The Ukrainian Weekly, 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger. -
Crimea and the Kremlin: from Plan “A” to Plan “B”
Crimea and the Kremlin: From Plan “A” to Plan “B” Translated by Arch Tait March 2015 This article is published in English by The Henry Jackson Society by arrangement with Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. CRIMEA AND THE KREMLIN: FROM PLAN “A” TO PLAN “B” 1 Reconstructing events in east Ukraine and the rationale behind them. On 15 March, Crimea marked the first anniversary of the referendum on whether it wanted to be incorporated as Part of Russia. Shortly before,Vladimir Putin signed a decree instituting a new national holiday: SPecial OPerations Forces Day. This is to be celebrated on 27 February, the day in 2014 when the “little green men” embarked on their oPeration to seize key facilities in Crimea. The day before the announcement, Russian television aired a film titled “Crimea: the Path Back to the Homeland”, in which Putin describes taking the decision to begin the oPeration to annex the Peninsula. For all that, certain details about the oPeration and the Russian president’s motives remain obscure. We could do worse than get the answer to the question of why Putin decided to seize Crimea from the horse’s mouth, from Putin’s own sPeeches. He had listed his grievances at some length in a sPeech in the Kremlin on 18 March 2014. Not for the first time, he blamed the United States for “destroying the world order” and, in his view, stage-managing a whole succession of “coloured” revolutions. His main comPlaint was about NATO’s eastward expansion, “moving uP military infrastructure to our borders.” Because of this, he argued, “we have every reason to believe that the notorious Policy of containment of Russia, Pursued in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries, continues to this day. -
The “Humanitarian Dimension” of Russian Foreign Policy TOWARD GEORGIA, Moldova, Ukraine, and the Baltic States
THe “HUMANITARIAN DIMENSION” OF RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, UKRAINE, AND THE BALTIC StATES The 2nd, supplementary edition Riga, 2010 EDK: 327(470) The 2nd, supplementary edition Hu 451 This book is work of six think tanks from Baltic States, Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Centre for East European Policy Studies (Latvia) had a leading role in the im- plementation of this research project. Contributors include the International Centre for Defence Studies (Estonia), the Centre for Geopolitical Studies (Lithuania), the School for Policy Analysis at the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (Ukraine), the Foreign Policy Association of Moldova (Moldova), and the International Centre for Geopolitical Studies (Georgia). The research project was implemented with the support of the Konrad Ad- enauer Foundation and of the East - East: Partnership Beyond Borders Program of the Soros Foundation – Latvia. Editor: Gatis Pelnēns Project Director: Andis Kudors Authors of the study: Juhan Kivirähk, Nerijus Maliukevičius, Dmytro Kon- dratenko, Olexandr Yeremeev, Radu Vrabie, Nana Devdariani, Mariam Tsatsanash- vili, Nato Bachiashvili, Tengiz Pkhaladze, Gatis Pelnēns, Andis Kudors, Mārtiņš Pa- parinskis, Ainārs Dimants, Ainārs Lerhis. English translation editor: Rihards Kalniņš Design of the cover and layout: Toms Deģis © Authors of the study (text), 2010 © Centre for East European Policy Studies, International Centre for Defence Studies, Centre for Geopolitical Studies, School for Policy Analysis at the National university of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Foreign Policy Association of Moldova, Interna- tional Centre for Geopolitical Studies, 2010 © SIA Apgāds Mantojums (design concept), 2010 ISBN: 978-9984-39-989-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface to Second Edition . 8 4.4.2. Russian Support of Compatriots Living in Lithuania . -
Prokhorova L Hryshko S Nepsha O.Pdf
1 2 Innovative Approaches to Ensuring the Quality of Education, Scientific Research and Technological Processes Edited by Magdalena Gawron-Łapuszek Yana Suchukova Series of monographs Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Applied Arts Katowice School of Technology Monograph 43 Publishing House of University of Technology, Katowice, 2021 3 Editorial board : Michał Ekkert – PhD, Vice-Dean for Student Affairs, University of Technology, Katowice Magdalena Gawron-Łapuszek – PhD, University of Technology, Katowice Tetyana Nestorenko – Professor WST, PhD, Associate Professor, Berdyansk State Pedagogical University (Ukraine) Aleksander Ostenda – Professor WST, PhD, University of Technology, Katowice Yana Suchikova – DSc, Professor, Berdyansk State Pedagogical University (Ukraine) Magdalena Wierzbik-Strońska – mgr., University of Technology, Katowice Reviewers: Igor BOGDANOV – Head of Berdyansk State Pedagogical University, Doctor of Education, Professor; Gennady SHISHKIN – Professor of the Department of Physics and Methods of Teaching Physics at BSPU, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, associate professor Nadiya DUBROVINA – PhD, CSc., Associate Professor, School of Economics and Management in Public Administration in Bratislav Series of monographs Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Applied Arts University of Technology, Katowice Monograph · 43 The authors bear full responsible for the text, quotations and illustrations Copyright by University of Technology, Katowice, 2021 ISBN 978 – 83 – 957298 – 6 – 7 Editorial compilation Publishing -
Country Report Estonia an Entry Point Into the EU Labour Market
Co-funded by the European Union FONDAZIONE ISMU INIZIATIVE E STUDI SULLA MULTIETNICITÀ Country Report Estonia An Entry Point into the EU Labour Market by Tiit Tammaru , Eneli Kindsiko, Kristina Kallas, Rebekka Vedina, Kristiina Kamenik and Maaja Vadi 2015 1 Co-funded by the European Union COUNTRY REPORT ESTONIA An Entry Point into the EU Labour Market By Tiit Tammaru (country co-ordinator), Eneli Kindsiko, Kristina Kallas, Rebekka Vedina, Kristiina Kamenik and Maaja Vadi University of Tartu Estonia Country Report – An Entry Point into the EU Labour Market 2 Estonia Country Report – An Entry Point into the EU Labour Market 3 Co-funded by the European Union The European approach to immigration is traditionally characterized by a sort of “schizophrenia”, generated by the attempt to keep together two contradictory philosophies: the “economicistic” philosophy on which the system of entry (and stay) is regulated and the philosophy of solidarity and equal opportunities. To overcome this paradox, three major changes are necessary: shifting from the perception of migrants as contingently instrumental resources to the conception of their human capital as a structural resource for the economic and social development of European societies by exploiting their skills, knowledges and competences (hereafter SKC); promoting a wider awareness, among different types of organizations (profit, non-profit and public), of the importance and potentialities of Diversity Management strategies; improving the social participation and the civic and voluntary engagement of Third Country Nationals (hereafter TCNs) in view of the construction of an inclusive European society and in order to change the common perception of immigrants as people needing to be helped and assisted. -
Euromosaic III Touches Upon Vital Interests of Individuals and Their Living Conditions
Research Centre on Multilingualism at the KU Brussel E U R O M O S A I C III Presence of Regional and Minority Language Groups in the New Member States * * * * * C O N T E N T S Preface INTRODUCTION 1. Methodology 1.1 Data sources 5 1.2 Structure 5 1.3 Inclusion of languages 6 1.4 Working languages and translation 7 2. Regional or Minority Languages in the New Member States 2.1 Linguistic overview 8 2.2 Statistic and language use 9 2.3 Historical and geographical aspects 11 2.4 Statehood and beyond 12 INDIVIDUAL REPORTS Cyprus Country profile and languages 16 Bibliography 28 The Czech Republic Country profile 30 German 37 Polish 44 Romani 51 Slovak 59 Other languages 65 Bibliography 73 Estonia Country profile 79 Russian 88 Other languages 99 Bibliography 108 Hungary Country profile 111 Croatian 127 German 132 Romani 138 Romanian 143 Serbian 148 Slovak 152 Slovenian 156 Other languages 160 Bibliography 164 i Latvia Country profile 167 Belorussian 176 Polish 180 Russian 184 Ukrainian 189 Other languages 193 Bibliography 198 Lithuania Country profile 200 Polish 207 Russian 212 Other languages 217 Bibliography 225 Malta Country profile and linguistic situation 227 Poland Country profile 237 Belorussian 244 German 248 Kashubian 255 Lithuanian 261 Ruthenian/Lemkish 264 Ukrainian 268 Other languages 273 Bibliography 277 Slovakia Country profile 278 German 285 Hungarian 290 Romani 298 Other languages 305 Bibliography 313 Slovenia Country profile 316 Hungarian 323 Italian 328 Romani 334 Other languages 337 Bibliography 339 ii PREFACE i The European Union has been called the “modern Babel”, a statement that bears witness to the multitude of languages and cultures whose number has remarkably increased after the enlargement of the Union in May of 2004. -
The Ukrainian Weekly, 2019
INSIDE: l Canada set to recognize Tatar deportation as genocide – page 7 l Review: At The Ukrainian Museum’s film festival – page 9 l Ribbon-cutting highlights renovations at Bobriwka – page 17 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association, Inc., celebrating W its 125th anniversaryEEKLY Vol. LXXXVII No. 26-27 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 30 -JULY 7, 2019 $2.00 Ukrainian delegation bolts, Ukrainian Day advocacy event held in Washington Zelenskyy ‘disappointed’ as PACE reinstates Russia RFE/RL’s Ukrainian Service Ukraine’s delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) has walked out in pro- test and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has voiced his “disappointment” over Russia having its voting rights reinstalled at the body after a three-year hiatus. In a June 25 statement on his Facebook page, President Zelenskyy said he tried to convince French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in separate meetings to not allow Russia back into Europe’s main human rights body until it meets PACE’s demands on adherence to princi- ples of rule of law and human rights. Ukrainian Day participants at the breakfast briefing session. “It’s a pity that our European partners didn’t hear us and acted differently,” Mr. Zelenskyy said of the lop- and a former co-chair of the Congressional Ukrainian sided vote from the Council of Europe’s 47 member On the agenda: Russia sanctions, Caucus, delivered observations from the perspective of states, where only 62 of the 190 delegates present energy security, occupation of Crimea, Congress. “Members of Congress highly value and appreci- ate the efforts of their constituents to visit Washington, opposed a report that made it possible for Russia to continued U.S. -
In Estonia and Latvia the Influence of EU Conditionality and Russia's Activism on M
Understanding the “Conditionality Gap” in Estonia and Latvia The Influence of EU Conditionality and Russia’s Activism on Minority Inclusion By Jennie Schulze B.A. 2001, Boston College A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 31, 2009 Dissertation directed by James G. Goldgeier Professor of Political Science and International Relations The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Jennie Schulze has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of July 2, 2009. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Understanding the “Conditionality Gap” in Estonia and Latvia The Influence of EU Conditionality and Russia’s Activism on Minority Inclusion Jennie Schulze Dissertation Research Committee: James G. Goldgeier, Professor of Political Science and International Relations, Dissertation Director Henry H. Hale, Associate Professor of Political Science and International Relations, Committee Member Zsuzsa Csergo, Associate Professor of Political Studies, Queen’s University, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2009 by Jennie Schulze All rights reserved iii Acknowledgements This dissertation could not have been completed without generous funding from several institutions. Pre-dissertation grants from the American Consortium on EU Studies and the Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES) were crucial for the early development of the dissertation project. Generous support for field research in Estonia and Latvia was provided by an EU Marie Curie grant in conjunction with The Integration of the European Second Generation (TIES) project. -
Downloads/Assets/201503 BP Russian Forces in Ukraine Kostyuchenko, “We Were Fully Aware of What We Brought Ourselves to FINAL.Pdf.And What Could Happen,” Op Cit
HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT Putin's War in Ukraine By Maksymilian Czuperski, John Herbst, Eliot Higgins, Alina Polyakova, and Damon Wilson © 2015 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN: 978-1-61977-996-9 Cover photo credit: Reuters/Marko Djurica. Pro-Russian rebels stand on top of a burnt-out Ukrainian personnel carrier near the village of Novokaterinovka in eastern Ukraine, September 24, 2014. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. May 2015 ATLANTIC COUNCIL HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT REPORT TEAM Maksymilian Czuperski Special Assistant to the President, Atlantic Council John Herbst Director, Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council and former US Ambassador to Ukraine Eliot Higgins Founder, Bellingcat and Visiting Research Associate, Department of War Studies, King’s College London Alina Polyakova Associate Director, Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council Damon Wilson Executive Vice President, Programs -
STATEMENT by MR. ALEXANDER LUKASHEVICH, PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION, at the 1233Rd MEETING of the OSCE PERMANENT COUNCIL
The OSCE Secretariat bears no responsibility for the content of this document PC.DEL/705/19 and circulates it without altering its content. The distribution by OSCE 20 June 2019 Conference Services of this document is without prejudice to OSCE decisions, as set out in documents agreed by OSCE participating States. ENGLISH Original: RUSSIAN Delegation of the Russian Federation STATEMENT BY MR. ALEXANDER LUKASHEVICH, PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, AT THE 1233rd MEETING OF THE OSCE PERMANENT COUNCIL 20 June 2019 On the situation in Ukraine and the need to implement the Minsk agreements Mr. Chairperson, The situation in Ukraine remains discouraging. The Ukrainian authorities are still not taking practical steps to establish peace in the east of the country. In Donbas the shooting continues. The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM) has reported further casualties and destruction of civilian infrastructure. The level of tension remains unchanged and there has been an increase in the use of weapons prohibited by the Minsk agreements. An analysis of SMM data in those cases when the Mission was able to identify which side was responsible for the shooting shows that since 10 June the number of violations of the ceasefire regime by the Ukrainian armed forces has been many times higher than the corresponding figure for the militia. The Ukrainian security forces continue their tactic of a “creeping offensive” in what is known as the “grey zone”, provoking military tension. For example, on 12 June Nazar Ilnitsky, press officer of the 24th Mechanized Brigade of the Ukrainian armed forces, announced that soldiers from the brigade had entrenched themselves in new positions in Marinka. -
Estonia's Third Report
Strasbourg, 13 April 2010 ACFC/SR/III(2010)006 THIRD REPORT SUBMITTED BY ESTONIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 13 April 2010 ESTONIA’S THIRD REPORT ON IMPLEMENTING THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES 2010 Part I The Republic of Estonia signed the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (hereinafter the Framework Convention) on 2 February 1995 and it entered into force in respect of Estonia on 1 February 1998. The second State Report was submitted on 13 July 2004, and the recommendations arising from it are also covered in this Report. The Council of Europe Advisory Committee (hereinafter the Advisory Committee) delegation was on a visit to Estonia from 30 November to 2 December 2004. The Committee met with the representatives of the Government and the Riigikogu, NGOs and other experts with the aim to obtain information about the implementation of the requirements of the Convention in Estonia. The opinion of the Advisory Committee in respect of Estonia was adopted on 24 February 2005. The Council of Europe Committee of Ministers passed the decision on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities in Estonia on 15 February 2006. In accordance with the Committee of Ministers decision ACFC/III(2008)001, Part I of the Report covers mostly the aspects relating to implementation of the second report and the issues of drawing up the report. Part II with reference to specific articles covers in more detail the projects carried out during the reporting period. -
Fog of Falsehood: Russian Strategy of Deception and the Conflict in Ukraine
FIIA REPORT 45 Fog of Falsehood Russian Strategy of Deception and the Conflict in Ukraine Katri Pynnöniemi & András Rácz (eds.) FIIA REPORT 45 Fog of Falsehood Russian Strategy of Deception and the Conflict in Ukraine Fog of Falsehood Russian Strategy of Deception and the Conflict in Ukraine Katri Pynnöniemi & András Rácz (eds.) ULKOPOLIITTINEN INSTITUUTTI UTRIKESPOLITISKA INSTITUTET THE FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS FIIA rePort 45 Reports can be ordered from the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. +358 9 432 7707 [email protected] All FIIA reports and other publications are also available on our website at www.fiia.fi. Language editing: Anna Sinkkonen (chapters 1-4), Aakkosto Oy (chapters 5-14) Graphic design: Nordenswan & Siirilä Oy / Tuomas Kortteinen Layout: Kaarina Tammisto Printed by Grano Oy, 2016 The Finnish Institute of International Affairs Ulkopoliittinen instituutti PL 400 00161 Helsinki Finland www.fiia.fi ISBN 978-951-769-485-8 (print) ISBN 978-951-769-486-5 (web) ISSN 2323-5454 The Finnish Institute of International Affairs is an independent research institute that produces high-level research to support political decision-making and public debate both nationally and internationally. All manuscripts are reviewed by at least two other experts in the field to ensure the high quality of the publications. In addition, publications undergo professional language checking and editing. The responsibility for the views expressed ultimately rests with the authors. Acknowledgements The research process for this report started in early summer of 2014 in the form of informal discussion on how to better understand Russia’s strategic communication concerning the conflict in Ukraine.