DOCSLIB.ORG

Partner Presence in Borno State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Partner Presence in Borno State Partner Presence in Borno State - North East Nigeria Partner Presence and Number of Beneficiaries Assisted at LGA level | December 2019 SO1 - FOOD ASSISTANCE SO2 - AGRICULTURE & LIVELIHOODS LEGEND LEGEND State Boundary State Boundary LGA Boundary LGA Boundary Hard to reach LGA Hard to reach LGA ASKIRA/UBA–60,525 7 Individuals Assisted Individuals Assisted FAO, NRC, PI, CARITAS*, No Data FREE*, UNDP, CSCED* No Data < 5,000 < 5,000 BAMA – 45,520 9 5001 – 50,000 5001 – 50,000 BOSADP*, FAO, 50,001 – 100,000 GREENCODE, DHCBI*, 50,001 – 100,000 UNDP, MCRP, HOPE, 100,001 – 200,000 WFP, INTERSOS* 100,001 – 200,000 > 300,000 BAYO – 1400 2 BAMA – 166,691 5 > 300,000 WFP, DRC*, CARITAS, JDPC INTERSOS*, MC,SEMA BIU – 75,686 11 DAMBOA – 97,325 3 IDS, VSF, CARITAS, WFP, IMC*, MC JDPC, FAO, BOSADP*, NRC, UNDP, MC, IITA*, ICRISAT* DIKWA – 35,162 3 CHIBOK – 38,419 5 WFP, CARE*, CAID* IDS, FAO, BOSADP*, CARITAS*, VSF GUBIO – 10,819 2 DAMBOA – 48,251 7 CRS, NEYIF FAO, ADRA*, NRC, MAGUMERI – 68,740 5 UNDP, MC, WFP, 4 GWOZA – 62,464 DHCBI* AAH, WFP, CRS, JDPC, MAIDUGURI – 27,413 9 WFP, PI*, CARE* INTERSOS* DIKWA – 109,324 9 FAO, DHCBI*, NEMA, LHI*, NCFRMI, SEMA, JERE – 197,086 5 MAIDUGURI– 122,841 7 FAO, BOSADP*, WFP, WFP, CAID*, NRCS, CARE*, CAID*, CRUDAN, AAH, SC, EYN, ZOA, JDPH TEARFUND, MC, DHCBI* NEMA AAH, SCI, EYN, WFP, IMC*, PUI, NEMA MOBBAR – 56,529 4 KAGA– 14,764 2 GUBIO – 30,809 4 AAH, MCRP, HOPE, NRC JERE – 203,342 19 MOBBAR – 29,000 2 AAH, CRS, FAO, NEYIF* CRS, JDPC ActionAid, HLI, FAO, KWAYA KUSAR–6,545 3 MONGUNO –262,660 15 WFP,INTERSOS* BOSADP*, LMP, DHCBI*, GWOZA – 50,388 8 CARITAS, JDPC, MC KONDUGA – 151,787 4 NRC, PALRI, SCI, WFP, AAH, HCDI, PI, MCRP, MONGUNO – 154,969 4 FAO, WFP, SWNI*, UNDP, CAID*, YAI, AAH,NEMA, MAFA – 24,671 13 HOPE, FAO, BOSADP, EYN, SCI, WFP, IMC* TEARFUND, CRUDAN, GREENCODE, ICRC, JDPC, WFP, CAID*, WFP, ACTED*, ZOA, MC, NRC, CARE, PLAN NRC, EYN, SCG UNDP, ICRC, SI, SCG, AAH, JDPH MCRP, HOPE, WFP, MAFA – 25,719 4 CARE HAWUL – 26,433 4 KAGA – 28,250 6 HCDI, CAID*, UNDP, NGALA– 83,037 3 CRUDAN, TEARFUND, NGALA – 59,529 6 SCI, EYN, WFP, DRC* FAO, DHCBI*, HCDI*, FAO, MC, NRC, UNDP FAO, BOSADP*, MC, PI, ActionAid, HLI, UNDP, FAO, BOSADP*, SI, WFP, DRC*, INTERSOS* DHCBI* ALIMA, WFP, INTERSOS* KONDUGA – 23,473 9 NGANZI – 51,246 1 MAGUMERI – 14,856 5 NGANZAI – 52,875 3 WFP, DHCBI*, SCI, HLI, AAH FAO, SC*, ActionAid, CRS, FAO, NEYIF*, JDPC AAH, GREENCODE*, HCDI*, UNDP, FAO SO1 PARTNERS SO2 PARTNERS SO1 - ASSISTED TOTAL POPULATION ASSISTED IN SO2 - CUMULATIVELY SO1 SO2 ASSISTED MODALITY BORNO STATE In-Kind 7 383K 859k Partners doing Cash/Vouchers both SO1&2 19 46 1.2M *2.2M 1.2M 824K 387k Sector’s online dashboard: The boundaries and names shown and the Disclaimer: This dashboard captures TOTAL*: It refers to unique individuals assisted Organizations*: Partners who also Production date: 31 - January - 2019 Contact: Nigeria Food Security Sector information available at the moment of (without double counts) as some beneficiaries were implement activities with FAO [email protected] https://public.tableau.com/profile/ng.food.securit designations used on this map do not imply official Data sources: FSS 5Ws data for production based on partners’ reporting. assisted under both SOs. and/or WFP. http://fscluster.org/nigeria y.sector#!/vizhome/shared/S4CCXRC39 endorsement or acceptance by the UN. December 2019 /FSS Partners Partner Presence in Yobe State - North East Nigeria Partner Presence and Number of Beneficiaries Assisted at LGA level | December 2019 SO1 - FOOD ASSISTANCE SO2 - AGRICULTURE & LIVELIHOODS BADE – 16,625 2 WFP, CCDRN* BURSARI – 15,750 4 FAO, CISCOPE*, VSF, GESDI Bade – 2,400 2 DAMATURU – 36,369 6 WFP, CCDRN* FAO, CCDRN*, CISCOPE*, WFP, COOPI*, DAMATURU – 12,625 2 MF* FIKA – 3,797 6 WFP, COOPI* AAH, SCI, CIP, GEIDAM – 13,188 2 YOSADP, HARAF, PROPCOM WFP, COOPI* FUNE – 45,155 3 GUJBA – 63,490 3 AAH, FAO, CISCOPE* AAH, WFP, CCDRN* GEIDAM – 42,752 5 FAO, CCDRN*, WFP, COOPI*, AAH GULANI – 4,388 2 WFP, CCDRN* GUJBA – 39,447 9 LEGEND CRS, NIRA, FAO, MF*, LEGEND NANGERE – 36,323 1 State Boundary CARE*, UNDP, NEMA, NANGERE – 8,854 5 State Boundary NCFRMI, SEMA AAH LGA Boundary AAH, FAO, GESDI*, LGA Boundary GULANI – 32,751 8 HARAF, PROPCOM NGURU - 1770 4 Hard to reach LGA Hard to reach LGA CRS, NIRA, FAO, CARE*, NGURU – 11,733 2 WFP, CARE* CCDRN*, NCFRMI, NEMA, Individuals Assisted SEMA WFP, CARE* Individuals Assisted No Data No Data YUNUSARI – 15,465 2 JAKUSKO – 1000 2 < 5,000 POTISKUM – 11,200 2 YUNUSARI – 52,900 8 < 5,000 WFP, CARE* VSF, GESDI 5001 – 50,000 FAO, CISCOPE* AAH, SC, CIP, 5001 – 50,000 FAO,COOPI, YOSADP*, YUSUFARI – 3,004 2 50,001 – 100,000 MACHINA – 1,171 4 50,001 – 100,000 TARMUA – 22,932 3 WFP, CARE* WFP, CARE* 100,001 – 200,000 AAH, SC, CIP, YOSADP YUSUFARI – 47,155 4 100,001 – 200,000 AAH, FAO, YOSADP* > 200,000 FAO, YOSADP*, WFP, > 200,000 CARE* SO1 SO2 PARTNERS SO1 - ASSISTED TOTAL POPULATION ASSISTED IN SO2 - CUMULATIVELY SO1 SO2 PARTNERS ASSISTED MODALITY YOBE STATE In-Kind 7 1 6K 237K Partners doing Cash/Vouchers both SO1&2 5 23 152K *422K 390K 146K 153K Sector’s online dashboard: The boundaries and names shown and the Disclaimer: This dashboard captures TOTAL*: It refers to unique individuals assisted Organizations*: Partners who Production date: 31 - January - 2019 Contact: Nigeria Food Security Sector information available at the moment of (without double counts) as some beneficiaries were also implement activities with FAO [email protected] https://public.tableau.com/profile/ng.food.securit designations used on this map do not imply official Data sources: FSS 5Ws data for production based on partners’ reporting. assisted under both SOs. and/or WFP. http://fscluster.org/nigeria y.sector#!/vizhome/shared/S4CCXRC39 endorsement or acceptance by the UN. December 2019 /FSS Partners Partner Presence in Adamawa State - North East Nigeria Partner Presence and Number of Beneficiaries Assisted at LGA level | December 2019 SO1 - FOOD ASSISTANCE SO2 - AGRICULTURE & LIVELIHOODS DEMSA – 7,000 1 HARAF FUFORE – 190 1 IOM MUBI NORTH– 18,597 7 CARITAS, JDPC, IRC, MADAGALI – 25,872 3 GIREI – 507 2 PI, DWYEI, ROPCOM, HARAF HARAF, PROPCOM DRC MUBI SOUTH – 6,158 11 2 MICHIKA – 10,087 1 GOMBI – 7,000 FAO, IRC, PI, CARITAS, DWYEI, CSCED*, JDPC, DRC FAO, CISCOPE* PROPCOM*, HARAF*, VSF, ECF GUYUK – 140 1 NUMAN – 17,500 2 HARAF FAO, ADADP* HONG – 15652 3 YOLA NORTH – 1,472 2 IRC, VSF, ECF CARITAS, JDPC, FAO MADAGALI – 41,779 7 YOLA SOUTH – 1,870 5 DRC, FAO, HARAF*, SWNI*, WFP, CARITAS, CARITAS, JDPC, JDPC HARAF, PROPCOM, MAIHA – 1,428 3 IOM LEGEND IRC, PI, DWYEI LEGEND State Boundary MICHIKA – 41,095 9 State Boundary LGA Boundary CARITAS, JDPC, FAO, LGA Boundary ADADP*, HARAF*, IRC, Hard to reach LGA PI, UNDP,PROPCOM Hard to reach LGA Individuals Assisted Individuals Assisted No Data No Data < 5,000 < 5,000 5001 – 50,000 5001 – 50,000 50,001 – 100,000 50,001 – 100,000 100,001 – 200,000 100,001 – 200,000 > 200,000 > 200,000 SO1 PARTNERS SO2 PARTNERS SO1 - ASSISTED TOTAL POPULATION ASSISTED IN SO2 - CUMULATIVELY SO1 SO2 ASSISTED MODALITY ADAMAWA STATE In-Kind 1 - 140K Partners doing Cash/Vouchers both SO1&2 1 17 36K *173K 160K 36K 20K Sector’s online dashboard: The boundaries and names shown and the Disclaimer: This dashboard captures TOTAL*: It refers to unique individuals assisted Organizations*: Partners who also Production date: 31 - January - 2019 Contact: Nigeria Food Security Sector information available at the moment of (without double counts) as some beneficiaries were implement activities with FAO [email protected] https://public.tableau.com/profile/ng.food.securit designations used on this map do not imply official Data sources: FSS 5Ws data for production based on partners’ reporting. assisted under both SOs. and/or WFP. http://fscluster.org/nigeria y.sector#!/vizhome/shared/S4CCXRC39 endorsement or acceptance by the UN. December 2019 /FSS Partners.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • Living Through Nigeria's Six-Year
    “When We Can’t See the Enemy, Civilians Become the Enemy” Living Through Nigeria’s Six-Year Insurgency About the Report This report explores the experiences of civilians and armed actors living through the conflict in northeastern Nigeria. The ultimate goal is to better understand the gaps in protection from all sides, how civilians perceive security actors, and what communities expect from those who are supposed to protect them from harm. With this understanding, we analyze the structural impediments to protecting civilians, and propose practical—and locally informed—solutions to improve civilian protection and response to the harm caused by all armed actors in this conflict. About Center for Civilians in Conflict Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) works to improve protection for civil- ians caught in conflicts around the world. We call on and advise international organizations, governments, militaries, and armed non-state actors to adopt and implement policies to prevent civilian harm. When civilians are harmed we advocate the provision of amends and post-harm assistance. We bring the voices of civilians themselves to those making decisions affecting their lives. The organization was founded as Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a courageous humanitarian killed by a suicide bomber in 2005 while advocating for Iraqi families. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] www.civiliansinconflict.org © 2015 Center for Civilians in Conflict “When We Can’t See the Enemy, Civilians Become the Enemy” Living Through Nigeria’s Six-Year Insurgency This report was authored by Kyle Dietrich, Senior Program Manager for Africa and Peacekeeping at CIVIC.
    [Show full text]
  • ETT Report-No.32.V2
    DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX - Nigeria DTM Nigeria EMERGENCY TRACKING TOOL ETT Report: No. 32 | 12–18 September 2017 IOM OIM DTM Emergency Tracking Tool (ETT) is deployed to track and provide up-to-date information on sudden displacement and other population movements New IDP arrivals recorded during the period DTM and ETT Cumulative Number of IDPs by LGA Abadam Abadam Yusufari Lake Chad Kukawa Yusufari Yunusari Mobbar Lake Chad± Nguru Karasuwa Niger Machina Yunusari Mobbar Abadam Kukawa Lake Chad Bade Guzamala 79 Nguru Karasuwa Kukawa Bursari 14,105 Geidam Gubio Bade Bade Guzamala Monguno Mobbar Nganzai Jakusko Bursari 6240 Marte Geidam Gubio Bade Guzamala Ngala Tarmua Monguno Magumeri Nganzai Jakusko Yobe 122,844 Marte 43 Gubio Monguno Jere Dikwa 7 Mafa Kala/BalgeYobe Ngala Maiduguri M.C. 122 Tarmua Nganzai Nangere Fune Damaturu Jigawa Magumeri 42,686 Borno 18 Yobe Marte Potiskum Ngala Kaga Konduga Bama Jere Mafa Kala/Balge Magumeri Dikwa 17 30 73 Yobe 49,480 Fika Gujba Nangere Fune Damaturu Maiduguri Mafa 74,858 Jere Dikwa Gwoza Potiskum Kaga Borno308,807 Kala-Balge MaiduBornoguri Damboa 799 19,619 KondugaKonduga Bama Gulani Cameroon Kag1a05,678 56,748 Chibok Konduga Fika Gujba Bama Biu 11 Madagali Askira/Uba Gwoza Michika Damboa Cameroon Kwaya Kusar 73,966Gwoza Hawul Damboa Bauchi Gombe Bayo Mubi North 76,795 Hong Gulani Shani Chibok Gombi Mubi South Madagali Biu Biu 16,378Chibok Maiha Askira/Uba Askira-Uba Inaccessible area Guyuk Song Michika Shelleng IDP severity Kwaya KusarKwaya Kusar Hawul Adamawa Hawul Less t han 10,788 Bauchi Gombe Bayo Mubi North Lamurde Number of new Bayo 10,788 - 25,813 HongAdamawa Numan Girei arrivals Shani Cameroon 25,813 - 56,749 Demsa Inaccessible area Shani Gombi Mubi South Yola South 56,749 - 122,770 Yola North Gombe 0 15 30 60 Km 122,770 Above Fufore LGAChad Adamawa Plateau Mayo-Belwa Shelleng Maiha Guyuk Song STATE: Borno 73 individuals (INDs) arrived at Bama and 129 INDs le� Bama LGA: Kaga 17 INDs arrived at NYSC Camp from Musari in Konduga LGA.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: Flash Update #2 Geidam and Yunusari Lgas, Yobe State As of 5 May 2021
    NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: Flash Update #2 Geidam and Yunusari LGAs, Yobe State As of 5 May 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • A second attack in less than a week by Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) occurred in Yobe State, this time in Kanama town, the capital of Yunusari LGA, where an estimated 30,000 people fled for safety. Kanama is about 35 kilometres from Geidam where the first attack occurred on 23 April and 150,000 people were known to flee to neighbouring towns (see Geidam Flash Update #1). • Ongoing insecurity in Geidam and Kanama towns, as well as remote locations in Yunusari, Yusufari, Bursari and Tarmua LGAs, is impeding access to IDPs. The scarcity of resources to respond to needs remains challenging for government and partners. • Multiple displacements and complex movements are impacting efforts to identify and register many of the IDPs. • New arrivals in host communities have signalled food, NFI, shelter, WASH, health and protection services among the most urgent needs. The majority of those displaced are women and children who face grave protection risks across transit and hosting sites, with several children unaccompanied and family members still missing. • The Yobe State Government, humanitarian partners, civil society organisations and host communities continue to provide critical life-saving assistance to IDPs, some repurposing resources earmarked for other programmes to facilitate rapid response to emergency needs. • Resource mobilisation efforts by State Government and partners are ongoing to ramp up life-saving response, especially as resources of host communities rapidly deplete due to the influx of IDPs. OCHA is supporting State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) to roll out LGA-level mechanisms to intensify response and identify/register the most vulnerable groups for priority assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Regional Transition Initiative (NRTI) in September 2014 to Diminish Conditions That Allow Boko Haram to Exist and Flourish in North East Nigeria
    Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) N IGERIA Annual Report: FY 2018 P ROGRAM DESCRIPTION FACT SHEET #7, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2013 JANUARY 15, 2013 The United States Agency for International Development’s Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) launched the Nigeria Regional Transition Initiative (NRTI) in September 2014 to diminish conditions that allow Boko Haram to exist and flourish in North East Nigeria. An intensified military offensive by Nigeria, along with support from Cameroon, Chad, Niger, and limited support from the United States, has enabled the Government of Nigeria to reclaim areas previously held by Boko Haram. Coupled with a peaceful change in presidency in 2015 and significant military advances, a sense of optimism loomed in North East Nigeria in the past two years. However, recent counterattacks by insurgents and the emergence of the Islamic State West Africa Province indicates that a long path to recovery still remains. In the midst of a dynamic security situation, NRTI identifies and supports activities OTI MISSION STATEMENT that positively impact citizens’ conditions while minimizing the space that allows terrorists to exist, operate, and thrive in their current environment. The program In support of US foreign currently operates through small-scale, strategically-targeted assistance to local policy, OTI seizes emerging partners in Nigeria. windows of opportunity in the political landscape to promote stability, peace, and Creative Associates International (Creative) implements NRTI under a task order democracy by catalyzing local that continues through November 2018. This annual report covers NRTI’s activities initiatives through adaptive from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018. and agile programming.
    [Show full text]
  • Borno State, Nearly Tarmuwa Magumeri Kala/ Fune Jere Mafa 60 000 People Face the Threat of Famine Balge Nangere Dikwa (Phase 5)
    N°32 SAHEL AND MAPSMARCH & FACTS 2016 WEST AFRICA Club No 44, November 2016 ONE OUT OF THREE PEOPLE IN NORTHEASTERN NIGERIA FACED WITH ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY August-September 2016 ccording to the fi ndings of the 1 Lake A Cadre harmonisé analysis of Abadam Yusufari Chad August 2016, some 4.4 million people in Yunusari Machina Mobbar Kukawa northeastern Nigeria were facing acute Nguru Karasuwa Guzamala food insecurity (phases 3-5) requiring Bade Borsari Mobbar urgent humanitarian assistance. In Bade Geidam Nganzai Monguro the worst affected and less acces- Jakusko Marte Yobe Ngala sible pockets of Borno state, nearly Tarmuwa Magumeri Kala/ Fune Jere Mafa 60 000 people face the threat of famine Balge Nangere Dikwa (phase 5). Boko Haram attacks and Damaturu Kaga Maiduguru Potiskum Konduga Bama suicide bombings continue to cause Fika Gujba fatalities and large-scale population Borno Gwoza displacement. This has had a negative Damboa Gulani impact on food consumption and Biu Chibok Madagali livelihood activities within both Askira/Uba Kwaya Michika displaced and host community house- Kusar Hawul Hong Bayo Mubi North holds. The situation continues to Shani Girie be particularly alarming in Borno, Mubi South Shelleng Maina Adamawa and Yobe which host large Song Adamawa numbers of internally displaced Lamurde people (IDPs). According to the Inter- Numan Gombi Demsa Yola North national Organization for Migration’s Yola South (IOM) June 2016 report, there are over Fufore Mayo- 1.4 million IDPs in Borno, 159 445 in Lake Abadam Bel Yusufari Chad Jada Yunusari Machina Mobbar Kukawa Adamawa and 111 671 in Yobe. New Phases of food insecurity Nguru Karasuwa Guzamala Bade Borsari Mobbar Bade Geidam Nganzai Monguro Jakusko Marte Yobe Ngala Tarmuwa Magumeri Kala/ Fune Jere Mafa Balge Nangere Dikwa Damaturu Kaga Maiduguru Potiskum Konduga Bama Fika arrivals of IDPs put additional stress Gujba Borno Gwoza Phase 1: Minimal Gulani Damboa Ganye Biu Chibok Madagali Askira/Uba Kwaya Michika Kusar Hawul Hong Bayo Mubi North Shani Girie Mubi South Shelleng Maina on host communities.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: Flash Update #1 Geidam LGA, Yobe State As of 1 May 2021
    NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: Flash Update #1 Geidam LGA, Yobe State As of 1 May 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • Up to 150,000 civilians have fled Geidam town, Yobe State, after multiple attacks occurred since 23 April 2021, targeting communities and forcing almost the entire population of the town to seek safety. • Many IDPs are in transit along routes leading to neighbouring towns in northern Yobe in Yunusari, Yusufari, Muzugun, Gashua, Nguru and its state capital, Damaturu. The state government is ensuring IDPs in transit locations, and host communities are supported, while efforts continue to contain the safety and security of Geidam town. • SEMA has mobilised local authorities and community leaders in their respective LGAs to support the response. • The Governor of Yobe State summoned an Emergency Security Meeting on 27 April, attended by government members, critical stakeholders including traditional rulers, where he highlighted the increased presence of NSAGs in the state. • An inter-agency emergency coordination centre (ECC) has been established in Gashua, Bade LGA, to facilitate and monitor response operations. • Host community households, religious groups, and volunteers are providing the first line of support to the displaced persons including shelter, cooked meals, water, sleeping mats and other basic needs. • A rapid assessment team from OCHA, with support from the government and partners, arrived in Gashua on 28 April to provide first-hand information on sector priorities. Chronology • 23 April: Geidam was attacked by suspected Non-State Armed Group (NSAG). • 29 April: Attack of Kanamma town, the administrative headquarters of Yunusari LGA, located some 35 kilometres north of Geidam town; though no civilian casualty was reported, this has raised concerns of further displacements and possible crossings of people into the neighbouring Republic of the Niger.
    [Show full text]
  • GENDER ASSESSMENT January 2020
    GENDER ASSESSMENT January 2020 Table of Contents List of graphs ....................................................................................................................................... ii List of table .......................................................................................................................................... ii Context .................................................................................................................................................... iii Objective .................................................................................................................................................. iii Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... iv Sampling .................................................................................................................................................. v Findings .................................................................................................................................................. vi Gender assessment analysis ................................................................................................................... 1 1. Socioeconomic activities and dynamics in the communities ........................................................ 2 1.1 Current daily activities of women compared to men ................................................................ 2 1.2 Type of livelihood
    [Show full text]
  • Yobe State Multisectoral Crisis Recovery Project (Mcrp)
    YOBE STATE MULTISECTORAL CRISIS RECOVERY PROJECT (MCRP) Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) For Rehabilitation of 40km Gujba-Ngalda Road INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS UNDER COMPONENT 2 OF MCRP DRAFT REPORT MARCH, 2020 Yobe MCRP – Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) for 40km Gujba-Ngalda Road Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................. v List of Tables .................................................................................................. vi Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................ vii Executive Summary ......................................................................................... ix CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 2 1.1 Background ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.1 Technical Approach and Methodology to the ESIA ................................. 3 1.1.2 Desktop Research ......................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Reconnaissance Survey and Field Visits ........................................... 3 1.2 Applicable Laws and International Regulatory Framework ........................ 4 1.3 International Treaties and Conventions on Environment ........................... 6 1.5 Gender-Based Violence ........................................................................ 7 1.5.1 International
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Boko Haram Insurgency on Agricultural Activities in Gujba Local Government Area, Yobe State, Nigeria
    Research Publisher: Manuscript central Available Online at www.ijcrr.info International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review ISSN 0976 – 4852 https://doi.org/10.15520/ijcrr.v9i12.628 December, 2018|Volume 09|Issue 12| Section: Agriculture Impacts of Boko Haram Insurgency on Agricultural Activities in Gujba Local Government Area, Yobe State, Nigeria. M. Babagana1, M. Ismail2, B. G. Mohammed3, M. A. Dilala4, Hussaini I5, I M. Zangoma6 1Department of Animal Health and Production Technology College of Agriculture Gujba Yobe State, Nigeria 2Department of Agricultural Technology College of Agriculture Gujba Yobe State, Nigeria 3Department of Agricultural Technology College of Agriculture Gujba Yobe State, Nigeria 4Department of Animal Health and Production Technology College of Agriculture Gujba Yobe State, Nigeria 5Department of Agricultural Technology College of Agriculture Gujba Yobe State, Nigeria 6Department of Agricultural Technology College of Agriculture Gujba Yobe State, Nigeria Corresponding Author: M. Babagana Received: 2018-11-14; Accepted 2018-12-06, Abstract: The study was conducted between the months of November-December 2018 to assess the impacts of Boko Haram insurgency on agricultural activities in Gujba Local Government Area of Yobe state, Nigeria. Six towns namely Buni Yadi, Gujba, Goniri, Katarko, Mutai and Wagir formed the study locations. These towns were the major agricultural strongholds of the Local Government. The study considered impacts of the insurgency on farming after the return of residents to these towns after almost two years of exile in other places as a result of displacement by the militants’ activities (2016-2018). Descriptive Survey design involving mixed methods was used in which a total of 394 respondents participated.
    [Show full text]
  • YOBE STATE MINISTRY of HEALTH Situation Report
    YOBE STATE MINISTRY OF HEALTH Situation Report TITLE COVID-19 Pandemic Situation Report SERIAL NUMBER 167 EPID-WEEK 21 DATE 24 – 30 May 2021 HIGHLIGHTS: Fifteen (15) new confirmed cases were reported in week 21 The total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases is four hundred and sixty (460) The total number of active confirmed cases is sixteen (16) Eight (8) patients have recovered, and no COVID-19 related mortality Three hundred and seventy-eight (378) samples were collected. This represents a modest improvement in the state-led sample collection and testing Yobe SPHCMB, in collaboration with WHO and partners, has commenced administration of the second dose of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine to Health Care Workers (HCWs) and strategic leaders on 29 May 2021, as a continuation of the first phase The administration of the second dose is taking place in all 17 LGAs of the state including LGAs experiencing population displacement (Geidam, Yunusari, Gujba, Gulani, Bursari, etc.) due to the activities of Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs). The vaccination is supported by 34 independent monitors (2 monitors per LGA). And from 29 - 30 May 2021, 421 people were provided with the second dose of the vaccine with 470 doses. So far, only 9 non-serious AEFIs were reported. Yobe SMOH, with support from WHO, has trained 60 HCWs on COVID-19 home-based care and management to sustain essential health services and COVD-19 care in LGAs and communities hosting a large population of IDPs from Geidam and Yunusari LGAs. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SUMMARY: The total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases is four hundred and sixty (460).
    [Show full text]
  • Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’S Enduring Insurgency
    Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’s Enduring Insurgency Editor: Jacob Zenn KASSIM BOKO HARAM BEYOND THE HEADLINES MAY 2018 CHAPTER 1: Boko Haram’s Internal Civil War: Stealth Takfir and Jihad as Recipes for Schism By Abdulbasit Kassim The jihadi insurgent movement Boko Haram has established itself as one of the relatively few jihadi movements to succeed in the capture, control, and governance of territory in Africa. Over the course of less than two decades, Boko Haram has morphed from a jihadi movement operating within Nigeria to a movement with a regional presence across multiple countries in West Africa and beyond. Since the internal civil war within the group shot into the news following the war of words between Abubakr Shekau and Muhammad Mamman Nur in August 2016, sundry observers have remained puzzled over how to describe the open competition and outright hostility that fractured the group into two factions. What is the current state of Boko Haram’s internal civil war in northern Nigeria and the Lake Chad region? This is the most frequently asked question by policymakers, scholars, and the general public interested in understanding the trajectory of the decade-old insurgency. The answer to this question has often focused on a stationary analysis of the mutual recrimination between Shekau and Nur in August 2016. Nonetheless, many events are taking place behind the scenes that can only be grasped through a close reading of the constant stream of primary sources produced by the two factions. Abu Mus`ab al-Barnawi’s
    [Show full text]