the problem of removing phosphorus-containing compounds from wastewater and purifying wastewater is of great importance [1-3].
    [Show full text]
  • The First Romanovs. (1613-1725)
    Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028446767 Cornell University Library DK 114.B16 First Romanovs. (1613-1725 3 1924 028 446 767 THE FIRST ROMANOVS. ^etnuXJ ,(/? V.Xuissoru/TL 'mpcralor Jraler atruoLJ Mter- a, ^r^c^t at tAe O^e of // : The First Romanovs. (1613— 1725.) A HISTORY OF MOSCOVITE CIVILISATION AND THE RISE OF MODERN RUSSIA UNDER PETER THE GREAT AND HIS FORERUNNERS. By R. NISBET BAIN. fntH ILLUSTRATIONS. LONDON ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE & CO., Ltd., 16, JAMES STREET, HAYMARKET, 1905- BRADBURY, AGNEW, & CO. LD., PRINTERS, LONDON AND TONBRIOGE.' MY MOTHER. INTRODUCTION. It will be my endeavour, in the following pages, to describe the social, ecclesiastical, and political conditions of Eastern Europe from 1613 to 1725, and trace the gradual transformation, during the seventeenth century, of the semi-mOpastic, semi-barbarous Tsardom of Moscovy into the modern Russian State. The emergence of the unlooked-for and unwelcome Empire of the Tsars in the Old World was an event not inferior in importance to the discovery of the unsuspected Continents of the New, and the manner of its advent was even stranger than the advent itself. Like all periods of sudden transition, the century which divides the age of Ivan the Great from the age of Peter the Great has its own peculiar interest, abounding, as it does, in singular contradictions and picturesque contrasts. Throughout this period. East and West, savagery and civilisation strive incessantly for the mastery, and sinister and colossal shapes> fit representatives of wildly contending, elemental forces, flit phantasmagorically across the dirty ways; of the twilight scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement of Geosci
    Supplement of Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1343–1375, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1343-2018-supplement © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Supplement of LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 1: Model description Sibyll Schaphoff et al. Correspondence to: Sibyll Schaphoff ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License. S1 Supplementary informations to the evaluation of the LPJmL4 model The here provided supplementary informations give more details to the evaluations given in Schaphoff et al.(under Revision). All sources and data used are described in detail there. Here we present ad- ditional figures for evaluating the LPJmL4 model on a plot scale for water and carbon fluxes Fig. S1 5 - S16. Here we use the standard input as described by Schaphoff et al.(under Revision, Section 2.1). Furthermore, we evaluate the model performance on eddy flux tower sites by using site specific me- teorological input data provided by http://fluxnet.fluxdata.org/data/la-thuile-dataset/(ORNL DAAC, 2011). Here the long time spin up of 5000 years was made with the input data described in Schaphoff et al.(under Revision), but an additional spin up of 30 years was conducted with the site specific 10 input data followed by the transient run given by the observation period. Comparisons are shown for some illustrative stations for net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in Fig. S17 and for evapotranspira- tion Fig. S18.
    [Show full text]
  • Totma, a Small Russian Town
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: Totma, A Small Russian Town Author (s): Elya Vasilyeva Source: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: http://www.fortross.org/lib.html Unless otherwise noted in the manuscript, each author maintains copyright of his or her written material. Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the distributor of the content; if you use material from FRC’s online library, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Digital content courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org; author maintains copyright of his or her written material.” Also please consider becoming a member of Fort Ross Conservancy to ensure our work of promoting and protecting Fort Ross continues: http://www.fortross.org/join.htm. This online repository, funded by Renova Fort Ross Foundation, is brought to you by Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association. FRC’s mission is to connect people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. By Elya Vasilyeva Photographs by ~lexander Lyskin Along the banks of the -~-- ... Sukhona River sits the town of TobN, which has the black fox of North otma is the home town of Ivan Kuskov, the founder of Few Russians know about the · Fort Ross, a Russian settlement in northern California. town of Totma, and even The well-preserved house in which he lived can still be seen at the Fort Ross Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLOGDA REGION on Behalf of My Landsmen I Am Happy to Present Vologda Region to You
    VOLOGDA REGION On behalf of my landsmen I am happy to present Vologda region to you. Ancient history of Vologda region traces back to the depth of the centuries. Vologda land played an important part in formation of the Russian nation, made great contribution to the treasury of Russian and world culture. Nowadays, a favourable geographical position of the region, its natural resources, high-skilled specialists, programmed and targeted approach to economic management, fovourable opportunities for business development open wide prospects for active, energetic and enterprising people. Vologda region is an industrially developed and an export- oriented region of Russia's North-West. We have long- standing commercial and economic relations with more than 100 countries all over the world. We construct roads and lay gas pipelines, harvest and process timber, supply Russian and foreign markets with high-quality foodstuffs, cast steel, grow flax, make wonderful laces and produce modern trolley-buses, annually receive tens of thousands of tourists. Vologda region is hospitality and kindliness, innumerable monuments of glorious past, picturesque landscapes and miracles of nature. All this makes Vologda region an interesting and attractive area for tourists. I am sure that investor's guide, that you are holding now, will be the first step to acquaintance and mutually beneficial cooperation with Vologda region. Oleg Kuvshinnikov, Vologda region Governor 2 Geographical location Region is situated in the north 1700 km of the European part of Russia Helsinki total 144,5 area ths. sq km number of 1,2 population million people St. Petersburg - VOLOGDA REGION Vologda Cherepovets Potential sales market- Jaroslavl 50 million N.
    [Show full text]