Unfinished Metropolis Urban Development Manifesto for Berlin- Brandenburg

Berlin-Brandenburg, 2020/2021 unvollendete-metropole.de Preamble Development Aspects

The centenary of the incorporation of Greater Berlin is a good occasion to look Make the star centre of Potsdam – is a matter for further public dis- back. Today’s metropolis is the product of actions taken over generations, espe- cussion and planning efforts. On the other hand, the cially since the 1880s. Its rich legacy encompasses ruptures, destruction and 1 shine corona pandemic shows how at risk the centres are. expansion, unique and often fascinating places, opportunities and problems. In order to maintain and expand this unique configu- Starting point: Since the late nineteenth century, the ration of centres, an integrated centre development The 100th anniversary of Greater Berlin is also an occasion to look forwards. Greater Berlin area has developed radially, along the programme for Berlin and Brandenburg should be Even and especially in times of a pandamic. Our city, with all its potential, must railway lines and arterial roads. The resulting star prepared and implemented. Complementing the StEP turn to the great challenges of the age: climate change, resource conservation, shape has survived despite the increase in car use programme for Berlin, it should facilitate change of circular economy, social cohesion, digitalisation, sustainable food and agricul- since the 1960s, in part because of city’s divided sta- use, correct negative trends and expand existing ture, diversity of centres, green mobility, inter-state cooperation, political coher- tus during the Cold War. practices (“active urban centres”). ence – all realised in a framework of attractive and resilient urban development. Outlook: Berlin und Brandenburg already have a Maintain and create The paradigm shift towards sustainable, conserving urban development must shared concept for a sustainably growing metropo- be energised, with a broad public debate on the responses to growth and con- lis: The star settlement concept concentrates future 3 socially and functionally traction processes. growth along the star’s rays and discourages sprawl. diverse residential areas This model needs to be made much better known, This Manifesto represents the essence of the “Unfinished Metropolis” proj- more broadly accepted and actively implemented. ect organised by the Architekten- und Ingenieurverein zu Berlin-Brandenburg The delineation of built and green space needs to be Starting point: Over the past 150 years the Berlin re- and its partners (exhibition 100 Years of Urban Planning for Greater Berlin, Per- clarified, as does the concrete implementation in ac- gion has experienced all kinds of housing policies spectives from Europe, results of the International Urban Planning Competition tionable plans and real development. Institutional with all kinds of results –and changing reputations for Berlin-Brandenburg 2070, Metropolengespräche, BB2070 – Magazine for and processual efforts and effective instruments are over time. The outcomes include high-density neigh- needed, including municipal-level planning (with bourhoods, highly dispersed settlements and much urban planning and urban living). land use plans) and determinations supporting ur- in-between. The inter-war modernist developments We use the term “urban development” in a broad sense extending beyond banisation of settlements within the settlement star in Berlin and Brandenburg supplied high-quality the concrete structures of the metropolis. It also encompasses the political, and maintenance and restoration of landscape out- housing at affordable prices, while the private sector social and cultural conditions under which construction occurs, the actors that side it. continues to bring forth exemplary projects. Housing influence the process – planners, developers and their opponents – and finally is a special kind of commodity that requires public care and attention. the impacts and messages of the buildings themselves. Construction also af- Reinforce and expand fects the configuration of public space, the architectural design of our spatial 2 centres and their variety Outlook: The biggest challenges are energy moder- environment. As such, urban development also comprises the relations of nisation in the existing housing stock, creating new production, the production process and the city as product, with the emphasis Starting point: Because it was incorporated compara- affordable housing to architectural and planning tively late (1920), Greater Berlin retains a unique ab- standards, preserving and creating appropriate di- on the latter. undance of centres of various forms and sizes, with versity, and preventing urban sprawl. This also me- We regard this Manifesto as a contribution to the much-needed discussion different development trajectories. Brandenburg also ans strengthening and densifying the existing and about future urban planning in Berlin and Brandenburg. It is addressed in the possesses a multitude of splendid centres. concentrating new developments on brownfield sites first place to the policy-makers responsible for making the key decisions, but within the overall framework of the star-shaped city. also to civil society, business and academia. In that sense it is both medium Outlook: A multiplicity of centres is enormously ad- Especially in Brandenburg, the conversion of disused vantageous for a sustainable metropolis. The centres military sites to housing is a stand-out feature. and message. themselves are subject to structural transformation processes, for example affecting retailing, office space and housing. In this context the future of the three principal centres – historical Mitte, City West, and the Expand rail Conserve, maintain Integrate major new rules, cooperation or publicly owned enterprises – over a regularly reassessed spectrum of public services. The 4 transport 6 and expand green and 8 projects sensitively into objective is a new, stable form of cooperation between open space the existing city strong municipalities and a respected private sector. Starting point: Rail transport has powered Berlin’s growth – within and beyond its limits – for 150 years. Starting point: The Berlin region possesses a rich and Starting point: Greater Berlin has been shaped by ma- Take the city’s role as Very early on, the radial lines were joined by the ring diverse landscape (even if some has been lost to car- jor transport infrastructure, in particular airports and railway and, following Berlin’s division, by the outer driven development): green streets and squares, parks, railway stations, as well as industrial and military fa- 10 capital seriously railway ring. allotments and cemeteries, lakes and waterways, fo- cilities. Each following their own location logic, they rests and farmland. Berlin is proud of its green World have configured the costs and benefits of the metro- Starting point: The German state as a whole has left Outlook: The underground, urban and regional net- Cultural Heritage and its tradition of exemplary care polis. But new projects have redistributed forces in powerful traces in the city, especially in the former and works are operating at their capacity and frequency of its historic gardens. the region: the post-reunification reconfiguration of current government districts Schlossareal, Wilhelms- limits. Expansion of the tram network is slow. Full use the airports and major railway stations, as well as ex- trasse and Spreebogen. Berlin was never a universally must be made of any reserves. The growing metropo- Outlook: Adequate funding and personnel need to be pansive developments at the EUREF Campus, in Jo- appreciated capital city within Germany. In the 1990s lis requires more rail transport: Regional, overground, secured for the maintenance and development of ur- hannisthal/Adlershof, in Potsdam, in Ludwigsfelde Berlin gained a reputation abroad as a cheerful, tolerant underground trains and trams as appropriate, exten- ban green space and natural landscapes, in order to and in many other Brandenburg municipalities. and extremely attractive destination, even if the newly ding outside the city limits. This includes well-desi- satisfy growing expectations and meet the challen- reunified state was not always looked upon so favoura- gned transport hubs enabling smooth intermodality. ges of climate change. Inner city streets and squares Outlook: This dynamic development continues, with bly. Germans of all ages have warmed to Berlin too, since The connectivity of the outer railway ring needs to be must be regreened and adapted to cope with expan- major projects at Südkreuz, in Siemensstadt, at the the Love Parades and Christo’s Wrapped Reichstag. utilised in accord with the star paradigm, and the be- ding demands. Regional parks must be strengthened former Airport Tegel, in Grünheide and so on. Since nefits and feasibility of another rail ring further out (also institutionally) as a central element of the sett- the departure of the last Russian forces in 1994, their Outlook: Berlin needs an active capital-city policy, a should be investigated. A new mobility culture will re- lement star promoting regional identity, recreation, enormous military sites have gradually been repur- point neglected when Greater Berlin was established quire a strategic partnership between the two states, leisure and contact with nature. Sustainable regional posed and still offer great potential. Integrating these in 1920. The federal government and the states need rail operators, the regional transport authority VBB, food supply chains should be supported and expan- capacities and linking them with the metropolis as a to show greater awareness of their capital’s positive the forum of municipalities, academia and business ded. The high standard of the historic parks and gar- whole requires cooperation between city and region. image and potential in national and international (following the Munich model). dens must be maintained. Ensuring that each new development retains its cha- contexts, and become active and responsible partners racteristic, historically conditioned form and mix of in the city’s development. This also includes suitable Create quality streets Protect the water uses must can help to generate identity. spaces and platforms in the capital for showcasing ex- amples of successful urban development policy – not 5 and squares 7 resources Reconceive municipal only from Berlin but across Germany as a whole. Starting point: The Greater Berlin area was initially Starting point: Berlin and Brandenburg is a region of 9 planning and development Intensify exchange shaped by major radial roads, which acquired their water features, with the Rivers Spree and Havel, ca- specific character from their major squares, urbani- nals and many lakes. The waterways serve multiple Starting point: Berlin and Brandenburg have unique 11 with other major cities sed villages, suburbs and landmarks. From the late functions: transport, drainage, leisure and climate. historical experience with the three major modes of 1920s onwards, Berlin was a testing ground for car- But above all Berlin sources its drinking water from economic urban development: private enterprise (for Starting point: International exchange is the life-blood driven development. The legacy is a fragmented mo- wells close to its water bodies. Water is central to the example in the late nineteenth and early twentieth of urban development. Berlin has a long tradition of torway system and a road network designed primarily natural landscape, but the urban space is relatively century); local authority–driven (for example in the this. In addition to numerous international competi- to serve the motor vehicle. detached from the waterfronts. Weimar Republic); and state-led (for example under tions, it has held major exhibitions such as the General the Nazis and in the GDR). The question here was Urban Planning Exhibition Berlin in 1910, the German Outlook: Every effort must be made to adapt the out- Outlook: Securing the water supply is a central prio- not only who led urban development – the central Building Exhibition Berlin in 1931, Interbau in 1957, and dated car-oriented urban fabric for the turn to green rity for the entire region, as a growing population in- state, the municipality or the private sector – but also the International Building Exhibition in 1984/1987. mobility demanded by climate change. Today, again, creases demand while the climate crisis exacerbates what scope it covered: public space, public transport, the main streets and squares will be crucial for the shortages. We need stronger protections and better energy supply, water and sewerage, waste disposal, Outlook: Berlin needs new drive in international ex- success of green mobility. We need to create a city management of water resources, improved public ac- food production, hygiene, housing. change and targeted cooperation projects. How are where more trams and electric buses, more cyclists cess to water bodies, responsible leisure use, and at projects managed elsewhere? How are other cities and pedestrians and fewer cars coexist fairly in gree- the planning level, integration of water bodies into ur- Outlook: Today the municipal urban development of designing high streets for a new era? How are others ned public space. ban space and landscape. In particular water manage- the Weimar Republic could serve as a model, not in its approaching sustainable housing construction and ment actors in Berlin and Brandenburg must intensify specific iteration but as a concept that needs to be inter- modernisation? We must learn from the experience their cooperation with each other and with other ar- preted for our times. A sustainable metropolis requires of other cities how new rail links, new parks and new chitectural and regional development actors. strategic policy with a long perspective, a capable admi- centres can serve sustainable growth. A new IBA nistration and responsible control – whether through might serve as a medium of international exchange. example in Berlin is the Round Table on Land Policy Institutional where civil society, parliament, city government and the boroughs come together regularly to discuss im- Reforms portant property issues. Another example of success- ful cooperation by many actors is the medium term “Vision 2030” for the Olympiapark. The objective of such cooperation processes is to agree on strategic objectives and strike a fair balance between local and regional interests, to ensure that parliamentary deci- Optimise the city/ the two states was rejected in 1996, positive and ef- sions have lasting and sustainable effects. fective cooperation has ensued, with a joint state pl- 12 borough relationship anning body and a forum of municipalities. But the state boundary remains an obstacle to sustainable Starting point: It was already clear in 1920 that the joint development. newly codified relationship between the boroughs and the city was less than ideal. Efforts to overcome Outlook: Cooperation between the states, state mi- the deficits through administrative consolidation nistries, state parliaments and municipalities must be and structural change have ultimately remained un- successively deepened. That will require more state- successful. level agreements and a joint committee of the state parliaments. Not least, inter-municipal cooperation Outlook: It is high time to clarify and optimise the re- on specific issues and in particular spaces (such as lationship between the city administration and the settlement axes) must be strengthened. The objective boroughs – and the distribution of tasks within the is continuous consultation and coordination on indi- boroughs. Within the city government, integrative vidual issues and overarching paradigms and strate- planning approaches and implementation strategies gies. That means strengthening existing cooperation must be strengthened and planning processes acce- platforms and considering the creation of new ones. lerated. That will require an amendment to the state As well as representatives of municipalities and the constitution and an administrative reform. The city two states, strategic cooperation should include re- administration should be responsible for strategic presentatives of business and civil society. In the lon- tasks of regional scope like the main centres, roads ger term fusion of the two states should be put back and squares, major green spaces, the integration of on the table. major projects and the construction of larger housing developments. The ground needs to be prepared for a Fine-tune democratic comprehensive centres programme in the boroughs. 14 cooperation Continue developing Starting point: Greater Berlin was always a centre 13 a robust and – and product – of political protest and civil society durable relationship engagement. Powerful grassroots movements in West Berlin (beginning in the 1970s) and East Berlin and between Berlin Brandenburg (beginning in the 1980) placed the rela- and Brandenburg tionship between politics, government, business and civil society firmly on the agenda.

Starting point: The administrative separation of Ber- Outlook: Urban development programmes require so- lin from its hinterland dates from 1881, when the city lid democratic foundations. So democratic platforms left the association of Brandenburg municipalities. are central to empowering the relationship between While the Greater Berlin Act of 1920 encouraged ins- Berlin’s city government and its boroughs, and the titutional cooperation between Berlin and Branden- cooperation between Berlin and Brandenburg. Civil burg, this was never realised. Subsequently, during society and business initiatives and institutions must the Nazi era and in the GDR, both administrative enti- be integrated in all strategic discourses – and must ties were de facto abolished. Although a plan to merge contribute constructively and responsibly. One good Signed by:

Prof. Dr. Harald Bodenschatz Kurator „Unvollendete Metropole“

Tobias Nöfer Vorsitzender des Architekten- und Ingenieurvereins zu Berlin-Brandenburg e.V.

Dr. Christian Strauß Leiter der Lenkungsgruppe der Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Berlin / Brandenburg / Mecklenburg-Vorpommern der Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft

Julia Dahlhaus und Hans-Joachim Paap Vorsitzende und stellvertretender Vorsitzender des Bundes Deutscher Architektinnen und Architekten BDA, Landesverband Berlin e.V.

Reiner Nagel Bundesstiftung Baukultur

Aljoscha Hofmann Generalsekretär des Council for European Urbanism Deutschland C.E.U.D. e.V.

Dr. Friedemann Kunst Vorsitzender der Landesgruppe Berlin-Brandenburg der Deutschen Akademie für Städtebau und Landesplanung

Tim Heide Vorsitzender des Deutschen Werkbunds Berlin

Dr. Thomas Flierl Vorsitzender der Hermann-Henselmann-Stiftung

Matthias von Popowski Geschäftsstelle des Kommunalen Nachbarschaftsforums Berlin-Brandenburg e.V.

Stefan Richter Geschäftsführender Vorstand der Stiftung Zukunft Berlin

Ingolf Berger, Annemarie Schnerrer, Dr. Christian Strauß und Thomas Thurn Sprecherinnen und Sprecher der Regionalgruppe Berlin / Brandenburg der Vereinigung für Stadt-, Regional- und Landesplanung e.V.