I m *C [Reflections “No good ever came from law. on Anarchism - p. 2 All reforms have been the off­ spring of revolution. ^ s w i o n g —HENRY T. BUCKLE. in Sicily - p. 3 to the Editors - p. 4 ANARCHIST WEEKLY

P O N o , 44 October 31st, 1959 Threepence

Party been obliged to listen to its garrulous Douglas Jay advocate in CALLING ALL SOCIALISTS! print for all to read, that it should drop nationalisation and change its p is week we again return to the in a lot of thought and action if in Trade Unions and the Labour Party.needs are Public Relations men, name, but the reappraisals of some Pjbject of the Labour Party’s the meantime they want to make So that what with the policies it advertising experts and psychologists of the other top intellectuals is T^n post-mortem we hope no some progress along the road to­ advocates and the imaginary policies (not forgetting “experts” like Mr. far from reassuring. For instance, R will infer that we are either wards the free society. ___ attributed to it by the gutter press Robert McKenzie who was busily Mr. R. H. S. Crossman (sacked |sted in resuscitating the corpse. Mr. Bcvan was quite right when to chill the spines of its gullible, carving up the Party in last Sunday’sfrom his column by the Daily Mir­ ror who have also been rethinking J offering advice on how to win he declared that the defeat of the respectable, readers, the present Observerf so that apparently, it R xt elections. But we are in- generation’s picture of is, could function better next time). their pro-Labour policy in the light Labour Party did not imply a final of a falling circulation), writing in fed in reaching the socialists rejection of socialism by the British understandably, more likeThe Pic­ More national advertising and less the 12 million people who ture of Dorian Gray than The Soul nationalisation; more Public Rela­ the New Statesman explains Lab­ electorate. Had the Labour Party our’s loss of votes in these terms: pLabour and among the 7 mil- campaigned on an uncompromisingof Man Under Socialism! tions Officers and less of the Public who didn't vote at all. And the socialist programme, it may well Ownership nonsense; more socialites In this era of Tory prosperity a p i e to try to remove illusions have lost more votes than it did. in the Party and fewer socialists! Labour opposition has to run very fast Socialism-via-the-ballot box is i t talready seems clear that the But that was not the problem, de­ Not only has the prostrate Labour W C—liaised on p. 3 [ now and not at election-time, Labour Party’s “re-thinking” will clared Mr. Bevan. The programme r though admittedly people are on which the Labour Party fought develop along two lines, at least. f. politically conscious, their the election could only be describedOn the one hand the fanatical ballot- gvity is pitifully taxed by senti- as similar to that of “pre-1914 liber­ boxers for whom winning elections 1 political loyalties, promises alism brought up to date”* has become an end in itself, on the < W o rk e rs of the W o rld . Jo f the parties on issues which other those who believe (until the eel strongly, or simply because But welcome as Mr. Bevan’s de­ next election?) that the raison d’etre TT is not easy to understand the Coloured men and women in a would bate the local Tory to claration is, the fact remains that for of the Labour Party is the imple­ X mentality which totally disre­white comunity having to compete ^ the one vote they might not a very large section of the public, mentation of socialist policies, accor­ gards the most elementary needs offor jobs against each other as well Jinst him! socialism is represented by the ding to their understanding of social­an already under-privileged group.as white labour cannot really be ex­ pected in the difficult atmosphere of t Labour leaders have got a •We quote from his article published in ism, of course! Yet the 200 workers at a factory in re-thinking to do between the Paris weekly l'Express (Oct. 16), Derbyshire now on strike to force coloured prejudice to always prac­ Re-thinking for the former will tise principles of solidarity against fad the next elections—if they which we assume to be a translation of not involve re-reading the socialist the dismissal of seven coloured the N ew s of the W orld article of Oct. such odds. But it is only in the Ho win them—equally socialists texts of Blatchford, Morris and Cole. workers are preparing to hold out 11—which unfortunately we have mis­ exercise of these principles that pre­ umcM sts will need to engage laid. For them what the Labour Party until their “black brothers” are left jobless. No complaints have been judices will be broken down and made against the men, their onlycompetition between workers elimin­ fault is in being coloured. ated. Up until last week six coloured * * * WHICH WAY IN CUBA workers were employed by Glow Quite another story is reported Worm Boilers, Ltd., who had offer­ about white and coloured relation­ BRING the last three weeks, FIree- sellers out of work, while more seriously, one set of chains for another; at worst, ed an assurance to the rest of their ships from Birmingham where 30 feoM has published an account of the Rem Laws have resulted in a with­ they will simply have one more set of ^favhiuorj *n Cuba which at the be­ employees that no additional col­drivers and warehousemen came out drawal of investment in building, andofficials living off their backs. Further­ on strike because a coloured worker a t this year resulted in the over- 80 thousand builders are without jobs. more there are alternatives which are oured labour would be employed on |a t the Batista regime and its re­ A fifth reform said to be in the air con­ worth canvassing from a libertarian work for which white labour was was dismissed, not, it is stated, for nt by the government of Fidel cerns the armed forces, but the report angle. On a small scale, any voluntary available. According to an official reasons of colour but because his The report was prepared by the remarks that replacement of Batista co-operation between neighbouring far­ of the Company, a seventh was em­ temporary job had come to an end. nan Association of Cuba, and is officers by Castro officers is more appar­ mers, any effort to set up research units, ployed as no “alternative (white) Mohammed Ghulam is so popu­ ■M. concise story of the events ent than changes in Che set-up of the or implement sharing groups, indepen­ men were available.” lar among his workmates that their ely connected with the change forces. dent of state control can be regarded as The seven men (at time of writing) actions have brought an agreement eteminent, and the realisations of All these facts are only to be expected, a step towards freedom. On the larger, new government, as seen by the in looking at the results of a revolution long term scale the anarchist way is to are still officially employed and thefrom his employers to keep him pie at libertarian sympathies who are from an anarchist point of view. The try to propagate and, demonstrate the 200 men are back at work. But until the end of the year, when the ally living in Cuba, and directlycurrent issues are, how should they be need for a revolutionary social trans­ Jack Wathall, secretary at the fac­ Union will try to find him fresh k h d by the type of government. interpreted, and what should the anar­formation, controlled by the people tory of the National Union of Stoves, work: — It is clear that from that point of view chist attitude to them and to the gov­ themselves. Yet it is impossible to Grates and General Metal Workers ‘Ghulam, who is called “Bill” by his great change for the better has taken ernment behind them be? From this advocate this at the same time as one said that: “Talks between union and workmates, had been employed as a tem­ place. For seven yean the people of point of view, it seems that the Libertar­ is urging the peasants to trust in the management can go on after our porary labourer for a year, but he was X u la have been subjected to concentrated ian Association are far more sympathetic state’s schemes for their betterment, the return, but all our members are given three weeks’ notice on Thursday. ; brutality, including arbitrary arrest, tor­ to the allegedly “•Revolutionary” gov­ state's instructions on how to increase He had become one of the most popular production, or the state's schemes for determined that the seven Coloured ture and execution, and burning of ernment than a thorough-going anarchist men here must go. Our return workers at the firm, even though he can­ houses Now this has been removed, approach would allow. Its report em­ educating them. not speak English, and Mr. Thomas although the Libertarian Association phasises that Castro and his immediate An objection to the above point of makes no difference to that view.” Budding, a Transport and General Work­ qualify this a* being "at least for the associates arc men of undoubted inte­ view is that from a peaceful position in It is even more depressing, if ers’ Union shop steward, said: ““We re­ present’ The army and police force grity, a fact which has resulted in an the British Welfare State, one cannot accounts are true, that the original gard him as one of the most helpful and are Mill in existence, with their security important clearing up of administration. fully appreciate the benefits which the six coloured men struck with the courteous of colleagues. You don't have branches under different names, and theIt cannot be slated too often, that the “‘revolutionary’’ government is bringing others when it was learned that the to ask him for help; he is always there tradition of tyranny is still sufficientlyanarchist case against giving power to to Cuba after the horrors of the last seventh, Sohan Lai, a Punjabi, was to give it.” strong that they could he used again to governments does not rest on the bad seven years. This is a quite valid point. taken on. Their own dismissal is Ghulam was a soldier for sixteen years support the Castro regime mi the ttune faith or motives of the potential govern­ On the other hand, the Welfare State now being demanded in spite ofand one of the strikers said: “He is a way as they were used by Batista, Fur­ ors, although these may be incidentally shows just how many reforms are first-rate man, who served his country thermore, "The suttr and capita lism, called into question. The fact is that brought about by factors quite irrelevant their show of “loyalty”. But what well. He has got a personal letter from with their traditional methods of the government corrupts social relationships. to the issues in which libertarians are a difficult position they were in. General Auchinleck to prove that. He wage system, private property, supply and The government’s land reform will not interested, rather than by the good works because had they not come out on endured the sufferings of a Japanese demand, prices, competition, and all themake the farmers one jot more indepen­ of slightly better governments. strike, the white workers would prisoner-of-war camp, and we feel we other means which make possible the ex­ dent or bee At best they will exchange Syndicalist . have resented them even more. owe him something",' ploitation of man by mats, are null in fnreo”. What it even mure ick. era it that there teal urn of authoritarian toriety will no doubt he touch vuunger under the new government than under Calling the old. It m * becoming ObvjflW JLh&i Oit CHINESE pnovruBi the American government wat being rouV f made vpurbed Sympathetic wanned from supporting Banua u a HOW HE ON Iff* result of the extreme deeawalueuun of hit regime, of which Use report tpeak* I Readers! Investments were being withheld There­ PROGRESS OF A DEFICIT! fore, while the Castro regime is many WEEK 43 tunc* preferable to that of Batista from the point of view of the absence of Deficit on Freedom £860 brutality, it cannot be considered a t in Contributions received £730 any way. "anap towards » libertarian goal”. DEFICIT £130 The report Uyt emphttit on several of October 16 to October 22 the reforms effected by die new govern Edinburgh: /.F . V6: Falmouth: R.W. I/-; ment. Of these, the equivalents of London: Anon, 9d.: Lc-ndna: J.Y/.A. 4/-; ““Rent Tribunals and compulsory put Lcadoa J.S.* 5/-: W olvcrhsm :-J.G.L* chase of landfot development have been 2/6: Columbus: R.A.B. 3/6: Geneva: R.LE. current in Britain rot many years, despite E1/4/0: Bristol: K.W. I/-; Ilford: M.H.S.* the absence of revolutions, It u interest 4/*: Chicago: T.B. 7/4: Orbiston: G.B. I/-. Total ... 2 14 7 ing t° note that of the others, at least Previously acknowledged ... 727 6 II two have had immediate wic effects which have brought hardship to sections 1959 TOTAL TO DATE ... £730 I 6 of the people. The laws converting the National Lottery into an Association for GIFT OF BOOKS: Hyda: F.A.G. I Savings and Housinghas put the ticket “ Sweet Dreamt, Comrade f I •Indicates regular contributor. 2 r r e if Some Reflections on Anarchism CINEMA ■pRIENDLY critics of anarchism often terms. A ‘perfect’ society, speaking aware of alternatives, than his opponents. argue that it is nothing more than generally, is not a static ideal, but rather Earlier I referred vaguely to “social Death on the Screei another belief in a millennium. Thus, a society in which the best methods are problems”. It is clear from a perusal VSTTHEN we think of censorship in anarchists are very much like certain employed for the solution (and avoid­of political literature that not everyone series of war-films. ance) of social problems. What is the plays and films we tend to think of fundamentalist sects (so goes this criti­ recognises the same problems. What is sex first and then of political and social The English film is a comedM cism) in looking forward to a perfect best method for the solution of a social theme of death has to be lightfl a pressing problem to one person may prejudice. For a change take a look at society. The origins of millennial be­ problem is, of course, a function of the — i.e., distorted. Of the eight) not seem so to another. What is and death. Oddly enough, death in literature liefs are perhaps to be traced by the possibilities (technological, psychological, what -is not a problem (or important is usually extremely unconvincing. six take place off the screen!. psychologists, but the question of origins etc.) implicit in a society. The criterion problem) is, I think, a function of what Nearly every modern author except (is if it were a Greek tragedy)! need not concern us here. The point of what is best must always be practical other two—poison and drowna is valued. To the anarchist personal Hemingway and Lawrence has been able of the criticism is that belief in a perfect success (in the long run as well as the freedom is extremely valuable. To travesties. The suicide too is off society is delusive, that the world is much short run) in solving problems. Anar­ to make sexual intercourse credible, but others it is not. Hence, the anarchist the only ones I can think of who have and the prospective hanging is 1 more recalcitrant to human desires than chists have rightly avoided drawing up joke. Any intrusion of realityL will see grave problems where personal done the same for death are Dostoy­ the anarchists believe, and that a sensible complete blueprints for the future, since liberty is threatened, while others will wreck the illusion (so beautiful)! evsky, Nabokov and Graham Greene. up) that death is funny. person will recognize this fact and de­ this would imply a static millenniarism. not. This does not mean that personal It is of course almost impossible to die velop beliefs which correspond to what However, given the anarchist view of liberty is of no value to people other convincingly on the stage; indeed, if an There could be no better correcB is possible in the way of social improve­ what constitutes social problems, this than anarchists, but that other things are actor did so, half the audience would the Polish film. A young n a j ment. The anarchist refusal to vote and caution should not lead to an avoidanceof greater value to them. There is con­ faint and the other half would throw up. assassin has to shoot a Coo otherwise take part in political affairs of all blueprints however sketchy. In siderable agreement among normal civil­ official on the day the war But the cinema screen is the one place is viewed by these critics as at best a reply to the first question, then, it would ized human beings as to what things have little Polish town; first the wrong| manifestation of an unreasonably sensi­seem that anarchism is necessarily bound where death could be really well done. are shot, then he falls in love, value. Disagreement is largely over the It hardly ever is. Consider the average tive moral sense and at worst the expres­ up with some belief in a millennium. ordering of these items. end he gets his man and is himsS sion of sheer irresponsibility. (Thus, war-film, western or thriller. Death is in the stomach. When the eldefifl^ Before replying to the second question, ‘beatniks' are commonly identified with While food, clothing, and shelter are usually instantaneous, and when it is noting official is shot, you see the? Is such a belief false? we must ask what anarchists). These criticisms raise a num­ highly valued by all, there is disagree­ it is either silent or punctuated only by holes in the back of his mackinjq ber of questions, among them, Is anar­ precisely is the content of the anarchist ment over the ranking of such items as the vital message the victim must give belief. Certainly it is not that such a he falls with his arms round the] chism necessarily millennarian? If so, love, status, freedom, knowledge, power, before the last, tactful, gasp. society is inevitable. Rather, it is that his murderer. And when the! is it for this reason unacceptable? What national prestige, private property, piety, Struggles, pain, screams, groans and all such a society is possible (and, being per­ shot you see his death-agony frtj S t » , is possible (and impossible) in society? art, order, tradition, etc. It is in his the other details that go to make our fect, desirable). As I have analysed the moment that he finds blood onh id, What is ‘reasonable’ moral sensitivity? vaiuational scale that the anarchist most exits as unpleasant as our entrances are concept of perfection, it would seem that to the last kick of his legs on ffi What is irresponsibility? differs from his opponents. It is because as tabu as sexual intercourse itself. The such a society is possible, unless it can bish dump where he screams out' The anarchist answer to the first ques­ of this that he will see problems where only convincing death I have seen in an be shown that men when confronted with others see none, andvice versa. It is Quite apart from the fantastic! tion is by no means obvious. The notion American film is the final one inBaby the direction and acting, why isl a problem inevitably choose those meth­ because of this that his ideal society will of millennium must be clarified. The Face Nelson; in an English one, Oliver’s Ashes and Diamonds is so shockij it’ ods of solution which are less successful differ from the ideal societies of his term, with its Christian apocalyptic con­ superb performance in Richard 111. impressive? Because it tells t h f l than others which are available. Since opponents, since both ends and means notations, is no doubt galling to many Otherwise death seems to be too Because death is solitary, nasjB there is no evidence for this, there is no are constitutive of one’s ‘millennial’ ex­ anarchists, yet the notion of a perfect eloquent, just and mighty for film pro­ brutish. Because we are used tefl reason for rejecting millenniarism (so pectations. It is because of this that he society, which is its core meaning, is I ducers and actors. death as the solution to the knottjT defined) as a false belief. The third is accused of having too much of a social think at the heart of anarchism. Cer­ question, What is possible (and impos­ These reflections are occasioned by an of the story, and Wajda sees it aisl tainly the anarchist must have before him conscience (or none at all). In fact, his interesting programme I saw recently at From childhood we see violence a n sible) in society? can only be answered‘irresponsibility’ lies simply in his dif­ a conception of a society which is in in the light of what are accepted as laws the Hampstead Playhouse. The two films on television and cinema screens,] » ferent scale of values. some sense perfect, in terms of which he of nature. What these laws are can best shown were Kind Hearts and Coronets often justified than not. Let’s hi criticises present institutions and prac­ be ascertained by a study of science, Some of the implications that I find andAshes and Diamonds. The subject of see it more often as Wajda sees] tices—and chooses his own courses of physical and social. in this analysis are that (1) Anarchism, each was the same—death; the treatment is. A human life is worth nothin] action. if it is to survive, must not lost sight of could hardly have been more different. Malraux, but nothing is worth a The anarchist, if he is to be called an ★ its ‘millenniarism’. (2) Anarchist criti­ On the one hand, perhaps the most per­ life. The truth of that would be! anarchist and thus set apart from other cism of existing society should be two­ fect and light-hearted of all the Ealing apparent if we were, more awarfl men, must never be a ‘piecemeal' critic of YWHAT I have said so far about anar- fold: (a) It should attack the irrational, comedies; on the other, a suitably grim the end of a human life involves*”" society. His criticisms must be governed ™ chist millenniarism would permit obscurantist approach to so many press­ third instalment of Andrzej Wajda’s biting Nl by a standard and directed toward us a to treat to some extent at least other ing social problems which is employed goal. Critics may point out that a schools of political thought as millen- by governments today. A good ground­ perfect society is in a sense a contradic­ arian as well. More must be said of the ing in the sciences is essential to the suc­ tion in terms. That is, perfection implies anarchist perfect society to distinguish cess of such an attack. (i>) It should completion, whereas society is in constant it from the perfect societies of, say, the attack the order of values of opposing The Lambeth Boys flux, constantly confronted by newCommunists or Tories. The motives of systems. To do this well the anarchist problems requiring new conceptions for political leaders may be suspect, but I should be clear about his own vaiua­ WE ARE THE LAMBETH task of changing it still remains, m tional system. He should also have a (heir solution. Society can never be think it is a mistake to impute evil BOYS. Curzon. Unfortunately this wonderful half q perfect, if it is to be society and not a motives to all politicians. Regardless of background in moral philosophy. Con­ film is in the same programme afl Platonic archetype. This criticism is motives, the public statements, of most temporary authors in this field have 'TpHIS is another film in the tradition hours of distasteful boredom in R well taken, though I think anarchists are reflective political leaders imply that they much to say about techniques for critic­ pioneered recently by the “Free Cousins”. This is advertised threq too well aware of the nature of society believe that a perfect society (so defined) ising and changing the moral attitudes Cinema” Group, in which the documen­ ingly as the first of the new wave] of others. (3) The anarchists should to be guilty of such a contradiction in is possible, provided they are elected. tary lay-out is used to investigate and French films. P.HI recognize that there are many who differ Certainly their followers believe this. portray human personality as it is ex­ The only difference between anarchism from them only slightly on moral and pressed through interesting social groups. practical questions. Those individuals and opposing doctrines at this stage in It goes a little way beyond some of the should not be ignored or castigated, but PRHDOM BOOKSHOP the discussion would be that the anar­ previous ones, in giving a more complete Letter chist keeps a comparatively open mind every effort should be made to establish picture of the lives of the Lambeth Boys, OPEN DAILY communication with them. After all, we regarding possible methods and is pre­ rather than concentrating on a particu­ (OfMM l i «um>—4.M fMB., I PUR Site) Anarchists and pared to reject traditional methods in may learn from them as they learn from lar aspect of their recreation, as did New Books . • . the light of scientific knowledge. He is; us. “Momma don’t allow” or of their work, Streetwalker 12/6 or should be, freer of dogma, more M. G. Anderson . as in “Every day except Christmas”. Elections TKe Brain-Waffeisg Machine One of its most effective techniques L Ruff 16/- CINCE misunderstanding seem to be , is that of contrast, with different situa­ Cbiftift Studies ^ widespread in the discussion of (#d') Asa Briggs 42/- tions coming into the picture through unobtrusive connecting links. The con­ voting and elections, I would like to clear TW W*f L©y$r John Her&ey 18/- up one contained in Nicolas Walter’s Reprints *nd R e v ie w trasts between the day’s work and the evening’s play, the cricket match between letter. As far as I am concerned, the CheepEditions « • • Lambeth and Mill Hill Public School; Labour Party is welcome to the votes of ] T f f dW* F. Garde Lore* 1IA Mankowitz, Osborne, and Nicolas I'm AN Right, Jeck How Can You Get