DOCSLIB.ORG

Lysychansk City Profile Eastern Ukraine 2019 DOWNLOAD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lysychansk City Profile Eastern Ukraine 2019 DOWNLOAD LYSYCHANSK CITY PROFILE 2019 GOOD GOVERNANCE Lysychansk 15 cities* 7.1 TRUST IN MAYOR OR 1.6 HEAD OF THE TOWN TRUST IN TOWN 2.2 ADMINISTRATION 2.4 2.3 TRUST IN POLICE 3.5 PERCEIVED LEVEL ACCOUNTABILITY UKRAINIAN OF CORRUPTION OF AUTHORITIES AUTHORITIES CARE TRUST IN OBLAST STATE 3.0 Feeling that authorities ADMINISTRATION represent citizens’ concerns and views, TRUST IN 76 % of citizens in Lysychansk believe equally care about all NON-GOVERNMENTAL 5.0 parliamentarians, judges, and prosecutors parts of Ukraine and are ORGANIZATIONS can be bribed. ready to listen 0 2 4 6 8 10 Recommended initiatives to strengthen trust in local authorities could focus on transparent communication of their actions to increase accountability and responsiveness to citizens’ needs. Promote activities connecting citizens and their local administration to raise awareness about reforms, available public services, and anti- corruption initiatives. COMMUNITY BONDS SOCIAL PROXIMITY Accepting members of different socio-demographic groups as their close friends and colleagues Lysychansk 15 cities* PEOPLE FROM 6.4 EASTERN UKRAINE SOCIAL PROXIMITY CONFIDENCE THAT IDPS 5.7 PEOPLE FROM 5.8 DIFFERENT GROUPS WILL LISTEN PEOPLE LIVING 5.2 IN THE NGCA CONTACT WITH 2.4 DIFFERENT GROUPS PEOPLE FROM 5.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 WESTERN UKRAINE PRO-EU 5.0 MEDIA CONSUMPTION ORIENTED PEOPLE INFORMATION ATO/JFO MILITARY CONSUMPTION FROM 6.7 5.0 PERSONNEL FRIENDS AND FAMILY ONLINE MEDIA 5.3 PRO-RUSSIA 4.4 CONSUMPTION ORIENTED PEOPLE 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 Media consumption in Lysychansk is among the lowest People in Lysychansk feel the lowest social proximity across all 15 cities. Develop interventions promoting towards different socio-demographic and political media content created by/with local famous people that groups. Invest in initiatives focusing on constructive highlight citizens’ sense of pride (e.g. Nature, cuisine) interaction towards building mutual understanding while promoting social tolerance and diversity. and respect. * CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, Kramatorsk, Lysychansk, Sloviansk, Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, Starobilsk, Popasna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, Melitopol, Berdyansk. Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city). among 15 cities among 15 cities LOCALITY SATISFACTION SATISFACTION WITH CITY LIFE (in terms of jobs, leisure activities 4.6 5.8 and raising children) Lysychansk 15 cities* PROVISION OF INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY & SECURITY HEALTH SECURITY Access and affordability 5.6 of medical services POLITICAL SECURITY Freedom to express 4.9 political opinions ECONOMIC SECURITY Being able to provide 4.6 for your family ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY 4.5 Satisfied with the state of environment and air quality PERSONAL SECURITY Feeling safe on the streets 4.2 and protected by the police 0 2 4 6 8 10 92 % of citizens in Lysychansk are not satisfied with the quality of the road network. 76 % of citizens in Lysychansk think that utility services are not provided efficiently. Citizens’ assessment of the infrastructure services (i.e. utilities, road network, public transport) in Lysychansk is among the lowest in the region. Interventions improving infrastructure and facilitating leisure opportunities (i.e. family friendly municipal initiatives, green spaces) would help increase people’s satisfaction with their locality. PRIDE IN YOUR LOCALITY To boost pride in locality, prioritize When you think about your locality, to what extent are you proud of the following? interventions that strengthen com- PRIDE IN munity bonds, support communi- FAMOUS PEOPLE 7.4 LOCALITY (OVERALL) ty initiatives to improve feeling of safety, and focus on developing cor- NATURE 7.1 5.6 6.2 porate social responsibility within industry and production. HOSPITALITY 6.7 CIVIC BEHAVIOUR CUISINE 6.5 To change 40 % ACTIVE TRADITIONS 6.3 things in your Willing to use political and social means community you of action without violence are... CULTURAL HERITAGE 6.0 5 % VIOLENT Willing to use violence CREATIVITY 6.0 55 % PASSIVE Not willing to do anything COMMUNITY BONDS 4.6 SAFETY 3.1 Support grass-roots initiatives to empower passive AND SECURITY citizens to become more engaged. Guide constructive INDUSTRY AND 2.5 engagement among active citizens to pre-empt frus- PRODUCTION trations and grievances turning into violent action. 0 2 4 6 8 10 * CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, Kramatorsk, Lysychansk, Sloviansk, Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, Starobilsk, Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE Popasna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, Melitopol, Berdyansk. among 15 cities among 15 cities A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city). City profiles are part ofthe SCORE for Eastern Ukraine 2019 project funded by the USAID, implemented by the Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development (SeeD), and in partnership with the UN Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme. The contents of this research do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government or UN. For more information, please visit www.scoreforpeace.org.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211 Summary The SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations in Donetsk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 42 ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission recorded 40 ceasefire violations in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded five ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske, and again saw containers inside and near the southern edge of the area near Zolote. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable operation and maintenance of critical civilian infrastructure and a transfer of funds. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at five entry- exit checkpoints and two corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations near Bezimenne and on a road near non- government-controlled Korsun, Donetsk region.* Ceasefire violations2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 9 February 2021. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational, and weather conditions limited the observational capabilities of some of the other SMM cameras. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations, including nine explosions (five undetermined and four outgoing, all of undetermined weapons), which occurred in areas on the north-western edge of Horlivka (non-government-controlled, 39km north-east of Donetsk) and near the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) (15km north of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 123/2021 29 May 2021 1
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 123/2021 29 May 2021 1 Summary • In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded 383 ceasefire violations, including 77 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 91 ceasefire violations in the region. • In Luhansk region, the Mission recorded 32 ceasefire violations, including three explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded two ceasefire violations in the region. • The SMM followed up on reports of a girl injured due to an explosion of a signal cartridge in Sievierodonetsk, Luhansk region. • The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske and recorded ceasefire violations inside the area near Petrivske. • The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable the operation, cleaning and repairs of critical civilian infrastructure. • The Mission continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at four entry- exit checkpoints and the corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. • The SMM freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations in the western part of Donetsk city. Its unmanned aerial vehicles again experienced instances of GPS signal interference.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions 4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 28 May 2021. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded 383 ceasefire violations, including 77 explosions (including 74 undetermined explosions, two airbursts and one impact).
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH Only
    SEC.FR/876/20 29 December 2020 OSCE+ ENGLISH only THEMATIC REPORT CHECKPOINTS ALONG THE CONTACT LINE: CHALLENGES CIVILIANS FACE WHEN CROSSING 1 November 2019 - 15 November 2020 December 2020 1 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2020 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 4 Introduction 7 Chapter 1: Legislative and regulatory developments 9 Measures taken at the entry-exit checkpoints (EECP) and at the corresponding checkpoints of the 9 armed formations amid the COVID-19 outbreak (16 March to 10 June 2020) Regulatory developments following the partial reopening of the EECPs and of the corresponding check- 10 points (10 June to 15 November 2020) Other developments 12 Chapter 2: Impact on civilians of the freedom of movement restrictions and of the crossing requirements 14 after the partial reopening of the EECPs and the corresponding checkpoints Impact of freedom of movement restrictions on access to rights and services 14 Partial reopening of the EECPs and corresponding checkpoints, and burden of crossing requirements 18 on civilians Chapter 3: Opening of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge and construction works near Zolote and Shchas- 22 tia Opening of the renovated section of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge 22 Construction and works near Shchastia and Zolote 22 Conclusion 26 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Crucial aspects of the lives of civilians in the conflict-affected areas of eastern Ukraine depend on their ability to cross the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Persons and Entities Under EU Restrictive Measures Over the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine
    dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN List of persons and entities under EU restrictive measures over the territorial integrity of Ukraine List of Persons Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 1. Sergey Valeryevich DOB: 26.11.1972. Aksyonov was elected 'Prime Minister of Crimea' in the Crimean 17.3.2014 AKSYONOV, Verkhovna Rada on 27 February 2014 in the presence of pro-Russian POB: Beltsy (Bălţi), gunmen. His 'election' was decreed unconstitutional by the acting Sergei Valerievich now Republic of Ukrainian President Oleksandr Turchynov on 1 March 2014. He actively AKSENOV (Сергей Moldova lobbied for the 'referendum' of 16 March 2014 and was one of the co- Валерьевич signatories of the ’treaty on Crimea´s accession to the Russian AKCëHOB), Federation’ of 18 March 2014. On 9 April 2014 he was appointed acting Serhiy Valeriyovych ‘Head’ of the so-called ‘Republic of Crimea’ by President Putin. On 9 AKSYONOV (Сергiй October 2014, he was formally ‘elected’ 'Head' of the so-called 'Republic Валерiйович Аксьонов) of Crimea'. Aksyonov subsequently decreed that the offices of ‘Head’ and ‘Prime Minister’ be combined. Member of the Russia State Council. 1/83 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 2. Rustam Ilmirovich DOB: 15.8.1976 As former Deputy Minister of Crimea, Temirgaliev played a relevant role 17.3.2014 TEMIRGALIEV in the decisions taken by the ‘Supreme Council’ concerning the POB: Ulan-Ude, ‘referendum’ of 16 March 2014 against the territorial integrity of Ukraine. (Рустам Ильмирович Buryat ASSR He lobbied actively for the integration of Crimea into the Russian Темиргалиев) (Russian SFSR) Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 22 October 2015
    General Coordination Meeting – Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 22 October 2015 Discussion Action Points/Decisions 1. Update of the current humanitarian situation in Oblast from LOMCA, UN OCHA and SES UN OCHA representative thanked the partners for active participation in HNO workshop held in Sievierodonetsk and announced that the results would be shared once the report is finalized and approved. There were further discussions of the Updated Temporary Order for control over the movement of persons, vehicles and cargos (goods) across the contact line within Donetska and Luhanska Oblasts in terms of its practical application and these discussions brought out many issues. There are certain regulations with unclear implementation mechanisms e.g. how to deliver cargos from Luhanska Oblast where no staging areas are planned to be arranged. On the other hand even while these staging areas are not arranged in Donetska Oblast, the National Fiscal Service of Ukraine (NFSU) and Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) expressed their willingness to facilitate movement of the humanitarian cargo. OSCE SMM reports are being regularly shared with the cluster leads and focal points in the field as it was agreed before for the partners to respond to the needs identified locally. It was noted that OSCE SMM reports continue having a lot of information about mined areas or UXOs present in the residential areas. The partners were again requested to provide information about their activities and plans in order to avoid duplication and to identify the gaps. Deputy Chief of Luhansk Department of SES informed that they helped LOMCA to receive and distribute the humanitarian aid (40 tons of food) from the State Reserve Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • NRC: Profiling of IDP Situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine
    ProfilingAnnual of IDP situation Report in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-drivenfrom approach the toBoard durable solutions 2019 Acknowledgements NRC would like to thank NRC staff and Mr. Petr Kostohryz, JIPS staff, members of the Techni- cal Working Group and the Advisory Group, Luhansk State Regional Administration, in partic- ular the Social Protection Department, Prof. Volodymyr Sarioglo, Analytical Center Sociocon- sulting, NGO Stabilisation Support Services, Luhansk Regional IDP Council. List of Abbreviations CSO Civil Society Organisation GCA Government-Controlled Area (includes any government-controlled area in Ukraine not limited to Luhansk or Donetsk regions) GDP Gross Domestic Product IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP Internally Displaced Person JIPS Joint IDP Profiling Service NGCA Non-Government Controlled Area NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NRC Norwegian Refugee Council SME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise SSS NGO Stabilisation Support Services UAH Ukrainian Hryvnia UN United Nations Profiling of IDP situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-driven approach to durable solutions 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ...............................................................4 2. Introduction .......................................................................5 3. Methodology ......................................................................7 4. Limitations ........................................................................7 5. International Standards and National Frameworks on Durable Solutions
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015
    General Coordination Meeting – Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015 Discussion Action Points/Decisions 1. Summary of steps taken based on decisions of the previous meeting by UN OCHA OCHA to follow up on the implications of new Temporary Order of entry/exit to NGCAs for humanitarian cargo UN OCHA summarized activities based on the decisions of the last General Coordination Meeting. The movement. issue of unaccompanied minors is being addressed both at oblast and national levels. WHO keeps checking if tuberculin was delivered to all raions of the oblast. For the moment, it is confirmed that Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions and Lysychansk didn’t receive it. WHO and UN OCHA had the meetings with the authorities in Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions. The maternity hospital in Bilovodsk serves three raions and many women come for delivery from NGCAs of the oblast. The authorities asked to support the hospital with hygiene kits both for women and for newborns. At the national level UN OCHA continues to provide support in the development of the Law on “humanitarian assistance”. It is expected that the draft is finalized by June 30 and then passed for discussion to the Parliament of Ukraine. As of today only 30% of required funding has been funded or pledged as part of Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP). The new Temporary Order on entry/exit to NGCAs has been adopted and came into force. For the moment no commercial cargoes are permitted to NGCAs due to security situation. 2. Update of the current humanitarian situation in Oblast from UN OCHA and LOMCA SES to share the estimated costs of transition center with the humanitarian partners for their participation in The number of officially registered IDPs is growing despite of difficulties in crossing the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR Q & a Related to Measures Introduced in Response to COVID
    UNHCR Q & A related to measures introduced in response to COVID-19 outbreak in Ukraine Draft This document has been prepared to answer the most frequent questions that arise among internally displaced persons regarding quarantine measures and their impact. The answers are based on the legislative and normative measures adopted by the Government, separate ministries and the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. More information is available at their respective web pages. Requests for additional information and complaints can be addressed to the governmental hotline or hotlines of different organizations, whose contacts are provided as well. 1. I am an IDP from Alchevsk residing in Sievierodonetsk. My mother stays in Alchevsk. In early March, I visited her and could not leave NGCA before introduction of quarantine measures. Now I am locked in Alchevsk as checkpoints are closed. I am afraid that in case quarantine is prolonged, my IDP certificate will be revoked and I will lose my targeted assistance and other benefits. What shall I do? Indeed, in a regular situation, in case an IDP is absent at the controlled part of the territory for 60 days or more, his/her IDP registration is cancelled and IDP certificate is revoked. However, the Government of Ukraine adopted a decision that during quarantine measures and 30 days after they are lifted IDP certificates would not be cancelled. Moreover, staying in NGCA for this period will not be counted into 60 days’ term. Your IDP targeted assistance will be allocated on your bank account. More information on the issue of social assistance is available on the web page of the Ministry of Social Policy here: https://www.msp.gov.ua/news/18396.html Complaints with regard to access to social benefits can be addressed to the Government’s hotline 15- 45.
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities
    Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance Civil Society in Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities Volodymyr Lukichov Tymofiy Nikitiuk Liudmyla Kravchenko Luhansk oblast DONBAS DONBAS Stanytsia Donetsk Luhanska Zolote oblast Mayorske Luhansk Donetsk Maryinka Novotroitske RUSSIA Hnutove Mariupol Sea of Azov About DCAF DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance is dedicated to improving the se- curity of people and the States they live in within a framework of democratic governance, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. DCAF contributes to making peace and de- velopment more sustainable by assisting partner states and international actors supporting them to improve the governance of their security sector through inclusive and participatory reforms. It creates innovative knowledge products, promotes norms and good practices, provides legal and policy advice and supports capacity building of both state- and non-state security sector stakeholders. Active in over 70 countries, DCAF is internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading centres of excellence for security sector governance (SSG) and security sector reform (SSR). DCAF is guided by the principles of neutrality, impartiality, local ownership, inclusive participation, and gender equality. www.dcaf.ch. Publisher DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance P.O.Box 1360 CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland [email protected] +41 (0) 22 730 9400 Authors: Volodymyr Lukichov, Tymofiy Nikitiuk, Liudmyla Kravchenko Copy-editor: dr Grazvydas Jasutis, Richard Steyne
    [Show full text]
  • Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), Based on Information Received As of 19:30, 29 April 20 | OSCE
    4/30/2018 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 29 April 20 | OSCE Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 29 April 20 KYIV 30 April 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. The SMM recorded more ceasere violations in Donetsk region and fewer in Luhansk region between the evenings of 27 and 28 April, compared with the previous reporting period. Between the evenings of 28 and 29 April, it recorded fewer ceasere violations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions, compared with the previous 24 hours. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske; it recorded ceasere violations inside the Petrivske and the Stanytsia Luhanska disengagement areas; its access remained restricted there and elsewhere, including in Izvaryne, Kadiivka and Voznesenivka.* Members of the armed formations told an SMM patrol that it would be detained if it did not comply with requests to inspect SMM vehicles at a checkpoint north of Horlivka*. The SMM observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines on both sides of the contact line. The SMM observed damage in residential areas in Pikuzy and Bila Hora and followed up on reports of civilian casualties in Dokuchaievsk and Donetsk city. It continued to facilitate access to the Donetsk Filtration Station for Voda Donbassa employees and heard ceasere violations in the area, including by a multiple launch rocket system, despite security guarantees. The SMM also continued to facilitate and monitor repairs to power lines near Yuzhna-Lomuvatka and conrmed that Vodafone services had been restored in several non-government-controlled areas of Donetsk region.
    [Show full text]
  • East Ukraine
    UKRAINE - East Ukraine For Humanitarian Purposes Only Pre-Conflict and Current Network for Selling Produce Production date : 10 October 2017 Pre-Conflict LUHANSK GCA Current LUHANSK GCA ² SIEVIERODONETSK ! SIEVIERODONETSK ! ! NOVOAIDAR ! NOVOAIDAR LYSYCHANSK ! LYSYCHANSK! SLOVIANSK EAST LUHANSK SLOVIANSK ! EAST LUHANSK POPASNA ! POPASNA ! ! ! KRAMATORSK ! KRAMATORSK ! ! ! BAKHMUT ! ! ! BAKHMUT ! ! ! STANYTSIA! STANYTSIA! BAKHMUT ! ! LUHANSKA DRUZHKIVKA ! LUHANSKA POPASNA ! BAKHMUT POPASNA PERVOMAISK DRUZHKIVKA ! PERVOMAISK ! ! ! LUHANSK ! LUHANSK ! KOSTIANTYNIVKA ! KOSTIANTYNIVKA ! ! ! ALCHEVSK TORETSK ALCHEVSK TORETSK !! ! ! DONETSK GCA TORETSK ! ! DONETSK GCA TORETSK ! ! ! ! ! HORLIVKA LUHANSK NGCA POKROVSK ! HORLIVKA LUHANSK NGCA POKROVSK AVDIIVKA AVDIIVKA ! ! KHRUSTALNYI KHRUSTALNYI ! AVDIIVKA ! SELYDOVE ! SELYDOVE ANTRATSYT AVDIIVKA ANTRATSYT YASYNUVATA YASYNUVATA SHAKHTARSK SHAKHTARSK ! MAKIIVKA MAKIIVKA KRASNOHORIVKA ! SNIZHNE KURAKHOVE ! !DONETSK ! DONETSK SNIZHNE WEST WEST DONETSK DONETSK ! ! DONETSK NGCA ! DONETSK NGCA ! ! ! ! VOLNOVAKHA ! VOLNOVAKHA ! ! ! ! RUSSIAN RUSSIAN FEDERATION ! FEDERATION SOUTH ! SOUTH DONETSK DONETSK ! !! ! MARIUPOL ! MARIUPOL ! SUMSKA Kms SEA OF AZOV SEA OF AZOV 0 10 20 30 POLTAVSKA KHARKIVSKA Settlements Selling Produce (symbol size Data Sources: LUHANSKA based on number of settlements with citizens Water bodies: © Open Street Map contributors who sold within) Assessed Settlements Administrative boundaries, settlements: OCHA, 2017 ! 1 DNIPROPETROVSKA Selling own agricultural produce connection Service network data: REACH, June 2017 ! ≤ 5 DONETSKA Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 37 N ! ≤ 10 BSU Boundary Contact: [email protected] ZAPORIZKA ! ≤ 15 5km Buffer from INSO Grey Zone RUSSIAN Note: Data, designations and boundaries contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free FEDERATION ≤ 30 and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associated, or donors mentioned on this SEA OF AZOV ! INSO Grey Zone (May 2017) map..
    [Show full text]