Prisoners of the Kremlin, the Test of Russia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prisoners of the Kremlin, the Test of Russia PRISONERS OF THE KREMLIN, OR THE TEST OF RUSSIA 240 years IN TOTAL ALL PRISONERS HAVE BEEN SENTENCED "Ukrainian Subversives" 1st Wave 2nd Wave 3rd Wave 1,8 3,6 Yevhen Andriy Redwan years Volodymyr Oleksiy Volodymyr Oleksiy year Hlib Panov Zakhtey Suleymanov Prysych Bessarabov Dudka Stohniy Shabliy Cases of Crimean Tatars The Yalta Case Emir-Usain Vadym Enver Muslim Arsen Refat Kuku Siruk Bekirov Aliyev Jepparov Alimov The Tabligi Jamaat Case The Simferopol Case Zevri Rustem Ramsey Enver Teymur Uzeur Aider Emil Rustem Abseitov Abiltarov Memetov Mamutov Abdullaev Abdullaev Saledinov Dzhemedenov Ismailov The Tabligi Jamaat Case The February 26 Case Arsen Renat Taliat Seyran Ali Mustafa Kurbedinov Suleymanov Abdurakhmanov Mustafaev Asanov Dehermanjee The New Bakhchysarai Case Suleiman Timur Server Seyran Memet Ernest Asanov Ibragimov Zekeryaev Saliyev Belyalov Ametov The Journalist’s Case The Activist’s Case The Euromaidan Activists Case 2,6 3,7 9 Mykola years of Volodymyr years Mykola years Semena conditional sentence Balukh Shyptur Cases whose political motivation is being checked Temporarily Occupied Crimea AT LEAST 39 prisoners Hennadiy Dmytro Anna under all-day home arrest Lymeshko Dolhopolov Sukhonosova «Spy Cases» The Crimean Case 11 12 20 10 7 Valentyn years Viktor years Oleh years Oleksandr years Oleksiy years Vyhivskyi Shur Sentsov Kolchenko Chirnyi (Kirovo-Chepetsk) (Brjansk) (Labyntnahi) (Kopeisk) (Unknown whereabouts) «Persecution of Journalists» «The Chechen Case» «Chastisers» Case 22,6 20 8,6 Roman Mykola years Stanislav years Serhiy years Sushchenko Karpyuk Klykh Lytvinov (Moscow) (Vladimir) (Verkhniouralsk) (Bataisk) Spy Case The Sevastopol Case 3 15 5 5 5 Volodymyr years Ruslan years Ferat years Rustem years Nuri years Prysych Zeytullaev Sayfullaev Vaitov Primov (Krasnodar) (Salavat) (Omutninsk) (Kurhan) (Republic of Mari El) "Euromaidanivtsi" New Cases 3,6 10 12 Oleksandr years Andriy years Mykola Oleksiy years Pavlo Oleksandr Kostenko Kolomiets Dadeu Syzonovych Hryb Shumkov (Kirovo-Chepetsk) (Krasnodar Territory) Krasnodar (Rostov-on-Don) (Krasnodar) (Brjansk) Brjansk Moscow Labyntnahi Vladimir Omutninsk Kirovo-Chepetsk Bataisk Republic of Mari El Rostov-on-Don Kopeisk Krasnodar Salavat Kurhan Verkhneuralsk Russia AT LEAST 20 prisoners As of mid-October 2017, at least 58 Ukrainian citizens are being kept under arrest in the territory of Russia and occupied Crimea for political reasons. These are people of different nationalities, During 2017, there have been at least religions, professions and political views. 18 new detentions, which, according to the Journalists, activists, farmers, miners, human rights community, have signs of directors, teachers and students are among political persecution. Such arrests mostly them. Most of them are active in the social take place in Crimea. and political life and openly express their position, some of them just turned up not at The Investigation Committee and the the right time and not at the right place. Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation are persecuting «the Kremlin’s prisoners» for fabricated charges in common criminal cases, as well as the application of so-called anti-extremist and anti-terrorist legislation, the purpose of which in this case 32 is to prosecute all dissenting persons. For of them are example, one can be sentenced to 5 years of imprisonment for stating publicly that Crimean Tatars Crimea is Ukraine. The allegations used by Russian and occupational investigative bodies -- the Investigative Committee and the Federal out of Security Service -- range from common 21 58 criminal ones to purely political such as convicting of making a public statement have already been sentenced about the occupation of Crimea by Russia. Usually, however, this means the use of in occupational Crimean so-called anti-extremist and anti-terrorist legislation by Russia. and / or Russian courts In fact, those people are hostages. And cases against them are used by Russia mainly for propaganda campaigns and discrediting 1.5 22.5 Ukraine. The presence of «the Kremlin’s prisoners,» years of deprivation of freedom as human rights activists call them, in places of deprivation of freedom in Russia and Crimea is characterized by gross violation of their rights. BEATINGS, CRUEL TREATMENT AND TORTURE OF «THE KREMLIN’S PRISONERS» Many of the detainees are subject to pressure, Since Russian or occupational authorities both physical and psychological, especially at are trying to conceal the victims of torture, it the early stages of the investigation, when the is rarely possible to document the relevant law enforcement tries to make them confess to traces on the body. But in the cases of Stanislav their guilt. Klikh, Renat Paralamov, Yevhen Panov and Oleksandr Kostenko, the defence has evidence At least 12 people, as they and their lawyers which indicate that those persons have been say, were subjected to cruel torture. tortured. The occupational authorities and the In most cases, the names of those who authorities of the Russian Federation refuse to committed beatings and torture remain investigate those tortures, practically admitting unknown. They also cannot be recognized their involvement in those violations. because security officials, as a rule, put on balaclavas for such a «delicate work». As often as not, methods of illegal physical influence include beatings, electric current, and strangulation. Among the psychological ones are threats to relatives, assurances that «Ukraine has rejected you», pressure and humiliation of dignity in various forms. VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL In all cases of «the Kremlin’s prisoners,» In general, the court and the prosecutor’s the right to a fair trial is violated one way or office act together as the prosecution. another. Such violations point out the illegal politically motivated persecution. There is by definition no independent justice in annexed Crimea due to the very terms of occupation. In its October 2017 resolution, the European Parliament listed Crimean «courts» also resort to retrospective 47 names, calling them «de application of the law -- they investigate and sentence in connection with events that had facto political prisoners.» taken place before Crimea was occupied. In spite of the prohibition to the occupant to Відверта фальсифікація матеріалів справи apply its own criminal law in occupied territories, Brutal falsification of case files -- even making up established in international humanitarian law, names of victims, straw witnesses unconvincing it is exactly what Russia resorts to in Crimea, witnesses to the search and unconvincing for example, by holding people criminally affiants, the evidence base manipulation and responsible for membership in organizations fake evidence planting, the unequal approach not prohibited in Ukraine. to assessing arguments of the defense and the prosecution…-- these are «normal methods» of Russian justice. LIMITED RIGHT TO PROTECTION AND PROSECUTION OF LAWYERS AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS In the cases of «the Kremlin’s prisoners» are the last bastion of protection for the there is a systematic practice of limiting the Kremlin’s prisoners; their role can hardly be right to protection as well as lawyers’ access to overestimated, and that is why some of them defendants. are being persecuted in connection with their In general, few independent lawyers activities. ILLEGAL RELOCATION FROM THE OCCUPIED TERRITORY OF CRIMEA TO THE TERRITORY OF THE OCCUPYING STATE This large-scale offense, which can be to the agreement between the Ukrainian and qualified as a war crime, has been lasting in Russian Human Rights Commissioners in early Crimea since the occupation. 2017, 16 convicted Ukrainian citizens were transferred from Crimea to the mainland to The process of relocating convicted Ukrainian serve the sentence for the first time in three citizens from Crimean places of deprivation of years of occupation. freedom to Russian ones is not voluntary but is violently carried out. After being convicted, Ukrainian prisoners are usually taken to Siberia or Trans-Ural. Some prisoners protest against such Despite the fact that the practice of the European relocation by causing injuries to themselves, Court of Human Rights prescribes detaining a but such forms of protest are ignored by Russia. convict as close as possible to his or her place of According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of residence, when it comes to political cases, the Ukraine, it is about several hundred people; Russian authorities do the exact opposite – they according to human rights defenders, this send prisoners thousands of miles away from figure amounts to several thousands. Owing their homes. 2 1 «The February 26 Case» «Ukrainian Activist» Ali Asanov Volodymyr Balukh Mustafa Dehermanjee 2 3 «The Crimean Case» «Spy Cases» Oleh Sentsov Valentyn Vyhivskyi Oleksandr Kolchenko Viktor Shur Oleksiy Chirnyi 1 9 «Chastisers» «Ukrainian Subversives» Serhiy Lytvinov Yevhen Panov Andriy Zakhtey Redwan Suleymanov Volodymyr Prysych 3 Dmytro Shtyblykov Oleksiy Bessarabov “Euromaidan Activists” Volodymyr Dudka Andriy Kolomiets Oleksiy Stohniy Oleksandr Kostenko Hlib Shabliy Mykola Shyptur 19 «The Hizb ut-Tahrir Case» Rustem Vaitov Enver Bekirov Emil Dzhemedenov Nuri (Yuriy) Primov Refat Alimov Zevri Abseitov Ruslan Zeytullaev Arsen Jepparov Ramsey Memetov Ferat Sayfullaev Teymur Abdullaev Rustem Abiltarov Muslim Aliyev Rustem Ismailov Enver Mamutov Vadym Siruk Uzeur Abdullaev Emir-Usain Kuku Aider Saledinov 2 3 Cases whose political
Recommended publications
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimea and the Kremlin: from Plan “A” to Plan “B”
    Crimea and the Kremlin: From Plan “A” to Plan “B” Translated by Arch Tait March 2015 This article is published in English by The Henry Jackson Society by arrangement with Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. CRIMEA AND THE KREMLIN: FROM PLAN “A” TO PLAN “B” 1 Reconstructing events in east Ukraine and the rationale behind them. On 15 March, Crimea marked the first anniversary of the referendum on whether it wanted to be incorporated as Part of Russia. Shortly before,Vladimir Putin signed a decree instituting a new national holiday: SPecial OPerations Forces Day. This is to be celebrated on 27 February, the day in 2014 when the “little green men” embarked on their oPeration to seize key facilities in Crimea. The day before the announcement, Russian television aired a film titled “Crimea: the Path Back to the Homeland”, in which Putin describes taking the decision to begin the oPeration to annex the Peninsula. For all that, certain details about the oPeration and the Russian president’s motives remain obscure. We could do worse than get the answer to the question of why Putin decided to seize Crimea from the horse’s mouth, from Putin’s own sPeeches. He had listed his grievances at some length in a sPeech in the Kremlin on 18 March 2014. Not for the first time, he blamed the United States for “destroying the world order” and, in his view, stage-managing a whole succession of “coloured” revolutions. His main comPlaint was about NATO’s eastward expansion, “moving uP military infrastructure to our borders.” Because of this, he argued, “we have every reason to believe that the notorious Policy of containment of Russia, Pursued in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries, continues to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimean Human Rights Situation Review
    e-mail: [email protected] website: crimeahrg.org CRIMEAN HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION REVIEW May 2018 The monitoring review was prepared by the Crimean Human Rights Group on the basis of materials collected in May 2018 Follow the link, to read Follow the link, to read monthly monitoring reviews of the thematic reviews and articles of the Crimean Human Rights Group Crimean Human Rights Group Crimean Human Rights Situation Review May 2018 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 2 2. CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS .................................................................................................. 3 Prohibition of torture ......................................................................................................................... 3 Politically motivated criminal prosecution .................................................................................... 4 The сase Of Sentsov, Kolchenko, Afanasiev, Chirnii .......................................................... 4 «February 26 case» ..................................................................................................................... 4 «Case of Crimean Muslims» .................................................................................................... 4 «Ukrainian saboteurs’ case» ...................................................................................................... 6 Volodymyr Balukh’s case ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ja Yhteistyöjärjestön Suomen Valtuuskunnan Kertomus
    EUROOPAN TURVALLISUUS- JA YHTEISTYÖJÄRJESTÖN PARLAMENTAARISEN YLEISKOKOUKSEN SUOMEN VALTUUSKUNNAN KERTOMUS ETYJ:n parlamentaarisen yleiskokouksen toiminnasta vuonna 2017 K 9/2018 vp EUROOPAN TURVALLISUUS- JA YHTEISTYÖJÄRJESTÖN SUOMEN VALTUUSKUNNAN KERTOMUS ETYJ:n parlamentaarisen yleiskokouksen toiminnasta vuonna 2017 HELSINKI 2018 ISSN 1798-4785 1 EUROOPAN TURVALLISUUS- JA YHTEISTYÖJÄRJESTÖN PARLAMENTAARISEN YLEISKOKOUKSEN Suomen valtuuskunta Eduskunnalle Eduskunnan työjärjestyksen 10 §:n mukaisesti Euroopan turvallisuus- ja yhteistyöjärjestön parlamentaari- sen yleiskokouksen Suomen valtuuskunta antaa kunnioittaen eduskunnalle kertomuksen ETYJ:n parla- mentaarisen yleiskokouksen toiminnasta vuoden 2017 istuntokaudella. Helsingissä, 14. helmikuuta 2018 ETYJ:n parlamentaarisen yleiskokouksen Suomen valtuuskunnan puolesta Aila Paloniemi puheenjohtaja Gunilla Carlander sihteeri 2 SISÄLLYSLUETTELO 1. Tiivistelmä.................................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Valtuuskunnan toiminta ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Pohjoismaiden ja Baltian maiden välinen yhteistyö ............................................................................ 8 3. Yleiskokouksen emerituspuheenjohtaja Kanervan toiminta ................................................................... 10 4. Yleiskokouksen kokoukset ja kannanotot...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Violations of Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Religion by the Russian Federation As the Occupying Power in Crimea
    Evhen Tsybulenko Anastassiya Platonova Violations of Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Religion by the Russian Federation as the Occupying Power in Crimea Evhen Tsybulenko TalTech Law School, Tallinn University of Technology Akadeemia tee 3, Tallinn 12618, Estonia E-mail: [email protected] Anastassiya Platonova Miller & Company Law Firm Lasnamäe 4b, Tallinn 11412, Estonia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Considering modern weaponization of media and extensive experience of Russia in employing the propaganda machine, further attacks and trespasses against the freedom of expression and freedom of religion in order to suppress dissent in the occupied territory are to be expected. In accordance with the reports of international organizations and non-governmental organizations, the current situation in Crimea after the occupation with regard to human rights protections is concerning. This article will put together the reported events in Crimea and the city of Sevastopol concerning the freedom of expression and freedom of religion in order to demonstrate the gravity of the situation and responsibility of the occupying power. Keywords: abuses of fundamental rights and freedoms, Crimea, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, human rights, IHL, occupation, Russia, Russian aggression, Ukraine 134 doi: 10.1515/bjes-2019-0026 BalticBaltic JournalJournal ofof EuropeanEuropean StudiesStudies TallinnTallinn UniversityUniversity ofof TechnologyTechnology (ISSN(ISSN 2228-0588),2228-0588), Vol.Vol. 9,9, No.No. 33 (28)(28) Violations of Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Religion by the Russian Federation as the Occupying Power in Crimea 1. Introduction Russian control of the Crimean Peninsula has been addressed and defined multiple times by major international actors as a temporary occupation of the Ukrainian territory.
    [Show full text]
  • World Boxing Association Gilberto Mendoza
    WORLD BOXING ASSOCIATION GILBERTO MENDOZA PRESIDENT OFFICIAL RATINGS AS OF NOVEMBER 2010 th th Based on results held from November 17 , 2010 to December 16 , 2010 MEMBERS CHAIRMAN Edificio Ocean Business Plaza, Ave. JOSE OLIVER GOMEZ E-mail: [email protected] BARTOLOME TORRALBA (SPAIN) Aquilino de la Guardia con Calle 47, JOSE EMILIO GRAGLIA (ARGENTINA) Oficina 1405, Piso 14 VICE CHAIRMAN Cdad. de Panamá, Panamá ALAN KIM (KOREA) Phone: + (507) 340-6425 GEORGE MARTINEZ E-mail: [email protected] GONZALO LOPEZ SILVERO (USA) Web Site: www.wbanews.com HEAVYWEIGHT (Over 200 Lbs / 90.71 Kgs) CRUISERWEIGHT (200 Lbs / 90.71 Kgs) LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT (175 Lbs / 79.38 Kgs) World Champion: DAVID HAYE U.K. World Champion: GUILLERMO JONES PAN World Champion: BEIBUT SHUMENOV KAZ Won Title: 11-07-09 Won Title: 09-27-08 Won Title: 01-29-10 Last Mandatory: 04-03-10 Last Mandatory: 10-02-10 Last Mandatory: 07-23-10 Last Defense: 11-13-10 Last Defense: 10-02-10 Last Defense: 07-23-10 INTERIM CHAMPION: STEVE HERELIUS FRA WBC:VITALY KLITSCHKO- IBF:WLADIMIR KLITSCHKO IBF: STEVE CUNNINGHAM - WBO: MARCO HUCK WBC: JEAN PASCAL - IBF: TAVORIS CLOUD WBO : WLADIMIR KLITSCHKO WBC: KRZYSZTOF WLODARCZYK WBO: JURGEN BRAEHMER 1. RUSLAN CHAGAEV (OC) UZB 1. ALEXANDER FRENKEL GER 1. GABRIEL CAMPILLO (OC) SPA 2. DENNIS BOYTSOV (WBA I/C) RUS 2. YOAN PABLO HERNANDEZ CUB 2. ZOLT ERDEI HUN 3. ALEXANDER POVETKIN RUS 3. ALI ISMAILOV (PABA) AZE 3. VYACHESLAV UZELKOV UKR 4. ALEXANDER USTINOV (EBA) RUS 4. LATEEF KAYODE NIG 4. DAWID KOSTECKI POL 5. HASIM RAHMAN USA 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Prokhorova L Hryshko S Nepsha O.Pdf
    1 2 Innovative Approaches to Ensuring the Quality of Education, Scientific Research and Technological Processes Edited by Magdalena Gawron-Łapuszek Yana Suchukova Series of monographs Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Applied Arts Katowice School of Technology Monograph 43 Publishing House of University of Technology, Katowice, 2021 3 Editorial board : Michał Ekkert – PhD, Vice-Dean for Student Affairs, University of Technology, Katowice Magdalena Gawron-Łapuszek – PhD, University of Technology, Katowice Tetyana Nestorenko – Professor WST, PhD, Associate Professor, Berdyansk State Pedagogical University (Ukraine) Aleksander Ostenda – Professor WST, PhD, University of Technology, Katowice Yana Suchikova – DSc, Professor, Berdyansk State Pedagogical University (Ukraine) Magdalena Wierzbik-Strońska – mgr., University of Technology, Katowice Reviewers: Igor BOGDANOV – Head of Berdyansk State Pedagogical University, Doctor of Education, Professor; Gennady SHISHKIN – Professor of the Department of Physics and Methods of Teaching Physics at BSPU, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, associate professor Nadiya DUBROVINA – PhD, CSc., Associate Professor, School of Economics and Management in Public Administration in Bratislav Series of monographs Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Applied Arts University of Technology, Katowice Monograph · 43 The authors bear full responsible for the text, quotations and illustrations Copyright by University of Technology, Katowice, 2021 ISBN 978 – 83 – 957298 – 6 – 7 Editorial compilation Publishing
    [Show full text]
  • Neonazis & Euromaidan
    Stanislav Byshok Alexey Kochetkov NEONAZIS & EUROMAIDAN From democracy to dictatorship [Second edition] 2014 Stanislav Byshok, Alexey Kochetkov NEONAZIS & EUROMAIDAN. From democracy to dictator- ship. [Second edi on]. “Whoever is not jumping is a Moskal” is a chant that women and men of diff erent ages who took to Kiev Independence Square in win- ter 2013-2014 repeated trying to get warm. They kept jumping and laughing, for nobody in the ‘brave new world’ of the Ukrainian revo- lu on under Stepan Bandera’s banner fancied gaining the character of a staunch enemy of Ukrainian statehood. Mass demonstra ons of “angry ci zens” in Ukraine had objec ve reasons. This was a protest against ineff ec ve and corrupt govern- ment, against police and bureaucra c abuse of power, against unclear and dead-end policies of the President and the Government. All na onal libera on movements use the popular ideas and po- li cal sen ments that dominate the society as their posi ve mani- festo. Thus, exclusively le -wing ideologies were mainstream in the Russian Empire in 1917, radical Islamism was most popular in Arab countries during the Arab spring of 2012, whereas na onalism, also radical, turned mainstream in the Ukraine of 2013-2014. The book describes the development of Ukraine’s na onal- ist groups since 1991 un l present day. It focuses on the history of the parliamentary right-wing radical Svoboda party and the non- parliamentary Right Sector movement. The authors study the ideol- ogy, psychology and methods of poli cal struggle of these structures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2019
    INSIDE: l Canada set to recognize Tatar deportation as genocide – page 7 l Review: At The Ukrainian Museum’s film festival – page 9 l Ribbon-cutting highlights renovations at Bobriwka – page 17 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association, Inc., celebrating W its 125th anniversaryEEKLY Vol. LXXXVII No. 26-27 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 30 -JULY 7, 2019 $2.00 Ukrainian delegation bolts, Ukrainian Day advocacy event held in Washington Zelenskyy ‘disappointed’ as PACE reinstates Russia RFE/RL’s Ukrainian Service Ukraine’s delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) has walked out in pro- test and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has voiced his “disappointment” over Russia having its voting rights reinstalled at the body after a three-year hiatus. In a June 25 statement on his Facebook page, President Zelenskyy said he tried to convince French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in separate meetings to not allow Russia back into Europe’s main human rights body until it meets PACE’s demands on adherence to princi- ples of rule of law and human rights. Ukrainian Day participants at the breakfast briefing session. “It’s a pity that our European partners didn’t hear us and acted differently,” Mr. Zelenskyy said of the lop- and a former co-chair of the Congressional Ukrainian sided vote from the Council of Europe’s 47 member On the agenda: Russia sanctions, Caucus, delivered observations from the perspective of states, where only 62 of the 190 delegates present energy security, occupation of Crimea, Congress. “Members of Congress highly value and appreci- ate the efforts of their constituents to visit Washington, opposed a report that made it possible for Russia to continued U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting B8-0288/2018 12.6.2018 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 135 of the Rules of Procedure on Russia, notably the case of Ukrainian political prisoner Oleg Sentsov (2018/2754(RSP)) Charles Tannock, Karol Karski, Roberts Zīle, Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Ruža Tomašić, Jan Zahradil, Jadwiga Wiśniewska eon behalf of the ECR Group RE\P8_B(2018)0288_EN.docx PE621.686v01-00 EN United in diversity EN B8-0288/2018 European Parliament resolution on Russia, notably the case of Ukrainian political prisoner Oleg Sentsov (2018/2754(RSP)) The European Parliament, - having regard to its previous resolutions on Russia, temporarily occupied Crimea in Ukraine and on Eastern Ukraine, - having regard to the Council decisions continuing the sanctions imposed on the Russian Federation in relation to the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula, - having regard the Geneva Convention relative to the Prosecution of Civilian Persons in Time of War, - having regard to the Report ‘Situation of human rights in the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)’ of 25 September 2017 of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, - having regard to article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, both of which provide that no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and to which Russian Federation is a party, - having regard to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, - having regard to Rule 135 of its Rules of Procedure, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE NAME Christopher Todd Bastian ADDRESS PHONE Department of Ag & Appl. Economics Work: (307) 766-4377 Dept. 3354 1000 E. University Ave. Laramie, WY 82071 EDUCATION 2004 Doctor of Philosophy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. Dissertation Title: Using Random Utility Models to Incorporate Substitution When Estimating Economic Values and Impacts of Closing a Unique Recreation Site: The Case of Snowmobiling in Yellowstone 1990 Master of Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY Thesis Title: An Analysis of the Interrelationships Between Cash and Futures Prices in the Discovery of Price for Feeder Cattle. 1987 Bachelor of Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2017-present Professor, Ag & Appl. Economics, University of Wyoming 2013-present Recipient-UW College of Ag. & Nat. Res., Lowham Research Endowment 2010-2017 Associate Professor, Ag & Appl. Economics, University of Wyoming 2005-2010 Assistant Professor, Ag & Appl. Economics, University of Wyoming 2005-2009 Affiliate Faculty, Ag & Resource Economics, Colorado State University 2003-2005 Senior Extension Educator, Ag & Appl. Economics, University of Wyoming 1998-2003 Assoc. Extension Educator, Ag & Appl. Economics, University of Wyoming 1993-1998 Asst. Extension Educator, Agricultural Economics, University of Wyoming 1991-1993 Research Associate/Lecturer, Agricultural Economics, University of Wyoming 1990-1991 Lecturer, Agricultural Economics, University of Wyoming OTHER POSITIONS 1988 Management Trainee, First Wyoming Bank, Rawlins, Wyoming JOB DESCRIPTION 2005 - 2016 50% Teaching 45% Research 5% Service CURRENT JOB DESCRIPTION – SPRING 2018 - PRESENT 42% Teaching 14% Advising 32% Research 12% Service SCHOLARSHIP SUMMARY 1 PUBLICATIONS/PAPERS PRESENTED/SYMPOSIA/GRANTS Co-author on 1 book. Single Author on 1 book chapter. Primary or Co-author on 2 book chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • World Boxing Association Gilberto Mendoza President
    WORLD BOXING ASSOCIATION GILBERTO MENDOZA PRESIDENT OFFICIAL RATINGS AS OF AUGUST 2010 th rd Based on results held from August 05 , 2010 to September 03 , 2010 MEMBERS CHAIRMAN Edificio Ocean Business Plaza, Ave. BARTOLOME TORRALBA (SPAIN) JOSE OLIVER GOMEZ E-mail: [email protected] Aquilino de la Guardia con Calle 47, JOSE EMILIO GRAGLIA (ARGENTINA) Oficina 1405, Piso 14 VICE CHAIRMAN ALAN KIM (KOREA) Cdad. de Panamá, Panamá GONZALO LOPEZ SILVERO (USA) Phone: + (507) 340-6425 GEORGE MARTINEZ E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.wbanews.com HEAVYWEIGHT (Over 200 Lbs / 90.71 Kgs) CRUISERWEIGHT (200 Lbs / 90.71 Kgs) LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT (175 Lbs / 79.38 Kgs) World Champion: DAVID HAYE U.K. World Champion: GUILLERMO JONES PAN World Champion: BEIBUT SHUMENOV KAZ Won Title: 11-07-09 Won Title: 09-27-08 Won Title: 01-29-10 Last Mandatory: Last Mandatory: 04-03-10 Last Mandatory: 07-23-10 Last Defense: 04-03-10 Last Defense: Last Defense: 07-23-10 INTERIM CHAMPION: STEVE HERELIUS FRA WBC: VITALY KLITSCHKO- IBF:WLADIMIR KLITSCHKO IBF: STEVE CUNNINGHAM - WBO: MARCO HUCK WBC: JEAN PASCAL - IBF: TAVORIS CLOUD WBC: KRZYSZTOF WLODARCZYK WBO: WLADIMIR KLITSCHKO WBO: JURGEN BRAEHMER 1. RUSLAN CHAGAEV (OC) UZB 1. VALERY BRUDOV (OC) RUS 1. GABRIEL CAMPILLO (OC) SPA 2. NICOLAY VALUEV RUS 2. ALEXANDER FRENKEL GER 2. CHRIS HENRY USA 3. DENNIS BOYTSOV (WBA I/C) RUS 3. ENZO MACCARINELLI U.K. 3. ALEKSY KUZIEMSKI (EBA) POL 4. ALEXANDER USTINOV (EBA) RUS 4. YOAN PABLO HERNANDEZ CUB 4. VYACHESLAV UZELKOV UKR 5. ODLANIER SOLIS (LAC) CUB 5. FRANCISCO PALACIOS P.R.
    [Show full text]