DOCSLIB.ORG

Traffic Impact Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development at Main Street East and Nottinghill Drive, Cambridge, ON Traffic Impact Study City of Cambridge July 23, 2020 Prepared for: Mr. Shankar Thurairajah 2370826 Ontario Inc. 1240 Main Street East Milton ON L9T 8M7. Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Revision Description Author Quality Check Independent Review 0A Draft B Channa Reddy 07-23-20 Brandon Orr 07-23-20 PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AT MAIN STREET EAST AND NOTTINGHILL DRIVE, CAMBRIDGE, ON TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY This document entitled Proposed Mixed-Use Development at Main Street East and Nottinghill Drive, Cambridge, ON Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Stantec Consulting Private Limited (“Stantec”) for the account of Mr. Shankar Thurairajah (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Bhargav Channa Reddy, M.Eng. Reviewed by (signature) Brandon Orr, MCIP, RPP PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AT MAIN STREET EAST AND NOTTINGHILL DRIVE, CAMBRIDGE, ON TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1.1 1.1 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................1.1 1.2 SITE/DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................1.3 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................2. 1 2.1 ROADS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL ..............................................................................2. 1 2.2 TRANSIT ......................................................................................................................2.2 2.3 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION .......................................................................................2.2 2.4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ....................................................................................................2. 3 3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS ...............................................................................................3.1 3.1 HORIZON YEARS AND BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC .......................... 3.1 3.1.1 Growth Rate ................................................................................................ 3.1 3.1.2 Planned Roadway and Transit Improvements ............................................. 3.1 3.1.3 Intersection control ...................................................................................... 3.1 3.2 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ....................................................3.4 3.3 SITE TRIPS ..................................................................................................................3.6 3.3.1 Trip Generation ........................................................................................... 3.6 3.3.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment ................................................................. 3.7 3.4 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ................................................................3.11 3.5 PARKING REVIEW & TDM ........................................................................................3.12 3.5.1 By-Law Requirements ............................................................................... 3.12 3.5.2 Mode Share & Car Ownership Comparison ............................................... 3.12 3.5.3 Transit and Active Transportation Mode Assessment ................................ 3.14 3.5.4 Regional TDM Checklist and Parking Management Worksheet ................. 3.15 3.5.5 Parking Justification Summary .................................................................. 3.15 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................4.1 i PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AT MAIN STREET EAST AND NOTTINGHILL DRIVE, CAMBRIDGE, ON TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Site Statistics ..............................................................................................................1.3 Table 2 Transit Routes .............................................................................................................2.2 Table 3 Intersection Level of Service Delay Criteria ................................................................3.4 Table 4 2022 Future Background | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis ...............................3.5 Table 5 2027 Future Background | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis ...............................3.5 Table 6 Site Trip Generation ...................................................................................................3.6 Table 7 Trip Distribution ..........................................................................................................3.7 Table 8 2022 Future Total | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis ........................................ 3.11 Table 9 2027 Future Total | Peak Hour Traffic Operation Analysis ........................................ 3.11 Table 10 Vehicle Parking Space Requirements ....................................................................3.12 Table 11 TTS Mode share data | Daily ..................................................................................3.13 Table 12 TTS Car ownership data.........................................................................................3.14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Study Area ................................................................................................................1.2 Figure 2 Site Plan ...................................................................................................................1.4 Figure 3 Existing Road Network .............................................................................................. 2.1 Figure 4 Existing Transit Network............................................................................................ 2.3 Figure 5 Existing and Planned Cycling Network ......................................................................2.3 Figure 6 Base Year 2020 Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour .......................................................2.5 Figure 7 Base Year 2020 Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hou ........................................................2.5 Figure 8 2022 Future Background Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ........................................3.2 Figure 9 2022 Future Background Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ........................................3.2 Figure 10 2027 Future Background Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ........................................3.3 Figure 11 2027 Future Background Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ........................................3.3 Figure 12 Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ........................................................................3.8 Figure 13 Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ........................................................................3.8 Figure 14 2022 Future Total Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ..................................................3.9 Figure 15 2022 Future Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ..................................................3.9 Figure 16 2027 Future Total Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................................................ 3.10 Figure 17 2027 Future Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................................................ 3.10 Figure 18 TTS Zone Map ......................................................................................................3.13 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A PRE-STUDY CONFERENCE MEETING.................................................... A.1 APPENDIX B SITE PLAN ................................................................................................. B.1 APPENDIX C BUS SCHEDULES AND ROUTE MAPS .................................................... C.1 APPENDIX D TRAFFIC DATA ......................................................................................... D.1 APPENDIX E SYNCHRO ANALYSIS OUTPUTS ............................................................. E.1 APPENDIX F TDM CHECKLIST AND PARKING MANAGEMENT WORKSHEET ........... F.2 ii PART OF LOT 4 CON 10, NORTH DUMFRIES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Introduction July 23, 2020 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY This Study assesses the transportation impact of a proposed mixed-use residential development in the City of Cambridge. The proposed development is located at the southwest corner of the future intersection of Nottinghill drive and Main Street East, City of Cambridge, as shown in Figure 1. The development consists of one residential tower with 12 stories and ground floor retail and another 10- storey residential tower. The development will feature a total of 367 dwelling units, 648 m2 of ground-floor retail, 443 total (25 surface and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Station Profile for Waterloo Public Square Station
    : 160/hectare 108/hectare General Characteristics • Urban core of the City of Waterloo • Mix of commercial, residential, cultural, employment and institutional uses d R Future Population and Employment Density n l o in St c n Desired residential and job density within 800m of LRT Station i Updated December 2020 L Current Waterloo Public Square Station residential density: 51/hectare Current Waterloo Public Square Station employment density: 57/hectare Weber St N Current Waterloo Public Square Station residential and job density: Projected 2021 Waterloo Public Square Station residential and job density: 122/hectare City of Waterloo Land Use Recommendations Active Frontage** Dover St Convertible Frontage** i Additional Active/Convertible Frontage** g Waterloo Public Square Station was not included in the City of Waterloo’s Station El Br Area Planning Initiative. ighto n St Devitt Ave N Devitt Ave S Additional Land Use Recommendations S l l a Moore Ave N • Encourage higher density and mixed use land uses along key transit h s corridors while maintaining established low density residential r a Pe E neighbourhoods M St p t r p d S le Lucan Ave St e r R l k St t e o s r r E c R e e o u o p a m St t S N e L a n i g n J d Bowman St g i h r El o E B J Wil e l t St ow v St S g Willow St A R e e n e Industrial/Employment r i g n v r E e in Heavy Industrial Employment i A a E P k St Sp St Institutional c a N i r t St r Major Institutional n W b St B K o Ez in t ing Open Space St St g p Er t St S K l St u ber ry D e t S er a a g o H tr rs N D M e
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin
    ERA BULLETIN — AUGUST, 2019 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 62, No. 8 August, 2019 The Bulletin NORTH AMERICA’S NEWEST LIGHT RAIL SYSTEM Published by the Electric Railroaders’ by Jeffrey Erlitz Association, Inc. P. O. Box 3323 (Photographs by Andrew Grahl) Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 On June 21, 2019, North America’s newest For general inquiries, light rail line opened to the public. The Re- or Bulletin submissions, contact us at gion of Waterloo’s Grand River Transit Route bulletin@erausa. org 301 is known as the ION light rail line. This or on our website at line connects the cities of Waterloo and erausa. org/contact Kitchener. Editorial Staff: Construction began in August, 2014 with service projected to start in late 2017. How- Jeffrey Erlitz Editor-in-Chief ever, the project was delayed several times because of delays in the manufacture and Ronald Yee Tri-State News and delivery of the rolling stock, specifically 14 Commuter Rail Editor Bombardier Transportation Flexity Freedom light rail vehicles. The ION fleet is stored and Alexander Ivanoff ION ribbon-cutting at the Fairway station in Kitchener. North American and maintained at the ION Operations, Mainte- World News Editor nance and Storage Facility (OMSF) located David Ross on Dutton Drive in Waterloo. Keolis Grand Production Manager River – Keolis’ local subsidiary – is responsi- ble for the 9.94-mile light-rail line operations Copyright © 2019 ERA for the next 10 years and maintenance for the next 30 years. The contract, which was This Month’s awarded in May, 2014, is under a Public- Cover Photo: Private Partnership (PPP).
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    24-30 Union Street East, Waterloo ON Parking Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited December 2020 200532 Project Number 24-30 Union Street East, Waterloo ON 200532 Parking Study December 2020 Client Union St LP. 607 King Street West, Suite 205A Kitchener, ON N2G 1C7 Client Contact Zac Zehr Consultant Project Team Erica Bayley, P.Eng. Maddison Murch, EIT Signing Licence/Engineer, P.Eng. Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof (the “project”) and except for approval and commenting municipalities and agencies in their review and approval of this project, should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authorization of Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited being obtained. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a purpose other than the project for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees and will by such use or reliance be taken Paradigm Transportation to confirm their agreement to indemnify Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited for all loss or damage resulting there from. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Solutions Limited Limited accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than 5A-150 Pinebush Road the person by whom it was commissioned and the approval and commenting Cambridge ON N1R 8J8 municipalities and agencies for the project. p: 519.896.3163 To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, 905.381.2229 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited accepts no liability for any loss or 416.479.9684 damage suffered by the client, whether through contract or tort, stemming from any www.ptsl.com conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited and used by Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited in Version 1.0.0 preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 10, 2015 2:00 PM AGENDA
    THIS MEETING MAY BE TELECAST ON PUBLIC TELEVISION OR WEBCAST ON THE CITY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 10, 2015 2:00 P.M. AGENDA Mayor Jaworsky in the Chair 1. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) July 13, 2015 – Council Meeting Page 14 Recommendation: That the minutes of the Council Meeting held on July 13, 2015 be approved as printed. 3. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES None Council Meeting Page 1 of 409 August 10, 2015 4. CONSENT MOTION That Consent Items (a) through (f) be approved. a) Title: Community Cash Grant Policy Revisions Page 29 Report No.: COM2015-020 Prepared By: Lori Ludwig and Beth Rajnovich Recommendation: 1. That Council approve report COM2015-020. 2. That Council approve the revised Community Cash Grants Policy No. M-004, attached to this report as Appendix A. 3. That Council repeal R&L01-14 Cash Grants – Late Application Policy. b) Title: Heads and Beds Page 51 Report No.: CORP2015-069 Prepared By: Paul Grivicic Recommendation: 1. That Council approves report CORP2015-069, and that Council requests the Minister of Finance for the Province of Ontario to: a. Maintain the current “heads and beds” rate methodology and amend the current prescribed “heads and beds” rate used to calculate payment-in-lieu of taxes on public hospitals, universities, colleges and correctional facilities from $75 per capacity to an equivalent rate of $125 per capacity that would be raised if these public institutions used current value assessment (CVA) multiplied by residential tax rate methodology, and ensure that the “heads and beds” rate thereafter is adjusted regularly to reflect changes in CVA on public institutions and municipal tax rates; b.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Final Budget Book
    2020 Program Budgets The Regional Municipality of Waterloo 2020 Program Budgets Table of Contents Summaries Page # 2020 Budget Overview 1 Tax Supported Program Budget & Capital Budget Summaries 11 User Rate Program Budget & Capital Budget Summaries 26 Service Area Elected Offices 31 Chief Administrator’s Office 34 Corporate Services 38 Commissioner of Corporate Services 41 Information Technology Services 42 Facilities & Fleet Management 47 Treasury Services 62 Financial Services & Development Financing 65 Human Resources & Citizen Service 70 Commissioner of Human Resources & Citizen Service (Includes Office of Corporate Performance & Emergency Management Office) 75 Talent Management & Employee Services 76 Citizen Service 78 Employee Relations 81 Planning, Development & Legislative Services 86 Commissioner of Planning, Development & Legislative Services 89 Economic Development 90 Region of Waterloo International Airport 95 Community Planning 101 Council & Administrative Services 106 Provincial Offences Act (POA) 111 Legal Services 112 Cultural Services 114 Region of Waterloo Library 121 Service Area Page # Transportation & Environmental Services 124 Commissioner of Transportation & Environmental Services 128 Design & Construction 129 Transportation 132 Waste Management 150 Public Transit 156 Water Services 168 Community Services 200 Commissioner of Community Services 203 Strategic and Quality Initiatives 204 Housing Services 207 Children’s Services 213 Seniors’ Services 218 Employment and Income Support 223 Public Health and Emergency
    [Show full text]
  • Grand River Transit Business Plan 2017 - 2021
    Grand River Transit Business Plan 2017 - 2021 C2015-16 September 22 2015 March 2018 Dear Friends, Since Grand River Transit (GRT) was established in January 2000, multi-year business plans have guided Council in making significant operating and capital investments in public transit, taking us from a ridership of 9.4 million in 2000 to 19.7 million in 2017. The GRT Business Plan (2017-2021) will guide the planned improvements to the Regional transit network and service levels over the next five years to achieve the Regional Transportation Master Plan ridership target of 28 million annual riders by 2021. Increasing the share of travel by transit supports the Regional goals of managing growth sustainably, improving air quality, and contributing to a thriving and liveable community. Over the next five years, GRT will experience a quantum leap as a competitive travel option for many residents of Waterloo Region. This is the result of significant improvements to the service including the start of LRT service, completion of the iXpress network, continued improvement to service levels with a focus on more frequent service, the introduction of new and enhanced passenger facilities, and the implementation of the EasyGO fare card system. The proposed transit network and annual service improvement plans will be refined annually based on public feedback and changing land use and travel patterns. The implementation of annual service improvements would then be subject to annual budget deliberations and Regional Council approvals. The new GRT Business Plan (2017-2021) builds on the successes of the previous business plans and on GRT’s solid organizational and infrastructure foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Profile of Frederick Station
    CONESTOGA NORTHFIELD FREDERICK RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO STATION AREA CHARACTERISTICS LAURIER- tahl Ave WATERLOO PARK LandWil hUseelm Plan ey St WATERLOO PUBLIC SQUARE sa St D u Ik A e W h t S on St N e r b e W n WILLIS WAY e r s t S t S t S L W Breithaupt St W Breithaupt St e ALLEN g e r t Gzowski Lane S K in m GRAND RIVER g 0 Victoria St N St 0 C HOSPITAL 0 L 1W h o Heit Lane El e c N l s l P u tn St St e e b r n i s CENTRAL STATION- e M e u te g m t a r r D e St B a e t t t INNOVATION DISTRICT W ll S e r H u t o S l g W N Luella St S l C St n a L St t C g r h a n e n h u e a a n o A t e KITCHENER e Y A u m rl h Q Mansion St e v L r e A s e a CITY HALL O H W n n St v a a s k l e c e l R G St W s b St El a o o e L e O s y l e v a r t n W tt e r a A St St n d e S e o r n o l e m t W W St St S St d St 0 n ck VICTORIA n r deri i 0 Fre E A L te 5 E a v PARK ve General Characteristics A W St N e s l St n e St ei e k io H v u r A a ta d G n • Centred around Market Square shopping centre which creates a blank wall n O QUEEN o m Sp along Frederick Street and King Street J ch S G u i o bil R St e Bingeman St e u t I • Clusters of civic and insitutional uses e o r D ri d z r v ta i e S i n n • King Street “main street” area and high quality streetscaping O s t L St FREDERICK a Chapel St n R e o M Future Population and Employment Density KITCHENER la Hohner Ave n St d id t Pl MARKET S av t S Sc t D t n H o ilto her St h Brubac Sa n e a Sc W Desired residential and job density within 800m of LRT Station e S an ll D i L s m i d
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kitchener to Cambridge
    PLANNING, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PLANNING, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kitchener to Cambridge PLANNING, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Public Consultation Centre No. 4 Holiday Inn - Kitchener May 8, 2018 4 to 8 p.m. Preston Memorial Auditorium May 9, 2018 4 to 8 p.m. Hamilton Family Theatre May 10, 2018 4 to 8 p.m. Public Information Package May 2018 PLANNING, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PLANNING, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Table of contents Section Page 1.0 .........Light Rail Transit in Waterloo Region ........................................1 PLANNING, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 2.0 .........Why are we here? .....................................................................1 3.0 .........How will my input be used? .....................................................1 4.0 .........What did we hear at the last Public Consultation ..............Centre (PCC No. 3)? .................................................................1 5.0 .........How were the route options chosen? .......................................2 5.1 .....Preliminary potential route (2017) ............................................2 5.2 .....Project team preliminary proposed route (2018) ......................2 5.3 .....Evaluation process ....................................................................3 5.4 .....Evaluation criteria .....................................................................3 5.5 .....Project team .............................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Station Profile for Laurier-Waterloo Park Station
    LAURIER-WATERLOO PARK CONESTOGA NORTHFIELD STATION AREA CHARACTERISTICS B z e a ick r l H a D ta St ry St W RESEARCH & p v Hicko m i o a T Land Use Plan Sta Pl TECHNOLOGY L a t Fir St r e Sta M c h St a te UNIVERSITY H S p General Characteristics t l e e m C OF WATERLOO St C l m r o a t ls r B c Ba t l k v LAURIER- d Su S • Directly adjacent to Waterloo Park I t n SPA 20 WATERLOO PARK SPA 34 Ph v • Wilfrid Laurier University campus to the east i e i w ll i • University of Waterloo campus to the north p St WATERLOO d g R St PUBLIC Rin e W • Waterloo Memorial Recreation Complex to the south Av ity SQUARE ne ers La niv tte U Tu Future Population and Employment Density m m lia il e 0 W Av 0 r L ke s St 0 e ic e Desired residential and job density within 800m of LRT Station: 160/hectare WILLIS WAY 1 s r m te B Ja r e St Av ker Current Laurier-Waterloo Park Station residential density: 43/hectare SPA 20 ra Noec Ez Current Laurier-Waterloo Park Station employment density: 68/hectare ALLEN r m D SPA 35 m Current Laurier-Waterloo Park Station residential and job density: 111/hectare 0 ra 0 g in 5 a Elg ne Se Cen Projected 2021 Laurier-Waterloo Park Station residential and job GRAND RIVER La tral St pus density: 127/hectare HOSPITAL E ing St W Spr ring St Sp D CENTRAL STATION- o R City of Waterloo Land Use Recommendations r INNOVATION DISTRICT s e e g t i K n W St A i a St n l KITCHENER ng b g St • Ensure that new development helps enhance the setting of and improve u e o r St Y t N CITY HALL St connectivity to the park N • Ensure that the redevelopment
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Newsletters
    Waterloo Historical Society Newsletter MARCH 2019 Marion Roes, Editor Public Meetings – All are welcome! Saturday, April 6, 1 pm Victoria Park Pavilion Doors Open at 12 80 Schneider Ave., Kitchener Please bring indoor footwear to wear if wet weather Our presenter for this meeting will be Tarah Brookfield. Tarah is a graduate of McGill University (BA), University of Waterloo (MA), and York University (PhD). Since 2009, she has been a professor of history and youth and children’s studies at Wilfrid Laurier University’s Brantford campus. Tarah’s past and current research focuses on Canadian women’s political activism, peace work, and child welfare efforts during the World Wars and Cold War. She is the author of Cold War Comforts: Canadian Women, Child Safety, and Global Insecurity (2012). She’ll be presenting on research conducted for her second book, Our Voices Must be Heard: Women and the Vote in Ontario (2018) which examines the history of suffrage activism, anti- suffragists, and Ontario’s first women voters, including some stories of women from what is now the Waterloo Region. Tarah will have her books to sell at the meeting. Next meetings Victoria Park Pavilion: Tuesday, May 21 at 7:30 pm, doors open at 6:30 Volumes will be distributed free to current members at this meeting. Note: There won’t be another newsletter before the May 21 meeting. Details will be on our web site, Facebook and Twitter. If you don’t use the internet and would like information, contact Eric Uhlmann after May 13 at the phone number on the back page.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K – Consultation
    Appendix K – Consultation NOTICE OF STUDY COMMENCEMENT Grand River Transit Northfield Drive Facility Preliminary Design and Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, Schedule ‘C’ THE STUDY: The Regional Municipality of Waterloo is undertaking the Preliminary Design and Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) Schedule ‘C’ study of a new transit facility at 300 and 350 Northfield Drive in the City of Waterloo. Grand River Transit (GRT) is continuing to expand services, consistent with the Region’s objective to increase the use of public transit. In order to accommodate growth, the Region has identified a need for a new operating facility in the City of Waterloo. The new facility will be used to deploy, service, maintain and store GRT’s conventional and specialized transit vehicles. THE PROCESS: The study will be conducted in accordance with the planning and design process for ‘Schedule C’ projects as outlined in the Municipal Engineers Association "Municipal Class Environmental Assessment," (October 2000, as amended in 2011), which is approved under the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act. The Class EA process includes public/external agency consultation, an evaluation of alternative solutions and alternative design concepts, an assessment of potential impacts associated with the proposed improvements, and development of measures to mitigate identified impacts. COMMENTS: Public participation will form an integral part of the Class EA study to ensure that the ongoing concerns of the public and affected groups within the study area are identified, documented and assessed. Upon completion of the study, an Environmental Study Report will be prepared and made available for public review and comment. Properties adjacent to the study area that may be affected by field studies as a result of the undertaking will be contacted.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Waterloo Region's 2019 Report
    MEASURING SUSTAINABLE CULTURE 2Historically0 Canadians19 have approachedYe the a sustainabilityr in challenge byReview looking at the numbers and the technology. These have been seen as the answer to our looming environmental crisis and the path forward. And so, to honour that, here are some of the numbers from 2019 for the impact of Sustainable Waterloo Region and our members and partners across this incredible community. W A T E R L O O R E G I O N EMISSIONSMEMBER PROGRAMS COMMITTED & REDUCED COMMITTED TO DATE CARBON REDUCTION WASTE DIVERSION 27 8 65 560 Member Targets Set Member Targets Set WATER REDUCTION EQUIVALENT TO TONNES OF GHG , 3 15,595 Member Targets Set Cars off the Road REDUCED TO DATE MEMBERSHIP SWR PROGRAMS 69 471 TRAVELWISE TONNES OF GHG , TOTAL FTE 55,320 49 Workforce TOTAL MEMBERS CLIMATE EMERGENCIES DECLARED BY MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVE YEARS TO CUT PERCENTAGE OF MUNICIPAL PARTICIPATION GHGs PRODUCED PER CANADIAN GLOBAL EMISSIONS EMISSIONS 100% 8 92 Partners & Supporters TOTAL MEMBERS 22 11 45% TONNES FROM 2019 FROM 2010 – 2030 EVENTSHELD IN 2019 OUTREACHSWR SOCIAL MEDIA For Canadians, and everyone globally, this past year has been one of real growth in awareness and concern about climate change. We have seen it become a conversation in political forums, social media platforms, and at our own dinner tables. More of us know the numbers, and we are OVER SOCIAL MEDIA IMPRESSIONS FOLLOWERS learning about emerging and alternative technology both of which are crucial in supporting a low carbon future. But we also know we need to do more than educate ourselves, we have to work towards real cultural change.
    [Show full text]