Traffic Impact Study

Proposed Mixed-Use Development at Main Street East and Nottinghill Drive, Cambridge, ON Traffic Impact Study

City of Cambridge

July 23, 2020

Prepared for:

Mr. Shankar Thurairajah 2370826 Ontario Inc. 1240 Main Street East Milton ON L9T 8M7.

Prepared by:

Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Revision Description Author Quality Check Independent Review 0A Draft B Channa Reddy 07-23-20 Brandon Orr 07-23-20

PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AT MAIN STREET EAST AND NOTTINGHILL DRIVE, CAMBRIDGE, ON TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

This document entitled Proposed Mixed-Use Development at Main Street East and Nottinghill Drive, Cambridge, ON Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Stantec Consulting Private Limited (“Stantec”) for the account of Mr. Shankar Thurairajah (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document.

Prepared by (signature) Bhargav Channa Reddy, M.Eng.

Reviewed by (signature) Brandon Orr, MCIP, RPP

PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AT MAIN STREET EAST AND NOTTINGHILL DRIVE, CAMBRIDGE, ON TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1.1 1.1 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ...... 1.1 1.2 SITE/DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION ...... 1.3

2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...... 2. 1 2.1 ROADS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL ...... 2. 1 2.2 TRANSIT ...... 2.2 2.3 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ...... 2.2 2.4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...... 2. 3

3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS ...... 3.1 3.1 HORIZON YEARS AND BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC ...... 3.1 3.1.1 Growth Rate ...... 3.1 3.1.2 Planned Roadway and Transit Improvements ...... 3.1 3.1.3 Intersection control ...... 3.1 3.2 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ...... 3.4 3.3 SITE TRIPS ...... 3.6 3.3.1 Trip Generation ...... 3.6 3.3.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment ...... 3.7 3.4 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ...... 3.11 3.5 PARKING REVIEW & TDM ...... 3.12 3.5.1 By-Law Requirements ...... 3.12 3.5.2 Mode Share & Car Ownership Comparison ...... 3.12 3.5.3 Transit and Active Transportation Mode Assessment ...... 3.14 3.5.4 Regional TDM Checklist and Parking Management Worksheet ...... 3.15 3.5.5 Parking Justification Summary ...... 3.15

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 4.1

i PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AT MAIN STREET EAST AND NOTTINGHILL DRIVE, CAMBRIDGE, ON TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Site Statistics ...... 1.3 Table 2 Transit Routes ...... 2.2 Table 3 Intersection Level of Service Delay Criteria ...... 3.4 Table 4 2022 Future Background | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis ...... 3.5 Table 5 2027 Future Background | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis ...... 3.5 Table 6 Site Trip Generation ...... 3.6 Table 7 Trip Distribution ...... 3.7 Table 8 2022 Future Total | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis ...... 3.11 Table 9 2027 Future Total | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis ...... 3.11 Table 10 Vehicle Parking Space Requirements ...... 3.12 Table 11 TTS Mode share data | Daily ...... 3.13 Table 12 TTS Car ownership data...... 3.14

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Study Area ...... 1.2 Figure 2 Site Plan ...... 1.4 Figure 3 Existing Road Network ...... 2.1 Figure 4 Existing Transit Network...... 2.3 Figure 5 Existing and Planned Cycling Network ...... 2.3 Figure 6 Base Year 2020 Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ...... 2.5 Figure 7 Base Year 2020 Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hou ...... 2.5 Figure 8 2022 Future Background Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ...... 3.2 Figure 9 2022 Future Background Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ...... 3.2 Figure 10 2027 Future Background Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ...... 3.3 Figure 11 2027 Future Background Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ...... 3.3 Figure 12 Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ...... 3.8 Figure 13 Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ...... 3.8 Figure 14 2022 Future Total Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ...... 3.9 Figure 15 2022 Future Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ...... 3.9 Figure 16 2027 Future Total Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ...... 3.10 Figure 17 2027 Future Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ...... 3.10 Figure 18 TTS Zone Map ...... 3.13

LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A PRE-STUDY CONFERENCE MEETING...... A.1 APPENDIX B SITE PLAN ...... B.1 APPENDIX C BUS SCHEDULES AND ROUTE MAPS ...... C.1 APPENDIX D TRAFFIC DATA ...... D.1 APPENDIX E SYNCHRO ANALYSIS OUTPUTS ...... E.1 APPENDIX F TDM CHECKLIST AND PARKING MANAGEMENT WORKSHEET ...... F.2

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Introduction July 23, 2020

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

This Study assesses the transportation impact of a proposed mixed-use residential development in the City of Cambridge. The proposed development is located at the southwest corner of the future intersection of Nottinghill drive and Main Street East, City of Cambridge, as shown in Figure 1.

The development consists of one residential tower with 12 stories and ground floor retail and another 10- storey residential tower. The development will feature a total of 367 dwelling units, 648 m2 of ground-floor retail, 443 total (25 surface and 418 underground) parking spaces, and a single direct access onto Nottinghill Drive.

Stantec attended a pre-study conference meeting on the 3rd of June 2020 with the Region of Waterloo and the City of Cambridge to review the scope and methodology of the study. The agreed upon pre-study conference form has been attached to Appendix A for reference.

The scope of the study is as follows:

• The study area comprises the proposed intersections of: . Site Access / Nottinghill Drive extension; and . Main Street and. / Nottinghill Drive extension. • Weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic are forecasted for the years of 2022 and 2027, which represent the anticipated full build-out and occupancy of the subject development, and five years following full build-out. • Transportation impacts and requirements are assessed related to background traffic forecasts and total traffic forecasts including the proposed development. This is because the development is proposed to be built upon a future road extension of Nottinghill Drive, which does not currently exist.

The following methodology is used to analyze traffic operations and recommend transportation improvements:

• Future peak hour background traffic is estimated for future horizon years based upon a 4% growth rate along Main Street and 1% percent per annum growth rate on other corridors. The background traffic forecast also includes additional traffic generated by the full build-out of nearby developments (if any); • Estimates of the expected net increase in future site traffic are generated for the proposed development using data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication, “Trip Generation, 10th Edition”; • The future background traffic is combined with the net increase in subject site traffic to determine the total traffic volumes for future horizon years. The future peak-hour intersection operations are analyzed for the future background and future total traffic conditions; and • All the above data is used to determine the net impact on operational performance as a result of the subject site traffic, and to provide recommendations for road and/or traffic control improvements (if any) to address the identified impacts.

1.1

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Introduction July 23, 2020

Figure 1 Study Area

1.2

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Introduction July 23, 2020

1.2 SITE/DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION

The proposed development consists of one mixed-use tower and one residential tower with a total GFA of 30,041.0 square meters. The development will feature a total of 367 dwelling units, ground-floor retail, underground parking spaces, and direct access onto the Notting Hill Dr Extension. 443 car parking spaces will be provided. Table 1 summarizes the proposed site statistics. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2 with a high-resolution version attached in Appendix B for reference. Vehicles can access the development site through the proposed driveway onto the Nottinghill Drive Extension.

Table 1 Site Statistics Land Use GFA Retail Units Residential M2 1BDR 2BDR Total Building A Retail 648.00 1 - - Residential 16098.00 0 121 80 201 Building B Residential 13295.00 0 100 66 166 Total 221 146 367

1.3

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Introduction July 23, 2020

Figure 2 Site Plan

1.4

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Existing Conditions July 23, 2020

2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS

2.1 ROADS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL

The characteristics of the roads and intersections within and around the Study Area limits are described below. Figure 3 illustrates the existing road conditions and lane configurations.

Main Street is a two-lane (one in each direction) arterial road under the jurisdiction of the Region of Waterloo and runs in the East-West direction. The roadway runs from the city limits in the East to the Grand River in the West. Within the study area the roadway has paved shoulders on both sides and a posted speed limit of 60km/hr.

Franklin Boulevard is a four-lane (two in each direction) arterial road under the jurisdiction of the Region of Waterloo and runs in the North-South direction. The roadway runs from Mayers Road in the South to Queen Street in the North. Within the study area the roadway has multi use paths on both sides and a posted speed limit of 60km/hr.

Green Gate Boulevard is a two-lane (one in each direction) collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Cambridge and runs in the East-West direction. The roadway runs from Nottinghill Drive in the East to Franklin Boulevard in the West. The roadway is restricted to truck access. Due to the absence of a posted speed limit, the statutory speed limit of 50km/hr is assumed for analysis.

Nottinghill Drive and Sparrow Avenue are local roads primary serving residential uses. Due to the absence of a posted speed limit on these roads, the statutory speed limit of 50km/hr is assumed for analysis.

2.1 PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Existing Conditions July 23, 2020

Figure 3 Existing Road Network

2.1

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Existing Conditions July 23, 2020

2.2 TRANSIT

The Site is served by Grand River Transit (GRT) connecting transit riders to locations in the City and to Cambridge Centre Station and Ainslie Terminal. The Ainslie Terminal is located approximately 3.5 kilometers west of the site. The GRT operates the following bus routes within and around the study area:

Table 2 Transit Routes

Route Stations 50 Dundas Cambridge Centre, Delta 54 Lisbon Pines Ainslie 59 Christopher Ainslie 53 Franklin Ainslie, Cambridge Centre 59D Cambridge Centre Ainslie

Figure 4 shows the transit routes within and around the study area. Separate route maps for each route are included in Appendix C for reference. 2.3 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

The proposed site has access to a good network of cycling and pedestrian facilities. Figure 5 displays the existing and planned cycling facilities within and adjacent to the study area. The east-west cycling facilities include the bike lanes on Maple Bush Drive, Paved shoulders on Main Street, and a trail connecting to Churchill Park. Multi Use paths on Dundas street, Franklin Boulevard, and shared routes on Elgin Street South provide North-South connections. The site is also surrounded by a dense network of sidewalks on both sides of roadways within the study area.

2.2

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Existing Conditions July 23, 2020

Figure 4 Existing Transit Network

Figure 5 Existing and Planned Cycling Network

2.3

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Existing Conditions July 23, 2020

2.4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Existing Traffic Counts where available were obtained from the Region of Waterloo. The counts consisted of eight-hour intersection turning movements collected between 2017 to 2019. Motor vehicular traffic as well as pedestrian crossings were available in 15-minute intervals with vehicles classified by type.

Stantec collected intersection turning movement counts (TMCs) at the intersections of Green Gate Boulevard / Nottinghill Drive and Green Gate Boulevard / Sparrow Avenue from Streetlight Data’s StreetLight InSight platform, due to the risk of traffic undercounting as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when the study was undertaken.

StreetLight Data is a transportation insights platform that uses anonymous telecom and mobile app-based location data to estimate turning movement counts, AADT, and Travel behavior. StreetLight’s data has been validated against public external sources including permanent sensors, household surveys, license plates, Bluetooth scanning, and Census data.

As the scope of the study only involved the proposed intersections of the Site Access / Nottinghill Drive and Nottinghill Drive / Main Street; operation analysis was not conducted for the existing conditions.

The existing traffic volumes within and around the study area were reviewed to understand the traffic patterns and redistribute traffic to the proposed Nottinghill Drive extension in the future background scenario.

The existing base year 2019 traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours are illustrated in Figure 6 and Figure 7. Traffic data is provided for reference in Appendix D.

2.3 PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Existing Conditions July 23, 2020

Figure 6 Base Year 2020 Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

Figure 7 Base Year 2020 Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hou

2.5

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS

3.1 HORIZON YEARS AND BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC

For the purpose of this study it was assumed that the subject development’s anticipated full occupancy year is 2022, therefore the horizon years considered for analysis of all Study Area intersections are 2022 and 2027, which represent full build-out and five years following the full build-out of the subject development. Planned roadway improvements are also reviewed in this section.

3.1.1 Growth Rate

Based on the discussion with the Region and the City a Growth rate of 4% per annum was used for Main Street and a nominal growth rate of 1% per annum was applied for all other roads. Additionally, it is assumed that any trip from planned developments around the study area would be captured within the applied growth rates used to forecast the future volumes.

3.1.2 Planned Roadway and Transit Improvements

Nottinghill Drive is proposed to be extended and connected to Main Street before the full build-out of the subject development. Traffic analysis within this study assumes the connection will involve a stop sign at the south approach of the intersection, with unimpeded East-West through movements along Main Street.

It is also noted that an environmental assessment (EA) study has been planned for Main Street with a potential consideration for road widening to four lanes. It is anticipated that this EA will commence some time in 2026.

As the extension of Nottinghill Drive would provide a more direct access to Main Street it is expected that a portion of the existing neighborhood traffic would use Nottinghill Drive to access Main Street. As a conservative approach, all trips along Green Gate Boulevard and Sparrow Avenue were distributed to use the Nottinghill Drive extension to exit the neighborhood.

Based on the review of background conditions and assumptions noted above, future background traffic volumes for the 2022 and 2027 horizon year during the weekday AM and PM peak hours are shown through Figure 8 to Figure 11.

3.1.3 Intersection control

Due to the relatively low volumes that are expected to use the Nottinghill drive extension in the future background and total scenarios a stop-controlled intersection was analyzed at intersection of Nottinghill Drive and Main street. Based on pre-consultation with the City of Cambridge and the Region of Waterloo it was anticipated that a signal warrant or a roundabout feasibility would be conducted if the stop control resulted in poor operations.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.1

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

Figure 8 2022 Future Background Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

Figure 9 2022 Future Background Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.2

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

Figure 10 2027 Future Background Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

Figure 11 2027 Future Background Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.3

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

3.2 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC OPERATIONS

The quality of intersection operations at signalized and unsignalized intersections is evaluated in terms of level of service (LOS) and volume to capacity (v/c) as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). LOS is evaluated on the basis of average control delay per vehicle and includes deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Capacity is evaluated in terms of ratio of demand flow to capacity with an at-capacity condition represented by a v/c ratio of 1.00 (i.e. volume demand equals capacity). For signalized intersections, LOS ranges from LOS A for 10 seconds or less average delay to LOS F for average delay greater than 80 seconds. For unsignalized intersections, the LOS ranges from LOS A for 10 seconds or less average delay to LOS F for average delay greater than 50 seconds. (See Table 3)

Table 3 Intersection Level of Service Delay Criteria

Level of Service (LOS) Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections A ≤10s ≤10s B >10s and ≤20s >10s and ≤15s C >20s and ≤35s >15s and ≤25s D >35s and ≤55s >25s and ≤35s E >35s and ≤80s >35s and ≤50s F >80s >50s

To assess the existing peak hour traffic conditions, a level of service analysis is undertaken for the Study Area intersections using TrafficWare Synchro 10 Software, which implements the methodology of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The key parameters used in the analysis include:

• The intersection of Main Street / Nottinghill Drive is assumed to be an unsignalized intersection with a stop control on the south approach and the existing roadway layout on Main Street with no dedicated turning lanes and no stop control for East-West movements. • Heavy vehicle percentages as derived from collected traffic count data. • A nominal peak hour factor (PHFs) of 0.92 was applied for the Study Area intersections. It is noted that this factor adjusts the hourly volumes to better represent conditions during the peak 15 minutes of intersection operations; and • Synchro default values for all other inputs.

The results of the analysis for the Future Background conditions are summarized in Table 4 and Table 5 and the Synchro analysis outputs are provided for reference in Appendix E.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.4

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

Table 4 2022 Future Background | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Movement LOS Delay v/c Q LOS Delay v/c Q A 0 0.00 0 107: Nottinghill Drive & EBL A 0 0.00 0 Site Access (Unsignalized - Stop) EBR A 0 0.00 0 A 0 0.00 0 A 1 0.02 0 108: Nottinghill Drive & WBL A 0 0.00 0 Main Street NBL B 13 0.05 1 C 16 0.01 0 (Unsignalized – Stop) NBR B 10 0.02 1 A 10 0.00 0 v/c equal to or greater than 0.85 for through and shared/through movements, 0.95 for exclusive turn movements, LOS E/F, and any queues that are longer than the storage length or block movements downstream are highlighted (if any); Delay in seconds and highlighted if they exceed the intersection cycle length; Queues are 95th percentile in metres.

Table 5 2027 Future Background | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Movement LOS Delay v/c Q LOS Delay v/c Q A 0 0.00 0 A 0 0.00 0 107: Nottinghill Drive & EBL Site Access (Unsignalized – Stop) EBR A 0 0.00 0 A 0 0.00 0 A 0 0.00 0 A 1 0.02 0 108: Nottinghill Drive & WBL Main Street NBL B 14 0.06 1 C 16 0.02 0 (Unsignalized – Stop) NBR B 10 0.02 1 A 10 0.00 0

As shown in the traffic operational analysis tables, the intersections operate at good levels of service and volume to capacity ratios under future background conditions. All movements are anticipated to operate within the thresholds outlined in the Region of Waterloo’s Traffic Impact Study Guidelines for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. All movements are anticipated to operate at a level of service C or better.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.5

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

3.3 SITE TRIPS

3.3.1 Trip Generation

The number of vehicular trips that are anticipated to be generated by the proposed development was estimated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication, “Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition”. Specifically, the weekday AM and PM peak hour of adjacent traffic rate was estimated using the trip generation rates for a “Multifamily Housing (High-Rise)” (ITE land-use code #222) for building A and “variety Store (ITE land-use code #814)” for the retail space and “Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)” (ITE land-use code #221) for building B. The site generated trips are summarized below in Table 6.

Table 6 Site Trip Generation AM Peak Hour Dev Land Use Unit AM AM AM Average Rate/ Fitted IN % Out % Total Entry Exit Multifamily Housing 222 201 T = 0.28(X) + 12.86 69 24% 76% 16 53 (High-Rise) Building A 814 Variety Store 6.98 3.18 22 57% 43% 13 9 Internal Trip Reductions 1% 0 0 Multifamily Housing Building B 221 166 0.36 60 26% 74% 16 44 (Mid-Rise) Total 151 45 106 PM Peak Hour Dev Land Use Unit PM PM PM Average Rate/ Fitted IN % Out % Total Entry Exit Multifamily Housing 222 201 T = 0.34(X) + 8.56 77 24% 76% 16 53 (High-Rise) Building A 814 Variety Store 6.98 6.84 48 52% 48% 25 23 Internal Trip Reductions 42% -11 -10 Multifamily Housing Building B 221 166 0.44 73 61% 39% 44 29 (Mid-Rise) Total 198 74 95

As the retail land use is planned to serve the residents an internal trip reduction was applied to the retail trips. Internal trip capture rates were obtained from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report - Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed-Use. A reduction of 1% during the AM peak hour and 42 % during the PM peak hour was applied to the retail trips.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.6

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

3.3.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment

The estimated trip distribution was calculated based on patterns observed in the existing traffic volumes. Total traffic entering and exiting the Study Area in the AM and PM Peak hours was used to determine the existing distribution. The trip distribution patterns have been summarized below in Table 7.

Table 7 Trip Distribution Inbound Outbound To/From Road AM PM AM PM North Main Street 81% 82% 76% 77% South Nottinghill Drive 2% 2% 1% 0% East Main Street 8% 6% 8% 7% West Main Street 9% 10% 15% 16%

The site traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 12 and Figure 13 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively.

The weekday AM and PM peak hour total traffic forecasts are the combination of the background and site traffic forecasts. The future total traffic volume forecasts for the 2022 and 2027 horizon year are illustrated in Figure 14 through Figure 17.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.7

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

Figure 12 Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

Figure 13 Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.8

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

Figure 14 2022 Future Total Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

Figure 15 2022 Future Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.9

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

Figure 16 2027 Future Total Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

Figure 17 2027 Future Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.10

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

3.4 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS

Future total traffic forecasts were analyzed using the same methodology, parameters and lane arrangements used in the analysis of future background traffic conditions. The results of the operational analysis for the 2022 and 2027 future total conditions are presented in Table 8 and Table 9, respectively. The Synchro analysis output is provided for reference in Appendix E.

The future total traffic conditions under both horizons (2022 and 2027) largely reflect similar operational conditions as observed under the future background traffic conditions, however, operations are slightly deteriorated as a result of the additional site trips. Overall, all movements within the Study Area network operate at good levels of service of C or better and within the available capacity. As a result of the good operations anticipated in future conditions no intersection improvements are required and thus no signal warrants or roundabout pre-screening was conducted. This is in alignment with the expectations set out during pre-consultation with reviewing agencies.

Table 8 2022 Future Total | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Movement LOS Delay v/c Q LOS Delay v/c Q A 9 0.12 3 A 10 0.12 3 107: Nottinghill Drive & EBL Site Access EBR A 9 0.00 0 A 0 0.00 0 (Unsignalized) NBL A 0 0.00 0 A 1 0.00 0 A 0 0.01 0 A 1 0.02 1 108: Nottinghill Drive & WBL Main Street NBL C 17 0.30 9 C 22 0.35 12 (Unsignalized) NBR B 10 0.03 1 B 10 0.01 0

v/c equal to or greater than 0.85 for through and shared/through movements, 0.95 for exclusive turn movements, LOS E/F, and any queues that are longer than the storage length or block movements downstream are highlighted (if any); Delay in seconds and highlighted if they exceed the intersection cycle length; Queues are 95th percentile in metres. Table 9 2027 Future Total | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Movement LOS Delay v/c Q LOS Delay v/c Q A 9 0.12 3 107: Nottinghill Drive & EBL A 10 0.12 3 Site Access EBR A 9 0.00 0 A 0 0.00 0 (Unsignalized) NBL A 0 0.00 0 A 1 0.00 0 A 0 0.01 0 108: Nottinghill Drive & WBL A 1 0.02 1 Main Street NBL C 17 0.31 10 C 24 0.37 13 (Unsignalized) NBR B 11 0.03 1 B 10 0.01 0

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.11

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

3.5 PARKING REVIEW & TDM

3.5.1 By-Law Requirements

This section reviews the parking supply for the proposed redevelopment and compares it to the parking requirements specified in the City of Cambridge Zoning By-law, as consolidated in 2012. This includes a review of both the residential and retail parking supply.

Based on a review of the City of Cambridge By-Law parking rates as derived from Section 2.2.1 for the following:

• Residential (d) – an apartment house, maisonette, mixed terrace or cluster attached duplexes;

• Commercial (3) – all other retail commercial establishments

Table 10 summarizes the required number of vehicle parking.

Table 10 Vehicle Parking Space Requirements

Car Parking Requirement No. of units Land Use 2 Proposed or GFA (m ) Ratio Required Spaces Difference Spaces Apartment Building 1.0 /Unit 367 367 Visitor Parking 0.25 / Unit 91.75 443 -32 (-7%) Retail 648 2.5 Per 100 m2 16.2 Total parking ~475.0

Per the by-law requirement, the proposed development requires a minimum of 475 parking spaces for residents and visitors. The proposed parking spaces on-site are a total of 443 split between 418 underground spots across 2 parking levels and an additional 25 surface parking spaces. The proposed reduction represents a reduction of 32 spaces from the zoning by-law requirements or a 7% reduction. For the parking supply on site, please refer to the concept plan in Appendix B.

3.5.2 Mode Share & Car Ownership Comparison

To gauge the sufficiency of the proposed vehicle parking supply, mode share and car ownership data was investigated within the vicinity of the study area as derived from the 20111 transportation tomorrow survey (TTS). The TTS Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) that the proposed development resides in is 7415. Beyond this zone, another one in proximity to the development (7411) with apartments buildings was also investigated to accurately capture the travel behavior of residents in apartment buildings since the

1 TTS data from 2011 and 2016 were analyzed. The 2016 data showed fewer total trips compared to 2011 despite a number of new developments within the zones. Hence only 2011 data was used for the analysis.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.12

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

proposed development zone has none currently. Error! Reference source not found. shows the TTS zones that were investigated.

Figure 18 TTS Zone Map

Table 11 summarizes the average mode share throughout the day of both TTS zones analyzed. The data shows that 6% of the households in zone 7415 (proposed development site) use transit as a mode of transportation, which aligns with the proposed reduction of 7% in parking supply. Additionally, about 14% of the residents in zone 7411 which has around 3 apartment buildings use transit.

Table 11 TTS Mode share data | Daily

Zone Mode Share Cars Walk Bike Transit other 7415 86% 0% 0% 6% 9%

7411 81% 0% 4% 14% 1%

Error! Reference source not found. summarizes the number of households by car ownership category in apartment buildings in Zone 7411. As Zone 7415 has no apartment buildings no data was captured. The average car ownership per household in apartments in zone 7411 is 0.72 per household. A rate of 0.72 would result in a parking requirement of 372 spaces if these rates are applied to the residential tenant requirements only. This would result in 71 fewer spaces than the 443 proposed, or a reduction of 15% from the zoning By-Law rates which aligns with mode share data for TTS zone 7411.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.13

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

Table 12 TTS Car ownership data

Number of Households (Apartments) with correspondent car ownership Zone 0 Cars 1 Car 2+ Cars Average per Household

7415 N/A no Apartment Buildings

7411 150 393 0 0.72 367 units x 0.72 = 264 367 units x 0.25 (visitor) = 92 Resulting Parking Supply: 648 m2 (Retail) / 100 m2 x 2.5 = 16 Total Supply = 372 3.5.3 Transit and Active Transportation Mode Assessment

The public transportation services operated by Grand River Transit (GRT) in the study area provide a reliable, cost effective alternative mode of travel through the comprehensive and continually growing transit network system.

The subject site is situated in a transit supportive neighborhood with the bus stops located less than 200m from the site and within comfortable walking distance. Additionally, future transit stops are planned to be located on Main Street, west of Nottinghill Drive (eastbound direction) and on Nottinghill Drive, north of Sparrow (southbound direction). The Route Services are illustrated in Appendix C. The route services in the immediate area are described below:

50 Dundas: The 50 Dundas bus route operates approximately every 30 minutes from Franklin/Green Gate and ending Cambridge Centre Station, generally in a north-south direction. Cambridge Centre Station in located in front of Cambridge Centre Mall and is a transit hub for local routes to ION rapid transit and GO transit buses. The 50 Dundas bus route provides service on weekdays, only. Accessible service and bike racks are provided on the route

53 Franklin: The 53 Franklin bus route operates approximately every 30 minutes from Ainslie Terminal to Cambridge Centre Station, generally in a north-south direction. Ainslie St. Transit Terminal is the main hub for local GRT bus services within the City of Cambridge and some intercity connections. It is also the southerly terminus for the adapted bus rapid transit service of Ion. The 53 Franklin bus route provides service on weekdays, only. Accessible service and bike racks are provided on the route

54 Lisbon Pines: The 54 Lisbon Pines bus route operates approximately every 30 minutes in a loop from the Ainslie Street Transit Terminal connecting communities of East Galt and Kinbridge-Christopher- Champlain. The 53 Franklin bus route provides service on all days. Accessible service and bike racks are provided on the route

63 Champlain: The 63 Champlain bus route operates approximately every 30 minutes in a loop from Ainslie Terminal. The bus service travels on major roads such as Franklin Boulevard, Elgin Street, Alison Avenue, Dundas Street, and Champlain Boulevard. The 63 Champlain bus route provides service on weekdays and Saturdays. Accessible service and bike racks are provided on the route

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.14

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

59 Christopher: The 59 Christopher bus route operates approximately every 30 minutes in a loop from Ainslie Terminal, generally in a north-south direction. The bus service travels as far north as Main Street and Harris Street and as far south as Christopher Drive and Myers Road. The 59 Christopher bus route provides service on weekdays and Saturdays. Accessible service and bike racks are provided on the route.

It is also noted that the Region of Waterloo ION light rail transit (LRT) system is expected to connect the Cities of Cambridge, Kitchener, and Waterloo. The Stage 2 ION preferred route replaces the bus rapid transit service between Fairview Park Mall and Ainslie Terminal with an LRT service. The LRT provides high frequency service, with planned service operation approximately every eight (8) minutes during peak hours and every 10-15 minutes outside of peak hours. The subject site is conveniently located close to the proposed Main street station (2.5Kms).

The easy access to existing transit facilities such as the Ainslie Terminal Station, Cambridge Centre Station and the future rapid transit site will encourage residents to use alternative and sustainable modes of transportation. Additionally, the site is located in a walkable and mixed-use area that allows for a higher proportion of walking or cycling modes of travel. The on-site retail land use and proximity to commercial land uses along Dundas Street would encourage more active trips.

3.5.4 Regional TDM Checklist and Parking Management Worksheet

The TDM checklist and parking management worksheet provided in the Region of Waterloo TIS guidelines were completed for the subject development. As the checklist and worksheet are not designed for residential properties multiple parameters were not applicable to the development.

The development received a score of 35 on a maximum of 65 categorizing as a TDM supportive development. Additionally, the parking management worksheet indicated a total parking reduction of 6 % from the applicable fields aligns with the proposed reduction of 32 spaces in parking supply. The completed checklist and worksheet are provided in Appendix F for reference.

3.5.5 Parking Justification Summary

Based on a comparison of the required and proposed parking supply, along with an investigation of local travel demand characteristics, an evaluation of TDM, and an evaluation of the regional parking management worksheet, the proposed parking supply is considered appropriate. This is based on the following considerations:

• The proposed parking supply represents a reduction of 32 spaces (-7%) compared to zoning by- law requirements.

• Existing AM peak period mode shares in the study area are between 6-14%.

• The average car own ship per housed in apartment buildings in the vicinity of the proposed development is 0.72 indicating a lower tenant demand for parking spaces in apartment buildings.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.15

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Future Conditions July 23, 2020

• Applying the derived car ownership rate for apartments buildings (0.72/unit) while leveraging the by-law rates for visitor and retail parking would result in a supply of 372 space which is 71 fewer spaces than proposed and a 15% reduction over required parking rates.

• The site is located in a transit supportive zone which is well served by existing surface transit. Six surface transit routes provide convenient and frequent transit service around the study area and connect to higher-order transit services in the vicinity of the proposed development.

• The site is located in a walkable and mixed-use area that allows for a higher proportion of transit, walking or cycling modes of travel.

• The presence of onsite retail use and the proximity to commercial land uses along Dundas St S and Franklin Blvd will encourage more trips by active modes.

On this basis, the future parking demand will be satisfied with the proposed parking spaces, considering, the site is located in a heavily transit supportive zone, with future light rail transit stations a convenient walking distance away and in close proximity to mixed and commercial land uses.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 3.16

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Conclusions and Recommendations July 23, 2020

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The conclusions of the Traffic Impact Study are as follows:

• Under future background conditions, all study area intersections are anticipated to operate withing acceptable levels of service and within capacity under the 2022 and 2027 horizon years.

• Under the future total conditions, all study area intersections and site accesses are anticipated to operate at good levels of service and volume-to-capacity ratios under the 2022 and 2027 horizon years. No queueing issues are anticipated.

• Due to anticipated good levels of service under future total conditions, there is no need for intersection improvements at Main Street / Nottinghill Drive and as a result no signal warrants or roundabout pre-screening were conducted. It is anticipated that once Nottinghill Drive is extended a stop sign at the south approach should suffice in accommodating the re-distributed neighbourhood traffic as well as the site-generated traffic.

• The proposed parking spaces represent a 7% reduction from the Zoning By-law requirements, but are anticipated to be sufficient to meet the parking demand and to be used as a measure to encourage residents to switch to active transportation modes such as transit and biking for which infrastructures are already established in the study area.

In conclusion, the road network does not require any improvements or mitigation measures to accommodate the proposed development. The road network will continue to perform at good levels of service at all intersections and movements.

ob \\ca0216-ppfss02\work_group\01605\active\161413635\6 deliverables\drft_rpt_161413635_tis_07232020.docx 4.1

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Appendix A PRE-STUDY CONFERENCE MEETING July 9, 2020

Appendix A PRE-STUDY CONFERENCE MEETING

A.1

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

APPENDIX A: PRE-STUDY CONFERENCE FORM

Item Description Details ISSUES 1 List any issues expected that Xo Covid-19 Pandemic is impacting ability to collect counts. may impact the content or Xo Limited traffic data relating to internal neighbourhood circulation. recommendations of the subject o Transportation Impact Study. o INTRODUCTION 2 Nature of application oX Official Plan Amendment - Site Plan attached to this form (Attach a drawing) o Zoning Amendment o Site Plan Control Application o Plan of Subdivision o Community Plan o Other 3 TIS process, and relevant Xo Guidelines for the preparation of Transportation Impact policies, procedures and Studies in Support of Development Applications approvals o Transportation Impact Studies Requirements for Capacity Analysis, Roundabouts, Turn Lanes o Safety Analysis Checklist oXXX Policy and Procedures for Access onto Regional Roads 4 Public Meeting o Required oX Not Required CONTEXT 5 Study intersections Xo Main Street & Nottinghill Drive extension (Future Intersection) (Intersections to be analyzed) Xo Site Access & Nottinghill Drive extension (Future Intersection) o Note: the consultant is o responsible to identify any o further intersections impacted as o the study progresses. o 6 Size and number of phases of Xo Phase 1: 367 dwelling units + 648 sq.m. of ground retail development o Phase 2: o Phase 3: o Phase 4: o Phase 5: 7 Approved and pending approval o development applications o o 8 Planned transportation system Xo Recent conversion to roundabout at Main & Franklin intersection improvements Xo Extension of Nottinghill Drive to Main Street Xo Future planned EA for Main Street in 2026 (potential for 4-lanes) TRAVEL DEMAND 9 Horizon years o 5 years from date of TIS Xo 5 years after full occupancy o Transportation Plan horizon for large scale projects o Interim years o Other…

- 21 – 544990 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

Item Description Details 10 Peak hour determination oX AM weekday peak hour of adjacent roadway oX PM weekday peak hour of adjacent roadway o Saturday peak of adjacent roadway o AM weekday peak hour of development o PM weekday peak hour of development o Saturday peak of development o Other… 11 Background Xo Historical traffic/transit counts - use 4% growth rate on Main Xo ROW travel demand forecasts per Region o Approved and pending approval development applications Xo Other… Streetlight Data to supplement count data o 12 Trip generation X ITE average rates - Depending on Sample size Xo ITE fitted equation o Rates published elsewhere o Observed rates for similar areas o Observed rates for similar developments in the local area o Other… 13 Trip reductions Xo Transportation Demand Management Checklist (TDM, internal, pass-by) o Published Travel Demand Management reductions o Observed Travel Demand Management reductions Xo ITE internal capture reductions for mixed-use developments - As applicable o Observed internal capture reductions for mixed-use developments Xo ITE pass-by reductions o Observed pass-by reductions for similar developments o Other… 14 Trip distribution Xo ITE trip distribution IN/OUT split o Regional travel demand o Population and employment distribution o Market analysis of catchment area o Other… 15 Trip assignment Xo Local traffic pattern Xo Site layout and access design Xo Existing turning movements Xo Other…- 2016 Transportation Tomorrow Survey EVALUATION OF IMPACTS 16 Traffic impact analysis Xo Unsignalized intersections (Use approved software) Xo left turn warrant analysis - MTO Warrants Xo signal warrant analysis o Signalized intersections Xo LOS, v/c, delay, queuing o ROW saturation flow rates o Existing signal timings for existing conditions o Optimize signal timings for future conditions o Use existing cycle length to respect coordinated corridor o Queuing analysis o Roundabouts Xo Other… - Right Turn warrants based on Regional warrants

- 22 – 544990 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

Item Description Details 17 Roundabout feasibility Xo Initial screening (Use approved software) Xo Intersection control study (10 year horizon) - if needed 18 Transit assessment o Frequency and hours of service o Presence of bus stops o Reliability of service o Passenger loads o Travel time Xo Other - to contact Region regarding planned improvements 19 Pedestrian assessment o Presence, connectivity, and width of sidewalks o Barriers and buffers from traffic o Crossing opportunities at intersections o Delay at intersections o Number of driveways and traffic volumes at the driveways o Presence of illumination o Future needs (desire lines / policy / accessibility / demand) Xo Other - Considerations of planned improvements along Main 20 Cycling assessment o Presence of a dedicated facility o Network connectivity o Number and width of travel lanes adjacent to the route o Volume and speed of traffic o Percentage of trucks and buses encountered o Pavement condition o Presence of parking /showers/change rooms o Future needs (desire lines / policy / demand) Xo Other - Considerations of planned improvements along Main 21 Safety analysis o Road safety review o Collision risk analysis o Access conflict evaluation 22 Site access and circulation Xo Review sight distances at all new access points o Internal traffic controls o Loading facilities and access o Service/maintenance vehicle access o Emergency vehicle access 23 Submission format o Three hard copies of main report including appendices (other than analysis results/output e.g. Synchro reports) Xo Minimum one original hard copy must be sealed by a professional engineer Xo Electronic copy of complete report and all appendices o Electronic copy of operational analysis files (e.g. Synchro, Arcady o Electronic copy of all signal warrant calculation files o Other

- 23 – 544990 Community Development Department Development Planning Section 50 Dickson Street, 3rd Floor, P.O. Box 669

Cambridge ON N1R 5W8 Tel: (519) 621-0740 Fax: (519) 622-6184 TTY: (519) 623-6691

Development Pre-Consultation Comments Development Pre-Consultation Committee Meeting Date: November 29, 2018 Meeting Time: 3:00 pm Secord Room, 2nd Floor, City Hall, 50 Dickson Street

Pre-Consultation: To: Samantha Dunlop Weston Consulting [email protected] Subject: D47/18, 0 Main St, CON 10 PT LOT 4 Zoning: (H)R4

Official Plan Designation: Low / Medium Density Residential Proposal: Development Pre-consultation Application for proposed 7 storey mixed-use building, 4 storey retirement facility and one option contemplates open space/amenity area, the other proposes future development lands to accommodate townhouse units fronting Sparrow Ave.

Please note that the comments are based on the proposal as submitted. Due to changing policies and regulations, these comments are valid for a period of two (2) years from the date of issuance of this letter.

Page 1 of 35

Aerial Photo:

Proposal:

Page 2 of 35

Page 3 of 35

Zoning:

Page 4 of 35

Committee Comments:

City of Cambridge, Development Planning Section Contact: Matthew Blevins Phone: (519) 621-0740 Ext. 4317 Email: [email protected]

Development Planning - Comments:  The proposed development exceeds the current permitted density of the Low/Medium Density designation. Either bonusing pursuant to Section 10.16 of the Cambridge Official Plan will be required or an application for Official Plan Amendment to address the proposed increase in height and density.  Staff is generally supportive of the proposed increased density but planning justification would need to be provided to address the density as it relates to the proposed secondary plan.  Please note that Notting Hill Drive will need to be constructed prior to, or in conjunction with, the proposed development.  What is the proposed tenure of the residential units? o If condominium, what form of condominium is proposed (please note that plan of condominium requires formal pre-consultation)  Staff prefer concept C9C which allows for future lotting of units fronting onto Sparrow Ave rather than private amenity space along the public road.  Are any affordable units being provided?  Staff appreciate the applicant providing emergency vehicular access point for lands to the west. Access point should coordinate with proposed development to the west to align with proposed internal street pattern  Pedestrian connections across to Main Street and the development to the west will need to be clearly delineated on future site plan application  The lands to the north of the subject property are currently zoned and designated for employment uses. Provide a D-Series Guideline analysis (can be included in the Planning Justification Report)  Please ensure that any LED lighting and/or signage proposed is shown on the photometric plan to ensure zero light spill at property line. (Cambridge OP Policy 5.7.6) o Staff also note that any proposed signage is subject to the

Page 5 of 35

City of Cambridge Sign By-law and will be formally reviewed through a sign permit. Should any LED signage be applied for that is not addressed on the photometric site plan, a further site plan amendment application may be required.  Site design shall have regard for the accessibility for persons with disability, in accordance with the Ontario Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation.  Incentive programs may be available for your proposed development please contact Steve Rakidzioski at 519-667-4121 ext 5154121 for Union Gas incentives and the Manager of Energy Efficiency at [email protected] for incentives available from Energy+ Inc.  See the City’s website for application fees and development charges  All reports/studies must be prepared by qualified professionals at the applicant’s cost.

Development Planning – Submission Requirements:  Zoning By-law Amendment Application is required. Official Plan Amendment may be required if the proposed development does not adequately address Official Plan compatibility policies pursuant to the bonusing process. A future site plan application will also be required and can be filed concurrently.  Planning Justification Report is required and must address Provincial, Regional, and City policies such as the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), Places to Grow (P2G) Growth Plan, Regional Official Policies Plan (ROPP), the new Regional Official Plan (ROP), and the City Official Plan. The Planning analysis to include Section 8.4.2 Residential Compatibility of the 2012 Official Plan must be addressed. Report must also include a public consultation strategy and a section addressing climate change and proposed community benefits for bonusing.  A concept plan delineating the required parking and access in accordance with the Zoning By-law is required. Plan shall also show property lines and be of an appropriate scale. Required Drawings and Reports:  Planning Justification Report  Noise Study

Page 6 of 35

 Shadow study for 7 storey building  Urban design brief  D-Series Guideline analysis  Separate parking calculations/plans for residential, institutional and commercial components to ensure adequate parking is provided.  Functional Servicing Report  SWM Brief/plans  Scoped Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)  Section 59 Notice  Proposed public benefits for bonusing and justification brief

Region of Waterloo, Transportation Planner Contact: Cheryl Marcy Phone: (519) 575-4500 Ext. 3243 Email: [email protected]

Regional Road Dedication

At this location Regional Road #97 (Main Street) has a designated road allowance width of 30.48 metres (100 feet), as listed in Schedule ‘A’ of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). The existing road width in this area of Main Street is 20.117 m (66 ft); therefore an estimated road allowance widening of 5.18 m (17 ft) will be required across the property frontage with Main Street. A daylight triangle at the proposed intersection of Nottinghill Drive and Main Street will also be required. The daylight triangle must measure 7.62 m x 7.62 m (25 ft x 25 ft), and be measured from the post road widening property line. The road widening and daylight triangle must be dedicated to the Region of Waterloo for road allowance purposes and must be dedicated without cost and free of encumbrance. It appears that the correct road widening and daylight triangle dedication has been shown on the proposed concept plan.

The applicant will need to engage an Ontario Land Surveyor (OLS) to prepare a draft Reference Plan which illustrates the required road allowance and daylight triangle dedication on Main Street. Prior to registering the Reference Plan, the OLS should submit a draft copy of the plan for review by the Transportation Planner. An electronic copy of the registered plan is to be emailed to the

Page 7 of 35

Transportation Planner. Further instructions will come from the Region’s Legal Assistant with regard to document preparation and registration. The road widening and daylight triangle dedication can be postponed to a formal Site Plan application.

The road widenings, daylight triangle, as well as any additional road widenings along Main Street identified in a Transportation Impact Study (TIS) would be required at the time of a formal Site Plan application.

Traffic Site Circulation & Access

The proposed development will obtain vehicular access to the future extension of Nottinghill Drive. There is no proposed direct access to Main Street from the proposed development. The applicant will be responsible for the closure of the existing single unit vehicular access location(s) to Main Street. Regional Road Access Permit(s) will be required for any access closure. The Regional Road Access Permit application form can be found on the Region of Waterloo website (http://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/doingBusiness/RoadandTrafficPermits.asp). Any access related items can be deferred to a future Site Plan application.

Earlier this year, the applicant’s consultant inquired about the possibility of an interim access to Main Street. An interim access to Main Street may be acceptable subject to further review of a detailed site plan and appropriate phasing that is satisfactory to the City and the Region. Any interim access would need to be closed to Regional standards once access to Nottinghill Drive has been provided. A Regional Temporary Access Permit would be required. The fee for this permit is $230. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) may be required with a future application. This requirement will depend on the timing of any development application for the subject property, taking into account other proposed and ongoing developments in the area. The applicant should confirm this requirement with Regional staff prior to submitting any development application for the subject property and once the preferred development concept for the subject property has been determined.

If TIS is required before Regional clearance can be provided for a Site Plan

Page 8 of 35

application, any recommended and approved off site works would require an approved functional design, approved cost estimate, letter of credit, and a signed agreement to the satisfaction of the Regional Solicitor. There would be a $350 fee for the review of the TIS by Regional staff. This fee must be paid prior to the final approval of the TIS.

Stormwater Management & Site Grading

The applicant must submit a detailed Site Grading & Drainage Control Plan(s) and Site Servicing Plan(s) along with a SWM report (including an electronic copy) to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo for approval. This should include drainage details for the subject property, abutting properties and the public road allowance so as to ensure compatible drainage and to show thereon all existing and proposed connections to the municipal storm sewers, sanitary sewers and water mains and all detailed erosion and siltation control features, all to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo.

The site must be graded in accordance with the approved plan and the Regional Road allowance must be restored to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Please be advised that the any new servicing connections or update to the existing servicing would require Regional approval through a separate process of Municipal Consent. For servicing approvals please contact Nora Fleming @ 519- 575-4757 x3312 Email: [email protected]

Stormwater and grading related items can be postponed to a formal Site Plan application.

Transit Planning

Grand River Transit will require two (2) shelter and landing pads in order to provide bus transit service to the proposed development. Future transit stops are planned to be located on Main Street, west of Nottinghill Drive (eastbound direction) and on Nottinghill Drive, north of Sparrow (southbound direction). The applicant will be required to provide the necessary funds for the installation of up

Page 9 of 35

to two transit shelter and landing pads prior to final approval of this development, as part of a future Site Plan application. The current approximate cost for the two transit stops is $8,600.

Transportation and Stationary Noise

It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure the proposed development is not impacted by anticipated transportation (road) noise from Main Street and/or stationary noise from any adjacent properties. Therefore, the applicant must complete an Environmental Noise Study for the proposed development at the time of any Planning application. The noise level criteria and guidelines for the preparation of the transportation aspects of the Environmental Noise Study are included in the Region of Waterloo Implementation Guideline for Noise Policies. Any requirement for the analysis of transportation and stationary noise impacts must comply with the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Environmental Noise Guideline, Publication NPC-300.

The noise consultant must be pre-approved by the Region of Waterloo. The noise consultant is responsible for obtaining current information, applying professional expertise in performing calculations, making detailed and justified recommendations, submitting the Consultant Noise Study Declaration and Owner/Authorized Agent Statement along with a copy of the Environmental Noise Study to the Region of Waterloo.

There is a $250 fee for the preparation of traffic forecasts and review of Environmental Noise Studies by Region of Waterloo staff. The noise consultant preparing the Environmental Noise Study must complete and submit a Transportation Planning Noise Assessment Fee Form. The form can be found at http://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/doingBusiness/resources/Noise_Assessment_ Fee_Application.pdf. The noise study will not be approved until payment has been received. As indicated on the form, traffic forecasts for noise assessments will be prepared within 15 business days of the data of the request, but will be withheld if payment has not been received.

Regional Road Re-construction

Page 10 of 35

This section of Main Street is identified in the Region’s 10-year Transportation Capital Base Program as up for rural resurfacing, in association with City of Cambridge sewer replacement, in 2019. For more information on this project please contact Mr. William Gilbert (519-575-4603) in the Region’s Design & Construction department.

Application Fees

In accordance with Regional Fee By-law 17-076, the applicant will be required to pay the following Regional fees:

. $1,150 – Zoning By-law Amendment review fee to be submitted to the Region with the application; . $5,750 – Official Plan Amendment fee to be submitted once City Council adopts the Amendment and it has been submitted to the Region for approval, . $2,000, plus $100 per residential unit (to a maximum fee of $5,000) with submission of a plan of condominium; $1,150 draft approval and $1,150 registration release per phase; . $250 – Transportation Noise Study Review (including traffic counts); . $402.50 for review of TIS, if required (includes pre-submission); and, . $805 – Site Plan Review fee.

The applicant is advised that any noise study submitted in support of the complete application may be subject to a peer review conducted at the applicant’s cost. Should Regional staff deem it necessary to do so, the applicant will be advised of this requirement following submission of the study.

The applicant is requested to submit an electronic copy of all plans and reports in addition to the paper copies.

Regional Development Charges

Any future development on the subject lands will be subject to provisions of Regional Development Charges By-law 14-046 or any successor thereof.

Page 11 of 35

Contacts

Community Planning Corridor Planning Sylvia Rafalski-Misch, MCIP, RPP Cheryl Marcy, C.E.T. Principal Planner Transportation Planner 519-575-4500 ext. 3114 519-575-4757 ext. 3243 [email protected] [email protected]

Please note: Comments and requirements are based on the information provided by the applicant during the pre-submission process. Should new details and/or information become available through the application process, the above-noted requirements are subject to change.

Region of Waterloo, Community Planning Contact: Sylvia Rafalski-Misch Phone: (519) 575-4500 Ext. 3114 Email: [email protected]

The applicant is proposing a 7-story mixed use residential building with 129 units, a 4-storey retirement home with 44 units and some street fronting townhouses along Sparrow Avenue, all on a property located south of Main Street and along the proposed Nottinghill Drive. The street fronting townhouses would need to be developed in conjunction with the adjacent plan of subdivision 30T-13102. The property currently has draft approval for 13 single detached lots. A pre- submission for this property was held in July of 2017 for a proposal consisting of 53 townhouse units. The lands are designated in the City of Cambridge Official Plan as Low/Medium Density Residential and are zoned (H)R4. An Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment may be required.

Community Planning

General Comments

The property is subject to a draft approved plan of subdivision (file 30T-06101) for 13 single detached lots. As the proposed development is significantly

Page 12 of 35

different from the draft approved plan and given that 11 years have passed since the draft approval, the subdivision file will need to be closed once the new plan of condominium application is submitted and processed.

In accordance with policy 5.2.8.3 of the new Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (P2G) 2017, any proposed plan of condominium application, if draft approved, may be subject to a lapsing date to be determined by the Region at the time of the application.

The proposed development does not include any details as to how the site will function in terms of ownership. Is one plan of condominium contemplated for both buildings (residential and retirement home) or will there be two plans of condominium, one for each building? How is this development proposed to be phased? This information needs to be provided.

Planning Justification Report

A Planning Justification Report (PJR) will be required and must address the requirements of the Provincial Policy Statement, the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (P2G) 2017, the Regional Official Plan (ROP) and the City of Cambridge Official Plan.

Hydrogeology and Source Water Protection

The subject property is located within Wellhead Protection Sensitivity Area 4 as designated in the ROP.

A Salt Management Plan (SMP) will be required as part of the plan of condominium application. As part of the SMP, Regional staff encourage the applicant to incorporate design considerations with respect to salt management, including:

. Ensure that cold weather stormwater flows are considered in the site design. Consideration should be given to minimize the transport of meltwater across the parking lots or driveway. This also has the potential to decrease the formation of ice and thereby the need for de-icing.

Page 13 of 35

. Directing downspouts towards pervious (i.e. grassy) surfaces to prevent runoff from freezing on parking lots and walkways. . Locating snow storage areas on impervious (i.e. paved) surfaces. . Locating snow storage areas in close proximity to catchbasins. . Using winter maintenance contractors that are Smart About SaltTM certified. . Using alternative de-icers (i.e. pickled sand) in favour of road salt.

The applicant is eligible for certification under the Smart About SaltTM program for this property. Completion of the SMP is one part of the program. To learn more about the program and to find accredited contractors please refer to: http://www.smartaboutsalt.com/. Benefits of designation under the program include cost savings through more efficient use of salt, safe winter conditions by preventing the formation of ice, and potential reductions in insurance premiums.

In addition, the proponent should visit https://taps.regionofwaterloo.ca to determine if any Prohibitions and/or Risk Management Plan requirements apply to this property under the Clean Water Act. This property falls within a Part IV area under the Act.

A Stormwater Management Plan will be required at the time of any proposed Official Plan and/or Zoning By-law Amendment applications. The Zoning By-law will need to include the prohibition of geothermal energy systems and/or earth energy systems.

Finally, any existing private wells will need to be decommissioned.

Servicing

Water Services staff advises of the following existing conditions and proposed future changes that could potentially impact the servicing of this property:

. The subject property is located in Pressure Zone Cam 1a. . Currently, supply from Cambridge Zone 1a is available from 200 mm dia watermains on Sparrow Avenue and Nottinghill Drive. . Main Street is currently supplied from Pressure Zone Cam 1 and has a 300 mm dia watermain that terminates near 825 Main Street. . The Region had a study completed by BM BluePlan, dated October 22,

Page 14 of 35

2015, which provides changes to the operation of the water distribution system including the expansion of Pressure Zone 1a. . There are several projects requiring completion for the expansion of Pressure Zone 1a that is currently anticipated to be undertaken over the next 5 years.

A Functional Servicing Report will be required. The Report needs to address the servicing of the site under existing conditions or advise if it requires any additional infrastructure to be developed.

City of Cambridge, Building Contact: Kathryn MacDonald Phone: (519) 621-0740 ext. 4306 Email: [email protected]

Building Division Proposal: Main St. –D47/18 Date: November 7, 2018 Comments:  Building A will be required to be sprinklered. Building B may be required to be fully sprinklered. Consideration should be made to required water service size for this site and locations of fire hydrants (new and existing).  Ministry of Health approval will be required for the retirement home prior to issuance of building permits for Building B.

City of Cambridge, Economic Development Contact: Trevor McWilliams Phone: (519) 740-4683 Ext. 4800 Email: [email protected]

• No comments.

City of Cambridge, Parks, Recreation & Culture Contact: Paul Willms Phone: (519) 740-4681 Ext.4262 Email: [email protected] Page 15 of 35

The following Parks, Recreation & Culture Division (PRCD) comments and submission requirements are based on information provided in the application. The requirements are based on the mandates of the PRCD (parks, trails, forestry, cemeteries, etc.) and applicable legislation. The comments below are initial, based on the information received to date, and may change with further detail, further discussion with, or submissions by, the proponent, alternative concept designs, and/or changing City or other policy between now and submission of complete applications.

Summary of PRCD Requirements:

1. Parkland dedication – condition on planning application

2. (scoped) Tree management plan/tree permit – required on first Planning application for complete application (tree permit may not be required, applicant should confirm whether or not any of the hedgerow trees are over 20cm dbh)

3. 13-15 street trees along Nottinghill frontage (plan required, letter of credit within the appropriate schedule/agreement)

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND COMMENTS:

Parkland Dedication

Parkland dedication will be required as cash-in-lieu of land as a condition on the appropriate planning application.

Comment  The proposed parks are not suitable as programmable parks based on a number of criteria and are not accepted by the City. The Official Plan also requires the 1/300 formula if land is required (whereas the 5% formula was used in the Concepts).  An appraisal will be required as per the Planning Act (day before Page 16 of 35

day of draft approval) to the satisfaction of City of Cambridge Property & Realty Services  1/500 formula to be used as per the Official Plan/Planning Act  Example for illustration purposes only of anticipated parkland dedication cash-in-lieu calculation/outcome: - 1/500 formula = 182 units / 500 units = 0.364 ha / 0.90 acres - Appraisal is $800,000/acre day before day of draft approval - $720,000 parkland dedication cash-in-lieu required (or $3,956 per unit)

Tree Management Policies & Guidelines and Tree By-law Permit

A Tree Management Plan (TMP) and Tree By-law Permit will be required for a complete application (earliest Planning application). A TMP / Tree By-law Permit (same products as for the complete Planning application) may not be required if trees above 20cm dbh do not exist on site (e.g. as part of the hedgerow on the western side of the property.

Comment

Page 17 of 35

Specific Comment The applicant should be aware that the adjacent property to the west has submitted a Landscape Plan which involves a number of plantings on the western border of the subject site. It is strongly recommended that the Tree Management Plan depict a Tree Protection Zone (silt fencing) along the western boundary whether or not the hedgerow is retained.

The TMP is scoped to the hedgerow which may or may not be shared with the neighbouring owner (875 Main). The scope would also involve not tagging individual trees within the hedgerow (“Detailed Inventory”) but as a General Inventory of the feature as per the TMP&G, and if not removed a TPZ fence line should be shown on the submitted TMP. Additionally, preservation of the hedgerow may provide some screening/premium lots. If any of the hedgerow trees are over 20cm dbh then, despite the above noting a General Inventory, those specimens would be subject to the City’s private property tree by-law and would require a permit if they are to be removed or injured.

General Comment

Trees, both City street trees in the right-of-way and your site’s trees on private property, should be looked at very early in the planning process.

A Tree Management Plan (TMP) will provide an inventory of trees above 10cm dbh, demonstrate Tree Protection Zone fencing for taking trees through the construction process, and will complete compensation calculations for trees above 20cm dbh under the private property by-law, and if applicable, compensation or protection of City street trees. The City’s by-laws which should be incorporated into the TMP include the following:

 By-law 71-06 – “City-owned street tree by-law”  By-law 124-18 – “private property tree by-law” Page 18 of 35

The City’s street tree by-law (71-06) concerns trees in the right-of- way typically called “street trees”. You may be proposing a new driveway (or a driveway on a new severance) that would require removal of the tree. Approval for city street tree removals is not always forthcoming and plans may have to be adjusted. The replacement cost of the tree and compensation planting, if approval is provided by the City should also be considered in addition to tree removal costs. Ownership of the tree is determined by its location (on City or on private property). City street trees must be inventoried and Tree Protection Zones and measures demonstrated in Tree Management Plan.

The City’s private property tree by-law (124-18) applies to all the trees on your site (above 20cm dbh) and prohibits removals without an approved permit and Tree Management Plan. Injury or destruction of trees requires a replacement planting and/or contribution to the Replacement Tree Planting Fund. Trees to be removed or injured will be depicted on the Tree Management Plan.

The Tree Management Plan should feature a table/plan and report, including a Detailed Inventory of each tree above 10cm dbh (subject to any scoping) and outlining:

1. Any permit requirements or information from the City tree by- laws including replacement tree planting plans and/or compensation payments (e.g. take all trees above 20cm dbh from the inventory and use the Tree Permit Application Form table to calculate compensation costs);

2. trees to be retained (and protection measures) and trees to be removed due to construction, grading, etc.. Trees to be injured and the measures to limit impacts will also be depicted on the plan alongside removals and retained trees with their Tree Protection Zone fencing;

3. special attention should note proposed protection measures, or removal rationale in the inventory table, for trees in the following Page 19 of 35

categories:

a. on boundaries, or “straddling trees” (these trees will require the written permission of the neighbour to remove as per the Forestry Act and letters should be submitted with the Tree Management Plan);

b. trees that provide some measure of screening/compatibility between the new development and existing neighbouring uses;

c. trees regulated by others (e.g. Endangered Species such as Butternut);

d. on adjacent properties should their pre-construction driplines enter the construction zones as well as signed letters from adjacent property owners noting their understanding of protection measures and suggesting any compensation planting should the applicant/construction activities damage or destroy trees on their properties within a set amount of time;

e. on City right-of-ways through the City street tree By- law 71-06;

f. trees regulated by the City’s private property tree By- law 124-18. Trees above 20cm dbh. The application form, arborist’s assessment, and compensation planting plan or funds will be required as part of the tree management plan submission.

City approval of a Tree Management Plan does not include approval of the foreseeable destruction of trees on adjacent properties and the City assumes no liability – the onus is on the applicant to conduct a thorough inventory of trees susceptible to construction impacts, note retained trees and removals, plan- implement-inspect TPZ protection measures, and to compensate neighbours for any losses should all the above reasonable efforts fail. The tree by-law (124-18) requires signed statements by neighbours for any trees injured or destroyed on their property.

Page 20 of 35

No TMP/Tree Permit will be reviewed unless all aspects, including signed letters from neighbours, are included within the information submitted and an application will not be considered complete.

Trails

No comments.

Street Tree Plan, Stormwater Management Plan, or other Landscape Plans

13-15 street trees will be required along the Nottinghill frontage. Street tree plan is required (together with Composite Utility Plan), and a letter of credit within the appropriate agreement/planning application (e.g. Plan of Condominium). Letter of credit to be calculated based on Engineering Manual standards (e.g. minimum tree every 12m of road frontage). Trees not established due to conflicts as noted in the Composite Utility Plan will still be required and applicant will have to demonstrate on the street tree plan how these trees will be provided (e.g. may involve silva cells, forfeit of letter of credit or cash-in-lieu of trees and trees are planted by the City, etc.).

The interior of the subject site will likely be required to provide a Landscape Plan as a condition (by others, e.g. Planning Division) of Site Plan or other appropriate planning application.

Fencing

The City’s fence policy does not apply as the property does not abut City lands.

Open Space

No open space associated with the subject property to convey to the City.

Page 21 of 35

Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) Design Standard for Public Spaces (DOPS)

PRCD has no requirements at this time as no parks/public spaces are proposed. However, it is anticipated that at Site Plan accessibility to be taken into account. The Supervisor of Accessibility and Inclusion Services normally provides comments at the Site Plan stage. Comments are sometimes provided at this early stage in the development process through the PRCD mandates if applicable or if a future park, trail, or public space is part of the application.

Cemeteries

No requirements or comments.

City of Cambridge, Planner - Heritage Contact: Laura Waldie Phone: (519) 621-0740 Ext. 4788 Email: [email protected]

• No comments.

City of Cambridge, Senior Planner - Environmental Contact: Kathy Padgett Phone: 519-621-0740 ext. 4826 Email: [email protected]

A Locally Significant Natural Area (MNR Wooded Area) hedgerow is identified along the rear of the property. I have confirmed that this feature is no longer present on the site. Record of Site Condition #2435 was filed for this site on November 8, 2015 for a change in use from agriculture/other to residential. The site is located within a Source Water Protection Area and requires a Notice of Source Protection Plan Compliance (Section 59 Notice) from the Region (taps.regionofwaterloo.ca) as part of a complete application.

Page 22 of 35

City of Cambridge Development Engineering Contact: Adam Ripper Phone: (519) 621-0740 Ext. 4778 Email: [email protected]

Submission Requirements  Provide a Site Grading Plan  Provide a Site Servicing Plan  Provide a Stormwater Management Brief  Provide a Functional Servicing Brief Development Engineering Comments Stormwater Management  The City’s 5 year IDF parameters are a = 1219.8, b = 10.5 and c = 0.823. The City’s 100 year IDF parameters are a = 3015.1, b = 21 and c = 0.870.  Stormwater quality and quantity control for this site is provided by the SWM Facility B (DW192) which was constructed as part of the Greengate subdivision. This site was accounted for in the subdivision SWM design but as single family homes. As such, this site was assigned a runoff coefficient of 0.45. On-site storm water management will be required for any flows in excess of the design flows (to be detailed in a SWM Brief). An excerpt of the Greengate Strom Drainage Area Plan has been attached to these comments. Servicing  The following services are to be installed on the future Nottinghill Drive adjacent to the subject site: - 200mm watermain - 200mm Sanitary Sewer - 375mm/450mm Storm Sewer  The following services have been installed on Sparrow Avenue adjacent to the subject site: - 200mm watermain - 200mm Sanitary Sewer

Page 23 of 35

- 450mm Storm Sewer

 This site was accounted for in sanitary design completed as part of the adjacent Greengate Subdivision. This site was assigned a population density of 115 persons per hectare. The servicing brief should include a review of the available sanitary outlets and their available capacities. An excerpt of the Greengate Sanitary Drainage Area Plan has been attached to these comments.  An inspection manhole is required on the sanitary service and must be located on private lands.  By-Law #146-03 permits only one (1) water service and meter per property. The City does not make provision(s) for sub-metering on a property. If the site is developed as a single condo block then only one water service will permitted.  The City must approve the optimum water meter size (and its location). Submit water demand calculation sheets for the entire property/development, per the City’s Water Customer Data Sheets standard.  By-Law #146-03 requires the Owner to purchase from the City any water meter larger than 25 mm (1”). Meter fees will be part of the new servicing installation costs.  All watermain 100 mm (4”) and larger require a Watermain Commissioning Plan to be submitted for approval. For City procedures on water quality testing, contact the Engineering Services Division.  By-Law #146-03 specifies that if the length of the water service piping between the property line and the building exceeds 30 metres, the Owner shall build, at their own expense, a chamber, protected against frost and theft, easily accessible off of the roadway, and as close as practical to the property line, for the purpose of housing the water meter. Grading  Curb and gutter along the municipal right-of-way is to extend through the entrances.  Roof leader discharge locations to be indicated.  No sheet flow from any impervious areas is allowed to be discharged

Page 24 of 35

directly onto the ROW.  Provide centerline of road elevations for full frontage.  Provide existing geodetic elevations of adjacent properties along property lines for a minimum of 10 metres off the applicant’s property line.  Use drainage arrows to indicate existing surface drainage of abutting properties along property lines. Erosion & Sediment Control  A $5,000 erosion control security deposit will be required as part of any subsequent Site Plan Approval to ensure compliance with the approved erosion (and siltation) control measures.  Provide silt/erosion control fencing for control of siltation/erosion to abutting properties and ROW. General  All proposed site works adjacent to Regional Roads require Regional Municipality of Waterloo (RMOW) approval(s).

 All servicing work within the road allowance for the proposed development including, but not limited to, installation of services to the property line, and relocation of services, will be completed by the City’s Public Works Division at 100% Owner’s expense.  Cost estimates for work by the City within the road allowance are prepared by City Staff upon receipt of the estimate fee of $200.00 plus HST.  The Contractor will be responsible to obtain an Access Permit to complete all surface works within the boulevard, including, but not limited to; curb cuts, installation of curb and gutter, entrance aprons, sidewalk, and reinstatement / restoration of finished surfaces (vegetation, asphalt, etc.).  Once the Access Permit is approved, the following items will be required: o A Highway Occupancy Permit (HOP) will be required for work by the Contractor within the right-of-way. Please contact Dennis Lopes (Senior Civil Engineering Technologist) at (519) 621-0740

Page 25 of 35

Ext. 4324 with respect to the same. o A Certified Copy of the Contractor’s (current) Insurance Policy is to be provided, indicating that the Contractor carries a comprehensive liability insurance policy of at least $5,000,000, naming the City as additional insured thereunder and protecting them against all claims for any and all damage or injury to any persons and/or any and all damage to any public or private property resulting from the completion of the proposed works. o The Contractor must submit a W.S.I.B. Certificate that remains current for the proposed duration of the site works. o Provide a cost estimate for all works within the right-of-way. Development and Infrastructure will require a guaranteed security for 100% of the verified amount. Holdbacks will be maintained following completion of the works. In addition, holdbacks and lengths of holdback are site specific relating to the magnitude of the job.  The City will inspect all surface works, at the Owner’s expense, within the right-of-way prior to the release of securities. o The inspection fee will be calculated using the current hourly rate based on the scope of work being undertaken.  Upon project completion, the Engineering Department will require a signed and sealed letter of compliance from a Professional Engineer confirming that the site grading has been inspected and all earth grade surfaces are in general compliance with the approved grades and cross- sections and are within tolerances as specified under the applicable OPSS(s).  Upon project completion, the Engineering Division will require a letter of compliance from the Stormwater Management Consultant that the SWM facilities have been inspected and the “as built” controls and major drainage system is according to the approved SWM design. If there is a difference between the as-built and design conditions, the Engineering Division and the Developer would have to be notified and remedial actions submitted for approvals.  No alteration of grading is permitted on site until the applicant enters into a site plan or subdivision servicing agreement with the City. Grading of

Page 26 of 35

site is subject to Grading Control By-Law No. 160-09.  Under NO circumstance is a connection to the municipal water system to be made without the consent and presence of City of Cambridge Public Works staff. Please note that, per Regulatory requirements, only certified water operators may isolate watermains or reconnect isolated watermains.

Storm Drainage Area Plan Excerpt

Page 27 of 35

Sanitary Drainage Area Plan Excerpt

Page 28 of 35

City of Cambridge Transportation Engineering Contact: Jason Leach Phone: (519) 621-0740 Ext. 4268 Email: [email protected]

Transportation Engineering Action Items

 A scoped Transportation Impact Study (TIS) is required to be completed for this development. The scoped TIS will need to analyze the traffic volumes, turning movements, capacity and recommend any improvements for all site access and the intersection of Main Street at Nottinghill Drive. The study consultant must arrange to meet with Transportation Engineering staff prior to the study commencing to discuss the requirements of the study. This can be done in conjunction with the Region of Waterloo Transportation Impact Study pre-

Page 29 of 35

consultation.  Nottinghill Drive will need to be constructed and connected to Main Street prior to the development of this property.  Provide pedestrian connections to the municipal sidewalk.  Consider active transportation enhancements to the development such as providing indoor bike storage for residents as well as sheltered outdoor bike racks for visitors.  Complete the Transportation Demand Management checklist. Contact Jason Leach for further instruction.  Provide direct vehicular and pedestrian connections to the adjacent development to the west. Both properties will be required to enter into reciprocal access agreements registered on title.

Transportation Engineering Comments

 Street fronting towns on Sparrow Avenue currently do not have access to Sparrow Avenue.  Street fronting towns on Sparrow Avenue will reduce the on-street parking capacity on Sparrow Avenue.  Nottinghill Drive is to have a minimum right-of-way width of 20.0m. In addition, a daylight radius as per the City’s of Engineering Standards and Development Manual will be required where the property lines of Nottinghill Drive and Sparrow Avenue meet.  Sidewalk minimum widths are as follows: o Standard sidewalk 1.5m o Curb face sidewalk 1.8m o Sidewalk adjacent to perpendicular parking 2.1m

City of Cambridge, Fire Department Contact: Mark Yantha Phone: (519) 621-6001 Ext. 2225 Email: [email protected]

Cambridge Fire Action Items

Page 30 of 35

 Show all Fire Hydrants.  Indicate Fire Routes.  Indicate Fire Department connections.  A Placard above the Fire Department connection if wood frame construction - [WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION]  A Fire Safety Plan shall be approved and implemented prior to occupancy.  A Multiple Unit Identification sign c/w details may be required.  Further comments will be provided at Site Plan Review

Cambridge Fire Comments

 none

Energy+ Inc. Contact: Helen Robinson Phone: (519) 621-3530 Email: [email protected]

Energy+ Inc. has no objection to either proposal by the Applicant to re-develop the property noted above to accommodate a residential development consisting of as seven-story mixed-use building at the corner of Main and Nottinghill and a four-storey retirement home to the south with either a proposed future block for freehold townhouse units fronting onto Sparrow or private amenity space. The Applicant will be required to enter into a Service Agreement with Energy+ Inc. to establish the terms and conditions to service the development at 100% cost. The developer should be aware costs to service this development could be substantial. Please allow a minimum of six months for determination of service needs. The Applicant will be responsible for all costs to upgrade or relocate existing electrical plant as a result of this Application at 100% Customer Cost. If easements are required as a result of this proposal the Applicant will be responsible for all costs. Early consultation with Energy+’s Legal Co ordinator is recommended. Additional conditions may be placed on the Application once it gets to the Draft Plan of Subdivision. Should additional information be required, kindly contact me at your

Page 31 of 35

convenience. Kindest Regards, ENERGY+ INC. Helen Robinson the Helen Robinson Engineering Legal Co-ordinator

Grand River Conservation Authority Contact: John Brum Phone: (519) 621-2763 Ext. 2233 Email: [email protected]

• No comments.

Accessibility Coordinator Contact: Vanessa Lopak Phone: (519) 740-4680 Ext. 4765 Email: [email protected]

Action Items:



Comments:

 Accessible exterior pathways should connect the buildings to the main sidewalk, parking, amenity areas, etc. They should be at least 1500mm wide (greater if curb-facing) and provide safe accessible pedestrian crossings.  Ensure appropriate widths for accessible parking spaces and adjacent access aisles. Type A parking spaces must have 3400 mm minimum width and signage designating them as ‘van accessible’. Type B parking spaces must have 2400 mm minimum width and signage designating them as accessible. Access aisles must be adjacent to accessible parking spaces, run the full length of the space, be marked with high tonal contrast diagonal lines, and have 1500 mm minimum width.  Ensure accessible path of travel from accessible parking space to the

Page 32 of 35

exterior path of travel, leading to a building entrance, including curb cuts and tactile warning surface indicators.  Ensure accessible path of travel to park and amenity area, including curb cuts and tactile warning surface indicators.  Ensure amenity area is accessible, such as placement of furniture to allow for mobility devices to navigate around, allowing space beside any benches for service animals or mobility devices, accessible seating and/or eating areas (e.g. picnic tables).  Parks should have accessible play equipment and be accessible.  For more information on these comments, please see the Global Alliance on Accessible Technologies and Environments (Gaates), Illustrated Technical Guide to the Accessibility Standard for Design of Public Spaces, https://gaates.org/DOPS/default.php  Consider making units accessible, particular retirement units. This includes (among other requirements) smooth transitions (door thresholds), wider doorways, accessible kitchens, accessible / roll in showers, and barrier-free access to any balconies or patios.  Interior common spaces should be accessible, including automatic door openers, and accessible placement of furniture.

Waterloo Region District School Board Contact: Shawn Callon Phone: (519) 570-0003 Ext. 4308 Email: [email protected]

• No comments.

Waterloo Catholic District School Board Contact: Virina Elgawly Phone: (519) 578-3660 x 2359 Email: [email protected]

• No comments.

Page 33 of 35

City of Cambridge, Planner - Reurbanization Contact: Valerie Spring Phone: (519) 621-0740 Ext. 4213 Email: [email protected]

The subject property was discussed at a pre-consultation meeting on July 27, 2017 with concept plans to redevelop the site with stacked townhouses. The subject property is zoned (H) R4 in the City of Cambridge Zoning By-law and is currently designated as Low/Medium density residential in the 2012 City of Cambridge Official Plan. As indicated at the time of the July 2017 pre-consultation meeting, this property is within the study boundaries of the Growth and Intensification Study – Main and Dundas Street South area. As part of the Study, a Secondary Plan has been drafted for this area which will provide the detailed planning framework to guide future development and redevelopment (Policy 8.7.2.B (6)). A Statutory Public meeting, in accordance with the Planning Act, has been held and a further meeting with the area stakeholders is anticipated in 2019. Please note, the results of the Study will need final approval by the City of Cambridge and Region of Waterloo. At this time, the subject property has been identified as low density residential in the draft Secondary Plan. This designation is anticipated to change to medium density residential. Medium density as proposed in the draft Secondary Plan will include street and stacked townhomes. The permitted height for new residential is proposed to be a minimum of 2 storeys up to a maximum of 4 storeys. Two alternative design concepts have been proposed for the subject property which is currently a vacant parcel of land approximately 0.8 hectares (1.98 acres) in size. Concept C9A consists of two “L” shaped apartment buildings. The first building has a proposed height of seven storeys and the second building has a proposed height of four storeys. The estimated density is 233.8 u/ha which does not conforms to Policy 8.4.6.3 a) of the 2012 Cambridge Official Plan which states low-medium residential density will have a maximum density of 40 units per hectare. Concept C9A does not conform to the proposed design principles of the draft Secondary Plan because its height is in excess of 4 storeys and would not meet

Page 34 of 35

the criteria for the medium density residential.

Concept C9C has a density of 254.4 u/ha which does not conform to Policy 8.4.6.3 a) of the 2012 Official Plan and would require an Official Plan Amendment. Concept C9C does not conform to the design principles of the Secondary Plan because the height exceeds the proposed 4 storeys in the draft Secondary Plan which would not meet the criteria for medium density residential. Density bonusing may be considered to allow the proposed density in exchange for community benefits. The benefits the applicant might consider are: affordable housing; public art or transit improvements. Affordable Housing is encouraged in the City of Cambridge Official Plan, the Region Official Plan and the Growth Plan (2017). The draft Secondary Plan encourages the re-development of infill properties which relate to adjacent properties. Infill properties should be connected to services, such as transportation, through trails or sidewalks. Staff continues to encourage the applicant to discuss this proposal with others who are proposing to develop adjacent lands. Further, the applicant is encouraged to participate as a Stakeholder at any future public consultation sessions of the Growth and Intensification Study. The staff contact for this study is Valerie Spring, Senior Planner – Reurbanization, [email protected] (519) 623-1340 ext. 4213.

Page 35 of 35

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Appendix B SITE PLAN July 9, 2020

Appendix B SITE PLAN

B.1

NOTES: DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT

PART OF LOT 4 CON 10 1. Property boundaries as per Plan 58R-15518 dated September 2006. NORTH DUMFRIES 2. Air photograph from Google Earth, imagery date 2016. DESIGNATED AS PART 1 ON 58R-15518 3. Not based on engineering, grading, environmental and/or any other required investigation. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE Estimated Centre Line 4. Road widenings are estimated only and subject MAIN STREET EAST to review by approval authorities. This concept assumes Planned ROW 30.48m that the Nottinghill Drive right-of-way is entirely off of the subject lands. '40"E POTENTIAL 52.854 N76°50 5. Proposed development to the west of subject lands based PEDESTRIAN ESTIMATED ROAD WIDENING 5.2M on Site Plan prepared by Lima Architects Inc., CONNECTION 1.5m SIDEWALK dated October 2018. 6. Estimated GFA excludes parking ramp and loading area.

4 STY 7. All areas are approximate.

RETAIL 8. 1 bedroom units estimated at 60m2/unit, and 2 bedroom units estimated at 80m2/unit. 9. 85% floor efficiency assumed for unit estimate.

5 10. UG parking estimated @ 110 sp/acre.

S 12 STY 11. Amenity area estimated and subject to change based on

E detailed design.

A 809

L 12. Walkways as shown are conceptual only.

6 STY .

BUILDING A

B 149 2 5.5 TYPE

. 9 MIXED-USE 12 STOREY

TYPE A DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS:

Total Land Area: 0.80 ha

OUTDOOR Estimated Road Widening; 0.03 ha AMENITY

Net Area: 0.77 ha .

Net Density: 476.6 uph D R

R (Dwelling units/net residential ha.)

O D

P 3.76 FSI Gross:

A A FSI Net:

R M 3.90

T O LL L

3x10

Building Footprint:

184 3,912 m2 I

G .

I NG Building Coverage: 50.8% 6 STY 152 4 STY Building A GFA: 16,746 m2

NGH Retail: 648 m2 I Residential: 16,098 m2

PRIVATE ROAD 6M WIDE TT Building B:

Residential: 13,295 m2 POTENTIAL EDESTRIAN P 4 STY NO Total GFA: 30,041 m2 CONNECTION

3x10

O 6 STY

I EMERGENCY NG Units: BLDG. A BLDG. B TOTAL ACCESS D 1 bed 121 units 100 units 221 units

R O 2 bed 80 units 66 units 146 units P 10 STY

- O Total 201 units 166 units 367 units

DECK

Required parking: 475.0 sp W

" Retail @ 2.5 sp/100m2 of GLA* 16.2 sp

Apartment @ 1.25 sp/unit (includes visitor) 458.8 sp 25 TYPE B BUILDING B ' MENT * GLA=Gross Leasable Area APART 07 STOREY ° TYPE A 10

14 Parking provided: 443 sp N

W Surface 25 sp "

Estimated 2 levels UG: 418 sp

' 04

° Total Amenity Area Required: 8,800 m²

1 bed @ 20m²/unit 4,420 m² 14

N 2 bed @ 30m²/unit 4,380 m² 6 STY 4 STY Estimated Amenity Area Provided: 7,452 m² LANDSCAPED AREA Outdoor Landscaped Area 2,215 m² 53.011 Indoor Common Amenity Area 734 m² N74°16'25"E Podium Roof top Amenity Area 2,413 m²

Private Balconies 2,090 m²

LAND OWNED WESTON Vaughan:201 Millway Ave. Suite 19 Vaughan, Ontario L4K 5K8 EXISTING HYDRANT BY OTHERS SPARROW AVENUE CONSULTING T. 905.738.8080 F. 905.738.6637

Toronto: 268 Berkeley St. planning + urban design Toronto, Ontario M5A 2X5 T. 416.640.9917 F. 905.738.6637

1-800.363.3558 westonconsulting.com 0 10 20 40m DRAWN / REVISED

SCALE METRES 07 JAN 2020 inclusion of walkways & pedestrian connections, parking dimensions etc.

02 JAN 2020 revised with additional height as per client recommendation

LEGEND 17 OCT 2019 revised with additional storeys

09 OCT 2019 First Draft

Drawing Number:

File Number: 8514

Drawn By: MH ESTIMATED ROAD WIDENING Planner: RW Scale: see scale bar C1 CAD: 8514/concepts/2020/C1_2020-01-07.dgn PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Appendix C BUS SCHEDULES AND ROUTE MAPS July 9, 2020

Appendix C BUS SCHEDULES AND ROUTE MAPS

C.1

River St. Lake Louise Blvd. See inset for complete route 21 Elmira details Conservation Dr. See inset for complete route 77 Wilmot details 13

Laurelwood Dr. Westmount Rd. N 73 Northlake Dr. Northlake Dr.

Erbsville Rd. 19A Highpoint Ave.Northfield Dr. W.

31 9 UW Station Connecting Routes Randall Dr. 301 201 9 13 19 NewTransit Plaza 31 Cedarbrae Columbia St. W.under construction 21 Ave. 19B Glen Forrest Blvd. Kumpf Dr. Bathurst The Boardwalk Northfield Parkside Dr. King St. N. Weber St. N. Dr. Connecting Routes NorthlandRupert Rd. St. Conestoga Station 202 Fischer-Hallman Rd. Connecting Routes 1 4 5 Hagey Blvd. 202 204 Research and Technology 301 201 202 6 7 Albert St. 13 20 29 77 5 9 14 21 29 31 Kraus 14 McMurray Rd. Dr. Westvale Dr. 29 19 Frobisher Dr. Conestoga Erb St. W. Northfield Dr. E. University of Waterloo University Ave. W. Keats Way Ring Road Hazel St. 201 Labrador Dr.

Waterloo University Ave. W. King St. N. Chesapeake Dr. 201 77 Laurier-Waterloo Park 29 7

Eastbridge Blvd. BedfordNew Dr. Ira Needles Blvd. Davenport Rd. Westwood Dr. Highview Dr. MeadowsRolling Dr. Lexington Rd. Waterloo Public Square 31 Willis Way Caroline St. Victoria St. S.

4 Weber St. N. Dansbury Dr.

Dunvegan Dr. Dr. Dunvegan Dunvegan 204 Westmount Rd. S. Allen Inwood Dr. University Ave. E. Glasgow St. 21 Elmira Chopin Dr. Lincoln Rd. Westheights Dr. 202 King St. S. Union St. Listowel Rd. 12 Erb St. E. St. Jacobs Driftwood Dr. Bridge St. King St. N. Snyder Ave. S. Church St. W 2 Grand River Hospital Highland Rd. W. Elmira Union St. E. Weber St. N.

Bridgeport Rd. E. Arthur St. S. W. St. First McGarry Dr. 20

Belmont Ave. W. 6 Queen’s Blvd. Farmers Arthur St. S. Elm Ridge Dr. 16 Rd. Market 8 Sunrise Centre

King St. W. Connecting Routes Waterloo 1 King St. N. 205 3 22 33 Weber St. S. Queen St. S. Central Station Margaret Ave. New station under construction 5 4 Conestoga 22 Station David Bergey Dr. Fischer-Hallman Rd. Victoria Park Activa Ave. Greenbrook Dr. Kitchener City Hall Lancaster St. W. 33 205 Bloomingdale Rd. N.

Ottawa St. S. BentonQueen St. The Boardwalk Medical Centre r ede ld Trussler Rd. Ira Needles Blvd. Duke St. E. Queen St. N. 77 Wilmot Stirling Ave. Wellington St. N. Schweitzer St. Frederick Waterloo Max Becker Dr. The Boardwalk

Chandler Dr. Kitchener Market Baden Petersburg Westmount Rd. E. Elmsdale Dr. Legend Stanley Ave. Daniel Ave. 2 Main Route Waterloo St Snyder’s Rd. W. Snyder’s Rd. E. Highland Rd. Mill St. Tillsley 3 Frederick St. Flex Route Service Forrest/Hincks Dr. 201 Charles St. Krug St. Wilmot Recreation New Hamburg Complex Highway 7/8 Borden Nithview Huron Rd. Block Line Rd. Rittenhouse Rd. Shirley Ave. Peel St. Kingswood Dr. Huron St. Mill Morningside Bleams Rd. 20 Victoria St. N. Strasburg Rd. 34 Stonecroft Seabrook Dr. Ottawa St. N. Bingemans McIntyre Dr. Centre Dr King St. E.

River Rd. Ludolph St. 22 Weber St. E. Downtown Kitchener Courtland Ave. E. 7 Parkvale Dr. Lennox Shirley Dr. 8 Lorraine Natchez Rd. Lewis Way Halifax Dixon St. Ave. Dr. 6 Future Trillium Dr. Transit Woodbine Ave. 7 Block Line First St. 204 Hub 20 16 34 12 Dr. Centennial Rd. Central Fourth Ave. Forwell Rd. Weber St. 6 Confederation Franklin St. N. 205 Homer Watson Blvd. 28 Holborn Traynor Ave. Regional Strasburg Rd. 26 Dr. 20 33 Bleams Rd. Headquarters Wilson Ave. Lackner Blvd. Huron Rd. Beasley Dr. Connaught St. Kitchener Library Kingsway Dr. River Rd. 20

Greenfield Ave. Kitchener City Hall 1 Dr. Victoria St. 4 College CitySt. Hall Stanley Park Mall 201 Oldfield 7 204 Frederick St. Kitchener Fairway Connecting Routes Water St. Young St. Biehn Dr. Wabanaki Fairway Rd. S. 205 1 2 Francis St. King St. Dr. Wilson Ave 8 Manitou Dr. 10 Victoria Park 20 23 28 Joseph St. Regional Black Zeller Dr. Thaler Ave. 1 110 Courthouse Walnut Dr. Fairway Rd. N. 6 Queen St. Fairway Station Bechtel Dr. Pioneer Dr. Connecting Routes Frederick Gaukel St. Duke St. 301 302 206 1 6

Morgan Ave 7 8 10 12 23 27 23 Queen 76 Victoria Park Ontario St. Robert Ferrie Dr. Scott St. Dr. 27 28 110 Morrison Rd. GRT Customer 10A Old Zeller Dr. Legend Service Centre 3 Church St.

N LRT Station 6 Charles St. Carriage

Old Old 206 Bus Stop Benton St. Doon South Dr. 110 Park Dr. Thomas Slee Dr. Mill Doon Mills Dr.

Pinnacle Dr.

Map Legend 10

Route 61 Homer Watson Blvd. New Dundee Rd. Conestoga College Weekends only Sportsworld Station College Blvd.Conestoga Conestoga College Blvd. Doon Connecting Routes 301 Light rail 302 Bus Bus iXpress stop locations Connecting Routes

Doon Valley Dr. 302 203 206 67 72 201 203 10 36 Sportsworld Route direction Roundabouts 16 36 57 (No arrow placed on two way sections)

G 72

a a

t t

61 76 110 e

Tu-Lane w

a a

St. y

P Route Number and Names

a a Boxwood Dr.

r r

k 203 k

Vondrau Dr. Conestoga College Cambridge 1 Queen-River 29 Keats-University Connecting Routes

King St.

Cherry Blossom Rd. 2 Stirling 31 Columbia 203 57 61 Fountain St. Fountain St. N. 67 Ottawa South Huron Heroux Devtek Dr. 3 33 Maple Grove Rd. Glasgow-Margaret Preston Pkwy. 4 34 Bingemans Shantz 61 Hill Rd. 5 Erb 36 Thomas Slee 57 206 6 Bridge-Courtland 50 Dundas Blair Rd.

King Hespeler Argyle St. S. 203 7 51 Westminster Dr. Weber Franklin Eagle St. N. 8 53 Homuth Ave.Rose St. Lowther St. S. Laurel St. 9 Lakeshore 54 Lisbon Pines

Pioneer Grand Ridge Cambridge Centre Station 10 55 Connecting Routes Beck St. 67 Westmount Hamilton St. 12 56 Dunbar 302 203 50 51 53 56 King St. 56 Fisher Mills Rd. Concession Rd. Laurelwood LangeLangs Dr. Poplar Dr. 13 57 Blair 60 61 64 67 75 Scott Rd. Blackridge Rd. Fairview Rd. 14 Bathurst 58 Elmwood GoebelGoebel Ave Bishop St. Ave 51A Queen St. W. Strasburg-Belmont Cambridge Guelph Ave. 16 59 Christopher Pinebush 51A Holiday Inn Dr. Dunbar Rd. Industrial Rd. Hazel Northview Acres 50 61 64 Baldwin Dr. 19 60 Victoria-Frederick Fountain

Queen St. E. 20 61 Blair Rd. Blair Blair Rd. Blair Hespeler Rd. Elmira Champlain Salisbury Ave. Pinebush Rd. 21 63 Cambridge Centre Winston Blvd. Melran Conestoga Blvd. Laurentian West Langs Dunbar 67 Dr. 22 64 Kent St. 55 51 Rd. Can-Amera Idlewood Eagle-Pinebush 203 23 67 Coronation Blvd. Munch Ave. Cooper St. McMeeken Dr. Kerwood Dr. Trillium Saginaw Can-Amera Pkwy. Sheldon Dr. 51B 26 75 Hillcrest Dr. Jamieson Pkwy. 57 Sunset Blvd. Elgin St. Cedar St. Brooklyn Rd. 51B Southwood Dr. Churchill Dr. Delta 27 Chicopee 110 College Express Ave.

Woodside St. Andrews St. Avenue Rd. Franklin North Barrie Ln George St. 28 Crombie St. Grand Ridge Dr. 206 60 Thompson Dr. Fleming Dr. Townline Rd. First Ave. Green Vista Dr. Glamis Rd. Franklin Blvd. Elmwood Ave. 55 Grand Ave. Ainslie St. Dundas St. busPlus 58 Robson Ave. Can-Amera Pkwy. Moscrip Rd. Ainslie Terminal Beverly St. Glenmorris St. MiddletonSt. 206 Samuelson St. 75 Saginaw Pkwy. McNaughton Elgin St. 53 Flex Boxwood Doon Mills Essex PointBurnett Ave.Dr. 72 76 Ainslie Terminal Concession St. Connecting Routes Coulthard Blvd. t Rich Ave. St. MainOak St. St. S Baintree Way. Northlake Wilmot Ballantyne Ave.re Alison Ave. CowanBurnett Blvd. Ave. 73 77 302 206 51 53 54 nt Albert St. CCentree St Franklin Blvd. Elgin St. N. 55 57 58 59 63 Hilltop Dr. Clyde Rd. iXpress McKay St 63 Main St. McDonald Ave Fischer-Hallman Highland-Victoria Langlaw Dr. Savage Dr. 201 204 Townline Rd. Edgemere Dr. Champlain Ave. Dundas St. Christopher Dr. 202 University 205 Ottawa

Myers Rd. Elgin St. S. Dobbie Dr. 59 54 Green Gate Blvd. 203 Maple Grove 206 Coronation

50 Fitzgerald Dr. Franklin Blvd.

Gatehouse Dr.

Lisbon Pines Dr. Wesley Blvd. Bus Stops to Franklin/ to Cambridge Centre Green Gate Station

Cambridge 1063 Franklin / 1031 A Centre Station F Green Gate Bishop / Hespeler Rd. 1321 Green Gate / Ferncliffe 2487 Bishop / Industrial 3850 Nottinghill / Honey 2488 1001 Bishop St. N. 1051 Wesley / Maple Bush 2489 690 Bishop St. N. 3878 Wesley / Fitzgerald 2490 Bishop / Mary 2313 Fitzgerald / Chester 2975 Bishop / Pineview 1445 Dundas / Maple Bush 2980 Bishop / Duke 1401 Dundas / Franklin 2976 B King / Bishop 1591 Dundas / South E Cambridge 2176 King / Brower 1592 Centre King / Blue Heron 1593 Dundas / Main 2977 Coronation / Oriole 1594 Dundas / Monroe 2978 Coronation / Blue Dundas / Elgin 2979 Heron 1595 Dundas / Gore 2360 Coronation / Highland 3609 1608 720 Coronation Blvd. 1596 Dundas / Grantham Dundas / Cambridge St. 1609 Coronation / Cambridge Dundas / Roxboro 1610 C 1597 Memorial Dundas / Jarvis 1611 Hospital D Delta Station 1612

Coronation / Oliver 2899 Coronation / Goldie 1613 Coronation / Goldie 2900 Coronation / Oliver 1614 D Delta Station 1600 Coronation Dundas / Hopeton 1601 / Cambridge C 1615 Dundas / Cambridge St. 1602 Memorial Dundas / Beverly 1603 Hospital 725 Coronation Blvd. 1616 Dundas / Chalmers 2482 Dundas / Elgin 2483 Coronation / Highland 1617 Dundas / Monroe 2484 Coronation / Blue Heron 1618 Coronation / Oriole 1619 Dundas / Main 2485 Dundas / Franklin 2486 King / Concession 1620 1621 Franklin / King / Brower F 1031 Green Gate B Bishop / Duke 1444 Bishop / Pineview 3835 Bishop / Mary 2327 690 Bishop St. N. 3877 990 Bishop St. N. 1054 N Bishop / Industrial 3851 Bishop / Hespeler Rd. 3806 Cambridge 1063 A Centre Station 519-585-7555 www.grt.ca TTY: 519-575-4608 Text: 57555 & key in your bus stop number Depart Arrive Depart P.M. A.M. Fares and schedules are subject to change without notice. Fares and schedules aresubject tochangewithout notice. Weather and roadconditionsmay causeschedule delays. 12:00 12:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 2:00 8:30 11:30 9:30 3:30 4:30 6:30 5:30 2:30 8:00 9:00 6:00 8:30 9:30 6:30 7:30 7:00 1:00 7:30 1:30 A Cambridge Centre

0:00 Station 0:00 No Saturday/Sunday/Holiday Service to Franklin / Green Gate to Franklin /Green Connection to 302 IONbus to302 Connection 12:06 12:36 10:06 10:36 11:06 3:06 4:06 5:06 6:06 2:06 8:36 11:36 9:36 3:36 4:36 6:36 5:36 2:36 9:06 8:05 6:05 9:36 8:35 7:36 6:35 1:06 7:05 7:35 1:36 B King / Bishop 12:40 10:40 12:10 10:10 11:40 6:09 8:39 3:40 4:40 9:39 5:40 2:40 6:39 6:09 8:40 9:40 7:39 6:39 7:40 11:10 1:40 3:10 4:10 5:10 2:10 8:10 9:10 7:10 1:10 C Cambridge Memorial Hospital Monday to Friday Schedule 12:43 10:43 12:13 10:13 11:43 3:44 4:44 5:44 2:44 8:43 9:43 8:41 7:43 1:43 9:41 3:14 4:14 11:13 5:14 2:14 6:41 6:41 7:41 8:13 9:13 1:13 7:13 6:11 6:11 D Delta Station 12:50 12:20 10:50 10:20 11:50 11:20 8:49 9:49 6:49 3:22 4:22 5:22 2:22 3:52 4:52 5:52 2:52 8:50 9:50 8:20 7:49 9:20 6:48 7:50 1:50 7:20 1:20 6:19 6:18 F Franklin / Green Gate

Depart Arrive Depart 12:50 12:20 10:50 10:20 11:50 11:20 5:52 4:52 8:49 6:49 3:52 5:22 4:22 9:49 3:22 2:52 2:22 9:50 8:50 6:48 9:20 8:20 7:49 1:50 7:50 6:19 1:20 7:20 6:18 F Franklin / Green Gate For the most current For listing, themost bus stop to Cambridge Centre Station Centre to Cambridge 12:56 12:26 10:56 10:26 5:58 4:58 3:58 11:56 2:58 5:28 4:28 3:28 11:26 8:55 6:55 2:28 6:25 9:55 9:56 8:56 6:54 7:55 9:26 8:26 6:24 1:56 7:56 1:26 7:26

E South Cambridge Shopping Centre 10:02 12:03 12:33 10:03 10:33 6:05 5:06 4:06 3:06 5:36 11:03 4:36 3:36 2:03 2:36 11:33 8:02 9:02 6:32 9:04 8:04 6:30 8:34 7:02 9:33 7:00 1:03 visit www.grt.ca visit 1:33 7:34 D Delta Station 10:04 12:05 12:35 10:05 10:35 5:08 4:08 3:08 11:05 5:38 4:38 2:05 8:04 3:38 9:04 11:35 6:34 2:38 6:07 9:06 8:06 7:04 8:36 9:35 6:32 1:05 1:35 7:36 7:02

C Cambridge Memorial Hospital 12:08 12:38 10:07 10:08 10:38 11:08 2:08 11:38 9:09 8:07 8:09 9:07 9:38 6:35 8:39 6:37 7:07 1:08 6:10 7:05 1:38 5:41 4:41 3:41 7:39 2:41 5:11 4:11 3:11 B King / Bishop 12:44 10:44 10:13 12:14 11:44 10:14 6:43 5:47 4:47 9:44 8:45 3:47 2:47 1:44 6:16 7:45 8:13 11:14 9:13 2:14 5:17 4:17 3:17 7:13 6:41 9:15 8:15 1:14 7:11 A Cambridge Centre Station Bus Stops

TO Cambridge TO Ainslie Centre Station Terminal

Cambridge A Ainslie Terminal 1517 1066 E Centre Station Ainslie / Walnut 1523 Bishop / Collier- 1275 Concession / Cameron 1524 MacMillan Concession / Peck 1525 1500 Bishop 1328 Concession / Scrimger 1526 Bishop / Franklin 1311 Main / Elgin 2216 Franklin / Lindsay 1011 Main / Alexander 1527 Franklin / Can-Amera 3659 Main / South D Franklin / Elgin 1491 B Cambridge 1528 Centre Franklin / Glamis 1492 Franklin / Path To The Franklin / McLaren 1529 1493 Franklin / Savage 1530 Greenway Franklin / Avenue 1494 55 Savage 1531 Franklin / Athlone 1495 111 Savage 1532 Clyde / Franklin 1496 C Dobbie / Savage 1533 Clyde / Bluerock 1497 Dobbie / Orion 1534 Clyde / Grand Dobbie / Clyde 1535 River Conservation 1498 Authority Clyde / Grand River Conservation 1536 Dobbie / Clyde 1499 Authority Dobbie / Orion 1500

Clyde / Bluerock 1537 C Dobbie / Savage 1501

Clyde / Franklin 1245 100 Savage Dr. 1502 Franklin / Clyde 1538 Franklin / Hilltop 1503 Franklin / Hilborn 1539 Franklin / Mclaren 1504 Franklin / Avenue 1540 Main / South Franklin / Robson 1541 B Cambridge 1505 D Franklin / Saginaw 1542 Centre Main / Dundas 1506

Franklin / Can-Amera 3660 Main / Elgin 1507 Franklin / Lindsay 1543 Concession / Scrimger 1508 Bishop / Franklin 1351 Concession / Peck 1509 Bishop / Cowansview 1353 Concession / Cameron 1510 Bishop / Conestoga 2005 Ainslie / Veterans 2159 Bishop / Collier 1320 Macmillan A Ainslie Terminal 1517 Cambridge 1066 E Centre Station

For the most current bus stop listing, please visit grt.ca

Fares and schedules are subject to change without notice. 51-55-555 www.grt.ca TT 51-55-0 Weather and road conditions may cause schedule delays. Text 5555 key in your bus stop number Depart Arrive Depart 12:45 10:45 12:15 10:15 6:45 4:45 3:45 5:45 2:45 11:45 7:45 8:45 6:45 9:45 8:15 1:45 4:15 3:15 6:15 5:15 2:15 7:45 11:15 7:15 6:15 8:15 9:15 1:15 7:15 A

A.M. Ainslie Terminal to Cambridge Centre Station Centre to Cambridge 12:51 12:21 10:21 10:51 8:22 8:21 6:51 4:51 4:21 3:51 3:21 6:21 7:22 5:51 5:21 11:21 2:51 2:21 11:51 7:52 7:51 7:21 6:21 9:21 6:51 8:51 9:51 1:51 1:21 B Main / South

0:00 Cambridge Centre 12:55 12:25 10:25 10:55 6:54 4:55 3:55 5:55 2:55 4:25 3:25 8:24 5:25 2:25 11:55 11:25 6:24 7:54 6:54 7:24 8:25 9:25 8:55 9:55 6:24 1:55 1:25 7:25 7:55 C Dobbie / Savage P.M. 12:02 12:32 10:02 10:32 4:02 3:02 6:02 5:02 2:02 4:32 3:32 11:02 5:32 2:32 11:32 8:02 9:02 8:01 8:32 9:32 8:31 1:02 6:31 1:32 7:32 7:01 7:31 6:31 7:01 D Franklin / Saginaw Monday toFriday Schedule 0:00 12:08 12:38 10:08 10:38 4:09 3:09 6:09 5:09 2:08 11:08 4:39 3:39 5:39 2:39 11:38 8:07 8:37 9:08 8:09 6:37 9:38 8:39 7:07 1:08 7:37 1:38 6:37 7:39 7:07

E Cambridge Centre Station Depart Arrive Depart 10:45 12:45 11:45 12:15 10:15 6:45 4:48 3:48 5:48 2:48 7:45 8:45 9:45 6:45 9:15 8:15 6:15 1:48 11:15 7:45 4:18 3:18 5:18 2:18 7:15 8:15 6:15 1:15 7:15 E Cambridge Centre Station Connection to 302 IONbus to302 Connection No Saturday/Sunday/Holiday Service 10:50 12:50 12:20 10:20 11:50 9:20 6:50 11:20 4:54 3:54 5:54 8:20 6:20 2:54 4:24 5:24 3:24 2:24 7:50 8:50 9:50 7:20 6:50 6:20 1:20 1:53 8:21 7:21 7:51 D Franklin / Elgin Terminalto Ainslie 10:56 12:56 12:26 10:26 11:56 9:26 6:56 11:26 8:26 6:26 7:56 8:56 9:56 7:26 8:27 4:01 6:01 3:01 5:01 6:27 1:59 6:57 1:26 4:31 5:31 3:31 2:31 7:27 7:57 C Dobbie / Savage 12:00 12:30 10:00 11:00 10:30 9:30 4:05 6:05 3:05 5:05 11:30 4:35 2:03 5:35 3:35 6:59 8:29 2:35 6:29 8:00 9:00 8:30 7:59 7:29 1:00 7:30 1:30 6:31 7:01 B Main / South Cambridge Centre 12:06 12:36 10:06 10:36 8:05 11:06 2:09 8:35 6:35 11:36 4:42 5:42 3:42 7:05 2:42 8:06 9:06 7:35 8:36 9:36 1:06 7:36 1:36 6:37 6:12 4:12 5:12 3:12 7:07 A Ainslie Terminal Bus Stops

A Ainslie Terminal 1518 Main / Harris 3535 Main / Bruce 2213 Main / Peck 2214 Main / Lincoln 2215 Main / Elgin 2216 Main / Alexander 1527 B Bishop / Duke 1528 Main / Franklin 2217 Franklin / Green Gate 2174 Franklin / Dundas 2175 Franklin / Path To Elliott 2218 Franklin / Morning Calm 2219 Champlain / Franklin 2220 Champlain / Carlos 2221

Lisbon Pines / Champlain 2222 Lisbon Pines / Santa Maria 2223 C Lisbon Pines / Myers 2224 Gatehouse / Mcnichol 2225 Gatehouse / Wheeler 2226 Gatehouse / Flockhart 2227

Myers / Clover 2229 Myers / Elgin 2230 Myers / Greenbrier 2231 Christopher / Myers 2233 Christopher / Tutton 2234

D Champlain / Christopher 2235 Mcdonald / Dorset 2236 Glenview / Mcdonald 2237 Glenview / Henry 2238 Glenview / Albert 2239

Albert / Ballantyne 2240 Ballantyne / Mckay 2241 Mckay / South 2242 Centre / Elliott 2243 Centre / Concession 2244 Ainslie / Veterans 2159 E Ainslie Terminal 1518

519-585-7555 www.grt.ca TTY: 519-575-4608 For the most current bus stop listing, visit www.grt.ca Text: 57555 & key in your bus stop number Monday to Friday Saturday Sunday / Holiday Schedule Schedule Schedule Depart Arrive Depart Arrive Depart Arrive Ainslie Terminal Main / South Cambridge Centre Lisbon Pines / Myers / ChristopherChamplain Ainslie Terminal Ainslie Terminal Main / South Cambridge Centre Lisbon Pines / Myers / ChristopherChamplain Ainslie Terminal Ainslie Terminal Main / South Cambridge Centre Lisbon Pines / Myers / ChristopherChamplain Ainslie Terminal A B C D A A B C D A A B C D A 6:30 6:36 6:42 6:48 6:56 7:45 7:50 7:55 8:00 8:07 9:45 9:51 9:57 10:02 10:10 7:00 7:06 7:13 7:19 7:27 8:45 8:50 8:55 9:00 9:08 10:45 10:51 10:57 11:02 11:10 7:29 7:35 7:42 7:48 7:56 9:45 9:51 9:57 10:02 10:10 11:45 11:51 11:57 12:02 12:10 7:59 8:05 8:12 8:18 8:26 10:45 10:51 10:57 11:02 11:10 12:45 12:51 12:57 1:02 1:10 8:29 8:35 8:42 8:48 8:56 11:45 11:51 11:57 12:02 12:10 1:45 1:51 1:57 2:02 2:10 9:00 9:06 9:13 9:19 9:27 12:45 12:51 12:57 1:02 1:10 2:45 2:51 2:57 3:02 3:10 9:30 9:36 9:43 9:49 9:57 1:45 1:51 1:57 2:02 2:10 3:45 3:51 3:57 4:02 4:10 10:00 10:06 10:13 10:19 10:27 2:45 2:51 2:57 3:02 3:10 4:45 4:51 4:57 5:02 5:10 10:30 10:36 10:43 10:49 10:57 3:45 3:51 3:57 4:02 4:10 5:45 5:51 5:57 6:02 6:10 11:00 11:06 11:13 11:19 11:27 4:45 4:51 4:57 5:02 5:10 11:30 11:36 11:43 11:49 11:57 5:45 5:51 5:57 6:02 6:10 12:00 12:06 12:13 12:19 12:27 6:45 6:51 6:57 7:02 7:10 12:30 12:36 12:43 12:49 12:57 7:45 7:51 7:57 8:02 8:10 1:00 1:06 1:13 1:19 1:27 8:45 8:51 8:57 9:02 9:10 1:30 1:36 1:43 1:49 1:57 2:00 2:06 2:13 2:19 2:27 2:29 2:35 2:42 2:48 2:56 2:59 3:06 3:14 3:20 3:29 3:29 3:36 3:44 3:50 3:59 3:59 4:06 4:14 4:20 4:29 4:29 4:36 4:44 4:50 4:59 4:59 5:06 5:14 5:20 5:29 5:29 5:36 5:44 5:50 5:59 5:59 6:06 6:14 6:20 6:29 6:45 6:51 6:57 7:03 7:11 7:45 7:51 7:57 8:03 8:11 8:45 8:51 8:57 9:03 9:11

Connection to 302 ION bus A.M. 0:00 Fares and schedules are subject to change without notice. Weather P.M. 0:00 and road conditions may cause schedule delays. Champlain

Route 63 EasyGO makes taking Effective: January 7, 2019 transit easy

1. Online Trip Planner: www.grt.ca 2. Next Bus Text: get information on the next bus times sent to your Alison B Ave. phone (does not apply to Flex Stops) Text 57555 + (4 digit bus stop #) Ainslie 3. Next Bus Call: call to hear the next Terminal illtop Dr. bus times for your stop (does not apply to Flex Stops) Chalmers St. .

A Elgin St. . 519-585-7555 Rich Ave. ranklin Blvd. ain St.

4. EasyGO Mobile: GRT’s official ollock Ave. mobile application for real-time bus

departure information Ainslie St.

Available on Android, Blackberry, Concession St. ain St. Dundas St. iOS & Windows App Stores Elliott St. South St. 5. EasyGO Real-Time Desktop Map: C plan trips by seeing and click on Elgin St. different routes and stops www.grt.ca Christopher Dr. D Chalmers St. S. Champlain Blvd.

ap egend Route Direction

Cross Street

Time oint Transit Terminal

519-585-7555 www.grt.ca TTY: 519-575-4608 For the most current bus stop listing, visit www.grt.ca Text: 57555 & key in your bus stop number Saturday Schedule Weekday Schedule (No Sunday/Holiday Service)

Ainslie Terminal (Depart) Alison / Elgin South Cambridge Shopping Centre Champlain / Christopher Ainslie Terminal (Arrive) Ainslie Terminal (Depart) Alison / Elgin South Cambridge Shopping Centre Champlain / Christopher Ainslie Terminal (Arrive) A B C D A A B C D A 5:58 6:04 6:10 6:30 6:36 6:42 6:15 6:22 6:28 6:34 6:40 6:45 6:52 6:58 7:04 7:10 6:45 6:52 6:58 7:04 7:10 7:15 7:22 7:28 7:34 7:40 7:15 7:22 7:28 7:34 7:40 7:45 7:52 7:58 8:04 8:10 7:45 7:52 7:58 8:04 8:10 8:15 8:22 8:28 8:34 8:40 8:15 8:22 8:28 8:34 8:40 8:45 8:52 8:58 9:04 9:10 8:45 8:52 8:58 9:04 9:10 9:15 9:22 9:28 9:34 9:40 9:15 9:22 9:28 9:34 9:40 9:45 9:52 9:58 10:04 10:10 9:45 9:52 9:58 10:04 10:10 10:15 10:22 10:28 10:34 10:40 10:15 10:22 10:28 10:34 10:40 10:45 10:52 10:58 11:04 11:10 10:45 10:52 10:58 11:04 11:10 11:15 11:22 11:28 11:34 11:40 11:15 11:22 11:28 11:34 11:40 11:45 11:52 11:58 12:04 12:10 11:45 11:52 11:58 12:04 12:10 12:15 12:22 12:28 12:34 12:40 12:15 12:22 12:28 12:34 12:40 12:45 12:52 12:58 1:04 1:10 12:45 12:52 12:58 1:04 1:10 1:15 1:22 1:28 1:34 1:40 1:15 1:22 1:28 1:34 1:40 1:45 1:52 1:58 2:04 2:10 1:45 1:52 1:58 2:04 2:10 2:15 2:22 2:28 2:34 2:40 2:15 2:22 2:28 2:34 2:40 2:45 2:52 2:58 3:04 3:10 2:45 2:53 3:00 3:06 3:12 3:15 3:22 3:28 3:34 3:40 3:15 3:23 3:30 3:36 3:42 3:45 3:52 3:58 4:04 4:10 3:45 3:53 4:00 4:06 4:12 4:15 4:22 4:28 4:34 4:40 4:15 4:23 4:30 4:36 4:42 4:45 4:52 4:58 5:04 5:10 4:45 4:53 5:00 5:06 5:12 5:15 5:22 5:28 5:34 5:40 5:15 5:23 5:30 5:36 5:42 5:45 5:52 5:58 6:04 6:10 5:45 5:53 6:00 6:05 6:11 6:15 6:22 6:28 6:33 6:39 6:15 6:22 6:28 6:33 6:39 7:15 7:22 7:28 7:33 7:39 6:45 6:52 6:58 7:03 7:09 8:15 8:22 8:28 8:33 8:39 7:15 7:22 7:28 7:33 7:39 9:15 9:22 9:28 9:33 9:39 7:45 7:52 7:58 8:03 8:09 8:15 8:22 8:28 8:33 8:39 8:45 8:52 8:58 9:03 9:09 9:15 9:22 9:28 9:33 9:39 9:45 9:52 9:58 10:03 10:09

Fares and schedules are subject to change without notice. Weather and road conditions may cause schedule delays. PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Appendix D TRAFFIC DATA July 9, 2020

Appendix D TRAFFIC DATA

D.1

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Morning Peak Diagram From: 7:30 AM From: 7:30 AM To: 10:30 AM To: 8:30 AM

North Leg Total: 1,846 % Trks 7% 9% 14% Heavys 35 East Leg Total: 506 North Entering: 659 Heavys 14 20 5 39 Trucks 8 East Entering: 208 North Peds: 0 Trucks 1 12 4 17 Cars 1,144 East Peds: 0 Peds Cross: Cars 213 334 56 603 Total 1,187 Peds Cross: Total 228 366 65 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 18 1 455 474 32 25 1 6 22% 142 138 0 4 3% N 34 28 0 6 18% 191 1 16 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 4% 11 2 325 338 4% 7 0 165 172 0% 0 0 39 39 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 18 2 529 279 4 15 298 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 104 817 61 Peds Cross: West Peds: 0 Heavys 26 Cars 104 794 58 956 South Peds: 0 West Entering: 549 Trucks 12 Trucks 0 5 0 5 South Entering: 982 West leg Total: 1,023 Cars 401 Heavys 0 18 3 21 South leg Total: 1,421 Total 439 % Trks 0% 3% 5%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during morning peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 2,398

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 549 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Mid-day Peak Diagram From: 12:00 PM From: 12:00 PM To: 2:00 PM To: 1:00 PM

North Leg Total: 1,683 % Trks 4% 5% 13% Heavys 24 East Leg Total: 367 North Entering: 874 Heavys 13 21 6 40 Trucks 13 East Entering: 162 North Peds: 0 Trucks 0 3 4 7 Cars 772 East Peds: 0 Peds Cross: Cars 288 474 65 827 Total 809 Peds Cross: Total 301 498 75 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 15 2 460 477 38 36 1 1 5% 97 93 2 2 4% N 27 26 0 1 4% 155 3 4 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 4% 7 4 234 245 2% 2 0 91 93 0% 0 0 57 57 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 9 4 382 190 4 11 205 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 79 526 37 Peds Cross: West Peds: 0 Heavys 22 Cars 79 502 34 615 South Peds: 0 West Entering: 395 Trucks 3 Trucks 0 8 0 8 South Entering: 642 West leg Total: 872 Cars 557 Heavys 0 16 3 19 South leg Total: 1,224 Total 582 % Trks 0% 5% 8%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during mid-day peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 2,073

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 395 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Diagram From: 3:00 PM From: 4:30 PM To: 6:00 PM To: 5:30 PM

North Leg Total: 1,827 % Trks 2% 2% 15% Heavys 17 East Leg Total: 628 North Entering: 960 Heavys 6 8 4 18 Trucks 5 East Entering: 382 North Peds: 0 Trucks 0 3 1 4 Cars 845 East Peds: 0 Peds Cross: Cars 262 647 29 938 Total 867 Peds Cross: Total 268 658 34 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 9 0 651 660 41 38 0 3 7% 273 270 0 3 1% N 68 66 0 2 3% 374 0 8 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 2% 4 2 244 250 4% 5 1 154 160 0% 0 0 131 131 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 9 3 529 234 2 10 246 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 119 576 52 Peds Cross: West Peds: 0 Heavys 10 Cars 119 563 51 733 South Peds: 0 West Entering: 541 Trucks 3 Trucks 0 3 0 3 South Entering: 747 West leg Total: 1,201 Cars 844 Heavys 0 10 1 11 South leg Total: 1,604 Total 857 % Trks 0% 2% 2%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during afternoon peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Example 1: Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 2,630

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 541 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Total Count Diagram

Municipality: Cambridge Weather conditions: Intersection: Franklin Blvd & Main St Sunny GeoID: 13955 Control: Non Signalized Count Date: Thursday, 12-Oct-17 Major Road: Franklin Blvd Person(s) who counted: AT20-JK North Leg Total: 13,362 East Leg Total: 3,476 North Entering: 6,099 % Trks 4% 4% 14% Heavys 246 East Entering: 1,738 North Peds: 0 Heavys 80 112 44 236 Trucks 79 East Peds: 0 Peds Cross: Trucks 6 51 13 70 Cars 6,938 Peds Cross: Bicycles Entering: 0 Cars 1,901 3,542 350 5,793 Total 7,263 Bicycles Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0 Total 1,987 3,705 407 Buggies Entering: 0 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 112 10 3,742 3,864 293 263 3 27 10% 1,143 1,113 4 26 3% N 302 279 3 20 8% 1,655 10 73 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 4% 72 19 2,061 2,152 4% 39 3 919 961 1% 5 0 600 605 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 116 22 3,580 1,614 20 104 1,738 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 734 4,818 370 Peds Cross: West Peds: 0 Heavys 137 Cars 728 4,614 345 5,687 South Peds: 0 West Entering: 3,718 Trucks 54 Trucks 0 57 4 61 South Entering: 5,922 West leg Total: 7,582 Cars 4,421 Heavys 6 147 21 174 South leg Total: 10,534 Bicycles Entering: 0 Total 4,612 % Trks 1% 4% 7% Bicycles Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0 Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection, add all leg totals entering. Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 17,477 Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 3,718

Notes: None REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Estimated Daily Traffic Total Factor = Monthly Factor 1 x Daily Factor 1 x 24 Hour Factor 1.74 = 1.740000

North Leg Total: 23,250 % Trks 4% 4% 14% Heavys 428 East Leg Total: 6,048 North Entering: 10,612 Heavys 139 195 77 411 Trucks 137 East Entering: 3,024 North Peds: N/A Trucks 10 89 23 122 Cars 12,072 East Peds: N/A Peds Cross: Cars 3,308 6,163 609 10,080 Total 12638 Peds Cross: Total 3,457 6,447 708 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 195 17 6,511 6,723 510 458 5 47 10% 1,989 1,937 7 45 3% N 525 485 5 35 8% 2,880 17 127 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 4% 125 33 3,586 3,744 4% 68 5 1,599 1,672 1% 9 0 1,044 1,053 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 202 38 6,229 2,808 35 181 3,024 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 1,277 8,383 644 Peds Cross: West Peds: N/A Heavys 238 Cars 1,267 8,028 600 9,895 South Peds: N/A West Entering: 6,469 Trucks 94 Trucks 0 99 7 106 South Entering: 10,304 West leg Total: 13,193 Cars 7,693 Heavys 10 256 37 303 South leg Total: 18,329 Total 8,025 % Trks 1% 4% 7%

Comments To determine the EDT (Estimated Daily Traffic), add all four leg totals and divide by two. This will give you the approximate number of vehicles entering and exiting the intersection in a 24-hour period

Example: (West leg total + South leg total + East leg total + North leg total) EDT = 30,410 2 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Peak Hour Factor By Movement

Municipality: Cambridge Weather conditions: Intersection: Franklin Blvd & Main St Sunny GeoID: 13955 Control: Non Signalized Count Date: Thursday, 12-Oct-17 Major Road: Franklin Blvd Person(s) who counted: AT20-JK North Approach PHF East Approach PHF AM Peak: 0.93 AM Peak: 0.87 Mid-day Peak: 0.90 Movement Mid-day Peak: 0.83 PM Peak: 0.99 PM 0.78 0.90 0.57 PM Peak: 0.85 MID 0.89 0.85 0.63 AM 0.90 0.90 0.74 Franklin Blvd AM AM Peak Hour MID Mid-day Peak Hour AM MID PM PM PM Peak Hour 0.57 0.79 0.79 N 0.87 0.81 0.79

0.77 0.68 0.71 Movement Main St W E

S PM MID AM Main St 0.74 0.88 0.82 0.85 0.78 0.83

Movement 0.80 0.95 0.89

Franklin Blvd West Approach PHF 0.90 0.84 0.85 AM South Approach PHF AM Peak: 0.87 0.79 0.96 0.71 MID AM Peak: 0.86 Mid-day Peak: 0.91 0.90 0.95 0.65 PM Mid-day Peak: 0.95 PM Peak: 0.90 Movement PM Peak: 0.91

Comments Intersection: Franklin Blvd & Main St Intersection Control: Non Signalized GeoID: 13955 Date: Thursday, 12-Oct-17 Municipality: Cambridge Name: AT20-JK Major Road: Franklin Blvd Weather: Sunny

EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND

Approach Control Yield Control Yield Control Yield Control Yield Control Movement LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT Approach Lanes > 2 < > 2 < LANES 0 LANES LANES 1 1 TOTAL TOTAL HOUR 7:30 to 7:45 65 52 10 4 36 12 24 243 18 22 91 47 624 7:45 to 8:00 103 48 7 11 30 1 27 209 17 13 80 62 608 8:00 to 8:15 83 38 11 8 41 5 24 175 18 19 102 56 580 8:15 to 8:30 87 34 11 11 35 14 29 190 8 11 93 63 586 2,398 8:30 to 8:45 75 30 10 6 31 9 22 222 9 15 74 54 557 2,331 8:45 to 9:00 68 21 11 11 28 8 28 158 14 14 104 69 534 2,257 9:00 to 9:15 49 19 18 5 23 9 29 148 3 17 91 58 469 2,146 9:15 to 9:30 70 32 19 3 33 17 17 127 16 20 86 39 479 2,039 9:30 to 9:45 63 18 27 6 21 12 20 155 8 25 96 47 498 1,980 9:45 to 10:00 61 18 15 8 25 11 20 170 15 15 82 51 491 1,937 10:00 to 10:15 57 16 21 7 23 10 8 149 8 11 105 50 465 1,933 10:15 to 10:30 60 28 15 7 15 15 9 141 6 13 87 47 443 1,897 AM Peak Hour 7:30 to 8:30 338 172 39 34 142 32 104 817 61 65 366 228 2,398 # of trucks in peak 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 4 12 1 25 # of heavies in peak 11 7 0 6 4 6 0 18 3 5 20 14 94 % heavies (Total) 4% 4% 0% 18% 3% 22% 0% 3% 5% 14% 9% 7% 5%

12:00 to 12:15 69 22 12 10 30 9 19 129 7 22 146 74 549 12:15 to 12:30 42 17 15 2 23 7 21 135 13 30 131 72 508 12:30 to 12:45 70 24 15 6 24 10 25 125 7 8 127 85 526 12:45 to 13:00 64 30 15 9 20 12 14 137 10 15 94 70 490 2,073 13:00 to 13:15 60 19 8 11 23 6 20 126 12 14 102 50 451 1,975 13:15 to 13:30 56 22 13 9 22 5 26 132 8 18 95 54 460 1,927 13:30 to 13:45 83 20 12 11 19 11 16 118 8 14 103 50 465 1,866 13:45 to 14:00 64 20 10 10 26 4 19 122 17 3 87 67 449 1,825 Midday Peak Hour 12:00 to 13:00 245 93 57 27 97 38 79 526 37 75 498 301 2,073 # of trucks in peak 4 0 0 0 2 1 0 8 0 4 3 0 22 # of heavies in peak 7 2 0 1 2 1 0 16 3 6 21 13 72 % heavies (Total) 4% 2% 0% 4% 4% 5% 0% 5% 8% 13% 5% 4% 5%

15:00 to 15:15 68 22 26 8 22 5 28 144 9 9 83 55 479 15:15 to 15:30 56 24 20 8 23 8 26 137 8 7 144 93 554 15:30 to 15:45 69 28 21 11 24 6 30 139 17 10 134 80 569 15:45 to 16:00 75 30 30 8 46 12 21 154 9 6 181 69 641 2,243 16:00 to 16:15 69 43 19 11 34 8 24 124 16 10 134 76 568 2,332 16:15 to 16:30 76 50 21 9 43 9 21 127 10 2 120 74 562 2,340 16:30 to 16:45 43 37 31 16 53 11 24 143 14 15 141 86 614 2,385 16:45 to 17:00 60 44 39 24 64 10 30 131 8 8 175 57 650 2,394 17:00 to 17:15 84 47 20 14 70 7 33 152 20 7 183 53 690 2,516 17:15 to 17:30 63 32 41 14 86 13 32 150 10 4 159 72 676 2,630 17:30 to 17:45 74 36 20 10 84 11 24 155 13 4 119 48 598 2,614 17:45 to 18:00 66 40 42 14 66 6 24 151 14 6 156 59 644 2,608 PM Peak Hour 16:30 to 17:30 250 160 131 68 273 41 119 576 52 34 658 268 2,630 # of trucks in peak 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 10 # of heavies in peak 4 5 0 2 3 3 0 10 1 4 8 6 46 % heavies (Total) 2% 4% 0% 3% 1% 7% 0% 2% 2% 15% 2% 2% 2% Intersection: Franklin Blvd & Main St Intersection Control: Non Signalized GeoID: 13955 Date: Thursday, 12-Oct-17 Municipality: Cambridge Name: AT20-JK Major Road: Franklin Blvd Weather: Sunny

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

Crossing Approach Time East App. West App. North App. South App. TOTAL TOTAL HOUR 7:30 to 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 to 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 to 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 to 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 to 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 to 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 to 9:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:15 to 9:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 to 9:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 to 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 to 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 to 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM Peak Hour 7:30 to 8:30 0 0 0 0 0

12:00 to 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 to 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 to 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 to 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 to 13:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 to 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 to 13:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 to 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midday Peak Hour 12:00 to 13:00 0 0 0 0 0

15:00 to 15:15 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 to 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 to 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 to 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 to 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 to 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 to 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 to 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 to 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 to 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 to 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 to 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM Peak Hour 16:30 to 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Morning Peak Diagram From: 7:30 AM From: 8:15 AM To: 10:30 AM To: 9:15 AM

North Leg Total: 1,023 % Trks 15% 8% 7% Heavys 23 East Leg Total: 946 North Entering: 326 Heavys 3 12 5 20 Trucks 3 East Entering: 472 North Peds: 6 Trucks 1 6 1 8 Cars 671 East Peds: 7 Peds Cross: Cars 23 199 76 298 Total 697 Peds Cross: Total 27 217 82 Dundas St Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 35 6 409 450 150 146 0 4 3% 276 254 4 18 8% N 46 45 1 0 2% 445 5 22 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 3% 3 0 97 100 7% 20 3 320 343 6% 9 3 187 199 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 32 6 604 445 4 25 474 Dundas St

Peds Cross: Total 147 447 49 Peds Cross: West Peds: 1 Heavys 21 Cars 132 428 49 609 South Peds: 8 West Entering: 642 Trucks 10 Trucks 1 3 0 4 South Entering: 643 West leg Total: 1,092 Cars 431 Heavys 14 16 0 30 South leg Total: 1,105 Total 462 % Trks 10% 4% 0%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during morning peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 2,083

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 642 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Mid-day Peak Diagram From: 12:00 PM From: 12:00 PM To: 2:00 PM To: 1:00 PM

North Leg Total: 1,135 % Trks 2% 6% 1% Heavys 13 East Leg Total: 1,120 North Entering: 551 Heavys 0 18 1 19 Trucks 3 East Entering: 601 North Peds: 3 Trucks 1 1 0 2 Cars 568 East Peds: 12 Peds Cross: Cars 41 322 167 530 Total 584 Peds Cross: Total 42 341 168 Dundas St Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 32 4 479 515 208 206 0 2 1% 334 306 3 25 8% N 59 57 0 2 3% 569 3 29 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 2% 2 0 108 110 9% 25 2 286 313 5% 9 0 165 174 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 36 2 559 491 2 26 519 Dundas St

Peds Cross: Total 139 266 38 Peds Cross: West Peds: 1 Heavys 29 Cars 132 254 38 424 South Peds: 12 West Entering: 597 Trucks 1 Trucks 0 3 0 3 South Entering: 443 West leg Total: 1,112 Cars 544 Heavys 7 9 0 16 South leg Total: 1,017 Total 574 % Trks 5% 5% 0%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during mid-day peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 2,192

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 597 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Diagram From: 3:00 PM From: 4:45 PM To: 6:00 PM To: 5:45 PM

North Leg Total: 1,392 % Trks 0% 2% 2% Heavys 6 East Leg Total: 1,375 North Entering: 698 Heavys 0 10 2 12 Trucks 4 East Entering: 778 North Peds: 8 Trucks 0 0 1 1 Cars 684 East Peds: 8 Peds Cross: Cars 59 469 157 685 Total 694 Peds Cross: Total 59 479 160 Dundas St Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 19 1 752 772 195 192 1 2 2% 491 481 1 9 2% N 92 91 1 0 1% 764 3 11 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 1% 1 0 115 116 3% 11 2 359 372 2% 4 0 258 262 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 16 2 732 580 4 13 597 Dundas St

Peds Cross: Total 222 383 65 Peds Cross: West Peds: 1 Heavys 14 Cars 212 377 64 653 South Peds: 10 West Entering: 750 Trucks 1 Trucks 0 3 1 4 South Entering: 670 West leg Total: 1,522 Cars 818 Heavys 10 3 0 13 South leg Total: 1,503 Total 833 % Trks 5% 2% 2%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during afternoon peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Example 1: Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 2,896

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 750 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Total Count Diagram

Municipality: Cambridge Weather conditions: Intersection: Main St & Dundas St Cloudy GeoID: 13957 Control: Signalized Count Date: Saturday, 19-Oct-19 Major Road: Main St Person(s) who counted: AT15-EZ North Leg Total: 9,126 East Leg Total: 8,905 North Entering: 4,057 % Trks 3% 4% 3% Heavys 121 East Entering: 4,751 North Peds: 57 Heavys 6 104 22 132 Trucks 34 East Peds: 67 Peds Cross: Trucks 3 13 9 25 Cars 4,914 Peds Cross: Bicycles Entering: 1 Cars 330 2,579 991 3,900 Total 5,069 Bicycles Entering: 1 Buggies Entering: 0 Total 339 2,696 1,022 Buggies Entering: 0 Dundas St Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 241 33 4,304 4,578 1,352 1,323 7 22 2% 2,893 2,737 20 136 5% N 506 497 4 5 2% 4,557 31 163 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 2% 15 1 838 854 7% 179 17 2,512 2,708 4% 61 6 1,455 1,522 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 255 24 4,805 3,916 30 208 4,154 Dundas St

Peds Cross: Total 1,346 2,863 424 Peds Cross: West Peds: 24 Heavys 170 Cars 1,237 2,753 413 4,403 South Peds: 73 West Entering: 5,084 Trucks 23 Trucks 10 26 4 40 South Entering: 4,633 West leg Total: 9,662 Cars 4,531 Heavys 99 84 7 190 South leg Total: 9,357 Bicycles Entering: 1 Total 4,724 % Trks 8% 4% 3% Bicycles Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0 Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection, add all leg totals entering. Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 18,525 Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 5,084

Notes: None REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Estimated Daily Traffic Total Factor = Monthly Factor 1 x Daily Factor 1 x 24 Hour Factor 1.74 = 1.740000

North Leg Total: 15,879 % Trks 3% 4% 3% Heavys 211 East Leg Total: 15,495 North Entering: 7,059 Heavys 10 181 38 230 Trucks 59 East Entering: 8,267 North Peds: N/A Trucks 5 23 16 44 Cars 8,550 East Peds: N/A Peds Cross: Cars 574 4,487 1,724 6,786 Total 8820 Peds Cross: Total 590 4,691 1,778 Dundas St Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 419 57 7,489 7,966 2,352 2,302 12 38 2% 5,034 4,762 35 237 5% N 880 865 7 9 2% 7,929 54 284 Main St W E Main St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 2% 26 2 1,458 1,486 7% 311 30 4,371 4,712 4% 106 10 2,532 2,648 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 444 42 8,361 6,814 52 362 7,228 Dundas St

Peds Cross: Total 2,342 4,982 738 Peds Cross: West Peds: N/A Heavys 296 Cars 2,152 4,790 719 7,661 South Peds: N/A West Entering: 8,846 Trucks 40 Trucks 17 45 7 70 South Entering: 8,061 West leg Total: 16,812 Cars 7,884 Heavys 172 146 12 331 South leg Total: 16,281 Total 8,220 % Trks 8% 4% 3%

Example: (West leg total + South leg total + East leg total + North leg total) EDT = 32,234 2 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Peak Hour Factor By Movement

Municipality: Cambridge Weather conditions: Intersection: Main St & Dundas St Cloudy GeoID: 13957 Control: Signalized Count Date: Saturday, 19-Oct-19 Major Road: Main St Person(s) who counted: AT15-EZ North Approach PHF East Approach PHF AM Peak: 0.93 AM Peak: 0.92 Mid-day Peak: 0.85 Movement Mid-day Peak: 0.95 PM Peak: 0.91 PM 0.64 0.93 0.91 PM Peak: 0.96 MID 0.66 0.72 0.93 AM 0.56 0.88 0.71 Dundas St AM AM Peak Hour MID Mid-day Peak Hour AM MID PM PM PM Peak Hour 0.87 0.93 0.96 N 0.84 0.95 0.92

0.82 0.78 0.82 Movement Main St W E

S PM MID AM Main St 0.94 0.83 0.86 0.93 0.85 0.92

Movement 0.80 0.87 0.83

Dundas St West Approach PHF 0.75 0.86 0.77 AM South Approach PHF AM Peak: 0.91 0.94 0.92 0.86 MID AM Peak: 0.96 Mid-day Peak: 0.91 0.83 0.88 0.74 PM Mid-day Peak: 0.96 PM Peak: 0.89 Movement PM Peak: 0.97

Comments Intersection: Main St & Dundas St Intersection Control: Signalized GeoID: 13957 Date: Saturday, 19-Oct-19 Municipality: Cambridge Name: AT15-EZ Major Road: Main St Weather: Cloudy

EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND

Approach Control Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Movement LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT Approach Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 < 1 2 < 1 2 1 TOTAL TOTAL HOUR 7:30 to 7:45 15 95 34 5 42 23 39 130 14 7 43 2 449 7:45 to 8:00 26 98 31 10 69 25 29 116 6 28 61 5 504 8:00 to 8:15 21 98 46 12 76 25 32 112 14 22 51 3 512 8:15 to 8:30 29 88 60 14 67 43 49 102 12 22 51 3 540 2,005 8:30 to 8:45 28 72 39 10 62 39 22 130 16 29 52 7 506 2,062 8:45 to 9:00 24 90 45 13 65 31 32 113 14 17 52 12 508 2,066 9:00 to 9:15 19 93 55 9 82 37 44 102 7 14 62 5 529 2,083 9:15 to 9:30 24 71 48 9 66 27 35 89 11 17 80 7 484 2,027 9:30 to 9:45 27 79 47 16 72 39 44 78 14 28 60 16 520 2,041 9:45 to 10:00 29 78 42 15 72 30 25 82 11 26 49 7 466 1,999 10:00 to 10:15 25 63 38 6 73 41 29 65 10 18 58 6 432 1,902 10:15 to 10:30 28 65 45 7 61 31 37 69 12 32 68 3 458 1,876 AM Peak Hour 8:15 to 9:15 100 343 199 46 276 150 147 447 49 82 217 27 2,083 # of trucks in peak 0 3 3 1 4 0 1 3 0 1 6 1 23 # of heavies in peak 3 20 9 0 18 4 14 16 0 5 12 3 104 % heavies (Total) 3% 7% 6% 2% 8% 3% 10% 4% 0% 7% 8% 15% 6%

12:00 to 12:15 26 92 46 19 85 54 35 58 11 38 118 7 589 12:15 to 12:30 33 67 48 13 74 46 37 68 10 44 75 10 525 12:30 to 12:45 31 68 30 12 88 52 36 72 7 41 74 9 520 12:45 to 13:00 20 86 50 15 87 56 31 68 10 45 74 16 558 2,192 13:00 to 13:15 27 80 36 15 85 53 45 75 11 27 68 23 545 2,148 13:15 to 13:30 26 90 38 14 88 39 33 83 15 26 78 10 540 2,163 13:30 to 13:45 25 96 47 12 71 51 29 71 14 29 60 10 515 2,158 13:45 to 14:00 24 75 34 22 72 36 36 71 19 37 82 17 525 2,125 Midday Peak Hour 12:00 to 13:00 110 313 174 59 334 208 139 266 38 168 341 42 2,192 # of trucks in peak 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 10 # of heavies in peak 2 25 9 2 25 2 7 9 0 1 18 0 100 % heavies (Total) 2% 9% 5% 3% 8% 1% 5% 5% 0% 1% 6% 2% 5%

15:00 to 15:15 35 85 44 13 102 38 46 85 12 39 111 9 619 15:15 to 15:30 32 90 54 17 119 48 56 75 19 28 92 14 644 15:30 to 15:45 28 83 48 18 141 57 51 78 15 41 122 22 704 15:45 to 16:00 31 92 57 23 107 49 45 109 24 35 99 8 679 2,646 16:00 to 16:15 25 98 49 19 116 34 64 88 8 50 122 15 688 2,715 16:15 to 16:30 18 83 35 19 127 55 45 110 14 45 124 10 685 2,756 16:30 to 16:45 27 77 56 36 105 52 47 101 8 40 119 11 679 2,731 16:45 to 17:00 28 100 82 28 117 48 45 109 16 44 120 13 750 2,802 17:00 to 17:15 27 80 68 22 133 47 51 109 13 33 107 8 698 2,812 17:15 to 17:30 30 94 53 14 116 51 59 75 22 39 129 23 705 2,832 17:30 to 17:45 31 98 59 28 125 49 67 90 14 44 123 15 743 2,896 17:45 to 18:00 35 84 58 21 128 46 71 80 21 37 112 13 706 2,852 PM Peak Hour 16:45 to 17:45 116 372 262 92 491 195 222 383 65 160 479 59 2,896 # of trucks in peak 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 10 # of heavies in peak 1 11 4 0 9 2 10 3 0 2 10 0 52 % heavies (Total) 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% Intersection: Main St & Dundas St Intersection Control: Signalized GeoID: 13957 Date: Saturday, 19-Oct-19 Municipality: Cambridge Name: AT15-EZ Major Road: Main St Weather: Cloudy

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

Crossing Approach Time East App. West App. North App. South App. TOTAL TOTAL HOUR 7:30 to 7:45 0 0 1 0 1 7:45 to 8:00 2 0 0 0 2 8:00 to 8:15 2 0 4 0 6 8:15 to 8:30 2 1 3 1 7 16 8:30 to 8:45 1 0 1 3 5 20 8:45 to 9:00 2 0 2 4 8 26 9:00 to 9:15 2 0 0 0 2 22 9:15 to 9:30 0 1 1 0 2 17 9:30 to 9:45 0 1 2 1 4 16 9:45 to 10:00 4 0 2 4 10 18 10:00 to 10:15 1 0 3 0 4 20 10:15 to 10:30 0 2 5 4 11 29 AM Peak Hour 62 8:15 to 9:15 7 1 6 8 22

12:00 to 12:15 2 1 2 1 6 12:15 to 12:30 1 0 0 3 4 12:30 to 12:45 5 0 1 1 7 12:45 to 13:00 4 0 0 7 11 28 13:00 to 13:15 3 3 7 1 14 36 13:15 to 13:30 6 1 2 4 13 45 13:30 to 13:45 4 0 2 1 7 45 13:45 to 14:00 0 1 0 1 2 36 Midday Peak Hour 64 12:00 to 13:00 12 1 3 12 28

15:00 to 15:15 2 2 2 0 6 15:15 to 15:30 1 2 1 7 11 15:30 to 15:45 1 0 3 0 4 15:45 to 16:00 0 2 1 4 7 28 16:00 to 16:15 3 1 0 2 6 28 16:15 to 16:30 4 4 2 4 14 31 16:30 to 16:45 5 1 0 6 12 39 16:45 to 17:00 2 0 1 7 10 42 17:00 to 17:15 3 0 2 1 6 42 17:15 to 17:30 3 1 3 1 8 36 17:30 to 17:45 0 0 2 1 3 27 17:45 to 18:00 2 0 2 4 8 25 PM Peak Hour 95 16:45 to 17:45 8 1 8 10 27 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Morning Peak Diagram From: 7:30 AM From: 7:45 AM To: 10:30 AM To: 8:45 AM

North Leg Total: 1,275 % Trks 21% 8% 17% Heavys 27 East Leg Total: 1,445 North Entering: 480 Heavys 4 16 22 42 Trucks 10 East Entering: 839 North Peds: 0 Trucks 0 2 19 21 Cars 758 East Peds: 0 Peds Cross: Cars 15 198 204 417 Total 795 Peds Cross: Total 19 216 245 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 21 8 668 697 270 253 7 10 6% 540 516 8 16 4% N 29 24 1 4 17% 793 16 30 Dundas St W E Dundas St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 9% 4 0 42 46 8% 19 8 299 326 11% 3 1 32 36 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 26 9 373 538 27 41 606 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 138 479 35 Peds Cross: West Peds: 1 Heavys 23 Cars 137 463 35 635 South Peds: 0 West Entering: 408 Trucks 4 Trucks 0 3 0 3 South Entering: 652 West leg Total: 1,105 Cars 254 Heavys 1 13 0 14 South leg Total: 933 Total 281 % Trks 1% 3% 0%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during morning peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 2,379

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 408 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Mid-day Peak Diagram From: 12:00 PM From: 12:30 PM To: 2:00 PM To: 1:30 PM

North Leg Total: 1,164 % Trks 11% 5% 7% Heavys 16 East Leg Total: 1,247 North Entering: 665 Heavys 4 10 15 29 Trucks 8 East Entering: 586 North Peds: 0 Trucks 1 6 6 13 Cars 475 East Peds: 0 Peds Cross: Cars 40 282 301 623 Total 499 Peds Cross: Total 45 298 322 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 24 12 553 589 152 138 4 10 9% 395 367 10 18 7% N 39 39 0 0 0% 544 14 28 Dundas St W E Dundas St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 0% 0 0 101 101 9% 24 6 287 317 6% 4 1 83 88 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 28 7 471 609 12 40 661 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 149 246 22 Peds Cross: West Peds: 0 Heavys 14 Cars 146 236 21 403 South Peds: 0 West Entering: 506 Trucks 7 Trucks 1 4 0 5 South Entering: 417 West leg Total: 1,095 Cars 404 Heavys 2 6 1 9 South leg Total: 842 Total 425 % Trks 2% 4% 5%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during mid-day peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 2,174

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 506 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Diagram From: 3:00 PM From: 4:30 PM To: 6:00 PM To: 5:30 PM

North Leg Total: 1,712 % Trks 10% 1% 2% Heavys 18 East Leg Total: 1,869 North Entering: 1,131 Heavys 2 3 7 12 Trucks 5 East Entering: 712 North Peds: 0 Trucks 0 4 3 7 Cars 558 East Peds: 0 Peds Cross: Cars 19 598 495 1,112 Total 581 Peds Cross: Total 21 605 505 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 20 1 680 701 173 159 4 10 8% 513 495 1 17 4% N 26 25 0 1 4% 679 5 28 Dundas St W E Dundas St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 1% 1 0 81 82 2% 6 5 611 622 3% 2 2 131 135 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 9 7 823 1,135 9 13 1,157 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 167 326 30 Peds Cross: West Peds: 1 Heavys 6 Cars 166 318 29 513 South Peds: 0 West Entering: 839 Trucks 6 Trucks 0 1 1 2 South Entering: 523 West leg Total: 1,540 Cars 754 Heavys 1 7 0 8 South leg Total: 1,289 Total 766 % Trks 1% 2% 3%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during afternoon peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Example 1: Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 3,205

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 839 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Total Count Diagram

Municipality: Cambridge Weather conditions: Intersection: Dundas St & Franklin Blvd Cloudy GeoID: 14593 Control: Non Signalized Count Date: Wednesday, 19-Sep-18 Major Road: Franklin Blvd Person(s) who counted: AT06-NS North Leg Total: 10,504 East Leg Total: 11,230 North Entering: 5,863 % Trks 14% 4% 5% Heavys 169 East Entering: 5,209 North Peds: 1 Heavys 27 84 86 197 Trucks 79 East Peds: 2 Peds Cross: Trucks 4 32 57 93 Cars 4,393 Peds Cross: Bicycles Entering: 1 Cars 186 2,804 2,583 5,573 Total 4,641 Bicycles Entering: 2 Buggies Entering: 0 Total 217 2,920 2,726 Buggies Entering: 0 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 173 64 4,752 4,989 1,464 1,327 49 88 9% 3,528 3,339 58 131 5% N 217 206 4 7 5% 4,872 111 226 Dundas St W E Dundas St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 2% 8 4 595 607 7% 140 63 2,884 3,087 4% 19 6 680 705 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 167 73 4,159 5,666 123 232 6,021 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 1,244 2,570 208 Peds Cross: West Peds: 12 Heavys 110 Cars 1,227 2,471 199 3,897 South Peds: 3 West Entering: 4,399 Trucks 42 Trucks 2 26 3 31 South Entering: 4,022 West leg Total: 9,388 Cars 3,690 Heavys 15 73 6 94 South leg Total: 7,864 Bicycles Entering: 2 Total 3,842 % Trks 1% 4% 4% Bicycles Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0 Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection, add all leg totals entering. Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 19,493 Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 4,399

Notes: None REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Estimated Daily Traffic Total Factor = Monthly Factor 1 x Daily Factor 1 x 24 Hour Factor 1.74 = 1.740000

North Leg Total: 18,277 % Trks 14% 4% 5% Heavys 294 East Leg Total: 19,540 North Entering: 10,202 Heavys 47 146 150 343 Trucks 137 East Entering: 9,064 North Peds: N/A Trucks 7 56 99 162 Cars 7,644 East Peds: N/A Peds Cross: Cars 324 4,879 4,494 9,697 Total 8075 Peds Cross: Total 378 5,081 4,743 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 301 111 8,268 8,681 2,547 2,309 85 153 9% 6,139 5,810 101 228 5% N 378 358 7 12 5% 8,477 193 393 Dundas St W E Dundas St % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 2% 14 7 1,035 1,056 7% 244 110 5,018 5,371 4% 33 10 1,183 1,227 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 291 127 7,237 9,859 214 404 10,477 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 2,165 4,472 362 Peds Cross: West Peds: N/A Heavys 191 Cars 2,135 4,300 346 6,781 South Peds: N/A West Entering: 7,654 Trucks 73 Trucks 3 45 5 54 South Entering: 6,998 West leg Total: 16,335 Cars 6,421 Heavys 26 127 10 164 South leg Total: 13,683 Total 6,685 % Trks 1% 4% 4%

Example: (West leg total + South leg total + East leg total + North leg total) EDT = 33,918 2 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Peak Hour Factor By Movement

Municipality: Cambridge Weather conditions: Intersection: Dundas St & Franklin Blvd Cloudy GeoID: 14593 Control: Non Signalized Count Date: Wednesday, 19-Sep-18 Major Road: Franklin Blvd Person(s) who counted: AT06-NS North Approach PHF East Approach PHF AM Peak: 0.92 AM Peak: 0.87 Mid-day Peak: 0.95 Movement Mid-day Peak: 0.94 PM Peak: 0.91 PM 0.88 0.92 0.89 PM Peak: 0.97 MID 0.87 0.94 0.90 AM 0.53 0.90 0.96 Franklin Blvd AM AM Peak Hour MID Mid-day Peak Hour AM MID PM PM PM Peak Hour 0.79 0.90 0.90 N 0.89 0.96 0.96

0.66 0.75 0.59 Movement Dundas St W E

S PM MID AM Dundas St 0.79 0.90 0.77 0.91 0.84 0.93

Movement 0.77 0.92 0.69

Franklin Blvd West Approach PHF 0.73 0.83 0.67 AM South Approach PHF AM Peak: 0.89 0.79 0.87 0.69 MID AM Peak: 0.90 Mid-day Peak: 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.83 PM Mid-day Peak: 0.98 PM Peak: 0.92 Movement PM Peak: 0.91

Comments Intersection: Dundas St & Franklin Blvd Intersection Control: Non Signalized GeoID: 14593 Date: Wednesday, 19-Sep-18 Municipality: Cambridge Name: AT06-NS Major Road: Franklin Blvd Weather: Cloudy

EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND

Approach Control Yield Control Yield Control Yield Control Yield Control Movement LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT Approach Lanes > 2 < > 2 < > 2 < > 2 < TOTAL TOTAL HOUR 7:30 to 7:45 9 76 4 7 154 61 37 126 3 43 52 9 581 7:45 to 8:00 6 71 6 11 144 85 26 145 7 62 50 3 616 8:00 to 8:15 10 88 10 9 111 49 29 94 9 64 60 3 536 8:15 to 8:30 15 81 7 7 152 69 36 111 13 55 49 4 599 2,332 8:30 to 8:45 15 86 13 2 133 67 47 129 6 64 57 9 628 2,379 8:45 to 9:00 18 73 14 5 118 59 39 118 6 53 55 5 563 2,326 9:00 to 9:15 25 83 18 6 93 38 59 96 8 67 47 5 545 2,335 9:15 to 9:30 15 79 22 4 104 62 43 91 12 50 38 6 526 2,262 9:30 to 9:45 26 80 16 5 91 37 36 70 6 52 52 5 476 2,110 9:45 to 10:00 23 76 19 3 96 45 32 66 3 53 50 6 472 2,019 10:00 to 10:15 22 74 8 6 108 44 30 49 1 58 54 7 461 1,935 10:15 to 10:30 14 73 25 8 86 39 29 57 1 67 58 7 464 1,873 AM Peak Hour 7:45 to 8:45 46 326 36 29 540 270 138 479 35 245 216 19 2,379 # of trucks in peak 0 8 1 1 8 7 0 3 0 19 2 0 49 # of heavies in peak 4 19 3 4 16 10 1 13 0 22 16 4 112 % heavies (Total) 9% 8% 11% 17% 4% 6% 1% 3% 0% 17% 8% 21% 7%

12:00 to 12:15 24 71 21 4 80 21 31 60 1 81 79 9 482 12:15 to 12:30 34 86 21 8 77 30 37 45 5 83 77 6 509 12:30 to 12:45 26 75 23 11 103 42 47 53 5 78 65 13 541 12:45 to 13:00 28 87 24 9 100 38 35 61 4 89 77 9 561 2,093 13:00 to 13:15 22 61 21 13 94 37 37 61 8 70 77 13 514 2,125 13:15 to 13:30 25 94 20 6 98 35 30 71 5 85 79 10 558 2,174 13:30 to 13:45 22 74 12 6 87 35 27 56 4 85 83 10 501 2,134 13:45 to 14:00 17 59 23 10 96 51 32 67 7 75 67 7 511 2,084 Midday Peak Hour 12:30 to 13:30 101 317 88 39 395 152 149 246 22 322 298 45 2,174 # of trucks in peak 0 6 1 0 10 4 1 4 0 6 6 1 39 # of heavies in peak 0 24 4 0 18 10 2 6 1 15 10 4 94 % heavies (Total) 0% 9% 6% 0% 7% 9% 2% 4% 5% 7% 5% 11% 6%

15:00 to 15:15 15 90 37 7 106 46 47 67 10 74 110 4 613 15:15 to 15:30 14 93 23 10 103 39 35 48 3 110 125 6 609 15:30 to 15:45 19 115 28 9 104 39 40 76 15 106 148 12 711 15:45 to 16:00 17 107 27 3 103 35 61 98 9 110 135 7 712 2,645 16:00 to 16:15 13 116 36 10 120 43 50 85 9 109 143 9 743 2,775 16:15 to 16:30 19 128 34 5 125 50 53 89 7 114 150 4 778 2,944 16:30 to 16:45 14 150 39 7 129 48 36 81 9 108 148 6 775 3,008 16:45 to 17:00 16 149 21 11 118 43 49 82 6 117 148 6 766 3,062 17:00 to 17:15 26 170 31 7 134 41 33 74 9 138 144 5 812 3,131 17:15 to 17:30 26 153 44 1 132 41 49 89 6 142 165 4 852 3,205 17:30 to 17:45 13 146 24 1 113 49 30 78 4 136 135 4 733 3,163 17:45 to 18:00 19 123 34 6 116 46 42 77 7 128 143 4 745 3,142 PM Peak Hour 16:30 to 17:30 82 622 135 26 513 173 167 326 30 505 605 21 3,205 # of trucks in peak 0 5 2 0 1 4 0 1 1 3 4 0 21 # of heavies in peak 1 6 2 1 17 10 1 7 0 7 3 2 57 % heavies (Total) 1% 2% 3% 4% 4% 8% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 10% 2% Intersection: Dundas St & Franklin Blvd Intersection Control: Non Signalized GeoID: 14593 Date: Wednesday, 19-Sep-18 Municipality: Cambridge Name: AT06-NS Major Road: Franklin Blvd Weather: Cloudy

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

Crossing Approach Time East App. West App. North App. South App. TOTAL TOTAL HOUR 7:30 to 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 to 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 to 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 to 8:30 0 1 0 0 1 1 8:30 to 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 8:45 to 9:00 0 0 1 0 1 2 9:00 to 9:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 9:15 to 9:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 9:30 to 9:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 9:45 to 10:00 0 3 0 0 3 3 10:00 to 10:15 2 2 0 0 4 7 10:15 to 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 7 AM Peak Hour 9 7:45 to 8:45 0 1 0 0 1

12:00 to 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 to 12:30 0 2 0 0 2 12:30 to 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 to 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 13:00 to 13:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 13:15 to 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 to 13:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 to 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midday Peak Hour 2 12:30 to 13:30 0 0 0 0 0

15:00 to 15:15 0 1 0 1 2 15:15 to 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 to 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 to 16:00 0 2 0 0 2 4 16:00 to 16:15 0 0 0 2 2 4 16:15 to 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 4 16:30 to 16:45 0 1 0 0 1 5 16:45 to 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 17:00 to 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 to 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 to 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 to 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM Peak Hour 7 16:30 to 17:30 0 1 0 0 1 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Morning Peak Diagram From: 7:30 AM From: 7:30 AM To: 10:30 AM To: 8:30 AM

North Leg Total: 1,486 % Trks 0% 8% 12% Heavys 26 East Leg Total: 399 North Entering: 504 Heavys 0 26 5 31 Trucks 4 East Entering: 339 North Peds: 0 Trucks 0 11 1 12 Cars 952 East Peds: 0 Peds Cross: Cars 0 415 46 461 Total 982 Peds Cross: Total 0 452 52 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 0 0 0 0 325 324 0 1 0% 0 0 0 0 0% N 14 14 0 0 0% 338 0 1 0 W E Green Gate Blvd % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 0 0 0 54 1 5 60 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 0 657 8 Peds Cross: West Peds: 0 Heavys 26 Cars 0 628 8 636 South Peds: 1 West Entering: 0 Trucks 11 Trucks 0 4 0 4 South Entering: 665 West leg Total: 0 Cars 429 Heavys 0 25 0 25 South leg Total: 1,131 Total 466 % Trks 0% 4% 0%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during morning peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 1,508

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 0 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Count Period Peak Hour Mid-day Peak Diagram From: 12:00 PM From: 12:00 PM To: 2:00 PM To: 1:00 PM

North Leg Total: 1,427 % Trks 0% 3% 1% Heavys 13 East Leg Total: 224 North Entering: 751 Heavys 0 15 0 15 Trucks 14 East Entering: 108 North Peds: 2 Trucks 0 6 1 7 Cars 649 East Peds: 3 Peds Cross: Cars 0 624 105 729 Total 676 Peds Cross: Total 0 645 106 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 0 0 0 0 103 103 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% N 5 5 0 0 0% 108 0 0 0 W E Green Gate Blvd % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 0 0 0 114 1 1 116 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 0 573 10 Peds Cross: West Peds: 0 Heavys 15 Cars 0 546 9 555 South Peds: 0 West Entering: 0 Trucks 6 Trucks 0 14 0 14 South Entering: 583 West leg Total: 0 Cars 629 Heavys 0 13 1 14 South leg Total: 1,233 Total 650 % Trks 0% 5% 10%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during mid-day peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 1,442

Count Period Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Diagram From: 3:00 PM From: 4:45 PM To: 6:00 PM To: 5:45 PM

North Leg Total: 2,006 % Trks 0% 2% 0% Heavys 15 East Leg Total: 608 North Entering: 1,187 Heavys 0 10 0 10 Trucks 12 East Entering: 239 North Peds: 0 Trucks 0 4 0 4 Cars 792 East Peds: 6 Peds Cross: Cars 0 812 361 1,173 Total 819 Peds Cross: Total 0 826 361 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 0 0 0 0 236 234 0 2 1% 0 0 0 0 0% N 3 3 0 0 0% 237 0 2 0 W E Green Gate Blvd % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 0 0 0 369 0 0 369 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 0 583 8 Peds Cross: West Peds: 0 Heavys 10 Cars 0 558 8 566 South Peds: 2 West Entering: 0 Trucks 4 Trucks 0 12 0 12 South Entering: 591 West leg Total: 0 Cars 815 Heavys 0 13 0 13 South leg Total: 1,420 Total 829 % Trks 0% 4% 0%

Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during afternoon peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Example 1: Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 2,017

Total Count Diagram

Municipality: Cambridge Weather conditions: Intersection: Franklin Blvd & Green Gate Blvd Cloudy GeoID: 28799 Control: Non Signalized Count Date: Thursday, 23-Nov-17 Major Road: Franklin Blvd Person(s) who counted: AT27-GR North Leg Total: 12,433 East Leg Total: 3,020 North Entering: 6,195 % Trks 0% 4% 1% Heavys 161 East Entering: 1,595 North Peds: 10 Heavys 0 125 9 134 Trucks 79 East Peds: 21 Peds Cross: Trucks 0 71 5 76 Cars 5,998 Peds Cross: Bicycles Entering: 2 Cars 0 4,650 1,335 5,985 Total 6,238 Bicycles Entering: 1 Buggies Entering: 0 Total 0 4,846 1,349 Buggies Entering: 0 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 0 0 0 0 1,551 1,521 8 22 2% 0 0 0 0 0% N 44 43 0 1 2% 1,564 8 23 0 W E Green Gate Blvd % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 0 0 0 1,408 6 11 1,425 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 0 4,687 76 Peds Cross: West Peds: 0 Heavys 126 Cars 0 4,477 73 4,550 South Peds: 12 West Entering: 0 Trucks 71 Trucks 0 71 1 72 South Entering: 4,763 West leg Total: 0 Cars 4,693 Heavys 0 139 2 141 South leg Total: 9,653 Bicycles Entering: 0 Total 4,890 % Trks 0% 4% 4% Bicycles Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0 Comments To determine total vehicles entering the intersection, add all leg totals entering. Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection = 12,553 Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn Therefore, vehicles entering from the west = 0

Notes: None REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Estimated Daily Traffic Total Factor = Monthly Factor 1 x Daily Factor 1 x 24 Hour Factor 1.74 = 1.740000

North Leg Total: 21,633 % Trks 0% 4% 1% Heavys 280 East Leg Total: 5,255 North Entering: 10,779 Heavys 0 218 16 233 Trucks 137 East Entering: 2,775 North Peds: N/A Trucks 0 124 9 132 Cars 10,437 East Peds: N/A Peds Cross: Cars 0 8,091 2,323 10,414 Total 10854 Peds Cross: Total 0 8,432 2,347 Franklin Blvd Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks 0 0 0 0 2,699 2,647 14 38 2% 0 0 0 0 0% N 77 75 0 2 2% 2,721 14 40 0 W E Green Gate Blvd % Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total S 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total 0 0 0 2,450 10 19 2,480 Franklin Blvd

Peds Cross: Total 0 8,155 132 Peds Cross: West Peds: N/A Heavys 219 Cars 0 7,790 127 7,917 South Peds: N/A West Entering: 0 Trucks 124 Trucks 0 124 2 125 South Entering: 8,288 West leg Total: 0 Cars 8,166 Heavys 0 242 3 245 South leg Total: 16,796 Total 8,509 % Trks 0% 4% 4%

Example: (West leg total + South leg total + East leg total + North leg total) EDT = 21,842 2 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Peak Hour Factor By Movement

Municipality: Cambridge Weather conditions: Intersection: Franklin Blvd & Green Gate Blvd Cloudy GeoID: 28799 Control: Non Signalized Count Date: Thursday, 23-Nov-17 Major Road: Franklin Blvd Person(s) who counted: AT27-GR North Approach PHF East Approach PHF AM Peak: 0.97 AM Peak: 0.81 Mid-day Peak: 0.87 Movement Mid-day Peak: 0.71 PM Peak: 0.96 PM 0.00 0.93 0.88 PM Peak: 0.89 MID 0.00 0.87 0.83 AM 0.00 0.97 0.76 Franklin Blvd AM AM Peak Hour MID Mid-day Peak Hour AM MID PM PM PM Peak Hour 0.79 0.72 0.89 N 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.58 0.63 0.75 Movement 0 W E

S PM MID AM Green Gate Blvd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00

Franklin Blvd West Approach PHF 0.00 0.90 0.67 AM South Approach PHF AM Peak: 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.63 MID AM Peak: 0.90 Mid-day Peak: 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.67 PM Mid-day Peak: 0.95 PM Peak: 0.00 Movement PM Peak: 0.89

Comments Intersection: Franklin Blvd & Green Gate Blvd Intersection Control: Non Signalized GeoID: 28799 Date: Thursday, 23-Nov-17 Municipality: Cambridge Name: AT27-GR Major Road: Franklin Blvd Weather: Cloudy

EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND

Approach Control N/A Stop Control Free Flow Free Flow Movement LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT Approach Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 LANES 1 2 0 TOTAL TOTAL HOUR 7:30 to 7:45 0 0 0 1 0 103 0 183 1 11 109 0 408 7:45 to 8:00 0 0 0 4 0 82 0 163 3 11 116 0 379 8:00 to 8:15 0 0 0 6 0 73 0 161 3 13 114 0 370 8:15 to 8:30 0 0 0 3 0 67 0 150 1 17 113 0 351 1,508 8:30 to 8:45 0 0 0 3 0 75 0 158 1 16 102 0 355 1,455 8:45 to 9:00 0 0 0 5 0 81 0 143 2 7 105 0 343 1,419 9:00 to 9:15 0 0 0 2 0 64 0 157 3 19 105 0 350 1,399 9:15 to 9:30 0 0 0 2 0 43 0 175 4 15 107 0 346 1,394 9:30 to 9:45 0 0 0 3 0 38 0 134 2 12 115 0 304 1,343 9:45 to 10:00 0 0 0 1 0 36 0 148 3 16 112 0 316 1,316 10:00 to 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 125 2 7 127 0 290 1,256 10:15 to 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 136 0 13 113 0 285 1,195 AM Peak Hour 7:30 to 8:30 0 0 0 14 0 325 0 657 8 52 452 0 1,508 # of trucks in peak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 11 0 16 # of heavies in peak 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 25 0 5 26 0 57 % heavies (Total) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 12% 8% 0% 5%

12:00 to 12:15 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 151 3 30 185 0 388 12:15 to 12:30 0 0 0 1 0 27 0 145 4 26 157 0 360 12:30 to 12:45 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 137 1 32 164 0 357 12:45 to 13:00 0 0 0 2 0 36 0 140 2 18 139 0 337 1,442 13:00 to 13:15 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 135 2 33 132 0 341 1,395 13:15 to 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 127 3 23 150 0 336 1,371 13:30 to 13:45 0 0 0 1 0 30 0 140 1 19 143 0 334 1,348 13:45 to 14:00 0 0 0 2 0 26 0 136 0 32 144 0 340 1,351 Midday Peak Hour 12:00 to 13:00 0 0 0 5 0 103 0 573 10 106 645 0 1,442 # of trucks in peak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 6 0 21 # of heavies in peak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 0 15 0 29 % heavies (Total) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 10% 1% 3% 0% 3%

15:00 to 15:15 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 148 3 59 186 0 440 15:15 to 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 161 2 67 174 0 438 15:30 to 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 139 3 89 168 0 435 15:45 to 16:00 0 0 0 1 0 55 0 146 5 76 156 0 439 1,752 16:00 to 16:15 0 0 0 1 0 47 0 136 6 74 189 0 453 1,765 16:15 to 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 142 0 94 184 0 464 1,791 16:30 to 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 145 4 90 212 0 496 1,852 16:45 to 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 129 2 102 208 0 497 1,910 17:00 to 17:15 0 0 0 1 0 52 0 142 2 79 213 0 489 1,946 17:15 to 17:30 0 0 0 1 0 62 0 149 1 87 221 0 521 2,003 17:30 to 17:45 0 0 0 1 0 66 0 163 3 93 184 0 510 2,017 17:45 to 18:00 0 0 0 1 0 65 0 143 4 69 199 0 481 2,001 PM Peak Hour 16:45 to 17:45 0 0 0 3 0 236 0 583 8 361 826 0 2,017 # of trucks in peak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 4 0 16 # of heavies in peak 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 13 0 0 10 0 25 % heavies (Total) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 4% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% Intersection: Franklin Blvd & Green Gate Blvd Intersection Control: Non Signalized GeoID: 28799 Date: Thursday, 23-Nov-17 Municipality: Cambridge Name: AT27-GR Major Road: Franklin Blvd Weather: Cloudy

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

Crossing Approach Time East App. West App. North App. South App. TOTAL TOTAL HOUR 7:30 to 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 to 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 to 8:15 0 0 0 1 1 8:15 to 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 8:30 to 8:45 0 0 1 0 1 2 8:45 to 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 9:00 to 9:15 1 0 1 0 2 3 9:15 to 9:30 0 0 0 0 0 3 9:30 to 9:45 0 0 0 1 1 3 9:45 to 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 10:00 to 10:15 0 0 1 1 2 3 10:15 to 10:30 0 0 0 1 1 4 AM Peak Hour 7:30 to 8:30 0 0 0 1 1

12:00 to 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 to 12:30 0 0 1 0 1 12:30 to 12:45 1 0 0 0 1 12:45 to 13:00 2 0 1 0 3 5 13:00 to 13:15 1 0 1 1 3 8 13:15 to 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 7 13:30 to 13:45 0 0 0 0 0 6 13:45 to 14:00 2 0 0 1 3 6 Midday Peak Hour 12:00 to 13:00 3 0 2 0 5

15:00 to 15:15 2 0 1 4 7 15:15 to 15:30 3 0 3 0 6 15:30 to 15:45 1 0 0 0 1 15:45 to 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 14 16:00 to 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 7 16:15 to 16:30 1 0 0 0 1 2 16:30 to 16:45 1 0 0 0 1 2 16:45 to 17:00 3 0 0 0 3 5 17:00 to 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 5 17:15 to 17:30 3 0 0 1 4 8 17:30 to 17:45 0 0 0 1 1 8 17:45 to 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 5 PM Peak Hour 16:45 to 17:45 6 0 0 2 8 PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Appendix E SYNCHRO ANALYSIS OUTPUTS July 9, 2020

Appendix E SYNCHRO ANALYSIS OUTPUTS

E.1

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 107: Nottinghill Drive & Site Access 06/17/2020

Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 36 10 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 36 10 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1883 1883 0 1883 1883 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1883 1883 0 1883 1883 0 Link Speed (k/h) 48 50 50 Link Distance (m) 43.7 153.6 98.2 Travel Time (s) 3.3 11.1 7.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 39 11 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 39 11 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(m) 3.7 3.7 3.7 Link Offset(m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Width(m) 4.9 4.9 4.9 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Turning Speed (k/h) 24 14 24 14 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2022 Future Background -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 107: Nottinghill Drive & Site Access 06/17/2020

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 36 10 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 0 0 36 10 0 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 0 39 11 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 50 11 11 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 50 11 11 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 959 1070 1608 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 0 0 39 11 Volume Left 0000 Volume Right 0000 cSH 1700 1700 1608 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS AA Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2022 Future Background -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 304 6 4 243 22 14 Future Volume (vph) 304 6 4 243 22 14 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (m) 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 1 Taper Length (m) 7.6 7.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.997 0.850 Flt Protected 0.999 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1878 0 0 1882 1789 1601 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1878 0 0 1882 1789 1601 Link Speed (k/h) 60 60 50 Link Distance (m) 417.6 339.4 98.2 Travel Time (s) 25.1 20.4 7.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 330 7 4 264 24 15 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 337 0 0 268 24 15 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(m) 0.0 0.0 3.7 Link Offset(m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Width(m) 4.9 4.9 4.9 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Turning Speed (k/h) 14 24 24 14 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2022 Future Background -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 304 6 4 243 22 14 Future Volume (Veh/h) 304 6 4 243 22 14 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 330 7 4 264 24 15 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 337 606 334 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 337 606 334 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 95 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 1222 459 708 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 Volume Total 337 268 24 15 Volume Left 0 4 24 0 Volume Right 7 0 0 15 cSH 1700 1222 459 708 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.02 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.1 1.3 0.5 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 13.3 10.2 Lane LOS ABB Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 12.1 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2022 Future Background -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Lanes and Geometrics 107: Nottinghill Drive & Site Access 06/17/2020

Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (m) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 0 Taper Length (m) 7.6 7.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1883 1883 0 1883 1883 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1883 1883 0 1883 1883 0 Link Speed (k/h) 48 80 80 Link Distance (m) 43.7 153.6 98.2 Travel Time (s) 3.3 6.9 4.4 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2022 Future Background -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 107: Nottinghill Drive & Site Access 06/17/2020

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0007620 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0007620 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0008670 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 75 67 67 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 75 67 67 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 928 997 1535 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 0 0 8 67 Volume Left 0000 Volume Right 0000 cSH 1700 1700 1535 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS AA Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2022 Future Background -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lanes and Geometrics 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (m) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (m) 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 1 Taper Length (m) 7.6 7.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.980 0.850 Flt Protected 0.998 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1846 0 0 1880 1789 1601 Flt Permitted 0.998 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1846 0 0 1880 1789 1601 Link Speed (k/h) 97 97 80 Link Distance (m) 417.6 339.4 98.2 Travel Time (s) 15.5 12.6 4.4 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2022 Future Background -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 251 43 19 438 5 2 Future Volume (Veh/h) 251 43 19 438 5 2 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 273 47 21 476 5 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 320 814 296 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 320 814 296 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 99 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1240 341 743 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 Volume Total 320 497 5 2 Volume Left 0 21 5 0 Volume Right 47 0 0 2 cSH 1700 1240 341 743 Volume to Capacity 0.19 0.02 0.01 0.00 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.1 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 15.7 9.9 Lane LOS ACA Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 14.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2022 Future Background -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 107: Nottinghill Drive & Site Access 06/17/2020

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 38 10 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 0 0 38 10 0 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 0 41 11 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 52 11 11 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 52 11 11 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 957 1070 1608 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 0 0 41 11 Volume Left 0000 Volume Right 0000 cSH 1700 1700 1608 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS AA Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2027 Future Background -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 319 6 4 251 24 14 Future Volume (Veh/h) 319 6 4 251 24 14 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 347 7 4 273 26 15 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 354 632 350 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 354 632 350 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 94 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 1205 443 693 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 Volume Total 354 277 26 15 Volume Left 0 4 26 0 Volume Right 7 0 0 15 cSH 1700 1205 443 693 Volume to Capacity 0.21 0.00 0.06 0.02 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.5 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 13.6 10.3 Lane LOS ABB Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 12.4 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2027 Future Background -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 107: Nottinghill Drive & Street Access 06/17/2020

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0008650 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0008650 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0009710 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 80 71 71 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 80 71 71 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 922 991 1529 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 0 0 9 71 Volume Left 0000 Volume Right 0000 cSH 1700 1700 1529 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS AA Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2027 Future Background -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 264 45 20 460 5 3 Future Volume (Veh/h) 264 45 20 460 5 3 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 287 49 22 500 5 3 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 336 856 312 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 336 856 312 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 98 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1223 322 729 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 Volume Total 336 522 5 3 Volume Left 0 22 5 0 Volume Right 49 0 0 3 cSH 1700 1223 322 729 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.02 0.02 0.00 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.1 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 16.3 10.0 Lane LOS ACA Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 13.9 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2027 Future Background -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 107: Nottinghill Drive & Site Access 06/17/2020

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 2 1 36 10 44 Future Volume (Veh/h) 104 2 1 36 10 44 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 113 2 1 39 11 48 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 76 35 59 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 76 35 59 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 88 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 927 1038 1545 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 113 2 40 59 Volume Left 113 0 1 0 Volume Right 0 2 0 48 cSH 927 1038 1545 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 Queue Length 95th (m) 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s) 9.4 8.5 0.2 0.0 Lane LOS AAA Approach Delay (s) 9.4 0.2 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2022 Future Total -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 304 46 8 239 120 19 Future Volume (Veh/h) 304 46 8 239 120 19 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 330 50 9 260 130 21 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 380 633 355 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 380 633 355 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 70 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1178 440 689 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 Volume Total 380 269 130 21 Volume Left 0 9 130 0 Volume Right 50 0 0 21 cSH 1700 1178 440 689 Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.01 0.30 0.03 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.2 9.3 0.7 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 16.6 10.4 Lane LOS ACB Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 15.7 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2022 Future Total -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 107: Nottinghill Drive & Site Access 06/17/2020

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 95 0 1 7 62 73 Future Volume (Veh/h) 95 0 1 7 62 73 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 103 0 1 8 67 79 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 116 106 146 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 116 106 146 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 88 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 879 948 1436 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 103 0 9 146 Volume Left 103 0 1 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 79 cSH 879 1700 1436 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.09 Queue Length 95th (m) 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s) 9.6 0.0 0.8 0.0 Lane LOS AAA Approach Delay (s) 9.6 0.8 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2022 Future Total -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 251 111 25 438 103 6 Future Volume (Veh/h) 251 111 25 438 103 6 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 273 121 27 476 112 7 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 394 864 334 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 394 864 334 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 65 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 1165 317 708 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 Volume Total 394 503 112 7 Volume Left 0 27 112 0 Volume Right 121 0 0 7 cSH 1700 1165 317 708 Volume to Capacity 0.23 0.02 0.35 0.01 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.5 11.7 0.2 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 22.4 10.1 Lane LOS ACB Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 21.7 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2022 Future Total -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 107: Nottinghill Drive & Site Access 06/17/2020

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 2 1 38 10 44 Future Volume (Veh/h) 104 2 1 38 10 44 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 113 2 1 41 11 48 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 78 35 59 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 78 35 59 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 88 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 924 1038 1545 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 113 2 42 59 Volume Left 113 0 1 0 Volume Right 0 2 0 48 cSH 924 1038 1545 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 Queue Length 95th (m) 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s) 9.4 8.5 0.2 0.0 Lane LOS AAA Approach Delay (s) 9.4 0.2 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2027 Future Total -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 319 46 8 251 122 20 Future Volume (Veh/h) 319 46 8 251 122 20 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 347 50 9 273 133 22 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 397 663 372 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 397 663 372 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 69 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1162 423 674 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 Volume Total 397 282 133 22 Volume Left 0 9 133 0 Volume Right 50 0 0 22 cSH 1700 1162 423 674 Volume to Capacity 0.23 0.01 0.31 0.03 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.2 10.1 0.8 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 17.4 10.5 Lane LOS ACB Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 16.4 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 5:00 pm 04/16/2020 2027 Future Total -AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 107: Nottinghill Drive & Site Access 06/17/2020

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 95 0 1 8 65 73 Future Volume (Veh/h) 95 0 1 8 65 73 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 103 0 1 9 71 79 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 122 110 150 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 122 110 150 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 88 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 873 943 1431 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 103 0 10 150 Volume Left 103 0 1 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 79 cSH 873 1700 1431 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.09 Queue Length 95th (m) 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s) 9.7 0.0 0.8 0.0 Lane LOS AAA Approach Delay (s) 9.7 0.8 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2027 Future Total -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 108: Nottinghill Drive & Main Street 06/17/2020

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 264 113 26 460 103 6 Future Volume (Veh/h) 264 113 26 460 103 6 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 287 123 28 500 112 7 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 410 904 348 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 410 904 348 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 63 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 1149 300 695 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 Volume Total 410 528 112 7 Volume Left 0 28 112 0 Volume Right 123 0 0 7 cSH 1700 1149 300 695 Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.02 0.37 0.01 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.6 12.7 0.2 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 24.0 10.2 Lane LOS ACB Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 23.2 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

Nottinghill Drive TIS Study 04/16/2020 2027 Future Total -PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Appendix F TDM CHECKLIST AND PARKING MANAGEMENT WORKSHEET July 9, 2020

Appendix F TDM CHECKLIST AND PARKING MANAGEMENT WORKSHEET

F.2

APPENDIX G: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

Site Address: Part of Lot 4 Con 10, North Dumfries Site Context: Date: 07/09/2020 ZBL Parking Requirement: Applicable Parking Reduction:

The Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Checklist and Parking Management Worksheet are not designed for residential properties, but can be used to inform mixed-use developments. TABLE A Site Access In creating an environment that supports pedestrian and cycling activity, the public realm must be accessible, safe, and comfortable to encourage movement on the street and in the surrounding area(s). These facilities and features should encourage walking and cycling. Points Features Yes N/A Development incorporates functional building entrances that are oriented to public space or to locations A1 2 where pedestrians and transit users arrive from such as a street, square, park or plaza. Yes External to site: Continuous sidewalks (consistent with AODA Accessible Built Environment Standard) are provided along both sides of all adjacent public streets Yes A2 1 AND Internal to site: Pedestrian walkways (consistent with AODA Accessible Built Environment Standard e.g.1.8m min width) are provided through large parking areas to link the building with the public street Yes sidewalk system Non-residential: development provides secure bike storage for 5% of the building occupants. Consistent A3 3 with LEED requirements. A4 4 Shower and change facilities for employees provided on-site consistent with LEED requirements. A5 2 Provision of active uses at-grade along street frontages (e.g. retail). Yes Category Max Total Points Applicable = Score = 5 = 10 10 TABLE B Public Transportation Access The availability and proximity of convenient public transit service with direct pedestrian linkages to the building will provide viable travel options for employees, visitors and residents. Points Features Yes N/A Bus shelters with seating are provided at the transit stop immediately adjacent to the development in Yes B1 1 consultation with Transportation Planning at the Region of Waterloo Information regarding public transit routes, schedules and fares are provided in an accessible and visible Yes B2 1 location on site and in adjacent bus stops B3a 5 Located within 800m of a Rapid Transit Station Located within 600 m of a bus service with headways of 15 min or less or is located in a designated mixed B3b 3 use corridor or node. Note: Points are awarded for either B3a, B3b or B3c only. Please choose whichever represents the highest order of transit.

Located within 400 m of a bus service with headways of 16 min to 30 min. Note: Points are awarded for Yes B3c 1 either B3a, B3b or B3c only. Please choose whichever represents the highest order of transit. Category Max Total Points Applicable = Score = 3 = 5 5 TABLE C Parking Vehicle parking facilities can affect the character, travel mode and cost of a development. Reducing parking supply to match expected demand can a have a positive influence on the selection of alternative travel modes. Points Features Yes N/A Utilizes reduced parking supply consistent with the voluntary TDM Parking Management Worksheet (Appendix I). Contact your Area Municipal planning authority to determine whether the Worksheet is Yes C1 24 applicable to your development. Note: Points are awarded for either C1, C2, or C3 only. Please choose whichever applies with the highest value. Includes allowances for shared parking in mixed-use zones. Note: Points are awarded for C1, C2, or C3 Yes C2 24 only. Please choose whichever applies after consulting with the Area Municipal planning authority. Provides no more than the minimum number of parking spaces, as required by applicable Zoning By-Law. Yes C3 15 Note: Points are awarded for either C1, C2, or C3 only. Please choose whichever applies.

- 29 - Implements paid parking on part or all of the site (e.g. parking permits, paid parking zones near main C4 10 entrances) C5 3 Provides priority parking for carpooling/vanpooling participants equivalent to 5% of employee spaces C6 5 Commercial Uses: Provide car-share spaces equivalent to 2% of building occupants C7 3 Parking is not located on major street frontage or between a road right of way and the building facade. YES C8 5 25% to 50% of parking is located underground or in a structure C9 10 50% to 75% of parking is located underground or in a structure C10 15 75% of parking or more is located underground or in a structure Yes C11 3 Parking spaces provided off-site on a lot within 300 metres of the lot containing such use. Category Max Total Points Applicable = Score = 25 = 25 25 TABLE D Trip Reduction Incentives A formal TDM plan will identify specific initiatives that will be initiated in order to encourage reduced single occupant vehicle travel.

Points Features Yes N/A D1 2 The building owner/occupant will make available a ride matching service for car/vanpooling D2 2 The building owner/occupant will make available emergency ride home options The building owner/occupant will make available subsidized transit passes for all occupants for a period of D3 5 two years D4 5 The building owner/occupant agrees to charge for parking as an unbundled cost to occupants The building owner/occupant agrees to provide reduced cost parking for users of car/van pool, bicycle, D5 2 moped/motorcycle spaces The building owner/occupant has prepared a TDM plan to the satisfaction of the Region of Waterloo and D6 10 the Area Municipality that targets a 10% reduction in peak hour trips using forecast trip generation with status quo travel characteristics D7 5 The employer has provided flexible working hours, telework or shift work arrangements. The development agrees to join Travelwise (TMA) that provides the same services outlined under items D8 14 D1, D2, D6 D9 5 The building owner/occupant will make available car sharing services The development includes mixed uses (i.e. retail, commercial or food services, daycares, or other Yes D10 2 complementary uses) on-site or located within 400 metres. Category Max Total Points Applicable = Score = 2 = 25 25 TABLE E Checklist Summary For each item, a “Yes” answer is equivalent to the points as indicated in the section. N/A sections should be explained in an attachment to this table. The score for each section is reflected as a percentage and calculated by dividing the points by the “Total Applicable”. Minimum Total Category Points Scored Comments Requirement Applicable Pedestrian & 5 Cyclist Orientation 10 Public Transit 3 Access 24 5 Parking 25 25 SUB-TOTAL 40 33 Trip Reduction 2 Incentives 25 OVERALL 35 TOTAL 65

TABLE F Scoring Summary - 30 - FINAL SCORE RATING 50 - 65 **** 40 -49 *** TDM-SUPPORTIVE DEVELOPMENT 30 - 39 ** 35 24 - 29 * 0 - 23 X Non-TDM-Supportive Development

- 31 - APPENDIX I: Parking management worksheet Site Address: Part of Lot 4 Con 10, North Dumfries Site Context:

Date: 07/09/2020 Worksheet No.:

"Urban Growth Centres - (UGC) area classification includes the downtown and RT Station Areas of Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge.

"Intensification Corridor" (IC) classification is applied to sites within 800 metres of the future CTC line

"Other" classification applies to all other sites

Please highlight the cell percentages applicable to your development under the appropriate classification. Please note that the Parking Management Worksheet and the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Checklist are not designed for residential properties, but can be used for mixed-use developments. Local municipalities are the decision-making bodies with respect to consideration of parking reductions below Zoning By-law requirements. TABLE A Pedestrian and Cyclist Orientation

In creating an environment that supports pedestrian and cycling activity, the public realm must be accessible, safe, and comfortable to encourage movement on the street and in the surrounding area(s). These facilities and features should encourage walking and cycling. Features UGC IC Other Development incorporates functional building entrances that are oriented A1 to public space or to locations where pedestrians and transit users arrive 1% 1% 1% from such as a street, square, park or plaza. Continuous sidewalks (1.5m min. width) are provided along both sides of all adjacent public streets and pedestrian walkways (1.5m min width) are A2 provided through large parking areas to link the building with the public 0% 0% 1% street sidewalk system Non-Residential: Development provides secure bike storage for 4% of the A3 building occupants 2% 2% 1% Shower and change facilities for employees provided on-site consistent A4 with LEED requirements. 1% 1% 1% A5 Provision of active uses at-grade along street frontages. 1% 1% 1% Category Maximum 4% 4% 4% Available Parking Reduction 3% TABLE B Public Transportation Access The availability and proximity of convenient public transit service with direct pedestrian linkages to the building will provide viable travel options for employees, visitors and residents. Features UGC IC Other Bus shelters with seating are provided at the transit stop immediately B1 adjacent to the development, in consultation with Transportation Planning 0% 0% 1% at the Region of Waterloo Information regarding public transit routes, schedules and fares are B2 provided in an accessible and visible location on site and in adjacent bus 0% 0% 1% stops B3a Located in an UGC or within 800 m of a future Rapid Transit Station 24% 12% 0% Located within 600m a transit route with 15 minute headways (or less) or is located in a designated mixed use corridor or node. Note: Points are B3b awarded for either B3a, B3b or B3c only. Please choose whichever - 5% 3% represents the highest order of transit. Located within 400 metres of a bus service with headways of 15 min to 30 B3c min. Note: Points are awarded for either B3a, B3b or B3c only. Please - - 1% choose whichever represents the highest order of transit. Category Maximum 24% 12% 5% - 32 - Available Parking Reduction 3% TABLE C Parking Vehicle parking facilities can affect the character, travel mode and cost of a development. Reducing parking supply to match expected demand can have a positive influence on the selection of alternative travel modes. Features UGC IC Other Provides priority parking for carpooling/vanpooling participants equivalent C1 to 5% of employee spaces 0% 0% 5% Commercial Uses: Provide car-share spaces equivalent to 2% of building C2 occupants 2% 2% 0% Implements paid parking system on all or part of the site (e.g. parking C3 permits, paid parking zones near main entrances) 2% 2% 1% C4 Parking is not located on major street frontage. 0% 0% 1% C5 25% to 50% of parking is located underground or in a structure 2% 1% 0% C6 50% to 75% of parking is located underground or in a structure 4% 2% 0% C7 75% of parking or more is located underground or in a structure 5% 3% 0% Category Maximum 6% 4% 6% Available Parking Reduction 1%

TABLE D Trip Reduction Incentives A formal TDM plan will identify specific initiatives that will be initiated in order to encourage reduced single occupant vehicle travel. Features UGC IC Other The building owner/occupant will provide a ride matching service for D1 car/vanpooling 0% 0% 1% D2 The building owner/occupant will provide emergency ride home options 3% 2% 1% The building owner/occupant will provide subsidized transit passes for all D3 occupants for a period of two years 10% 4% 2% The building owner/occupant agrees to charge for parking as an separate D4 cost to occupants 10% 5% 2% The building owner/occupant agrees to provide reduced cost for users of D5 car/van pool, bicycle, moped/motorcycle spaces 0% 0% 1% The development agrees to join Travelwise (TMA) that provides the same D6 services outlined under items D1 and D2 9% 6% 4% Category Maximum 23% 11% 7% Available Parking Reduction TABLE E Parking Reduction Summary Please indicate the total reduction available based upon Tables A through D above. Maximum Achievable Reduction Reduction Category Achieved UGC IC Other Comments Pedestrian & Cyclist Orientation 3% 4% 4% 4% Public Transit Access 3% 24% 12% 5% Parking 1% 6% 4% 6% Trip Reduction Incentives 23% 11% 7% TOTAL 6% 57% 31% 22%

TABLE F TOTAL REDUCTION ACHIEVED 6%

- 33 -