DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Evaluation Report Berlin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Evaluation Report Berlin FINAL EVALUATION REPORT BERLIN Authors: Name Partner Institution Elisabeth Kracker Integrated Transport Planning TU Berlin Hans-Joachim Becker Integrated Transport Planning TU Berlin Diana Runge Integrated Transport Planning TU Berlin Astrid Karl Social Science Research Centre Berlin (WZB) Wiebke Zimmer Öko-Institut e.V. Martin Schmied Öko-Institut e.V. Martin Schönberg Centre for Technology and Society (CTS) TU Berlin Peer review: Friedemann Kunst Senate Department of Urban Development Issued in November 2005 Table of Contents Table of Contents A INTRODUCTION ................................................................................1 A.1 General Remarks .....................................................................................................1 A.2 TELLUS landscape in Berlin.....................................................................................2 1 Demonstration measures...........................................................................................2 2 Thematic clusters.......................................................................................................3 3 Integration into local transport policy .........................................................................4 4 Actors of evaluation ...................................................................................................5 B EVALUATION ON DEMONSTRATION MEASURE LEVEL..............7 B.1 Approach ..................................................................................................................7 1 Overview ....................................................................................................................7 2 Types of evaluation....................................................................................................8 3 Objectives ..................................................................................................................9 4 Scenarios.................................................................................................................10 B.2 Demonstration Measure 6.4 – Tele-Parking System/Mobile Parking .....................13 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................13 2 Description of demonstration measure ....................................................................13 3 Implementation process...........................................................................................17 4 Results.....................................................................................................................20 5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................29 6 Scenario...................................................................................................................33 B.3 Demonstration Measure 6.5 – Road Pricing...........................................................43 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................43 2 Description of demonstration measure ....................................................................43 3 Implementation process...........................................................................................45 4 Results.....................................................................................................................46 5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................48 6 Scenario...................................................................................................................49 Issued in November 2005 I Final Evaluation Report - Berlin B.4 Demonstration Measure 7.5 – Future Management of Urban Public Transport.....51 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................51 2 Description of demonstration measure ....................................................................51 3 Implementation process...........................................................................................53 4 Results.....................................................................................................................56 5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................59 6 Scenario...................................................................................................................63 B.5 Demonstration Measure 8.4 – Metropolitan Fleet Car............................................65 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................65 2 Description of demonstration measure ....................................................................65 3 Implementation process...........................................................................................67 4 Results.....................................................................................................................70 5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................72 6 Scenario...................................................................................................................75 B.6 Demonstration Measure 8.5 - Car Modal................................................................85 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................85 2 Description of demonstration measure ....................................................................85 3 Implementation process...........................................................................................87 4 Results.....................................................................................................................90 5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................93 6 Scenario...................................................................................................................97 B.7 Demonstration Measure 9.3 – Inner City Logistics Centre ...................................105 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................105 2 Description of demonstration measure ..................................................................105 3 Implementation Process ........................................................................................108 4 Results...................................................................................................................112 5 Conclusions ...........................................................................................................113 6 Scenario.................................................................................................................116 II Issued in November 2005 Table of Contents B.8 Demonstration Measure 9.4 – Financing Contracts for NG Vehicles ...................127 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................127 2 Description of demonstration measure ..................................................................127 3 Implementation process.........................................................................................129 4 Results...................................................................................................................130 5 Conclusions ...........................................................................................................133 6 Scenario.................................................................................................................135 B.9 Demonstration Measure 10.4 – Customer and User Participation .......................137 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................137 2 Description of demonstration measure ..................................................................137 3 Evaluation methods ...............................................................................................139 4 Implementation process.........................................................................................139 5 Conclusions ...........................................................................................................145 6 Scenario.................................................................................................................147 B.10 Demonstration Measure 11.6 – Dynamic Real-Time Passenger Information.......149 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................149 2 Description of demonstration measure ..................................................................149 3 Implementation process.........................................................................................152 4 Results...................................................................................................................153 5 Conclusions ...........................................................................................................158 6 Scenario.................................................................................................................161
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Map of the European Inland Waterway Network – Carte Du Réseau Européen Des Voies Navigables – Карта Европейской Сети Внутренних Водных Путей
    Map of the European Inland Waterway Network – Carte du réseau européen des voies navigables – Карта европейской сети внутренних водных путей Emden Berlin-Spandauer Schiahrtskanal 1 Берлин-Шпандауэр шиффартс канал 5.17 Delfzijl Эмден 2.50 Arkhangelsk Делфзейл Архангельск Untere Havel Wasserstraße 2 Унтере Хафель водный путь r e Teltowkanal 3 Тельтов-канал 4.25 d - O Leeuwarden 4.50 2.00 Леуварден Potsdamer Havel 4 Потсдамер Хафель 6.80 Groningen Harlingen Гронинген Харлинген 3.20 - 5.45 5.29-8.49 1.50 2.75 р водный п 1.40 -Оде . Papenburg 4.50 El ель r Wasserstr. Kemi Папенбург 2.50 be аф Ode 4.25 нканал Х vel- Кеми те Ha 2.50 юс 4.25 Luleå Belomorsk K. К Den Helder Küsten 1.65 4.54 Лулео Беломорск Хелдер 7.30 3.00 IV 1.60 3.20 1.80 E m О - S s Havel K. 3.60 eve Solikamsk д rn a е ja NE T HERLANDS Э р D Соликамск м Хафель-К. vin с a ная Б Север Дви 1 III Berlin е на 2 4.50 л IV B 5.00 1.90 о N O R T H S E A Meppel Берлин e м 3.25 l 11.00 Меппел o о - 3.50 m р 1.30 IV О с а 2 2 де - o к 4.30 р- прее во r 5.00 б Ш дн s о 5.00 3.50 ь 2.00 Sp ый k -Б 3.00 3.25 4.00 л ree- er Was п o а Э IV 3 Od ser .
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Mobility Plans National Approaches and Local Practice
    Urban Mobility Plans National Approaches and Local Practice Moving Towards Strategic, Sustainable and Inclusive Urban Transport Planning Sustainable Urban Transport Technical Document #13 Published by About the authors Dr-Ing. Susanne Böhler-Baedeker (Rupprecht Consult) is in Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Jharkhand, a planner, specialised on urban mobility planning. After covering areas such as bus rapid transit, street design, receiving her diploma Susanne joined the Wuppertal parking management, and transit-oriented development. Institute (WI) for Climate, Environment and Energy. In Before joining ITDP, Chris worked for the Transportation her latest position at the WI she was the co-director of and Land Use Coalition (now Transform) in Oakland; the the research unit “Energy, transport and climate policy” Metropolitan Transportation Commission, also in Oak- with around 50 employees. She was responsible for the land; the City of Berkeley’s Planning Department; Meyer, coordination and management of transport research Mohadddes Associates, Los Angeles; and Delin Consult in related projects and was involved in several national and Accra. Chris received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees international projects about sustainable and low carbon in environmental policy from the Earth Systems Pro- transportation on different political levels. gram at Stanford University. Being a Rupprecht Consult staff member (www.rup- Mathias Merforth joined the Transport Policy Advi- precht-consult.eu) since 2013, Susanne currently coor- sory Services team at GIZ after receiving his diploma in dinates the EU-funded project CH4LLENGE which transport economics in 2013. For his thesis at Technical concentrates on policies to improve transport planning University Dresden he analysed the regulatory, financial processes in European cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin by Sustainable Transport
    WWW.GERMAN-SUSTAINABLE-MOBILITY.DE Discover Berlin by Sustainable Transport THE SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT GUIDE GERMANY The German Partnership for Sustainable Mobility (GPSM) The German Partnership for Sustainable Mobility (GPSM) serves as a guide for sustainable mobility and green logistics solutions from Germany. As a platform for exchanging knowledge, expertise and experiences, GPSM supports the transformation towards sustainability worldwide. It serves as a network of information from academia, businesses, civil society and associations. The GPSM supports the implementation of sustainable mobility and green logistics solutions in a comprehensive manner. In cooperation with various stakeholders from economic, scientific and societal backgrounds, the broad range of possible concepts, measures and technologies in the transport sector can be explored and prepared for implementation. The GPSM is a reliable and inspiring network that offers access to expert knowledge, as well as networking formats. The GPSM is comprised of more than 150 reputable stakeholders in Germany. The GPSM is part of Germany’s aspiration to be a trailblazer in progressive climate policy, and in follow-up to the Rio+20 process, to lead other international forums on sustainable development as well as in European integration. Integrity and respect are core principles of our partnership values and mission. The transferability of concepts and ideas hinges upon respecting local and regional diversity, skillsets and experien- ces, as well as acknowledging their unique constraints. www.german-sustainable-mobility.de Discover Berlin by Sustainable Transport This guide to Berlin’s intermodal transportation system leads you from the main train station to the transport hub of Alexanderplatz, to the redeveloped Potsdamer Platz with its high-qua- lity architecture before ending the tour in the trendy borough of Kreuzberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transport in the World's Major Cities
    Feature Evolution of Urban Railways (part 2) Rail Transport in The World’s Major Cities Takao Okamoto and Norihisa Tadakoshi Many of the world’s large cities grew in development, particularly with regard to American city; and Hong Kong, Seoul and conjunction with railways, and today, the following: Tokyo representing Asian cities. large cities cannot depend only on motor • The correlation between railways and vehicles for transportation. With worries urban growth over global environmental issues, public • The location of terminals for intercity London transportation systems are increasingly and intra-city transport seen as an important way to expand and • Examination of various public transit Located in southeast England near the revitalize large cities, while consuming systems, including non-infrastructure mouth of the River Thames, London less energy and other resources. • Strategic planning of rail networks expanded during the Industrial Revolution This article looks at public transportation based on urban development trends (1760–1850) and secured its dominance systems in some major cities of the world and future models as the heart of the British Empire during and identifies similarities and differences The cities selected for this comparative the Victorian era (1837–1901). It’s in areas such as history of development, study are: London as the first city to adapt population grew from about 500,000 in railway networks, and method of rail technology to public transport; Paris, the 17th century to 4.5 million by the end operation. Our aim is to explore the future Berlin and Moscow as three major of the 19th century. The modern relationship between urban and transport European cities; New York as a North- metropolis of Greater London consists of The London Railway Network King’s Cross/St.Pancras Paddington LCY Victoria Waterloo LHR R.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of German-Scandinavian Relations
    A History of German – Scandinavian Relations A History of German-Scandinavian Relations By Raimund Wolfert A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Raimund Wolfert 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Table of contents 1. The Rise and Fall of the Hanseatic League.............................................................5 2. The Thirty Years’ War............................................................................................11 3. Prussia en route to becoming a Great Power........................................................15 4. After the Napoleonic Wars.....................................................................................18 5. The German Empire..............................................................................................23 6. The Interwar Period...............................................................................................29 7. The Aftermath of War............................................................................................33 First version 12/2006 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations This essay contemplates the history of German-Scandinavian relations from the Hanseatic period through to the present day, focussing upon the Berlin- Brandenburg region and the northeastern part of Germany that lies to the south of the Baltic Sea. A geographic area whose topography has been shaped by the great Scandinavian glacier of the Vistula ice age from 20000 BC to 13 000 BC will thus be reflected upon. According to the linguistic usage of the term
    [Show full text]
  • Zwischen Metropole Und Naturidyll – Eine Reise Durch Den Landkreis
    Oberhavel: Zwischen Metropole und Naturidyll – eine Reise durch den Landkreis Oberhavel liegt nah am Puls der Metropole Berlin, doch haben Trubel und Hektik der Großstadt hier keine Chance. Dämpfen vor ihren Toren zunächst von Wasser und Wald durchwebte Kleinstädte den Rhythmus der Hauptstadt, so verebbt er mit jedem weiteren Kilometer gen Norden endgültig im Wogen der Roggenfelder und Rauschen der Buchenhaine. Die Spannung zwischen Großstadt und Umland bestimmt den Charme unserer Region. Seit rund 100 Jahren ist im Süden des Landkreises die Industrie zu Hause. Oranienburg, Hen- nigsdorf und Velten sind Sitz renommierter Unternehmen wie Bombardier Transportation, Riva Stahl, der Wall AG, der Takeda Pharma GmbH und der Orafol GmbH. Zugleich sind es heute attraktive Wohnstädte mit Lebensqualität. Ein- und Zweifamilienhäuser, repräsentative Villen und kleine Sied- lungen prägen beliebte Wohnorte wie Hohen Neuendorf, Glienicke und Leegebruch. Vor allem junge Familien zieht es hierher, um im Grünen zu wohnen und doch alle Vorzüge Berlins genießen zu können. Denn Oberhavel liegt „direkt drüber“. Dieser Slogan be- schreibt unseren wichtigsten Standortvorteil – unsere Lage nördlich Berlins. Ob Theater, Einkaufszentrum oder Arbeitsstelle – alles ist in rund einer Stunde Fahrzeit per S-Bahn oder Auto zu erreichen. Wie der Verweis auf unsere Namenspatronin, die Obere Havel, vermuten lässt, zählt Oberhavel zu den wasserreichsten Gegenden Deutschlands. Die Havel mit ihren Kanälen und rund 100 Seen bildet ein wahres Dorado nicht nur für Wassersportler. Parallel lädt der Radfernwanderweg Berlin-Kopenhagen dazu ein, Natur und touristische Kleinode zu erkun- den. Dabei ist eine Tour durch Oberhavel stets auch eine Reise durch berlin- brandenburgische Geschichte. Historische Stadtkerne, Angerdörfer, Schlösser, Parks und Industriedenkmale zeugen davon.
    [Show full text]
  • Formed by Water Settled Here
    Kiebitz Bogs, Ländchen, and Land Seizure Flying Machines, Microscopes, The 1315-square-kilometer nature park is above all shaped Retorts by the Weichselian glaciation, which ended over 10,000 years »The surrounds of Berlin are poor in good training grounds ago. Powerful glaciers and meltwaters formed the landscape. for gliding. The ideal of the latter is formed in a hill with In the low-lying areas large moors and wetland areas arose: drops on all sides of at least 20 meters. Between Rathenow the Haveland Luch (bog), the Rhinluch (Rhin bog), and the and Neustadt and der Dosse there is a stretch of land, the Dossebruch. A unique feature of the Westhavelland are the so called Ländchen Rhinow, that contains a large selection of Marsh marigold ground moraine plateaus and terminal moraine »islands« – such hills.« Otto Lilienthal – the »first pilot« – was often in the so called Ländchen. Like large islands they rise out of the Westhavelland between 1893 and 1896 because he couldn’t for the rationalization of eyeglass and microscope production lowlands and lent themselves therefore to settlement through find in Berlin any suitable training grounds for his ever better and was ground-breaking for the further development of optics. villages and cities. In the 7th century the Slavic Hevellians constructed flying machines. With his machines dismantled he In 1801 he founded the Optische Industrie-Anstalt (Optical Formed by Water settled here. They were so called after the Havel. With the traveled by train and horse-drawn carriage to the Rhinower Industry Institute). The city of Premnitz was until 1914 still German conquest by Albert the Bear in 1157 settlers came, expectations! That’s wonderful! I must say to you, all of you Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Participation in the Havel River Basin (Berlin-Brandenburg)
    Public Participation in the Havel River Basin (Berlin- Brandenburg) Project Duration Jun - Dec 2003 Ecologic completed a report reviewing and evaluating practices of public participation in water management in the Havel river basin for the implementation of the EU's Water Framework Directive (WFD). Project results were presented by Nicole Kranz at the TU Berlin workshop on 'Public involvement in river basin management' on 9/10 February 2004. The project report is available for download. Background Public participation becomes more and more important in environmental decision-making. In 1998, the Convention of Aarhus formulated the right of the public to information, participation in decision- making and access to justice in environmental matters in a comprehensive way for the first time. The EC Water Framework Directive (WFD) was adopted in the spirit of this convention. Article 14 of the Directive clearly expresses that active involvement of all interested parties shall be encouraged and that the public has to be informed and consulted. The development of innovative participation models is necessary to fulfil the Directive's requirements in this context. But innovation does not necessarily entail the design of entirely new structures and methods. The point is more that the conception of participation processes should be based on a sound analysis of existing participation cultures and their respective stakeholder structures. This will be the starting point for the development of new concepts. Objectives The project's objectives include the compilation and evaluation of past and present approaches to public participation in decision-making on water management in the Havel coordination area (Berlin- Brandenburg) as a basis for the further development of future participation practices in the context of WFD implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Unfinished Metropolis Urban Development Manifesto for Berlin- Brandenburg
    Unfinished Metropolis Urban Development Manifesto for Berlin- Brandenburg Berlin-Brandenburg, 2020/2021 unvollendete-metropole.de Preamble Development Aspects The centenary of the incorporation of Greater Berlin is a good occasion to look Make the star centre of Potsdam – is a matter for further public dis- back. Today’s metropolis is the product of actions taken over generations, espe- cussion and planning efforts. On the other hand, the cially since the 1880s. Its rich legacy encompasses ruptures, destruction and 1 shine corona pandemic shows how at risk the centres are. expansion, unique and often fascinating places, opportunities and problems. In order to maintain and expand this unique configu- Starting point: Since the late nineteenth century, the ration of centres, an integrated centre development The 100th anniversary of Greater Berlin is also an occasion to look forwards. Greater Berlin area has developed radially, along the programme for Berlin and Brandenburg should be Even and especially in times of a pandamic. Our city, with all its potential, must railway lines and arterial roads. The resulting star prepared and implemented. Complementing the StEP turn to the great challenges of the age: climate change, resource conservation, shape has survived despite the increase in car use programme for Berlin, it should facilitate change of circular economy, social cohesion, digitalisation, sustainable food and agricul- since the 1960s, in part because of city’s divided sta- use, correct negative trends and expand existing ture, diversity of centres, green mobility, inter-state cooperation, political coher- tus during the Cold War. practices (“active urban centres”). ence – all realised in a framework of attractive and resilient urban development.
    [Show full text]
  • Techno-Economic Assessment of Battery Electric Trains and Recharging Infrastructure Alternatives Integrating Adjacent Renewable Energy Sources
    sustainability Article Techno-Economic Assessment of Battery Electric Trains and Recharging Infrastructure Alternatives Integrating Adjacent Renewable Energy Sources Christoph Streuling 1,* , Johannes Pagenkopf 1, Moritz Schenker 1 and Kim Lakeit 2 1 German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Vehicle Concepts, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany; [email protected] (J.P.); [email protected] (M.S.) 2 Institute of Electric Power Systems, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Battery electric multiple units (BEMU) are an effective path towards a decarbonized regional rail transport on partly electrified rail lines. As a means of sector coupling, the BEMU recharging energy demand provided through overhead line islands can be covered from decentralized renewable energy sources (RES). Thus, fully carbon-free electricity for rail transport purposes can be obtained. In this study, we analyze cost reduction potentials of efficient recharging infrastructure positioning and the feasibility of covering BEMU energy demand by direct-use of locally produced renewable electricity. Therefore, we set up a model-based approach which assesses relevant lifecycle costs (LCC) of different trackside electrification alternatives comparing energy supply from local RES and grid consumption. The model-based approach is applied to the example of a German regional rail line. In Citation: Streuling, C.; Pagenkopf, J.; the case of an overhead line island, the direct-use of electricity from adjacent wind power plants with Schenker, M.; Lakeit, K. on-site battery storage results in relevant LCC of EUR 173.4 M/30a, while grid consumption results in Techno-Economic Assessment of EUR 176.2 M/30a whereas full electrification results in EUR 224.5 M/30a.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin Dr. Friedemann Kunst Senatsverwaltung Für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII
    International Transport Expert Council, Moscow | 29/30 August 2013 Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin Dr. Friedemann Kunst Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII 1 Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin | Agenda 1. Berlin Today 2. Role of Public Transport 3. The Future of Public Transport: Transport Policy and Strategy 4. From Strategy to Local Transport Planning: The Planning System Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII 2 Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin | Berlin Today Berlin – Structural Data Area: 892 km²* Inhabitants: 3,375,000* Number Employed: 1,759,200* Unemployment Rate: 12.3%* Motorisation: 38 km 38 324 cars/1,000 inh.** 45% Carfree Households** * Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg. Stand 2012 Population estimate based on Census 2011 45 km ** SrV 2008 Berlin is the biggest city in Germany by far, and it is both, city and a federal state. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin | Agenda 1. Berlin Today 2. Role of Public Transport 3. The Future of Public Transport: Transport Policy and Strategy 4. From Strategy to Local Transport Planning: The Planning System Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII 4 Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin | Role of Public Transport Metropolitan Mobility Modal Split PT Walking 26,5% 28,6% Car Cycling 32,3% 12,6% 1/4 of daily trips by public transport 2/3 of daily trips by „environmental alliance“ (PT, Bike,
    [Show full text]
  • [Life Sciences Location RWK O-H-V]
    [Life Sciences Location RWK O-H-V ] Innovation and expertise in the capital region www.rwk-ohv.de [Preface] Imprint: Publisher: RWK O-H-V Contact: RWK O-H-V c/o BBG Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH Eduard-Maurer-Straße 13 | 16761 Hennigsdorf tel. + 49 3302 200330 | fax 03302.200231 [email protected] | www.rwk-ohv.de Editing and implementation: Projekt Standortmanagement und -profilierung im RWK O-H-V (Location Management and Profiling) c/o LOKATION:S Neuendorfstraße 20 b | 16761 Hennigsdorf tel. + 49 3302.2022200 | fax + 49 30 69815881 [email protected] Layout: MITPROJEKT GmbH | www.mit-projekt.de Translation: Kay Hattwig | www.kayhattwig.de All images: own representation, own survey Photos: All photos by Florian Büttner; except: Jens Dauterstedt (Cover) | Ministry for Economic Albrecht Gerber The Oberhavel district ranks among the most eco- The life sciences have developed since the turn Affairs and Energy of the State of Brandenburg (Page 3) | nomically strong regions in the east of Germany. of the century into a promising and increasingly DiagnostikNet | BB (Page 9/2) | Minister for Economic FINISH / Oranienburg (Page 10/1) | Hennigsdorf, Frank Affairs and Energy of the It is shaped by a powerful industry and an efficient important building block in the diverse economic Liebke (Page 10/2) | Velten (Page 11/1) | State of Brandenburg mid-sized sector. With its numerous businesses structure of the regional growth centre Oranien- Oberhavel district (Page 11/2) | in future-industries such as biotechnology or medi- burg-Hennigsdorf-Velten. Besides established and Hennigsdorf, Frank Liebke (Page 11/3) cal technology the district is one of the most impor- internationally-active large-scale businesses, such As of June 2016 tant life sciences locations in the capital region of as Takeda Pharma or Thermo Fisher Scientific Berlin-Brandenburg.
    [Show full text]