DOCSLIB.ORG

RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty ‐ Ninth Regional Aviation Safety Group — Pan America Executive Steering Committee Meeting (RASG‐PA ESC/29) ICAO NACC Regional Office, Mexico City, Mexico, 29‐30 November 2017 Agenda Item 3: Items/Briefings of interest to the RASG‐PA ESC PROPOSAL TO AMEND ICAO FLIGHT DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMME (FDAP) RECOMMENDATION AND STANDARD TO EXPAND AEROPLANES´ WEIGHT THRESHOLD (Presented by Flight Safety Foundation and supported by Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Flight Data Analysis Program (FDAP) working group comprised by representatives of Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP, is in the process of preparing a proposal to expand the number of functional flight data analysis programs. It is anticipated that a greater number of Flight Data Analysis Programs will lead to significantly greater safety levels through analysis of critical event sets and incidents. Action: The FDAP working group is requesting support for greater implementation of FDAP/FDMP throughout the Pan American Regions and consideration of new ICAO standards through the actions outlined in Section 4 of this working paper. Strategic Safety Objectives: References: Annex 6 ‐ Operation of Aircraft, Part 1 sections as mentioned in this working paper RASG‐PA ESC/28 ‐ WP/09 presented at the ICAO SAM Regional Office, 4 to 5 May 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1 Flight Data Recorders have long been used as one of the most important tools for accident investigations such that the term “black box” and its recovery is well known beyond the aviation industry. The safety advances in the industry from flight data recorders have been invaluable. RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 — 2 — 1.2 As Flight Data Recorder technology has advanced, the aircraft operators around the world have sought to make use of this data in their safety management systems under Flight Data Analysis/Monitoring FDAP/FDAM programs. 1.3 As a result of both the learning from accident investigations and the desire to learn more from current operational data, the ICAO council adopted a proposal on FDAP/FDMP programs that first became applicable in November 1, 2001. Subsequently this was revised through Amendment 30 in 2006. The latest language of Annex 6, Part 1 (Edition 10, Amendment 41) Chapter 3 states: 3.3 SAFETY MANAGEMENT 3.3.1 Recommendation.— The operator of an aeroplane of a certificated take‐off mass in excess of 20 000 kg should establish and maintain a flight data analysis programme as part of its safety management system. 3.3.2 The operator of an aeroplane of a maximum certificated take‐off mass in excess of 27 000 kg shall establish and maintain a flight data analysis programme as part of its safety management system. Note.‐ The operator may contract the operation of a flight data analysis programme to another party while retaining overall responsibility for the maintenance of such a programme. 3.3.3 A flight data analysis programme shall be non‐punitive and contain adequate safeguards to protect the source(s) of the data. Note 1.‐ Guidance on the establishment of flight data analysis programmes is included in the Manual on Flight Data Analysis Programmes (FDAP) (Doc 10000). Note 2.‐ Legal guidance for the protection of information from safety data collection and processing systems is contained in Attachment B to the first edition of Annex 19. 3.3.4 The operator shall establish a flight safety documents system, for the use and guidance of operational personnel, as part of its safety management system. Note.‐ Guidance on the development and organization of a flight safety documents system is provided in Attachment F. 1.4 Now after two decades of flight data analysis programs, much has changed in the costs and potential benefits of these programs. Early programs were often burdened by the costs of specific aircraft configurations to support FDAP/FDMP with Quick Access Recorders (QARs), computer storage devices for extracted data, software analysis packages, staff headcount to manage the programs and more. The analysis capability has expanded and now benefits many aspects of safety and operational efficiency. RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 — 3 — 1.5 The RASG‐PA FDAP working group was assembled to examine current costs and benefits with the objective of promoting greater participation in FDAP/FDMP programs on all aeroplanes equipped with Flight Data Recorders. This would target aeroplanes over 5 700 kg up to 27 000 kg. There is no current requirement for FDAP/FDMP programs between 5 700 kg and 20 000 kg AND it is only recommended for aeroplanes from 20 000 kg up to 27 000 kg. 1.6 As a result of the review, a new alternative recommendation and standard proposal to expand weight threshold are as follows: 3.3.1 Recommendation.‐ All aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take‐off mass over 5 700 kg should be equipped with a Quick Access Recorder (QAR). This QAR should record at a minimum the parameters recorded by the Flight Data Recorder and the operator should establish and maintain a flight data analysis programme as part of its safety management system. 3.3.2 All aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take‐off mass over 5 700kg for which the individual certificate of airworthiness has been first issued on or after 1 January 2005 shall be equipped with a Quick Access Recorder (QAR). This QAR shall record at a minimum the parameters recorded by the Flight Data Recorder and the operator shall establish and maintain a flight data analysis programme as part of its safety management system. 2. Cost Benefit Analysis for Flight Data Analysis/Monitoring Programs 2.1 The RASG‐PA FDAP working group has completed a cost benefit report as of September 2017. The document describes the most likely areas of costs for implementing a FDAP/FDMP program with current operations with a special focus on organizations operating aeroplanes in the 5 700 kg to 20 000 kg MTOW range. The report is included as Appendix A to this working paper. 2.2 The report references many of the original implementation considerations and how those have changed. It provides operators and other stakeholders with greater tools to determine their current implementation costs, including optional costs on aircraft configuration. 2.3 Benefits are described in terms of the potential improvements that could be achieved in existing accident rates. The document recognizes that original FDAP/FDMP programs did not forecast a specific rate reduction before programs were adopted. Yet over the past twenty years improvements continue and accident rates are lower than ever before. Implementation may make much more practical sense today as costs have become much more affordable. 2.4 A review of the current accidents in the 5 700 to 27 000 Kg MTOW range is provided for the Pan American region in the cost benefit analysis (CBA) Appendix A1. RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 — 4 — 2.5 A review of all worldwide aeroplanes with MTOW between 5 700 kg to 27 000 kg and organizations operating aeroplanes with that range is also provided in CBA Appendix A2 and A3. It should be noted that a sizeable portion of the existing aircraft are likely to already be operating with on‐ going FDAP/FDMP programs. Both of these can be used for determination of the level of operations impacted by a proposal to implement FDAP/FDMP programs. In Appendix B, a costs and benefits spreadsheet is attached. 3. The need for a Business Case 3.1 In order to accomplish the expansion in implementation, a business case is essential to describe both the costs and benefits. This CBA recognizes the much more affordable options to FDAP/FDMP implementation and helps to provide a compelling story for action. This CBA also provides the necessary tools for organizations and States to assemble this business case as best suites their requirements. 3.2 Ultimately, this can lead to a specific proposal to the ICAO Air Navigation Commission (ANC) for adoption as new ICAO standard. 3.3 In the meantime, the RASG‐PA FDAP working group recommends formulating an immediate safety enhancement to be considered by Industry in Pan American RASG‐PA States. The FDAP standard proposal would be brought to RASG‐PA Plenary using the fast track mechanism, considering that the next RASG‐PA Plenary will take place in approximately two years, and to the Pan American RSOOs and RAIOs for coordination and promotion. 4. Suggested actions 4.1 The RASG‐PA ESC/29 is invited to take note of this working paper, make comments and circulate a proposal of conclusion to be adopted by RASG‐PA members as follows: a) States take note of the results of the cost‐benefit analysis (CBA) developed by RASGPA FDAP working group for the implementation of FDAP on aeroplanes over 5 700 kg; b) States and RSOO to consider the incorporation of a requirement in their national/regional regulations; and c) Request to the ICAO ANC to take note on the results of the CBA and consider an amendment to Annex 6 Part I FDAP Recommendation 3.3.1 and Standard 3.3.2 of Section 3.3, as worded in 1.6 of this working paper. — — — — — — — — — — — COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR EXTENDING ICAO’S ANNEX 6, PART I, STANDARD 3.3.2 1 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1. BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................2 CHAPTER 2. JUSTIFICATION FOR THE NEW STANDARD...........................................................................5 CHAPTER 3. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS .........................................................................................................7 3.1. ASSUMPTIONS OF THE MODEL.........................................................................................................7 3.1.1. QAR vs. FDR........................................................................................................................8 3.1.2. In-house vs. Outsourced Flight Data Analysis.....................................................................9 3.1.3.
Recommended publications
  • CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK

    CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK

    CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK-HFM Tupolev Tu-134 CSA -large OK on fin 91 2 £3 CC211 G-31-962 HP Jetstream 31 American eagle 92 2 £1 CC368 N4213X Douglas DC-6 Northern Air Cargo 88 4 £2 CC373 G-BFPV C-47 ex Spanish AF T3-45/744-45 78 1 £4 CC446 G31-862 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC487 CS-TKC Boeing 737-300 Air Columbus 93 3 £2 CC489 PT-OKF DHC8/300 TABA 93 2 £2 CC510 G-BLRT Short SD-360 ex Air Business 87 1 £2 CC567 N400RG Boeing 727 89 1 £2 CC573 G31-813 HP Jetstream 31 white 88 1 £1 CC574 N5073L Boeing 727 84 1 £2 CC595 G-BEKG HS 748 87 2 £2 CC603 N727KS Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC608 N331QQ HP Jetstream 31 white 88 2 £1 CC610 D-BERT DHC8 Contactair c/s 88 5 £1 CC636 C-FBIP HP Jetstream 31 white 88 3 £1 CC650 HZ-DG1 Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC732 D-CDIC SAAB SF-340 Delta Air 89 1 £2 CC735 C-FAMK HP Jetstream 31 Canadian partner/Air Toronto 89 1 £2 CC738 TC-VAB Boeing 737 Sultan Air 93 1 £2 CC760 G31-841 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC762 C-GDBR HP Jetstream 31 Air Toronto 89 3 £1 CC821 G-DVON DH Devon C.2 RAF c/s VP955 89 1 £1 CC824 G-OOOH Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 3 £1 CC826 VT-EPW Boeing 747-300 Air India 89 3 £1 CC834 G-OOOA Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 4 £1 CC876 G-BHHU Short SD-330 89 3 £1 CC901 9H-ABE Boeing 737 Air Malta 88 2 £1 CC911 EC-ECR Boeing 737-300 Air Europa 89 3 £1 CC922 G-BKTN HP Jetstream 31 Euroflite 84 4 £1 CC924 I-ATSA Cessna 650 Aerotaxisud 89 3 £1 CC936 C-GCPG Douglas DC-10 Canadian 87 3 £1 CC940 G-BSMY HP Jetstream 31 Pan Am Express 90 2 £2 CC945 7T-VHG Lockheed C-130H Air Algerie
  • Alte Bergstrasse 14 8303 Bassersdorf Fax +41 43 556 81 19 Switzerland Order@Jjpostcards.Com

    Alte Bergstrasse 14 8303 Bassersdorf Fax +41 43 556 81 19 Switzerland [email protected]

    Alte Bergstrasse 14 8303 Bassersdorf Fax +41 43 556 81 19 Switzerland [email protected] 2019-4 August 2019 Die Welt der Flugzeugpostkarten The World of Aviation Postcards Super Neuheiten für Ihre Sammlung – Great New Postcards for your Collection Bestellen Sie von unseren neuen Sammler-Postkarten Get some of our great new collector postcards Nouvelles cartes postales Neuheiten aus aller Welt, zum Beispiel New picture postcards from all over the world, for example Nouveautés de toutes les régions du monde, par exemple Neue Fluggesellschaften / New airline companies / Compagnies aériennes: Apollo Airways, Azimut, Bamboo Airways, Eastern Airlines (2018- / ex Dynamic), Gulf Aviation, Lao Air Llines (1967-1973), Nomad Aviation, Primera Air Nordic (Lettland/Latvia), Travel Service Poland, Wimbi Dira Airways – WDA Neuer Satz von jjPostcards, Mix von älteren und aktuellen Aufnahmen – new set published by jjPostcards with a mix of old and modern views (Seaboard 707, Azimut SSJ 100 etc.) Wimbi Dira Airways, in operation 2003 – ca. 2010/2014 – komplette Flotte / complete fleet: DC-3, DC-9, Boeing 727, Boeing 707 Schöne Auswahl von Thailand – Great selection from Thailand: Nok Air DHC-8 + Boeing 737, Thai Air Asia Airbus A320 www.jjpostcards.com Webshop mit bald 35.000 Flugzeugpostkarten – jede AK mit Scan der Vorder- und Rückseite Visit our web shop, nearly 35.000 aviation postcards – each card with scan of front and back boutique en ligne avec bientôt 35.000 cartes postales – chaque carte avec scan recto/verso Name ________________________
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
  • Opening Statement, Lynne Embleton, CEO, Aer Lingus

    Opening Statement, Lynne Embleton, CEO, Aer Lingus

    Supplemental Aer Lingus Opening Statement to Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications Committee – 22nd June 2021 Introduction Thank you for the opportunity to engage - once again - with the Transport and Communications committee. I will assume you have read the Aer Lingus opening statement which was originally due to be delivered on 2nd June. On this basis I won’t read that statement but everything in it still stands. I would however like to briefly supplement it to highlight some specific issues that need to be addressed urgently. Stobart Stobart Air informed Aer Lingus on 11th June that they were ceasing to trade with immediate effect resulting in the cancellation of all Aer Lingus Regional flights operated by Stobart Air. Stobart attributed this decision to the continuing impact of the pandemic which has resulted in almost no flying since March 2020. Aer Lingus stepped in immediately to operate six routes until at least the end of August and arranged for BA City Flyer to operate four of the routes. The provision of this replacement schedule has ensured that all impacted customers due to travel in the immediate term were offered alternative travel arrangements. Aer Lingus also confirmed that we are ready to operate the Dublin / Kerry route, subject to an appropriate PSO arrangement being put in place and that we are actively exploring options that would enable the provision of a Dublin / Donegal service. Aer Lingus and other key stakeholders in the aviation sector have consistently warned that Ireland’s 15-month long implementation of the most restrictive travel policies in Europe without sector specific supports being provided, represented a critical risk to aviation jobs and to connectivity.
  • 2020 CP Point-Vols-1

    2020 CP Point-Vols-1

    Point de situation 1 Information sur l’état des vols à destination de la métropole 19 mars 2020 Des mesures de restrictions des vols commerciaux sont actuellement en cours sur les îles de Saint-Barthélemy et de Saint-Martin. Point Air France et Air Antilles Les vols au départ de Juliana à Sint-Maarten et à destination de la métropole sont maintenus jusqu’à dimanche inclus. Les passa"ers déjà détenteurs d’un #illet $ir %rance à destination de la métropole pour un départ prévu ultérieurement et qui souhaitent avancer leur retour sont priés de se présenter tous les jours à &' h à l’aéroport de Juliana pour (tre placés sur liste d attente. Les vols retours postérieurs à dimanche ne sont pour le moment pas garantis. )ertains vols $ir $ntilles au départ de Grand )ase +spérance sont maintenus et disposent encore de places disponi#les. Les voya"eurs souhaitant se rendre en Guadeloupe peuvent contacter la compa"nie aérienne pour l’achat de #illets. Attention : les liaisons avec les vols Air France au départ de Pointe à Pitre et à destination de Paris ne sont pas garantis. Point Air Cara!"es Les vols de vendredi et dimanche au départ de Juliana sont annulés. Les retours en métropole via ,ointe à ,itre au départ de l’aéroport de Grand-)ase +spérance ne sont pas "arantis. En e--et, s’il reste possi#le de rallier Pointe à Pitre, la liaison long courrier de Pointe à Pitre jus$u’en métropole est complète jus$u’au 26 mars. Les voya"eurs risquent donc de devoir (tre con-inés plusieurs jours en Guadeloupe ou en Martinique.
  • CAMSAP 2013, Saint Martin

    CAMSAP 2013, Saint Martin

    CAMSAP 2013Saint Martin December 15-18, 2013 Conference Committee General co-chairs Aleksandar Dogandzic Martin Haardt Iowa State University Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany Technical co-chairs Saeed Gazor Volkan Cevher Queens University, Canada EPFL, Switzerland Publicity Chair Local Arrangement Chair Pu Wang Jean-Yves Tourneret Stevens Institute of Technology University of Toulouse, ENSEEIHT-IRIT-TéSA, France Finance chair Hongya Ge New Jersey Institute of Technology Time and Place • Sunday 15 – Wednesday 18, December 2013 • Saint Martin, Radisson Blu Resort, Marina, and Spa Flights to Saint Martin • American Airlines: - 1 direct flight daily from New York and Miami, 3 direct flights daily from San Juan, - connections and daily indirect flights to other US cities; • US Airways - daily direct flights from Philadelphia and Charlotte, - connections to other US cities; • United - from Chicago twice weekly, - connections to other US cities; • Delta - daily direct flights from Atlanta; • JetBlue - daily direct flights from New York City; • Spirit - from Miami. From Canada • Air Transat - weekly direct flights from Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary and Halifax; • Air Canada - direct flights from Toronto in high season, weekly flights all year round via Pointe-à-Pitre (Guadeloupe). Flights to Saint Martin (cont.) • Air France - between 5 and 7 direct flight a week in low and high season respectively from Paris; • Air Caraibes - 3 direct flights a week on Tuesday, Saturday and Sunday from Paris; • Corsairfly - Daily flights from Paris via Pointe-à-Pitre; •KLM - Direct flights from Amsterdam • High season (November to March) : 3 weekly flights on Monday, Thursday, and Saturday, • Low season (April to October) : 2 weekly flights on Thursday and Saturday.
  • Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999

    Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999

    9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680.
  • Attachment F – Participants in the Agreement

    Attachment F – Participants in the Agreement

    Revenue Accounting Manual B16 ATTACHMENT F – PARTICIPANTS IN THE AGREEMENT 1. TABULATION OF PARTICIPANTS 0B 475 BLUE AIR AIRLINE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS S.R.L. 1A A79 AMADEUS IT GROUP SA 1B A76 SABRE ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD. 1G A73 Travelport International Operations Limited 1S A01 SABRE INC. 2D 54 EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC 2I 156 STAR UP S.A. 2I 681 21 AIR LLC 2J 226 AIR BURKINA 2K 547 AEROLINEAS GALAPAGOS S.A. AEROGAL 2T 212 TIMBIS AIR SERVICES 2V 554 AMTRAK 3B 383 Transportes Interilhas de Cabo Verde, Sociedade Unipessoal, SA 3E 122 MULTI-AERO, INC. DBA AIR CHOICE ONE 3J 535 Jubba Airways Limited 3K 375 JETSTAR ASIA AIRWAYS PTE LTD 3L 049 AIR ARABIA ABDU DHABI 3M 449 SILVER AIRWAYS CORP. 3S 875 CAIRE DBA AIR ANTILLES EXPRESS 3U 876 SICHUAN AIRLINES CO. LTD. 3V 756 TNT AIRWAYS S.A. 3X 435 PREMIER TRANS AIRE INC. 4B 184 BOUTIQUE AIR, INC. 4C 035 AEROVIAS DE INTEGRACION REGIONAL 4L 174 LINEAS AEREAS SURAMERICANAS S.A. 4M 469 LAN ARGENTINA S.A. 4N 287 AIR NORTH CHARTER AND TRAINING LTD. 4O 837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. 4S 644 SOLAR CARGO, C.A. 4U 051 GERMANWINGS GMBH 4X 805 MERCURY AIR CARGO, INC. 4Z 749 SA AIRLINK 5C 700 C.A.L. CARGO AIRLINES LTD. 5J 203 CEBU PACIFIC AIR 5N 316 JOINT-STOCK COMPANY NORDAVIA - REGIONAL AIRLINES 5O 558 ASL AIRLINES FRANCE 5T 518 CANADIAN NORTH INC. 5U 911 TRANSPORTES AEREOS GUATEMALTECOS S.A. 5X 406 UPS 5Y 369 ATLAS AIR, INC. 50 Standard Agreement For SIS Participation – B16 5Z 225 CEMAIR (PTY) LTD.
  • Bab Iii Analisis Deskriptif 3.1 Data Umum 3.1.1 Sejarah Pt

    Bab Iii Analisis Deskriptif 3.1 Data Umum 3.1.1 Sejarah Pt

    BAB III ANALISIS DESKRIPTIF 3.1 DATA UMUM 3.1.1 SEJARAH PT GAPURA ANGKASA Tuntutan kegiatan operasional pada dunia kedirgantaraan yang mengharuskan maskapai penerbangan agar dapat memberikan pelayanan operasional secara cepat, tepat, dan akurat tanpa mengabaikan prosedur keselamatan semakin jelas terlihat pada era modern seperti sekarang ini. Demikian juga yang dirasakan oleh PT Garuda Indonesia selaku maskapai penerbangan nasional milik Republik Indonesia, dimana selama ini maskapai tersebut menangani secara tunggal proses operasional kegiatan penerbangan yang ada yakni mulai dari keberangkatan pesawat (pre flight) hingga kedatangan pesawat (post flight) tanpa adanya keterlibatan pihak perantara yang bertindak sebagai jasa penunjang pelayanan kegiatan operasional darat (ground handling). Atas dasar hal tersebutlah mengapa kemudian PT Gapura Angkasa selaku perusahaan ground handling yang menangani secara khusus maskapai penerbangan Garuda Indonesia didirikan. PT Gapura Angkasa sendiri berdiri pada tanggal 26 Januari 1998 dengan nama perusahaan pada saat awal berdiri yakni Gapura, dimana dalam pendiriannya perusahaan ini di modali oleh tiga perusahaan BUMN yakni PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero), serta PT Angkasa Pura II (Persero). Kerjasama antara ketiga perusahaan milik negara tersebut mengacu pada Keputusan Menteri Keuangan dengan Nomor SR 04/MK/016/1996 dan juga 23 akta no.32 tanggal 26 Januari tahun 1998. Identitas PT Gapura Angkasa sebagai perusahaan ground handling bagi maskapai penerbangan nasional nomor wahid tersebut juga dipertegas dengan mayoritas kepemilikan saham PT Garuda Indonesia di PT Gapura Angkasa yang jumlahnya mencapai 1.263.360 (Satu Juta Dua Ratus Enam Puluh Tiga Ribu Tiga Ratus Enam Puluh) atau dengan prosentase saham persero sebesar 58,75 % mulai tanggal 9 Desember 2014.
  • Economic Impact of the Development of Dublin Airport As a Hub

    Economic Impact of the Development of Dublin Airport As a Hub

    Economic Impact of the development of Dublin Airport as a Hub Reliance Restricted 07 September 2018 | Final Ernst & Young Tel: + 353 1 475 0555 Business Advisory Services Fax: + 353 1 475 0599 Harcourt Centre ey.com Harcourt Street Dublin 2 Ireland Reliance Restricted 07 September 2018 Donal Moriarty Chief Corporate Affairs Officer Aer Lingus Hangar 6 Dublin Airport Dublin Economic impact of the development of Dublin Airport as a Hub Dear Donal In accordance with the terms of the engagement letter with you, we have assisted you in the assessment of the economic impact of the development of Dublin Airport as a Hub (“The Purpose”). This report sets out our assessment of these risks. Limitations of Scope We have not, except to such extent as you requested and we agreed in writing, sought to verify the accuracy of the data, information and explanations provided by yourselves, and you are solely responsible for this data, information and explanations. We have therefore relied on the information provided by you to be accurate and complete in all material respects. Use and distribution of this report Ernst & Young only accepts responsibility to the addressees of this letter on the basis of the engagement agreement and assumes no responsibility whatsoever in respect of or arising out of or in connection with the contents of this letter to parties other than yourselves. If other parties choose to rely in any way on the contents of this letter they do so entirely at their own risk. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Ernst & Young and its members, employees and agents do not accept or assume any responsibility or liability in respect of this report, or decisions based on it, to any reader of the report.
  • Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (A Public Limited Liability Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Norway)

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (A Public Limited Liability Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Norway)

    REGISTRATION DOCUMENT Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Norway) For the definitions of capitalised terms used throughout this Registration Document, see Section 13 “Definitions and Glossary”. Investing in the Shares involves risks; see Section 1 “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5. Investing in the Shares, including the Offer Shares, and other securities issued by the Issuer involves a particularly high degree of risk. Prospective investors should read the entire Prospectus, comprising of this Registration Document, the Securities Note dated 6 May 2021 and the Summary dated 6 May 2021, and, in particular, consider the risk factors set out in this Registration Document and the Securities Note when considering an investment in the Company. The Company has been severely impacted by the current outbreak of COVID-19. In a very short time period, the Company has lost most of its revenues and is in adverse financial distress. This has adversely and materially affected the Group’s contracts, rights and obligations, including financing arrangements, and the Group is not capable of complying with its ongoing obligations and is currently subject to event of default. On 18 November 2020, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries applied for Examinership in Ireland (and were accepted into Examinership on 7 December 2020), and on 8 December 2020 the Company applied for and was accepted into Reconstruction in Norway. These processes were sanctioned by the Irish and Norwegian courts on 26 March 2021 and 12 April 2021 respectively, however remain subject to potential appeals in Norway (until 12 May 2021) and certain other conditions precedent, including but not limited to the successful completion of a capital raise in the amount of at least NOK 4,500 million (including the Rights Issue, the Private Placement and issuance of certain convertible hybrid instruments as described further herein).
  • Boating on the Nile

    Boating on the Nile

    United Nations Mission September 2010 InSUDAN Boating on the Nile Published by UNMIS Public Information Office INSIDE 8 August: Meeting with Minister of Humanitarian Affairs Mutrif Siddiq, Joint Special Representative for Darfur 3 Special Focus: Transport Ibrahim Gambari expressed regrets on behalf of the • On every corner Diary African Union-UN Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) over • Boating on the Nile recent events in Kalma and Hamadiya internally displaced persons (IDP) camps in • Once a lifeline South Darfur and their possible negative impacts on the future of the peace process. • Keeping roads open • Filling southern skies 9 August: Blue Nile State members of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) and National Congress Party (NCP) formed a six-member parliamentary committee charged with raising awareness about popular consultations on Comprehensive Peace Agreement 10 Photo gallery implementation in the state. The Sufi way 10 August: The SPLM and NCP began pre-referendum talks on wealth and power-sharing, 12 Profile demarcating the border, defining citizenship and sharing the Nile waters in preparation for the Knowledge as food southern self-determination vote, scheduled for 9 January 2011. 14 August: Two Jordanian police advisors with UNAMID were abducted in Nyala, Southern Darfur, 13 Environment as they were walking to a UNAMID transport dispatch point 100 meters from their residence. Reclaiming the trees Three days later the two police advisors were released unharmed in Kass, Southern Darfur. 14 Communications 16 August: Members of the Southern Sudan Human Rights Commission elected a nine-member The voice of Miraya steering committee to oversee its activities as the region approaches the self-determination referendum three days later the two police advisor were released unharmed in Kass, Southern Darfur.