AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP

PROJECT : DAKAR REGIONAL EXPRESS TRAIN (TER)

COUNTRY : SENEGAL

SUMMARY OF FULL RESETTLEMENT PLAN (FRP)

Project Team: A.I. MOHAMED, Principal Transport Economist, OITC1/SNFO M. A. WADE, Infrastructure Specialist, SNFO/OITC1 M.MBODJ, Consultant Economist, OITC 2 M. L.KINANE, Principal Environmentalist, ONEC.3 S. BAIOD, Consultant Environmentalist, ONEC.3

Project Team Sector Director : A. OUMAROU Regional Director : A. BERNOUSSI Acting Resident Representative : A. NSIHIMYUMUREMYI Division Manager : J.K. KABANGUKA

1 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Project Name : DAKAR REGIONAL EXPRESS TRAIN (TER) Country : SENEGAL Project Reference No. : P-SN-DC0-003 Department : OITC Division: OITC.1 ______INTRODUCTION This paper is the summary of the Full Resettlement Plan (FRP) designed in accordance with Senegalese national procedures as well as those of the Bank. It aims to ensure that project affected persons (PAPs) are compensated and settled. Its objectives are three-fold: (i) minimise involuntary resettlement as much as possible; (ii) avoid to the extent possible the destruction of assets; and (iii) compensate affected persons to offset the loss of residential and agricultural lands, buildings and equipment as well as loss of revenue. The Dakar-Diamniadio-AIBD (Blaise Diagne International Airport) Regional Express Train (TER) Project is composed of two phases. The first extends from Dakar to Diamniadio and the second from Diamniadio to Diass where the new Dakar internationnal airport is situated. This FRP concerns works that will be implemented during the project’s first phase and specifically works to be undertaken in the Districts of Dakar, Pikine and Rufisque. The FRP objectives are to: (i) inform on the authorities’ strong commitment to maximize the TER project’s positive spinoffs and implement social measures to compensate persons to be displaced and resettled; (ii) elicit wide social mobilization around the project (communities crossed, opinion leaders, grassroots organizations etc…); (iii) ensure transparency and a participatory approach to the rights-of-way clearance process; and (iv) clear the right of way within the required period to the total satisfaction of all stakeholders.

1. PROJECT SUMMARY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 1.1 Project Description Dakar’s current collective transport system comprises buses, mini-buses (cars rapides), taxis and the commuter train (Petit Train de Banlieue - PTB). As this system will not help to satisfactorily meet the transport needs of an estimated 124,000 commuters during the Dakar morning rush hours, the project selected by Government is to replace PTB with the future Regional Express Train (TER) to serve the greater Dakar suburban area possibly via an indirect omni-bus service. This project will be articulated with the Rapid-Transit Bus (BRT) project and other existing collective transport modes and/or projects. The goal is to help to rearrange and re-balance the urban space in the capital city Dakar with a view to achieving the GDP growth level defined in the Emerging Senegal Plan (PSE). The project will consist in modifying the current railway installations to be able, ultimately, to lay out four tracks: (i) a standard-gauge electrified double track (UIC) for passenger traffic, with datum speed of 160km/h, to replace the current PTB service; (ii) a metric track for goods transport; (iii) a reserve strip developed as maintenance/upkeep track to ultimately allow for constructing a 4th track. Furthermore, the project will: (i) renovate multi-modal train stations (at Dakar Plateau and Rufisque) and build a multi-modal station at Diamniadio; (ii) construct the Thiaroye and Bargny stations; (iii) construct eight stops at Colobane, Hann, Baux Maraîchers, Pikine, Yeumbeul, Keur-Massar, M’Bao and PNR; (iv) develop two maintenance sites – one at Colobane for trains and the other at Rufisque for infrastructure; and (v) procure bi-modal rolling stock (electric and diesel). The project components are presented in Table 1 below since Bank financing was solicited for the systems portion:

2 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Table 1 : Project Components N° Component Name Description A A - Studies The studies concern Phases 1 and 2 B. Development of the (i) Construction works of 36-km of 2 standard-gauge railway tracks; (ii) systems-installation works on 36 km; Dakar-Diamniadio (iii) a 38-km two-time shifting of existing metric gauge; (iv) construction/renovation works on 14 train stations ; B Railway Line (Phase (v) the procurement of bimodal rolling stock; (vi) environmental measures; (vii) sensitization on environmental 1) protection and safety; and (viii) works control and supervision. (i) development of 5 multi-purpose sports platforms at Hann, Pikine, Thiaroye, Rufisque and Diamniadio; (ii) development of canteens and commercial sheds at Colobane, Hann, Pikine, Thiaroye, Rufisque and C C. Related Works Diamniadio; (iii) support for youth and women’s associations in Colobane, Hann, Pikine, Thiaroye, Rufisque and Diamniadio; (iv) control and supervision of related works; and (v) final design studies and BDs of related works. D – Support for (i) support to train the youth in railway management professions; and (ii) support to Dakar Dem-Dik through D Operation and the procurement of buses for rapid service between the Diamniadio train station and AIBD and this, until Maintenance completion of Phase 2 of TER (i) supervision assistance other than works control and supervision under Component A; (ii) monitoring- E- Project E evaluation of the project’s socio-economic impacts; (iii) technical audit; (iv) accounts and financial audit; (v) Management equipment of the implementation unit; and (vi) operation of the implementation unit. F- Right-of-way F (i) Compensation of PAPs; and (ii) environmental and social monitoring Clearance The preliminary cost of Phase I of the project, including physical contingencies (for related works), and financial contingencies is estimated at UA 592.76 million, or CFAF 483,289.06 million 1.2 Project Location The project area (PA) for the TER’s entire Phase I alignment is located in the Dakar Region which comprises four districys, three of which – Dakar, Pikine and Rufisque – are crossed by Phase 1 of TER.

Land-use Map Legend Dakar-Diamniadio Road network Land Railway occupancy Railway Station Water Nat. trunk road Cultivated area Administrative borders Toll road Woodlands Industrial area

Thioroye station

Atlantic ocean

Rufisque station Colobane station

Dakar port

Figure 1: Project Location So, it is developed in eighteen (18) communes, namely: Dakar Plateau, Hann Bel-Air, Dalifort Foirail, Guinaw Rails South, Guinaw Rails North, Pikine East, Pikine West, Thiaroye Gare, Djirah Thiraoye, Yeumbeul South, Diamaguene Sicap Mbao, Mbao, Keur Massar, Rufisque West, Rufisque North, Rufisque East, Bargny, and Diamniadio. It covers an area of 802 km2, representing 0.41% of the total land area of Senegal. The project, in this Phase 1, is developed

3 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

on the PTB’s existing right of way up to Diamniadio, making a linear distance of 38 km out of a total of 57 km between Dakar and the Blaise Diagne International Airport (AIBD).

1.3 Socio-Economic Profile of the Project’s Direct Area of Influence The population density in the Dakar-Bargny portion of the alignment (about 33 km) is about 30,000 inhabitants/km². This applies to Diamaguene Sicap Mbao and Yeumbeul South Communes and others skirted or crossed by the railway’s right of way. In contrast, the second half of the rail section which concerns predominantly rural communes (Diamniadio, Diass and Keur Moussa) is sparsely populated, with densities of not up to 300 inhab/km². Although this section has less than 4 villages, the population need extensive land due to the stockbreeding and agricultural production methods used. Also, regardless of the project zone, people suffer from a need for mobility within and outside their community space attributable to the quality of roads (challenging feeder roads in rural areas and no access roads in some urban neighbourhoods…). The intervention zone is characterized by: (i) the presence of several unregulated illicit passage points created by the population for their movement; (ii) the presence of vehicles, mechanical workshops and makeshift houses; (iii) fish-smoking activities and houses in the Hann zone (Hann triangle); and (iv) an area of allocated lands in Bargny (between Pk 35 and Pk 39) and Diamniadio (Pk 40). Economic activities carried out on the entire project right of way are: (i) trading on the right of way - uplanned markets at railway stations (Thiaroye, Hann and Colobane) and on railway tracks (Guinaw Rails, Keur Mbaye Fall, Kamb, Dalifort, etc.); (ii) handicraft activities like carpentry and car-repair workshops; (iii) waste recycling (at Colobane Wakhinane and Hann Triangle), fish processing and smoking activities (in Hann); (iv) agricultural activities in the second railway section (Diamniadio-AIBD) subject of Phase 2, which will be affected by the loss of crops, orchards and farms especially at Toglou, Gandoul and some peripheral neighbourhoods of Diamniadio and Sebikhotane; and (v) also under Phase 2 of the project, pastoral activities affected by the loss of pastureland and the limited, even impossible access in some cases, to certain pastures due to the barrier effect of the fenced-off TER right of way. Population and Household Size In 2013, the three districts crossed by TER in its 1st phase had a total of 1,415,620 men and 1,391,910 women. Of these numbers, 41.3% of men and 40.9% of women lived in the 17 projet- area communes. The 18-to-35-year-old age-bracket formed the largest population segment overall in the project area followed by the 7-to-17-year-old age bracket (22.8%). Infants are also many since under-7-year olds make up 17.1% of the total population of the project area. For their part, adults aged between 36 and 59 years represent 19.8% while older persons account for only 5.2% of the total population therein. The communes that proportionally have the highest number of youths aged 17 years and below are Diamniadio (45.5%) and Keur Massar (42.8%). Therefore, the project area seems to comprise mainly families with infants (and this is corroborated by the aveage houshold size of 7 persons). Table 2 Average Total Overall Commune Male % Female % Households Household Population % Size Dakar Plateau 18,582 51.88% 17,233 48.12% 35,815 3.10% 7788 4.6 Hann Bel Air 34,658 50.20% 34,387 49.80% 69,045 5.98% 12,614 5.5 Dakar Project Area 53,240 50.77% 51,620 49.23% 104,860 9.09% 20,402 5.1 Dalifort Foirail 16,099 51.81% 14,976 48.19% 31,075 2.69% 5,579 5.6 Guinaw Rail South 21,269 52.07% 19,581 47.93% 40,850 3.54% 6,340 6.4 Guinaw Rail North 15,961 51.56% 14,994 48.44% 30,955 2.68% 4,282 7.2 Pikine West 26,431 49.81% 26,630 50.19% 53,061 4.60% 7,696 6.9

4 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Pikine Eest 16,698 50.48% 16,378 49.52% 33,076 2.87% 5,036 6.6 Thiaroye Gare 12,992 50.97% 12,498 49.03% 25,490 2.21% 3,851 6.6 Yeumbeul South 50,425 51.08% 48,299 48.92% 98,724 8.56% 12,442 7.9 Diamagueune Sicap Mbao 67,672 51.58% 63,519 48.42% 131,191 11.37% 18,301 7.2 Keur Massar 103,333 50.17% 102,638 49.83% 205,971 17.85% 27,158 7.6 Mbao 49,238 49.97% 49,305 50.03% 98,543 8.54% 14,585 6.8 Pikine Project Area 380,118 50.75% 368,818 49.25% 748,936 64.91% 105,270 7.1 Rufisque West 29,381 49.17% 30,369 50.83% 59,750 5.18% 8,346 7.2 Rufisque North 47,092 50.46% 46,240 49.54% 93,332 8.09% 11,993 7.8 Rufisque East 35,625 50.21% 35,324 49.79% 70,949 6.15% 8,681 8.2 Bargny 26,272 50.45% 25,802 49.55% 52,074 4.51% 6,110 8.5 Diamniadio 12,247 51.11% 11,715 48.89% 23,962 2.08% 3,119 7.7 Rufisque Project Area 150,617 50.19% 149,450 49.91% 300,067 26.01% 38,249 7.8 Total Project Area 583,975 50.61% 569,888 49.39% 1,153,863 100.00% 163,921 7 School Attendance Pre-school enrolment data indicates that girl and boy enrolment levels are very low in the project area. This situation is linked to the fact that most households in the study area lack the financial means to enrol their children in pre-school institutions, virtually all of which are private institutions. At the primary level, boy-enrolments largely exceed those of girls since boys represent 61.9% of enrolments compared to 38.1% for girls. Overall, enrolment rates are high, due among other things to the efforts of the public authorities to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. These efforts were reflected in the construction of school infrastructure and the massive recruitment of teachers. It is noteworthy that the predominance of boys’ enrolment rate is perceptible at the level of the other education cycles (middle school, secondary school, university). At the secondary level, boy enrolments are more than double those of girls. Professional Occupations of Women and Men The 10.8% employment rate in the project area is far below that of women in Dakar region (30.1%). This situation is attributable to the fact that several families have under-age children or because women have difficulties finding work. The number of housewives corroborates the fact that women care for children at home. Furthermore, a large proportion of women are students. The employment rate of women is proportionally higher in the Dakar Plateau, Hann Bel Air and Dalifort Foirail communes, with percentages of 28.3%, 27.3% and 27.5%, respectively. The Diamniadio commune has the lowest rate (13.4%). Regarding the employment rate of men, the data shows that it far exceeds that of women, standing at 24.3%. In the project area, men in school come in second position in terms of representativeness, with 16.34%. It is noteworthy that the Bargny and Keur Massar Communes have the highest proportions of students (male and female) as opposed to Dakar Plateau Commune, which has the lowest proportion. Poverty Rate The TER alignment is situated in Dakar’s suburban communes which are inhabited by the most disadvantaged and poorest people in the Dakar Region; thus, unplanned neighbourhoods (shanty towns and shack) abound there. Disability The Dalifort Foirail, Thiaroye Gare, Bargny, Diamniadio and Rufisque East communes have the highest proportions of persons with a disability. The disability prevalence rate is 1.9% in the project area and that is below the prevalence rate in the Dakar region, which stands at about 5.9%.

5 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Housing There is a predominance of owners (44.6%) and tenants (38.7%) in all communes of the project area. The significant presence of tenants is attributable to the fact that several of the area’s inhabitants come from the interior of the country. Another factor justifying the presence of tenants is the unaffordability of housing, which makes suburbs a polarizing zone. The strong presence of tenants in the project area is mirrowed at the level of the Dakar region where a significant proportion of households are indeed tenants (46%). Close to one-third of the dwellings have a single room. As the average number of persons per household is about 7, one can assume that several people do share a room. With the high proportion of tenants, there tends to be less rooms per dwelling. Furthermore, brick houses are the main type of dwelling (88.6%) in the project area and it is also predominant at the regional level. As concerns flooring, the most commonly used materials are tiles, followed by cement. Carpets or polished wood are very infrequently used. This is observed in most project area communes. In Yeumbeul South, Guinaw Rail North, Guinaw Rail South, Rufisque North and Diamagueune Sicap Mbao, cement is the predominant method of flooring. Access to Water Taps remain the predominant source of water supply to households. Water is supplied prefereably from a tap situated inside the house or in the compound/allocated plot or from a public tap, in that descending order of preference. Access to ICTs Virtually, no household has a land telephone line but a vast majority them have a mobile telephone. In all communes, a significant percentage of households have a mobile telephone. The prevalence of cellular phones is attributable to its easy access and practicality in inter- personal communication. Fuel Used for Cooking Gas is the main fuel used by households for cooking, followed by coal. These two fuels are the two leading sources of energy for cooking in all the communes, but in varying degrees. This situation is consistent with the predominant use of gas for cooking in urban areas. Sanitation The main methods used to evacuate waste water in the project area are sceptic tanks/cesspools and a sewer network. There are wide disparities among communes in that regard, since some are not connected to a sewer network. Indeed, sewer networks are the dominant method of sanitation in the Dakar Plateau and Hann Bel Air communes, while sceptic tanks/cesspools are predominant in the Yeumbeul South and Keur Massar communes. Industrial Activities: There are many industrial units, particularly along the existing alignment. Some of them constitute significant risks that should be evaluated during hazard-assessment studies, specifically for Oil Libya facilities.

6 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Easements and Town Planning As a result of declining railway traffic, indiscipline by some residents of riparian communes and the disorderly and growing urbanization, the existing railway right-of-way has been infringed upon with the construction of inhabited houses thereon and the transformation of the railway area into a vast household refuse dump. This situation is most visible in the first part of the railway section (Dakar - Diamniadio). Many compounds will be destroyed, mostly in Hann, Colobane, Pikine East, Yeumbeul South and North and Rufisque. In contrast, in the second railway section from Bargny Commune, there are many authorized and maybe some unauthorized residential plots close to and sometimes inside the right of way of the TER. The position of these plot will be revisited in order to respond to security needs by instituting a 40-metre right-of-way. Cultural, Religious and Historical Heritage This environmental element will be affected by implementation of the project. There are cemetries near the right of way and these include: (i) the Bargny cemetry situated at the commune’s East entrance; and (ii) two cemetries in Toglou village (one still being used and another one that is closed but with its graves still in place) – the case of these two cemetries is very specific. Extending the right of way on these segments will not be authorized.

2. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES The first phase of the TER Project, which concerns the Dakar-Diamniadio section, requires the widening of the current railway right of way in order to add a double track and have reserve land for the development of a fourth track subsequently. This right of way is occupied by ‘business hubs’, traders and a few compounds, some of which have been there for many years. Lands lying along the current railway line are also well developed since people saw open spaces and thought they were ideal for building homes and business hubs. Lands within the new right of way are quite densely populated and as such, the impact of developments are also expected to be significant. Since environmental impacts are treated in the ESIA report, only those impacts concerning loss of goods and socio-economic activities are presented in the FRP. The project’s specificity is that it mainly follows the existing railway alignment. Therefore, the analysis of alternatives took into account the position of the existing tracks to limit the number of affected persons, particularly enterprises and industries whose operations would be difficult to relocate. The main measure taken to minimize the number of PAPs was to review the width of the right- of-way required for works implementation. A width of 75 metres was first considered but given the high number of anticipated displacements, APIX optimized the right of way, setting it at 23 metres in areas where major obstacles so required and at 50 metres where available space allowed. The general list of PAPs identified during the June 2016 census can be consulted at APIX, representing MITTD in its capacity as Delegated Contracting Authority. 2.1 Impacts in the Pre-Construction Phase The main negative impacts due to population resettlement can be summarized as the loss of: (i) compounds and buildings; (ii) temporary commercial or agricultural income; (iii) perennial crops and fruit trees; (iv) collective facilities; (v) population displacement to a new site; (vi) quality of life due to population displacement and resettlement. The project will directly impact the properties and income of 11,703 PAPs distributed as follows:

7 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

- resident households (landlords and tenants) : 3,248 - operational business hubs (owners and tenants) : 6,316 - operational formal enterprises: 32 - non-resident or non-operating owners: 1,902 - collective infrastructure and facilities : 61 - agricultural concerns/orchards: 144 Additionally, PAPs will suffer project-induced disturbances, regardless of whether their losses are partial or total. The social and/or professional environments of the physically displaced will be disturbed since they will have to relocate as best as they can. 2.2 Impact during the Works Phase The other major negative impacts on the human environment are linked to the presence of the worksite and works which will cause: (i) health hazards including a higher prevalence of STDs; (ii) an increase in the risk of accidents for the population and workers; (iii) the deterioration of living conditions (noise, dust etc.); and (iv) increase in women’s workload during displacement and resettlement. 2.3 Social Impact and Compensatory Measures a) As earlier mentioned, the first measure taken to minimize PAP numbers was to reduce the required right-of-way width from 75 metres to 23 metres in areas having major obstacles and 50 metres where the available space allows. b) Thus, persons who lose goods due to the project are compensated in the following manner: (i) For owners of buildings, land, houses and/or equipment, compensation will be based on the value of their property when new; (ii) For tenants of houses, through rehousing assistance ; (iii) For losses of revenue of traders; (iv) for agricultural exploiters, owners or tenants, through compensation for loss of crops suffered. c) To complement the replacement of losses sustained, other resettlement measures will enable eligible persons to be assisted during their displacement and during implementation of the resttlement plan. These are summarized in Table 5 as follows: Table 5 : Measures Taken Proposed Measures Objectives 1) At this stage Sensitization on how to manage compensation Secure funds and guarantee their use as planned Support/advice in reconstruction Ensure that standards are complied with Housing and land bank Facilitate the search for replacement housing and land Support for access to subsidized housing Improve conditions of low-income households Monitoring of children having to change school and facilitate Ensure that children do not lose a school year registration Monitoring of relocation progress Avoid that households should find themselves without a home Monitoring inflationary pressures and adjust compensation Guarantee access to equivalent housing and business places Provision for temporary IEC replacement services Guarantee the maintenance of essential services during the transition Support for IEC replacement (support for technical services) Ensure that temporary replacement services do not become permanent Psychological follow-up of rehoused PAPs and people in revised Ensure that displaced persons and those who stay adapt to neighbourhoods their new environment Business sites and land bank Facilitate the search for new business sites Identify and invest in communes crossed by TER to develop Maintain the maximum number of business places in existing markets and commercial sites communes where they operate already Monitor the resettlement of PAPs who derive the bulk of their Avoid empoverishing PAPs revenue from their business places

8 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Support for formalization Help business places wishing to formalize their activities to do so Offer basic training in management and technical training to Ensure that business places maintain or improve their level of business places that so desire revenue Specific support to agricultural PAPs to improve yields or Make good the lack of land in the zone diversify Monitoring of PAPs to encourage employees’ wage payment Avoid temporarily depriving PAPs’ employees of revenue Support for identification of promising projects in communes Ensure that revenue lost by communes will be replaced and in obtaining donor financing Personalized support to vulnerable persons depending on the Build their resilience to disturbances specific needs of each 2) Concerning Final Design (FD) studies, the guidelines and prescriptions are: Maintain or minimize the current right of way Ensure that it will still be possible to access residential houses close to the walls. Contribute to reducing flooding issues Minimize the rights of way of engineering structures which involve several displacements Consider resettlement in case the Rufisque maintenance site is chosen Optimize the location of pedestrian overpasses Identify isolated built structures in order to displace them Propose development options for unused zones on completion of works Opportunity to build broad consensus around the main resettlement stakes

3. ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY The TER Project’s contracting authority is the Senegalese Ministry of Infrastructure, Land Transport and Accessibilitys (MITTD). Since the National Agency of Investment Promotion and Major Works (APIX) ensures supervision as delegated contracting authority on behalf of the Senegalese State, it will implement the project. Its dedicated staff includes engineers, communication experts, sociologists and town planners. Within the APIX General Coordination of Major Works, the Directorate of the Environment and Rights of Way Clearance (DELE) is tasked, inter alia, with preparing and implementing the FRP. This Directorate works in synergy with the TER Project Directorate (DPTER). As the project executing agency, APIX can enlist the services of consultants, be they consulting firms or non-governmental organizations, to achieve its objectives. In the discharge of its daily duties, APIX benefits from the support and advice of other structures and bodies. The TER Project’s Steering Committee brings together several ministries and is repsonsible for the validation of technical options. Established by Order No. 2011-002943 repealing and replacing Order No. 2004-005619 of 21 March 2011, the Ad Hoc Committee supervises the clearance of rights of way of major State projects. Its tasks are to supervise operations relating to: (i) information and sensitization of the populations concerned; (ii) survey of additional expenses incurred and right-of-way occupants; (iii) evaluation of additional expenses incurred and handing of cheques issued by the delegated contracting authority as compensation to project affected persons who are holders of unofficial rights; (iv) the notification of injunctions to vacate premises and assistance to the administrative authorities for site clearance operations; and (v) survey of displaced persons and their resettlement on developed sites. The Ad Hoc Committee is supported in its mission by the Operational Group under the authority of the Regional Governor. The Commitee is chaired by the Minister for Interior or his/her representative and comprises several members from the Prime Minister’s Office, Ministries, Regional Governor’s Office and Technical Directorates, and the State Counsel. The secretariat of the ad hoc committee is managed by APIX.

9 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

4. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 4.1 Public Consultations The population of the project area was informed during the preliminary design and project- implementation phase. Similarly, during the preparation of the ESIA and FRP, they were informed at public meetings. APIX had organized an institutional workshop at King Fahd Hotel on 2 February 2016, chaired by the Secretary of State for Railways, in the presence of the Director General of APIX. This workshop was aimed at making available to administrative authorities and representatives of ministries useful information on the TER Project, especially with respect to project governance and technical components, the planned rights-of-way clearance schedule and the communication plan. The first series of consultations was organized by APIX between February and April 2016 in communes crossed by the TER. They were attended by 1,202 people in the Dakar district, 1,873 in Pikine and close to 500 in Rufisque. APIX, through its various directorates (DELE, DTER, DCOM), presented the adopted project approach consisting in establishing permanent consultation with the population around the project. Emphasis was placed on various stages especially the planting of pegs to demarcate the right of way and preparation of the Resettlement Action Plan. Grassroots community associations and organizations (OCB) were also met. The main concern for these organizations is to accompany the process and become involved as an interface between the project and the population. Some of them also expressed concern about the support measures to be put in place in order to physhologically take charge of project affected persons. The census per se was preceded by several information sessions and meetings with the administrative authorities, mayors and neighburhood delegates. On 18 April 2016, APIX organized a meeting with administrative authorities to discuss the conditions for conducting the survey. Launching meetings were held with neighbourhood delegates to conduct the survey. These meetings helped to inform the riparian population, also ensuring that the survey would work closely with neighbourhood officials. Lastly, the survey was an opportunity for PAPs to express their views and preferences, especially on compensations and resettlement and the living conditions of women to ensure greater well-being. A second series of consultative meetings in communes crossed by the TER sought to inform PAPs about the compensation principles considered during the FRP preparation, based on the types of assets and revenue lost. PAPs were also acquainted with ongoing survey activities in their commune and the envisaged complaints-management framework was shared with them. In all, 13 meetings were held between 26 May and 8 June 2016. A last meeting with Thiaroye market PAPs took place on 28 July 2016. Formal invitation letters were sent to PAPs with support from youths, neighbourhood delegates and municipal workers. In some zones, follow- up telephone messages (SMS) were sent to ascertain that PAPs had received the invitations. A total of 3,927 persons, including 1,140 women, participated in the meetings. After the approval of the Full Resettlement Plan by the Senegal Government and donors, the FRP file was submitted by the Contracting Authority to the municipal offices and commune headquarters concerned by the project. It will be disseminated by all means deemed useful by the Government and also published on the APIX website: http://investinsenegal.com. A summary will be published on the Bank website.

10 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

4.2 Communication Plan: This measure seeks to facilitate communication among stakeholders during the works period and to forge privileged relations between national committees and project affected persons. The main objective of the communication plan is to ensure the rightful claimants’ responsible participation in the FRP implementation and see to process ownership. It also involves instituting a consultative and collaborative process during the FRP implementation period in order to factor in the concerns of the population and assist them until their complete resettlement. An inclusive, participatory and dynamic approach will be necessary to bring on board all active synergies in a sustainable framework. Regular contact will be established with each affected person through the communication mechanism and means set up for that purpose. Table 3 below summarizes the main activities of the communication plan, specifying the targets, envisged means and responsible entities. Table 6 : Communication Plan Activities Targets Means Authorities in Charge Sharing of FRP contents and discussons Governor, prefets and sub-prefects, Monitoring, visits or dispatches APIX with stakeholders technical services concerned, Population and PAPs One-stop shop SF Communication plans of facilitating structures Neighbourhood offices Ensuring reliability of PAP lists Local community officials Posting of survey lists APIX emanating from the survey and Administrative authorities Meetings with municipalities and information on dates, period and venues neighbourhood delegates for posting of the lists, methods of Local officials Press release and radio programmes verification and correction of these lists Prospectus Information on access to RAP and lists Population and PAPs Radio announcements APIX Press releases of administrative authorities Information concerning scales, Administrative authorities and Institutional workshop APIX compensation process, resettlement technical services conditions, rights-of-way clearance Communal authorities Information and consultative meetings SF methods, schedules and contacts and sessions on RAP PAPs Use of picture-based prospectus in local languages Civil society Radio stations and other media Information on stages of the resettlement Communal authorities Meetings Administrative process and schedules authorities PAPs Radio stations and other media APIX Civil society One-stop shop SF Population Neighbourhood offices Information on elements constituting PAPs Individual and collective interviews SF PAP files Calls One-stop shops Neighbourhood offices Convening of PAPs, negotiations and PAPs Distribution of an explanatory local- Administrative agreement on compensation avoiding language document with pictures. authorities complaints as much as possible Civil society Calls, meetings and individual APIX interviews with PAPs to understand methods used to assess their assets. Neighbourhood delegates Information tours and visits. SF Formalization support caravan Sensitization of PAPs to open accounts PAPs Individual and collective meetings SF and manage their funds. Information on financial structures in the Civil society Presence of representatives of financial APIX area structures in one-stop shops Information on rehousing possibilities PAPs Individual and collective meetings SF (data bank) Handwritten and computerized lists APIX accessible in municipal offices, one-stop shops and neighbourhood offices

11 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Information on compensation payments PAP One-stop shops Administrative authorities Convening notices for withdrawal of APIX cheques Calls for verification of payment SF Notification displacement /clearance of PAP Press release Administrative rights of way (measures to take for the authorities displacement time frame to be complied Civil society APIX with) Neighbourhood delegates Population Effective population displacement and Administrative and local authorities Radio and press releases Administrative safe demolition of buildings for the authorities people Network managers Traditional communicators and town APIX criers Security services Visit of sites to verify that PAPs are SF informed PAPs Population Relocation of collective goods Steering committee responsible for Technical meetings APIX (particularly the transfer of schools) these structures and other persons in charge of the facilities PAPs Cultural support activities SF Technical services in charge Specific means for basic social facilities One-stop shops Neighbourhood offices Support for rehabilitation of economic PAPs in business hubs Meetings with specific groups APIX activities Colobane site Caravan on resettlement opportunities SF and discussions Thiaroye market Reporting and testimony on the process Linkage with techical and State services in charge of the sector activities concerned Deployment of complaints mechanism Governor, prefects, sub-prefects Individual or collective interviews APIX Mayors and neighbourhood delegates Media (radio, newspapers etc.) Administrative authorities Population and PAPs One-stop shops SF Neighbourhood offices Traditional communicators Cultural actors (drama, songs, dance, paintings and other art forms) Information about support measures and Administrative authorities and State Individual and collective intervews APIX support for vulnerable persons services Mayors and neighbourhood delegates Prospectus on support measures SF available Population and PAPs Linkage with technical and State services based on required support measures Civil society Linkage with NGOs and other organizations likely to provide support

5. INTEGRATION IN HOST COMMUNITIES PAPs were able to express their preferences in terms of compensation and resettlement. The three most affected PAP categories – households living in an impacted compound; owners and tenants operating a business and agricultural sector stakeholders – clearly indicated their preference for compensation in cash. The proportion of PAPs having chosen this option is 76% while in-kind compensation is the first choice of 10% of PAPs. Those who preferred in-kind compensation the most are PAPs in business hubs. Only a few household-head PAPs or business-hub PAPs opted for a combination of the two compensation methods but these were fewer than those who did not share their preferences. Agricultural PAPs liked to obtain land in replacement and equipment to be paid in cash. Although PAPs were generally compensated in

12 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

kind, they preferred to supervise the reconstruction of their homes or business places themselves. Thus, it was noted overall that PAPs prefer to have control over their compensation whether paid in cash, or by overseeing themselves the replacement of their lost goods. The few formal enterprises affected by the projet expressed similar preferences. At the level of resettlement preferences, most PAPs prefer remaining close to the place where they currently live or work, and if possible in the same neighbourhood or at least in the same commune. In the final analysis, the issue of integration in host communities does not arise since all PAPs are likely to be relocated in the same zone.

6. SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDIES 6.1 Identification of PAPs APIX conducted a survey and a complete inventory of plots to identify persons likely to be affected by the project and thus determine eligibility for compensation pursuant to the laws and practices in force in Senegal. This survey mainly identified the nature of plots, their status and typology as well as the buildings and trees found thereon and lastly the number of PAPs (individuals and/or corporate bodies). The latter were identified normally based on the right of occupancy and nature of expropriation by commune. Table 7 below presents the number of PAPs by commune/District. Table 7: Number of PAPs by Commune and Department PAP Categories Collective Non Communes Household Formal Infrastructure Residents/ Agricultural Business Total Heads Enterprises and Facilities Non Lands Hubs (IEC) Operators Dakar Plateau 1 2 0 0 0 2 5 Hann Bel Air 1,513 9 13 211 38 872 2,656 Total Dakar 1,514 11 13 211 38 874 2,661 Dalifort-Foirail 49 6 3 26 35 601 720 Guinaw Rail North 41 2 2 48 0 122 215 Guinaw Rail South 9 0 0 54 0 64 127 Pikine West 13 0 1 107 0 255 376 Pikine East 161 1 0 119 0 132 413 Thiraoye Gare 316 7 23 593 0 2,416 3,355 Yeumbeul South 475 1 4 219 1 254 954 Diamaguene Sicap Mbao 287 0 5 153 3 580 1028 Tivaouane Diacksao 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 Mbao 132 1 2 106 40 253 534 Keur Massar 0 0 0 62 0 0 62 Total Pikine 1,483 18 40 1,498 79 4,677 7,795 Rufisque West 46 1 0 18 3 277 345 Rufisque North 53 0 1 18 0 56 128 Rufisque East 127 1 5 59 12 273 477 Bargny 23 1 2 97 11 158 292 Diamniadio 2 0 0 1 1 1 5 Total Rufisque 251 3 8 193 27 765 1 247 TOTAL 3,248 32 61 1,902 144 6,316 11,703 Table 8 below gives the status of the project’s direct impact on the riparian population by commune.

13 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Table 8: Aggregated Results of PAP Survey PAP Categories Non Collective Household Formal Residents/ Agricultural Business Infrastructure Total Ratio as % Department Heads Enterprises Non Lands Hubs and Facilities Operators Dakar 1,514 11 13 211 38 874 2,661 22.70% Rufisque 251 3 8 193 27 765 1,247 10.70% Pikine 1,483 18 40 1,498 79 4,677 7,795 66.60% Total 3,248 32 61 1,902 144 6,316 11,703 100% Ratio % 27.80% 0.30% 0.50% 16.30% 1.20% 54% 100%

7. LEGAL FRAMEWORK, DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AND APPEAL MECHANISMS 7.1. Land Tenure Regime and Senegalese Expropriation Regulations The Senegalese Constitution of 7 January 2001 (Article 15) guarantees the right to own property. The regulation governing land tenure in Senegal is founded on Act No. 64-46 of 17 June 1964 organizing the management of national lands. In Senegal, land is divided into three categories: (i) national land made up of all unregistered land not classified as public land and for which ownership is not recorded in the Mortgage Register; (ii) State land comprising public land and private land which belong to the State and over which it holds the property rights; (iii) individual land made up of land registered in the name of private individuals. The regulation governing expropriation in the public interest is based on Act No. 76.67 of 2 July 1976 and Implementing Decree No. 77.563 of 3 July 1997. Act No. 76-67 sets out an expropriation procedure whereby the State may, on the grounds of public interest and subject to a fair and prior compensation as provided for by the Constitution of 7 January 2001, force any person to cede to it the ownership of any privately owned property or real property right. This Act is the legal basis for resettlement and compensation procedures. The ordinary procedure for expropriation on the grounds of public interest consists of: (i) an administrative phase (investigation, declaration of public utility, declaration of transferability, reconciliation procedure) which, failing an amicable agreement, can lead to: (ii) a judicial phase during which the property transfer is pronounced by the judicial authority who at the same time defines the compensation amount. Despite the absence of a Population Displacement and Compensation Policy Framework, Senegal has mechanisms to help resettle populations, especially as concerns land restructuring and regularization. Compensation scales are regulated by: (i) Decree No. 2010-400 of 23 March 2010 instituting the scale of rents for occupying private State land; (ii) Decree No. 2010-439, repealing and replacing Decree No. 88-74 of 18 January 1988, setting the scale of rents for bare land and built-up land; (iii) Decree No. 2014-144 of 5 February 2014, as amended by Decree No. 81- 683 of 7 July 1981 and laying down the elements for calculating rents of residential premises.

7.2. AfDB Policy and Degree of Compliance Operational Safeguard OS2 – Involuntary Resettlement – concerns Bank-financed projects that cause the involuntary displacement of people. It concerns: (i) the relocation or loss of homes by the persons residing in the project area; (ii) the loss of assets (especially loss of structures and goods of cultural, spiritual and social significance) or involuntary restriction of access to assets including national parks, protected areas or natural resources; (iii) the loss of sources of income or means of livelihood as a result of the project, whether or not the affected persons are required to move.

14 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

The specific objectives of this operational safeguard are the following: (i) avoid as much as possible involuntary resettlement or minimize its impact when, after considering all project design alternatives, involuntary resettlement is inevitable; (ii) ensure that displaced persons are truly consulted and have possibilities of participating in the planning and implementation of the resettlement programmes; (iii) ensure that displaced persons receive substantial assistance to resettle under the project, such that their living standards, income-generating and production capacity and livelihoods improve beyond the pre-project levels; (iv) give borrowers clear guidelines on conditions to be fulfilled for involuntary resettlement in Bank operations so as to mitigate the negative impacts of displacement and resettlement, actively facilitate social development and establish a viable economy and society; and (v) establish a mechanism to monitor the performance of involuntary resettlement programmes in Bank operations and find solutions to problems as they occur so as to avoid ill-prepared and poorly implemented resettlement plans. The key points on which Bank policy requires going beyond national regulations are as follow: (i) priority to compensation in kind over compensation in cash, particularly in the case of land where the “land-for-land” replacement option should be prioritized, whenever possible; (ii) compensation at full replacement cost, where compensation in cash needs to be applied (fruit trees, crops, houses); (iii) assistance in restoring incomes and livelihoods (farming, fishing, stockbreeding, harvests handicrafts etc.); (iv) compensation for commercial and artisanal activities; (v) participation of affected persons in the entire resettlement process; (vi) support for vulnerable persons; (vii) socio-economic empowerment of women in the project area; and (viii) monitoring and evaluation, with support measures (training, technical support, discounted loans etc.). There is convergence on a number of points between the Senegalese legislation and the Bank’s Safeguard Policy. These points of convergence relate in particular to: (i) eligibility for compensation; (ii) eligibility date; and (iii) type of payment. There are also points of divergence, the most significant being: (i) monitoring and evaluation; (ii) economic rehabilitation; (iii) the resettlement costs to be paid by the expropriating party and the cost of moving of PAPs, where applicable; (iv) occupants without formal right ; (v) treatment of vulnerable groups; and (vi) alternative compensations. These points do not appear to be totally in conflict with Bank guidelines. Instead, they actually stem from the inadequacies of the Senegalese national legislation and as such, the Bank’s Safeguard Policy will prevail and its principles will be applied to the TER Project.

7.2. Out-of-Court Mechanism Although compensations are conducted exclusively in accordance with Senegalese legal and regulatory frameworks, the provisions of Bank guidelines allow for minimizing the number of complaints and appeals. In this case, the reconciliatory approach is applied since it preserves the rights of PAPs while ensuring sound management of the compensation budget. It should be noted that the Delegated Contracting Authority will foster and lend impetus to the establishment and operation of the District Committee in charge of Additional Expenses Identification and Assessment (CDREI), the Social Mediation Committee (CMS) and the National Ombudsman (already provided for in the domestic legislation). They should also bring together the representatives of Mayors, Prefects and local NGOs. The following mechanisms are proposed to resolve conflicts that might arise due to population displacements: (i) in case of amicable settlement, the legal period of 2 month will be granted to PAPs to move; (ii) any person feeling aggrieved by the valuation/compensation process can file a complaint that will be recorded in the complaints register at the level of facilitating structures (NGO) and brought before the

15 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

CDREI; (iii) in case of disagreement, the complaint is transmitted to the Social Mediation Committee that arbitrates land conflicts and is chaired by the Prefect; this appeal avenue (prior internal appeal) is highly encouraged and supported; (iv) if the complainant is not satisfied, he can refer the matter first to the Operations Group and next to the courts. Appeal before the courts is only possible if amicable settlement fails. However, this avenue is not recommended for the project since it can block and delay activities. This process is based on 3 mediation pillars, and is captured in the figure below. Figure : Complaints Management

CDRI Reception of the Complaint by CDRI or the Facilitating NGO

Recording of the Complaint

Review of the Admissibilty of the Complaint

Inadmissible Complaint Admissible Claim

Grounds for Rejection Consideration of solution by CDRI

Solution without a Solution with a Financial Impact Financial Impact

Case Transferred to APIX APIX Proposal to Complainant

Rejection of Proposal and Acceptance of Request to Transfer case Proposal to Higher Authority

Social Mediation CMS Commission (CMS)

Review and Decision by CMS

Rejection of Decision and Acceptance of Transfer of Case to Higher Solution by Authority Complainant

Transfer to Operations OPERATIONS GROUP Group (GO)

Review of Decision by GO

Rejection of Decision and Acceptance of Solution Transfer of Case to Higher by GO Authority

Closure of Case

National Ombudsperson

Litigation

16 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

8. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS The tasks enumerated below can change depending on DPTER-APIX’s commitment towards project affected persons. The scheduling and implementation of tasks take into account the timeframe for FRP implementation, which is entirely the responsibility of APIX in its capacity as delegated contracting authority under MTTD. Funds to finance plan-related expenses will come from the project budget, particularly Senegal’s counterpart contribution. It will be subject to external review at project completion, and this will help to ascertain that nobody loses his/her livelihood under the TER Project. Monitoring reports will confirm that compensations have been adequately paid. Table 9: Implementation Responsibilities and Institutional Arrangements

Activity Responsible Entities Executing Entities (Operationalization) Government of Senegal Ministry of Economy and Finance APIX in its capacity as delegated contracting Conduct of all FRP activities Ministry of Infrastructure, Land Transport and authority Accessibility APIX Determination of the Land Tenure Situation Ministry of Economy and Finance DGID (Cadastral surveys and land tenure) Preparation of Transfer Decree Ministry of Economy and Finance DGID (Cadastral survey and land tenure) Ad Hoc Committee APIX, Operations Group (GO), CDREI, Dissemination of the RAP APIX Communes Ad Hoc Committee Facilitating structures Supervision and Support for PAPs APIX APIX, GO and CDREI Ad Hoc Committee Preparation of PAP Files Facilitating structures APIX Signature of Agreements with PAPs Ad Hoc Committee Reconciliation Committee Ad Hoc Committee CDREI for PAPs without real rights Payment of PAPs Land revenue collector for PAPs with formal APIX title Verification that PAPs have been Actually APIX Facilitating structures Paid Notification of Right-of-way Clearance Ad Hoc Committee Operations Group and CDREI Notifications Enterprises, Operations Group, CDREI, Demolitions Ad Hoc Committee Facilitating structures and all other experts deemed useful Support to Vulnerable PAPs (accompanying APIX Facilitating structures, APIX them to the bank, etc.) Ad Hoc Committee Ad Hoc Committee Support Measures including Resettlement APIX Facilitating structures Support (administrative and financial support, Ad Hoc Committee APIX etc.) Ad Hoc Committee Complaints Management CDREI CDREI and Facilitating structures Resolution of Complaints APIX CDREI Implementation of Decisions APIX Entity concerned by the decision Stakeholder Information, Sensitization and Ad Hoc Committee APIX, GO, CDREI and facilitating structures Consultation (in particular PAPs) APIX APIX, facilitating structures and independent Monitoring and Evaluation APIX evaluator Pursuant to legal provisions governing expropriation, the main implementation stages of the complete plan for the resettlement of project affected persons will be: 1. Decree of Public Utility, 2. Institutional workshop, 3. Information, Sensitization of owners and occupants, 4. Decree of transferability, 5. Assessment (photo, observation, initial survey, deadline), 6. Preparation of resettlement action plan (RAP),

17 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

7. Review and optimization of the resettlement action plan (RAP), 8. Validation of RAP by the Ad Hoc Committee 9. Convening of the Reconciliation Committee, 10. Reconciliation + Agreement deed + drafting of Committee report, 11. Payment of Compensations + Notification of Displacement, 12. Right-of-way Clearance + release of the right of way, 13. Start of Dismantling and Demolitions. This build-and-design project has an intermediate stage consisting in optimizing the design during final design studies. The aim is, among other things, to optimize the required right of way and consequently reduce the impacts on the human environment. The process timeline will comply with the sequence (8) dedicated to FRP review and optimization, based on the final design studies, before (i) the resettlement of the expropriated persons; (ii) requisitioning of the right of way; (iii) FRP monitoring and implementation; and (iv) evaluation of FRP implementation.

9. ELIGIBILITY 9.1. Eligibility Criteria for Project Affected Persons Pursuant to the Bank’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy, displaced persons will be entitled to compensation and resettlement allowance for loss of land and other goods due to the project. These are persons who bear the direct economic and social consequences of the project stemming from the project components and relating to: - involuntary withdrawal of land resulting in: (i) relocation and/or loss of housing; (ii) loss of goods or access thereto; or (iii) loss of sources of income/livelihoods, whether or not the affected persons are moved to another site; and - involuntary restriction of access to areas legally defined as parks, and to protected areas, which negatively impacts the livelihoods of the displaced persons. PAPs who are thus entitled to compensation are normally categorized according to occupancy right, the nature and severity of the consequences suffered and their own vulnerability. - Those having formally recognized legal rights on land or other goods by virtue of the laws of the country. This category includes persons who physically reside at the project site and those who will be displaced or could lose access or livelihood due to project activities. - Those who do not have legal rights or recognizable claims on the land they occupy in the project impact area and who, although not belonging to any of the two categories described above, can prove by themselves or through other witnesses that they were occupying parts of the project impact area for at least 6 months before the deadline set by APIX. These categories are entitled to resettlement assistance in lieu of compensation for land to improve their previous living standards (compensation for loss of livelihood-related activities, common land resources, structures, crops etc.) 9.2 Eligibility Date The eligibility cut-off date corresponds to the end of the period of survey of affected persons, their built-up properties and their agricultural and commercial assets in the project area. The eligibility deadline was set at 30 June 2016 for phase I of the TER project. This date is included in survey database. However, it should be noted that on 30 June, identification was still pending for some PAPs which are private enterprises, public institutions or State agencies since their survey requires the delegated contracting authority to take additional steps. These are called

18 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

special status PAPs. Otherwise, beyond that date, occupancy and/or exploitation of the resource targeted by the project can no longer be eligible for compensation. Besides, it is recommended that survey data be updated, based on detailed studies, roughly two months before the displacement of the population. Updating the survey is important since rightful claimants can only be compensated for assets they held by 30 June 2016. PAPs should be able to continue to invest and enhance their assets without being penalized. The proposed approach aims to avoid economic stagnation in the area pending implementation of the project therein, while discouraging speculative migration of people, which is often observed in similar circunstances.

10. ASSESSMENT OF COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES 10.1 Assessment of Unit Costs Identification and estimation of compensation as well as other assistance and compensatory measures were treated in a participatory approach by the local authorities, project affected persons and APIX on behalf of MITTD. They reflected past experience with similar projects in the country such as the Highway Project. The scales for compensation are as follows: 10.1.1 Compensation for Loss of Land The project’s right of way will take up a land area estimated at 725,000 m2. The basic principle adopted in determining compensation in case of loss of land is to pay PAPs a sum equivalent to the market value of the land lost. Transactions made over the past months were analyzed via three sources of information that were consulted: (i) notarial studies of the project area; (ii) private real estate developers; and (iii) land-revenue-collection offices of the districts of Dakar, Pikine and Rufisque. Data collected from each of these sources are compared to the scales defined in Decree No. 2010-400 of 23 March 2010, which serves as a benchmark1. After analysing data from the three sources, it was concluded that data from land revenue offices in charge of registration presented a more representative sample compared to those obtained from notaries public and real estate developers. Consequently, the data that served as basis for determining compensation for loss of land in this RAP came from the land-revenue-collection offices of the districts of Dakar, Pikine and Rufisque. The project area is divided into six zones whose limits are summarized as follows: Area Name Area 1 Dakar Plateau From Dakar train station to Cyrnos roundabout 2 Hann From Cyrnos roundabout to Colobane bridge 3 Industrielle From Colobane bridge to Seven Up roundabout via Capa, Hann Ferrailles, Dalifort Foirail From Seven Up roundabout to Mbao and comprising the communes of Pikine East, Pikine West, 4 Pikine Pikine North, Diamagueune Sicap Mbao, Thiaroye, Guinaw Rails North, Guinaw Rail South, Keur Massar, Yeumbeul and Mbao 5 Rufisque Mbao to the SOCOCIM plant comprising the communes of Rufisque East, West and North Bargny and From SOCOCIM factory to the eand of the rail section 6 Diamniadio Thus, PAPs will incur land-transaction-related costs, either registration fees making up 15% of transfer charges or notary fees generally representing 4.5% of the transfer price. In the final analysis, the scales applied are presented in Table 10 below.

1 Decree No.2010-400 of 23 March 2010, setting the level of rents for occupation of private State lands, remains the Senegalese State’s official reference for land compensation. Nevertheless, the scales stipulated in this decree have not been updateed since its adoption.

19 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Table 10: Scales for Loss of Land Average Price, Leasing Scale Scale for Occupant Including Land Harmonization of Maximum, devoid of Real Title Deed (TD) Scales for TD CFAF/m2 (70% Decree No.2010, Area Name Rights - CFAF/m2 Charges, CFAL/m2 CFAF 439/m2 of TD) (40% of LC) CFAF/m2 1 Dakar Plateau 717,000 717,000 501,900 286,800 300,000 2 Hann 332,786 333,000 233,100 133,200 65,000 3 Industrielle 69,045 70,000 49,000 28,000 35,000 4 Pikine 47,795 48,000 33,600 19,200 40,000 5 Rufisque 26,449 27,000 18,900 10,800 10,000 6 Bargny and Diamniadio 7,043 10,0002 7,000 4,000 10,000 10.1.2 Compensation for Loss of Building The per-square-metre unit price (UP) of a building is presented for each category defined by Decree No. 2014-144 and the value is defined by Decree No. 2010-439. Each additional floor of a storey building represents 75% of the UP of the ground floor. Table 11: Scales for loss of buildings UP for Unit Price in Additional Category of Housing Category CFAF/m² Floor in CFAF/m² Luxury housing Category 1 153,000 114,750 Luxury housing of a functional design Category 2 142,000 106,500 Middle-market housing with modern amenities Category 3 135,000 101,250 Middle-market housing Category 4 118,000 88,500 Middle-market housing with economy-type finishing Category 5 89,000 66,750 Social-housing Category 6 66,000 49,500 Basic housing of the hut type Category 7 44,000 33,000

10.1.3 Compensation for Loss of Equipment The compensation levels were obtained from civil engineers and technicians working in the project area based on compensations already paid during other major works projects implemented in the area. Table 12: Scales for Loss of Equipment

Equipment Category Price in CFAF Unit of Measure Basin (including waste water) 50,000 Per unit Traditional wells 150,000 Per unit Modern wells 250,000 Per unit Private water tanks 500,000 Per unit Enclosure for animals 50,000 Per unit Farm huts 12,000 Per unit External toilet (latrine type) 250,000 Per unit Wooden and mat sheds for resting 15,000 Per unit Borehole (Diambar pump) 150,000 Per unit Standpipe 25,000 Per unit Cattle watering hole 50,000 Per unit Walless kitchen 375,000 Per unit Kitchen with walls 750,000 Per unit Adobe brick bread ovens 75,000 Per unit Granary 750,000 Per unit Pigeon pen 150,000 Per unit

2 The TER right of way is classified under the heading “other land” (Decree No. 2010-439)because it is neither in a business district nor in a residential area. The decree sets the value of these lands at CFAF 10,000 per m². In the RAP assumption and based on the methodology used, the scale finally adopted is CFAF 7,043 per m². Based to the RAP principles, the most advantageous price is applied for PAPs. Consequently, the rate of CFAF 10,000 per m² will be applied to compensate PAP landowners situated at Diamniadio

20 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Poultry house 150,000 Per unit Domestic store 750,000 Per unit Compost dump 50,000 Per unit External latrine-shower bloc 250,000 Per unit External latrine 250,000 Per unit External shower 250,000 Per unit Wooden and mat hut for resting (non residential) 15,000 Per unit Fence built using durable materials 15,000 Linear metre Barb wire fence 9,500 Linear metre Zinc fence 3,000 Linear metre Fence in grills 2,500 Linear metre Straw fence 800 Linear metre Hedge fence 400 Linear metre Paling fence 200 Linear metre 10.1.4 Compensation for Loss of Trees Concerning fruit production, the market prices of fruits are published in ANSD’s economic statistics bulletin of April 2016 and were used when available. However, for fruits whose prices are not published, agricultural and forestry specialists were consulted and the findings verified through a price survey in a number of markets in the project area. Table 13: Scales for Loss of Mature Fruit-bearing Trees (in production) Average Fruit Market Price for Market Price for Average Market Age when Species Production Unproductive Tree Productive Tree Price CFAF/kg Production Starts (kg/tree) Cashew tree 10 000 15 000 6,5 510 2 Avocado tree 5 000 10 000 20 1 298 5 Almendro 10 000 15 000 300 500 3 Banana plant 15 000 25 000 15 500 1 Cherry tree 15 000 25 000 200 200 2 Algerian cherry 8 000 15 000 100 500 3 Red cherry tree 15 000 25 000 200 250 3 Chestnut 5 000 7 000 50 1 000 2 Grafted lime tree 15 000 35 000 200 961 5 Ungrafted lime tree 11 000 16 000 125 150 5 Coconut tree 30 000 50 000 150 510 4 Sour sop 20 000 35 000 300 1 500 2 Date tree 40 000 75 000 60 715 7 Figue tree 15 000 25 000 100 300 3 Guava tree 24 000 35 000 32,5 400 2 Grenadier 15 000 25 000 900 1 000 2 Grafted jujube tree 30 000 50 000 50 796 1 Mandarine tree 30 000 40 000 150 1 098 4 Grafted mango tree 18 000 35 000 325 250 4 Ungrafted mango tree 12 000 25 000 350 62,5 4 Orange tree 13 000 20 000 175 395 4 Rhun palm tree 15 000 25 000 20 200 7 Pomelo 10 000 20 000 300 633 5 Pawpaw tree (dwarf) 15 000 25 000 475 1 048 1 Pawpaw tree (solo) 20 000 30 000 425 550 1 Poncannelle 8 000 15 000 80 1 000 2 Sapodila tree 15 000 35 000 700 550 3 Tamarind tree 5 000 10 000 30 525 7 Other species (a) 5 000 10 000 15 300 3 (a) Other species include species that could not be identified and those that are rare (custard apple, passion fruit, etc.) 10.1.5 Compensation for Loss of Revenue Scales for loss of agricultural revenue were obtained from agricultural specialists. ANSD’s economic statistical bulletin of April 2016 also served as reference.

21 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Table 14: Official Price List Average Yields Average Market Harvested Produce (kg/m2) Price CFAF Groundnuts 0.0925 437 Egg plant 3.2 303 Bitter egg plant 2.25 506 Beet root 1.15 600 Carrots 1.7 313 Catalpa (Nana) 2.5 7,000 Celery 2.5 6,000 Cabbage 3.25 334 Chinese cabbage 2.25 800 Cucumber 4.25 759 Squash 2.5 650 Okra 2.2 999 Green beans 0.08 429 Lettuce (salade) 2 487 Chinese laurel 2.5 10,000 Maize 1.25 212 Cassava 2.75 455 Millet (souna and sanio) 0.08 245 Mint leaves 2.5 7,000 Turnip 2 268 Niebe 0.85 753 Onion 2.1 323 Garden sorel 0.225 200 Parsley 2.5 200 Pepper 1.2 725 Sweet pepper 1.5 896 Irish potatoes 2.6 354 Radish 2 400 Rice 0.2 268 Sorghum 0.089 248 Tomatoes 2.2 410 Farmers, be they owners or tenants, are compensated for harvest losses. The number of harvests considered is two per year, except for cereals that are grown exclusively in the rainy season (sorghum, millet, maize, rice). Plans are underway to provide assistance for the preparation of new lands and the amount paid per hectare is CFAF 150,000. Commercial Revenue Loss of revenue by formal enterprises is compensated depending on the declared turnover, if such turnover can be demonstrated by financial statements. If an enterprise is not able to demonstrate its declared turnover, then the average monthly turnover of enterprises of the same sector of activity and of the same size, is used as the benchmark. In all, formal enterprises are paid compensation equivalent to 6 months of turnover. Table 15: Scales for Loss of Revenue

Number of Number of Average Average Monthly Average Monthly Observations Category Valid Monthly Group Revenue (< Group Revenue Above CFAF Observations Revenue median) (≥ median) 1,500,000 Agency and services 123 16 308,000 189,000 639,000 Cattle/livestock feed business 66 16 800,000 372,000 972,000 Sundry businesses 408 58 600,000 264,000 929,000 Foodstuff businesses 657 48 400,000 182,000 757,000 Household appliances and IT equipment 115 17 480,000 207,000 723,000 businesses Textiles, cosmetics and beauty accessory 559 97 600,000 263,000 969,000 businesses Construction 101 25 820,000 384,000 1,158,000 Foundry and ironworks 177 20 420,000 237,000 816,000

22 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

Cottage industry 406 19 300,000 156,000 616,000 Automobile-related trades 460 30 360,000 197,000 721,000 TOTAL 3,072 346 Note : Declared monthly incomes above CFAF 1,500,000 are excluded from the calculation of the average of the 2nd group of business hubs, since they exceed the average monthly income of very small formal enterprises In the case of informal-sector enterprises, PAPs are entitled to compensation equivalent to one month of income, based on the compensation principles. If a PAP refused to declare his/her income during the survey, he/she will receive the compensation reserved for low-income businesses, corresponding to the 1st Group. The PAP must demonstrate that its average monthly income was higher for the compensation to be revised. 10.1.1 Compensation for Loss of Rent All landlords who rent out a plot of land, house or business premises are entitled to compensation for loss of rent. This loss is estimated from the rent revenue declared by the lanlord during the survey or from the average rates of rent in the project area. In case of dispute on lost income, it is possible to validate the rent-related income from tenants since they declared during the survey the rents they pay. 10.1.2 Assistance to Vulnerable Persons for Moving-related Losses For PAPs who own a formal enterprise or a collective infrastructure or facility (IEC), the estimated lumpsum assistance stands at CFAF 1,500,000 per enterprise or IEC. This assistance seeks to cover costs linked to inventory, transfer of equipment and furniture, moving, administrative charges and other resettlement-related costs. For business-premise-related PAPs, whether or not they possess movable or immovable structures, the estimated lumpsum assistance is set at CFAF 150,000 per site. This assistance is aimed at defraying displacement and resettlement costs. Regarding housing, resident landlords and resident tenants are entitled to a displacement and resettlement assistance of CFAF 25,000 per room occupied. Further, they will be paid a resettlement-assistance allowance equivalent to six months of rent. The rents declared during the survey serve as the basis for calculation. If rents paid were not declared, then the average rent in the area will be used. For their part, housed PAPs will receive a lumpsum displacement and resettlement assistance if they occupied an entire compound by themselves. The envisaged assistance stands at CFAF 25,000 per room occupied. In contrast, if they are housed in a compound where one or several other households also live, it is the PAPs housing them that will receive the displacement and resettlement assistance for rooms occupied by the housed PAPs. Lastly, if PAPs having to vacate their place of residence have to do so faster than was agreed during reconciliation, the rehousing assistance described earlier is revised upwards and 2 additional months will be added to the compensation amount. Operation of the National Committee: The aim of this measure is to endow the committee with the wherewithal to conveniently and satisfactorily ensure close monitoring of the FRP implementation. Related Improvement Infrastructure Related project infrastructure are intended to improve the compensatory social measures adopted. They will include: (i) the development of 5 multi-purpose sports platforms in Hann, Pikine, Thiaroye, Rufisque and Diamniadio; (ii) the development of shops and other business premises in Colobane, Hann, Pikine, Thiaroye, Rufisque and Diamniadio; (iii) support to youth

23 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

and women’s associations in Colobane, Hann, Pikine, Thiaroye, Rufisque and Diamniadio; (iv) the control and supervision of related works; and (v) the final design studies and BDs of related works 10.2 Assessment of Compensation for Losses Bank policy on the improvement of PAPs’ living conditions will be implemented. For the physically displaced, improving living conditions should go beyond compensation and be considered as part of the support measures agreed with PAPs and their respective communities. The amount of compensation for loss of land, buildings, activities, trees etc is summarized in Table 16 below:

Table 16: Summary of Compensations Category of Compensations Type of Loss Loss Dakar Pikine Rufisque Total Compounds 3,417,965,000 699,792,441 990,810,200, 5,108,567,641 Agricultural plots of land 20,073,300 73,044,400 31,733,000 124,850,700 Land losses IEC + Institutional 2,838,358,800 472,567,900 88,407,000 3,399,333,700 Non resident or non-operating owners 427,637,000 522,485,801 322,593,000 1,272,715,801 Household heads 1,440,129,750 4,689,435,124 4,597,519,000 10,727,083,874 Loss of buildings Business places 1,855,603,055 2,040,523,948 808,934,051 4,705,061,054 and facilities Agricultural plots of land 13,132,600 12,790,000 996,600 26,919,200 IEC + Institutional 531,225,000 930,308,000 173,467,000 1,635,000,000 Non resident or non-operating owners 23,628,200 3,033,080,495 33,075,160 3,089,783,855 Household heads 24,840,900 93,383,300 263,428,850 381,653,050 Business places 13,199,300 56,263,200 1,187,500 70,650,000 Loss of trees Agricultural plots of land 324,311,110 417,838,490 93,182,750 835,332,350 IEC + Institutional 56,000 1,000,000 1,055,000 2,111,000 Non resident or non-operating owners 755,500 60,681,000 14,761,000 76,197,500 Loss of revenue Income from rents 108,373,500 109,649,250 17,599,200 235,621,950 Income of PAPS in business hubs 337,134,000 1,216,492,000 251,374,000 1,805,000,000 Income of agricultural-sector PAPs 29,901,642 91,322,536 47,588,133 168,812,311 Household heads residing in their properties 9,000,000 10,000,000 11,600,000 30,600,000 Disturbance- Tenant household heads 146,552,500 155,289,250 21,393,200 323,234,950 related losses Business hub owners and tenants 203,503,596 677,184,818 209,311,586 1,090,000,000 IEC + Institutional 12,000,000 13,000,000 12,000,000 37,000,000 Users of agricultural plots of land 184,500 300,000 366,150 850,650 Reserve for formal enterprises 110,000,000 400,000,000 30,000,000 540,000,000 Sub-total 11,887,565,253 15,776,431,952 8,022,382,380 35,686,379,585 Physical Contingencies (20%) 2,377,513,051 3,155,286,390 1,604,476,476 7,137,275,917 Sub-total Compensations 14,265,078,304 18,931,718,342 9,626,858,856 42,823,655,502

The total compensation amount stands at CFAF 42,823,655,502. The budget for support and RAP implementation stands at CFAF 4,282,365,550 corresponding to 10% of the total compensation amount. The total budget of close to CFAF 47,106,021,052 is included in the total project cost (CFAF 483,289.06 million) and represents 9.7% of it. 10.3 Payment Methods As part of this FRP, all payment files relating to compensation and expenditure are prepared by the competent committee and verified and paid by DPTER-APIX . Compensation cheques will be handed to the persons concerned by the competent committees after verification of the validity of the identification document. The person concerned will be issued a displacement notice and will undertake to vacate the premises within 10 weeks. The necessary resources for the implementation of the resettlement Plan will be paid into a special account and managed by APIX – the project’s Delegated Contracting Authority.

24 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

11. IDENTIFICATION OF RESETTLEMENT SITES As indicated in section 5, interviews with the Departmental Town Planning services of Dakar, Pikine and Rufisque show that land has become virtually unavailable except in Rufisque. With the results of these interviews, various avenues were explored to resettle PAPs heading households. The real-estate programmes underway in Dakar region were initiated by the State via two public and semi-public companies, SICAP and SN-HLM. The scarcity of agricultural land in the Dakar urban centre complicates the resettlement of agricultural PAPs. The FRP provides for a specific support programme for these PAPs. The only possibility imaginable would be to search for land in Rufisque district or Thies region for PAPs who would be interested to go there. In communes where available land was identified, sites that could host business hubs are mainly facilities that are envisaged but not yet built. The short-term intake capacity is limited to the commercial centre situated in Thiaroye Gare municipality which can still take in 4,000 businesses. The remaining shops can possibly absorb a part of the demand expressed by PAPs working in business hubs since their compensation will enable them to set up shop in a privately developed properties where sales prices range between CFAF 3,250,000 and 7,000,000. To help communes procure standard commercial facilities that can accommodate more businesses, including some PAPs, the support measure envisaged by FRP consists in helping local communities to secure financing to undertake further upward constructions or densification of existing markets. Lastly, for the specific case of large enterprises, the strategy is to integrate them into existing or envisaged industrial areas through the Diamniadio Urban Centres programmes.

12. HOUSING, INFRASTRUCTURE AND SOCIAL SERVICES PAPs that would be resettling themselves could be supported and integrated into various ongoing real-estate programmes in the Dakar region, particularly in the Rufisque district. These programmes are initiated by the State via two public and semi-public companies, namely SICAP and SN-HLM or more recently, the Caisse de Dépôts et de Consignation, a new operator in the sector. Under these ongoing real estate programmes, one could mention in particular: (i) on the case of SICAP, the Lac Rose programme on 70 hectares with 2,427 planned housing units, the Grand Mbao programme on 10 hectares, with 300 planned houses and serviced land; (ii) I the case of SN-HLM, the project to develop 5,000 serviced plots at Keur Massar, Rufisque (Tivaouane Peulh) or the project to construct houses at Ndiakhirat, which is at the study phase; and (iii) regarding the Caisse de Dépôts et de Consignation (CDC), a programme to build 4,445 housing units at Bambilor.

13. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION In compliance with the laws in force in Senegal, an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) study, complemented by an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP), must be prepared and validated before implementation so as to identify risks for any new resettlement site as well as related works not forming part of the project area in order to avoid jeopardizing the natural and human environment.

25 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

14. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The indicative FRP implementation schedule, including target dates, is proposed in the following figure. It indicates activities to be carried out and the dates corresponding to the works implementation schedule.

Schedule (in months)

Activities *M1 *M2 *M3 *M4 *M5 *M6 *M7 *M8 *M9 *M10 *M11 *M12 *M13 *M14 *M15 *M16 *M17 *M18 *M19 *M20 *M21 *M22 *M23 *M24 *M25

*1 Approval of the RAP

*2 Assessment of the Land Tenure Situation

*3 Preparation of the Transferabilty Decree

*4 Mobilization of Staff and Consultants

*5 Dissemination and Posting of the RAP

*6 Management of Claims

*7 Information and Consultation of PAPs and Stakeholders

*8 Training or Upgrading on the RAP

*9 Establishment of the RAP Files

*10 Support Measures - Legal and Financial Support

*11 Verification and Assessment of Losses and Subsequent Compensation

*12 Conciliation with the PAPs

*13 Support Measures - Relocation ands Resettlement Support

*14 Compensation Payments

*15 Monitoring of Payments

*16 Notification of Vacating of Rights-of-Way

*17 Vacating Rights-of-Way

*18 Support Measures - Support to Student Registration

*19 Demolition

*20 Support Measures - Support to the Resumption of Activities

*21 Support Measures - Transition Support

*22 Monitoring Activities *23 Evaluation of Results 15. MONITORING AND EVALUATION 15.1 Monitoring-Evaluation Objectives and Content Monitoring and evaluation are key components of resettlement actions, targeting the following objectives: i. monitoring of specific situations and difficulties arising during implementation and ensuring implementation compliance with the goals and methods defined in the AfDB Involuntary Resettlement Policy, in particular OS2, and in Senegalese regulations. It will be conducted in a participatory manner by all actors, the Socio-Economist of APIX, communal authorities and project supervisors, the population and affected communities; ii. assessment of the medium and long-term impacts on affected households, their livelihoods, incomes, economic conditions, the environment, local capacity, housing, emerging land speculation, state of the environment and hygiene etc.; iii. monitoring of vulnerable persons; iv. monitoring of technical aspects of resettlement-site-development works and acceptance of the technical components of resettlement actions; and v. monitoring of the processing of complaints and conflicts. In line with the stipulations of this document, monitoring aims to correct implementation methods in real time during project execution, while evaluation seeks to verify whether general policy objectives have been complied with and to draw lessons from the operation in order to modify strategies and implementation within a more long-term perspective. Monitoring will be internal, and evaluation external. Monitoring of the project’s resettlement policy will be an integral part of overall project monitoring. It will be conducted in a participatory manner by all the actors: APIX, municipal authorities, project supervisor, and affected population and communities. The project’s socio- economic impacts will be monitored throughout its duration.

26 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

15.2 Monitoring Indicators The following overall indicators will be used: - number of households and persons affected by project activities; - number of people physically expropriated by project works; - number of people compensated by the project ; and - total amount of compensations paid. Furthermore, socio-economic indicators will be designed and monitored for a PAP sample, for example the following: - average monetary income and total average income (with development of consumption by the producers themselves); - average distribution of the household expenses of expropriated owners; and - number of totally jobless people; The initial value of these indicators can be established from the socio-economic surveys included in the census update by the expropriation commission. Subsequently, it could be useful to update these surveys once every year, for example, using a sample of about 15 to 20% PAPs.

Vulnerable persons will be the target of special social monitoring. An annual monitoring report will be prepared by APIX. Internal monitoring reports, prepared by the latter, will help to present the progress of the operation, and to see whether compensations have been paid as planned in the FRP and used wisely to improve the living standards of those concerned. 15.3 FRP Evaluation An external evaluation of FRP implementation will be conducted for all PAPs. APIX will entrust the programme evaluation to an independent audit firm. This external audit will consist in checking whether FRP implementation was consistent with the stated objectives and the provisions of Senegalese legislation and Bank guidelines.

Specifically, monitoring-evaluation must make it possible to ensure that: (i) compensations defined beforehand have been paid; (ii) vulnerable groups are properly catered for; (iii) all complaints have been considered and the deliberations are known; (iv) the FRP implementation schedule is complied with; and (vi) resettlement does not create negative impacts or where they exist, that such impacts are under control. It involves especially ensuring that the living standard of PAPs does not drop.

Monitoring-evaluation will also consist in assessing various categories of project affected persons’ level of satisfaction with the compensation methods. For its part, impact assessment will consist in conducting a comparative analysis based on a baseline case study at project start- up and a situational study at mid-term and at project completion. The terms of reference of the external evaluation of FRP implementation will comprise in particular: a) organizing surveys by polling a cross-section of different categories of the affected population, indicating the number of dispute cases, the number of reconstitution of PAP activities and by these means, highlighting the degree of satisfaction and possible grievances; b) on these grounds and considering the general institutional and technical context of the operation, assessing the following points: (i) organizational arrangements put

27 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

in place ; (ii) adequacy of human and material resources for attaining the set objectives; (iii) consistency of the communication-consultation and internal monitoring arrangement with the socio-economic conditions of affected persons ; (iv) evaluation of the implementation of commitments taken; (v) adequacy of planned budgets and analysis of gaps; (vi) evaluation of the fairness of compensations, pending litigation and the risk incurred by the project due to these litigations; and (vii) evaluation of the level of reconstitution and pursuit of PAP activities. The following parametres can be considered:  On the payment of compensations: - full compensation must be paid to affected persons well before commencement of the expropriation procedure; - the compensation amount must be enough to replace the lost goods; and - compensation for affected buildings must be equivalent to the replacement cost of materials and labour based on construction prices in force and no deduction should be made for depreciation of buildings or for the value of materials that can be recycled;  concerning public consultation and knowledge of compensation policies: - affected persons should be fully informed and consulted on land acquisition and resettlement procedures; - APIX/DELE’s FRP focal points should participate in information meetings; and - the agency should assess affected persons’ knowledge of compensation policies and their rights;  level of satisfaction: - the affected person’s level of satisfaction with the various FRP aspects should be assessed and scored; - the conduct of the appeals procedure and rapidity of compensations should be assessed; and - the reconversion of activities will complete the FRP evaluation.

28 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan

REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL One People – One Goal –One Faith

DECREE No. 2015-298

Declaring the Dakar-Blaise Diagne International Airport (AIBD) Regional Express Train (TER) Project a public utility venture;

THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC

WHEREAS the Constitution; WHEREAS Act No. 64-46 of 17 June 1964 on the National Public Domain; WHEREAS Act No. 76-66 of 2 July 1976 Establishing the National; Public Domain Code; WHEREAS Act No. 76-67 of 2 July 1976 Governing Expropriation on Grounds of Public Utility and with a View to Conducting Other Land-related Operations for Public Interest; WHEREAS Act No. 2011-07 of 30 March 2011 on the Land Tenure Regime; WHEREAS Decree No. 64-573 of 30 July 1964 Implementing Act No. 64-46 of 17 June 1964 on the National Public Domain, particularly its Articles 29, 36 and the following; WHEREAS Decree No. 77-563 of 3 July 1977 Implementing Act No. 76-67 of 2 July 1976 Governing Expropriation on Grounds of Public Utility and with a View to Conducting Other Land-related Operations for Public Interest; WHEREAS Decree No. 2014-845 of 6 July 2014 on the Appointment of the Prime Minister; WHEREAS Decree No. 2014-849 of 6 July 2014 on the Composition of the Cabinet; WHEREAS Decree No. 2014-853 of 9 July 2014 on the Distribution between the Office of the President, the Office of the Prime Minister and the Ministries, of the State Services and the Services Entrusted with Inspecting Public Institutions, Public Corporations and Parastatals; WHEREAS at the request of the party concerned; WHEREAS the favourable opinion of the Public Domain Operations Control Commission during consultations it held at its premises on 13 January 2015;

UPON the report of the Minstry of the Economy, Finance and Planning;

HEREBY DECREES

ARTICLE ONE - the Dakar-Blaise Diagne International Airport (AIBD) Regional Express Train (TER) Project is declared a public utility venture.

ARTICLE 2: Requisite expropriations shall be conducted within a period of three (03) years in compliance with the provisions of Article 3 of Act No. 76-67 of 2 July 1976 Governing Expropriation on Grounds of Public Utility and with a View to Conducting Other Land-related Operations for Public Interest.

ARTICLE 3: The Minister of the Economy, Finance and Planning shall be responsible for implementing the present Decree which shall be published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Senegal.

Done in Dakar, on Five March of the Year Two Thousand and Fifteen (05 March 2015

By the President of the Republic Macky SALL

The Prime Minister

Mahammed Boun Abdallah DIONNE

29