DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Journal C 171 of the European Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Journal C 171 of the European Union Official Journal C 171 of the European Union Volume 62 English edition Information and Notices 20 May 2019 Contents I Resolutions, recommendations and opinions OPINIONS European Commission 2019/C 171/01 Commission Opinion of 16y Ma 2019 relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the dismantling of reactor working areas R1 and R2 of Unit 1 of the Ignalina nuclear power plant located in Lithuania ............................................................................................................... 1 IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES Council 2019/C 171/02 Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria ................................................................................. 3 2019/C 171/03 Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/798 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply .......................................................... 4 EN European Commission 2019/C 171/04 Euro exchange rates .............................................................................................................. 5 2019/C 171/05 Commission Implementing Decision of 7 May 2019 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of an application for amendment of a specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Valle d’Itria (PGI)) ..................................................................................................... 6 Court of Auditors 2019/C 171/06 Special Report No 6/2019 — ‘Tackling fraud in EU cohesion spending: managing authorities need to strengthen detection, response and coordination’ ....................................................................... 23 V Announcements PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY European Commission 2019/C 171/07 Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9287 — Connect Airways/Flybe) (1) ............................ 24 (1) Text with EEA relevance. 20.5.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 171/1 I (Resolutions, recommendations and opinions) OPINIONS EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMMISSION OPINION of 16 May 2019 relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the dismantling of reactor working areas R1 and R2 of Unit 1 of the Ignalina nuclear power plant located in Lithuania (only the Lithuanian text is authentic) (2019/C 171/01) The assessment below is carried out under the provisions of the Euratom Treaty, without prejudice to any additional assessments to be carried out under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the obligations stemming from it and from secondary legislation (1). On 13 November 2018 the European Commission received from the Government of Lithuania, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty, General Data relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste (2) arising from the dismantling of reactor working areas R1 and R2 of Unit 1 of the Ignalina nuclear power plant. On the basis of these data and additional information requested by the Commission on 21 December 2018 and provided by the Lithuanian authorities on 6 February 2019, and following consultation with the Group of Experts, the Commission has drawn up the following opinion: 1. The distance between the site and the nearest border with another Member State, in this case Latvia is 8 km. The next nearest Member State is Poland at a distance of about 250 km. The border of the Republic of Belarus, as neighbouring country, is at a distance of 5 km. 2. Normal dismantling operations will not lead to discharges of liquid radioactive effluents. During normal dismantling operations, the discharge of gaseous radioactive effluents are not liable to cause an exposure of the population in another Member State or in a third country that would be significant from the point of view of health, in respect of the dose limits laid down in the Basic Safety Standards Directive (3). 3. Solid radioactive waste will be transferred to appropriate treatment, storage or disposal facilities present on the Ignalina site. Non-radioactive solid waste and residual materials in compliance with clearance levels will be released from regulatory control for disposal as conventional waste or for reuse or recycling. This will be done in compliance with the criteria laid down in the Basic Safety Standards Directive. (1) For instance, under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, environmental aspects should be further assessed. Indicatively, the Commission would like to draw attention to the provisions of Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU; to Directive 2001/42/EC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, as well as to Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora and to Directive 2000/60/EC establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. (2) The disposal of radioactive waste in the meaning of point 1 of Commission Recommendation 2010/635/Euratom of 11 October 2010 on the application of Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty (OJ L 279, 23.10.2010, p. 36). (3) Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation. C 171/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.5.2019 4. In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents that may follow the accidents of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses likely to be received by the population of another Member State or a third country would not be significant from the point of view of health, in respect of the reference levels laid down in the Basic Safety Standards Directive. In conclusion, the Commission is of the opinion that the implementation of the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste in whatever form, arising from the dismantling of reactor working areas R1 and R2 of unit-1 of the Ignalina power plant located in Lithuania, both in normal operation and in the event of the accidents of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, is not liable to result in a radioactive contamination, significant from the point of view of health, of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State or a of third country, in respect of the provisions laid down in the Basic Safety Standards Directive. Done at Brussels, 16 May 2019. For the Commission Miguel ARIAS CAÑETE Member of the Commission 20.5.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 171/3 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES COUNCIL Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (2019/C 171/02) The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/798 (4), concerning restrictive mea­ sures in view of the situation in Syria. The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 should continue to apply to those persons and entities. The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the compe­ tent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 16 of the Regulation). The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 28 February 2020, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address: Council of the European Union General Secretariat RELEX.1.C Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel BELGIQUE/BELGIË Email: [email protected] Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, pursuant to Article 34 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Article 32(4) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, of the list of designated persons and entities. (1) OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14. (2) OJ L 132, 20.5.2019, p. 36. (3) OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1. (4) OJ L 132, 20.5.2019, p. 1. C 171/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.5.2019 Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/798 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply (2019/C 171/03) The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Determining the Classification of Vine Varieties Has Become Difficult to Understand Because of the Large Whereas Article 31
    31 . 12 . 81 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 381 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 3800/81 of 16 December 1981 determining the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/ 70 ( 4), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 591 /80 ( 5), sets out the classification of vine varieties ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the classification of vine varieties should be substantially altered for a large number of administrative units, on the basis of experience and of studies concerning suitability for cultivation; . Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the Whereas the provisions of Regulation ( EEC) market in wine C1), as last amended by Regulation No 2005/70 have been amended several times since its ( EEC) No 3577/81 ( 2), and in particular Article 31 ( 4) thereof, adoption ; whereas the wording of the said Regulation has become difficult to understand because of the large number of amendments ; whereas account must be taken of the consolidation of Regulations ( EEC) No Whereas Article 31 of Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 816/70 ( 6) and ( EEC) No 1388/70 ( 7) in Regulations provides for the classification of vine varieties approved ( EEC) No 337/79 and ( EEC) No 347/79 ; whereas, in for cultivation in the Community ; whereas those vine view of this situation, Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/70 varieties
    [Show full text]
  • Air Y Rkshire
    AIRAIR YY RKSHIRERKSHIRE AviationAviation SocietySociety Volume 45 · Issue 2 February 2019 G-DRTCG-DRTC BoeingBoeing 737-808737-808 Jet2holidaysJet2holidays 1313 DecemberDecember 20182018 LeedsLeeds BradfordBradford AirportAirport RodRod HudsonHudson www.airyorkshire.org.uk Monthly meetings/presentations.... The Media Centre, Leeds Bradford Airport Sunday 3 March 2019 @ 2.30pm Roger Fozzard – We welcome back one of our own members, who on this occasion will be presenting his photographs taken on the TAS trip to Eastern USA and Canada in April 2018 7 April 2019 @ Barry Lloyd – “Wings for Sale” – Selling the 748, ATP and 146. Former BAE Aircraft 2.30pm Salesman. Barry has a story or two to tell! – In fact he has published a book “Wings For Sale” about his work as a key member of the BAE sales team working in far flung places around the world. Selling aeroplanes is fiercely competitive, working in an arena where there are triumphs disappointments, politics and many frustrations. Barry will recall some of his many adventures reflecting on the laughs, champagne and tears along a journey which started on our very doorstep at Woodford. Should be a great meeting and copies of “Wings for Sale” will also be available 7 May 2019 @ Steven Small – Brand Director, Routes Organisation. Steven will give us in insight into 7.00pm the ROUTES business which is focused entirely on aviation route development and the Changed to company's portfolio includes events, media and online businesses. Routes events are a TUESDAY source of breaking news in the aviation industry. Announcements about new air services are frequently made at the events, and the high profile discussions at the conference frequently hitthe headlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Music Market Access Report Canada
    CAAMA PRESENTS canada MARKET ACCESS GUIDE PREPARED BY PREPARED FOR Martin Melhuish Canadian Association for the Advancement of Music and the Arts The Canadian Landscape - Market Overview PAGE 03 01 Geography 03 Population 04 Cultural Diversity 04 Canadian Recorded Music Market PAGE 06 02 Canada’s Heritage 06 Canada’s Wide-Open Spaces 07 The 30 Per Cent Solution 08 Music Culture in Canadian Life 08 The Music of Canada’s First Nations 10 The Birth of the Recording Industry – Canada’s Role 10 LIST: SELECT RECORDING STUDIOS 14 The Indies Emerge 30 Interview: Stuart Johnston, President – CIMA 31 List: SELECT Indie Record Companies & Labels 33 List: Multinational Distributors 42 Canada’s Star System: Juno Canadian Music Hall of Fame Inductees 42 List: SELECT Canadian MUSIC Funding Agencies 43 Media: Radio & Television in Canada PAGE 47 03 List: SELECT Radio Stations IN KEY MARKETS 51 Internet Music Sites in Canada 66 State of the canadian industry 67 LIST: SELECT PUBLICITY & PROMOTION SERVICES 68 MUSIC RETAIL PAGE 73 04 List: SELECT RETAIL CHAIN STORES 74 Interview: Paul Tuch, Director, Nielsen Music Canada 84 2017 Billboard Top Canadian Albums Year-End Chart 86 Copyright and Music Publishing in Canada PAGE 87 05 The Collectors – A History 89 Interview: Vince Degiorgio, BOARD, MUSIC PUBLISHERS CANADA 92 List: SELECT Music Publishers / Rights Management Companies 94 List: Artist / Songwriter Showcases 96 List: Licensing, Lyrics 96 LIST: MUSIC SUPERVISORS / MUSIC CLEARANCE 97 INTERVIEW: ERIC BAPTISTE, SOCAN 98 List: Collection Societies, Performing
    [Show full text]
  • Native Grapes by Region
    NATIVE GRAPES BY REGION VALLE D’AOSTA Uva Rara Whites Vespolina Malvasia Istriana Reds Picolit Cornalin Whites Ribolla Gialla Fumin Moscato Bianco Tocai Friulano Mayolet Verdea Verduzzo Friulano Nebbiolo (Picotener) Vitovska Petit Rouge Prëmetta (Prié Rouge) TRENTINO-ALTO ADIGE Vuillermin Reds LIGURIA Whites Enantio Reds Moscato Bianco Lagrein Dolcetto (Ormeasco) Prié Marzemino Rossese Moscato Rosa Schiava family Whites PIEDMONT Teroldego Albarola Bosco Reds Whites Pigato Barbera Moscato Giallo Vermentino Brachetto Nosiola Croatina Dolcetto EMILIA-ROMAGNA Freisa VENETO Reds Grignolino Barbera Malvasia di Casorzo Reds Centesimino Malvasia di Schierano Casetta Lambrusco family Moscato Bianco Corvina Sangiovese Moscato Nero Corvinone Uva Longanesi Nebbiolo Croatina Pelaverga family Molinara Whites Ruché Raboso family Albana Uva Rara Rondinella Pignoletto Vespolina Whites Malvasia di Candia Aromatica Whites Durella Trebbiano Romagnolo Arneis Garganega Cortese Glera Erbaluce Marzemina Bianca TUSCANY Moscato Bianco Moscato family Reds Nascetta Verdicchio (Trebbiano di Aleatico Timorasso Soave) Canaiolo Nero Vermentino (Favorita) Verdiso Vespaiola Ciliegiolo Colorino family LOMBARDY Malvasia Nera family FRIULI VENEZIA GIULIA Sangiovese Reds Barbera Reds Whites Croatina Pignolo Ansonica Groppello family Refosco family Biancone Moscato di Scanzo Schioppettino Malvasia Bianca Lunga Nebbiolo (Chiavennasca) Tazzelenghe Moscato Bianco Trebbiano Toscano Whites BASILICATA Vernaccia di San Gimignano Montonico Bianco Reds Pecorino Aglianico UMBRIA Trebbiano
    [Show full text]
  • Atti Proceedings
    QUINTO CONGRESSO INTERNAZIONALE SULLA VITICOLTURA DI MONTAGNA E IN FORTE PENDENZA FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MOUNTAIN AND STEEP SLOPE VITICULTURE Conegliano (Treviso-Veneto) – Italia 29 marzo - 1 aprile 2017 " Le viticolture estreme: valori, bellezze, alleanze, fragilità" 1 "Extreme viticulture: values, beauties, alliances, vulnerabilities” ATTI PROCEEDINGS POSTER POSTER ISBN - 9788890233036 PATRONAGE: QUINTO CONGRESSO INTERNAZIONALE SULLA VITICOLTURA DI MONTAGNA E IN FORTE PENDENZA FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MOUNTAIN AND STEEP SLOPE VITICULTURE Sessione I Session I 2 Pratiche agronomiche e ambientamento climatico dei vitigni nella viticoltura di montagna Agronomic practices and varietal climate adaptation in mountain and steep slope vineyards PATRONAGE: Pre-harvest techniques to control ripening dynamic of Sauvignon blanc grapes cultivated in mountain area: first results Tononi M., Wenter A., Zanotelli D. and Andreotti C. Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Faculty of Science and Technology, P.zza Universitá 5, 39100 Bolzano-Bozen, Italy Abstract The effects induced by climatic changes have become more and more evident in wine regions located in mountain areas during the last years. The trend toward an increasing warming of the temperature is determining new ripening dynamics of grape berries that often lead to excessive sugar accumulation in fruits and alcohol development in wines. This fact somehow conflicts with the actual trend of wine markets that is increasingly asking for fresh, easy-to-drink, low alcohol wines. Moreover, other important quality traits of grapes and wines such as color, aroma, acidity and pH are detrimentally affected by ripening processes that occur largely during the hottest period of the season. Against this background, we aimed with this work to investigate the potentiality of different canopy management techniques to control and postpone the ripening process of Sauvignon blanc grapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Information Kit August ’19
    Press Information Kit August ’19 About Virgin Atlantic Since it was founded in 1984, Virgin Atlantic Airways has become one of the world’s leading airlines serving the world’s major cities. Virgin Atlantic is the quintessential Virgin story. It has every ingredient: the small newcomer taking on the giant and complacent establishment, the people’s champion introducing better service and lower costs for passengers with a reputation for quality and innovative product development. Virgin Atlantic was developed as an offshoot of Richard Branson’s Virgin Group, which was better known at the time in the world of pop and rock music. In early 1984, Branson was contacted by an Anglo-US lawyer called Randolph Fields with a proposal for involvement in a new airline. Recognising that, like the music business, aviation was a consumer led industry, and tired of the conveyor belt attitude to passengers, Branson decided it was time for Virgin to diversify. His fellow directors thought he was mad – particularly when he announced the new airline would begin operating in just over three months. On 22 June 1984 Virgin’s inaugural flight to Newark took place, a flight filled with friends, celebrities and the media. The airline’s aim was simple: “To provide the highest quality innovative service at excellent value for money for all classes of air travellers”. Hugely popular, Virgin Atlantic has won top business, consumer and trade awards from around the world. The airline has pioneered a range of innovations setting new standards of service. Despite Virgin Atlantic’s growth the service still remains customer driven with an emphasis on value for money, quality, fun and innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Case M1450J Proposed Acquisition of Flybe Group Plc and Its Trading
    Case M1450J Proposed acquisition of Flybe Group Plc and its trading subsidiaries, Flybe Ltd and Flybe.com Ltd by Connect Airways Ltd ______________ _____________ Decision Document No: CICRA 19/09 Date: 27 February 2019 Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority 2nd Floor Salisbury House, 1-9 Union Street, St Helier, Jersey, JE2 3RF Tel 01534 514990, Fax 01534 514991 Web: www.cicra.je 1 Summary 1. Connect Airways Ltd (Connect Airways ) proposes to acquire control of Flybe Group, including its subsidiaries, Flybe Ltd and Flybe.com Ltd ( Flybe ), which operates air routes into and from Jersey. 2. The transaction has been notified to the Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority ( JCRA ) for approval pursuant to Article 21 of the Competition (Jersey) Law 2005 (the 2005 Law ). 3. The JCRA has determined that the proposed acquisition will not lead to a substantial lessening of competition in any relevant market and hereby approves the notified transaction. The Notified Transaction 4. On 11 February 2019, the Channel Islands Competition and Regulatory Authorities 1 (CICRA ) received a joint application from Connect Airways’ shareholders for the proposed acquisition of the entire issued and to be issued share capital of Flybe, which will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Connect Airways. 5. CICRA registered the application on its website with a deadline for comments of 25 February 2019. One submission was received. The Parties 6. Flybe Group is a UK regional airline, incorporated in England and Wales with registered number 01373432. The shares of Flybe Group are listed on the London Stock Exchange. Flybe Ltd is incorporated in England and Wales, with registered number 02769768.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal of the European Communities 24
    No L 111/8 Official Journal of the European Communities 24 . 4 . 74 REGULATION (EEC) No 925/74 OF THE COMMISSION of 17 April 1974 making a fourth amendment to Regulation (EEC) No 2005/70 on the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN Whereas it is necessary to complete the classification COMMUNITIES, for Luxembourg by two varieties already appearing in the classification of the neighbouring French depart­ Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European ment and whose cultivating aptitude has been satis­ Economic Community ; factorily acknowledged : Having regard to the Council Regulation ( EEC ) Whereas the accession of the United Kingdom to the 816/70 ( 1 ) of 28 April 1970 laying down additional Community necessitates the completion of the provisions for the common organization of the market classification by the varieties whose cultivation is in wine as - last amended by the Regulation (EEC ) allowed in this Member State ; No 2592/73 (2 ) and in particular the second sub­ paragraph of paragraph 1 of Article 16 thereof; Whereas ( the opinion of the Wine Management Committee) Whereas the classification of vine varieties allowed for cultivation in the Community, as originally constituted, has been adopted by Regulation (EEC ) No 2005/70 ( 3 ) of 6 October 1970, as last amended HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION : by the Regulation ( EEC ) No 2244/72 ( 4 ); Whereas there are grounds to complete the classifi­ Article 1 cation for Germany by a variety for three Regierungs­ bezirke since the cultivation of this variety may be In the Annex of Regulation ( EEC ) No 2005/70, authorized following the completion of the examin­ title 1 , sub-title 1 , Chapter 1 ( Germany ) is modified ation of its cultivating aptitude ; as follows : Whereas from the acquired experience of several vine The vine variety 'Früher roter Malvasier' is added to varieties appearing under the list of ' authorized the list of vine varieties authorized for the Regie­ varieties' in the classification for certain French rungsbezirke Trier, Koblenz and Rheinhessen-Pfalz .
    [Show full text]
  • Elenco Codici Varietà Vitigni
    Via Adriatica Foro, 7 Eno Tecno Chimica 66024 FRANCAVILLA AL MARE (CH) Tel. 085-816903 – Fax. 085-816193 Laboratorio Enochimico Autorizzato MIPAF P..IVA.: 00339500696 Enologo Anselmo Paternoster e-mail. [email protected] http://www.enotecnochimica.it Elenco delle Varietà per la sezione - I - Vitigni ad Uve da Vino Codici delle varietà 1 ABBUOTO N. 55 CARRICANTE B. 2 AGLIANICO N. 56 CASTIGLIONE N. 3 AGLIANICONE N. 57 CATANESE NERO N. 4 ALBANA B. 58 CATARRATTO BIANCO COMUNE B. 5 ALBANELLO B. 59 CATARRATTO BIANCO LUCIDO B. 6 ALBARANZEULI BIANCO B. 60 CESANESE COMUNE N. 7 ALBARANZEULI NERO N. 61 CESANESE D'AFFILE N. 8 ALBAROLA B. 62 CILIEGIOLO N. 9 ALEATICO N. 63 CLAIRETTE B. 10 ALICANTE N. 64 COCOCCIOLA B. 11 ALICANTE BOUSCHET N. 65 CODA DI VOLPE BIANCA B. 12 ANCELLOTTA N. 66 COLOMBANA NERA N. 13 ANSONICA B. 67 COLORINO N. 14 ARNEIS B. 68 CORINTO NERO N. 15 ARVESINIADU B. 69 CORTESE B. 16 ASPRINIO BIANCO B. 70 CORVINA N. 17 AVANA’ N. 71 CROATINA N. 18 AVARENGO N. 72 DAMASCHINO B. 19 BARBERA N. 73 DOLCETTO N. 20 BARBERA BIANCA B. 74 DOLCIAME B. 21 BARBERA SARDA N. 75 DOUX D’HENRY N. 22 BARSAGLINA N. 76 DURASA N. 23 BELLONE B. 77 DURELLA B. 24 BERVEDINO B. 78 ERBALUCE B. 25 BIANCAME B. 79 FALANGHINA B. 26 BIANCHETTA GENOVESE B. 80 FAVORITA B. 27 BIANCHETTA TREVIGIANA B. 81 FIANO B. 28 BIANCO D’ALESSANO B. 82 FOGLIA TONDA N. 29 BIANCOLELLA B. 83 FORASTERA B. 30 BIANCONE B. 84 FORTANA N. 32 BOMBINO BIANCO B.
    [Show full text]
  • Officialjournal
    Official Journal of the European Communities Volume 17 No L 111 24 April 1974 English Edition Legislation Contents I Acts whose publication is obligatory Regulation (EEC) No 924/74 of the Commission of 10 April 1974 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1061/69 of 6 June 1969 specifying methods of analysis for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1059/69 1 Regulation (EEC) No 925/74 of the Commission of 17 April 1974 making a fourth amendment to Regulation (EEC) No 2005/70 on the classification of vine varieties 8 1 Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. 24 . 4 . 74 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 111 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) REGULATION (EEC) No 924/74 OF THE COMMISSION of 10 April 1974 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1061/69 of 6 June 1969 specifying methods of analysis for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1059/69 THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN Whereas, for practical reasons, it is necessary not COMMUNITIES , only to maintain the method of analysis mentioned above, but also to adopt a method which can give satisfaction in the above cases ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community ; "Whereas, in accordance with Article 4 ( 2 ) of Regu­ lation ( EEC) No 1059/69, the methods of analysis Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC ) No 97/ and other technical provisions
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal of the European Communities Wines Derived from Vine Varieties Appearing in the Recommended Or Authorised Vine V
    Official Journal of the European Communities 623 10.10.70 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 224/ 1 REGULATION ( EEC) No 2005/70 OF THE COMMISSION of 6 October 1970 on the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COM­ wines derived from vine varieties appearing in the MUNITIES , classification of vine varieties may be considered as table wines ; Having regard to the Treaty setting up the European Economic Community; Whereas strict application of Regulation ( EEC ) No 1388/70 would, in certain cases , lead to considerable Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC ) No difficulties, since the classification is intended to serve 816/701 of 28 April 1970 laying down additional as guidance for vine-planting ; whereas, therefore, provisions for the common organisation of the exceptions in respect of table grape varieties used by market in wine, as amended by Regulation ( EEC ) No the canning industry which are not subject to the 1253/70,2 and in particular the second subparagraph common quality standards applicable to table grapes of Article 16 ( 1 ) and Article 37 thereof ; should be allowed for a transitional period ; Whereas Article 16 ( 1 ) of Regulation ( EEC ) No Whereas the measures provided in this Regulation are 816/70 provides for a classification of vine varieties in accordance with the Opinion of the Management approved for cultivation in the Community ; whereas Committee for Wines ; those vine varieties should be classified, by administrative units or parts thereof, into HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION : recommended vine varieties, authorised vine varieties and provisionally authorised vine varieties ; Article 1 Whereas this classification of vine varieties should be adopted in the light of the provisions and criteria of The classification of vine varieties shall be as shown Council Regulation (EEC) No 1388/703 of 13 July, in the Annex to this Regulation .
    [Show full text]
  • Allegato 1 REGISTRO NAZIONALE DELLE VARIETÀ DI VITE
    Allegato 1 REGISTRO NAZIONALE DELLE VARIETÀ DI VITE (D.P.R. 24 dicembre 1969, n° 1164) SEZIONE I – vitigni ad uve da vino Codice Sinonimi riconosciuti della Denominazione varietà Annotazioni Varietà varietà 001 ABBUOTO N. 347 ABRUSCO N. 266 AGLIANICO DEL VULTURE N. 002 AGLIANICO N. GLIANICA, GLIANICO, ELLANICO, ELLENICO 003 AGLIANICONE N. 004 ALBANA B. 005 ALBANELLO B. 006 ALBARANZEULI BIANCO B. 007 ALBARANZEULI NERO N. 008 ALBAROLA B. (26) BIANCHETTA GENOVESE B. 267 ALBAROSSA N. 009 ALEATICO N. 011 ALICANTE BOUSCHET N. 010 ALICANTE N. (51)CANNONAU, * Ai soli fini della designazione dei vini DO e (236) TOCAI ROSSO N., IGT della Provincia di Perugia CANNONAO, GARNACHA TINTA, GRANACCIA, GRENACHE, GUARNACCIA, GAMAY* 315 ALIONZA B. 012 ANCELLOTTA N. LANCELLOTTA 013 ANSONICA B. INZOLIA , INSOLIA 014 ARNEIS B. 015 ARVESINIADU B. 016 ASPRINIO BIANCO B. 017 AVANA' N. 018 AVARENGO N. 020 BARBERA BIANCA B. 019 BARBERA N. 021 BARBERA SARDA N. 022 BARSAGLINA N. 373 BECUET N. 023 BELLONE B. CACCHIONE 024 BERVEDINO B. 025 BIANCAME B. (244) TREBBIANO TOSCANO B., BIANCHELLO 026 BIANCHETTA GENOVESE B. (8) ALBAROLA B. 027 BIANCHETTA TREVIGIANA B. 028 BIANCO D'ALESSANO B. 029 BIANCOLELLA B. JANCULILLO, JANCULELLA 030 BIANCONE B. 032 BOMBINO BIANCO B. OTTENESE, BOMBINO*, * Ai soli fini della designazione BONVINO* 033 BOMBINO NERO N. BOMBINO*, BONVINO* * Ai soli fini della designazione 3 Codice Sinonimi riconosciuti della Denominazione varietà Annotazioni Varietà varietà 034 BONAMICO N. 035 BONARDA N. UVA RARA * * Ai soli fini della designazione dei vini DO e IGT della Provincia di Novara 035 BONARDA N. UVA RARA * * Ai soli fini della designazione dei vini DO e IGT della Provincia di Novara 348 BONDA N.
    [Show full text]