DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Travel Consumer Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

U.S. Department of Transportation Air Travel Consumer Report Issued: MARCH 1998 Includes data for the following periods: Flight Delays January 1998 Mishandled Baggage January 1998 Oversales 4th Quarter 1997 January-December 1997 Consumer Complaints January 1998 Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings http://www.dot.gov/airconsumer/ TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page INTRODUCTION ......................…2 Flight Delays Explanation ......................…3 Mishandled Baggage Table 1 ......................…4 Explanation ....................…..16 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Ranking ....................…..17 Operations Arriving On Time, by Carrier Table 1A ......................…5 Oversales Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Explanation ....................…..18 Operations Arriving On Time and Carrier Rank, Ranking--Quarter ....................…..19 by Month, Quarter, and Data Base to Date Table 2 ......................…6 Ranking--YTD ....................…..20 Number of Reported Flight Arrivals and Per- centage Arriving On Time, by Carrier and Airport Consumer Complaints Table 3 ......................…8 Explanation ....................…..21 Percentage of All Carriers' Reported Flight Complaint Tables 1-5 ..............22 Operations Arriving On Time, by Airport and Summary, Complaint Categories, U.S. Airlines, Time of Day Incident Date, and Companies Other Than Table 4 .....................…9 U.S. Airlines Percentage of All Carriers' Reported Flight Rankings, Table 6 ..............27 Operations Departing On Time, by Airport and Complaint Categories ..............28 Time of Day Table 5 ...................…10 List of Regularly Scheduled Flights Arriving Late 80% of the Time or More Table 6 .......................11 Number and Percentage of Regularly Scheduled Flights Arriving Late 70% of the Time or More Table 7 .......................12 On-Time Arrival and Departure Percentage, by Airport Footnotes .......................14 Appendix .......................15 2 INTRODUCTION The Air Travel Consumer Report is a monthly product of the Department of Transportation's Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings. The report is designed to assist consumers with information on the quality of services provided by the airlines. The report is divided into four sections. These sections deal with flight delays, mishandled baggage, oversales and consumer complaints. Each section of the report is preceded by a brief explanation of how to read and understand the information provided. The report normally is released by the end of the first week of each month. If you are interested in obtaining a single copy, write to the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 7th Street, S.W., C-75/Room 4107, Washington, DC 20590. The report is also available via the Internet at http://www.dot.gov/airconsumer/. 3 FLIGHT DELAYS This section provides information about airline on-time performance and flight delays. Tables 3 and 4 provide information by airport and time of day. Table 5 is a list of the It is based on data filed by airlines each month with the Department of Transportation most frequently delayed flights, showing the percentage of each flight's operations that as required by 14 CFR Part 234 of DOT's regulations. It covers nonstop scheduled- were late that month and the average and median number of minutes the flight was late. service flights between points within the United States (including territories) by the The flights with the highest percentage of late operations are listed first in Table 5; largest U.S. air carriers, i.e., those with at least one percent of total domestic scheduled- where percentages are identical, flights are listed alphabetically by carrier code. Table service passenger revenues. These 10 airlines account for more than 90 percent of 6, like Tables 1, 1A, and 2, presents data by carrier, but lists the carriers in rank order domestic operating revenues. from worst to best based on the number of flights which were late 70% of the time or more. Table 7 lists more than 200 cities in alphabetical order with the corresponding The rule requires carriers to currently report on operations to and from the 29 U.S. on-time arrival and departure percentages. airports that account for at least one percent of the nation's total domestic scheduled- service passenger enplanements (see Appendix for a complete list of the reportable Tables 3, 4, and 5 contain information on the time of day that a flight operated. All airports). However, all 10 airlines have voluntarily provided data for their entire times are local. A 10:50 a.m. departure from Atlanta is 10:50 a.m. Atlanta time; if that domestic systems, and that information is included in this report. flight arrived in Dallas at 11:45 a.m., that is 11:45 a.m. Dallas time. If a flight's scheduled operating time changed during the month, Table 5 shows the time that was A flight is counted as "on time" if it operated less than 15 minutes after the scheduled in effect for the last flight operation performed that month. time shown in the carriers' Computerized Reservations Systems. All tables in this report except Table 4 are based on gate arrival times; Table 4 is based on gate departure This report provides summary information; except for the few flights listed in Table 5, times. Cancelled and diverted operations are counted as late. it does not show the on-time record of individual flights. A printout showing the performance of each specific flight reported to DOT is available for inspection in the As indicated above, a carrier may voluntarily file data for its entire domestic system. Reports Reference Room (room 4201) of the Office of Airline Information at DOT's Tables 2, 3, and 4 are limited to the 29 required or "reportable" airports; Tables 5, 6 and headquarters in Washington, D.C. The on-time performance for individual markets 7 contain data on flights to/from all airports that were reported. Table 1 has one and flights can be searched at http://www.bts.gov/ntda/oai/search.htm. Computer tapes column for the 29 "reportable" airports and another for all of the airports reported; see containing data for all reported flight operations are available for purchase from the footnote C for additional explanation. Transportation Systems Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Department cannot respond to inquiries about the performance of individual flights. Tables 1 through 4 display percentages of flight operations that were on time, while Tables 5 and 6 show service that was late. Tables 1, 1A, and 2 present data by carrier; However, information on the performance of specific flights is displayed on the airlines are ranked by performance in Table 1 and are listed in alphabetical order by Computerized Reservations Systems used by most airlines and travel agencies. Each of carrier code in Table 2 (see Appendix for codes). Beginning with the February 1988 the reporting carriers' flights has a one-digit code between 0 and 9 representing that report, Table 1A shows carrier rankings by month and time-series data on the flight's percentage of on-time operations for the latest reported month. For example, percentage of flight operations that arrived on time. "8" means that flight arrived on time (within 15 minutes) between 80% and 89.9% of the time during the latest reported month. 4 JANUARY 1998 AIR TRAVEL CONSUMER REPORT TABLE 1. OVERALL PERCENTAGE OF REPORTED FLIGHT OPERATIONS ARRIVING ON TIME BY CARRIER AT 29 REPORTABLE AIRPORTS B/ AT ALL REPORTED AIRPORTS C/ ---------------------------- ---------------------------- NUMBER OF PERCENT OF NUMBER OF PERCENT OF AIRPORTS ARRIVALS AIRPORTS ARRIVALS CARRIER A/ REPORTED ON TIME D/ REPORTED ON TIME D/ ------------------------- --------- ----------- --------- ---------- US AIRWAYS S/ 26 80.8 86 80.8 SOUTHWEST S/ 14 77.6 52 79.4 AMERICAN S/ 29 78.2 94 78.6 DELTA S/ 29 75.1 122 75.5 TWA S/ 28 72.6 73 73.3 AMERICA WEST S/ 26 72.6 53 73.1 CONTINENTAL S/ 27 71.2 79 72.2 UNITED S/ 29 69.5 102 69.4 ALASKA S/ 7 66.4 34 69.3 NORTHWEST S/ 28 69.5 114 69.1 T O T A L 74.3 75.1 5 JANUARY 1998 AIR TRAVEL CONSUMER REPORT TABLE 1A. OVERALL PERCENTAGE OF REPORTED FLIGHT OPERATIONS ARRIVING ON TIME AND CARRIER RANK, BY MONTH, QUARTER, AND DATABASE TO DATE 1ST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER 12 MONTHS DATA BASE TO DATE CARRIER JAN-MAR 97 APR-JUN 97 JUL-SEP 97 OCT-DEC 97 NOV 97 DEC 97 JAN 98 FEB97-JAN98 SEP 87-JAN 98 ------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- % RANK % RANK % RANK % RANK % RANK % RANK % RANK % RANK % RANK -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ALASKA 76.1 (4) 82.3 (3) 72.3 (10) 70.3 (10) 73.7 (10) 64.7 (10) 69.3 (9) 74.7 (10) 78.6 (6) AMERICA WEST 74.8 (5) 80.0 (5) 79.9 (6) 75.6 (9) 75.8 (8) 69.5 (8) 73.1 (6) 78.0 (6) 81.8 (2) AMERICAN 72.9 (7) 79.5 (6) 84.0 (3) 79.9 (2) 83.1 (1) 75.1 (2) 78.6 (3) 80.0 (4) 79.9 (4) CONTINENTAL 76.3 (3) 77.7 (9) 80.7 (5) 77.8 (4) 77.7 (6) 75.0 (3) 72.2 (7) 78.2 (5) 78.6 (7) DELTA 71.2 (9) 72.4 (10) 76.7 (9) 75.7 (8) 73.9 (9) 72.9 (6) 75.5 (4) 74.8 (9) 77.3 (9) NORTHWEST 66.0 (10) 78.5 (8) 77.9 (7) 77.0 (6) 76.2 (7) 72.2 (7) 69.1 (10) 75.4 (8) 80.8 (3) SOUTHWEST 78.8 (1) 83.8 (2) 85.3 (2) 79.7 (3) 81.8 (2) 75.0 (4) 79.4 (2) 82.6 (1) 84.3 (1) TWA 73.1 (6) 84.1 (1) 86.1 (1) 77.7 (5) 78.4 (4) 68.0 (9) 73.3 (5) 80.8 (2) 77.5 (8) UNITED 72.1 (8) 78.7 (7) 76.7 (8) 76.3 (7) 78.6 (3) 73.6 (5) 69.4 (8) 76.5 (7) 77.1 (10) US AIRWAYS 78.7 (2) 80.4 (4) 80.8 (4) 80.6 (1) 78.3 (5) 76.6 (1) 80.8 (1) 80.5 (3) 79.2 (5) TOTAL 73.9 79.0 80.3 77.8 78.2 73.5 75.1 78.3 79.2 6 JANUARY 1998 AIR TRAVEL CONSUMER REPORT TABLE 2.
Recommended publications
  • Contents [Edit] Africa

    Contents [Edit] Africa

    Low cost carriers The following is a list of low cost carriers organized by home country. A low-cost carrier or low-cost airline (also known as a no-frills, discount or budget carrier or airline) is an airline that offers generally low fares in exchange for eliminating many traditional passenger services. See the low cost carrier article for more information. Regional airlines, which may compete with low-cost airlines on some routes are listed at the article 'List of regional airlines.' Contents [hide] y 1 Africa y 2 Americas y 3 Asia y 4 Europe y 5 Middle East y 6 Oceania y 7 Defunct low-cost carriers y 8 See also y 9 References [edit] Africa Egypt South Africa y Air Arabia Egypt y Kulula.com y 1Time Kenya y Mango y Velvet Sky y Fly540 Tunisia Nigeria y Karthago Airlines y Aero Contractors Morocco y Jet4you y Air Arabia Maroc [edit] Americas Mexico y Aviacsa y Interjet y VivaAerobus y Volaris Barbados Peru y REDjet (planned) y Peruvian Airlines Brazil United States y Azul Brazilian Airlines y AirTran Airways Domestic y Gol Airlines Routes, Caribbean Routes and y WebJet Linhas Aéreas Mexico Routes (in process of being acquired by Southwest) Canada y Allegiant Air Domestic Routes and International Charter y CanJet (chartered flights y Frontier Airlines Domestic, only) Mexico, and Central America y WestJet Domestic, United Routes [1] States and Caribbean y JetBlue Airways Domestic, Routes Caribbean, and South America Routes Colombia y Southwest Airlines Domestic Routes y Aires y Spirit Airlines Domestic, y EasyFly Caribbean, Central and
  • Airline Competition Plan Final Report

    Airline Competition Plan Final Report

    Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 SUMMARY S-1 Summary AIRLINE COMPETITION PLAN Philadelphia International Airport The City of Philadelphia, owner and operator of Philadelphia International Airport, is required to submit annually to the Federal Aviation Administration an airline competition plan. The City’s plan for 2000, as documented in the accompanying report, provides information regarding the availability of passenger terminal facilities, the use of passenger facility charge (PFC) revenues to fund terminal facilities, airline leasing arrangements, patterns of airline service, and average airfares for passengers originating their journeys at the Airport. The plan also sets forth the City’s current and planned initiatives to encourage competitive airline service at the Airport, construct terminal facilities needed to accommodate additional airline service, and ensure that access is provided to airlines wishing to serve the Airport on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory terms. These initiatives are summarized in the following paragraphs. Encourage New Airline Service Airlines that have recently started scheduled domestic service at Philadelphia International Airport include AirTran Airways, America West Airlines, American Trans Air, Midway Airlines, Midwest Express Airlines, and National Airlines. Airlines that have recently started scheduled international service at the Airport include Air France and Lufthansa. The City intends to continue its programs to encourage airlines to begin or increase service at the Airport.
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes

    Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes

    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
  • Airline Schedules

    Airline Schedules

    Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository:
  • Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999

    Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999

    9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 32/Wednesday, February 18, 1998/Rules and Regulations

    Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 32/Wednesday, February 18, 1998/Rules and Regulations

    8258 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 1998 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Security and Terrorism, Congress and own data collection system, which the Administration acted swiftly to would be approved by the Department. Office of the Secretary amend Section 410 of the Federal The ANPRM posed a series of questions Aviation Act. P.L. 101±604 (entitled the about privacy concerns, current 14 CFR Part 243 Aviation Security Improvement Act of practices in the industry and potential [Docket No. OST±95±950] 1990, or ``ASIA 90,'' and which was impacts on day-to-day operations. later codified as 49 U.S.C. 44909), Twenty six comments were received RIN 2105±AB78 which was signed by President Bush on in response to the ANPRM. Commenters Passenger Manifest Information November 16, 1990, states: included the Air Transport Association of America (ATA), the National Air AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT. SEC. 410. PASSENGER MANIFEST Carrier Association (NACA), the ACTION: Final rule. (a) REQUIREMENT.ÐNot later than Regional Airline Association (RAA), 120 days after the date of enactment of Alaska Airlines, American Trans Air, SUMMARY: This rule requires that this section, the Secretary of the American Society of Travel Agents certificated air carriers and large foreign Transportation shall require all United (ASTA), the group ``Victims of Pan Am air carriers collect the full name of each States air carriers to provide a passenger Flight 103,'' the Asociacion U.S.-citizen traveling on flight segments manifest for any flight to appropriate Internacional de Transporte Aereo to or from the United States and solicit representatives of the United States Latinoamericano (AITAL), a combined a contact name and telephone number.
  • Bankruptcy Tilts Playing Field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 Fboroch@Bear.Com

    Bankruptcy Tilts Playing Field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected]

    Equity Research Airlines / Rated: Market Underweight September 15, 2005 Research Analyst(s): David Strine 212 272-7869 [email protected] Bankruptcy tilts playing field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected] Key Points *** TWIN BANKRUPTCY FILINGS TILT PLAYING FIELD. NWAC and DAL filed for Chapter 11 protection yesterday, becoming the 20 and 21st airlines to do so since 2000. Now with 47% of industry capacity in bankruptcy, the playing field looks set to become even more lopsided pressuring non-bankrupt legacies to lower costs further and low cost carriers to reassess their shrinking CASM advantage. *** CAPACITY PULLBACK. Over the past 20 years, bankrupt carriers decreased capacity by 5-10% on avg in the year following their filing. If we assume DAL and NWAC shrink by 7.5% (the midpoint) in '06, our domestic industry ASM forecast goes from +2% y/y to flat, which could potentially be favorable for airline pricing (yields). *** NWAC AND DAL INTIMATE CAPACITY RESTRAINT. After their filing yesterday, NWAC's CEO indicated 4Q:05 capacity could decline 5-6% y/y, while Delta announced plans to accelerate its fleet simplification plan, removing four aircraft types by the end of 2006. *** BIGGEST BENEFICIARIES LIKELY TO BE LOW COST CARRIERS. NWAC and DAL account for roughly 26% of domestic capacity, which, if trimmed by 7.5% equates to a 2% pt reduction in industry capacity. We believe LCC-heavy routes are likely to see a disproportionate benefit from potential reductions at DAL and NWAC, with AAI, AWA, and JBLU in particular having an easier path for growth.
  • RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty

    RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty

    RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty ‐ Ninth Regional Aviation Safety Group — Pan America Executive Steering Committee Meeting (RASG‐PA ESC/29) ICAO NACC Regional Office, Mexico City, Mexico, 29‐30 November 2017 Agenda Item 3: Items/Briefings of interest to the RASG‐PA ESC PROPOSAL TO AMEND ICAO FLIGHT DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMME (FDAP) RECOMMENDATION AND STANDARD TO EXPAND AEROPLANES´ WEIGHT THRESHOLD (Presented by Flight Safety Foundation and supported by Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Flight Data Analysis Program (FDAP) working group comprised by representatives of Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP, is in the process of preparing a proposal to expand the number of functional flight data analysis programs. It is anticipated that a greater number of Flight Data Analysis Programs will lead to significantly greater safety levels through analysis of critical event sets and incidents. Action: The FDAP working group is requesting support for greater implementation of FDAP/FDMP throughout the Pan American Regions and consideration of new ICAO standards through the actions outlined in Section 4 of this working paper. Strategic Safety Objectives: References: Annex 6 ‐ Operation of Aircraft, Part 1 sections as mentioned in this working paper RASG‐PA ESC/28 ‐ WP/09 presented at the ICAO SAM Regional Office, 4 to 5 May 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1 Flight Data Recorders have long been used as one of the most important tools for accident investigations such that the term “black box” and its recovery is well known beyond the aviation industry.
  • Comments C-7198 TTD 4/1/2019

    Comments C-7198 TTD 4/1/2019

    COMMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION TRADES DEPARTMENT, AFL-CIO __________________________________ BEFORE THE NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD ON DECERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES DOCKET NO. C-7198 April 1, 2019 The Unions that comprise the Transportation Trades Department of the AFL-CIO (“TTD”) hereby submit these comments regarding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) issued by the National Mediation Board (“NMB” or “Board”) on January 31, 2019. 84 Fed. Reg. 612 (Jan. 31, 2019). These 32 affiliated unions represent employees in all modes of transportation, including railroad and airline employees covered by the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”).1 TTD welcomes the opportunity to submit comments to the NMB regarding its recent proposed 1 Specifically, TTD aviation and rail unions covered by the RLA include: Air Line Pilots Association (“ALPA”); Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (“AFA-CWA”); American Train Dispatchers Association (“ATDA”); Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (“BRS”); Communications Workers of America (“CWA”); International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (“IAM”); International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers (“IBB”); International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“IBEW”); National Conference of Firemen and Oilers, District of Local 32BJ, SEIU (“NCFO”); Office and Professional Employees International Union (“OPEIU”); Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (“SMART”); SMART-Transportation Division; Transportation Communications Union/IAM (“TCU”); Transport Workers Union of America (“TWU”); and UNITE HERE. decertification procedure rule-making. TTD strongly opposes the Board’s proposed rulemaking. The NPRM is inconsistent with the RLA. The proposed rules changes exceed the scope of the Board’s narrow jurisdiction under Section 2, Ninth and unreasonably restrict employees’ exercise of the right to choose representation under the statute.
  • Community Relations Plan

    Community Relations Plan

    Miami International Airport Community Relations Plan Preface .............................................................................................................. 1 Overview of the CRP ......................................................................................... 2 NCP Background ............................................................................................... 3 National Contingency Plan .............................................................................................................. 3 Government Oversight.................................................................................................................... 4 Site Description and History ............................................................................. 5 Site Description .............................................................................................................................. 5 Site History .................................................................................................................................... 5 Goals of the CRP ............................................................................................... 8 Community Relations Activities........................................................................ 9 Appendix A – Site Map .................................................................................... 10 Appendix B – Contact List............................................................................... 11 Federal Officials ..........................................................................................................................
  • Airport, Port, and Ferry System

    Airport, Port, and Ferry System

    Section 7: Airports and Ports BATS Section 7: Airports and Port Section 7.1: LPA Group, Transportation Consultants Study The Glynn County Airport Commission hired the LPA Group, Transportation Consultants, to consider the influences affecting the demand for aviation facilities and services within the Glynn County and South Georgia airport market area, and to develop a plan to safely and efficiently meet anticipated airport needs for the next twenty-year planning horizon. Information from the LPA Group, Transportation Consultants, study, is used extensively. Section 7.1 (a): History of Brunswick Golden Isles Airport Figure 7-1 http://www.glynncountyairports.com/media.html Figure 7-1 shows the Brunswick Golden Isles Airport, or BQK, as it existed during World War II. The BQK is a public owned facility, whereby its current role in the national aviation system is to meet the needs of general aviation patrons, commercial passengers, air cargo operators, and other airport tenants. The existing and potential role of any airport is determined by factors such as historical events, geographic location, acreage, and surface transportation. The Airport came into existence because of being selected by the U.S. Navy as the site for one of a network of air stations established to patrol coastal shipping lanes for German U-boats. Construction on the air station began in September of 1942 and completed in January 1943. The U.S. Navy decommissioned the airfield in 1958. Commercial service at BQK Airport began in February of 1970 when Delta Airlines began serving the airport. The BQK is a commercial service-primary airport located 5 miles north of downtown Brunswick in Glynn County.