DOCSLIB.ORG

Plan D'action De Reinstallation (Par)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plan D'action De Reinstallation (Par) REPUBLIQUE DU SENEGAL PRESIDENCE DE LA REPUBLIQUE PLAN D’ACTION DE REINSTALLATION (PAR) Elaboration d’un plan de restructuration des quartiers de Pikine-Sud traversés par l’autoroute Dakar-Diamniadio Rapport final INGESAHEL Septembre 2008 Direction générale : François LAURENT (urbaplan) et Mamadou SOME (ingesahel) PAR et enquête socioéconomique : Papa Ameth KEITA, Moustapha DIALLO, Ismaïla DIEME (ingesahel) et Bryn WINISTOERFER (urbaplan) Traitement statistique du PAR : Ibrahima SOW (ingesahel) Autres responsables sectoriels : Equipements de proximité : Jean-Marc ROSSIGNOL Eaux de ruissellement : Bécaye Sidy DIOP et Mbéguéré MBAYE (h20 engineering) Transports et mobilité : Martin STUCKI (transitec) Réseau viaire : Pape SY Pôle Waranka et Seven Up : Katleen VERCAUTEREN et Oliver REGAZZONI Régulation foncière : Alain DURAND-LASSERVE Infographie : Gianni SCIAMANNA (urbaplan), Saadou DIALLO, Souleymane DIARRA et Moustapha SENE (ingesahel) 0626-D-Rapport PAR 260808.doc-FL urbaplan-lausanne ingesahel-dakar h2o-dakar transitec-lausanne av. de montchoisi 21 13, rue de thiong / bp 6418 hann mariste lot m03 b / bp 26469 av des boveresses17 1006 lausanne suisse dakar sénégal dakar sénégal 1010 lausanne suisse t 021 619 90 90 f 021 619 90 99 t 821 89 12 f 821 89 12 t 832 00 81 t 021 652 55 55 f 021 652 32 22 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] INGESAHEL Direction générale : François LAURENT (urbaplan) et Mamadou SOME (ingesahel) PAR et enquête socioéconomique : Papa Ameth KEITA, Moustapha DIALLO, Ismaïla DIEME (ingesahel) et Bryn WINISTOERFER (urbaplan) Traitement statistique du PAR : Ibrahima SOW (ingesahel) Autres responsables sectoriels : Equipements de proximité : Jean-Marc ROSSIGNOL Eaux de ruissellement : Bécaye Sidy DIOP et Mbéguéré MBAYE (h20 engineering) Transports et mobilité : Martin STUCKI (transitec) Réseau viaire : Pape SY Pôle Waranka et Seven Up : Katleen VERCAUTEREN et Oliver REGAZZONI Régulation foncière : Alain DURAND-LASSERVE Infographie : Gianni SCIAMANNA (urbaplan), Saadou DIALLO, Souleymane DIARRA et Moustapha SENE (ingesahel) 0626-D-Rapport PAR 260808.doc-FL urbaplan-lausanne ingesahel-dakar h2o-dakar transitec-lausanne av. de montchoisi 21 13, rue de thiong / bp 6418 hann mariste lot m03 b / bp 26469 av des boveresses17 1006 lausanne suisse dakar sénégal dakar sénégal 1010 lausanne suisse t 021 619 90 90 f 021 619 90 99 t 821 89 12 f 821 89 12 t 832 00 81 t 021 652 55 55 f 021 652 32 22 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] SOMMAIRE SECTION A : PRESENTATION DU PROJET 1 1. Introduction 2 2. Investissements retenus dans le Programme de restructuration de PIS 5 SECTION B : ETUDE SOCIOECONOMIQUE 18 3. Caractéristiques générales 19 4. Caractéristiques spécifiques 23 SECTION C : CADRE LEGISLATIF ET REGLEMENTAIRE 29 5. Textes régissant le PAR 30 6. Concordance entre le cadre juridique national et les procédures de la Banque mondiale 32 SECTION D : PLAN DE COMPENSATION 33 7. Spécificités du PAR de Pikine irrégulier Sud 34 8. Zone de recasement retenue 36 9. Concessions impactées 37 10. Types d’indemnisation 39 11. Types de perte et mode de compensation 41 12. Perte de terre 42 13. Perte de bâtiments 49 14. Perte de logis 54 15. Perte de revenus pour propriétaires d’espaces loués 57 16. Perte temporaire de revenus 59 17. Cas particuliers 61 SECTION E : MISE EN ŒUVRE DU PLAN DE COMPENSATION 65 18. Procédures d’indemnisation 66 19. Montage institutionnel 70 20. Chronogramme de mise en œuvre 75 SECTION F : BUDGET 76 21. Budget pour la mise en œuvre du PAR 77 SECTION F : SUIVI-EVALUATION 80 22. Dispositif de Suivi et d’évaluation 81 ANNEXES 89 23. Annexe 1 : grille des coûts unitaires utilisés pour le calcul des impenses 90 24. Annexe 2 : Questionnaires utilisés dans le cadre du PAR 92 25. Annexe 3 : Mesures d’Information, de sensibilisation et d’organisation menées à PIS 93 26. Annexe 4 : méthodologie et moyens mobilisés pour estimer le montant des indemnisations 97 27. Annexe 5 : risques identifiés et recommandations 110 PAR de la restructuration de PIS : rapport final – août 2008 i LISTES DES TABLEAUX, PLANCHES ET PHOTOS Liste des tableaux : Tableau 1 : Nombre de concessions impactées selon le type d’infrastructures ................................................................37 Tableau 2 : Indemnisation pour perte de terre des concessions impactées mais « pouvant rester » .......................................44 Tableau 3 : Indemnisations en nature et indemnisation en espèces..........45 Tableau 4 : Nombre de propriétaires devant être réinstallés et taille initiale de la concession .....................................................46 Tableau 5 : Indemnisation versée en espèces pour perte de terre aux PAP quittant .....................................................................47 Tableau 6 : Coût de délivrance des TF et DS pour les propriétaires allant être expropriés..........................................................48 Tableau 7 : Indemnisation pour perte de bâtiments des concessions « restant sur place »...........................................................52 Tableau 8 : Evaluation des pertes de bâtiment pour les concessions « devant quitter ») .............................................................53 Tableau 9 : Indemnisation aux propriétaires pour perte de places d’affaire hors concession ....................................................53 Tableau 10 : Propriétaires de places d’affaire hors concession...................53 Tableau 11 : Indemnisation pour perte temporaire de logis des concessions « restant sur place ».........................................55 Tableau 12 : Perte de logis : ménages locataires des concessions « pouvant rester » ..............................................................55 Tableau 13 : Perte de logis pour les ménages locataires des concessions « devant partir » ................................................................56 Tableau 14 : Perte de revenus locatifs pour propriétaires d’espaces d’habitation (pouvant rester) ...............................................57 Tableau 15 : Perte de revenus locatifs pour propriétaires d’espaces d’habitation (devant partir) .................................................58 Tableau 16 : Perte de revenus locatifs pour propriétaires de place d’affaires (dans concession) ................................................58 Tableau 17 : Perte de revenus locatifs pour propriétaires de place d’affaires (hors concession).................................................58 Tableau 18 : Indemnisation à l'exploitant pour perte de revenus de places d’affaire dans concession (quittant et restant).............60 Tableau 19 : Indemnisation à l'exploitant pour perte de revenus de places d’affaire hors concession ..........................................60 Tableau 20 : Détail du budget nécessaire pour mettre en œuvre le PAR......79 PAR de la restructuration de PIS : rapport final – août 2008 ii Liste des planches : Planche 1 : Réseau viaire retenu.............................................................7 Planche 2 : Dispositif de mise hors eau .................................................10 Planche 3 : Pôle de Waranka................................................................13 Planche 4 : Pôle de Seven Up ..............................................................15 Planche 5 : Equipements de proximité ..................................................17 Planche 6 : Communes d’arrondissement et quartiers de PIS...................21 Planche 7 : Découpage de la zone de PIS en GIE ...................................94 Liste des figures : Figure 1 : Répartition des concessions impactées selon la nature de l’investissement.................................................................38 Figure 2 : Répartition des concessions selon l’ampleur de l’impact occasionné........................................................................38 Liste des photos : Photo 1 : Mise à jour du plan masse et vérification des limites de concessions.....................................................................102 Photo 2 : Attribution et marquage du numéro de la concession...........102 Photo 3 : Prise de la photo du propriétaire de la concession ...............102 Photo 4 : Coordination du travail des différentes équipes d’enquête ....103 Photo 5 : Correction et actualisation des plans masse des concessions.....................................................................103 Photo 6 : Vérification du contenu des questionnaires avant classement......................................................................103 Photo 7 : Remise des questionnaires complétés pour classement........104 Photo 8 : Permanence de Diaksao : propriétaires venant compléter leur questionnaire ............................................................104 Photo 9 : Permanence de Diaksao : propriétaire venant se faire photographier, car absente lors du passage des équipes.......104 PAR de la restructuration de PIS : rapport final – août 2008 iii SECTION A : PRESENTATION DU PROJET PAR de la restructuration de PIS : rapport final – août 2008 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Contexte du programme de restructuration de Pikine Irrégulier Sud Les Autorités sénégalaises ont décidé de réaliser une autoroute à péages entre Dakar et Diamnadio. Différents bailleurs de fonds ont donné leur accord pour accompagner le Gouvernement sénégalais dans la concrétisation de cette infrastructure de portée nationale. La réalisation de cette autoroute va nécessiter la libération d’une emprise
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Market-Oriented Urban Agricultural Production in Dakar
    CITY CASE STUDY DAKAR MARKET-ORIENTED URBAN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN DAKAR Alain Mbaye and Paule Moustier 1. Introduction Occupying the Sahelian area of the tropical zone in a wide coastal strip (500 km along the Atlantic Ocean), Senegal covers some 196,192 km2 of gently undulating land. The climate is subtropical, with two seasons: the dry season lasting 9 months, from September to July, and the wet season from July to September. The Senegalese GNP (Gross National Product) of $570 per capita is above average for sub-Saharan Africa ($490). However, the economy is fragile and natural resources are limited. Services represent 60% of the GNP, and the rest is divided among agriculture and industry (World Bank 1996). In 1995, the total population of Senegal rose above 8,300,000 inhabitants. The urbanisation rate stands at 40%. Dakar represents half of the urban population of the region, and more than 20% of the total population. The other main cities are much smaller (Thiès: pop. 231,000; Kaolack: pop. 200000; St. Louis: pop. 160,000). Table 1: Basic facts about Senegal and Dakar Senegal Dakar (Urban Community) Area 196,192 km2 550 km2 Population (1995) 8,300,000 1,940,000 Growth rate 2,9% 4% Source: DPS 1995. The choice of Dakar as Senegal’s capital was due to its strategic location for marine shipping and its vicinity to a fertile agricultural region, the Niayes, so called for its stretches of fertile soil (Niayes), between parallel sand dunes. Since colonial times, the development of infrastructure and economic activity has been concentrated in Dakar and its surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • Aménagement Urbain À Djiddah Thiaroye Kao (Sénégal) Développement Participatif De Systèmes D’Assainissement En Zone Irrégulière
    Aménagement urbain à Djiddah Thiaroye Kao (Sénégal) Développement participatif de systèmes d’assainissement en zone irrégulière Atelier Projet de territoire SUD Tobias Burckhardt & Hélène Gomis 13 juin 2016 Table des matières Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 1. Diagnostic ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Contexte géopolitique ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2. Enjeux sociaux ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Enjeux environnementaux .................................................................................................... 6 1.4. Enjeux économiques .............................................................................................................. 8 1.5. Enjeux sanitaires ................................................................................................................... 9 2. Scénario tendanciel ......................................................................................................... 10 3. Projet d'assainissement à Djiddah Thiaroye Kao ........................................................ 13 3.1. Justification .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the P-Median Problem in School Allocation
    American Journal of Operations Research, 2012, 2, 253-259 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2012.22030 Published Online June 2012 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ajor) Application of the p-Median Problem in School Allocation Fagueye Ndiaye, Babacar Mbaye Ndiaye, Idrissa Ly Laboratory of Mathematics of Decision and Numerical Analysis, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal Email: [email protected], [email protected] Received April 18, 2012; revised May 20, 2012; accepted May 31, 2012 ABSTRACT This paper focus on solving the problem of optimizing students’ orientation. After four years spent in secondary school, pupils take exams and are assigned to the high school. The main difficulty of Education Department Inspection (EDI) of Dakar lies in the allocation of pupils in the suburbs. In this paper we propose an allocation model using the p-median problem. The model takes into account the distance of the standards imposed by international organizations between pupil’s home and school. The p-median problem is a location-allocation problem that takes into account the average (total) distance between demand points (pupil’s home) and facility (pupil’s school). The p-median problem is used to determine the best location to place a limited number of schools. The model has been enhanced and applied to a wide range of school location problems in suburbs. After collecting necessary numerical data to each EDI, a formulation is presented and computational results are carried out. Keywords: Non-Convex Optimization; Location Models; School Allocation 1. Introduction that has been extensively studied. The reason for the in- terest in the p-median problem is that it has practical Every year, the Education Department Inspection (EDI) applications in a wide variety of planning problems: lo- of Dakar has difficulties for assigning pupils to high schools of the suburbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Dakar Regional Express Train (Ter)
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP PROJECT : DAKAR REGIONAL EXPRESS TRAIN (TER) COUNTRY : SENEGAL SUMMARY OF FULL RESETTLEMENT PLAN (FRP) Project Team: A.I. MOHAMED, Principal Transport Economist, OITC1/SNFO M. A. WADE, Infrastructure Specialist, SNFO/OITC1 M.MBODJ, Consultant Economist, OITC 2 M. L.KINANE, Principal Environmentalist, ONEC.3 S. BAIOD, Consultant Environmentalist, ONEC.3 Project Team Sector Director : A. OUMAROU Regional Director : A. BERNOUSSI Acting Resident Representative : A. NSIHIMYUMUREMYI Division Manager : J.K. KABANGUKA 1 Regional Express Train (TER) Dakar Summary of Full Resettlement Plan Project Name : DAKAR REGIONAL EXPRESS TRAIN (TER) Country : SENEGAL Project Reference No. : P-SN-DC0-003 Department : OITC Division: OITC.1 ___________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION This paper is the summary of the Full Resettlement Plan (FRP) designed in accordance with Senegalese national procedures as well as those of the Bank. It aims to ensure that project affected persons (PAPs) are compensated and settled. Its objectives are three-fold: (i) minimise involuntary resettlement as much as possible; (ii) avoid to the extent possible the destruction of assets; and (iii) compensate affected persons to offset the loss of residential and agricultural lands, buildings and equipment as well as loss of revenue. The Dakar-Diamniadio-AIBD (Blaise Diagne International Airport) Regional Express Train (TER) Project is composed of two phases. The first extends from Dakar to Diamniadio and the second from Diamniadio to Diass where the new Dakar internationnal airport is situated. This FRP concerns works that will be implemented during the project’s first phase and specifically works to be undertaken in the Districts of Dakar, Pikine and Rufisque.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 7(1), 667-676
    ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 7(1), 667-676 Journal Homepage: - www.journalijar.com Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8375 DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8375 RESEARCH ARTICLE THE THIAROYE AQUIFER IN SENEGAL: USABLE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES FOR DRINKING OR IRRIGATION?. Saïdou Ndao1,2, Papa Babacar Diop Thioune1,3, Alassane Ba1 and El Hadji Bamba Diaw1. 1. Laboratory of Sciences and Technology of Water and Environment (LaSTEE), Polytechnic School of Thies BPA 10 Thies, Senegal. 2. Université of Thies, Faculty of Science and Technology, City Malick Sy, BP 967, Thies, Senegal. 3. University of Thies, Higher Institute of Agricultural and Rural Training (ISFAR) PO Box 54, Bambey, Senegal. …………………………………………………………………………………………………….... Manuscript Info Abstract ……………………. ……………………………………………………………… Manuscript History The Thiaroye drillings provided for a long time the supply of drinking Received: 10 November 2018 water to the Dakar region. However, faced with the combined effects of Final Accepted: 12 December 2018 salted bevel advancement and groundwater pollution, state authorities Published: January 2019 were led to stop their functioning. This led to a drop in the production of drinking water on the one hand, and favored, on the other hand, the Key words:- Senegal, Thiaroye aquifer, nitrification, recurrence of floods due to the rise of the groundwater level, resulting water pollution, drinking, irrigation. in the birth of another form of pollution: nitrification of the waters of the Thiaroye aquifer. This phenomenon has many and varied causes mainly related to a lack of waterproofness of septic tanks, the presence of a big cattle enclosure and a cemetery in the area. Their direct communication with the flush sheet is not without consequences on the immediate environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Dakar Regional Express Train (Ter)
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP PROJECT : DAKAR REGIONAL EXPRESS TRAIN (TER) COUNTRY : SENEGAL SUMMARY OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT (SESA) Project Team: A. I. MOHAMED, Principal Transport Economist, OITC1/SNFO M. A. WADE, Infrastructure Specialist, SNFO/OITC1 M. MBODJ, Consulting Economist, OITC 2 M. L. KINANE, Principal Environmentalist, ONEC.3 S. BAIOD, Consultant Environmentalist, ONEC.3 Project Team Sector Director: A. OUMAROU Regional Director: A. BERNOUSSI Acting Resident Representative: A. NSIHIMYUMUREMYI Division Manager: J. K. KABANGUKA 1 Dakar Regional Express Train (TER) Summary of the Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment Project name : DAKAR REGIONAL EXPRESS TRAIN (TER) Country : SENEGAL Project code : P-SN-DC0-003 Department : OITC Division : OITC.1 1 Introduction This report is the summary of the Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) of the Dakar Regional Express Train Project. It is prepared in accordance with African Development Bank (AfDB) procedures and operational policies, through its Integrated Safeguards System (ISS) for Category 1 projects. The project description and rationale are first presented, followed by the legal and institutional framework in Senegal. A brief description of the main environmental conditions is presented and the railway project’s components are presented according to typology. This project summary, in its Phase 1, identifies the key issues relating to major impacts and the types of measures to mitigate them. It encompasses the Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) developed for this purpose. It defines the environmental assessment procedures to be followed by key project actors and partners in the various stages with regard to the Design/Implementation approach. The regulatory and organizational mitigation measures and actions to check, minimize, mitigate or offset the negative impacts are presented in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • FP021: Senegal Integrated Urban Flood Management Project
    FP021: Senegal Integrated Urban Flood Management Project Senegal | Agence Française de Developpement (AFD) | Decision B.14/17 27 September 2016 Contents Section A PROJECT / PROGRAMME SUMMARY Section B FINANCING / COST INFORMATION Section C DETAILED PROJECT / PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION Section D RATIONALE FOR GCF INVOLVEMENT Section E EXPECTED PERFORMANCE AGAINST INVESTMENT CRITERIA Section F APPRAISAL SUMMARY Section G RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT Section H RESULTS MONITORING AND REPORTING Section I ANNEXES Note to accredited entities on the use of the funding proposal template Sections A, B, D, E and H of the funding proposal require detailed inputs from the accredited entity. For all other sections, including the Appraisal Summary in section F, accredited entities have discretion in how they wish to present the information. Accredited entities can either directly incorporate information into this proposal, or provide summary information in the proposal with cross-reference to other project documents such as project appraisal document. The total number of pages for the funding proposal (excluding annexes) is expected not to exceed 50. Please submit the completed form to: [email protected] Please use the following name convention for the file name: “[FP]-[Agency Short Name]-[Date]-[Serial Number]” PROJECT / PROGRAMME SUMMARY GREEN CLIMATE FUND FUNDING PROPOSAL | PAGE 1 OF 47 A A.1. Brief Project Information A.1.1. Project title Senegal Integrated Urban Flood Management Project A.1.2. Project or programme Project A.1.3. Country(ies) / region Republic of Senegal A.1.4. National designated authority(ies) Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development A.1.5. Accredited entity Agence Française de Développement A.1.5.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastline Mobility of Goree Island (Senegal), from 1942 to 2011
    Marine Science 2017, 7(1): 1-9 DOI: 10.5923/j.ms.20170701.01 Coastline Mobility of Goree Island (Senegal), from 1942 to 2011 Bakhoum P. W.1,2,*, Ndour A.3, Niang I.3, Sambou B.1, Traore V. B.2,4, Diaw A. T.2, Sambou H.1,2, Ndiaye M. L.2 1Institute of Environmental Sciences, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal 2Geoinformation Laboratory, Polytechnic High School, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal 3Department of Geology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal 4Hydraulics Laboratory and Fluid Mechanics, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal Abstract This current study aims to quantify Goree island littoral evolution from 1942 to 2011 in the context of sea level rise. Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS), in ArcGIS software was used to extract shoreline positions based on satellites and aerials photography (1942, 1966 and 2011) and estimate historic rate of change. Rates of change statistics were calculated using End Point Rate (EPR) and Net Shoreline Movement (NMS). In this study, EPR was calculated by dividing NMS by elapsed time between earliest and latest measurements for each transect. Results obtained show that shoreline between 1942 and 1966 retreated (-4m) at an average rate of -0.16m /year, compared an average of -0.06m / year between 1966 and 2011. This dynamic can be interpreted as result of project to preserve and restore Goree island (1979-1981). Slave house, mosque of island, Mariama BA School, and historical museum are the most sector affected by erosion. Analysis of results showed that causes are more natural than anthropic.
    [Show full text]
  • Coping with Floods in Pikine, Senegal: an Exploration of Household Impacts and Prevention Efforts
    Article Coping with Floods in Pikine, Senegal: An Exploration of Household Impacts and Prevention Efforts Hilary Hungerford 1,* , Sarah L. Smiley 2 , Taylor Blair 3, Samantha Beutler 1, Noel Bowers 4 and Eddy Cadet 1 1 Department of Earth Science, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT 84058, USA; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (E.C.) 2 Department of Geography, Kent State University at Salem, Salem, OH 44460, USA; [email protected] 3 Global Change Ecology Program, University of Bayreuth, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany; [email protected] 4 Department of Geography, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 February 2019; Accepted: 15 May 2019; Published: 18 May 2019 Abstract: African cities are at increasing risk for disasters, including floods. Pikine, Senegal—located on the outskirts of the Dakar metropolitan region—has experienced regular floods since 2005 due to a rising water table, dense settlement, and inadequate drainage. The goal of this research was to assess household experiences of floods through in-depth qualitative interviews in one area of Pikine. A total of 44 households were interviewed on the economic and health impacts of flooding and their perceptions of flood mitigation strategies. Our research confirmed that floods create substantial economic and health burdens for families and that infrastructure projects have helped, but not solved, the flooding issues. Our research also had some unexpected findings, particularly relating to concerns over drinking water, land tenure and housing prices, and perception of government intervention. Keywords: flooding; flood impacts; vulnerability; coping; flood prevention; Dakar 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Senegal Mapping the Poor in Senegal : Technical Report
    REPUBLIQUE DU SENEGAL MINISTERE DE L’ECONOMIE, DES FINANCES ET DU PLAN AGENCE NATIONALE DE LA STATISTIQUE ET DE LA DEMOGRAPHIE (A.N.S.D.) SENEGAL MAPPING THE POOR IN SENEGAL : TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 MAPPING THE POOR IN SENEGAL: TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT VERSION 1. Introduction Senegal has been successful on many fronts such as social stability and democratic development; its record of economic growth and poverty reduction however has been one of mixed results. The recently completed poverty assessment in Senegal (World Bank, 2015b) shows that national poverty rates fell by 6.9 percentage points between 2001/02 and 2005/06, but subsequent progress diminished to a mere 1.6 percentage point decline between 2005/06 and 2011, from 55.2 percent in 2001 to 48.3 percent in 2005/06 to 46.7 percent in 2011. In addition, large regional disparities across the regions within Senegal exist with poverty rates decreasing from North to South (with the notable exception of Dakar). The spatial pattern of poverty in Senegal can be explained by factors such as the lack of market access and connectivity in the more isolated regions to the East and South. Inequality remains at a moderately low level on a national basis but about two-thirds of overall inequality in Senegal is due to within-region inequality and between-region inequality as a share of total inequality has been on the rise during the 2000s. As a Sahelian country, Senegal faces a critical constraint, inadequate and unreliable rainfall, which limits the opportunities in the rural economy where the majority of the population still lives to differing extents across the regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Diaw, Mor T. (UCAD Phd Student), the Relationship
    The relationship between on-site sanitation density and shallow groundwater quality: evidence from remote sensing and in situ observations in Dakar, Senegal Mor Talla Diaw, PhD Student Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Senegal www.afriwatsan.org funded with UK aid from the UK Government through the Royal Society – DFID Africa Capacity Building Initiative BACKGROUND TO THE RESEARCH Water management in Senegal is experiencing multiple issues : Degradation of water quality by on-site sanitation systems failure… JEUDI 12 AVRIL 2018 on-site sanitation (pit latrines, septic sewered sanitation systems serve a tanks) most widely system in low- minority of urban dwellers in most low- income cities of Africa income cities of Africa Planning or readjustment of improved supply sources & low cost on-site sanitation achieving UN SDG 6 of universal access to safe water and sanitation by 2030 in African cities relies upon on-site solutions OBJECTIVE AND METHODOLOGY OF OUR STUDY OBJECTIVE Evaluate the density of on-site sanitation facilities associated with faecal contamination of groundwater below WHO guidelines for safe water METHODOLOGY . City-scale mapping of on-site sanitation fafilities (i.e., septic tanks, pit latrines) . Sampling of shallow groundwater sources for faecal contaminants . Statistical modeling (Chi-squared tests, Spearman correlation ….) . Validation of statistical models . Implied outcomes 3 SHALLOW AQUIFER AND ON-SITE SANITATION AREA Built Built area: Malika Sanghalkm Wakhinane Nimzatt Ndiareme Limamoulaye Yeumbeul Nord Keur Massar
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Registration Request Number: RQ2019/1 Country: Senegal PROJECT: DAKAR REGIONAL EXPRESS TRAIN -PHASE 1: DAKAR-DIAMNIADIO SEGMENT, SENEGAL
    Date: 19 August 2019 Notice of Registration Request Number: RQ2019/1 Country: Senegal PROJECT: DAKAR REGIONAL EXPRESS TRAIN -PHASE 1: DAKAR-DIAMNIADIO SEGMENT, SENEGAL 1. On 09 June 2019, the Compliance Review and Mediation Unit (BCRM) received a Complaint relating to the aforementioned Regional Express Train (TER) Project. 2. The Complaint was submitted by two national NGOs, signed by Mr. Aly Sagne, on behalf of the Lumière Synergie Développement (LSD) and Mr. Ibrahima Cissé, for Collectif National Des Impacts’ du TER (the National Collectif) representing persons affected by the project (PAPs). 3. The Complainants alleged that the TER Project has affected more than 14,465 individuals because of the demolition of their properties to clear the right of way for the train route (about 36 km). Moreover, they claimed that since the start of the project, the National Collectif has used all the means at its disposal to bring to the attention of the National Agency for Promotion of Investment (APIX) - the project promoter – the Project’s inadequate public consultations and negative impacts on the PAPs due to its intended involuntary resettlement of these people. The Complainants are of the view that the TER Project violates the environmental and social safeguard policies of the donors of the Project including those of the African Development Bank (AfDB). 4. The Complainants request the recourse mechanisms of the lenders, namely the Independent Review Mechanism (IRM)) of the AfDB and the Complaint Mechanism of the French Agency for Development (FAD), to investigate the aforementioned complaints together with the project’s Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), which should be implemented by the APIX.
    [Show full text]