Brave Report Issue 14 Daradanelles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Brave Report Issue 14 Daradanelles Issue 14 !1 Brave Report ! The Damned Dardanelles Background to the Gallipoli campaign The Gallipoli campaign which commenced in February 1915 was conceived for two primary reasons. RN Northern Ireland - In Remembrance Issue 14 !2 (i) The land war on the Western Front had virtually stagnated into a stalemate and there was a need to relieve Russia from pressure by the Ottoman Empire. Some Allied commanders argued for opening up a ‘second front’ against the weaker Ottomans and Austro- Hungarians. In Britain, the chief advocate for this strategy was Winston Churchill, who had been appointed First Lord of the Admiralty before his 37th birthday. Churchill had a low opinion of Ottoman military capacity: he considered Ottoman land forces to be poorly equipped, organised and commanded, while the Ottoman navy relied mainly on decrepit ships from the 19th century. (ii) The Ottoman Empire was strategically located between the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Balkans, the Middle East, and northern Africa. Despite the Ottoman Empire’s preference of an alliance with Great Britain - attempts were made to forge an alliance with London in 1908, 1911 and 1913. Britain did not react positively due to a fear of having to prop up the Empire either economically of militarily, and Britain had forged an alliance with Russia, the traditional foe of the Ottomans. Germany was more interested in an Ottoman alliance, particularly as war approached. Since 1904 Berlin had been constructing a railway across Ottoman territory to Baghdad. Once completed the Berlin-to-Baghdad railway would provide easy access to and from ports and oil fields in Mesopotamia (Iraq). A German-Ottoman alliance would secure this railway and hand Germany control of the Bosphorus, a neck of water connecting the Mediterranean with the Black Sea. It would also give the Germans land access to northern Africa and the Middle East. German-Ottoman negotiations intensified during the RN Northern Ireland - In Remembrance Issue 14 !3 July crisis, and a secret alliance was finally signed on August 2nd 1914, just five days after the first declaration of war. The Ottomans did not formally enter World War I until late October, when their fleet entered the Black Sea and fired artillery at Russian ports there. The Royal Navy was involved in both major elements of the campaign - at sea and ashore. The Royal Navy was involved in both major elements of the ill-fated Dardanelles campaign - at sea and ashore. The price was high both in crews and in the Royal Naval Division. In February 1915 a joint Anglo-French naval force attempted to blast open the Dardanelles, a narrow strait connecting the Mediterranean with the Sea of Marmara and the Black Sea – but the Allied ships sustained heavy damage from sea mines and land-based Ottoman artillery. With a purely naval attack now impossible, Allied commanders made the decision for an amphibious landing, to be undertaken sometime in April or May. Allied soldiers would be landed on the Gallipoli peninsula and clear it of Ottoman defenders and artillery pieces. With control of the Dardanelles coastline, Allied ships would have a clear run to the Sea of Marmara and the Bosphorus, where they could attack Constantinople. The Allies hastily organised an invasion force. With British generals reluctant to release experienced men from the Western Front, the Gallipoli landing force was comprised mainly of British units stationed in the Middle East, British Empire forces (Australians, New Zealanders, Indians and Canadians) and 80,000 French colonial RN Northern Ireland - In Remembrance Issue 14 !4 troops shipped in from Africa. The majority of these units had not seen battle; many of the British Empire troops were freshly recruited and deployed after just a few weeks’ training. A six-week pause between the February 1915 naval bombardment and April 1915 landing proved costly The Ottomans, meanwhile, began preparations for the imminent invasion with the assistance of German adjutant Otto Liman von Sanders. While Ottoman troops trained and drilled, defensive positions were built along critical points of the Dardanelles peninsula, known to the locals as Gelibolu (Gallipoli). The coastline was mined; likely beaches were fenced with barbed wire; machine- gun nests were installed on elevated positions. The Allies were confident of victory, however the six-week pause between the February 1915 naval bombardment and April 1915 landing would prove costly. Ottoman forces, though thinly spread and poorly equipped, were well prepared. The Allied invasion plan aimed to bombard Ottoman defences with naval artillery, then stretch and disorient their forces with several co-ordinated landings. But when the invasion began on April 25th, the plan soon went awry. At two of the pre-determined landing points, the Allies encountered much stronger opposition than anticipated. At ‘V Beach’, British troops approaching the beach in boats were strafed with machine-gun fire. On the other side of the peninsula, Allied soldiers reached ‘W Beach’ only to find it strewn with barbed wire and mines. Ottoman machine-gun nests in elevated positions opened fire once they were ashore. The death toll at these two RN Northern Ireland - In Remembrance Issue 14 !5 beaches exceeded 50 per cent. Meanwhile, landing forces elsewhere on the peninsula strolled ashore with barely a casualty. The Allied soldiers at ‘S Beach’ found it defended by only 15 Ottoman soldiers. At ‘Y Beach’, the coastline was deserted and British soldiers stood around on the beach, pondering what to do. The most famous blunder of the Gallipoli campaign occured further north at ‘Z Beach’, north of Gaba Tepe. The objective here was a broad four-mile stretch of flat beach – but when the mission began before dawn on April 25th, the boats became disoriented in the pitch- black night and landed a mile north of their target. ANZAC Cove Much of the Australian and New Zealand contingent came ashore at a small inlet, later dubbed ANZAC Cove. As the Allies came ashore in numbers, Mustafa Kemal – one of the Ottoman Empire’s most talented officers – moved to the area and set up defensive positions around the inlet. Surrounded by high hilltops and thick scrub, ANZAC Cove was easily defended by Ottoman snipers and machine-gunners, operating from elevated positions. Allied attempts to break out of the area were repelled and within a week, the situation at ANZAC Cove had reached stalemate. Though unable to advance, the Allies maintained their position on the beach for almost eight months. Further breakout attempts were launched in August at Lone Pine, Chunuk Bair and The Nek – but all failed with high casualties and no further offensives were contemplated. RN Northern Ireland - In Remembrance Issue 14 !6 Elsewhere, British and French forces were no more successful in advancing up the peninsula. By early December, London had decided to abandon the Gallipoli campaign. ANZAC Cove was evacuated by sea in December 1915, an operation many historians consider to be the most successful element of the entire campaign. The rest of the peninsula was evacuated by mid-January 1916. The Dardanelles cost in excess of 44,000 Allied lives The attempt to capture the Dardanelles was an unmitigated military disaster, riddled with false assumptions and poor planning that cost in excess of 44,000 Allied lives. In contrast, the defence of Gallipoli was the Ottoman Empire’s most successful military operation of the war. Men from across the former British Empire fought at Gallipoli: from England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland, from Newfoundland and Nepal, from India and North Africa, and from Australia and New Zealand. Although most of the Ottoman forces were Turkish soldiers defending their homeland, men from as far afield as Baghdad, Beirut and Bulgaria joined their ranks. Almost 36,000 Commonwealth servicemen are buried or commemorated on Gallipoli, including nearly 25,000 members of British regiments, over 7,200 of Australian units, more than 2,300 of New Zealand forces, and more than 1,500 members of Indian units. As many as 97,000 Allied soldiers are estimated to have suffered wounds of sickness, and thousands died after being taken RN Northern Ireland - In Remembrance Issue 14 !7 elsewhere for treatment. The French cemetery overlooking Morto Bay is the final resting place of 3,200 men along with a further 12,000 whose remains are held in four ossuaries. Ottoman casualties of what is known in Turkey as the Battle of Çanakkale are estimated by the Turkish authorities to number between 250,000 and 300,000, of whom at least 87,000 were killed. The campaign had a profound impact across the former British Empire. It became particularly meaningful for Australia and New Zealand, whose forces suffered heavy losses for the first time and would go on to play a crucial role on the Western Front. The anniversary of the landings on 25 April would eventually become a significant date of commemoration known as Anzac Day. For Turkey, the Battle of Çanakkale had a significant legacy in the newly-formed post-war state led by Mustafa Kemal, wartime general and hero of the campaign who would become known as Ataturk, 'the father of the Turks.' Many Turkish memorials stand alongside those of France and the former British Empire to commemorate all those who fell during the campaign. Inscribed on several memorials across the peninsula, most notably on a stone monolith which stands just to the south of Ari Burnu, are words of Kemal Ataturk, spoken in 1934: Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives;" You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country," Therefore rest in peace." There is no difference between the Johnnies" and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side," Here in this country of ours." You, the mothers," RN Northern Ireland - In Remembrance Issue 14 !8 Who sent their sons from far away countries" Wipe away your tears." Your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace." After having lost their lives on this land" They have become our sons as well.
Recommended publications
  • Hornblower's Ships
    Names of Ships from the Hornblower Books. Introduction Hornblower’s biographer, C S Forester, wrote eleven books covering the most active and dramatic episodes of the life of his subject. In addition, he also wrote a Hornblower “Companion” and the so called three “lost” short stories. There were some years and activities in Hornblower’s life that were not written about before the biographer’s death and therefore not recorded. However, the books and stories that were published describe not only what Hornblower did and thought about his life and career but also mentioned in varying levels of detail the people and the ships that he encountered. Hornblower of course served on many ships but also fought with and against them, captured them, sank them or protected them besides just being aware of them. Of all the ships mentioned, a handful of them would have been highly significant for him. The Indefatigable was the ship on which Midshipman and then Acting Lieutenant Hornblower mostly learnt and developed his skills as a seaman and as a fighting man. This learning continued with his experiences on the Renown as a lieutenant. His first commands, apart from prizes taken, were on the Hotspur and the Atropos. Later as a full captain, he took the Lydia round the Horn to the Pacific coast of South America and his first and only captaincy of a ship of the line was on the Sutherland. He first flew his own flag on the Nonsuch and sailed to the Baltic on her. In later years his ships were smaller as befitted the nature of the tasks that fell to him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trade Journal Newsletter Editor Been Told by Many That They Now Have the Best Weed Hon
    DS T H E T R A D E 249 JOURNAL 9 Derbyshire Submariners Newsletter Issue Number 249 July 2020 Freedom of the City of Derby to RN Submarine Service Granted 28 April 2002 EDITORIAL BLACK TOT DAY 31 July 2020 - 1970-2020 Black Tot Day (July 31, 1970) is the name given Immediately after the June NL release, the PSU to the last day on which the Royal Navy issued (Power Supply Unit) literally went bang on my 4-year sailors with a daily rum ration (the daily tot). old high spec computer. I contacted the Computer Builders in Bolton to be told the good news was the part was under warranty. but the bad news no supplies due to CV until 11 June, so I thought it would be an appropriate birthday You soothed my nerves and warmed my limbs present; wrong. Basically, on 13 And cheered my dismal heart. Jun they told me they would not Procured my wants, obliged my whims, supply me like for like, as it was not part of the 10- And now it’s time to part. year guarantee on the part, and I would have had to ‘Mid endless perils of the deep re-wire a new one in instead of just plug it in with And miseries untold. existing wires. Thus, I was forced to pay out You summoned sweet forgetful sleep £132.10p for what should have been a warranty Cocooned me from the cold. covered item for supply. Still now up and running, Ten years ago, the ‘pound o’leaf’ and trying to piece all my notes for NL from the last That cast its fragrant smell.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naval Engineer
    THE NAVAL ENGINEER SPRING/SUMMER 2019, VOL 06, EDITION NO.2 All correspondence and contributions should be forwarded to the Editor: Welcome to the new edition of TNE! Following the successful relaunch Clare Niker last year as part of our Year of Engineering campaign, the Board has been extremely pleased to hear your feedback, which has been almost entirely Email: positive. Please keep it coming, good or bad, TNE is your journal and we [email protected] want to hear from you, especially on how to make it even better. By Mail: ‘..it’s great to see it back, and I think you’ve put together a great spread of articles’ The Editor, The Naval Engineer, Future Support and Engineering Division, ‘Particularly love the ‘Recognition’ section’ Navy Command HQ, MP4.4, Leach Building, Whale Island, ‘I must offer my congratulations on reviving this important journal with an impressive Portsmouth, Hampshire PO2 8BY mix of content and its presentation’ Contributions: ‘..what a fantastic publication that is bang up to date and packed full of really Contributions for the next edition are exciting articles’ being sought, and should be submitted Distribution of our revamped TNE has gone far and wide. It is hosted on by: the MOD Intranet, as well as the RN and UKNEST webpages. Statistics taken 31 July 2019 from the external RN web page show that there were almost 500 visits to the TNE page and people spent over a minute longer on the page than Contributions should be submitted average. This is in addition to all the units and sites that received almost electronically via the form found on 2000 hard copies, those that have requested electronic soft copies, plus The Naval Engineer intranet homepage, around 700 visitors to the internal site.
    [Show full text]
  • We Envy No Man on Earth Because We Fly. the Australian Fleet Air
    We Envy No Man On Earth Because We Fly. The Australian Fleet Air Arm: A Comparative Operational Study. This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2016 Sharron Lee Spargo BA (Hons) Murdoch University I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. …………………………………………………………………………….. Abstract This thesis examines a small component of the Australian Navy, the Fleet Air Arm. Naval aviators have been contributing to Australian military history since 1914 but they remain relatively unheard of in the wider community and in some instances, in Australian military circles. Aviation within the maritime environment was, and remains, a versatile weapon in any modern navy but the struggle to initiate an aviation branch within the Royal Australian Navy was a protracted one. Finally coming into existence in 1947, the Australian Fleet Air Arm operated from the largest of all naval vessels in the post battle ship era; aircraft carriers. HMAS Albatross, Sydney, Vengeance and Melbourne carried, operated and fully maintained various fixed-wing aircraft and the naval personnel needed for operational deployments until 1982. These deployments included contributions to national and multinational combat, peacekeeping and humanitarian operations. With the Australian government’s decision not to replace the last of the aging aircraft carriers, HMAS Melbourne, in 1982, the survival of the Australian Fleet Air Arm, and its highly trained personnel, was in grave doubt. This was a major turning point for Australian Naval Aviation; these versatile flyers and the maintenance and technical crews who supported them retrained on rotary aircraft, or helicopters, and adapted to flight operations utilising small compact ships.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The
    ‘The Admiralty War Staff and its influence on the conduct of the naval between 1914 and 1918.’ Nicholas Duncan Black University College University of London. Ph.D. Thesis. 2005. UMI Number: U592637 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592637 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 9 Chapter 1. 23 The Admiralty War Staff, 1912-1918. An analysis of the personnel. Chapter 2. 55 The establishment of the War Staff, and its work before the outbreak of war in August 1914. Chapter 3. 78 The Churchill-Battenberg Regime, August-October 1914. Chapter 4. 103 The Churchill-Fisher Regime, October 1914 - May 1915. Chapter 5. 130 The Balfour-Jackson Regime, May 1915 - November 1916. Figure 5.1: Range of battle outcomes based on differing uses of the 5BS and 3BCS 156 Chapter 6: 167 The Jellicoe Era, November 1916 - December 1917. Chapter 7. 206 The Geddes-Wemyss Regime, December 1917 - November 1918 Conclusion 226 Appendices 236 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographic Censorship in the First World War
    Ryerson University Digital Commons @ Ryerson Theses and dissertations 1-1-2011 Photographic Censorship In The irsF t World War : A Comparison Between The Realistic Travels Stereograph Set And British Personal Photograph Albums From The olC lection Of The Art Gallery Of Ontario Emma Leverty Ryerson University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ryerson.ca/dissertations Part of the Photography Commons Recommended Citation Leverty, Emma, "Photographic Censorship In The irF st World War : A Comparison Between The Realistic Travels Stereograph Set And British Personal Photograph Albums From The oC llection Of The Art Gallery Of Ontario" (2011). Theses and dissertations. Paper 1571. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Ryerson. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Ryerson. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHOTOGRAPHIC CENSORSHIP IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE REALISTIC TRAVELS STEREOGRAPH SET AND BRITISH PERSONAL PHOTOGRAPH ALBUMS FROM THE COLLECTION OF THE ART GALLERY OF ONTARIO by Emma Leverty, Art History BAH, Queen‘s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2008 A thesis Presented to Ryerson University and the Art Gallery of Ontario in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Program of Photographic Preservation and Collections Management Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2011 © Emma Leverty 2011 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis or dissertation. I authorize Ryerson University and the Art Gallery of Ontario to lend this thesis to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research.
    [Show full text]
  • Remni May 13
    MAY 13, 2019 remembrance ni 23 from NI lost in sinking of HMS Goliath off Gallipoli - May 13, 1915 ! HMS Goliath was torpedoed by a Turkish destroyer while she was at anchor win Morto Bay off Cape Helles. 570 of the 750 men aboard were lost when the ship sank after an explosion. Two lost in Goliath, Boy First Class Alfred Henry Page !1 MAY 13, 2019 Gadd and Stoker First Class Hector Hiles, had Newtownards links. At least 23 men from N Ireland were lost and 73 from all Ireland. At the start of World War I the major navies had significant numbers of pre-dreadnought battleships which, though in many cases only eight or ten years old, had been rendered wholly obsolete by the commissioning of HMS Dreadnought in 1905. This, the first turbine-driven, all-big gun, battleship, mounted ten 12” guns, compared with the almost universal armament of four 12-inch guns for the average pre- dreadnought, and set the model for all subsequent capital ships. By the outbreak of war in 1914 large numbers of “dreadnoughts” – the name had already come to symbolise a type – were in service in the larger navies. Putting obsolete pre-dreadnoughts into a battle-line which would have to face much more powerfully-armed dreadnoughts was likely to be little short of suicidal. HMS Goliath was a Canopus class pre-dreadnought battleship that served off the east coast of Africa and on the Dardanelles in the early years of the First World War. Like the rest of her class, at the start of August 1914 she joined the 8th Battle Squadron of the channel fleet, helping to cover the passage of the BEF to France.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Royal Marines 1837-1914 HE Blumberg
    History of the Royal Marines 1837-1914 HE Blumberg (Minor editing by Alastair Donald) In preparing this Record I have consulted, wherever possible, the original reports, Battalion War and other Diaries, accounts in Globe and Laurel, etc. The War Office Official Accounts, where extant, the London Gazettes, and Orders in Council have been taken as the basis of events recounted, and I have made free use of the standard histories, eg History of the British Army (Fortescue), History of the Navy (Laird Clowes), Britain's Sea Soldiers (Field), etc. Also the Lives of Admirals and Generals bearing on the campaigns. The authorities consulted have been quoted for each campaign, in order that those desirous of making a fuller study can do so. I have made no pretence of writing a history or making comments, but I have tried to place on record all facts which can show the development of the Corps through the Nineteenth and early part of the Twentieth Centuries. H E BLUMBERG Devonport January, 1934 1 P A R T I 1837 – 1839 The Long Peace On 20 June, 1837, Her Majesty Queen Victoria ascended the Throne and commenced the long reign which was to bring such glory and honour to England, but the year found the fortunes of the Corps at a very low ebb. The numbers voted were 9007, but the RM Artillery had officially ceased to exist - a School of Laboratory and nominally two companies quartered at Fort Cumberland as part of the Portsmouth Division only being maintained. The Portsmouth Division were still in the old inadequate Clarence Barracks in the High Street; Plymouth and Chatham were in their present barracks, which had not then been enlarged to their present size, and Woolwich were in the western part of the Royal Artillery Barracks.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of COPENHAGEN SHIPS of the LINE (Guns)
    THE BATTLE OF COPENHAGEN 2nd. April 1801 THE BRITISH FLEET SHIPS of the LINE (Guns) Elephant (74)* Captain Thomas Foley Captain Thomas Hardy (as volunteer) Defiance (74) Captain Richard Retallick Edgar (74) Captain George Murray Monarch (74) Captain James Mosse Bellona (74) Captain Thomas Thompson Ganges(74) Captain Thomas Fremantle Russell (74) Captain William Cuming Agamemnon (64) Captain Robert Fancourt Ardent (64) Captain Thomas Bertie Polyphemus (64) Captain John Lawford Glatton (50) Captain William Bligh Isis (50) Captain James Walker FRIGATES Amazon (38) Captain Henry Riou Desiree (36) Captain Henry Inman Blanche (36) Captain Graham Hammond Alcmene (32) Captain Samuel Sutton Jamaica (24) Captain Jonas Rose SLOOPS Arrow (12) Commander William Rose Dart (12) Commander John Devonshire BRIGS Cruiser (18) Commander James Brisbane Harpy (18) Commander William Birchall BOMB SHIPS Discovery Commander John Conn Explosion Commander John Martin Hecla Commander Richard Hatherill Sulphur Commander Hender Witter Terror Commander Samuel Rowley Volcano Commander James Watson Zebra Commander Edward Clay FIRE SHIPS Zephyr Commander Clotworthy Upton Otter Commander George McKinley THE COMMANDERS Admiral Sir Hyde Parker Commander­in­Chief, Baltic Fleet. HMS London (not engaged) Vice Admiral Lord Nelson KB Second in Command, Baltic Fleet Commanded the Fleet Action at Copenhagen HMS Elephant Rear Admiral Thomas Graves Third in Command, Baltic Fleet Second in Command at the Fleet Action HMS Defiance Notes: Captains Foley, Hardy, and Thompson had served under Nelson at The Battle of The Nile, 1st. August 1798. Captain William Bligh had resumed service following his acquittal by Court Martial over the Bounty mutiny. Contemporary Reports of the Battle of Copenhagen Foreword by Michael Bruff The following extracts from the Naval Chronicle for 1801 relate to the lead­up to the battle, the engagement itself, and its aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Wreck Rap Malta
    wreck rap Divers on the wreck of the Polynesian in Malta Text by Fatin Iesa Photos courtesy of Dave Gration, University of Malta, Heritage Malta Ranging from calm shore dives for beginner divers to techni- cal diving on elusive, unmarked wreck sites, which can only be found via depth sounder—diving in Malta has it all. Just beyond Malta’s dramatic underwater landscapes of strange rock for- mations, chimneys and caves, visitors can discover Malta’s intriguing and piquant past. To Malta's aid visiting divers, a newly creat- ed Underwater Cultural Heritage Unit (UCHU) has been formed within the Heritage Malta agen- Deep-Water Wrecks cy under the country’s cultural & Newly Created Underwater Heritage Unit ministry to manage the deep historical wreck sites of Malta. The UCHU provides informa- Currently rated as the world’s tenth small- Mediterranean Sea, 93km south of Italy torically had great strategic importance ters for the British Mediterranean Fleet tion regarding the history of the est and fifth most densely populated and 288km north of Africa, surrounded by as a naval base in the power struggles where many ships and warplanes for the wrecks, how to appreciate them country, Malta is the biggest of the three warm clear waters and year-round tem- between Europe, Africa and the Middle Allied powers were stationed. islands of the Maltese Archipelago, which perate climate. East. In the 19th century, Malta was colo- Touched by the sands of time, many and what the proper etiquette is also includes Gozo and Comino islands. Due to its central location in the nised by the British.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract JULIAN CORBETT and the DEVELOPMENT of a MARITIME
    Abstract JULIAN CORBETT AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MARITIME STRATEGY by SAMUEL E. ROGERS NOVEMBER, 2018 Director: DR. WADE G. DUDLEY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Sir Julian Corbett (1854-1922) is one of the two most influential theorists of sea power. He defined maritime operations, limited war, and our understanding of the “British Way of War,” while also foreshadowing the Great War at Sea. Corbett’s lasting theoretical contributions to strategic thought are captured in Some Principles of Maritime Strategy (1911). It remains a centerpiece of military and international relations theory and continues to be studied in professional military education alongside Thucydides, Sun Tzu, Antoine-Henri Jomini, Carl von Clausewitz, and Alfred Thayer Mahan. Corbett’s influential theories were shaped by multiple influences, including Mahan, Corbett’s own study of British sea power, his reading and understanding of Clausewitz’s On War, and Admiral John Fisher’s naval revolution at the turn of the twentieth century. While Mahan linked sea power with national power, Corbett illuminated this relationship and displayed a keen understanding, developed through his own historical study, of the limits of sea power, and war more broadly, as an instrument of national policy. His influential theory on the role of sea power in the geopolitical context of the European balance of power at the turn of the twentieth century is a clear reflection of Britain’s rapidly changing strategic environment and the equally rapid changes in military technology. Heavily influenced by Admiral Fisher, Corbett, building on the work of Mahan and military theorist Carl von Clausewitz, defined maritime strategy, limited war, command of the sea, and, at the height of the British Empire, laid the ground work for understanding a “British way of war.” Corbett was first and foremost a historian and a professional military educator.
    [Show full text]
  • THE (Vhmunrcaror
    THE ( WvhMUNrcAroR VOL 17'No. 6 \,Vl NTER 1965 COLLYER SMITH & GO., LTD. INCORPORATED INSURANCE BROKERS MORTGAGE BROKERS (Members of Services Insurance Brokers' Association) 219 West Street, Fareham, Hants Telepho ne N o. 2211 1221212213 THE COMPLETE INSURANCE AND MORTGAGE SERVICE CONSULT US FOR YOUR REAUIREMENTS We specialise in Life lnsurance and the arrangemenr of Private Dwelling House Mortgages either by Building Society Repayment or Endowment Assurance We arrange and service all other forms of lnsurance (Fire, Accident, Household, Motor, Etc.) For SERVICE PERSONNEL all forms of Life Assurance arranged FREE of any extra premium whatsoever for cover of: WAR RISKS : : WORLD-WIDE SERVICE SUBMARINING : DIVING : FLYING ON DUTY AS PASSENGERS IN SERVICE AIRCRAFT FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE FOR THE ARRANGEMENT OF PRIVATE DWELLING HOUSE MORTGAGES ON "THE HOME LOAN'' SCHEME AVAILABLE TO CHIEF PETTY OFFICERS, PETTY OFFICERS AND LEADING RATINGS iAll Mortgage advances are a subject to valuation of property and income status of the applicant) It costs only o postoge stomp or o phone call to obtoin our advice Every enqui ry receives the personol ottention of one of our principols. :ii - ,'i-li r '1- ri' [:, lli. r . lii"l: ti, i,: r'fl illJl li * BRITTSH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE APPROVED TO DEF. 133 STANDARDS ll,l : I ' I'lli * ADOPTED BY NATO AND COMMONWEALTH ARMIES ii i l * THE SMALLEST, LTGHTEST, FULLY TRANSISTORISED ONE MAN H.F. TRANSMTTTER/RECETVER EQUIPMENT OF MORE qil THAN 20 WATTS OUTPUT IN PRODUCTION. ,ffirrxq. '','$ #H, Y 4,et- BRITISH COMMUI{ICATIONS CORPORATIOI{ TTD. A MEMBER OF THE CONTROIS SOUTH WAY, EXHIBITION GROUND, WEMBLEY, MIDDLESEX AND COMMUNICATIONS G ROUP Telephone: Wembley 1212.
    [Show full text]