DOCSLIB.ORG

Indigenous Design Issuesceduna Aboriginal Children and Family

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indigenous Design Issuesceduna Aboriginal Children and Family INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 1 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 2 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWELDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: PRECEDENTS AND “BEST PRACTICE„ DESIGN ....................................................10 The Design of Early Learning, Child-care and Children and Family Centres for Aboriginal People ..................................................................................................................................10 Conceptions of Quality ........................................................................................................ 10 Precedents: Pre-Schools, Kindergartens, Child and Family Centres ..................................12 Kulai Aboriginal Preschool .............................................................................................. 12 The Djidi Djidi Aboriginal School ......................................................................................13 Waimea Kohanga Reo Victory School .............................................................................15 Mnjikaning First Nation Early Childhood Education Centre .............................................16 Native Child and Family Services of Toronto ...................................................................17 Mana Tamariki, Palmerston North, New Zealand ............................................................19 Existing Aboriginal Children and Family Centres in South Australia ................................. 21 Kaurna Plains Family Centre, Elizabeth ...........................................................................22 Tinyeri Children‟s Centre for Early Childhood Development and Parenting, Murray Bridge ...............................................................................................................................23 Pukatja Aboriginal Children and Family Centre ...............................................................27 PART 2: SITE ANALYSIS .........................................................................................................31 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................31 Site Description ....................................................................................................................32 Brief History of the Area .......................................................................................................36 Cultural Significance.............................................................................................................45 Existing Community Capacity ..............................................................................................48 PART 3: PROFILE OF THE USER GROUP .............................................................................51 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................51 Regional Mobility Patterns ...................................................................................................51 Age Demographics of Users ................................................................................................52 Language Groupings of the Users .......................................................................................53 Characteristics of the Users .................................................................................................53 Socio-spatial Needs of Users ...............................................................................................55 3 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ PART 4: DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................57 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................57 General Principles ................................................................................................................59 Design Recommendations for areas within the Children and Family Centre ......................67 Entry .................................................................................................................................67 Design Recommendations for entry ascertained through consultation with potential users .................................................................................................................................68 Reception .........................................................................................................................68 Staff Room........................................................................................................................71 Children„s Space ........................................................................................................ 72 Learning Together/Community Room ..............................................................................78 Consulting Rooms ............................................................................................................80 Meeting Room ..................................................................................................................81 Drop in area/resource area ..............................................................................................82 Laundry .............................................................................................................................82 Kitchen ..............................................................................................................................82 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................84 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................86 APPENDIX 1: ABORIGINAL REGIONS & LANGUAGES, EYRE PENINSULA .......................91 APPENDIX 2: SITE PLANS ......................................................................................................92 APPENDIX 3: RECORD OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ....................................................94 APPENDIX 4: ARTIST PROFILES ............................................................................................99 4 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ PREFACE This report was commissioned by the Department of Transport, Energy and Infrastructure (DTEI) South Australia as part of the preliminary design process for the Ceduna Aboriginal Children and Family Centre. This report aims to provide deeper understandings of the Indigenous design issues for the design team including preliminary comments to inform the design process which are not exhaustive. This report is not intended to replace direct consultation or discussion on various aspects of the design. This report was prepared simultaneously to reports prepared as part of the design processes for Aboriginal Children and Family Centres at Whyalla and Christies Beach. Sections for each report may include similar material where appropriate. The terms 'Aboriginal„ and 'Indigenous„ have been used throughout this report to refer inclusively to both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. ACKNOWELDGEMENTS The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of the following people in preparing this report: Debbie Moyle, Michael Colbung and Graeme Allen (Department of Education and Children„s Services) and the enabling committee for the Ceduna Aboriginal Children and Family Centre, Mitch Dunnett (Far West Coast Native Title Group), Paul Monaghan (The University of Adelaide), Pam Diment (Ceduna Aboriginal Arts and Culture Centre), Tony La Broome, Patricia and Zane Gunter (Interpreters), Alana Smith (parent representative and ICC) Heathe Champion (ICC and parent representative), Miriam Bjelovarac and staff (Tinyeri Children's Centre for Early Childhood Development and Parenting), Megan Hickman (Kaurna Plains Children„s Centre), staff and residents (Ceduna Town Camp), staff and students (OSHC, Crossways Lutheran School), Kerry Colbung, Jarah Colbung (Ceduna Koonibba Aboriginal Health Service), Mavis Miller, Gwen Miller, (Minya Bunhii Child Care Centre), Tracey Vincent (Ceduna Indigenous Women's Centre), Estelle Miller (Far West Aboriginal Language Centre), Leonard Miller, Joy Reid (Save the Children), Sharon Woods (Ceduna Preschool) and Veronica Burgoyne and Malcolm Bilney (Families SA). The author would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr Helen Bennetts in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Trachoma Surveillance and Reporting Unit Trachoma Surveillance Report 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    NATIONAL TRACHOMA SURVEILLANCE AND REPORTING UNIT TRACHOMA SURVEILLANCE REPORT 2008 AUGUST 2009 Prepared by Ms Betty Tellis Ms Kathy Fotis Mr Ross Dunn Professor Jill Keeffe Professor Hugh Taylor Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne National Trachoma Surveillance and Reporting Unit Trachoma Surveillance Report 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The National Trachoma Surveillance and Reporting Unit’s third Surveillance Report 2008 was compiled using data collected and/or reported by the following organisations and departments. STATE AND TERRITORY CONTRIBUTIONS NORTHERN TERRITORY • Australian Government Emergency Intervention (AGEI) • Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHS) • Centre for Disease Control, Northern Territory Department of Health and Families, Northern Territory • Healthy School Age Kids (HSAK) program: Top End • HSAK: Central Australia SOUTH AUSTRALIA • Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia, Eye Health and Chronic Disease Specialist Support Program (EH&CDSSP) • Country Health South Australia • Ceduna/Koonibba Health Service • Nganampa Health Council • Oak Valley (Maralinga Tjarutja) Health Service • Pika Wiya Health Service • Tullawon Health Service • Umoona Tjutagku Health Service WESTERN AUSTRALIA • Communicable Diseases Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia • Population Health Units and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services staff in the Goldfields, Kimberley, Midwest and Pilbara regions OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE • Institute of Medical Veterinary
    [Show full text]
  • A Collaborative History of Social Innovation in South Australia
    Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies University of South Australia St Bernards Road Magill South Australia 5072 Australia www.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute © Rob Manwaring and University of South Australia 2008 A COLLABORATIVE HISTORY OF SOCIAL INNOVATION IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA Rob Manwaring∗ Abstract In this paper I outline a collaborative history of social innovation in South Australia, a state that has a striking record of social innovation. What makes this history so intriguing is that on the face of it, South Australia would seem an unlikely location for such experimentation. This paper outlines the main periods of innovation. Appended to it is the first attempt to collate all these social innovations in one document. This paper is unique in that its account of the history of social innovation has been derived after public consultation in South Australia, and is a key output from Geoff Mulgan’s role as an Adelaide Thinker in Residence.1 The paper analyses why, at times, South Australia appears to have punched above its weight as a leader in social innovation. Drawing on Giddens’ ‘structuration’ model, the paper uses South Australian history as a case study to determine how far structure and/or agency can explain the main periods of social innovation. Introduction South Australia has a great and rich (albeit uneven) history of social innovation, and has at times punched above its weight. What makes this history so intriguing is that on the face of it, South Australia is quite an unlikely place for such innovation. South Australia is a relatively new entity; it has a relatively small but highly urbanised population, and is geographically isolated from other Australian urban centres and other developed nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Coober Pedy, South Australia
    The etymology of Coober Pedy, South Australia Petter Naessan The aim of this paper is to outline and assess the diverging etymologies of ‘Coober Pedy’ in northern South Australia, in the search for original and post-contact local Indigenous significance associated with the name and the region. At the interface of contemporary Yankunytjatjara and Pitjantjatjara opinion (mainly in the Coober Pedy region, where I have conducted fieldwork since 1999) and other sources, an interesting picture emerges: in the current use by Yankunytjatjara and Pitjantjatjara people as well as non-Indigenous people in Coober Pedy, the name ‘Coober Pedy’ – as ‘white man’s hole (in the ground)’ – does not seem to reflect or point toward a pre-contact Indigenous presence. Coober Pedy is an opal mining and tourist town with a total population of about 3500, situated near the Stuart Highway, about 850 kilometres north of Adelaide, South Australia. Coober Pedy is close to the Stuart Range, lies within the Arckaringa Basin and is near the border of the Great Victoria Desert. Low spinifex grasslands amounts for most of the sparse vegetation. The Coober Pedy and Oodnadatta region is characterised by dwarf shrubland and tussock grassland. Further north and northwest, low open shrub savanna and open shrub woodland dominates.1 Coober Pedy and surrounding regions are arid and exhibit very unpredictable rainfall. Much of the economic activity in the region (as well as the initial settlement of Euro-Australian invaders) is directly related to the geology, namely quite large deposits of opal. The area was only settled by non-Indigenous people after 1915 when opal was uncovered but traditionally the Indigenous population was western Arabana (Midlaliri).
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Agency, Institutionalisation and Survival
    2q' t '9à ABORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND PEGGY BROCK B. A. (Hons) Universit¡r of Adelaide Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History/Geography, University of Adelaide March f99f ll TAT}LE OF CONTENTS ii LIST OF TAE}LES AND MAPS iii SUMMARY iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . vii ABBREVIATIONS ix C}IAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION I CFIAPTER TWO. TI{E HISTORICAL CONTEXT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA 32 CHAPTER THREE. POONINDIE: HOME AWAY FROM COUNTRY 46 POONINDIE: AN trSTä,TILISHED COMMUNITY AND ITS DESTRUCTION 83 KOONIBBA: REFUGE FOR TI{E PEOPLE OF THE VI/EST COAST r22 CFIAPTER SIX. KOONIBBA: INSTITUTIONAL UPHtrAVAL AND ADJUSTMENT t70 C}IAPTER SEVEN. DISPERSAL OF KOONIBBA PEOPLE AND THE END OF TI{E MISSION ERA T98 CTIAPTER EIGHT. SURVTVAL WITHOUT INSTITUTIONALISATION236 C}IAPTER NINtr. NEPABUNNA: THtr MISSION FACTOR 268 CFIAPTER TEN. AE}ORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND SURVTVAL 299 BIBLIOGRAPI{Y 320 ltt TABLES AND MAPS Table I L7 Table 2 128 Poonindie location map opposite 54 Poonindie land tenure map f 876 opposite 114 Poonindie land tenure map f 896 opposite r14 Koonibba location map opposite L27 Location of Adnyamathanha campsites in relation to pastoral station homesteads opposite 252 Map of North Flinders Ranges I93O opposite 269 lv SUMMARY The institutionalisation of Aborigines on missions and government stations has dominated Aboriginal-non-Aboriginal relations. Institutionalisation of Aborigines, under the guise of assimilation and protection policies, was only abandoned in.the lg7Os. It is therefore important to understand the implications of these policies for Aborigines and Australian society in general. I investigate the affect of institutionalisation on Aborigines, questioning the assumption tl.at they were passive victims forced onto missions and government stations and kept there as virtual prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Mattingley Christobel Maralinga's Long Shadow Final Draft Teachers
    BOOK PUBLISHERS Teachers’ Notes by Rob Andrew Maralinga’s Long Shadow: Yvonne’s Story by Christobel Mattingley ISBN 9781760290177 Recommended for ages 12-18 yrs These notes may be reproduced free of charge for use and study within schools but they may not be reproduced (either in whole or in part) and offered for commercial sale. Developed with the assistance of Nuclear Futures lphville community arts, film, theatre, environment nuclearfutures.org Introduction ........................................... 2 Links to the curriculum ............................ 3 Using these notes in the classroom ..... 5 Classroom activities ................................ 5 End-of-unit activities ....................... 11 Author motivation ................................. 12 About the writers .................................. 15 83 Alexander Street PO Box 8500 Crows Nest, Sydney St Leonards NSW 2065 NSW 1590 ph: (61 2) 8425 0100 [email protected] Allen & Unwin PTY LTD Australia Australia fax: (61 2) 9906 2218 www.allenandunwin.com ABN 79 003 994 278 INTRODUCTION Maralinga’s Long Shadow is a powerful telling of the experiences of Yvonne Edwards, an Anangu woman who was forcibly removed from her homelands as a child, due to the British nuclear tests at Maralinga in South Australia. The book gives an intimate view of the effects of the tests on one particular family and their community through the life of Yvonne Edwards—as a child, young woman, mother, grandmother and community activist. Maralinga’s Long Shadow highlights the long term effects of the forced relocation of Aboriginal people from their traditional homelands and contains within it the story of yet another member of the Stolen Generation—Yvonne Edwards’ first child, who was removed after Yvonne was deceived into signing a paper to give him up.
    [Show full text]
  • REGISTER Kaurna Welcome to Country
    WELCOME REGISTER Kaurna Welcome to Country The following is a key contact list of Kaurna people and groups that have been approved by the Kaurna Nation Cultural Heritage Committee. It is suggested that you please negotiate fees before booking the performer. This information is correct at the time of posting NAME CONTENT CONTACT INFORMATION Georgina Williams Senior Female Ms Georgina Williams Greeting to Country Mobile: 0448 536 912 Email: [email protected] Aunty Georgina Williams, Ngankiburka-Mekauwe is a Kaurna Senior Woman. She grew up on Point Pearce Mission, Yorke Peninsula. She has spoken at numerous forums on Aboriginal issues and is a long term campaigner on Aboriginal rights, also working to renew the knowledge of her ancestors in a contemporary urban world and to bridge the divide between black and white worlds. Creatively, Georgina has been involved in theatre, music, poetry and the visual arts. Lewis O’Brien Kaurna Elder Dr Lewis O’Brien AO Welcome to Country Mobile: 0424 001 095 Uncle Lewis Yerloburka O’Brien is a Kaurna Elder born at Point Pearce. Named Aboriginal Elder of the Year in 1977, awarded ‘Local Hero’ Australia Day Awards in 2003, Fellow of the University of SA in 2004, Citizen of Humanity Awarded by the National Committee of Human Rights in 2009 and an Order of Australia Medal in 2014. Uncle Lewis is widely regarded as a leader of reconciliation and custodian of Kaurna culture. Frank Wanganeen Kaurna Elder Mr Frank Wanganeen Welcome to Country Email: [email protected] Cultural Tour Guide and Educator Uncle Frank Wanganeen is a Kaurna Elder born at Wallaroo on Narungga country.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling the Ooldea/Yalata Aborigines, 1952-1982
    The politics of space and mobility! controlling the Ooldea/Yalata Aborigines, 1952-1982 Maggie Brady Abstract In 1977 Isobel (Sally) White described the camp sites, spatial organisation and mobility of Pit- jantjatjara-speaking people at Yalata, a community 1000 kilometres northwest of Adelaide, South Australia. She remarked on the unusual living arrangements ofthat community, in which the entire Aboriginal population was periodically relocated from one Big Camp to another some­ where on the Yalata reserve, 4650 square kilometres of land running east-west along the Eyre Highiuay. In this article, I show that the unusual arrangement she described did not arise spon­ taneously, but was one of several last-ditch strategies designed to force Yalata people to remain well south of the dangerous and prohibited area of the Maralinga atomic testing site. White observed and described this state of affairs without knowing its origins. She and the people with luhom she lived up until the early 1970s could also not have imagined that resettlement in the spinifex country of the Great Victoria Desert zvould eventually take place, and that there would be a reclamation of the ivide-ranging mobility the people once had. In 1949 one hundred and thirty Aboriginal men, women and children from the United Aborigines' Mission (UAM) station at Ooldea Soak became actors in the feature film 'Bitter Springs'. Accompanied by their missionary carers, they travelled east by train from Ooldea, on the edge of the Great Victoria Desert in South Australia, to the film site at Warren's Gorge, near Quorn. There, for the director Ralph Smart of Ealing Studios, they acted out a fictional dispossession of their land, a dispossession which was already taking place in real life.
    [Show full text]
  • Tough(Er) Love Art from Eyre Peninsula
    tough(er) love art from Eyre Peninsula COUNTRY ARTS SA LEARNING CONNECTIONS RESOURCE KIT AbOUT THIS RESOURCE KIT This Resource kit is published to accompany the exhibition tough(er) love: art from Eyre Peninsula at the Flinders University City Gallery, February 23 – April 28 2013 and touring regionally with Country Arts SA 2013 – 2015. This Resource kit is designed to support learning outcomes and teaching programs associated with viewing the tough(er) love exhibition by: • Providing information about the artists • Providing information about key works • Exploring Indigenous perspectives within contemporary art • Challenging students to engage with the works and the exhibition’s themes • Identifying ways in which the exhibition can be used as a curriculum resource • Providing strategies for exhibition viewing, as well as pre and post-visit research • It may be used in conjunction with a visit to the exhibition or as a pre-visit or post-visit resource. ACKNOWLEdgEMENTS Resource kit written by John Neylon, art writer, curator and arts education consultant. The writer acknowledges the particular contribution of all the artists and the following people to the development of this resource: COUNTRY ARTS SA Craig Harrison, Manager Artform Development Jayne Holland, Development Officer Western Eyre Penny Camens, Coordinator Arts Programs Anna Goodhind, Coordinator Visual Arts Pip Gare, Web and Communications Officer Tammy Hall, Coordinator Audience Development Beth Wuttke, Graphic Designer FLINDERS UNIVERSITY Fiona Salmon, Director Flinders University Art Museum & City Gallery Celia Dottore, Exhibitions Manager TOUGH(ER) LOVE RESOURCE KIT 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS BACKGROUND . 4 About this exhibition ............................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND The Artists ......................................................................................... 4 BEHIND THE SCENES The Curator .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hdl 67064.Pdf
    1 2 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CHRISTIES BEACH ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: PRECEDENTS AND „BEST PRACTICE‟ DESIGN ................................................... 10 The Design of Early Learning, Child- care and Children and Family Centres for Aboriginal People ........................................................................................................ 10 Conceptions of Quality ............................................................................................... 10 Precedents: Pre-Schools, Kindergartens, Child and Family Centres ......................... 12 Kulai Aboriginal Preschool ............................................................................ 12 The Djidi Djidi Aboriginal School ................................................................... 13 Waimea Kohanga Reo Victory School .......................................................... 15 Mnjikaning First Nation Early Childhood Education Centre........................... 16 Native Child and Family Services of Toronto ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming the Kaurna Language: a Long and Lasting Collaboration in an Urban Setting
    Vol. 8 (2014), pp. 409-429 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4613 Series: The Role of Linguists in Indigenous Community Language Programs in Australia1 Reclaiming the Kaurna language: a long and lasting collaboration in an urban setting Rob Amery University of Adelaide A long-running collaboration between Kaurna people and linguists in South Australia be- gan in 1989 with a songbook. Following annual community workshops and the estab- lishment of teaching programs, the author embarked on a PhD to research historical sources and an emerging modern language based on these sources. In response to numer- ous requests for names, translations and information, together with Kaurna Elders Lewis O’Brien and Alitya Rigney, the author and others formed Kaurna Warra Pintyandi (KWP) in 2002. It is a monthly forum where researchers, and others interested in Kaurna lan- guage, can meet with Kaurna people to discuss their concerns. KWP, based at the Univer- sity of Adelaide, is not incorporated and attendance of meetings is voluntary. The com- mittee has gained a measure of credibility and respect from the Kaurna community, gov- ernment departments and the public and has recently signed a Memorandum of Under- standing with the University of Adelaide. However, KWP and the author sit, uneasily at times, at the intersection between the University and the community. This paper explores the nature of collaboration between Kaurna people and researchers through KWP in the context of reliance on historical documentation, much of which is open to interpretation. Linguistics provides some of the skills needed for interpretation of source materials.
    [Show full text]
  • A Response to the National Water Initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Scotdesco and Davenport Aboriginal Settlements
    36 A response to the National Water initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Scotdesco and Davenport Aboriginal settlements Scotdesco and Davenport Yarilena, initiative from Nepabunna, response to the National Water A A response to the National Water Meryl Pearce Report initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Eileen Willis Carmel McCarthy 36 Scotdesco and Davenport Fiona Ryan Aboriginal settlements Ben Wadham 2008 Meryl Pearce A response to the National Water Initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Scotdesco and Davenport Aboriginal settlements Meryl Pearce Eileen Willis Carmel McCarthy Fiona Ryan Ben Wadham 2008 Contributing author information Dr Meryl Pearce is a Senior lecturer in the School of Geography, Population and Environmental Management at Flinders University. Her research focuses on water resource sustainability. Associate Professor Eileen Willis is a sociologist with research interests in Aboriginal health with a social determinants focus. Carmel McCarthy has broad ranging expertise in social, medical, and educational research. Fiona Ryan has participated in research projects related to Aboriginal issues and Aboriginal languages. She has a Masters in Applied Linguistics from Adelaide University and has worked extensively in the area of adult education. Dr Ben Wadham is a senior lecturer in the School of Education, Flinders University. His research has focused on Aboriginal reconciliation and Australian race relations from a governance and policy perspective. Desert Knowledge CRC Report Number 36 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source. ISBN: 1 74158 085 4 (Print copy) ISBN: 1 74158 086 2 (Online copy) ISSN: 1832 6684 Citation Pearce M, Willis E, McCarthy C, Ryan F and Wadham B.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Review of the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights Act 1981, I Am Pleased to Present the Following Final Report and Recommendations
    Limited review of the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights Act 1981 Final Report The Hon Ian Hunter MLC Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation Parliament House ADELAIDE SA 5000 Dear Minister On behalf of the Review Panel appointed to assist in a limited review of the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights Act 1981, I am pleased to present the following Final Report and recommendations. This Final Report follows the Interim Report of 21 November 2013. It takes into account further consultations as recommended in the Interim Report and the discussions and outcome of the Special General Meeting convened by the Executive Board of Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara to discuss and decide on the recommendations made by the Panel in the Interim Report. As with the Interim Report, this Final Report has been prepared in accordance with the Terms of Reference provided and following consultation and discussion across the APY Lands as described. The recommendations in this Final Report are largely the same as those set out in the Interim Report, with small but important modifications to four of the recommendations to better accord with what Anangu have told the Panel subsequent to the Interim Report. The Panel underscores that the recommendations in this Final Report have not been either confirmed or rejected by all Anangu for reasons which are indicated in this Report. Further processes are recommended to enable Anangu to reach a consensus about the recommendations. Yours sincerely Hon. Dr. Robyn Layton AO QC Panel Chair April 2014 P a g e | 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]