DOCSLIB.ORG

View Reducing Parking at Transit Stations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Rail~Volution Salt Lake City, Utah 8-10 September, 2005 Reducing Parking at Transit Stations Jeffrey Tumlin EVALUATING PARKING AT TRANSIT STATIONS • Effects on transit ridership – Transit Oriented Development (TOD): New households & transit trips – Parking: Park-&-Ride participants – Implications for encouraging future growth in ridership • Effects on traffic congestion – Walking, cycling & transit trips to station – Proportion and amount of vehicle trips to station – Implications in allocating of street right-of-way • Effects on revenue generation – Lease or sale of land: Land value with higher density & mixed use compared to parking – Development of land: Joint development, economic vitality – Productive use of land: Economic productivity, sales tax Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING TRANSIT PARKING • SkyTrain system in Vancouver, BC (TransLink) – Land use concentration around SkyTrain – Transportation supply – Transportation demand including low to no parking • Metrorail stations in Arlington County, VA (WMATA) – Urban village development – Multimodal transportation – Shared parking only (No park-&-ride) • South Hayward station in Northern California (BART) – Plans to develop area around station and improve pedestrian, bicycle and bus access – Determining amount of replacement parking Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting TRANSLINK SKYTRAIN SYSTEM Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Greater Vancouver Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Canada – US BorderJeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Vancouver’s Regional Planning Context • GVTA Act – Support Livable Region Strategic Plan • Transport strategy aims to increase choice through 3 “levers” – Land use i.e. town centers, employment, , residential density – Transportation supply-side e.g rapid transit network – Transportation demand- side e.g. pricing, TDM Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Land Use Strategy • Transport needs are derived from how people and activities are distributed • Concentrating population & jobs – Activity centers with transit-supportive densities – Residential densities e.g. high density residential towers around stations • Linking town centers with good transit – Rapid transit to help ‘shape’ growth – Transit investment linked to regional growth management Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Land Use Density and Transit 70.0 60.0 50.0 Europe 40.0 Asia GVRD % Transit % Use 30.0 20.0 10.0 US-Canada-Australia 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Persons/hectare 120.0 Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Employment Density and Transit Car trips per 10,000 jobs (round trips) 9,000 10,000 7,500 6,400 7,500 5,000 5,000 2,500 0 district Central business New Office park Office Metrotown Westminster Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting RegionalLand Use Density(Concentration & Activity Centers) Growth Concentration Area – 70% of Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Future Growth Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Transportation Supply (RT Development) West Coast Express 1995 City Coquitlam Centre Millennium UBC Line- 2002 Metrotown UBC Future Coquitlam Light Rail Extension 2009 Expo Line – 1986 Airport Surrey WCE from RAV – Automated Langley Richmond Rapid Transit 2008 2009 Surrey Busway 2013 Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Transportation Demand • Improving services – High speed & frequency SkyTrain services (< 5 minutes) – Improved connections to other services (e.g. B-Lines) – U-Pass program • Creating a transit culture – Encouraging use day & night – Creating advocates & supporters – Improving image/ reputation – Targeting frequent users and students/universities • Improving station areas – e.g. Broadway-Commercial TOD plan to improve livability as well as transit performance and ridership • No park-&-ride lots at transit stations Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Lessons & Results in Greater Vancouver • Increasing ridership and cost recovery –41% increase in ridership since 1994 –20% increase in ridership since 2002 –Ridership of 200 million by 2010 (33% increase) • Park-&-ride generally discouraged at stations –Allows access to transit & extends system BUT –Sterilizes land around stations –Disconnects city from system –Promotes low density urban development –Discourages all-day rides –Raises safety, personal security issues Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Transportation Demand Actual Projected 220 204M 200 180 154M 160 140 109M Strike 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2009 2000 2010 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting ARLINGTON COUNTY Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Land Use in Arlington County • Across the Potomac River from Washington, DC • High-density commercial and residential development around Metrorail Stations – Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor – Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor • Population of nearly 200,000 – 5% increase since 2000 • Employment of approximately 195,200 jobs • Density of 7,700 people / square mile – One of the most densely populated regions in the country Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Metrorail Service in Arlington County • 11 Metrorail stations within Arlington County • Approximately 200,000 people/weekday entering these stations • 61 million one-way trips/year to, from and within the county • Development planned or under construction in the county – 6,000 housing units – 3 million sq ft office – 1 million sq ft retail Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Urban Villages in Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor • 5 urban villages developed around Metro stations in the Corridor – 3 miles long and 2 square miles in area – Medium-high density mixed use villages – Surrounded by well established low-moderate density neighborhoods • Supported by multimodal transportation facilities – Walkable, pedestrian/bike-friendly environment – 5 closely spaced Metrorail Stations that are below grade – Local and feeder bus service – Extensive, connected network of highways, arterials and local streets • Close to the center of Downtown DC • No distinct park-&-ride facilities, only public shared parking Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Development Patterns, 1960s – 1970s • Loss of status as Northern Virginia’s main retail district – Declining retail sales – Declining population as families moved to the suburbs – Disinvestment in residential neighborhoods, absentee landlords, land speculation • New shopping centers emerging instead in Fairfax County • Large scale office development and increasing employment in Rosslyn Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Redevelopment Initiative • Use Metrorail transit investment as catalyst for intensive redevelopment of the commercial spine of central Arlington • Concentrate density and promote mixed use at 5 stations – Rosslyn, Courthouse, Clarendon, Virginia Square, Ballston • Taper development down to adjacent neighborhoods • Preserve and reinvest in established residential neighborhoods adjacent to the corridor Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting The Redevelopment Initiative Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Household, Population & Employment Trends 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 HH 40,000 Population 30,000 Employment 20,000 10,000 0 1972 1980 1990 2000 2003 Est. Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Commercial Office & Retail Development 22.5 20 17.5 15 Office 12.5 (M SF) 10 Retail 7.5 (M SF) 5 2.5 0 1972 1980 1990 2000 2003+UC Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Retail & Entertainment • Increase in full service supermarkets in Rosslyn- Ballston Corridor from 1 to 4 • Increase in the number of restaurants (currently over 100) • Provision of two multi- screen cinemas adjacent to Metro Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Transportation System Performance • Increasing weekday trips at the 5 stations from 57,100 (1980) to 79,500 (2002) • 73.3% of patrons travel to/from Metro stations on foot or over 58,000 trips daily* • 11.1% of patron travel to/from Metro by bus or over 8,800 trips daily* • Increasing pedestrian and cycling activity – Over 5,000 walk trips to/from work according to the 2000 Census • Elimination of dedicated station parking * WMATA May 2002 weekday Metrorail ridership and access data, WMATA historical ridership counts, Census 2000 Journey to Work Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Metrorail Access at 5 R-B Corridor Stations 39,500 daily boardings 2.0% 12.9% 1.0% Walk 3.6% Metrobus 7.5% Other Bus/Vanpool Auto (incl. Drop- off) Other No Response 73.0% Source: WMATA May 2002 weekday Metrorail ridership and access data Reduced Transit Parking at Rail Stations Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson\Nygaard
Recommended publications
  • ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7

    ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7

    Services Transit Outreach Materials Distribution Light Rail Station Maintenance and Inspection Photography—Capture Metadata and GPS Marketing Follow-Up Programs Service Locations Dallas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis/Saint Paul San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area Our Customer Service Pledge Our pledge is to organize and act with precision to provide you with excellent customer service. We will do all this with all the joy that comes with the morning sun! “I slept and dreamed that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy. “Tagore Email: [email protected] Website: URBANMARKETINGCHANNELS.COM Urban Marketing Channel’s services to businesses and organizations in Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco, Oakland and the Twin Cities metro areas since 1981 have allowed us to develop a specialty client base providing marketing outreach with a focus on transit systems. Some examples of our services include: • Neighborhood demographic analysis • Tailored response and mailing lists • Community event monitoring • Transit site management of information display cases and kiosks • Transit center rider alerts • Community notification of construction and route changes • On-Site Surveys • Enhance photo and list data with geocoding • Photographic services Visit our website (www.urbanmarketingchannels.com) Contact us at [email protected] 612-239-5391 Bay Area Transit Sites (includes BART and AC Transit.) Prepared by Urban Marketing Channels ACT BART S ites by Region.csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7 UnSANtit
  • SBC Executivesummfac

    SBC Executivesummfac

    CAPITOL CORRIDOR SOUTH BAY CONNECT AUGUST 2020 Purpose Study Area and Project Elements South Bay Connect proposes to relocate the Capitol Corridor passenger rail service between the Oakland N Coliseum and Newark from the Union Pacific Railroad (UP) Niles Subdivision to the Coast Subdivision for a faster, more direct route. It will also create new transbay connections for passengers between the East Bay and Peninsula by connecting to bus and shuttle services at the Ardenwood Station. The project is not proposing an increase in Capitol Corridor service frequency or changes to UP’s freight service, but does not preclude service growth in the future. The relocation will facilitate the separation of passenger and freight rail, resulting in improved rail operations, efficiency, and reliability while minimizing rail congestion within the corridor. Proposed New Station and Railroad Potential Station Area Proposed Capitol Corridor (CC) Service Potential Station Considered and Eliminated Existing CC Service Existing Station CC Service to be Discontinued Station where CC Service Study Area to be Discontinued UP Improvement Area BART Station Benefits Reduce passenger rail travel time between Oakland and San Jose and throughout the larger megaregion to increase ridership on transit, ease congestion on the Bay Area’s stressed roadways, and decrease auto commutes. Diversify and enhance network integration by reducing duplicative capital investments and dif- ferentiating Capitol Corridor’s intercity rail service from commuter rail and other transit services, including BART’s extension to San Jose. Support economic vitality by permitting enhanced rail movement and the preservation of freight rail capacity in the Northern California market through the reduction of existing conflicts between freight rail operations and passenger rail service.
  • Mcconaghy House Teacher Packet Contains Historical Information About the Mcconaghy Family, Surrounding Region, and American Lifestyle

    Mcconaghy House Teacher Packet Contains Historical Information About the Mcconaghy Family, Surrounding Region, and American Lifestyle

    1 WELCOME TO THE McCONAGHY HOUSE! Visiting the McConaghy House is an exciting field trip for students and teachers alike. Docent-led school tours of the house focus on local history, continuity and change, and the impact of individuals in our community. The house allows students to step into the past and experience and wonder about the life of a farming family. The McConaghy House is also an example of civic engagement as the community mobilized in the 1970’s to save the house from pending demolition. Through the efforts of concerned citizens, an important part of our local history has been pre- served for future generations to enjoy. The McConaghy House Teacher Packet contains historical information about the McConaghy family, surrounding region, and American lifestyle. Included are pre and post visit lesson plans, together with all necessary resources and background information. These lessons are not required for a guided visit but will greatly enrich the experience for students. The lessons can be completed in any order, though recommendations have been made for ease of implementation. We welcome comments and suggestions about the usefulness of this packet in your classroom. An evaluation form is enclosed for your feedback. Thank you for booking a field trip to the McConaghy House. We look forward to seeing you and your students! Sincerely, Education Department 22380 Foothill Blvd Hayward, CA 94541 510-581-0223 www.haywardareahistory.org 2 Table of Contents Teacher Information The Hayward Area Historical Society .................................................................................... 4 Why do we study history? How does a museum work? ....................................................... 5 History of the McConaghy Family for Teachers ...................................................................
  • Hayward Transit Routes Map (PDF)

    Hayward Transit Routes Map (PDF)

    Verdese Carter Rec. Ctr. Snow Bldg. Elmhurst NX3 98 Comm. Prep Hellman Transit Park ELMHURST Holly Elmhurst- 40 NXC Mini- Lyons Field 75 Dunsmuir Information Elmhurst INTERNATIONALPark BLVD 57 Foothill Plaza Square 45 East Bay House & 1 0 6 T H A V M V Gardens Lake Chabot A A Reg’l Parks 9 8 T H A V 45 C H Municipal A 08T BANCROFT AV R 1 Hq Golf Course 98 T H UR Hayward 45 1 0 4 T H A V B NX4 Dunsmuir Ridge LV D 75 Open Space Clubhouse NXC 0 0.5mi Station Durant Stonehurst D Square L V V A D M B Victoria A Park O O O R REVE R E EDE 1 0 5 T H A V B R Park S A Roosevelt V 45 Plgd. Farrelly NX3 0 0.5km Hayward SAN LEANDRO BLVD 1 75 Shefeld 45 Pool Rec. Ctr. San Leandro BART N McCartney 75 Milford Park Park SHEFFIELD Tyrone D U T T O N A V 1 10 75 85 89 Carney 75 Onset A 40 VILLAGE Map Key Park C Park A Chabot L R A E E 1 4 T H S T Park Shuttles NL SL N N D E You Are Here S Vets. W D Siempre R O 75 Mem. G Verde Park O R BART D Bldg. A D 45 City N Willow Park BART Memorial R R CAPISTRANO DR D Hall Bancroft T D L A O Public R Park B C A L L A N A V A K D Root Library Mid.
  • 2015 Station Profiles

    2015 Station Profiles

    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
  • BART Hayward Station Closure Monday, February 6Th, 2017

    BART Hayward Station Closure Monday, February 6Th, 2017

    BART Hayward Station Closure Monday, February 6th, 2017 5:04 PM There is a station closure and trains are holding out at Hayward station due to police activity. -- 6:00 PM There is a 10-minute delay between 24th St. Mission and Balboa Park on the Daly City Line in the SFO, Millbrae and East Bay directions due to an equipment problem on the track. There is a station closure and trains are holding out at Hayward station due to police activity. There is a major delay at Hayward on the Fremont Line in the Fremont, Richmond and Daly City directions due to police activity. Parallel service is available via AC Transit. Bus #10 between Hayward and Bayfair. Bus#99 from Hayward to South Hayward and beyond. -- 6:30 PM There is a 10-minute delay between 24th St. Mission and Balboa Park on the Daly City Line in the SFO, Millbrae and East Bay directions due to an equipment problem on the track. This advisory is sent in the event anyone is still in their office monitoring BART progress tonight. There is a station closure and trains are holding out at Hayward station due to police activity. There is a major delay at Hayward on the Fremont Line in the Fremont, Richmond and Daly City directions due to police activity. Parallel service is available via AC Transit. Bus #10 between Hayward and Bayfair. Bus#99 from Hayward to South Hayward and beyond. There is a major delay on the Richmond Line in the Fremont direction due to police activity.
  • Minutes of the Joint Planning Commission

    Minutes of the Joint Planning Commission

    Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Strategy Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting 8 Meeting Notes November 14, 2006 6:37 p.m. – CALL TO ORDER Attendance CAC Members Present: Alcantar, Brannan, Chi, Collier, Cuellas, Finberg, Free, Helmbrecht, Hopkinson, Houston, Kaplan, Markham, Mobley-Maundu, Raposo, Stensgard, Talley, Tannam, Trujillo, Ward CAC Members Absent: Flynn, Kleebauer, Sidari, Sykes, Storer Staff: Hanson Hom, Community Development Director, Kathleen Livermore, Senior Planner and TOD Project Manager Other: Michael Smiley, BMS Design Group, Tim Hurley, BMS Design Group, Jim Daisa, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Item 1: Welcome Anna Brannan, CAC Chair, opened the meeting and asked that both CAC members and members of the public sign in. Mayor Elect Tony Santos welcomed the Committee members and noted he recognized quite a few folks. He extended his personal appreciation for the work of the CAC. Mayor Elect Santos stated that the downtown is the heart of the community and this plan is vitally important for San Leandro and the future. This plan can help provide the essential critical mass and be a catalyst for development in the downtown. Mayor Elect Santos stressed the importance of evaluating noise impacts of any proposed development in the study area as he had heard from many residents in noise impacted areas during his campaign. He also stressed the importance of providing parks and open space in the downtown. Mayor Elect Santos noted that people will have to learn how to get out of their cars to make a successful pedestrian friendly oriented downtown. He again expressed his appreciation for the commitment of time.
  • EMMA Official Statement

    EMMA Official Statement

    NEW ISSUE – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s (2020 Bonds): Aaa Long Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-1 Bonds): AAA Short Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-2 Bonds): A-1+ See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the District, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. Bond Counsel further observes that interest on the 2020C-2 Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the 2020 Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS.” $700,000,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $625,005,000 $74,995,000 (ELECTION OF 2016), (ELECTION OF 2016), 2020 SERIES C-1 2020 SERIES C-2 (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) (GREEN BONDS) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on inside cover The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2016), 2020 Series C-1 (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-1 Bonds”) and 2020 Series C-2 (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-2 Bonds” and, together with the 2020C-1 Bonds, the “2020 Bonds”) are being issued to finance specific acquisition, construction and improvement projects for District facilities approved by the voters and to pay the costs of issuance of the 2020 Bonds.
  • Transportation Demand Management Plan

    Transportation Demand Management Plan

    SoHay Mixed Use Development Project Transportation Demand Management Plan Hayward, California February 28, 2018 SoHay Mixed Used Development Table of Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................1 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................1 Parking ...................................................................................................................................................2 Report Organization .............................................................................................................................3 Existing Transportation Facilities and Services ..................................................................................6 Transit Facilities .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 BART ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Bus Routes .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Bicycle Facilities ...................................................................................................................................................................

  • It's a Crisp Morning at the Coyote Creek Field Station of the San

    Blues, rock Four-legged Chanticleers and soul weed-whackers presents music provide ‘Dial M for headliners essential Murder’ come to services town Page 12 Page 19 Page 25 Scan for our FREE App or Search App Store for TCVnews 510-494-1999 [email protected] www.tricityvoice.com January 30, 2018 Vol. 16 No. 5 ARTICLE AND PHOTOS BY MARGARET THORNBERRY It’s a crisp morning at the Coyote Creek Field Station of the San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory (SFBBO), and the staff is bundled up and ready to move out to put up mist nets. The nets are a fine mesh, nearly invisible, but flexible and fine enough so that when a bird flies into them, it is held safely, ready to be carefully removed by hand, placed into a small cloth bag to calm it, and tucked under a jacket or shirt to keep warm for the walk back to the station office. There it is weighed, measured, evaluated for health and either banded, or if already banded, logged, and then carefully released. Continued on page 17 Banded Snowy Plover Photo by Ben Pearl signature outdoor activity program, its Trails Challenge. Launched in 1993 to get East Bay residents moving outdoors and exploring their trails, the program makes it easy for hikers of all abilities to get to know and love their Regional Parks. Trails Challenge is a free program supported through financial contributions from the East Bay Regional Park District, Kaiser Permanente, and SUBMITTED BY DAVE MASON the Regional Parks Foundation. PHOTOS COURTESY EBPRD “The 2017 Trails Challenge was great,” said Hayward resident and 2017 participant This year marks the 25th anniversary of the Diane Petersen.
  • Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts

    Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts

    ffional Development BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with research assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich July 1995 University of California at Berkeley - 1 BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with Research Assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich This paper was produced with support provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through the University of California Transportation Center. University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development Table of Contents ONE: BART at 20: An Analysis of Land Use Impacts 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TWO: Research Approach and Data Sources 3 THREE: Employment and Population Changes in BART and Non-BART Areas 6 3.1. Population Changes 6 3.2. Employment Changes 3.3. Population Densities 15 3.4. Employment Densities 15 3.5. Summary 20 FOUR: Land Use Changes Over Time and by Corridor 21 4.1. General Land-Use Trends 23 4.2. Pre-BART versus Post-BART 25 4.3. Early versus Later BART 30 4.4. Trends in Non-Residential Densities 33 4.4. Summary 37 FIVE: Land-Use Changes by Station Classes 38 5.1. Grouping Variables 38 5.2. Classification 38 5.3. Station Classes 41 5.4. Trends in Residential and Non-Residential Growth Among Station Classes 44 5.5. Percent Growth in Early- versus Later-BART Years Among Station Classes 46 5.6. Trends in Non-Residential Densities Among Station Classes 46 SLX: Matched-Pair Comparisons of Land-Use Changes near BART Stations Versus Freeway Interchanges 51 6.1.
  • 18-311 ,:/1 Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 Alameda-Contracosta Transit District

    18-311 ,:/1 Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 Alameda-Contracosta Transit District

    ReportNo: 18-311 ,:/1 Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 Alameda-ContraCosta Transit District STAFF RE PO RT TO: ACTransit Board of Directors FROM: Michael A. Hursh, General Manager SUBJECT: Operator Restroomsat BARTStations ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) Consider authorizing the GeneraIManager to negotiate and execute an agreement with the Bay Area RapidTransit District (BART)for the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of Operator restrooms. BUDGETARY/FISCAL IMPACT This project will be added to the current fiscal year Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planwith $638,826 in District Capital funds. Capital Planning and Grants will continue to seek externalfunding to support this project. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE AC Transit provides fixed route serviceto and from many Bay Area RapidTransit District IBART) stations located in the East Bay.AC Transit Operators and Road Supervisors rely on the ability to utilize BART station restroom facilities during a scheduled break. On several occasions, employees were not able to use the public restrooms because of long lines or the restroom being closed for repairs. At the April 4, 2018 BART/AC Transit Interagency Liaison Committee jtLC) both agencies agreed to collaborate on developing a process to provide restroom access for AC Transit personnelat BARTstations. Station Restroom Assessment Staff conducted an assessmentof fourteen BART stations where AC Transit buses have scheduled layovers and are utilized by District employees for restroom breaks during the peak period between 3:00pm and 9:00pm. Listed on the table below are the BARTstations with the highest amount of buses scheduled for layover during the evening: 1 of 23 Report No. 18-311 Page2 of4 BARTStation LayoversPerPeak Period Fruitvale fremont Bay Fair West Oakland Coliseum EI Cerrito Plaza SanLeandro The following BARTstations were determined to be least utilized with lessthan 25 scheduled busesthat layover: DeINorte, South Hayward, Castro Valley, Richmond and North Berkeley.