DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplement of Geosci

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplement of Geosci Supplement of Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1343–1375, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1343-2018-supplement © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Supplement of LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 1: Model description Sibyll Schaphoff et al. Correspondence to: Sibyll Schaphoff ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License. S1 Supplementary informations to the evaluation of the LPJmL4 model The here provided supplementary informations give more details to the evaluations given in Schaphoff et al.(under Revision). All sources and data used are described in detail there. Here we present ad- ditional figures for evaluating the LPJmL4 model on a plot scale for water and carbon fluxes Fig. S1 5 - S16. Here we use the standard input as described by Schaphoff et al.(under Revision, Section 2.1). Furthermore, we evaluate the model performance on eddy flux tower sites by using site specific me- teorological input data provided by http://fluxnet.fluxdata.org/data/la-thuile-dataset/(ORNL DAAC, 2011). Here the long time spin up of 5000 years was made with the input data described in Schaphoff et al.(under Revision), but an additional spin up of 30 years was conducted with the site specific 10 input data followed by the transient run given by the observation period. Comparisons are shown for some illustrative stations for net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in Fig. S17 and for evapotranspira- tion Fig. S18. Only 2 stations show a slightly better performance of LPJmL4 to NEE measurements and for evapotranspiration only 1 station, the others show a similar correlation as the simulations conducted with global climate input. 15 We use gauging station to evaluate the river discharge as an integrated measure (Fig. S19- S66). Fig. S68a compares the two evaluation data sets against each other. The comparison of the global data set from (Jung et al., 2011) to the local data (Luyssaert et al., 2007) shows that both data sets are in good agreement. The comparison of LPJmL4 against the global data set of Jung et al.(2011) on the local scale (Fig. S68b show a slightly worse match as the comparison against the local data 20 (see Fig. 4, main text). Fig. S68c compares LPJmL4 against the global data set from (Jung et al., 2011), but excluding outliers with very high GPP. That increases the match to these data to a NMSE of 0.69 and a R2 of 0.51. These comparisons show also that the comparisons on both scales are meaningful and can give a good indication how good the model can reproduce global as well as local biomass estimations by different methods. Fig. S67 and Fig. S69a give a comparison with the 25 global estimation of Carvalhais et al.(2014) for soil organic carbon resp. biomass. Additionally we have compared aboveground biomass in Fig. S69b with estimates by Liu et al.(2015). A spatial comparison of ecosystem respiration is shown in Fig. S70. Evapotranspiration comparison against MTE data (Jung et al., 2011) is shown in Fig. S71 and Fig. S72 shows a comparison of simulated fractional burnt area against remote sensing observations (GFED4: http://www.globalfiredata.org/ 30 and CCI Fire Version 4.1: http://cci.esa.int/data). Remote sensing data are also used for the evaluation of FAPAR (Fig. S73) and Albedo (Fig. S74). Sowing dates have been proved to be important to simulate crop variability (Fig. S75- S83), a comparison with MIRCA sowing dates we show in Fig. S84- S93. Table S1 gives an overview of estimates for regional field application efficiencies, showing that 35 LPJmL4 are in a similar range as other estimates. 1 Kaamanen_wetland 69.14 N / 27.3 E NEE 100 r2 = 0.31, W = 0.67, NMSE = 3.1, NME = 1.6 50 LPJmL4 fluxes 0 Euroflux and Ameriflux Data gC/m2/month −100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 AK−Ivotuk 68.49 N / 155.75 W Sodankyla 67.36 N / 26.64 E 2 = = = = 2 = = = = 50 r 0.17, W 0.62, NMSE 2.2, NME 1.3 r 0.68, W 0.87, NMSE 0.76, NME 0.92 100 50 0 0 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −50 −100 2004 2005 2006 2007 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Flakaliden 64.11 N / 19.46 E Hyytiala 61.85 N / 24.29 E 2 = = = = 100 2 = = = = 100 r 0.53, W 0.85, NMSE 0.54, NME 0.72 r 0.78, W 0.94, NMSE 0.23, NME 0.43 50 50 0 0 −50 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −150 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1998 2000 2002 2004 Norunda 60.09 N / 17.48 E Griffin−Aberfeldy−Scotland 56.61 N / 3.8 W r2 = 0.39, W = 0.74, NMSE = 0.89, NME = 0.91 r2 = 0.6, W = 0.68, NMSE = 1.1, NME = 1 50 50 −50 −50 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −150 −150 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 −250 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 UCI−1930_burn_site 55.91 N / 98.52 W UCI−1964_burn_site 55.91 N / 98.38 W r2 = 0.25, W = 0.65, NMSE = 1.2, NME = 0.87 r2 = 0.41, W = 0.79, NMSE = 0.67, NME = 0.73 100 50 50 0 0 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −50 −100 −100 2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003 2004 2005 East_Saltoun 55.91 N / 2.86 W UCI−1981_burn_site 55.86 N / 98.48 W r2 = 0.6, W = 0.92, NMSE = 0.3, NME = 0.58 r2 = 0.38, W = 0.76, NMSE = 0.71, NME = 0.68 50 50 0 0 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −50 −100 −200 2004 2005 2006 2002 2003 2004 2005 Figure S1. Comparison of NEE fluxes with EDDY-flux measurements. 2 Lille_Valby 55.68 N / 12.08 E r2 = 0.3, W = 0.77, NMSE = 0.65, NME = 0.75 NEE 100 LPJmL4 fluxes 0 Euroflux and Ameriflux Data gC/m2/month −200 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Soroe−LilleBogeskov 55.49 N / 11.65 E Loobos 52.17 N / 5.74 E 2 2 r = 0.81, W = 0.95, NMSE = 0.17, NME = 0.39 100 r = 0.79, W = 0.91, NMSE = 0.46, NME = 0.67 50 50 0 0 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −100 −200 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Horstermeer 52.03 N / 5.07 E Cabauw 51.97 N / 4.93 E 100 100 r2 = 0.67, W = 0.92, NMSE = 0.37, NME = 0.58 r2 = 0.36, W = 0.72, NMSE = 1.6, NME = 1.2 50 50 0 0 −50 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −150 2004 2005 2006 2007 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Brasschaat 51.31 N / 4.52 E Mehrstedt 51.28 N / 10.66 E r2 = 0.75, W = 0.92, NMSE = 0.29, NME = 0.48 r2 = 0.46, W = 0.84, NMSE = 1.2, NME = 1 100 50 50 0 0 −50 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −150 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 Gebesee 51.1 N / 10.91 E Hainich 51.08 N / 10.45 E 2 2 r = 0.15, W = 0.69, NMSE = 0.73, NME = 0.74 100 r = 0.47, W = 0.73, NMSE = 0.63, NME = 0.65 100 0 0 −100 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −200 −300 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Tharandt−old_spruce 50.96 N / 13.57 E Lonzee 50.55 N / 4.74 E r2 = 0.8, W = 0.83, NMSE = 0.72, NME = 0.83 r2 = 0.1, W = 0.54, NMSE = 0.79, NME = 0.8 50 0 0 −200 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −400 −200 1998 2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Figure S2. Comparison of NEE fluxes with EDDY-flux measurements. 3 Wetzstein 50.45 N / 11.46 E r2 = 0.66, W = 0.89, NMSE = 0.4, NME = 0.56 NEE 100 LPJmL4 fluxes 50 0 Euroflux and Ameriflux Data gC/m2/month −100 2002 2004 2006 2008 Vielsalm 50.31 N / 6 E Bily_Kriz−_Beskidy_Mountains 49.5 N / 18.54 E r2 = 0.82, W = 0.87, NMSE = 0.49, NME = 0.65 r2 = 0.59, W = 0.78, NMSE = 0.76, NME = 0.8 50 50 0 0 −50 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −150 −200 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Bily_Kriz−_grassland 49.5 N / 18.54 E Hesse_Forest−Sarrebourg 48.67 N / 7.06 E 100 r2 = 0.62, W = 0.83, NMSE = 0.74, NME = 0.77 r2 = 0.59, W = 0.78, NMSE = 0.49, NME = 0.58 50 100 0 0 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −200 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Neustift/Stubai 47.12 N / 11.32 E WI−Mature_red_pine 46.74 N / 91.17 W r2 = 0.19, W = 0.68, NMSE = 1.2, NME = 0.93 r2 = 0.34, W = 0.44, NMSE = 6.3, NME = 2.7 50 50 −50 −50 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −150 −150 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 −250 2003 2004 2005 2006 Bugacpuszta 46.69 N / 19.6 E Renon/Ritten 46.59 N / 11.43 E r2 = 0.29, W = 0.77, NMSE = 0.96, NME = 0.91 r2 = 0.51, W = 0.72, NMSE = 1.2, NME = 1 100 50 50 0 0 −50 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −150 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 WI−Lost_Creek 46.08 N / 89.98 W WI−Willow_Creek 45.81 N / 90.08 W 100 2 = = = = 2 = = = = r 0.14, W 0.59, NMSE 1.2, NME 0.9 100 r 0.27, W 0.51, NMSE 0.91, NME 0.77 50 0 0 −100 gC/m2/month gC/m2/month −100 −300 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2000 2002 2004 2006 Figure S3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Rivers of Mongolia
    Sl. No River Name Russian Name Draining Into 1 Yenisei River Russia Arctic Ocean 2 Angara River Russia, flowing out of Lake Baikal Arctic Ocean 3 Selenge River Сэлэнгэ мөрөн in Sükhbaatar, flowing into Lake Baikal Arctic Ocean 4 Chikoy River Arctic Ocean 5 Menza River Arctic Ocean 6 Katantsa River Arctic Ocean 7 Dzhida River Russia Arctic Ocean 8 Zelter River Зэлтэрийн гол, Bulgan/Selenge/Russia Arctic Ocean 9 Orkhon River Орхон гол, Arkhangai/Övörkhangai/Bulgan/Selenge Arctic Ocean 10 Tuul River Туул гол, Khentii/Töv/Bulgan/Selenge Arctic Ocean 11 Tamir River Тамир гол, Arkhangai Arctic Ocean 12 Kharaa River Хараа гол, Töv/Selenge/Darkhan-Uul Arctic Ocean 13 Eg River Эгийн гол, Khövsgöl/Bulgan Arctic Ocean 14 Üür River Үүрийн гол, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 15 Uilgan River Уйлган гол, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 16 Arigiin River Аригийн гол, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 17 Tarvagatai River Тарвагтай гол, Bulgan Arctic Ocean 18 Khanui River Хануй гол, Arkhangai/Bulgan Arctic Ocean 19 Ider River Идэр гол, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 20 Chuluut River Чулуут гол, Arkhangai/Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 21 Suman River Суман гол, Arkhangai Arctic Ocean 22 Delgermörön Дэлгэрмөрөн, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 23 Beltes River Бэлтэсийн Гол, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 24 Bügsiin River Бүгсийн Гол, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 25 Lesser Yenisei Russia Arctic Ocean 26 Kyzyl-Khem Кызыл-Хем Arctic Ocean 27 Büsein River Arctic Ocean 28 Shishged River Шишгэд гол, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 29 Sharga River Шарга гол, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 30 Tengis River Тэнгис гол, Khövsgöl Arctic Ocean 31 Amur River Russia/China
    [Show full text]
  • Buryat Cumhuriyeti'nin Turizm Potansiyeli Ve Başlıca
    SDÜ FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ, AĞUSTOS 2021, SAYI: 53, SS. 136-179 SDU FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, AUGUST 2021, No: 53, PP. 136-179 Makale Geliş | Received : 07.06.2021 Makale Kabul | Accepted : 31.08.2021 Emin ATASOY Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Türkçe ve Sosyal Bilimler Eğitimi Bölümü [email protected] ORCID Numarası|ORCID Numbers: 0000-0002-6073-6461 Erol KAPLUHAN Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Coğrafya Bölümü [email protected] ORCID Numarası|ORCID Numbers: 0000-0002-2500-1259 Yerbol PANGALİYEV [email protected] ORCID Numarası|ORCID Numbers: 0000-0002-2392-4180 Buryat Cumhuriyeti’nin Turizm Potansiyeli ve Başlıca Turizm Kaynakları Touristic Potential And Major Touristic Attractions Of Buryatia Republic Öz Rusya Federasyonu’nun Güney Sibirya Bölgesi’nde yer alan Buryat Cumhuriyeti, Saha Cumhuriyeti ve Komi Cumhuriyeti’nden sonra Rusya’nın en büyük yüzölçümüne sahip üçüncü özerk cumhuriyetidir. Siyasi yapılanma olarak Uzakdoğu Federal İdari Bölgesi, ekonomik yapılanma olarak ise Uzakdoğu İktisadi Bölge sınırları içinde yer alan Buryatya, Doğu Sibirya’nın güney kesimlerinde ve Moğolistan’ın kuzeyinde yer almaktadır. Araştırmada coğrafyanın temel araştırma metotları gözetilmiş, kaynak tarama yöntemi aracılığıyla ilgili kaynaklar ve yayınlar temin edilerek veri tabanı oluşturulmuştur. Elde edilen verilerin değerlendirilmesi için haritalar, şekiller ve tablolar oluşturulmuştur. Konunun net anlaşılması amacıyla Buryat Cumhuriyeti’nin lokasyon, Buryat Cumhuriyeti Kültürel Turizm Merkezleri, Buryat Cumhuriyeti’nin Doğal turizm alanları, Buryat Cumhuriyeti milli parkları ve doğa koruma alanları haritalarının yanı sıra ifadeleri güçlendirmek için konular arasındaki bağlantılar tablo ile vurgulanmıştır. Tüm bu coğrafi olumsuzluklara rağmen, Buryatya zengin doğal kaynaklarıyla, geniş Tayga ormanlarıyla, yüzlerce göl ve akarsu havzasıyla, yüzlerce sağlık, kültür ve inanç merkeziyle, çok sayıda kaplıca, müze ve doğa koruma alanıyla, Rusya’nın en zengin turizm kaynaklarına sahip cumhuriyetlerinden biridir.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Forest Sector in the Arkhangelsk Oblast During the Transition Period of the 1990S
    Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s ALBINA PASHKEVICH Pashkevich Albina (2003). Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s. Fennia 181: 1, pp. 13–24. Helsinki. ISSN 0015-0010. The Arkhangelsk oblast has long been one of Russia’s most important forest industrial regions. This paper analyses the changes in accessibility of forest resources and forest commodity production during the transition period in the 1990s. Special attention is given to firm restructuring, active roles of domestic capital and the different survival strategies that have been developed by in- dustries in the region. Further analysis deals with signs of economic recovery in the forest sector due to the processes of restructuring, modernisation and self-organisation. Albina Pashkevich, Spatial Modelling Centre (SMC), Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Box 839, SE-98128 Kiruna, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]. MS received 12 August 2002. Introduction adoption of a new. Some suggest that this proc- ess has been deeply embedded in the nature of The shift from central planning to a market-based the socialist system (Dingsdale 1999; Hamilton economy in Russia culminated with the dramatic 1999) and that the legacy of the communism has economic and political reorientation that began been only partly removed, and instead has mere- in the 1990s. This transition towards a market-ori- ly been reworked in a complex way (Smith 1997). ented and outward-looking economic system led Others say that reforms have actually ended the by private sector has created new challenges and old ‘command economy’ but have instead suc- opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Climatic Change and Human Activity on Erosion Processes in Sub-Arid Watersheds in Southern East Siberia
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES Hydrol. Process. 17, 3181–3193 (2003) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1382 The influence of climatic change and human activity on erosion processes in sub-arid watersheds in southern East Siberia Leonid M. Korytny,* Olga I. Bazhenova, Galina N. Martianova and Elena A. Ilyicheva Institute of Geography, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1 Ulanbatorskaya St., Irkutsk, 664033, Russia Abstract: A LUCIFS model variant is presented that represents the influence of climate and land use change on fluvial systems. The study considers trends of climatic characteristics (air temperature, annual precipitation totals, rainfall erosion index, aridity and continentality coefficients) for the steppe and partially wooded steppe watersheds of the south of East Siberia (the Yenisey River macro-watershed). It also describes the influence of these characteristics on erosion processes, one indicator of which is the suspended sediment yield. Changes in the river network structure (the order of rivers, lengths, etc.) as a result of agricultural activity during the 20th century are investigated by means of analysis of maps of different dates for one of the watersheds, that of the Selenga River, the biggest tributary of Lake Baikal. The study reveals an increase of erosion process intensity in the first two-thirds of the century in the Selenga River watershed and a reduction of this intensity in the last third of the century, both in the Selenga River watershed and in most of the other watersheds of the study area. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KEY WORDS LUCIFS; Yenisey watershed; fluvial system; climate change; land use change; river network structure; erosion processes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 (3)/2017 Scientific Journal “Fundamentalis Scientiam” (Madrid, Spain)
    №2 (3)/2017 Scientific journal “Fundamentalis scientiam” (Madrid, Spain) ISSN 0378-5955 The journal is registered and published in Spain It is published 12 times a year. Articles are accepted in Spanish, Polish, English, Russian, Ukrainian, German, French languages for publication. Scientific journal “Fundamentalis scientiam” (lat. “Basic Science”) was established in Spain in the autumn of 2016. Its goal is attracting the masses to the interest of “knowledge.” We have immediately decided to grow to the international level, namely to bond the scientists of the Eurasian continent under the aegis of the common work, by filling the journal with research materials, articles, and results of work. Editorial board: Chief editor: Petr Novotný – Palacky University, Olomouc Managing editor: Lukáš Procházka – Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem Petrenko Vladislav, PhD in geography, lecturer in social and economic geography. (Kiev, Ukraine) Andrea Biyanchi – University of Pavia, Pavia Bence Kovács – University of Szeged, Szeged Franz Gruber – University of Karl and Franz, Graz Jean Thomas – University of Limoges, Limoges Igor Frennen – Politechnika Krakowska im. Tadeusza Kościuszki Plaza Santa Maria Soledad Torres Acosta, Madrid, 28004 E-mai: [email protected] Web: www.fundamentalis-scientiam.com CONTENT CULTURAL SCIENCES Tattigul Kartaeva, Ainur Yermekbayeva THE SEMANTICS OF THE CHEST IN KAZAKH CULTURE .................................................................. 4 ECONOMICS Khakhonova N.N. INTERCONNECTION OF ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS IN THE COMPANY MANAGEMENT ...................................................... 10 HISTORICAL SCIENCES Bexeitov G.T., Satayeva B.E. Kunanbaeva A. СURRENT CONDITION AND RESEARCH SYSTEM FEEDS KAZAKHS .................................. 25 PROBLEMS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL Eleuov Madiyar, Moldakhmet Arkhad EXCAVATIONS CONDUCTED WERE MADE IN MEDIEVAL SITE UTYRTOBE .............................. 28 THE MONUMENTS OF NEAR THE LOCATION– RAKHAT IN 2015 (ALMATY) ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Safety in Central Asia
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Geneva Water Series No. 5 Dam safety in Central Asia: Capacity-building and regional cooperation UNITED NATIONS ECE/MP.WAT/26 ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Geneva Water Series № 5 DAM SAFETY IN CENTRAL ASIA: CAPACITY-BUILDING AND REGIONAL COOPERATION UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva 2007 ii NOTICE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/MP.WAT/26 UNECE Information Unit Phone: +41 (0)22 917 44 44 Palais des Nations Fax: +41 (0)22 917 05 05 CH-1211 Geneva 10 E-mail: [email protected] Switzerland Website: http://www.unece.org UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No E.07.II.E.10 ISBN 92-1-116962-1 ISSN 1020-0886 Copyright © United Nations, 2007 All rights reserved Printed at United Nations, Geneva (Switzerland) iii FOREWORD The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), in particular through its Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, is engaged in promoting cooperation on the management of shared water resources in Central Asia – a pre-condition for sustainable development in the subregion. One direction of activities is promoting the safe operation of more than 100 large dams, most of which are situated on transboundary rivers. Many of these dams were built 40 to 50 years ago, and due to limited resources for their maintenance and the inadequacy of a legal framework for their safe operation, the risk of accidents is increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R
    STUDIA FORESTALIA SUECICA NR 39 1966 Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. An Analysis of Soviet Competitive Potentialities Skogsekonomi i Sovjet~rnionen rned en unalys av landets potentiella konkurrenskraft by KARL VIICTOR ALGTTERE SICOGSH~GSICOLAN ROYAL COLLEGE OF FORESTRY STOCKHOLM Lord Keynes on the role of the economist: "He must study the present in the light of the past for the purpose of the future." Printed in Sweden by ESSELTE AB STOCKHOLM Foreword Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. is a special study of the forestry sector of the Soviet economy. As such it makes a further contribution to the studies undertaken in recent years to elucidate the means and ends in Soviet planning; also it attempts to assess the competitive potentialities of the U.S.S.R. in international trade. Soviet studies now command a very great interest and are being undertaken at some twenty universities and research institutes mainly in the United States, the United Kingdoin and the German Federal Republic. However, it would seem that the study of the development of the forestry sector has riot received the detailed attention given to other fields. In any case, there have not been any analytical studies published to date elucidating fully the connection between forestry and the forest industries and the integration of both in the economy as a whole. Studies of specific sections have appeared from time to time, but I have no knowledge of any previous study which gives a complete picture of the Soviet forest economy and which could faci- litate the marketing policies of the western world, being undertaken at any university or college.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petroleum Potential of the Riphean–Vendian Succession of Southern East Siberia
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253369249 The petroleum potential of the Riphean–Vendian succession of southern East Siberia CHAPTER in GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY LONDON SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS · MAY 2012 Impact Factor: 2.58 · DOI: 10.1144/SP366.1 CITATIONS READS 2 95 4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Olga K. Bogolepova Uppsala University 51 PUBLICATIONS 271 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Alexander P. Gubanov Scandiz Research 55 PUBLICATIONS 485 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: Olga K. Bogolepova Retrieved on: 08 March 2016 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on March 25, 2013 Geological Society, London, Special Publications The petroleum potential of the Riphean-Vendian succession of southern East Siberia James P. Howard, Olga K. Bogolepova, Alexander P. Gubanov and Marcela G?mez-Pérez Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2012, v.366; p177-198. doi: 10.1144/SP366.1 Email alerting click here to receive free e-mail alerts when service new articles cite this article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or request part of this article Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes © The Geological Society of London 2013 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on March 25, 2013 The petroleum potential of the Riphean–Vendian succession of southern East Siberia JAMES P. HOWARD*, OLGA K. BOGOLEPOVA, ALEXANDER P. GUBANOV & MARCELA GO´ MEZ-PE´ REZ CASP, West Building, 181a Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DH, UK *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: The Siberian Platform covers an area of c.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • European Freshwater Mussels (Unio Spp., Unionidae) in Siberia and Kazakhstan: Pleistocene Relicts Or Recent Invaders?
    Limnologica 90 (2021) 125903 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Limnologica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/limno European freshwater mussels (Unio spp., Unionidae) in Siberia and Kazakhstan: Pleistocene relicts or recent invaders? E.S. Babushkin a,b,c,*, M.V. Vinarski a,d, A.V. Kondakov a,e, A.A. Tomilova e, M.E. Grebennikov f, V.A. Stolbov g, I.N. Bolotov a,e a Laboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Emb., 7/9, 199034, Saint-Petersburg, Russia b Surgut State University, Lenina Ave., 1, 628403, Surgut, Russia c Tyumen Scientific Center, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Malygina St., 86, 625026, Tyumen, Russia d Omsk State Pedagogical University, 14 Tukhachevskogo Emb., 644099, Omsk, Russia e N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Northern Dvina Emb., 23, 163000, Arkhangelsk, Russia f Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 8 marta St., 202, 620144, Yekaterinburg, Russia g Tyumen State University, Volodarskogo St., 6, 625003, Tyumen, Russia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Unionidae is a species-rich family of large freshwater mussels with an almost worldwide distribution. In many Bivalves regions of the world, these mussels are imperiled. Northern Asia, excluding the Far East, is an excellent example ’ Ob River basin of a region with a sharply impoverished fauna of the Unionidae as recently thought with one native species. Since Range recovery the end of the 19th century, two freshwater mussel species of the genus Unio (U. pictorum and U.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Forest Management and Urban Green Spaces in the Post-Stalinist Press, 1953-1982
    Soviet Forest Management and Urban Green Spaces in the Post-Stalinist Press, 1953-1982 Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of History Gregory L. Freeze, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History by Allison Brown May 2016 Copyright by Allison Brown © 2016 ABSTRACT Soviet Forest Management and Urban Green Spaces in the Post-Stalinist Press, 1953-1982 A thesis presented to the Department of History Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Allison Brown In the decades following Joseph Stalin’s death in 1953, the Soviet government largely continued his policies of accelerated industrialization. This drive for industrial growth had a profound impact on Soviet forests and the industry that was responsible for their management. While certain sectors of the economy, such as the military and space programs, enjoyed significant attention and monetary contributions from the government in the latter half of the twentieth century, the forestry industry was less fortunate. The Khrushchev and Brezhnev eras (1953-82) were plagued by poor communications between state officials and the management structure of the forestry sector, a lack of investment to train specialists and to develop new technologies and techniques, little commitment to waste reduction and more efficient use of resources, and an inability to break “old habits” that had beset that sector of the industry for decades. While the forestry industry struggled to modernize and reorganize, city planners faced challenges in meeting the demands of city-dwellers and state officials, who demanded the inclusion of urban green spaces and forest belts in both old and new cities.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAINAGE BASINS of the WHITE SEA, BARENTS SEA and KARA SEA Chapter 1
    38 DRAINAGE BASINS OF THE WHITE SEA, BARENTS SEA AND KARA SEA Chapter 1 WHITE SEA, BARENTS SEA AND KARA SEA 39 41 OULANKA RIVER BASIN 42 TULOMA RIVER BASIN 44 JAKOBSELV RIVER BASIN 44 PAATSJOKI RIVER BASIN 45 LAKE INARI 47 NÄATAMÖ RIVER BASIN 47 TENO RIVER BASIN 49 YENISEY RIVER BASIN 51 OB RIVER BASIN Chapter 1 40 WHITE SEA, BARENT SEA AND KARA SEA This chapter deals with major transboundary rivers discharging into the White Sea, the Barents Sea and the Kara Sea and their major transboundary tributaries. It also includes lakes located within the basins of these seas. TRANSBOUNDARY WATERS IN THE BASINS OF THE BARENTS SEA, THE WHITE SEA AND THE KARA SEA Basin/sub-basin(s) Total area (km2) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin Oulanka …1 White Sea FI, RU … Kola Fjord > Tuloma 21,140 FI, RU … Barents Sea Jacobselv 400 Barents Sea NO, RU … Paatsjoki 18,403 Barents Sea FI, NO, RU Lake Inari Näätämö 2,962 Barents Sea FI, NO, RU … Teno 16,386 Barents Sea FI, NO … Yenisey 2,580,000 Kara Sea MN, RU … Lake Baikal > - Selenga 447,000 Angara > Yenisey > MN, RU Kara Sea Ob 2,972,493 Kara Sea CN, KZ, MN, RU - Irtysh 1,643,000 Ob CN, KZ, MN, RU - Tobol 426,000 Irtysh KZ, RU - Ishim 176,000 Irtysh KZ, RU 1 5,566 km2 to Lake Paanajärvi and 18,800 km2 to the White Sea. Chapter 1 WHITE SEA, BARENTS SEA AND KARA SEA 41 OULANKA RIVER BASIN1 Finland (upstream country) and the Russian Federation (downstream country) share the basin of the Oulanka River.
    [Show full text]