DOCSLIB.ORG

NNN Leased Strip Center, Value-Add Potential

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NNN Leased Strip Center, Value-Add Potential NNN Leased Strip Center, Value-Add Potential 3105 Railroad Ave Mary Alam, MBA Joshua Ballesteros Pittsburg, CA 94565 Senior Vice President Investment Advisor O: 415.358.2111 O: 415.480.0214 M: 415.297.5586 M: 209.518.9025 [email protected] [email protected] CalDRE #01927340 CalDRE #02010271 OFFERING MEMORANDUM Table Of Contents Table of Contents 3 Section 1 Property Information 6 Section 2 Location Information 14 Section 3 Financial Analysis 18 Section 4 Sale Comparables 25 Section 5 Rent Comparables 34 Section 6 Demographics Section 1 THE OFFERING 1 Property Description Property Overview NAI Northern California is pleased to present for sale this well located strip center with 10 retail units and NNN leases. The property benefits from its strategic location in an emerging retail corridor just 0.7 miles from the Pittsburg Bart station and the California Delta Highway-4. Railroad Avenue enjoys close to a 20,000 vehicles per day traffic count which further adds to the visibility of this retail property and its success. This busy retail corridor includes, among others, the Atlantic Plaza Shopping Center, which features a wide variety of vendors such as FoodsCo, CVS, Goodwill, McDonald's, USPS, Little Caesar's, Mountain Mike's, Jackson Hewitt Tax and more Location Overview The subject is located on busy Railroad Avenue in Pittsburg, minutes from the Pittsburg Bart Station and busy Highway 4. It enjoys strong demographics of approximately 150,000 people within a five mile radius with an average household income of approximately $82,000 per year. Population growth within five miles has been phenomenal at nearly 12% between 2010 and 2018 and projected to be close to 6% in the next five years. The property is surrounded by residential, retail, medical offices and various ethnic grocers and restaurants that serve a diverse and growing community. nainorcal.com 4 Executive Summary SALE PRICE: $1,590,000 Property Highlights BUILDING SIZE: 8,758 SF • Potential for added value due to below-market rents. LOT SIZE: 0.50 AC • Strategically located on Railroad Avenue with approximately 20,000 cars per day. 919 2018 NOI: $100, • Emerging retail corridor 0.7 miles from Hwy 4 & Pittsburg Center BART station on Railroad Ave. 2018 CAP RATE: 6.35% • Excellent demographics with population size more than 152,456 within a 5-mile radius FULLY LEASED 7.20% CAP RATE: • Major retail nearby includes FoodsCo, Goodwill, Walgreens, CVS, La Superior Mercados, Dollar OCCUPANCY RATE: 88% Tree, Starbucks, Subway, McDonald's etc. PRICE/SF: $182 • Pittsburgh is projected to be the fastest growing city in Contra Costa County by 2020. YEAR BUILT: 1970 APN: 088-064-026-3 nainorcal.com 5 Section 2 LOCATION 2 INFORMATION Location Overview Location Overview SanSan FrancisFranciscoco BayBay Area,Area, CA CA The San Francisco Bay Area, Thecommonly San Francisco referred to asBay the Area, Bay commonlyArea, is a populatedreferred to regionas the thatBay Area,surrounds is a populatedthe San regionFrancisco that surroundsand San thePablo San estuaries Francisco in andNorthern San California.Pablo estuaries The region in Northern California. The region encompasses the major cities encompasses the major cities and metropolitan areas of San and metropolitan areas of San Francisco,Francisco, Oakland,Oakland, and SanSan Jose,Jose, alongalong with smallersmaller urbanurban andand ruralrural areas.areas. The BayBay Area’sArea’s ninenine countiescounties are Alameda,Alameda, ContraContra Costa,Costa, Marin, Napa, SanSan Francisco,Francisco, SanSan Mateo, SantaSanta Clara,Clara, Solano,Solano, and Sonoma.Sonoma. Home to approximately 7.44 Home to approximately 7.44 million people, the nine-county million people, the nine-county Bay Area contains many cities, towns,Bay Area airports, contains and many associated cities, regional,towns, airports, state, andand associated national parks,regional, connected state, andby a nationalnetwork Pittsburgh, CA ofparks, roads, connected highways, by a railroads,network The city of Pittsburg is located in Contra Costa County, California with a population size of 70,679. Located on the bridges,of roads, tunnels highways, and commuterrailroads, Richmond,southern shore of the Suisun CA Bay in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area, the city is 37 miles northeast rail.bridges, The combined tunnels and urban commuter area of of San Francisco, 29 miles northeast of Oakland, California, 60 miles north to San Jose and 65 miles south to therail. region The combined is the second-largest urban area of RichmondSacramento, is California.in western Pittsburg Contra Costashares County,a border California,with Antioch United to the States. east, Bay The Point city to was the incorporatedwest, and Concord on August to the in California (after the Greater southwest. The Suisun Bay is directly north of the city and connects the San Francisco Bay to the Sacramento and the region is the second-largest 7, 1905. Located in the eastern region of the San Francisco Bay Area, Richmond’s 33.7 square miles Los Angeles area), the fifthlargest San Joaquin rivers. There are two BART stations in Pittsburg - the Pittsburg/Bay Point Station located on Bailey Road in California (after the Greater borders the cities of San Pablo, Albany, El Cerrito and Pinole in addition to the unincorporated communities in the United States, and ofand North Highway Richmond, 4 and the Hasford Pittsburg Heights, Center Station Kensington, located Elon Sobrante, Railroad Avenue Bayview-Mountalvin and Highway 4. TriManor, Delta TaraTransit Hills, provides and Los Angeles area), the fifth- bus service in the area. California State Route 4 bisects the city from west to east. The economy of Pittsburg, CA is the 43rd-largest urban area in East Richmond Heights, and briefly San Francisco on Red Rock Island. thelargest world. in the United States, and specialized in Admin, Support, Waste Management Services; Construction; and Healthcare & Social Assistance. The the 43rd-largest urban area in total population employed in the economy is 30,460. The largest industries are Healthcare & Social Assistance(5,645), UnderRetail trade the McLaughlin(3,306), and Administration,Construction (2,934), Richmond and the was highest the largestpaying industriescity in the include United Utilities States ($63,333), served by a Green the world. PartyManagement mayor. of As Companies of the 2013 & Enterprises($62,750), U.S. Census, the city’s and populationProfessional, is Scientific, at 107,571. Tech Services($57,692). 4 Aerial Map nainorcal.com 8 Retailer Map nainorcal.com 9 Current Projects nainorcal.com 11 Employers Map nainorcal.com 10 Plot Map nainorcal.com 12 Additional Photos nainorcal.com 13 Section 3 FINANCIAL 3 ANALYSIS Rent Roll Fully Fully Fully Fully Monthly NNN Total Annual Leased Fully Leased Leased Leased Approx. Rent (CAM) Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Lease Lease Rent Monthly/ Leased Monthly Annual/ Annual Unit # Tenant SF % SF 2018 Month Payment Rent 2018 Rent/SF Rent/SF Start Exp. Options Increase SF Monthly Total SF Rent A E-Vapor * 1,000 12% $1,650 $200 $1,850 $19,800 $1.65 $19.80 2013 2019 1x5 CPI $1.65 $1,650 $1,850 $19.80 $19,800 A-1 Dos Market 1,000 12% $1,400 $200 $1,600 $16,800 $1.40 $16.80 2006 2023 1X5 CPI $1.40 $1,400 $1,600 $16.80 $16,800 B Body Art 540 6% $648 $119 $767 $7,776 $1.20 $14.40 2018 2021 CPI $1.20 $648 $767 $14.40 $7,776 C Barber 400 5% $480 $80 $560 $5,760 $1.20 $14.40 1991 2022 CPI $1.20 $480 $560 $14.40 $5,760 D1 Insurance 409 5% $552 $112 $664 $6,624 $1.35 $16.20 1994 2020 CPI $1.35 $552 $664 $16.20 $6,624 D Spa Salon 800 9% $960 $176 $1,136 $11,520 $1.20 $14.40 2018 2021 CPI $1.20 $960 $1,136 $14.40 $11,520 E Vacant 1,000 12% $0 $1.20 $1,200 $1,420 $14.40 $14,400 Accounting F 1,280 15% $1,560 $230 $1,790 $18,720 $1.22 $14.63 2003 2020 CPI $1.22 $1,560 $1,790 $14.63 $18,720 Office G Hair Salon 1,000 12% $1,200 $200 $1,400 $14,400 $1.20 $14.40 2017 2019 CPI $1.20 $1,200 $1,400 $14.40 $14,400 H Herbal 1,000 12% $1,200 $200 $1,400 $14,400 $1.20 $14.40 2013 2020 CPI $1.20 $1,200 $1,400 $14.40 $14,400 Totals 8,429 88% $9,650 $1,517 $11,167 $115,800 $1.14 $13.74 $1.29 $10,850 $12,587 $15.45 $130,200 nainorcal.com 15 Financial Summary Debt and Return Calculations Loan Quote (subject to change) Sale Price $1,590,000 Loan Amount $954,000 Loan To Value 60% Down payment $636,000 Interest Rate 4.80% Amortization 30 Return Calculations Net Operating Income: $100,919 Debt Service: $5,068 $60,064 Pre-Tax Cash Flow: (Cash on Cash return) 6.4% $40,855 Principal Reduction: 14,272 Total Return: 8.7% $55,127 Principal Interest $14,272 $45,792 Year 1 nainorcal.com 16 Financial Summary Income And Expenses 2018 ACTUAL 2019 Proforma Rental Income $115,800 $130,200 NNN Income $18,204 $20,844 Total Gross Income $134,004 $151,044 Expense Breakdown Cleaning & Maintenance $6,633 $6,633 MGMT $3,600 $3,600 Utilities $1,840 $1,840 Tax $24,555 $24,555 Insurance $3,090 $3,090 Total Expenses $33,085 $33,085 NOI $100,919 $117,959 Valuation Analysis 2018 2019 Net Income $100,919 $117,959 Vacancy Rate (3%) $3,539 NOI $100,919 $114,420 PRICE $1,590,000 $1,590,000 nainorcal.com 17 Section 4 SALE 4 COMPARABLES Sales Comparables Subject Property 3105 Railroad Ave.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BART 2016 Factsheet
    BART 2016 Factsheet Connecting People to Opportunity BART by the Numbers For over four decades, BART has been an efficient, reliable way for families, friends, and commuters to • BART estimates ridership in FY16 safely reach their destinations. What started out as a futuristic dream in 1972 — then carrying only will average 430,000 trips on 100,000 passengers per week— has now grown to be a vital part of the regional culture and economy. weekdays and 129 million trips annually. However, as the Bay Area’s population swells, BART faces the challenge of upgrading and updating its • During peak commute hours, over nearly half century old infrastructure to meet the needs of a modern transit system. BART’s highly skilled 60,000 people ride through the and dedicated workforce is putting enormous effort into developing a plan for the future, and we are Transbay Tube in each direction. excited to work together toward a new era for BART transit. • BART’s Pittsburg/Bay Point (yellow) line carries the largest AMTRAK SAN JOAQUIN number of people. Pittsburg Center Station Antioch Station Richmond Pittsburg/Bay Point El Cerrito del Norte • Embarcadero and Montgomery North Concord/Martinez El Cerrito Plaza stations are the busiest in the Concord North Berkeley Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre BART system. In FY15, over Downtown Berkeley Walnut Creek 170,000 trips were made to or Ashby Lafayette from these stations each weekday. Orinda Rockridge MacArthur TIMED TRANSFER (SOUTHBOUND) • Our top ridership day last year West Oakland 19th St/Oakland TIMED TRANSFER (NORTHBOUND) 12th St/Oakland City Center was June 19, 2015 for the SAN FRANCISCO Embarcadero Lake Merritt EAST BAY Warriors Championship Parade Montgomery St Fruitvale Powell St and A’s game —548,076 trips! Coliseum TRANSFER FOR SERVICE TO OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Civic Center/UN Plaza MUNI METRO San Leandro • BART directly serves SFO and Bay Fair 16th St Mission Castro Valley Dublin/Pleasanton OAK, the nation’s 7th and 35th 24th St Mission Glen Park Oakland busiest airports.
    [Show full text]
  • EMMA Official Statement
    NEW ISSUE – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s (2020 Bonds): Aaa Long Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-1 Bonds): AAA Short Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-2 Bonds): A-1+ See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the District, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. Bond Counsel further observes that interest on the 2020C-2 Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the 2020 Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS.” $700,000,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $625,005,000 $74,995,000 (ELECTION OF 2016), (ELECTION OF 2016), 2020 SERIES C-1 2020 SERIES C-2 (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) (GREEN BONDS) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on inside cover The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2016), 2020 Series C-1 (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-1 Bonds”) and 2020 Series C-2 (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-2 Bonds” and, together with the 2020C-1 Bonds, the “2020 Bonds”) are being issued to finance specific acquisition, construction and improvement projects for District facilities approved by the voters and to pay the costs of issuance of the 2020 Bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Bart Better Bay Area Better Bart / Better Bay Area
    BETTER BART BETTER BAY AREA BETTER BART / BETTER BAY AREA 2 2 BART SYSTEM—THEN AND NOW “The decision of the people to build a 3-county Bay Area rapid transit system is one of the most courageous and promising acts in modern American municipal history…” —San Francisco Examiner, November 9, 1962 Pittsburg Center Station Antioch Station 1974 Today 3 3 MAKING A BETTER BAY AREA 4 4 BAY BRIDGE RUSH HOUR TRAFFIC *One “person” = 500 people. 2014 Caltrans and BART peak direction totals for peak hour, based on an average of non-holiday Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. Assumes 71% of vehicles use SOV lanes with average occupancy of 1.15 persons/car, and 29% of vehicles use HOV lanes with average occupancy of 2.65 persons/car, based on 2014 Bay Area Toll Authority data and 2012 Caltrans Bay Area Managed Lanes report. 55 5 MANAGEMENT & STEWARDSHIP Reliability is Improving Revenue Accountability is High Mean Time Between Service BART has historically had one of Disruption—Vehicle Caused the highest farebox ratios of all U.S. heavy rail 4,000 100% 3,000 80% 60% 2,000 40% 1,000 20% FAREBOX RATIO RECOVERY FAREBOX 0 0% HOURS BETWEEN DISRUPTION BETWEEN SERVICE HOURS BART WMATA NYCT Caltrain CTA MARTA Muni *National Transit Database (NTD) data, the source of these figures, excludes certain operating expenses, such as building leases, legal settlements, and Other Post Employment Benefits. 6 6 BUILDING A BETTER BART 7 7 LABOR RELATIONS 8 8 BART TO OAK AIRPORT • 3.2-mile extension from Coliseum Station to the Oakland International Airport • Automated, driverless
    [Show full text]
  • BART FY19 Short Range Transit Plan/Capital Improvement Program
    BUILDING A BETTER BART BUILDING A BETTER BART FY19 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OCTOBER 2018 San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Robert Raburn, President, Board of Directors Grace Crunican, General Manager Short Range Transit Plan and Capital Improvement Program Federal transportation statutes require that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), in partnership with state and local agencies, develop and periodically update a long-range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) that implements the RTP by programming federal funds to transportation projects contained in the RTP. To effectively execute these planning and programming responsibilities, MTC requires that each transit operator in its region that receives federal funding through the TIP prepare, adopt, and submit to MTC a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) that includes a Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Schedule, cost, and performance data used to generate this SRTP/CIP were based upon the most current information available as of October 2018. July 2018 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1 2 Overview of the BART System ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 History ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Governance ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TRI Del1i4 TRANSIT Eastt';)Rn Contra Costa Trms!T Autflority 801 Wiibur Avenue• Antioch, California 94509 Phone
    TRI DEL1i4 TRANSIT Eastt';)rn Contra Costa TrMs!t Autflority 801 Wiibur Avenue• Antioch, California 94509 Phone. 92S;7S4.6622. Fax 92.5.757.253() Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Wednesday October 31'\ 2018 4:00pm ECCTA Boardroom 801 Wilbur Avenue, Antioch, CA 94509 Available online: www.trideltatransit.com . Please see the last page of this agenda for: • Public comment guidelines • Agenda, staff report, and document availability • Americans with Disabilities Act information • Anticipated action by the Board of Directors 1. Call to Order: Chair Diane Burgis a. Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance rr=~~~~~~==~~~~~===;i Board of Directors: While public comments are encouraged and taken very seriously, State law City of Antioch prevents the Board of Directors from discussing items that are not on the 3. Public Comment meeting agenda. If appropriate, staff will follow up on public comments, Lamar Thorpe Please see Public Comment Guidelines on Page 3 of this agenda. Monica Wilson City of Brentwood 4. Chair's Report: Chair Diane Burgis Barbara Guise RobertTaylor•• 5. Consent Calendar (ACTION ITEM): Minutes, Financial Report, and City of Oakley Doug Ha rd castle Marketing Activities Report (see attachment: tab # 1) Kevin Romick a. Minutes of the Board of Directors meeting of August 22"ct, 2018 b. Financial Report City of Pittsburg c. Marketing Activities Report Merl Craft Pete Longmire Requested Action: Approve items Sa, Sb, and Sc Contra Costa County Diane Burgis* 6. CEO's Report: Jeanne Krieg Federal Glover a. Operations Report (see attachment: tab #2) Member-at-Large b. First Transit Ken Gray * Chair: FY 2018-19 ** Vice-chair: FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 3 Board of Directors Meeting Agenda 51 Wednesday October 31 , 2018 7.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA TRANSIT DISTRICT ACCESSIBILITY TASK FORCE Draft Minutes April 23, 2015
    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA TRANSIT DISTRICT ACCESSIBILITY TASK FORCE Draft Minutes April 23, 2015 1. Self-Introductions of Members, Staff and Guests Members present: Janet Abelson, Janice Armigo Brown, Peter Crockwell, Don Queen, Hale Zukas, Clarence Fischer, Gerry Newell, Herb Hastings, Alan Smith, Larry Bunn, Brandon Young, Roland Wong, Linda Drattell Absent: Randall Glock, Marina Villena, Megan O’Brien, BART Staff present: Ike Nnaji, Bob Franklin Directors, Speaker(s), Guest Staff, and Guests of the Public: Director Robert Raburn, Sadie Graham (BART), Khawaja Zubair (BART), Balvir Thind (BART), Mac Gines (BART), David Vasquez (BART), Elena Vanloo (BART), Russell Bloom (OIPA), Farrah Nolan (ASL Interpreter), Esperanza Diaz-Alvarez, Yu Dian He, Jerry Grace, Christian Johnson (ASL Interpreter), Janice Dispo (Stenographer) 2. Public Comments [No public comments.] 3. Approval of Minutes of March 26, 2015 Meeting No opposition to Herb Hastings’ motion to approve the March 26, 2015 meeting minutes, with a second by Roland Wong. Motion passes with one abstention from Clarence Fischer. 4. Concord Station Upgrade After the presentation given by Sadie Graham, members were allowed to ask questions and/or share any concerns they had. Some of the concerns to be followed up on: - whether additional surveillance cameras will be installed, especially in parking lots and along path of travel - whether concrete benches will remain; if so, they need some contrast - shallow curb cut on the sidewalk in front of garage 5. MacArthur Station Asbestos Removal Project After the presentation given by Bob Franklin, members were allowed to ask questions and/or share any concerns they had. 6. Police Auditor Braille Brochure After the presentation by Russell Bloom, he mentioned that the creation of the Braille brochures was inspired by the BATF and its members.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS REPORTS April – June 2018
    QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS REPORTS April – June 2018 Quarterly Project Status Report Apr - Jun 2018 ON-GOING PROJECTS A. PROJECTS MANAGED BY AUTHORITY 1106S2 I-680 Auxiliary Lanes – Segment 2 ....................................................................................................................... 1 5002 State Route 4: Mokelumne Bike Trail/Pedestrian Crossing ........................................................................... 3 5005 State Route 4: Balfour Road Interchange – Phase 1 ....................................................................................... 5 6001 Interstate 680/State Route 4 Interchange Improvements: State Route 4 Widening – Phase 3 .............. 7 6002/6004 State Route 242/Clayton Road Ramps .................................................................................................................. 9 6006 State Route 4 Operational Improvements: Interstate 680 to Bailey Road ................................................. 11 7002 Interstate 80/San Pablo Dam Road Interchange Improvements .................................................................. 13 7003 Interstate 80/Central Avenue Interchange Improvements ............................................................................. 15 8001 Interstate 680 Carpool Lane Completion/Express Lanes ................................................................................. 17 8009 Innovate 680 .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EMMA Official Statement
    NEW ISSUE – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s: Aaa Standard & Poor’s: AAA See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the District, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2019 Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. Bond Counsel further observes that interest on the Taxable Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the 2019 Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS” $643,500,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $313,205,000 $205,100,000 (ELECTION OF 2016), (ELECTION OF 2004), 2019 SERIES B-1 2019 SERIES F-1 (GREEN BONDS) (GREEN BONDS) $46,795,000 $34,900,000 (ELECTION OF 2016), (ELECTION OF 2004), 2019 SERIES B-2 (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) 2019 SERIES F-2 (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) (GREEN BONDS) $43,500,000 (ELECTION
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA TRANSIT DISTRICT ACCESSIBILITY TASK FORCE Minutes March 26, 2015
    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA TRANSIT DISTRICT ACCESSIBILITY TASK FORCE Minutes March 26, 2015 1. Self-Introductions of Members, Staff and Guests Members present: Janet Abelson, Randall Glock, Janice Armigo Brown, Peter Crockwell, Don Queen, Hale Zukas, Gerry Newell, Herb Hastings, Alan Smith, Larry Bunn, Brandon Young, Roland Wong Absent: Clarence Fischer, Marina Villena, Megan O’Brien, BART Staff present: Ike Nnaji, Bob Franklin Directors, Speaker(s), Guest Staff, and Guests of the Public: Director Robert Raburn, Aaron Weinstein (BART), Carl Orman (BART), Steve Beroldo (BART), Linda Drattell, Jerry Grace, Anne Smith (ASL Interpreter), Carol Day (ASL Interpreter), Janice Dispo (Stenographer), Rebecca Tovar (Stenographer Student) 2. Public Comments [No public comments.] 3. Approval of Minutes of February 26, 2015 Meeting No opposition to Randall Glock’s motion to approve the February 26, 2015 meeting minutes, with a second by Peter Crockwell. Motion passes unanimously. 4. DSS/FOF (Destination Sign Systems/Fleet of the Future) Updates After the presentation given by Aaron Weinstein, members were allowed to ask questions and/or share any concerns they had. Janet Abelson asked how often an elevator outage notification would show on the DSS and suggested that it should appear more frequently. She added that this kind of notification should be announced on the train as well. Hale Zukas wondered whether that can be something announced by the train operator, since this is an issue that occurs rather infrequently. Ike Nnaji mentioned that he has sometimes observed BART Central Dispatch making announcements through the train. 5. Bikes on BART Survey Findings After the presentation given by Steve Beroldo, members were allowed to ask questions and/or share any concerns they had.
    [Show full text]
  • Update of the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program
    2019 Update of the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program Final Report - Adopted December 18, 2019 2019 Contra Costa Congestion Management Program The preparation of this report has been financed through a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Content of this report does not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Final 2019 Congestion Management Program – Adopted December 18, 2019 2019 Congestion Management Program for Contra Costa Executive Summary As the designated Congestion Management Agency (CMA) representing the juris- dictions of Contra Costa County, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (the Authority) is responsible for preparing and adopting a Congestion Management Program (CMP) and updating it every other year. The Authority adopted the county’s first CMP in October 1991. This document — the 2019 Contra Costa CMP — comprises the fourteenth biennial update. This update, which was prepared with help from and consultation with representa- tives of local, regional and State agencies, transit operators and the public, responds to changes in regional transportation planning, projects, and programs made since 2017. The 2019 CMP focuses primarily on bringing the required seven-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) up-to-date, while also responding primarily to tech- nical changes and corrections from the 2017 CMP, including: . Level-of-Service Standards – Updated to document changes in the use of LOS as a finding of significant impact in CEQA under Senate Bill 743. Final 2019 Congestion Management Program Page i 2019 Contra Costa Congestion Management Program . Performance Element – Updated service frequencies, standards, and performance measures from the five Contra Costa transit service providers have been incorporated to reflect current policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Seamless, Sustainable, Smart Reimagining Novato’S Public Transportation Network
    Seamless, Sustainable, Smart Reimagining Novato’s Public Transportation Network Anthony Nachor Urban and Regional Planning San Jose State University December 2019 Seamless, Sustainable, Smart: Reimagining Novato’s Public Transportation Network A Planning Report Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Urban and Regional Planning San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree Masters of Urban Planning Anthony Nachor 13 December 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................vii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... x 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Novato: A Primer ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. A Sprawling Community ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BART 2016 Factsheet
    BART 2016 Factsheet Connecting People to Opportunity BART by the Numbers For over four decades, BART has been an efficient, reliable way for families, friends, and commuters to • BART estimates ridership in FY16 safely reach their destinations. What started out as a futuristic dream in 1972 — then carrying approximately will average 430,000 trips on 170,000 passengers per week— has now grown to be a vital part of the regional culture and economy. weekdays and 129 million trips annually. However, as the Bay Area’s population swells, BART faces the challenge of upgrading and updating its • During peak commute hours, over nearly half century old infrastructure to meet the needs of a modern transit system. BART’s highly skilled 60,000 people ride through the and dedicated workforce is putting enormous effort into developing a plan for the future, and we are Transbay Tube in each direction. excited to work together toward a new era for BART transit. • BART’s Pittsburg/Bay Point (yellow) line carries the largest AMTRAK SAN JOAQUIN number of people. Pittsburg Center Station Antioch Station Richmond Pittsburg/Bay Point El Cerrito del Norte • Embarcadero and Montgomery North Concord/Martinez El Cerrito Plaza stations are the busiest in the Concord North Berkeley Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre BART system. In FY15, over Downtown Berkeley Walnut Creek 170,000 trips were made to or Ashby Lafayette from these stations each weekday. Orinda Rockridge MacArthur TIMED TRANSFER (SOUTHBOUND) • Our top ridership day last year West Oakland 19th St/Oakland TIMED TRANSFER (NORTHBOUND) 12th St/Oakland City Center was June 19, 2015 for the SAN FRANCISCO Embarcadero Lake Merritt EAST BAY Warriors Championship Parade Montgomery St Fruitvale Powell St and A’s game —548,076 trips! Coliseum TRANSFER FOR SERVICE TO OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Civic Center/UN Plaza MUNI METRO San Leandro • BART directly serves SFO and Bay Fair 16th St Mission Castro Valley Dublin/Pleasanton OAK, the nation’s 7th and 35th 24th St Mission Glen Park Oakland busiest airports.
    [Show full text]