YOBE STATE MINISTRY of HEALTH Situation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

YOBE STATE MINISTRY of HEALTH Situation Report YOBE STATE MINISTRY OF HEALTH Situation Report TITLE COVID-19 Pandemic Situation Report SERIAL NUMBER 167 EPID-WEEK 21 DATE 24 – 30 May 2021 HIGHLIGHTS: Fifteen (15) new confirmed cases were reported in week 21 The total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases is four hundred and sixty (460) The total number of active confirmed cases is sixteen (16) Eight (8) patients have recovered, and no COVID-19 related mortality Three hundred and seventy-eight (378) samples were collected. This represents a modest improvement in the state-led sample collection and testing Yobe SPHCMB, in collaboration with WHO and partners, has commenced administration of the second dose of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine to Health Care Workers (HCWs) and strategic leaders on 29 May 2021, as a continuation of the first phase The administration of the second dose is taking place in all 17 LGAs of the state including LGAs experiencing population displacement (Geidam, Yunusari, Gujba, Gulani, Bursari, etc.) due to the activities of Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs). The vaccination is supported by 34 independent monitors (2 monitors per LGA). And from 29 - 30 May 2021, 421 people were provided with the second dose of the vaccine with 470 doses. So far, only 9 non-serious AEFIs were reported. Yobe SMOH, with support from WHO, has trained 60 HCWs on COVID-19 home-based care and management to sustain essential health services and COVD-19 care in LGAs and communities hosting a large population of IDPs from Geidam and Yunusari LGAs. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SUMMARY: The total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases is four hundred and sixty (460). Ninety-three (93) cases from Damaturu, seventy-four (74) cases from Nguru, forty-three (43) cases from Fika, forty (40) cases from Potiskum, thirty-six (36) cases from Bade, thirty (30) cases from Nangere, twenty-one (21) cases from Yusufari, twenty (20) cases from Gulani, nineteen (19) cases from Jakusko, seventeen (17) cases 1 | P a g e each from Gujba, sixteen (16) cases each from Karasuwa, fourteen (14) cases from Tarmuwa, eleven (11) cases from Fune, eight (8) cases each from Bursari, and Yunusari, and five (5) cases each from Geidam, and Machina LGAs The total number of active confirmed cases in the state is sixteen (16) The total confirmed cases of COVID-19 amongst Health Care Workers (HCWs) is nineteen (19). These include nine (9) doctors, seven (7) nurses, one (1) physiotherapist, and two (2) laboratory scientists The total number of deaths from COVID-19 in the state is nine (9) The total number of patients who recovered from COVID-19 is four hundred and thirty-five (435) The total number of contacts who completed 14 days of monitoring without symptoms is two thousand, one hundred and twenty-six (2,126) The total number of samples collected is seventeen thousand, two hundred and seventy-two (17,272). Four hundred and sixty (460) results are positive, fifteen thousand, four hundred and forty-one (15,441) are negative, forty-two (42) for a repeat test, and one thousand, three hundred, and twenty-nine (1,329) remaining sample results are pending. 40 35 30 25 19 confirmed cases - 20 15 10 Number COVID of 5 0 7-Jul-20 3-Jan-21 1-Jun-20 8-Jun-20 4-Oct-20 7-Feb-21 4-Apr-21 7-Sep-20 6-Dec-20 3-Aug-20 8-Aug-20 13-Jul-20 20-Jul-20 27-Jul-20 1-Nov-20 8-Nov-20 7-Mar-21 4-May-20 2-May-21 9-May-21 10-Jan-21 17-Jan-21 24-Jan-21 31-Jan-21 15-Jun-20 22-Jun-20 29-Jun-20 11-Oct-20 18-Oct-20 25-Oct-20 27-Apr-20 14-Feb-21 21-Feb-21 28-Feb-21 11-Apr-21 25-Apr-21 14-Sep-20 20-Sep-20 27-Sep-29 13-Dec-20 20-Dec-20 27-Dec-20 17-Aug-20 31-Aug-20 15-Nov-20 22-Nov-20 29-Nov-20 14-Mar-21 21-Mar-21 28-Mar-21 11-May-20 18-May-20 25-May-20 16-May-21 18-Apr-21* 23-May-21* Confirmed COVID-19 Deaths Figure 1: Epi-curve of Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in Yobe state 2 | P a g e 3000 80% 70% 2500 60% 2000 50% 1500 40% test test and cases 30% 1000 rate positivity % test 20% 500 10% 0 0% weeks Tests Confirmed COVID-19 %Positivity Rate Figure 2: Trend in the weekly testing, number of confirmed cases, and positivity rates in Yobe state 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Number confirmed Number cases of 20 10 0 LGAs Figure 3: Distribution of Confirmed COVID-19 Cases by LGA in Yobe state 3 | P a g e Table 1: Summary of COVID-19 Case(s) Total Epi-week 21 Cumulative (1 Jan 2020- S/No. (Monday-Sunday) 30 May 2021) Description 1 Suspected case(s) 378 17,230 2 Lab-confirmed positive case(s) 15 460 Lab-confirmed positive cases amongst 3 health care worker(s) 0 19 4 Probable case(s) 0 0 5 Rumor under investigation 0 4,839 6 Number of confirmed case(s) discharged 8 435 7 Number of death in confirmed case(s) 0 9 Number of death amongst health care 8 workers 0 0 9 Number of death in suspected cases 0 0 Table 2: Summary of Contact(s) Total epi-week 21 Cumulative (1 Jan S/No. Description (Monday-Sunday) 2020 - 30 May 2021) 1 Contact(s) line-listed 0 2,147 2 Contact(s) seen 0 2,126 3 Contact(s) currently under follow-up 0 0 4 Symptomatic contacts(s) 0 31 5 Contact confirmed positive 0 18 6 Contact(s) who completed 14 days follow-up 0 2,126 7 Contact(s) lost to follow up 0 0 4 | P a g e Figure 2: Risk Mapping of Yobe LGAs Figure 3: Map of Yobe State Showing the Number of Laboratory Confirmed COVID-19 Cases by LGA. 5 | P a g e Table 3: Summary of Laboratory Result(s) Total epi-week 21 Cumulative (1 Jan (Monday-Sunday) 2020 - 30 May 2021) S/No. Description 1 Total number of samples collected 378 17,272 2 Number of samples tested negative 185 15,441 3 The number of samples confirmed positive 15 446 4 Number of samples pending in the laboratory 178 1,329 5 Number of samples for a repeat test 0 42 THEMATIC INTERVENTIONS Coordination: The SMOH, with the support of WHO and partners, is coordinating the implementation of COVID-19 response activities in all LGAs of the state Conducted regular COVID-19 response coordination meetings with partners and stakeholders. Surveillance and Epidemiology: All 17 LGAs have recorded at least a confirmed COVID-19 case (s) The case fatality rate amongst confirmed cases is 2.0% The positivity rate for week 21 is 2.3%. This represents an increase in positivity rate compared to the previous week (0.34% positivity rate in week 20). The case to contact ratio is 1:5 The percentage of contacts that were confirmed positive is 3.9%. Point of Entry (POE): Conducted screening of passengers at the Points of Entries (POEs) Conducted supportive supervision at the POE in Potiskum, Nangere, Bade, and Nguru LGAs. Case Management: The total number of active confirmed cases in the state is sixteen (16) Eight (8) patients have recovered, and no COVID-19 related mortality. Infection Prevention and Control (IPC): Conducted decontamination and disinfection of SSH molecular diagnostic laboratory, SSH Damaturu, and FMC Nguru Isolation centers Conducted sensitization on uptake of COVID-19 second dose vaccination. 6 | P a g e Laboratory and Diagnostic Support: Following up with the laboratory team to retrieve pending sample results The total number of samples collected is seventeen thousand, two hundred and seventy-two (17,272). Four hundred and sixty (460) results are positive, fifteen thousand, four hundred and forty-one (15,441) are negative, forty-two (42) for a repeat test, and one thousand, three hundred, and twenty-nine (1,329) remaining sample results are pending. Risk Communication and Social Mobilization: Yobe SHCMB, in collaboration with WHO HTR teams, Community Health Champions and AVADAR Informants, UNICEF, and CGPP VCMs, conducted mass community sensitization, reaching 6,402 people with COVID-19 prevention messages. Logistics and Operational Support: Distributed COVID-19 IPC commodities to SSH molecular diagnostic laboratory, and YSUTH Damaturu Distributed PPEs and IEC materials to the IPC, Surveillance, POE, and Risk Communication teams. CHALLENGES: Massive population displacement and attacks on hospitals and PHC centers by the Non-state Armed Groups (NSAGs) are disrupting COVID-19 response and health services in affected LGAs (Geidam, Yunusari, and Gujba LGAs) Insecurity and military operations are limiting contact tracing, active case search, and community sensitization in security-compromised LGAs Bad geographical is limiting access to remote communities to sustain COVID-19 prevention activities. NEXT STEP(S): Continue providing the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine to health workers and strategic leaders Scale-up Hard-To-Reach (HTR) mobile health services in Yunusari and Geidam LGAs to mitigate the impacts of disruption of health services Provide additional support for active case search strategy, contact tracing, and sample collection in high- burden LGAs Continue sensitization and capacity building for community stakeholders to reduce fear and stigmatization, and lead COVID-19 control efforts in remote and security-compromised communities. 7 | P a g e .
Recommended publications
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: Flash Update #2 Geidam and Yunusari Lgas, Yobe State As of 5 May 2021
    NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: Flash Update #2 Geidam and Yunusari LGAs, Yobe State As of 5 May 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • A second attack in less than a week by Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) occurred in Yobe State, this time in Kanama town, the capital of Yunusari LGA, where an estimated 30,000 people fled for safety. Kanama is about 35 kilometres from Geidam where the first attack occurred on 23 April and 150,000 people were known to flee to neighbouring towns (see Geidam Flash Update #1). • Ongoing insecurity in Geidam and Kanama towns, as well as remote locations in Yunusari, Yusufari, Bursari and Tarmua LGAs, is impeding access to IDPs. The scarcity of resources to respond to needs remains challenging for government and partners. • Multiple displacements and complex movements are impacting efforts to identify and register many of the IDPs. • New arrivals in host communities have signalled food, NFI, shelter, WASH, health and protection services among the most urgent needs. The majority of those displaced are women and children who face grave protection risks across transit and hosting sites, with several children unaccompanied and family members still missing. • The Yobe State Government, humanitarian partners, civil society organisations and host communities continue to provide critical life-saving assistance to IDPs, some repurposing resources earmarked for other programmes to facilitate rapid response to emergency needs. • Resource mobilisation efforts by State Government and partners are ongoing to ramp up life-saving response, especially as resources of host communities rapidly deplete due to the influx of IDPs. OCHA is supporting State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) to roll out LGA-level mechanisms to intensify response and identify/register the most vulnerable groups for priority assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Regional Transition Initiative (NRTI) in September 2014 to Diminish Conditions That Allow Boko Haram to Exist and Flourish in North East Nigeria
    Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) N IGERIA Annual Report: FY 2018 P ROGRAM DESCRIPTION FACT SHEET #7, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2013 JANUARY 15, 2013 The United States Agency for International Development’s Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) launched the Nigeria Regional Transition Initiative (NRTI) in September 2014 to diminish conditions that allow Boko Haram to exist and flourish in North East Nigeria. An intensified military offensive by Nigeria, along with support from Cameroon, Chad, Niger, and limited support from the United States, has enabled the Government of Nigeria to reclaim areas previously held by Boko Haram. Coupled with a peaceful change in presidency in 2015 and significant military advances, a sense of optimism loomed in North East Nigeria in the past two years. However, recent counterattacks by insurgents and the emergence of the Islamic State West Africa Province indicates that a long path to recovery still remains. In the midst of a dynamic security situation, NRTI identifies and supports activities OTI MISSION STATEMENT that positively impact citizens’ conditions while minimizing the space that allows terrorists to exist, operate, and thrive in their current environment. The program In support of US foreign currently operates through small-scale, strategically-targeted assistance to local policy, OTI seizes emerging partners in Nigeria. windows of opportunity in the political landscape to promote stability, peace, and Creative Associates International (Creative) implements NRTI under a task order democracy by catalyzing local that continues through November 2018. This annual report covers NRTI’s activities initiatives through adaptive from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018. and agile programming.
    [Show full text]
  • Borno State, Nearly Tarmuwa Magumeri Kala/ Fune Jere Mafa 60 000 People Face the Threat of Famine Balge Nangere Dikwa (Phase 5)
    N°32 SAHEL AND MAPSMARCH & FACTS 2016 WEST AFRICA Club No 44, November 2016 ONE OUT OF THREE PEOPLE IN NORTHEASTERN NIGERIA FACED WITH ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY August-September 2016 ccording to the fi ndings of the 1 Lake A Cadre harmonisé analysis of Abadam Yusufari Chad August 2016, some 4.4 million people in Yunusari Machina Mobbar Kukawa northeastern Nigeria were facing acute Nguru Karasuwa Guzamala food insecurity (phases 3-5) requiring Bade Borsari Mobbar urgent humanitarian assistance. In Bade Geidam Nganzai Monguro the worst affected and less acces- Jakusko Marte Yobe Ngala sible pockets of Borno state, nearly Tarmuwa Magumeri Kala/ Fune Jere Mafa 60 000 people face the threat of famine Balge Nangere Dikwa (phase 5). Boko Haram attacks and Damaturu Kaga Maiduguru Potiskum Konduga Bama suicide bombings continue to cause Fika Gujba fatalities and large-scale population Borno Gwoza displacement. This has had a negative Damboa Gulani impact on food consumption and Biu Chibok Madagali livelihood activities within both Askira/Uba Kwaya Michika displaced and host community house- Kusar Hawul Hong Bayo Mubi North holds. The situation continues to Shani Girie be particularly alarming in Borno, Mubi South Shelleng Maina Adamawa and Yobe which host large Song Adamawa numbers of internally displaced Lamurde people (IDPs). According to the Inter- Numan Gombi Demsa Yola North national Organization for Migration’s Yola South (IOM) June 2016 report, there are over Fufore Mayo- 1.4 million IDPs in Borno, 159 445 in Lake Abadam Bel Yusufari Chad Jada Yunusari Machina Mobbar Kukawa Adamawa and 111 671 in Yobe. New Phases of food insecurity Nguru Karasuwa Guzamala Bade Borsari Mobbar Bade Geidam Nganzai Monguro Jakusko Marte Yobe Ngala Tarmuwa Magumeri Kala/ Fune Jere Mafa Balge Nangere Dikwa Damaturu Kaga Maiduguru Potiskum Konduga Bama Fika arrivals of IDPs put additional stress Gujba Borno Gwoza Phase 1: Minimal Gulani Damboa Ganye Biu Chibok Madagali Askira/Uba Kwaya Michika Kusar Hawul Hong Bayo Mubi North Shani Girie Mubi South Shelleng Maina on host communities.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: Flash Update #1 Geidam LGA, Yobe State As of 1 May 2021
    NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: Flash Update #1 Geidam LGA, Yobe State As of 1 May 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • Up to 150,000 civilians have fled Geidam town, Yobe State, after multiple attacks occurred since 23 April 2021, targeting communities and forcing almost the entire population of the town to seek safety. • Many IDPs are in transit along routes leading to neighbouring towns in northern Yobe in Yunusari, Yusufari, Muzugun, Gashua, Nguru and its state capital, Damaturu. The state government is ensuring IDPs in transit locations, and host communities are supported, while efforts continue to contain the safety and security of Geidam town. • SEMA has mobilised local authorities and community leaders in their respective LGAs to support the response. • The Governor of Yobe State summoned an Emergency Security Meeting on 27 April, attended by government members, critical stakeholders including traditional rulers, where he highlighted the increased presence of NSAGs in the state. • An inter-agency emergency coordination centre (ECC) has been established in Gashua, Bade LGA, to facilitate and monitor response operations. • Host community households, religious groups, and volunteers are providing the first line of support to the displaced persons including shelter, cooked meals, water, sleeping mats and other basic needs. • A rapid assessment team from OCHA, with support from the government and partners, arrived in Gashua on 28 April to provide first-hand information on sector priorities. Chronology • 23 April: Geidam was attacked by suspected Non-State Armed Group (NSAG). • 29 April: Attack of Kanamma town, the administrative headquarters of Yunusari LGA, located some 35 kilometres north of Geidam town; though no civilian casualty was reported, this has raised concerns of further displacements and possible crossings of people into the neighbouring Republic of the Niger.
    [Show full text]
  • Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’S Enduring Insurgency
    Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’s Enduring Insurgency Editor: Jacob Zenn KASSIM BOKO HARAM BEYOND THE HEADLINES MAY 2018 CHAPTER 1: Boko Haram’s Internal Civil War: Stealth Takfir and Jihad as Recipes for Schism By Abdulbasit Kassim The jihadi insurgent movement Boko Haram has established itself as one of the relatively few jihadi movements to succeed in the capture, control, and governance of territory in Africa. Over the course of less than two decades, Boko Haram has morphed from a jihadi movement operating within Nigeria to a movement with a regional presence across multiple countries in West Africa and beyond. Since the internal civil war within the group shot into the news following the war of words between Abubakr Shekau and Muhammad Mamman Nur in August 2016, sundry observers have remained puzzled over how to describe the open competition and outright hostility that fractured the group into two factions. What is the current state of Boko Haram’s internal civil war in northern Nigeria and the Lake Chad region? This is the most frequently asked question by policymakers, scholars, and the general public interested in understanding the trajectory of the decade-old insurgency. The answer to this question has often focused on a stationary analysis of the mutual recrimination between Shekau and Nur in August 2016. Nonetheless, many events are taking place behind the scenes that can only be grasped through a close reading of the constant stream of primary sources produced by the two factions. Abu Mus`ab al-Barnawi’s
    [Show full text]
  • Partner Presence in Borno State
    Partner Presence in Borno State - North East Nigeria Partner Presence and Number of Beneficiaries Assisted at LGA level | December 2019 SO1 - FOOD ASSISTANCE SO2 - AGRICULTURE & LIVELIHOODS LEGEND LEGEND State Boundary State Boundary LGA Boundary LGA Boundary Hard to reach LGA Hard to reach LGA ASKIRA/UBA–60,525 7 Individuals Assisted Individuals Assisted FAO, NRC, PI, CARITAS*, No Data FREE*, UNDP, CSCED* No Data < 5,000 < 5,000 BAMA – 45,520 9 5001 – 50,000 5001 – 50,000 BOSADP*, FAO, 50,001 – 100,000 GREENCODE, DHCBI*, 50,001 – 100,000 UNDP, MCRP, HOPE, 100,001 – 200,000 WFP, INTERSOS* 100,001 – 200,000 > 300,000 BAYO – 1400 2 BAMA – 166,691 5 > 300,000 WFP, DRC*, CARITAS, JDPC INTERSOS*, MC,SEMA BIU – 75,686 11 DAMBOA – 97,325 3 IDS, VSF, CARITAS, WFP, IMC*, MC JDPC, FAO, BOSADP*, NRC, UNDP, MC, IITA*, ICRISAT* DIKWA – 35,162 3 CHIBOK – 38,419 5 WFP, CARE*, CAID* IDS, FAO, BOSADP*, CARITAS*, VSF GUBIO – 10,819 2 DAMBOA – 48,251 7 CRS, NEYIF FAO, ADRA*, NRC, MAGUMERI – 68,740 5 UNDP, MC, WFP, 4 GWOZA – 62,464 DHCBI* AAH, WFP, CRS, JDPC, MAIDUGURI – 27,413 9 WFP, PI*, CARE* INTERSOS* DIKWA – 109,324 9 FAO, DHCBI*, NEMA, LHI*, NCFRMI, SEMA, JERE – 197,086 5 MAIDUGURI– 122,841 7 FAO, BOSADP*, WFP, WFP, CAID*, NRCS, CARE*, CAID*, CRUDAN, AAH, SC, EYN, ZOA, JDPH TEARFUND, MC, DHCBI* NEMA AAH, SCI, EYN, WFP, IMC*, PUI, NEMA MOBBAR – 56,529 4 KAGA– 14,764 2 GUBIO – 30,809 4 AAH, MCRP, HOPE, NRC JERE – 203,342 19 MOBBAR – 29,000 2 AAH, CRS, FAO, NEYIF* CRS, JDPC ActionAid, HLI, FAO, KWAYA KUSAR–6,545 3 MONGUNO –262,660 15 WFP,INTERSOS* BOSADP*,
    [Show full text]
  • April – June 2020
    Nigeria: Yobe - Health Sector Reporting Partners (April - June, 2020) Number of Local Reporting PARTNERS PER TYPE OF ORGANIZATIONS BREAKDOWN OF PEOPLE REACHED PER CATEGORY Government Area Partners NGOs/UN People Reached PiN/Target IDP Returnee Host 08 Agencies Community 17 Partners including 204,102 LGAs with ongoing International NGOs and activities 87,507 10,531 165 76,811 UN Agencies 4/4 151,047 KARASUWA (1 Partner) YUSUFARI (2 Partners) YUNUSARI (1 Partner) WHO PLAN, WHO WHO REACHED: 713 REACHED: 1,558 REACHED: 3,377 MACHINA (1 Partner) YUSUFARI GEIDAM (1 Partner) WHO YUNUSARI WHO NGURU REACHED: 1,068 MACHINA REACHED: 6,539 KARASUWA BADE BURSARI (2 Partners) NGURU (2 Partners) BURSARI PLAN, WHO PLAN, WHO BADE GEIDAM REACHED: 2,458 REACHED: 1,715 JAKUSKO TARMUA (2 Partners) BADE (1 Partner) TARMUA WHO AAH, WHO REACHED: 6,625 REACHED: 1,092 DAMATURU NANGERE DAMATURU (5 Partners) JAKUSKO (1 Partner) POTISKUM IRC, PLAN, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO WHO FUNE REACHED: 9,705 REACHED: 1,815 FIKA GUJBA GUJBA (5 Partners) NANGERE (2 Partners) AAH, IOM, IRC, UNICEF, WHO AAH, WHO GULANI Number of Organizations REACHED: 24,292 REACHED: 5,525 0 5 GULANI (3 Partners)P POTISKUM (2 Partners) IOM, UNICEF, WHO RHHF, UNFPA REACHED: 17,229 REACHED: 23 FIKA (1 Partner) FUNE (2 Partners) .WHO PLAN, WHO REACHED: 2,769 REACHED: 1,105 ORGANIZATION ACRONYMS AAH Action Against Hunger YOBE Reached Benificiaries by Age CRS Catholic Relief Services Number of Individuals Displaced FHI 360 Family Health International by Insurgency 127,613 24,000 IFRC International Federation of Red Cross 20,000 IRC International Rescue Commitee 16,000 Estimated Number of IDPs 12,000 MSF - Spain Medecin Sans Frontieres Spain 133,183 8,000 UNFPA United Nations Population Fund 4,000 UNICEF United Nations Children's Education Fund Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Women Men Women Men Children (Under 1 years) Children (1 - 5 years) Children (6 - 17 years) Adults (18 - 59 years) Elderly (60+ years) WHO World Health Organization * DTM baseline assessment round XXXI OUR PARTNERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Document for Support for Early Recovery from Conflict and Resilience Building in Yobe State
    EN This action is funded by the European Union ANNEX of the Commission Decision on the Annual Action Programme 2018 in favour of Nigeria to be financed from the 11th European Development Fund Action Document for Support for early recovery from conflict and resilience building in Yobe State INFORMATION FOR POTENTIAL GRANT APPLICANTS WORK PROGRAMME FOR GRANTS This document constitutes the work programme for grants in the sense of Article 110(2) of the Financial Regulation, applicable to the EDF in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) 2015/323 in the following section concerning grants awarded directly without a call for proposals: 5.4.1 1. Title/basic act/ EU Support for early recovery from conflict and resilience building in Yobe CRIS number State CRIS number: NG/FED/041-261 financed under the 11th European Development Fund (EDF) 2. Zone benefiting Nigeria, Yobe State from the action/location 3. Programming National Indicative Programme (NIP) of the 11thEDF - 2014-2020 for Nigeria document 4. Sector of Sector 3: Health, Nutrition & DEV. Aid: YES concentration/ Resilience thematic area 5. Amounts Total estimated cost: EUR 30 000 000 concerned Total amount of EDF-NIP contribution: EUR 30 000 000 6. Aid Project Modality: modality(ies) Direct Management – Grants: direct award and Indirect Management with the World Bank implementation modality(ies) 7 a) DAC code(s) 16010 – Social/welfare services; 40 % 31120 – Agricultural development; 40 % 15110 – Public sector policy and administrative management; 20 % b) Main Delivery 21000 –
    [Show full text]
  • Artboard 1Yobe State COVID-19 Risk
    Nigeria: Yobe State - COVID-19 Risk Map for LGAs Number of Local Partners Government Area Presence NGOs/UN 17 14 Agencies LGAs with ongoing Partners including activities International NGOs, National NGOs and UN Agencies 11/3 KARASUWA (4 Partners) YUSUFARI (4 Partners) YUNUSARI (4 Partners) CRS, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO CRS, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO MSF-Spain, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO MACHINA (4 Partners) YUSUFARI GEIDAM (4 Partners) CRS, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO YUNUSARI MACHINA CRS, UNFPA, UNICEF,WHO NGURU KARASUWA BADE BURSARI (5 Partners) NGURU (6 Partners) BURSARI CRS, FHI360, IHVN, UNFPA, CRS, FHI360, GESDI, UNFPA, BADE GEIDAM UNICEF, WHO UNICEF, WHO JAKUSKO TARMUA (5 Partners) BADE (6 Partners) TARMUA GESDI, NEYIF, UNFPA, AAH, FHI360, GESDI, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO UNICEF, WHO DAMATURU NANGERE DAMATURU (8 Partners) JAKUSKO (4 Partners) POTISKUM FHI360, IHVN, IRC, MC, NRC, COOPI, UNFPA, UNICEF, MSF-Spain, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO FUNE WHO FIKA GUJBA GUJBA (8 Partners) NANGERE (3 Partners) AAH, ICRC, IRC, NRC/IFRC, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO GULANI MC, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO GULANI (8 Partners) POTISKUM (5 Partners) AAH, ICRC, IRC, NRC/IFRC, AAH, FHI360, UNFPA, MC, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO UNICEF, WHO FIKA (5 Partners) FUNE (5 Partners) FHI360, GESDI, UNFPA, . CRS, NRC/IFRC, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO UNICEF, WHO ORGANIZATION ACRONYMS IHVN Institute of Human Virology of Nigeria COVID-19: Risk Level AAH Action Against Hunger IRC International Rescue Commitee COOPI COOperazione Internationale MC Malaria Consortium Medium Risk CRS Catholic Relief Services MSF - Spain Medecin Sans Frontieres Spain High Risk FHI 360 Family Health International NEYIF North East Youth Initiative For Development L NRCS Nigerian Red Cross Society Very High Risk GESDI Green Environmental Sustainability & Development Initiative UNFPA United Nations Population Fund ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross UNICEF United Nations Children's Emergency Fund IFRC International Federation of Red Cross & WHO World Health Organization Red Crescent Societies OUR PARTNERS.
    [Show full text]
  • MC Short Report
    BUILDING RESILIENCE IN COMPLEX CRISIS(BRICC) BASELINE REPORT MARCH 2020 Funded by the European Union Table of Contents PROGRAM BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary 3 Research Methods 4 Research design and Rationale 4 Multi Phase Baseline Assessment 4 Research Approach 5 Study Population 5 Sampling Inclusion and Exclusion 6 Research tool, Techniques and Language 6 Participants Recruitment 7 Data Management, Analysis and Reporting 7 Presentation of Key findings 7 Conclusion 22 BRICC Logframe 28 BRICC Consortium Baseline Report 2 Funded by the European Union Program Background The European Union’s (EU) funded Building Resilience In Complex Crisis (BRICC) programme seek to build the absorptive and adaptive capacities of 26,875 households in Yobe state to be resilient to the shock and stresses of conflict, market disruptions, climate change and complex crisis. The programme will also transform the underlying casual dynamics to reduce the risks of future conflict by engaging communities and local leadership to create conditions to facilitate systemic change. Mercy Corps is leveraging its expertise in fostering resilience in complex environments both globally and in Northeast Nigeria, with its partners Cooperazione Internationale (COOPI) and the Danish Refugee Council (DRC)’s whose strong track record of relief and early recovery programs in Yobe state, will enable the consortium to rapidly start up and implement the BRICC program. BRICC’s ToC is IF communities most affected by conflict in Yobe state have improved social protection delivered through responsive, capable government, access to essential basic services and improved livelihood supported by robust markets, and IF key community leaders and government institutions manage resources, services and conflict peacefully and equitably while addressing drivers of participation of violence, THEN communities will achieve increasing well-being over time and experience the impacts of conflict less severely.
    [Show full text]
  • Yerima and Umar 149
    Direct Research Journal of Social Science and Educational Studies Vol. 7 (6), pp. 148-152, July 2020 ISSN 2449-0806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26765/DRJSSES2274526973 Article Number: DRJSSES2274526973 Copyright © 2020 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article https://directresearchpublisher.org/drjsses/ Review Paper The Place of Bade Emirate in the Promotion of Islamic Learning and Social Integration, 1946-2015 1Abubakar Yerima and *2Muhammad Zayyad Umar 1Department of History Umar Suleiman College of Education Gashua, Nigeria. 2Department of Remedial Studies Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic Katsina, Nigeria. *Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received 5 June 2020; Accepted 22 July, 2020 ABSTRACT: Bade Emirate is one of the oldest then Gorgaram, mainly to teach, lead prayer, preach established Emirates in Northern Nigeria. The name of and judge cases based on Islamic teachings. Bade’s the Emirate and the tribe is supposedly derived from geographical location as the northern most buffer area the name of a town called Badr in Saudi Arabia, a between Kanem-Borno and Sokoto Caliphate, two place which was said to be the original home of Bade powerful Islamic kingdoms made it unique in the people before their migration to the present growth of Islam. This article, therefore, highlights the settlement in Yobe State, Nigeria. The teaching of roles played by the Bade rulers and its community in Qur’anic education and Islamic Jurisprudence in Bade the promotion of Islam and social integration in the Emirate could be said to have started during the reign Bade-land. of Mai Sale I, (1897-1919) when he sought and brought an Islamic scholar from Damgaram in present day Niger Republic, Abubakar Mustapha, to Bade in c.
    [Show full text]