Carrier Pedigree HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carrier Pedigree HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH n five years’ time, if everything goes according Ito plan, the Royal Navy’s first dedicated aircraft carrier for decades should be sailing out of Portsmouth Naval Base ready for action, loaded with Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II short take-off/vertical landing jets and AgustaWestland Merlin HM2 helicopters. Getting HMS Queen Elizabeth and its sister ship, HMS Prince of Wales to the point where they are almost complete in Rosyth dockyard, has taken almost two decades of work and, crucially, political manoeuvring. Simply building the ships has cost more than £6 billion and, not surprisingly, the two carriers will be at the heart of British defence planning for the foreseeable future. Within months another aircraft carrier, in the Mediterranean literally overnight. Carrier Pedigree HMS Furious, was under construction and in The potency of British naval airpower The Navy has more than 103 years’ experience 1917 Squadron Commander Edwin Harris was demonstrated again six months later, in operating aircraft from ships, dating back Dunning made the first landing on the ship, as when Swordfish launched from the second to May 9, 1912, when Commander Charles it was under way in Scapa Flow off Orkney. carrier to bear the name HMS Ark Royal Rumney Samson became the first airman to In the 1920s and 1930s the Royal Navy found and crippled the mighty German take off from a moving warship. His Short S.38 experimented with larger and better carriers, battleship B ismarck in the North Atlantic. lifted off from the battleship HMS Hibernia also developing aircraft and weapons to fly from The golden age of British aircraft carriers in as it steamed at 15kts (28km/h) during the them. It was a period of naval warfare transition the 1950s and 1960s saw the Navy fielding Royal Fleet Review at Weymouth, England. between the dominance of the battleship and jet fighters, airborne early warning aircraft Just over two years later, the Navy launched the rise of the aircraft carrier. Revolutionary and anti-submarine helicopters from their the first ever warship dedicated to operating thinkers in navies around the world could see decks. During the period the Royal Navy aircraft. Named HMS Ark Royal, it had been the potential of the carrier and embarked air introduced the angled flight deck, allowing lain down as a merchant ship, but midway wing, but their ideas had yet to be tried in battle. simultaneous launch and recovery of jet aircraft. through its construction the Admiralty acquired This changed on November 11, 1940 when Admiralty ambitions to build a it, fitting a flat deck and cranes so seaplanes HMS Illustrious launched a strike force of Fairey 63,000-ton supercarrier, CVA 01, could be launched and recovered. Swordfish torpedo bombers to attack the main in the 1960s were scuppered port of the Italian fleet at Taranto. The daring by defence cuts and the strike took the Italians by surprise and, within service instead set in minutes, half the fleet was at the bottom of the train plans to build harbour. Only two Swordfish were lost, the the three new attack changing the balance of naval power Invincible- Below: HMS Queen Elizabeth (R 08) at Rosyth dockyard, Scotland, following her naming ceremony on July 4, 2015. The F-35B on the ski-jump is a full-scale mock-up brought in for the occassion. MOD Crown Copyright/CPOA(Phot) Thomas Tam McDonald 36 DECEMBER 2015 #333 www.airforcesmonthly.com HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH The Royal Navy’s new carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth is on track for completion next year. Tim Ripley RULING THE reports. WAVES AGAIN... class through-deck cruisers (aircraft carriers 2007, with first metal cut at Rosyth and several Carrier Capability in all but name). These 22,000-ton carriers other shipyards around Britain. Escalating costs HMS Queen Elizabeth is now 70% complete, became inextricably linked with the 1982 and technical problems delayed the work and in with power systems up and running and radar Falklands War and iconic Sea Harrier the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review turning. The Royal Navy is deciding how the fighter, HMS Invincible and Illustrious both (SDSR) the Navy had to sacrifice its ship and its air wing will be utilised. The crew is deploying south to join combat. last operational carrier, HMS Ark already aboard preparing for In the 1990s, the Royal Navy began Royal, to help find the money to sea trials next August and the working up designs for what became the sustain the new carrier programme. ship is planned to ‘undock’ in Queen Elizabeth-class and in the 1998 April 2017, before handover Strategic Defence Review the government a month later. HMS Prince of of Prime Minister Tony Blair gave the Wales is scheduled to enter formal go-ahead for research and service in 2020. development to begin. Almost a decade passed before the design was finalised and contracts were eventually placed in ‘the two carriers will be at the heart of British defence planning for the foreseeable future.’ www.airforcesdaily.com #333 DECEMBER 2015 37 HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH ‘With both carriers in service one will always be ready to conduct operations with at least a squadron of F-35Bs embarked.’ Rear Admiral Keith Blount, Assistant Chief of an air offensive using the F-35B’s ‘day-one’ waters against a lightly armed opponent, Naval Staff (Aviation, Amphibious Capability stealth capability to knock down enemy air insurgents or pirates, or within a humanitarian and Carriers), is the senior reporting officer for defences, with Raytheon BGM-109 Tomahawk mission. It combines a Royal Marines landing the carrier programme and responsible for Land Attack Missile strikes from Astute-class force with a full spectrum of helicopter support, the ships’ entry into service. He told a briefing nuclear submarines or surface ships. including Chinook HC4/5/6 and Merlin HC4 at the 2015 Defence & Security Equipment The carrier strike force mix could be ‘plug- transports to lift troops and their supplies International event that carriers were: “Not and-play’, said RAdm Blount, including US ashore. The offensive element includes just naval assets but capabilities that can be Marine Corps F-35Bs operating from the new capabilities to find and strike land and used to support army and air force operations. carriers; the Crowsnest airborne early warning sea targets, with Apache AH1 attack, Britain still has a global foreign policy and we system, fitted to Merlin maritime helicopters, Wildcat AH1 scout and Merlin HM2 are free to move the carriers where we want”. will be an integral part of the capability. maritime surveillance helicopters. In September 2014, Prime Minister David Meanwhile, Merlin HM2s would create an Cameron marked a key decision in the carrier anti-submarine screen and perform surface High Gear Preparation programme when he committed the Navy to surveillance around the maritime task group. With the months counting down to HMS Queen standing up a “Continuous carrier capability”. Next, the rear admiral discussed the Elizabeth sailing out of Rosyth, RAdm Blount The government had previously been unclear Expeditionary Strike concept, involving the and his colleagues are moving preparations whether HMS Prince of Wales would enter embarkation of a squadron of F-35Bs and into high gear, ready to accept the vessel service, leaving the Royal Navy taking ‘carrier Royal Marine Commandos, with transport into service in 2017. The project will gain strike capability holidays’ when HMS Queen helicopters to take the troops ashore. This momentum, since a series of critical milestones Elizabeth had to go into dock for refit or repair. force mix is intended to place a landing party have to be passed in quick succession for a With both carriers in service one will always ashore in the face of a determined enemy, credible front line capability to be fielded. be ready to conduct operations with at the F-35Bs providing close air support. If a The Military Aviation Authority will be heavily least a squadron of F-35Bs embarked. The suitable airstrip were secured, the F-35Bs involved, ensuring the ship and its embarked other ship could then be in refit, carrying could disembark and continue to support aircraft can perform safely under operational out work-up training or employed as a the amphibious assault as it moves inland. conditions. Gaining release to service for aircraft commando carrier for the Royal Marines, Littoral Manoeuvre is the third operational flying from HMS Queen Elizabeth is an essential with transport helicopters embarked. concept, envisaged as a mission in coastal ‘tick in the box’ and an extensive flight-test The Royal Navy is making plans for a readiness cycle to synchronise this activity from the end of the decade, managing availability and ensuring fixed-wing and helicopter squadrons are ready to operate from the vessels. According to Rear Admiral Blount, the carriers will always sail within a maritime task group including warships and support vessels. This protects them and makes them self-sustaining far out to sea, without support from land-based assets. This is the classic embodiment of aircraft carriers, as mobile sovereign airfields that can be moved around the world unencumbered by the need to remain within range of land-based aircraft. He added: “The carriers will change the way the Royal Navy operates.” The Navy is working on three main concepts of carrier operations to give future the UK a wide range of strategic options. They will be conducted nationally or in coalition operations. The first core mission, Carrier Strike is a classic power projection mission to launch offensive air operations against opponents with modern integrated air defence networks. This could combine air attacks in the opening hours of 38 DECEMBER 2015 #333 HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH Left: The second UK F-35B Lightning II, ZM136, takes off from Eglin AFB, Florida, on May 20, 2013.
Recommended publications
  • Master Narrative Ours Is the Epic Story of the Royal Navy, Its Impact on Britain and the World from Its Origins in 625 A.D
    NMRN Master Narrative Ours is the epic story of the Royal Navy, its impact on Britain and the world from its origins in 625 A.D. to the present day. We will tell this emotionally-coloured and nuanced story, one of triumph and achievement as well as failure and muddle, through four key themes:- People. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s people. We examine the qualities that distinguish people serving at sea: courage, loyalty and sacrifice but also incidents of ignorance, cruelty and cowardice. We trace the changes from the amateur ‘soldiers at sea’, through the professionalization of officers and then ships’ companies, onto the ‘citizen sailors’ who fought the World Wars and finally to today’s small, elite force of men and women. We highlight the change as people are rewarded in war with personal profit and prize money but then dispensed with in peace, to the different kind of recognition given to salaried public servants. Increasingly the people’s story becomes one of highly trained specialists, often serving in branches with strong corporate identities: the Royal Marines, the Submarine Service and the Fleet Air Arm. We will examine these identities and the Royal Navy’s unique camaraderie, characterised by simultaneous loyalties to ship, trade, branch, service and comrades. Purpose. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s roles in the past, and explain its purpose today. Using examples of what the service did and continues to do, we show how for centuries it was the pre-eminent agent of first the British Crown and then of state policy throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Hornblower's Ships
    Names of Ships from the Hornblower Books. Introduction Hornblower’s biographer, C S Forester, wrote eleven books covering the most active and dramatic episodes of the life of his subject. In addition, he also wrote a Hornblower “Companion” and the so called three “lost” short stories. There were some years and activities in Hornblower’s life that were not written about before the biographer’s death and therefore not recorded. However, the books and stories that were published describe not only what Hornblower did and thought about his life and career but also mentioned in varying levels of detail the people and the ships that he encountered. Hornblower of course served on many ships but also fought with and against them, captured them, sank them or protected them besides just being aware of them. Of all the ships mentioned, a handful of them would have been highly significant for him. The Indefatigable was the ship on which Midshipman and then Acting Lieutenant Hornblower mostly learnt and developed his skills as a seaman and as a fighting man. This learning continued with his experiences on the Renown as a lieutenant. His first commands, apart from prizes taken, were on the Hotspur and the Atropos. Later as a full captain, he took the Lydia round the Horn to the Pacific coast of South America and his first and only captaincy of a ship of the line was on the Sutherland. He first flew his own flag on the Nonsuch and sailed to the Baltic on her. In later years his ships were smaller as befitted the nature of the tasks that fell to him.
    [Show full text]
  • RAFOC REMINISCENCES and RAMBLINGS - WEEK 28 - 16Th OCTOBER 2020 GREETINGS
    ROYAL AIR FORCE OFFICERS’ CLUB Johannesburg P.O. Box 69726 BRYANSTON 2021 [email protected] www.rafoc.org President: David MacKinnon-Little Vice Presidents: Basil Hersov, Colin Francis, Geoff Quick, David Lake Chairman: Bruce Harrison [email protected] Tel: 011 673 0291 Cell: 083 325 0025 Vice Chairman: Jon Adams [email protected] Tel: 011 678 7702 Cell: 082 450 0616 Hon. Secretary: Colin Ackroyd Tel: 012 942 1111 Cell: 082 800 5845 Hon. Treasurer: Jeff Earle Tel: 011 616 3189 Cell: 083 652 1002 Committee Members: Russell Swanborough Tel: 011 884 2611 Cell: 083 263 2740 Karl Jensen Tel: 011 234 0598 Cell: 082 331 4652 Jean-Michel Girard Cell: 083 659 1067 Geoff Fish Tel: 012 667 2759 Cell: 083 660 9697 Web Master: Hanke Fourie Tel: Cell: 082 553 0210 Bank Account: Nedbank - Melrose Arch Br: 19 66 05 Account 19 66 278 063 RAFOC REMINISCENCES AND RAMBLINGS - WEEK 28 - 16th OCTOBER 2020 GREETINGS: Day 200 of the great lockdown arrived this week, with the WHO (allegedly) changing stance on lockdowns now that the real economic consequences are apparent, and Covid cases fall far short of early “doomsday predictions”. Otherwise, it was quite a week – the heated debate on testing and preventive measures continues in the UK, with pubs and restaurants being closed, and Sir Keir Starmer accusing the PM of causing "confusion, chaos and unfairness" by waiting until this week to announce a new local lockdown system. (He would, wouldn’t he?) Indonesia using scarecrows to keep Covid away.... The next turn in the US Presidential election campaign was that Trump, having tested positive for Covid, is now ”immune”...the media frenzy continues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naval Engineer
    THE NAVAL ENGINEER SPRING/SUMMER 2019, VOL 06, EDITION NO.2 All correspondence and contributions should be forwarded to the Editor: Welcome to the new edition of TNE! Following the successful relaunch Clare Niker last year as part of our Year of Engineering campaign, the Board has been extremely pleased to hear your feedback, which has been almost entirely Email: positive. Please keep it coming, good or bad, TNE is your journal and we [email protected] want to hear from you, especially on how to make it even better. By Mail: ‘..it’s great to see it back, and I think you’ve put together a great spread of articles’ The Editor, The Naval Engineer, Future Support and Engineering Division, ‘Particularly love the ‘Recognition’ section’ Navy Command HQ, MP4.4, Leach Building, Whale Island, ‘I must offer my congratulations on reviving this important journal with an impressive Portsmouth, Hampshire PO2 8BY mix of content and its presentation’ Contributions: ‘..what a fantastic publication that is bang up to date and packed full of really Contributions for the next edition are exciting articles’ being sought, and should be submitted Distribution of our revamped TNE has gone far and wide. It is hosted on by: the MOD Intranet, as well as the RN and UKNEST webpages. Statistics taken 31 July 2019 from the external RN web page show that there were almost 500 visits to the TNE page and people spent over a minute longer on the page than Contributions should be submitted average. This is in addition to all the units and sites that received almost electronically via the form found on 2000 hard copies, those that have requested electronic soft copies, plus The Naval Engineer intranet homepage, around 700 visitors to the internal site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2
    The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society The Old angbournianP Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society First published in the UK 2020 The Old Pangbournian Society Copyright © 2020 The moral right of the Old Pangbournian Society to be identified as the compiler of this work is asserted in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, “Beloved by many. stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any Death hides but it does not divide.” * means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior consent of the Old Pangbournian Society in writing. All photographs are from personal collections or publicly-available free sources. Back Cover: © Julie Halford – Keeper of Roll of Honour Fleet Air Arm, RNAS Yeovilton ISBN 978-095-6877-031 Papers used in this book are natural, renewable and recyclable products sourced from well-managed forests. Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro, designed and produced *from a headstone dedication to R.E.F. Howard (30-33) by NP Design & Print Ltd, Wallingford, U.K. Foreword In a global and total war such as 1939-45, one in Both were extremely impressive leaders, soldiers which our national survival was at stake, sacrifice and human beings. became commonplace, almost routine. Today, notwithstanding Covid-19, the scale of losses For anyone associated with Pangbourne, this endured in the World Wars of the 20th century is continued appetite and affinity for service is no almost incomprehensible.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Brief-History-Of-R-A-F-Honington
    Continuing our brief history of RAF Honington, Part 4a. The Buccaneer Years (I had originally planned that ‘Part 4’ would include both the Buccaneer and the subsequent Tornado years but lack of time to research and space in the ‘Rag’ to tell the tale has meant that I have had to separate the two periods. Apologies for this but the Tornado years will appear in the next issue of the Rag.) As was mentioned at the end of the last instalment; following the departure of the ‘Vee’ bombers, RAF Honington was placed in ‘reserve’ for conversion to accept the American-built General Dynamics F-111 super-sonic swing-wing bomber. Like many Government decisions, the purchase of these aircraft was cancelled, (like the planned TSR-2 before it and which the F-111 was planned to ‘replace’), although F- 111’s were a frequent sight in local skies as the USAF 48th Tactical Fighter Wing operated these aircraft from Lakenheath from 1977 to 1992. With the ‘loss’ of the F-111, the base was scheduled to receive the ‘unwanted’ Hawker Siddeley (Blackburn) Buccaneer. I say ‘unwanted’ because, although previously ‘offered’ to the RAF as a replacement for their Canberras in the low-level role, the Buccaneer was originally designed as a low- level ship-borne attack aircraft and indeed many of the later RAF Buccaneers were redundant Royal Navy aircraft that became surplus following the reduction in the Navy aircraft carrier fleet. (For a more detailed history of the Buccaneer, and especially the example that sits as a ‘gate guardian’ at Honington today, refer to my article Buccaneer XK526.) So it was that in November 1969 the first Buccaneers arrived at Honington and deliveries continued during the early 1970’s.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The
    ‘The Admiralty War Staff and its influence on the conduct of the naval between 1914 and 1918.’ Nicholas Duncan Black University College University of London. Ph.D. Thesis. 2005. UMI Number: U592637 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592637 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 9 Chapter 1. 23 The Admiralty War Staff, 1912-1918. An analysis of the personnel. Chapter 2. 55 The establishment of the War Staff, and its work before the outbreak of war in August 1914. Chapter 3. 78 The Churchill-Battenberg Regime, August-October 1914. Chapter 4. 103 The Churchill-Fisher Regime, October 1914 - May 1915. Chapter 5. 130 The Balfour-Jackson Regime, May 1915 - November 1916. Figure 5.1: Range of battle outcomes based on differing uses of the 5BS and 3BCS 156 Chapter 6: 167 The Jellicoe Era, November 1916 - December 1917. Chapter 7. 206 The Geddes-Wemyss Regime, December 1917 - November 1918 Conclusion 226 Appendices 236 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Raf Harrier Story
    THE RAF HARRIER STORY ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2006: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2006 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISBN 0-9530345-2-6 Printed by Advance Book Printing Unit 9 Northmoor Park Church Road Northmoor OX29 5UH 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman Group Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary Group Captain K J Dearman Membership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol AMRAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA Members Air Commodore H A Probert MBE MA *J S Cox Esq BA MA *Dr M A Fopp MA FMA FIMgt *Group Captain N Parton BSc (Hons) MA MDA MPhil CEng FRAeS RAF *Wing Commander D Robertson RAF Wing Commander C Cummings Editor & Publications Wing Commander C G Jefford MBE BA Manager *Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS EARLY HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES AND EMERGING 8 STAFF TARGETS by Air Chf Mshl Sir Patrick Hine JET LIFT by Prof John F Coplin 14 EVOLUTION OF THE PEGASUS VECTORED
    [Show full text]
  • Dyndal, Gjert Lage (2009) Land Based Air Power Or Aircraft Carriers? the British Debate About Maritime Air Power in the 1960S
    Dyndal, Gjert Lage (2009) Land based air power or aircraft carriers? The British debate about maritime air power in the 1960s. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1058/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Land Based Air Power or Aircraft Carriers? The British debate about Maritime Air Power in the 1960s Gjert Lage Dyndal Doctor of Philosophy dissertation 2009 University of Glasgow Department for History Supervisors: Professor Evan Mawdsley and Dr. Simon Ball 2 Abstract Numerous studies, books, and articles have been written on Britains retreat from its former empire in the 1960s. Journalists wrote about it at the time, many people who were involved wrote about it in the immediate years that followed, and historians have tried to put it all together. The issues of foreign policy at the strategic level and the military operations that took place in this period have been especially well covered. However, the question of military strategic alternatives in this important era of British foreign policy has been less studied.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Royal Marines 1837-1914 HE Blumberg
    History of the Royal Marines 1837-1914 HE Blumberg (Minor editing by Alastair Donald) In preparing this Record I have consulted, wherever possible, the original reports, Battalion War and other Diaries, accounts in Globe and Laurel, etc. The War Office Official Accounts, where extant, the London Gazettes, and Orders in Council have been taken as the basis of events recounted, and I have made free use of the standard histories, eg History of the British Army (Fortescue), History of the Navy (Laird Clowes), Britain's Sea Soldiers (Field), etc. Also the Lives of Admirals and Generals bearing on the campaigns. The authorities consulted have been quoted for each campaign, in order that those desirous of making a fuller study can do so. I have made no pretence of writing a history or making comments, but I have tried to place on record all facts which can show the development of the Corps through the Nineteenth and early part of the Twentieth Centuries. H E BLUMBERG Devonport January, 1934 1 P A R T I 1837 – 1839 The Long Peace On 20 June, 1837, Her Majesty Queen Victoria ascended the Throne and commenced the long reign which was to bring such glory and honour to England, but the year found the fortunes of the Corps at a very low ebb. The numbers voted were 9007, but the RM Artillery had officially ceased to exist - a School of Laboratory and nominally two companies quartered at Fort Cumberland as part of the Portsmouth Division only being maintained. The Portsmouth Division were still in the old inadequate Clarence Barracks in the High Street; Plymouth and Chatham were in their present barracks, which had not then been enlarged to their present size, and Woolwich were in the western part of the Royal Artillery Barracks.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS ARK ROYAL, 1976-1978, the Last Commission
    HMS ARK ROYAL 1976 to 1978 THE LAST COMMISSION FOREWORD by Captain E. R. ANSON, Royal Navy The last commission of HMS ARK ROYAL has been as It is a tribute to every man on board that wherever she active and demanding as any that went before. The ship has has been, whatever she has done, ARK ROYAL has been the Flagship of the Silver Jubilee Review, has taken emerged with credit. part in five major international exercises and has been This is a welcome opportunity for me to say well done thrust more into the limelight than ever before by a success- and thank you to the Ships Company for keeping the ship ful television series. Moreover, being the last commission of fully operational right up to the end of the commission; not the last CVA, the ship has attracted more interest from forgetting the support that we have all had from our wives both the media and the public than any other ship in the and families. They also deserve a big thank you. Fleet. 3 THE ARK ROYAL HERITAGE The name ARK ROYAL has a majestic ring, and our years her main roles were that of conducting reconnaissance, present ship is the fourth in the history of the Royal Navy spotting and photographic flights, and she was present at to bear it. the Dardanelles Campaign and the Gallipoli Landings. The first ship to be called ARK ROYAL was built at During 1920 while operating in the Black Sea, Ark helped Deptford for Sir Walter Raleigh in 1586, who in fact named with the evacuation of Russian refugees from the her ARK RALEIGH as the custom in those days was for Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Brave Report Issue 21 RNAS
    Issue 21 !1 Brave Report ! Royal Naval Air Service The Royal Naval Air Service or RNAS was the air arm of the Royal Navy until near the end of the First World War, when it merged with the army’s Royal Flying Corps to form a new service (the first of its kind in the world), the Royal Air Force. When the RFC was founded on April 13, 1912, it was intended to encompass all military flying. The Navy, however, was not pleased at all forms of naval aviation RN Northern Ireland - In Remembrance Issue 21 !2 being moved to an Army corps, and soon formed its own, unauthorised, flying branch with a training centre at Eastchurch. Command of this group was given over to Murray Sueter, who had been working on airship development for the navy. At the time, the Admiralty, not for nothing known as the "Senior Service", had enough political clout to ensure that this act went completely unchallenged. The Royal Naval Air Service was officially recognised on July 1, 1914 by First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill. The new service was completely separate from the RFC except for the Central Flying School, which was still used, and the RNAS became in effect a rival air force. By the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914, the RNAS had more aircraft under its control than the RFC. The Navy maintained twelve airship stations around the coast of Britain from Longside, Aberdeenshire in the northeast to Anglesey in the west. In addition to seaplanes, carrier borne aircraft, and other aircraft with a legitimate "naval" application the RNAS also maintained several crack fighter squadrons on the Western Front, as well as allocating scarce resources to an independent strategic bombing force at a time when such operations were highly speculative.
    [Show full text]