18-311 ,:/1 Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 Alameda-Contracosta Transit District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

18-311 ,:/1 Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 Alameda-Contracosta Transit District ReportNo: 18-311 ,:/1 Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 Alameda-ContraCosta Transit District STAFF RE PO RT TO: ACTransit Board of Directors FROM: Michael A. Hursh, General Manager SUBJECT: Operator Restroomsat BARTStations ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) Consider authorizing the GeneraIManager to negotiate and execute an agreement with the Bay Area RapidTransit District (BART)for the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of Operator restrooms. BUDGETARY/FISCAL IMPACT This project will be added to the current fiscal year Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planwith $638,826 in District Capital funds. Capital Planning and Grants will continue to seek externalfunding to support this project. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE AC Transit provides fixed route serviceto and from many Bay Area RapidTransit District IBART) stations located in the East Bay.AC Transit Operators and Road Supervisors rely on the ability to utilize BART station restroom facilities during a scheduled break. On several occasions, employees were not able to use the public restrooms because of long lines or the restroom being closed for repairs. At the April 4, 2018 BART/AC Transit Interagency Liaison Committee jtLC) both agencies agreed to collaborate on developing a process to provide restroom access for AC Transit personnelat BARTstations. Station Restroom Assessment Staff conducted an assessmentof fourteen BART stations where AC Transit buses have scheduled layovers and are utilized by District employees for restroom breaks during the peak period between 3:00pm and 9:00pm. Listed on the table below are the BARTstations with the highest amount of buses scheduled for layover during the evening: 1 of 23 Report No. 18-311 Page2 of4 BARTStation LayoversPerPeak Period Fruitvale fremont Bay Fair West Oakland Coliseum EI Cerrito Plaza SanLeandro The following BARTstations were determined to be least utilized with lessthan 25 scheduled busesthat layover: DeINorte, South Hayward, Castro Valley, Richmond and North Berkeley. BART installed the sign below for these stations on the public restroom door in July 2018. PLEASE GIVE PRIORITY TO ACTRANSIT BUS OPERATORS FOR USE OF THIS BATHROOM for the busiest stations, BARTsent out an Engineering and Building Maintenance team to look at site specific solutions. They considered four options: portable restroom, portable trailer, metal building extension and conversion of an existing room to a dedicated AC Transit restroom. BART provided AC Transit with a preferred option and budget for eight of the stations: BARTStation Recommended Options Cost fruitvale Midi Existing Room $60,638 Haywa rd Mod Existing Room $45,870 Rockridge Mod Existing Room $34,128 EI Cerrito Plaza Mod Existing Room $45,870 Fremont Install Restroom Bld Sill,100 Bay Fair Install Restroom Bldg $115,060 West Oakland Install Restroom Bldg Coliseum Install Restroom Bld *A restroom in San Leandro will be constructed as part of the existing San Leandro BART Terminal project. 2 of 23 Report No.18-3].1 Page3 of4 Details of the site-specific solution for each station and the associated cost are included in Attachment 1: ,4CTrans/t /?estroomsand D/str/ct Stat/ons, .August20.28. Agreement Terms Terms of the agreement mutually proposed by BARTand AC Transit staffinclude: e Agreement amount: o BARTwill only invoice ACTransit $638,826.00 to design and construct the site specific solution for eight of the stations. o BARTwill invoice ACTransit for the actual cost of ongoing operation and maintenance of the restrooms. e ACTransit Responsibilities: o Cooperate with BARTin planning, designing, and engineering,constructing, and implementing the restroom project. o Pay the amount related to the construction of restrooms per '4C Trans/t /?estrooms and D/strict Stat/ons, August 20:Z8 (Attachment 1) and on a construction schedule to be determined by both parties. o Pay forthe ongoing operation and maintenance costs of the restrooms. e BARTResponsibilities: o Designand construct the restrooms, including all permitting, contract administration, procurement, construction administration and managementservices. o Daily cleaning and maintenance of the restrooms including supplying related materials such as toilet paper, paper towels, soap, etc. and making any necessary repairs to the restrooms. o Provide ACTransit personnel with exclusive accessto the restrooms. ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES The advantage of entering into an agreement with BARTis the District willbe able to provide its personnelaccess to clean, comfortable, safe, and conveniently located restrooms at various BART stations. BARTplans to utilize its own staff to design and construct the restrooms resulting in a significant cost reduction as compared to contracting this work to an outside firm. ALTERNATIVESANALYSIS There are no other feasible alternatives since BARTowns the properties at the stations PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION/POLICIES There are no prior Board action/policies 3 of 23 Report No. 18-311 Page4 of4 A'nACHMENTS 1. ACTransit Restrooms and District Stations, August 2018 2. Draft Agreement Approved by: Salvador Llamas,Chief Operating Officer Reviewedby: Ramakrishna Porchiraju, Executive Director of Planning and Engineering DeniseStandridge, GeneralCounsel ClaudiaAllen, Chief FinancialOfficer Robert del Rosario, Director of Service Development and Planning Derik Calhoun,Director of Transportation Joe Callaway,Director of CapitalProjects Chris Andrichak, Director of Management and Budget EvelynNg, CapitalPlanning and Grants Manager Preparedby: SalvadorLlamas, Chief Operating Officer 4 of 23 SR18-311 Attachment I AC Transit H.!:: Restrooms at District Stations August 2018 Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 5 of 23 Types of Restrooms Options Considered Currently being implemented at Daly City by B. PortableTrailer- Not Preferred SamTrans for their drivers' use - Not Preferred C Metal building extension constructed by M&E D. Convert Existing Rooms -- Preferred Concept PreferredConcept Exterior Interior Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 6 of 23 Rockridge Station Modify Existing Room Pros: Unobtrusive-Within Station Footprint Low Construction Costs l 0 l UtilitiesClose Proximity l STREET LEVEL PLAN l l l Cons: l l l AccessNot ADA l l l l LimitedSpace l l l ImpactsTraining Room Size ll l l Cost: l l l l $34.128 l l l l l l l l l l Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 7 of 23 Fruitvale Station Next to Break Room Pros: Unobtrusive(Within Station Footprint) All Utilities Within Close Proximity nd LowConstruction Costs Cons: Entrance Not Directly Adjacent to Bus LayoverArea Cost: $60,638 May have to relocate Emergency AccessDoors (AdditionalCost Approx. $7,5001) Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 8 of 23 Built UnderExisting Staircase Low Maintenance Utilitiesin CloseProximity .='''''''L. Close to Bus Layover Area Cons: Low VisibilityUnder Stairs . e$ 11s,060 ;# l P 'q Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 5 9 of 23 Hayward Station Modify Janitor Room Pros: Unobtrusive(WithinStation Footprint) All UtilitiesWithin Close Proximity Close to Bus Layover Areas Low Construction Costs Cons: . LimitedSpace Cost: $45,870 0 n £ CONCOURSELEVEL PLAN Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 10 of 23 Fremont Station Metal Building Pros: Utilitief$rith:inClose Proximity Cl#gejTd $1idhlvTrafficked Area Cobb;: .I .SecurityCohcerns Cost: $111,100 l ! . ldl;';=:g'} b @ N -Lw:-w 0 Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 7 11 of 23 Coliseum Station Metal Building (n (a Pros: ? X T T \ Outside Fence Unobtrusive Close to bus layover area -:h Enclosedwithin fence I Hill P BUS \ Utilities in close proximity Cons: Out of sight of station agent E }'4 Keyrequiredto entergated area Cost: $116,380 h Entrance lliH j Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 8 12 of 23 San Leandro Station Proposed BRT Project/ AC Transit Breakroom Pros BUS f.#Y ;.F.;e.\-rJ'q--PW-q,dAC Transit has included a w' r .;:: #.}.M&ig permanent breakroom in the + design of the BRT project expandingthe intermodal Cons :W@"wel + Timing of the project is dependentonfunding and = 1 61 AC Transit schedule 1: \!ii& U Cost iiiliig:n ia#i#hl.€ETW;'Rtittdml Included in AC Transit BRT P' 13q P' ! {tR= +.}{ L;&;'] ''a Project ;etl:i.gr''t..:a+ LEGEND i'#"".t I PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1 1 PROPOSED BREAK Room :Qlt.lt&F$:eiA: H NOTE: THIS OPTION TO BE [ I PROPOSED LAHDSCAPiNC Ey:l!$$ ''#;Wiglt@$WtFfl:%Ehir#rm:& :ig:l PROPOSED CENTER BRT CANarY CONSTRUCTEDBYAC TRANSIT CENTER BUS STOPS b&w&u'b..%%w#«&, TRANSITPROJECI H TRAFFIC SIGNAL 'q ly=8.' ! Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 9 13 of 23 West Oakland Station Metal Building Pros: All utilitieswithin close proximity Close to bus layover area High security Cons: Limitedspace \. Nearentrance gates ? ? 9 Cost: ! ! ««h $109,780 Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 10 14 of 23 EI Cerrito Plaza Station Modify Trash Room Pros: Unobtrusive- within station footprint All utilities already within room Cons: Lockersneedto be relocated Needto create new door to outsideoffare area Cost: $45,870 Integration Engineering & Buildings Maintenance 1 1 15 of 23 Stations Identified and Preferred Options with Cost Station Option Estimated Cost*+ RockridgeStation Modify Room $34,128 FruitvaleStation Modify Room $60,638 Bayfair Station Metal Bldg. $115,060 HaywardStation Modify Room $45,870 FremontStation Metal Bldg. $111,100 ColiseumStation Metal Bldg. $116,380 San LeandroStation BRT Project AC Transit BRT Project Cost West Oakland Station Metal Bldg. $109,780 EI Cerrito
Recommended publications
  • Bicycle Master Plan in 2007
    CITY OF HAYWARD BICYCLE MASTER PLAN October 2007 Prepared by Alta Planning + Design This page left blank intentionally. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1. Why Bicycling?.............................................................................................................................1-1 1.2. Purpose of the Bicycle Master Plan ...........................................................................................1-1 1.3. Summary of Changes between 1997 and 2006 Plans ...............................................................1-2 1.4. Plan Contents...............................................................................................................................1-4 2. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2. Goals and Objectives...................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1. New Facilities...............................................................................................................................2-1 2.2. Bicycle Commuting and Recreational Opportunities ...............................................................2-1 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. Existing Conditions......................................................................................................................................3-1 3.1. Setting...........................................................................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7
    Services Transit Outreach Materials Distribution Light Rail Station Maintenance and Inspection Photography—Capture Metadata and GPS Marketing Follow-Up Programs Service Locations Dallas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis/Saint Paul San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area Our Customer Service Pledge Our pledge is to organize and act with precision to provide you with excellent customer service. We will do all this with all the joy that comes with the morning sun! “I slept and dreamed that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy. “Tagore Email: [email protected] Website: URBANMARKETINGCHANNELS.COM Urban Marketing Channel’s services to businesses and organizations in Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco, Oakland and the Twin Cities metro areas since 1981 have allowed us to develop a specialty client base providing marketing outreach with a focus on transit systems. Some examples of our services include: • Neighborhood demographic analysis • Tailored response and mailing lists • Community event monitoring • Transit site management of information display cases and kiosks • Transit center rider alerts • Community notification of construction and route changes • On-Site Surveys • Enhance photo and list data with geocoding • Photographic services Visit our website (www.urbanmarketingchannels.com) Contact us at [email protected] 612-239-5391 Bay Area Transit Sites (includes BART and AC Transit.) Prepared by Urban Marketing Channels ACT BART S ites by Region.csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7 UnSANtit
    [Show full text]
  • SBC Executivesummfac
    CAPITOL CORRIDOR SOUTH BAY CONNECT AUGUST 2020 Purpose Study Area and Project Elements South Bay Connect proposes to relocate the Capitol Corridor passenger rail service between the Oakland N Coliseum and Newark from the Union Pacific Railroad (UP) Niles Subdivision to the Coast Subdivision for a faster, more direct route. It will also create new transbay connections for passengers between the East Bay and Peninsula by connecting to bus and shuttle services at the Ardenwood Station. The project is not proposing an increase in Capitol Corridor service frequency or changes to UP’s freight service, but does not preclude service growth in the future. The relocation will facilitate the separation of passenger and freight rail, resulting in improved rail operations, efficiency, and reliability while minimizing rail congestion within the corridor. Proposed New Station and Railroad Potential Station Area Proposed Capitol Corridor (CC) Service Potential Station Considered and Eliminated Existing CC Service Existing Station CC Service to be Discontinued Station where CC Service Study Area to be Discontinued UP Improvement Area BART Station Benefits Reduce passenger rail travel time between Oakland and San Jose and throughout the larger megaregion to increase ridership on transit, ease congestion on the Bay Area’s stressed roadways, and decrease auto commutes. Diversify and enhance network integration by reducing duplicative capital investments and dif- ferentiating Capitol Corridor’s intercity rail service from commuter rail and other transit services, including BART’s extension to San Jose. Support economic vitality by permitting enhanced rail movement and the preservation of freight rail capacity in the Northern California market through the reduction of existing conflicts between freight rail operations and passenger rail service.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
    Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
    [Show full text]
  • A Nonprofit Organization, Based in Milpitas, Is Whittling Away At
    ‘Dance for Freedom’ Historic raises house moves Rock and human down the blues artists trafficking street take center awareness stage Page 39 Page 17 Page 14 Scan for our FREE App or Search App Store for TCVnews 510-494-1999 [email protected] www.tricityvoice.com January 23, 2018 Vol. 16 No. 4 Continued on page 5 SUBMITTED BY LEAH VIRSIK leries), Gladding Gallery at the Adobe Art Center, and Kenneth C. Aitken Senior Center. Adobe Art Gallery presents the works A.R.T., Inc. partners with Hayward of A.R.T., Inc. members in the upcoming Area Recreation and Park District exhibit “Anything Goes, Almost,” (H.A.R.D.) and provides support to featuring a variety of media including H.A.R.D.’s Adobe Art Gallery through two and three-dimensional art. its membership fees, newsletter, website, A.R.T., Inc. was founded in 1984 as art demonstrations, hands-on workshops, an association for artists to exchange and social events. ideas and exhibit their art. Fostering New to the Adobe Art Gallery, our connections between local artists and inaugural Artist-in-Residence Program art enthusiasts, A.R.T., Inc. provides features Philip Denst. Denst will create free art demonstrations for people of all snapshots of life in acrylic from ages and displays the work of its members photographs. From a portrait of a at six venues in Castro Valley. Members’ friend on a ferry trip to his cat Sylvester art has been displayed at Bank of the West, Castro Valley Library, Baywood Continued on page 20 Court Senior Community (three gal- BY JOHNNA M.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayward Transit Routes Map (PDF)
    Verdese Carter Rec. Ctr. Snow Bldg. Elmhurst NX3 98 Comm. Prep Hellman Transit Park ELMHURST Holly Elmhurst- 40 NXC Mini- Lyons Field 75 Dunsmuir Information Elmhurst INTERNATIONALPark BLVD 57 Foothill Plaza Square 45 East Bay House & 1 0 6 T H A V M V Gardens Lake Chabot A A Reg’l Parks 9 8 T H A V 45 C H Municipal A 08T BANCROFT AV R 1 Hq Golf Course 98 T H UR Hayward 45 1 0 4 T H A V B NX4 Dunsmuir Ridge LV D 75 Open Space Clubhouse NXC 0 0.5mi Station Durant Stonehurst D Square L V V A D M B Victoria A Park O O O R REVE R E EDE 1 0 5 T H A V B R Park S A Roosevelt V 45 Plgd. Farrelly NX3 0 0.5km Hayward SAN LEANDRO BLVD 1 75 Shefeld 45 Pool Rec. Ctr. San Leandro BART N McCartney 75 Milford Park Park SHEFFIELD Tyrone D U T T O N A V 1 10 75 85 89 Carney 75 Onset A 40 VILLAGE Map Key Park C Park A Chabot L R A E E 1 4 T H S T Park Shuttles NL SL N N D E You Are Here S Vets. W D Siempre R O 75 Mem. G Verde Park O R BART D Bldg. A D 45 City N Willow Park BART Memorial R R CAPISTRANO DR D Hall Bancroft T D L A O Public R Park B C A L L A N A V A K D Root Library Mid.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • BART Hayward Station Closure Monday, February 6Th, 2017
    BART Hayward Station Closure Monday, February 6th, 2017 5:04 PM There is a station closure and trains are holding out at Hayward station due to police activity. -- 6:00 PM There is a 10-minute delay between 24th St. Mission and Balboa Park on the Daly City Line in the SFO, Millbrae and East Bay directions due to an equipment problem on the track. There is a station closure and trains are holding out at Hayward station due to police activity. There is a major delay at Hayward on the Fremont Line in the Fremont, Richmond and Daly City directions due to police activity. Parallel service is available via AC Transit. Bus #10 between Hayward and Bayfair. Bus#99 from Hayward to South Hayward and beyond. -- 6:30 PM There is a 10-minute delay between 24th St. Mission and Balboa Park on the Daly City Line in the SFO, Millbrae and East Bay directions due to an equipment problem on the track. This advisory is sent in the event anyone is still in their office monitoring BART progress tonight. There is a station closure and trains are holding out at Hayward station due to police activity. There is a major delay at Hayward on the Fremont Line in the Fremont, Richmond and Daly City directions due to police activity. Parallel service is available via AC Transit. Bus #10 between Hayward and Bayfair. Bus#99 from Hayward to South Hayward and beyond. There is a major delay on the Richmond Line in the Fremont direction due to police activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Joint Planning Commission
    Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Strategy Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting 8 Meeting Notes November 14, 2006 6:37 p.m. – CALL TO ORDER Attendance CAC Members Present: Alcantar, Brannan, Chi, Collier, Cuellas, Finberg, Free, Helmbrecht, Hopkinson, Houston, Kaplan, Markham, Mobley-Maundu, Raposo, Stensgard, Talley, Tannam, Trujillo, Ward CAC Members Absent: Flynn, Kleebauer, Sidari, Sykes, Storer Staff: Hanson Hom, Community Development Director, Kathleen Livermore, Senior Planner and TOD Project Manager Other: Michael Smiley, BMS Design Group, Tim Hurley, BMS Design Group, Jim Daisa, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Item 1: Welcome Anna Brannan, CAC Chair, opened the meeting and asked that both CAC members and members of the public sign in. Mayor Elect Tony Santos welcomed the Committee members and noted he recognized quite a few folks. He extended his personal appreciation for the work of the CAC. Mayor Elect Santos stated that the downtown is the heart of the community and this plan is vitally important for San Leandro and the future. This plan can help provide the essential critical mass and be a catalyst for development in the downtown. Mayor Elect Santos stressed the importance of evaluating noise impacts of any proposed development in the study area as he had heard from many residents in noise impacted areas during his campaign. He also stressed the importance of providing parks and open space in the downtown. Mayor Elect Santos noted that people will have to learn how to get out of their cars to make a successful pedestrian friendly oriented downtown. He again expressed his appreciation for the commitment of time.
    [Show full text]
  • EMMA Official Statement
    NEW ISSUE – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s (2020 Bonds): Aaa Long Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-1 Bonds): AAA Short Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-2 Bonds): A-1+ See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the District, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. Bond Counsel further observes that interest on the 2020C-2 Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the 2020 Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS.” $700,000,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $625,005,000 $74,995,000 (ELECTION OF 2016), (ELECTION OF 2016), 2020 SERIES C-1 2020 SERIES C-2 (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) (GREEN BONDS) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on inside cover The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2016), 2020 Series C-1 (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-1 Bonds”) and 2020 Series C-2 (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-2 Bonds” and, together with the 2020C-1 Bonds, the “2020 Bonds”) are being issued to finance specific acquisition, construction and improvement projects for District facilities approved by the voters and to pay the costs of issuance of the 2020 Bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • It's Time for the 98Th Annual Rowell Ranch Rodeo!
    Blast off to D.C.! Newark Memorial Cool cars competes in Ballot Measures help chill Rocketry for Tri-City Voice Spring Fever Challenge voters June 5, 2018 Page 11 Page 5 Page 37 Scan for our FREE App or Search App Store for TCVnews 510-494-1999 [email protected] www.tricityvoice.com May 8, 2018 Vol. 16 No. 19 BY DAVID R. NEWMAN PHOTOS BY PHIL DOYLE Put on your boots and get ready to saddle up – it’s time for the 98th Annual Rowell Ranch Rodeo! Join folks from around the region as they gallop over to Castro Valley to celebrate the western lifestyle with a variety of events, including a chili cook-off, parade, cowgirl picnic, bull bash, and the rodeo itself. It all kicks off Friday evening May 11 with the Chili Cook-Off, an event hosted by the Rotary Club of Castro Valley and held at Rowell Ranch Rodeo Park in Dublin Canyon. Over 20 teams will compete for prize money and bragging rights. It’s sure to be a rootin’ tootin’ good time for all! The next day, come see the 36th Annual Rowell Ranch Rodeo Parade, also hosted by the Rotary Club. Spectators will be treated to a variety of floats, marching bands, car clubs, and horse contingents as community groups strut their stuff down Castro Valley Boulevard. Over 50 entries will be on display in this volunteer-run celebration of the region’s rural roots. It’s also a chance to see Becka Savery, this year’s Rodeo Queen, a 24-year-old from Hayward who will help promote the rodeo in the coming year.
    [Show full text]
  • View Reducing Parking at Transit Stations
    Rail~Volution Salt Lake City, Utah 8-10 September, 2005 Reducing Parking at Transit Stations Jeffrey Tumlin EVALUATING PARKING AT TRANSIT STATIONS • Effects on transit ridership – Transit Oriented Development (TOD): New households & transit trips – Parking: Park-&-Ride participants – Implications for encouraging future growth in ridership • Effects on traffic congestion – Walking, cycling & transit trips to station – Proportion and amount of vehicle trips to station – Implications in allocating of street right-of-way • Effects on revenue generation – Lease or sale of land: Land value with higher density & mixed use compared to parking – Development of land: Joint development, economic vitality – Productive use of land: Economic productivity, sales tax Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING TRANSIT PARKING • SkyTrain system in Vancouver, BC (TransLink) – Land use concentration around SkyTrain – Transportation supply – Transportation demand including low to no parking • Metrorail stations in Arlington County, VA (WMATA) – Urban village development – Multimodal transportation – Shared parking only (No park-&-ride) • South Hayward station in Northern California (BART) – Plans to develop area around station and improve pedestrian, bicycle and bus access – Determining amount of replacement parking Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting TRANSLINK SKYTRAIN SYSTEM Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Greater Vancouver Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Canada – US BorderJeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Vancouver’s Regional Planning Context • GVTA Act – Support Livable Region Strategic Plan • Transport strategy aims to increase choice through 3 “levers” – Land use i.e. town centers, employment, , residential density – Transportation supply-side e.g rapid transit network – Transportation demand- side e.g.
    [Show full text]