DOCSLIB.ORG

EMMA Official Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NEW ISSUE – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s: Aaa Standard & Poor’s: AAA See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the District, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2019 Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. Bond Counsel further observes that interest on the Taxable Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the 2019 Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS” $643,500,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $313,205,000 $205,100,000 (ELECTION OF 2016), (ELECTION OF 2004), 2019 SERIES B-1 2019 SERIES F-1 (GREEN BONDS) (GREEN BONDS) $46,795,000 $34,900,000 (ELECTION OF 2016), (ELECTION OF 2004), 2019 SERIES B-2 (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) 2019 SERIES F-2 (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) (GREEN BONDS) $43,500,000 (ELECTION OF 2004), 2019 REFUNDING SERIES G (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on inside cover The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2016), 2019 Series B-1 (Green Bonds) (the “2019B-1 Bonds”) and 2019 Series B-2 (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) (the “2019B-2 Bonds” and, together with the 2019B-1 Bonds, the “2019B Bonds”) are being issued to finance specific acquisition, construction and improvement projects for District facilities approved by the voters and to pay the costs of issuance of the 2019B Bonds. The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2004), 2019 Series F-1 (Green Bonds) (the “2019F-1 Bonds”) and 2019 Series F-2 (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) (the “2019F-2 Bonds” and, together with the 2019F-1 Bonds, the “2019F Bonds”) are being issued to finance specific earthquake safety improvements to District facilities in Contra Costa, San Francisco, and Alameda Counties and to pay the costs of issuance of the 2019F Bonds. The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2004), 2019 Refunding Series G (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) (the “2019G Bonds”) are being issued to refund certain outstanding general obligation bonds of the District and to pay the costs of issuance of the 2019G Bonds. The 2019B-1 Bonds and the 2019F-1 Bonds shall collectively be known as the “Tax-Exempt Bonds,” the 2019B-2 Bonds, the 2019F-2 Bonds and the 2019G Bonds shall collectively be known as the “Taxable Bonds,” and the 2019B Bonds, the 2019F Bonds and the 2019G Bonds shall collectively be known as the “2019 Bonds.” The 2019 Bonds are deliverable in fully registered form and, when issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”). Individual purchases of the 2019 Bonds will be made in principal amounts of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof and will be in book-entry form only. Purchasers of the 2019 Bonds will not receive bonds representing their beneficial ownership in the 2019 Bonds but will receive a credit balance on the books of their respective DTC Direct Participants or DTC Indirect Participants. The 2019 Bonds will not be transferable or exchangeable except for transfer to another nominee of DTC or as otherwise described herein. Principal on the 2019 Bonds is payable in the amounts and on the dates set forth on the inside cover. Interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds and the 2019G Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2020, and interest on the 2019B-2 Bonds and the 2019F-2 Bonds is paid on the maturity date thereof. The principal of the 2019 Bonds is payable by U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, to Cede & Co., the registered owner of the 2019 Bonds, and such interest and principal payments are to be disbursed to the beneficial owners of the 2019 Bonds through their respective DTC Direct Participants or DTC Indirect Participants. The 2019 Bonds are general obligations of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (the “District”), payable from and secured by ad valorem taxes to be levied upon all property subject to taxation by the District, without limitation as to rate or amount (except for certain personal property which is taxable at limited rates) levied in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties and the City and County of San Francisco, as more fully described herein. No other revenues of the District other than certain proceeds of the 2019 Bonds are pledged to the payment of the 2019 Bonds. The Tax-Exempt Bonds and the 2019G Bonds are subject to optional and mandatory redemption prior to maturity as described herein. This cover page contains certain information for reference only. It is not a summary of this issue. Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. The 2019 Bonds are offered when, as and if issued by the District and received by the Underwriters, subject to the approving opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel to the District. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriters by their counsel, Curls Bartling P.C., and for the District by its General Counsel, Matthew Burrows, Esq., and by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, as Disclosure Counsel to the District. The 2019 Bonds in book-entry-only form are expected to be delivered through the facilities of DTC on or about August 14, 2019. Morgan Stanley Citigroup Siebert Cisneros Shank & Co., L.L.C. J.P. Morgan Stifel Backstrom McCarley Berry & Co., LLC Raymond James Dated: July 30, 2019 MATURITY SCHEDULES $313,205,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (ELECTION OF 2016), 2019 SERIES B-1 BONDS (GREEN BONDS) $165,375,000 SERIAL BONDS Maturity CUSIP Date Principal Interest (Base: (August 1) Amount Rate Yield 797661)‡ 2020 $5,440,000 5.000% 0.870% XH3 2021 5,265,000 5.000 0.880 XJ9 2022 5,525,000 5.000 0.890 XK6 2023 5,800,000 5.000 0.900 XL4 2024 6,090,000 5.000 0.920 XM2 2025 6,395,000 5.000 1.000 XN0 2026 6,715,000 5.000 1.080 XP5 2027 7,050,000 5.000 1.200 XQ3 2028 7,405,000 5.000 1.280 XR1 2029 7,775,000 5.000 1.380 XS9 2030 8,165,000 5.000 1.480* XT7 2031 8,570,000 5.000 1.570 XU4 2032 9,000,000 5.000 1.680 XV2 2033 9,450,000 5.000 1.750 XW0 2034 9,925,000 5.000 1.810 XX8 2035 10,420,000 5.000 1.890 XY6 2036 10,940,000 4.000 2.170 XZ3 2037 11,380,000 4.000 2.240 YA7 2038 7,805,000 3.000 2.670 YC3 2038 4,030,000 4.000 2.280 YB5 2039 7,130,000 3.000 2.740 YE9 2039 5,100,000 4.000 2.320 YD1 $37,750,000 4.000% Term Bonds due August 1, 2044; Yield 2.530%; CUSIP‡ 797661YF6 $110,080,000 3.000% Term Bonds due August 1, 2049; Yield 3.000%; CUSIP‡ 797661YG4 $46,795,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (ELECTION OF 2016), 2019 SERIES B-2 BONDS (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) Maturity CUSIP Date Principal Interest (Base: (September 15) Amount Rate Yield 797661)‡ 2019 $46,795,000 2.158% 2.158% WY7 ‡ CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP Global Services (CGS) is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Copyright © 2019 CUSIP Global Services. All rights reserved. CUSIP® data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CGS database. CUSIP numbers are provided for convenience only and neither the District nor the Underwriters takes any responsibility for the accuracy thereof. The CUSIP numbers are subject to being changed after the issuance of the 2019 Bonds as a result of various subsequent actions, including, but not limited to, a refunding, in whole or in part of the 2019 Bonds. * Yield to the par call date of August 1, 2029. $205,100,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (ELECTION OF 2004), 2019 SERIES F-1 BONDS (GREEN BONDS) Maturity CUSIP Date Principal Interest (Base: (August 1) Amount Rate Yield 797661)‡ 2022 $6,095,000 4.000% 0.890% YH2 2023 6,340,000 5.000 0.900 YJ8 2024 6,660,000 4.000 0.920 YK5 2025 6,925,000 5.000 1.000 YL3 2026 7,270,000 4.000 1.080 YM1 2027 7,560,000 5.000 1.200 YN9 2028 7,940,000 5.000 1.280 YP4 2029 9,260,000 5.000 1.380 YQ2 2030 9,735,000 5.000 1.480* YR0 2031 10,220,000 5.000 1.570 YS8 2032 10,725,000 5.000 1.680 YT6 2033 11,255,000 5.000 1.750 YU3 2034 11,820,000 5.000 1.810 YV1 2035 12,415,000 5.000 1.890 YW9 2036 13,635,000 3.000 2.520 YX7 2037 14,180,000 3.000 2.600 YY5 2038 53,065,000 3.000 2.670 YZ2 $34,900,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (ELECTION OF 2004), 2019 SERIES F-2 BONDS (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) Maturity CUSIP Date Principal Interest (Base: (September 15) Amount Rate Yield 797661) ‡ 2019 $34,900,000 2.158% 2.158% WZ4 ‡ CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association.
Recommended publications
  • BART 2016 Factsheet

    BART 2016 Factsheet

    BART 2016 Factsheet Connecting People to Opportunity BART by the Numbers For over four decades, BART has been an efficient, reliable way for families, friends, and commuters to • BART estimates ridership in FY16 safely reach their destinations. What started out as a futuristic dream in 1972 — then carrying only will average 430,000 trips on 100,000 passengers per week— has now grown to be a vital part of the regional culture and economy. weekdays and 129 million trips annually. However, as the Bay Area’s population swells, BART faces the challenge of upgrading and updating its • During peak commute hours, over nearly half century old infrastructure to meet the needs of a modern transit system. BART’s highly skilled 60,000 people ride through the and dedicated workforce is putting enormous effort into developing a plan for the future, and we are Transbay Tube in each direction. excited to work together toward a new era for BART transit. • BART’s Pittsburg/Bay Point (yellow) line carries the largest AMTRAK SAN JOAQUIN number of people. Pittsburg Center Station Antioch Station Richmond Pittsburg/Bay Point El Cerrito del Norte • Embarcadero and Montgomery North Concord/Martinez El Cerrito Plaza stations are the busiest in the Concord North Berkeley Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre BART system. In FY15, over Downtown Berkeley Walnut Creek 170,000 trips were made to or Ashby Lafayette from these stations each weekday. Orinda Rockridge MacArthur TIMED TRANSFER (SOUTHBOUND) • Our top ridership day last year West Oakland 19th St/Oakland TIMED TRANSFER (NORTHBOUND) 12th St/Oakland City Center was June 19, 2015 for the SAN FRANCISCO Embarcadero Lake Merritt EAST BAY Warriors Championship Parade Montgomery St Fruitvale Powell St and A’s game —548,076 trips! Coliseum TRANSFER FOR SERVICE TO OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Civic Center/UN Plaza MUNI METRO San Leandro • BART directly serves SFO and Bay Fair 16th St Mission Castro Valley Dublin/Pleasanton OAK, the nation’s 7th and 35th 24th St Mission Glen Park Oakland busiest airports.
  • Minutes of the Joint Planning Commission

    Minutes of the Joint Planning Commission

    Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Strategy Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting 8 Meeting Notes November 14, 2006 6:37 p.m. – CALL TO ORDER Attendance CAC Members Present: Alcantar, Brannan, Chi, Collier, Cuellas, Finberg, Free, Helmbrecht, Hopkinson, Houston, Kaplan, Markham, Mobley-Maundu, Raposo, Stensgard, Talley, Tannam, Trujillo, Ward CAC Members Absent: Flynn, Kleebauer, Sidari, Sykes, Storer Staff: Hanson Hom, Community Development Director, Kathleen Livermore, Senior Planner and TOD Project Manager Other: Michael Smiley, BMS Design Group, Tim Hurley, BMS Design Group, Jim Daisa, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Item 1: Welcome Anna Brannan, CAC Chair, opened the meeting and asked that both CAC members and members of the public sign in. Mayor Elect Tony Santos welcomed the Committee members and noted he recognized quite a few folks. He extended his personal appreciation for the work of the CAC. Mayor Elect Santos stated that the downtown is the heart of the community and this plan is vitally important for San Leandro and the future. This plan can help provide the essential critical mass and be a catalyst for development in the downtown. Mayor Elect Santos stressed the importance of evaluating noise impacts of any proposed development in the study area as he had heard from many residents in noise impacted areas during his campaign. He also stressed the importance of providing parks and open space in the downtown. Mayor Elect Santos noted that people will have to learn how to get out of their cars to make a successful pedestrian friendly oriented downtown. He again expressed his appreciation for the commitment of time.
  • EMMA Official Statement

    EMMA Official Statement

    NEW ISSUE – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s (2020 Bonds): Aaa Long Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-1 Bonds): AAA Short Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-2 Bonds): A-1+ See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the District, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. Bond Counsel further observes that interest on the 2020C-2 Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the 2020 Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS.” $700,000,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $625,005,000 $74,995,000 (ELECTION OF 2016), (ELECTION OF 2016), 2020 SERIES C-1 2020 SERIES C-2 (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) (GREEN BONDS) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on inside cover The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2016), 2020 Series C-1 (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-1 Bonds”) and 2020 Series C-2 (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-2 Bonds” and, together with the 2020C-1 Bonds, the “2020 Bonds”) are being issued to finance specific acquisition, construction and improvement projects for District facilities approved by the voters and to pay the costs of issuance of the 2020 Bonds.
  • Better Bart Better Bay Area Better Bart / Better Bay Area

    Better Bart Better Bay Area Better Bart / Better Bay Area

    BETTER BART BETTER BAY AREA BETTER BART / BETTER BAY AREA 2 2 BART SYSTEM—THEN AND NOW “The decision of the people to build a 3-county Bay Area rapid transit system is one of the most courageous and promising acts in modern American municipal history…” —San Francisco Examiner, November 9, 1962 Pittsburg Center Station Antioch Station 1974 Today 3 3 MAKING A BETTER BAY AREA 4 4 BAY BRIDGE RUSH HOUR TRAFFIC *One “person” = 500 people. 2014 Caltrans and BART peak direction totals for peak hour, based on an average of non-holiday Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. Assumes 71% of vehicles use SOV lanes with average occupancy of 1.15 persons/car, and 29% of vehicles use HOV lanes with average occupancy of 2.65 persons/car, based on 2014 Bay Area Toll Authority data and 2012 Caltrans Bay Area Managed Lanes report. 55 5 MANAGEMENT & STEWARDSHIP Reliability is Improving Revenue Accountability is High Mean Time Between Service BART has historically had one of Disruption—Vehicle Caused the highest farebox ratios of all U.S. heavy rail 4,000 100% 3,000 80% 60% 2,000 40% 1,000 20% FAREBOX RATIO RECOVERY FAREBOX 0 0% HOURS BETWEEN DISRUPTION BETWEEN SERVICE HOURS BART WMATA NYCT Caltrain CTA MARTA Muni *National Transit Database (NTD) data, the source of these figures, excludes certain operating expenses, such as building leases, legal settlements, and Other Post Employment Benefits. 6 6 BUILDING A BETTER BART 7 7 LABOR RELATIONS 8 8 BART TO OAK AIRPORT • 3.2-mile extension from Coliseum Station to the Oakland International Airport • Automated, driverless
  • View Reducing Parking at Transit Stations

    View Reducing Parking at Transit Stations

    Rail~Volution Salt Lake City, Utah 8-10 September, 2005 Reducing Parking at Transit Stations Jeffrey Tumlin EVALUATING PARKING AT TRANSIT STATIONS • Effects on transit ridership – Transit Oriented Development (TOD): New households & transit trips – Parking: Park-&-Ride participants – Implications for encouraging future growth in ridership • Effects on traffic congestion – Walking, cycling & transit trips to station – Proportion and amount of vehicle trips to station – Implications in allocating of street right-of-way • Effects on revenue generation – Lease or sale of land: Land value with higher density & mixed use compared to parking – Development of land: Joint development, economic vitality – Productive use of land: Economic productivity, sales tax Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING TRANSIT PARKING • SkyTrain system in Vancouver, BC (TransLink) – Land use concentration around SkyTrain – Transportation supply – Transportation demand including low to no parking • Metrorail stations in Arlington County, VA (WMATA) – Urban village development – Multimodal transportation – Shared parking only (No park-&-ride) • South Hayward station in Northern California (BART) – Plans to develop area around station and improve pedestrian, bicycle and bus access – Determining amount of replacement parking Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting TRANSLINK SKYTRAIN SYSTEM Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Greater Vancouver Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Canada – US BorderJeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Vancouver’s Regional Planning Context • GVTA Act – Support Livable Region Strategic Plan • Transport strategy aims to increase choice through 3 “levers” – Land use i.e. town centers, employment, , residential density – Transportation supply-side e.g rapid transit network – Transportation demand- side e.g.
  • Transportation Demand Management Plan

    Transportation Demand Management Plan

    SoHay Mixed Use Development Project Transportation Demand Management Plan Hayward, California February 28, 2018 SoHay Mixed Used Development Table of Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................1 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................1 Parking ...................................................................................................................................................2 Report Organization .............................................................................................................................3 Existing Transportation Facilities and Services ..................................................................................6 Transit Facilities .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 BART ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Bus Routes .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Bicycle Facilities ...................................................................................................................................................................
  • Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts

    Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts

    ffional Development BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with research assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich July 1995 University of California at Berkeley - 1 BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with Research Assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich This paper was produced with support provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through the University of California Transportation Center. University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development Table of Contents ONE: BART at 20: An Analysis of Land Use Impacts 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TWO: Research Approach and Data Sources 3 THREE: Employment and Population Changes in BART and Non-BART Areas 6 3.1. Population Changes 6 3.2. Employment Changes 3.3. Population Densities 15 3.4. Employment Densities 15 3.5. Summary 20 FOUR: Land Use Changes Over Time and by Corridor 21 4.1. General Land-Use Trends 23 4.2. Pre-BART versus Post-BART 25 4.3. Early versus Later BART 30 4.4. Trends in Non-Residential Densities 33 4.4. Summary 37 FIVE: Land-Use Changes by Station Classes 38 5.1. Grouping Variables 38 5.2. Classification 38 5.3. Station Classes 41 5.4. Trends in Residential and Non-Residential Growth Among Station Classes 44 5.5. Percent Growth in Early- versus Later-BART Years Among Station Classes 46 5.6. Trends in Non-Residential Densities Among Station Classes 46 SLX: Matched-Pair Comparisons of Land-Use Changes near BART Stations Versus Freeway Interchanges 51 6.1.
  • NNN Leased Strip Center, Value-Add Potential

    NNN Leased Strip Center, Value-Add Potential

    NNN Leased Strip Center, Value-Add Potential 3105 Railroad Ave Mary Alam, MBA Joshua Ballesteros Pittsburg, CA 94565 Senior Vice President Investment Advisor O: 415.358.2111 O: 415.480.0214 M: 415.297.5586 M: 209.518.9025 [email protected] [email protected] CalDRE #01927340 CalDRE #02010271 OFFERING MEMORANDUM Table Of Contents Table of Contents 3 Section 1 Property Information 6 Section 2 Location Information 14 Section 3 Financial Analysis 18 Section 4 Sale Comparables 25 Section 5 Rent Comparables 34 Section 6 Demographics Section 1 THE OFFERING 1 Property Description Property Overview NAI Northern California is pleased to present for sale this well located strip center with 10 retail units and NNN leases. The property benefits from its strategic location in an emerging retail corridor just 0.7 miles from the Pittsburg Bart station and the California Delta Highway-4. Railroad Avenue enjoys close to a 20,000 vehicles per day traffic count which further adds to the visibility of this retail property and its success. This busy retail corridor includes, among others, the Atlantic Plaza Shopping Center, which features a wide variety of vendors such as FoodsCo, CVS, Goodwill, McDonald's, USPS, Little Caesar's, Mountain Mike's, Jackson Hewitt Tax and more Location Overview The subject is located on busy Railroad Avenue in Pittsburg, minutes from the Pittsburg Bart Station and busy Highway 4. It enjoys strong demographics of approximately 150,000 people within a five mile radius with an average household income of approximately $82,000 per year. Population growth within five miles has been phenomenal at nearly 12% between 2010 and 2018 and projected to be close to 6% in the next five years.
  • BART FY19 Short Range Transit Plan/Capital Improvement Program

    BART FY19 Short Range Transit Plan/Capital Improvement Program

    BUILDING A BETTER BART BUILDING A BETTER BART FY19 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OCTOBER 2018 San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Robert Raburn, President, Board of Directors Grace Crunican, General Manager Short Range Transit Plan and Capital Improvement Program Federal transportation statutes require that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), in partnership with state and local agencies, develop and periodically update a long-range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) that implements the RTP by programming federal funds to transportation projects contained in the RTP. To effectively execute these planning and programming responsibilities, MTC requires that each transit operator in its region that receives federal funding through the TIP prepare, adopt, and submit to MTC a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) that includes a Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Schedule, cost, and performance data used to generate this SRTP/CIP were based upon the most current information available as of October 2018. July 2018 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1 2 Overview of the BART System ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 History ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Governance ..............................................................................................................
  • TRI Del1i4 TRANSIT Eastt';)Rn Contra Costa Trms!T Autflority 801 Wiibur Avenue• Antioch, California 94509 Phone

    TRI Del1i4 TRANSIT Eastt';)Rn Contra Costa Trms!T Autflority 801 Wiibur Avenue• Antioch, California 94509 Phone

    TRI DEL1i4 TRANSIT Eastt';)rn Contra Costa TrMs!t Autflority 801 Wiibur Avenue• Antioch, California 94509 Phone. 92S;7S4.6622. Fax 92.5.757.253() Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Wednesday October 31'\ 2018 4:00pm ECCTA Boardroom 801 Wilbur Avenue, Antioch, CA 94509 Available online: www.trideltatransit.com . Please see the last page of this agenda for: • Public comment guidelines • Agenda, staff report, and document availability • Americans with Disabilities Act information • Anticipated action by the Board of Directors 1. Call to Order: Chair Diane Burgis a. Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance rr=~~~~~~==~~~~~===;i Board of Directors: While public comments are encouraged and taken very seriously, State law City of Antioch prevents the Board of Directors from discussing items that are not on the 3. Public Comment meeting agenda. If appropriate, staff will follow up on public comments, Lamar Thorpe Please see Public Comment Guidelines on Page 3 of this agenda. Monica Wilson City of Brentwood 4. Chair's Report: Chair Diane Burgis Barbara Guise RobertTaylor•• 5. Consent Calendar (ACTION ITEM): Minutes, Financial Report, and City of Oakley Doug Ha rd castle Marketing Activities Report (see attachment: tab # 1) Kevin Romick a. Minutes of the Board of Directors meeting of August 22"ct, 2018 b. Financial Report City of Pittsburg c. Marketing Activities Report Merl Craft Pete Longmire Requested Action: Approve items Sa, Sb, and Sc Contra Costa County Diane Burgis* 6. CEO's Report: Jeanne Krieg Federal Glover a. Operations Report (see attachment: tab #2) Member-at-Large b. First Transit Ken Gray * Chair: FY 2018-19 ** Vice-chair: FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 3 Board of Directors Meeting Agenda 51 Wednesday October 31 , 2018 7.
  • SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA TRANSIT DISTRICT ACCESSIBILITY TASK FORCE Draft Minutes April 23, 2015

    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA TRANSIT DISTRICT ACCESSIBILITY TASK FORCE Draft Minutes April 23, 2015

    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA TRANSIT DISTRICT ACCESSIBILITY TASK FORCE Draft Minutes April 23, 2015 1. Self-Introductions of Members, Staff and Guests Members present: Janet Abelson, Janice Armigo Brown, Peter Crockwell, Don Queen, Hale Zukas, Clarence Fischer, Gerry Newell, Herb Hastings, Alan Smith, Larry Bunn, Brandon Young, Roland Wong, Linda Drattell Absent: Randall Glock, Marina Villena, Megan O’Brien, BART Staff present: Ike Nnaji, Bob Franklin Directors, Speaker(s), Guest Staff, and Guests of the Public: Director Robert Raburn, Sadie Graham (BART), Khawaja Zubair (BART), Balvir Thind (BART), Mac Gines (BART), David Vasquez (BART), Elena Vanloo (BART), Russell Bloom (OIPA), Farrah Nolan (ASL Interpreter), Esperanza Diaz-Alvarez, Yu Dian He, Jerry Grace, Christian Johnson (ASL Interpreter), Janice Dispo (Stenographer) 2. Public Comments [No public comments.] 3. Approval of Minutes of March 26, 2015 Meeting No opposition to Herb Hastings’ motion to approve the March 26, 2015 meeting minutes, with a second by Roland Wong. Motion passes with one abstention from Clarence Fischer. 4. Concord Station Upgrade After the presentation given by Sadie Graham, members were allowed to ask questions and/or share any concerns they had. Some of the concerns to be followed up on: - whether additional surveillance cameras will be installed, especially in parking lots and along path of travel - whether concrete benches will remain; if so, they need some contrast - shallow curb cut on the sidewalk in front of garage 5. MacArthur Station Asbestos Removal Project After the presentation given by Bob Franklin, members were allowed to ask questions and/or share any concerns they had. 6. Police Auditor Braille Brochure After the presentation by Russell Bloom, he mentioned that the creation of the Braille brochures was inspired by the BATF and its members.
  • 18-311 ,:/1 Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 Alameda-Contracosta Transit District

    18-311 ,:/1 Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 Alameda-Contracosta Transit District

    ReportNo: 18-311 ,:/1 Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 Alameda-ContraCosta Transit District STAFF RE PO RT TO: ACTransit Board of Directors FROM: Michael A. Hursh, General Manager SUBJECT: Operator Restroomsat BARTStations ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) Consider authorizing the GeneraIManager to negotiate and execute an agreement with the Bay Area RapidTransit District (BART)for the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of Operator restrooms. BUDGETARY/FISCAL IMPACT This project will be added to the current fiscal year Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planwith $638,826 in District Capital funds. Capital Planning and Grants will continue to seek externalfunding to support this project. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE AC Transit provides fixed route serviceto and from many Bay Area RapidTransit District IBART) stations located in the East Bay.AC Transit Operators and Road Supervisors rely on the ability to utilize BART station restroom facilities during a scheduled break. On several occasions, employees were not able to use the public restrooms because of long lines or the restroom being closed for repairs. At the April 4, 2018 BART/AC Transit Interagency Liaison Committee jtLC) both agencies agreed to collaborate on developing a process to provide restroom access for AC Transit personnelat BARTstations. Station Restroom Assessment Staff conducted an assessmentof fourteen BART stations where AC Transit buses have scheduled layovers and are utilized by District employees for restroom breaks during the peak period between 3:00pm and 9:00pm. Listed on the table below are the BARTstations with the highest amount of buses scheduled for layover during the evening: 1 of 23 Report No. 18-311 Page2 of4 BARTStation LayoversPerPeak Period Fruitvale fremont Bay Fair West Oakland Coliseum EI Cerrito Plaza SanLeandro The following BARTstations were determined to be least utilized with lessthan 25 scheduled busesthat layover: DeINorte, South Hayward, Castro Valley, Richmond and North Berkeley.