DOCSLIB.ORG

Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger. These vulnerable areas are therefore the focus of this study. The so-called ‘grey zone’ or ‘security zone’ appeared as the result of efforts aimed at resolving the armed conflict triggered by instability in Ukraine, and Russian policy in the territory of Ukraine’s Luhansk and Donetsk regions. Following the Maidan demonstrations, the collapse of the government in Kyiv, and after the Russian Federation’s illegal annexation of Crimea, the epicentre of violence shifted to the Donbass in the spring of 2014. As of July 2017, military operations of variable intensity in the east of Ukraine continue. International experts record not only military assistance to the local armed forces from Russia, but also massive shelling from its territory.4 There is also return shelling from the Ukrainian side into non-government controlled areas. In January 2017, according to Stepan Poltorak, the Minister of Defence of Ukraine, there were about 40,000 members of illegal armed formations in the Donbass, of whom 5,000 are career officers in the regular Russian Armed Forces. According to the United Nations, by 15 May 2017, at least 10,090 people had been killed, 23,966 injured, and more than 1,600,000 forced to move out of the conflict zone. According to the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine, the Ukrainian militaries have borne 2,696 casualties and 9,903 wounded as of 16 June 2017. Ukraine’s Donetsk and Luhansk regions are densely populated. The population of the Donetsk region is estimated to be 4,234,300 as of 1 May 2017, while that of the Luhansk region is 2,192,100 as of 1 April 2017. Conflict in these densely populated areas has resulted in a decrease in the average population density by 20.2%. Regional infrastructure has been destroyed as a result of the war. According to expert estimates, most of the damage is to residential buildings and the energy, water, and heating systems. The total losses in the Donetsk region alone exceed 1.25 billion Ukrainian hryvnia (UAH).5 At the same time, a significant part of the social infrastructure and major industrial enterprises have remained in territory uncontrolled by Ukraine. Military fighting, population flight as a result of these hostilities, the influence of information from the Russian Federation and from occupied areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions (ORDLO), and the loss of economic potential, have had a particularly negative effect on the Donbass in general, and particularly on communities living in the government-controlled territories near the line of contact. 1 The line of contact is a conditional delineation between the uncontrolled and government-controlled territories 2 The government-controlled territory is understood as being the territory where the Anti-Terrorist Operation is being carried out, and where the state authorities fully exercise their powers established by Ukraine’s legislation (the temporary procedure for monitoring the movement of people across the contact line within the Donetsk and Luhansk regions is approved by the Anti-Terrorist Centre under the Security Service of Ukraine) 3 The temporarily uncontrolled territory is the territory where the Ukrainian authorities temporarily do not exercise their powers. 4 Putin’s undeclared war: summer 2014 – Russian artillery strikes against Ukraine, Bellingcat, 2016 https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-and- europe/2016/12/21/russian-artillery-strikes-against-ukraine 5 National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Review of the Donbass: Assessment of socio-economic losses and priority areas of government policy, 2015, http://nbuviap.gov.ua/images/nauk-mon/Vidrodgennya_Donbasu.pdf 4 The Ukrainian government has taken steps to address the humanitarian, social, and economic problems in the territories under its control. The programme on ‘Measures to restore the Donbass’ was adopted by Cabinet Resolution No. 1002 on 16 October 2014.6 These measures mainly focused on restoring damaged infrastructure. On 20 April 2016, the Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Territories and Internally Displaced Persons (MTOT) was established on the basis of the State Agency for the Restoration of the Donbass and the State Service for the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol. On 31 August 2016, the government of Ukraine approved the concept of the state targeted programme ‘Restoration and development of peace in the eastern regions of Ukraine.’ The document detailed the policy along the demarcation line in the territories controlled by the Ukrainian authorities, and stated that the policy of reconstruction was (at that time) unsystematic, while the main areas of financing were not defined. Three main areas of activity were prioritised: • To restore critical infrastructure and the social services sector, including energy, transportation, water supply and drainage facilities. There were also plans to reinstate education, healthcare, and social security institutions. • To support small and medium-sized businesses. • To develop civil society in the region, and rebuild confidence and peace.7 On 11 January 2017, the Cabinet of Ministers approved the Action Plan for the implementation of principles of state domestic policy in certain districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions where the state authorities do not currently exercise their powers. The Action Plan has provided for measures to combat corruption, to address infrastructure issues, and to increase trust in communities (activities in the field of education and medical care). Nevertheless, it is difficult today to identify the problem-free implementation of all these measures, because the effectiveness of Ukraine’s politics is hampered by the uncoordinated actions of the state apparatus, a lack of proper financing, and military action in the region. In 2016, a large amount of funds transferred to the special fund of the budgets of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in July (UAH 3.8 billion) was practically not used, despite the acute need for restoring infrastructure and housing. The reason for this, in the opinion of experts, was the unjustified centralisation of project management.8 There is a need for the full reintegration of the government-controlled territories into Ukraine, the solution of social and humanitarian problems, and the strengthening of confidence-building measures inside and outside the Donbass. A policy is also required for communication with citizens residing in the non-government controlled territories, though full reintegration will only be possible after security problems are solved, separatist forces disbanded, Russian troops removed, and the region demilitarised. Among the main problems of concern to citizens residing in the government-controlled territories near the contact line were the following four components: • Security problems; • Receiving social and administrative services, and problems around the reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs); • Lack of drinking water and electricity, and problems of medical care; • Socio-economic problems typical for the whole of Ukraine, but aggravated in the conflict zone (unemployment, the high costs of utilities, and corruption). 6 Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, On the action plan to organise restoration of damaged (ruined) social and transportation infrastructure objects, residential buildings and utilities provision systems in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, No. 1002, 2014, http:// zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1002-2014-%D1%80 7 The peace initiative: How the government is going to restore Donbass, RBC-Ukraine, 31 August 2016, https://daily.rbc.ua/rus/show/mirnaya- initsiativa-pravitelstvo-sobiraetsya-1472640150.html, accessed 4 September 2017
Recommended publications
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018

    Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018

    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
  • Minsk II a Fragile Ceasefire

    Minsk II a Fragile Ceasefire

    Briefing 16 July 2015 Ukraine: Follow-up of Minsk II A fragile ceasefire SUMMARY Four months after leaders from France, Germany, Ukraine and Russia reached a 13-point 'Package of measures for the implementation of the Minsk agreements' ('Minsk II') on 12 February 2015, the ceasefire is crumbling. The pressure on Kyiv to contribute to a de-escalation and comply with Minsk II continues to grow. While Moscow still denies accusations that there are Russian soldiers in eastern Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly admitted in March 2015 to having invaded Crimea. There is mounting evidence that Moscow continues to play an active military role in eastern Ukraine. The multidimensional conflict is eroding the country's stability on all fronts. While the situation on both the military and the economic front is acute, the country is under pressure to conduct wide-reaching reforms to meet its international obligations. In addition, Russia is challenging Ukraine's identity as a sovereign nation state with a wide range of disinformation tools. Against this backdrop, the international community and the EU are under increasing pressure to react. In the following pages, the current status of the Minsk II agreement is assessed and other recent key developments in Ukraine and beyond examined. This briefing brings up to date that of 16 March 2015, 'Ukraine after Minsk II: the next level – Hybrid responses to hybrid threats?'. In this briefing: • Minsk II – still standing on the ground? • Security-related implications of the crisis • Russian disinformation
  • Iom Ukraine Covid-19 Response. Report #9

    Iom Ukraine Covid-19 Response. Report #9

    IOM UKRAINE COVID-19 RESPONSE Report 9 (15 March 2021) Photo: IOM / Artem Getman FROM MASKS TO DEFIBRILLATORS: IOM AND JAPAN PROVIDE CRUCIAL EQUIPMENT TO HOSPITALS AND ENTRY-EXIT CROSSING POINTS IN EASTERN UKRAINE Five first-line hospitals in conflict- guards have also received much-needed affected Donetsk and Luhansk regions “In 2020, the SBGS personnel personal protective equipment and of Ukraine as well as five entry-exit registered almost 3 million people disinfectants, provided by IOM and crossing points (EECPs) at the contact at the entry-exit crossing points,” funded by Japan. line received much-needed equipment said Serhii Deineko, the Head of the from IOM. Assistance was delivered at State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. Medical facilities* serving as primary the end of February with funding from “We are grateful to our international health-care providers for conflict-affected the Government of Japan. partners for their continued valuable population and persons crossing the support to Ukraine and Ukrainian contact line received modern medical To better equip the EECPs staff for citizens, especially those who equipment as requested by them: reacting to health emergencies, including have to cross the contact line. The 3 patient monitors, 2 portable oxygen life-threatening ones, IOM provided received medical equipment will concentrators, 2 electrocardiographs, 5 defibrillators, 25 resuscitation kits, improve the EECPs’ ability to assist a biochemical analyser, a sterilization 25 contactless thermometers and people,” said the Head of the SBGS. unit, a binocular microscope, an infusion 5 digital blood pressure monitors, with pump, a Holter monitor, a ventilator a total worth of USD 51,000, to the He added that previously, within the for non-invasive and invasive lung State Border Guard Service (SBGS) of framework of the project to prevent ventilation, 150 infrared thermometers, Ukraine.
  • Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018

    Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018

    Mental health in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts - 2018 1 Content List of abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 6 3. RESUME .................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH .................................................. 13 5. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AMONG THE PEOPLE LIVING IN DONETSK AND LUHANSK OBLASTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 А. Detecting the traumatic experience .................................................................................................... 16 B. Prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety disorder, excess alcohol consumption. ........ 18 C. Prevalence of mental health problems among the inner circle of the respondents .......................... 27 D. Indicators of mental well-being .......................................................................................................... 27 6. ACCESS TO ASSISTANCE WHEN SUFFERING FROM
  • Lysychansk City Profile Eastern Ukraine 2019 DOWNLOAD

    Lysychansk City Profile Eastern Ukraine 2019 DOWNLOAD

    LYSYCHANSK CITY PROFILE 2019 GOOD GOVERNANCE Lysychansk 15 cities* 7.1 TRUST IN MAYOR OR 1.6 HEAD OF THE TOWN TRUST IN TOWN 2.2 ADMINISTRATION 2.4 2.3 TRUST IN POLICE 3.5 PERCEIVED LEVEL ACCOUNTABILITY UKRAINIAN OF CORRUPTION OF AUTHORITIES AUTHORITIES CARE TRUST IN OBLAST STATE 3.0 Feeling that authorities ADMINISTRATION represent citizens’ concerns and views, TRUST IN 76 % of citizens in Lysychansk believe equally care about all NON-GOVERNMENTAL 5.0 parliamentarians, judges, and prosecutors parts of Ukraine and are ORGANIZATIONS can be bribed. ready to listen 0 2 4 6 8 10 Recommended initiatives to strengthen trust in local authorities could focus on transparent communication of their actions to increase accountability and responsiveness to citizens’ needs. Promote activities connecting citizens and their local administration to raise awareness about reforms, available public services, and anti- corruption initiatives. COMMUNITY BONDS SOCIAL PROXIMITY Accepting members of different socio-demographic groups as their close friends and colleagues Lysychansk 15 cities* PEOPLE FROM 6.4 EASTERN UKRAINE SOCIAL PROXIMITY CONFIDENCE THAT IDPS 5.7 PEOPLE FROM 5.8 DIFFERENT GROUPS WILL LISTEN PEOPLE LIVING 5.2 IN THE NGCA CONTACT WITH 2.4 DIFFERENT GROUPS PEOPLE FROM 5.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 WESTERN UKRAINE PRO-EU 5.0 MEDIA CONSUMPTION ORIENTED PEOPLE INFORMATION ATO/JFO MILITARY CONSUMPTION FROM 6.7 5.0 PERSONNEL FRIENDS AND FAMILY ONLINE MEDIA 5.3 PRO-RUSSIA 4.4 CONSUMPTION ORIENTED PEOPLE 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 Media consumption in Lysychansk is among the lowest People in Lysychansk feel the lowest social proximity across all 15 cities.
  • Russia's Hybrid Warfare

    Russia's Hybrid Warfare

    Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No. 105 – November 2014 Russia’s Hybrid Warfare Waging War below the Radar of Traditional Collective Defence by H. Reisinger and A. Golts1 “You can’t modernize a large country with a small war” Karl Schlögel The Research Division (RD) of the NATO De- fense College provides NATO’s senior leaders with “Ukraine is not even a state!” Putin reportedly advised former US President sound and timely analyses and recommendations on current issues of particular concern for the Al- George W. Bush during the 2008 NATO Summit in Bucharest. In 2014 this liance. Papers produced by the Research Division perception became reality. Russian behaviour during the current Ukraine convey NATO’s positions to the wider audience of the international strategic community and con- crisis was based on the traditional Russian idea of a “sphere of influence” and tribute to strengthening the Transatlantic Link. a special responsibility or, stated more bluntly, the “right to interfere” with The RD’s civil and military researchers come from countries in its “near abroad”. This perspective is also implied by the equally a variety of disciplines and interests covering a 2 broad spectrum of security-related issues. They misleading term “post-Soviet space.” The successor states of the Soviet conduct research on topics which are of interest to Union are sovereign countries that have developed differently and therefore the political and military decision-making bodies of the Alliance and its member states. no longer have much in common. Some of them are members of the European Union and NATO, while others are desperately trying to achieve The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the this goal.
  • TRUTH TELLERS the First Journalists to Write About the Holodomor

    TRUTH TELLERS the First Journalists to Write About the Holodomor

    TRUTH TELLERS The first journalists to write about the Holodomor Rhea Clyman The First Western Journalist to Expose the Holodomor WHOA talented, young, fearless, self-taught Canadian reporter with a disability. Rhea Clyman (1904–1981) was a ground-breaking female journalist who became a foreign news correspondent at a time RHEA CLYMAN when it was almost unheard of for women to do so. Born Rachel Gertrude Clyman in Poland in 1904 1904-1981 (which was then a part of the Russian Empire), she moved to Toronto 2 years later with her poor immigrant Jewish family. At the age of 6, she lost part of her leg in a streetcar accident. The villages were WHAT Rhea Clyman became the first western strangely forlorn and journalist to witness and report on the starvation in deserted... The houses Ukraine, making a journey by car in September 1932 were empty, the doors through the agricultural heartland of the Soviet Union (USSR) during the Holodomor. She previously spent flung wide open, the a month travelling in the Soviet Far North, where she roofs were caving in... encountered Ukrainians who had fled from famine conditions in their homeland or who had been exiled and were being ruthlessly exploited as slave labour. When we had passed Her accounts of her two trips were published in 44 ten, fifteen of these feature articles in the Toronto Telegram newspaper villages I began to between September 1932 to June 1933. Of these, 21 were front-page stories. understand. These were the homes of WHEN She arrived in Moscow in late December 1928.
  • Daily Report 185/2021 10 August 20211

    Daily Report 185/2021 10 August 20211

    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 185/2021 10 August 20211 Summary In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded 28 ceasefire violations, including one explosion. In the previous 24 hours, it recorded 116 ceasefire violations in the region. In Luhansk region, the Mission recorded no ceasefire violations. In the previous 24 hours, it recorded 75 ceasefire violations. The SMM followed up on reports of a man injured due to shelling in government-controlled Krasnohorivka, Donetsk region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. It recorded ceasefire violations inside the disengagement area near Petrivske. The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to a localized ceasefire to enable the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. The Mission continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at four entry-exit checkpoints and three corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM visited a border crossing point outside government control and monitored areas near the border with the Russian Federation in Donetsk region. The SMM monitored a gathering in Kyiv. The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at three checkpoints of the armed formations in southern Donetsk. Its unmanned aerial vehicles again experienced instances of GPS signal interference.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 9 August 2021. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons.
  • Ukraine Resolution on Mariupol.Pdf (23.08

    Ukraine Resolution on Mariupol.Pdf (23.08

    DAV15155 S.L.C. 114TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION S. RES. ll Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the January 24, 2015, attacks carried out by Russian-backed rebels on the civilian population in Mariupol, Ukraine, and the provision of lethal and non-lethal military assistance to Ukraine. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES llllllllll Mr. JOHNSON (for himself and Mrs. SHAHEEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on llllllllll RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the January 24, 2015, attacks carried out by Russian-backed rebels on the civilian population in Mariupol, Ukraine, and the provision of lethal and non-lethal military assistance to Ukraine. Whereas Russian-backed rebels continue to expand their cam- paign in Ukraine, which has already claimed more than 5,000 lives and generated an estimated 1,500,000 refu- gees and internally displaced persons; Whereas, on January 23, 2015, Russian rebels pulled out of peace talks with Western leaders; DAV15155 S.L.C. 2 Whereas, on January 24, 2015, the Ukrainian port city of Mariupol received rocket fire from territory in the Donetsk region controlled by rebels; Whereas, on January 24, 2015, Alexander Zakharchenko, leader of the Russian-backed rebel Donetsk People’s Re- public, publicly announced that his troops had launched an offensive against Mariupol; Whereas Mariupol is strategically located on the Sea of Azov and is a sea link between Russian-occupied Crimea and Russia, and could be used to form part of a land bridge between Crimea and
  • List of Persons and Entities Under EU Restrictive Measures Over the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine

    List of Persons and Entities Under EU Restrictive Measures Over the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine

    dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN List of persons and entities under EU restrictive measures over the territorial integrity of Ukraine List of Persons Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 1. Sergey Valeryevich DOB: 26.11.1972. Aksyonov was elected 'Prime Minister of Crimea' in the Crimean 17.3.2014 AKSYONOV, Verkhovna Rada on 27 February 2014 in the presence of pro-Russian POB: Beltsy (Bălţi), gunmen. His 'election' was decreed unconstitutional by the acting Sergei Valerievich now Republic of Ukrainian President Oleksandr Turchynov on 1 March 2014. He actively AKSENOV (Сергей Moldova lobbied for the 'referendum' of 16 March 2014 and was one of the co- Валерьевич signatories of the ’treaty on Crimea´s accession to the Russian AKCëHOB), Federation’ of 18 March 2014. On 9 April 2014 he was appointed acting Serhiy Valeriyovych ‘Head’ of the so-called ‘Republic of Crimea’ by President Putin. On 9 AKSYONOV (Сергiй October 2014, he was formally ‘elected’ 'Head' of the so-called 'Republic Валерiйович Аксьонов) of Crimea'. Aksyonov subsequently decreed that the offices of ‘Head’ and ‘Prime Minister’ be combined. Member of the Russia State Council. 1/83 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 2. Rustam Ilmirovich DOB: 15.8.1976 As former Deputy Minister of Crimea, Temirgaliev played a relevant role 17.3.2014 TEMIRGALIEV in the decisions taken by the ‘Supreme Council’ concerning the POB: Ulan-Ude, ‘referendum’ of 16 March 2014 against the territorial integrity of Ukraine. (Рустам Ильмирович Buryat ASSR He lobbied actively for the integration of Crimea into the Russian Темиргалиев) (Russian SFSR) Federation.
  • NRC: Profiling of IDP Situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine

    NRC: Profiling of IDP Situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine

    ProfilingAnnual of IDP situation Report in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-drivenfrom approach the toBoard durable solutions 2019 Acknowledgements NRC would like to thank NRC staff and Mr. Petr Kostohryz, JIPS staff, members of the Techni- cal Working Group and the Advisory Group, Luhansk State Regional Administration, in partic- ular the Social Protection Department, Prof. Volodymyr Sarioglo, Analytical Center Sociocon- sulting, NGO Stabilisation Support Services, Luhansk Regional IDP Council. List of Abbreviations CSO Civil Society Organisation GCA Government-Controlled Area (includes any government-controlled area in Ukraine not limited to Luhansk or Donetsk regions) GDP Gross Domestic Product IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP Internally Displaced Person JIPS Joint IDP Profiling Service NGCA Non-Government Controlled Area NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NRC Norwegian Refugee Council SME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise SSS NGO Stabilisation Support Services UAH Ukrainian Hryvnia UN United Nations Profiling of IDP situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-driven approach to durable solutions 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ...............................................................4 2. Introduction .......................................................................5 3. Methodology ......................................................................7 4. Limitations ........................................................................7 5. International Standards and National Frameworks on Durable Solutions
  • Alarmed by Civilian Deaths from Rocket Attacks in Ukraine, Under-Secretary-General, in Security Council Briefing, Calls for Rebels to Reinstate Ceasefire Agreement

    Alarmed by Civilian Deaths from Rocket Attacks in Ukraine, Under-Secretary-General, in Security Council Briefing, Calls for Rebels to Reinstate Ceasefire Agreement

    26 January 2015 SC/11753 Alarmed by Civilian Deaths from Rocket Attacks in Ukraine, Under-Secretary-General, in Security Council Briefing, Calls for Rebels to Reinstate Ceasefire Agreement 7368th Meeting (PM) Security Council Meetings Coverage Expressing alarm over the high civilian death toll in Ukraine of recent days, along with the shelling of the city of Mariupol, the top United Nations political affairs official called on the rebels to “recommit to the ceasefire and back down from their offensive” in an emergency Security Council meeting this afternoon. “In just five days since we last met on 21 January, close to 50 civilians have been killed and nearly 150 have been seriously injured,” Jeffrey Feltman, Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, said at a meeting requested by Ukraine, less than a week after a full Council briefing on the situation (see Press Release SC/11746). He reiterated that the Minsk ceasefire must be immediately restored, “with the onus particularly on the rebels”. At the same time, he expressed hope that the negotiating mechanism known as the Trilateral Contact Group, consisting of the European Union, the United States, Ukraine and the Russian Federation, could soon renew efforts to implement the broader Minsk accords. Noting that the rebel announcement of withdrawal from the ceasefire on 23 January was accompanied by threats to seize further territory and a boycott of future “consultations” with negotiating mechanisms, he said that it was a violation of their commitments under the Minsk accords signed in September, under which the nominal truce had been declared. He called on them to abide by their commitments.