DOCSLIB.ORG

National Trachoma Surveillance and Reporting Unit Trachoma Surveillance Report 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Trachoma Surveillance and Reporting Unit Trachoma Surveillance Report 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS NATIONAL TRACHOMA SURVEILLANCE AND REPORTING UNIT TRACHOMA SURVEILLANCE REPORT 2008 AUGUST 2009 Prepared by Ms Betty Tellis Ms Kathy Fotis Mr Ross Dunn Professor Jill Keeffe Professor Hugh Taylor Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne National Trachoma Surveillance and Reporting Unit Trachoma Surveillance Report 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The National Trachoma Surveillance and Reporting Unit’s third Surveillance Report 2008 was compiled using data collected and/or reported by the following organisations and departments. STATE AND TERRITORY CONTRIBUTIONS NORTHERN TERRITORY • Australian Government Emergency Intervention (AGEI) • Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHS) • Centre for Disease Control, Northern Territory Department of Health and Families, Northern Territory • Healthy School Age Kids (HSAK) program: Top End • HSAK: Central Australia SOUTH AUSTRALIA • Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia, Eye Health and Chronic Disease Specialist Support Program (EH&CDSSP) • Country Health South Australia • Ceduna/Koonibba Health Service • Nganampa Health Council • Oak Valley (Maralinga Tjarutja) Health Service • Pika Wiya Health Service • Tullawon Health Service • Umoona Tjutagku Health Service WESTERN AUSTRALIA • Communicable Diseases Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia • Population Health Units and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services staff in the Goldfields, Kimberley, Midwest and Pilbara regions OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE • Institute of Medical Veterinary Science (IMVS) • Northern Territory Government Pathology Service (NTGPS) • Western Diagnostics Pathology Service (WDPS) The National Indigenous Eye Health Survey (NIEHS) data were collected by the Centre for Eye Research Australia. The National Trachoma Surveillance Reference Group ( Table F.1, page 157) provided input into the development of the report. i National Trachoma Surveillance and Reporting Unit Trachoma Surveillance Report 2008 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................................... I CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................................. IV LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. XII DEFINITIONS.....................................................................................................................................XIV ABBREVIATIONS ..............................................................................................................................XVI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................XVIII INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS............................................................................................................................................. 3 1. DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................................................. 3 Antibiotic resistance ................................................................................................................ 4 2. SCREENING.............................................................................................................................. 5 Northern Territory.................................................................................................................... 5 South Australia........................................................................................................................ 5 Western Australia.................................................................................................................... 6 3. DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORTING........................................................................................ 6 RESULTS.............................................................................................................................................. 9 1. NATIONAL OVERVIEW............................................................................................................. 9 2. NORTHERN TERRITORY ....................................................................................................... 15 Screening for active trachoma ............................................................................................... 18 Treatment.............................................................................................................................. 23 Comparison of 2006, 2007 and 2008 active trachoma data................................................... 24 Trichiasis............................................................................................................................... 25 Trachoma control activities.................................................................................................... 26 3. SOUTH AUSTRALIA............................................................................................................... 27 Screening for active trachoma ............................................................................................... 30 Comparison of 2006, 2007 and 2008 active trachoma data................................................... 36 Trichiasis............................................................................................................................... 37 Trachoma control activities.................................................................................................... 38 ii National Trachoma Surveillance and Reporting Unit Trachoma Surveillance Report 2008 4. WESTERN AUSTRALIA.......................................................................................................... 39 Screening for active trachoma ............................................................................................... 42 Treatment.............................................................................................................................. 45 Comparison of 2006, 2007 and 2008 active trachoma data................................................... 46 Trichiasis............................................................................................................................... 47 Trachoma control activities.................................................................................................... 48 5. ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE..................................................................................................... 49 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................... 53 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 57 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................................... 59 A. NORTHERN TERRITORY COMMUNITY LEVEL DATA BY REGION..................................... 61 I. ALICE SPRINGS REMOTE............................................................................................. 61 II. BARKLY .......................................................................................................................... 70 III. DARWIN RURAL............................................................................................................. 76 IV. EAST ARNHEM............................................................................................................... 83 V. KATHERINE.................................................................................................................... 88 B. SOUTH AUSTRALIA COMMUNITY LEVEL DATA BY REGION ............................................ 95 I. CEDUNA/KOONIBBA...................................................................................................... 98 II. NGANAMPA.................................................................................................................. 101 III. OAK VALLEY (MARALINGA TJARUTJA)...................................................................... 104 IV. PIKA WIYA.................................................................................................................... 106 V. TULLAWON .................................................................................................................. 109 VI. UMOONA TJUTAGKU................................................................................................... 111 C. WESTERN AUSTRALIA COMMUNITY LEVEL DATA BY REGION ..................................... 115 I. GOLDFIELDS................................................................................................................ 115 II. KIMBERLEY.................................................................................................................. 123 III. MIDWEST ..................................................................................................................... 132 IV. PILBARA ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indigenous Design Issuesceduna Aboriginal Children and Family
    INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 1 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 2 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWELDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: PRECEDENTS AND “BEST PRACTICE„ DESIGN ....................................................10 The Design of Early Learning, Child-care and Children and Family Centres for Aboriginal People ..................................................................................................................................10 Conceptions of Quality ........................................................................................................ 10 Precedents: Pre-Schools, Kindergartens, Child and Family Centres ..................................12 Kulai Aboriginal Preschool .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Collaborative History of Social Innovation in South Australia
    Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies University of South Australia St Bernards Road Magill South Australia 5072 Australia www.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute © Rob Manwaring and University of South Australia 2008 A COLLABORATIVE HISTORY OF SOCIAL INNOVATION IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA Rob Manwaring∗ Abstract In this paper I outline a collaborative history of social innovation in South Australia, a state that has a striking record of social innovation. What makes this history so intriguing is that on the face of it, South Australia would seem an unlikely location for such experimentation. This paper outlines the main periods of innovation. Appended to it is the first attempt to collate all these social innovations in one document. This paper is unique in that its account of the history of social innovation has been derived after public consultation in South Australia, and is a key output from Geoff Mulgan’s role as an Adelaide Thinker in Residence.1 The paper analyses why, at times, South Australia appears to have punched above its weight as a leader in social innovation. Drawing on Giddens’ ‘structuration’ model, the paper uses South Australian history as a case study to determine how far structure and/or agency can explain the main periods of social innovation. Introduction South Australia has a great and rich (albeit uneven) history of social innovation, and has at times punched above its weight. What makes this history so intriguing is that on the face of it, South Australia is quite an unlikely place for such innovation. South Australia is a relatively new entity; it has a relatively small but highly urbanised population, and is geographically isolated from other Australian urban centres and other developed nations.
    [Show full text]
  • South Australia by Local Government Area (LGA) Alphabetically
    Dementia prevalence estimates 2021-2058 South Australia by local government area (LGA) alphabetically LGA 2021 2058 Adelaide City Council 366 923 Adelaide Hills Council 801 1,363 Adelaide Plains Council 144 373 Alexandrina Council 937 1,406 Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara 15 79 The Barossa Council 596 972 Barunga West 102 77 Berri Barmera Council 292 351 Burnside 1,206 2,055 Campbelltown City Council 1,372 2,383 Ceduna 70 117 Charles Sturt 2,794 5,740 Clare and Gilbert Valleys Council 250 293 Cleve 42 56 Coober Pedy 49 61 Coorong District Council 140 120 Copper Coast Council 489 528 Elliston 22 35 The Flinders Ranges Council 46 49 Franklin Harbour 36 41 Gawler 611 1,227 Goyder 116 132 Grant 156 275 Holdfast Bay 1,091 1,911 Kangaroo Island Council 129 192 Dementia Australia (2018) dementia prevalence data 2018-2058, commissioned research undertaken by NATSEM, University of Canberra. © Dementia Australia 2021 South Australia by local government area (LGA) alphabetically (continued) LGA 2021 2058 Karoonda East Murray 38 34 Kimba 25 34 Kingston District Council 83 69 Light Regional Council 221 353 Lower Eyre Peninsula 109 219 Loxton Waikerie 324 390 Marion 2,043 3,944 Mid Murray Council 263 393 Mitcham 1,589 2,684 Mount Barker District Council 657 1,650 Mount Gambier 627 909 Mount Remarkable 91 86 Murray Bridge 531 911 Naracoorte Lucindale Council 198 295 Northern Areas Council 131 141 Norwood Payneham & St Peters 926 1,754 Onkaparinga 3,578 7,017 Orroroo Carrieton 30 25 Peterborough 59 44 Playford 1,406 3,487 Port Adelaide Enfield 2,506 6,133 Port Augusta City Council 294 484 Port Lincoln 348 451 Port Pirie Regional Council 474 582 Prospect 369 851 These data exclude Gerard Community Council, Maralinga Tjarutja Community Inc, Nepabunna Community Council, Outback Communities Authority and Yalata Community because of very small numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Personal Journey with Anangu History and Politics
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Flinders Academic Commons FJHP – Volume 27 ‐2011 A Personal Journey with Anangu History and Politics Bill Edwards Introduction Fifty years ago, in September 1961, I sat in the shade of a mulga tree near the Officer Creek, a usually dry watercourse which rises in the Musgrave Ranges in the far north- west of South Australia and peters out in the sandhill country to the south. I was observing work being done to supply infrastructure for a new settlement for Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara Aboriginal people. That settlement, which opened in the following month of October, is Fregon, an Aboriginal community which together with other Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara communities featured in newspaper and radio news reports in September 2011. These reports referred to overcrowding in houses, the lack of adequate furnishings, poverty and, in the case of Fregon, children starving. Later comments by people on the ground suggested that the reports of starvation were exaggerated.1 When I returned to my home at Ernabella Mission, 60 kilometres north-east of Fregon, in 1961, I recorded my observations and forwarded them to The Advertiser in Adelaide. They were published as a feature article on Saturday 23 September, 1961 under the heading ‘Cattle Station for “Old Australians”’.2 As I read and listened to the recent reports I was concerned at the limited understanding of the history and the effects of policy changes in the region. As a letter I wrote to The Advertiser, referring back to my earlier article, was not published, I expanded it into an article and sent it to Nicolas Rothwell, the Northern Territory correspondent for The Australian, seeking his advice as to where I might submit it.
    [Show full text]
  • LGA Membership Proposition
    LGA Membership Proposition October 2018 Local Government Association of South Australia Membership Proposition Adopted by the LGA Board on 13 September 2018 and Members at the AGM held 26 October 2018 1. Membership Proposition 1.1. The Local Government Association of South Australia (LGA) is constituted as a public authority under the Local Government Act 1999 for the purpose of promoting and advancing the interests of local government. 1.2. The object of the LGA is to achieve public value through the promotion and advancement of the interests of local government by: 1.2.1. advocating to achieve greater influence for local government in matters affecting councils and communities; 1.2.2. assisting Members to build capacity and increase sustainability through integrated and coordinated local government; and 1.2.3. advancing local government through best practice and continuous improvement. 1.3. The LGA is a member-based organisation which fulfils its object through the active participation of its Members. 1.4. As contemplated by the Local Government Association of South Australia Constitution and Rules (adopted April 13, 2018) (Constitution) the Members have endorsed this document (Membership Proposition) providing for the relationship between the LGA and its Members. 1.5. The Membership Proposition may be altered only: 1.5.1 By resolution passed at a General Meeting of which at least 30 days’ notice has been given to Members; and 1.5.2 with approval of the Minister. 1.6. A capitalised term not defined in this document has the meaning provided for the term in the Constitution. 1.7. To the extent of any inconsistency between the Constitution and this Membership Proposition, the Constitution will prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Perspectives
    NOVELS Baillie, Allan The First Voyage F BAI:A An adventure story set in our very distant past, 30,000 years ago, when the first tribes from Timor braved the ocean on primitive rafts to travel into the unknown, and reached the land mass of what is now Australia. Baillie, Allan Songman F BAI:A This story is set in northern Australia in 1720, before the time of Captain Cook. Yukuwa sets out across the sea to the islands of Indonesia. It is an adventure contrasting lifestyles and cultures, based on an episode of our history rarely explored in fiction. Birch, Tony, The White Girl F BIR:T Odette Brown has lived her whole life on the fringes of a small country town. After her daughter disappeared and left her with her granddaughter Sissy to raise on her own, Odette has managed to stay under the radar of the welfare authorities who are removing fair-skinned Aboriginal children from their families. When a new policeman arrives in town, determined to enforce the law, Odette must risk everything to save Sissy and protect everything she loves. Boyd, Jillian Bakir and Bi F BOY:J Bakir and Bi is based on a Torres Strait Islander creation story with illustrations by 18-year-old Tori-Jay Mordey. Bakir and Mar live on a remote island called Egur with their two young children. While fishing on the beach Bakir comes across a very special pelican named Bi. A famine occurs, and life on the island is no longer harmonious. Bunney, Ron The Hidden F BUN:R Thrown out of home by his penny-pinching stepmother, Matt flees Freemantle aboard a boat, only to be bullied and brutalised by the boson.
    [Show full text]
  • A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia
    “KEEP THAT LANGUAGE GOING!” A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia A consultancy carried out by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, South Australia by Patrick McConvell, Rob Amery, Mary-Anne Gale, Christine Nicholls, Jonathan Nicholls, Lester Irabinna Rigney and Simone Ulalka Tur May 2002 Declaration The authors of this report wish to acknowledge that South Australia’s Indigenous communities remain the custodians for all of the Indigenous languages spoken across the length and breadth of this state. Despite enormous pressures and institutionalised opposition, Indigenous communities have refused to abandon their culture and languages. As a result, South Australia is not a storehouse for linguistic relics but remains the home of vital, living languages. The wisdom of South Australia’s Indigenous communities has been and continues to be foundational for all language programs and projects. In carrying out this project, the Research Team has been strengthened and encouraged by the commitment, insight and linguistic pride of South Australia’s Indigenous communities. All of the recommendations contained in this report are premised on the fundamental right of Indigenous Australians to speak, protect, strengthen and reclaim their traditional languages and to pass them on to future generations. * Within this report, the voices of Indigenous respondents appear in italics. In some places, these voices stand apart from the main body of the report, in other places, they are embedded within sentences. The decision to incorporate direct quotations or close paraphrases of Indigenous respondent’s view is recognition of the importance of foregrounding the perspectives and aspirations of Indigenous communities across the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Far North SA Government Region
    !Amata Kalka! Kanpi Nyapari Pipalytjara ! ! ! !Ernabella !Yunyarinyi !Umuwa !Fregon Indulkana! !Mimili !Watarru Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands Mintabie ! ! Marla ! Oodnadatta Cadney Innamincka! !Park Moomba! William !Creek !Coober Pedy Oak !Valley Maralinga Tjarutja Lands ! Marree ! Lyndhurst Arkaroola ! Olympic Dam Village ! ! Andamooka Roxby Downs ! Copley ! Nepabunna Leigh Creek! ! Maralinga Tarcool!a Tjarutja Lands ! ! Beltana Kingoonya !Glendambo Parachilna! ! ! Blinman Woomera Yalata! Yalata Wilpena Aboriginal Reserve ! ! Far North Hawker South Australian CEDUNA ! Cradock CEDUNA !Cockburn FLINDERS Mingary ! Government Regions RANGES ! ! Quorn Olary Eyre and Western Local Government boundary ! Far North Aboriginal lands PORT ! Manna Hill ± Stirling North Murray and Mallee AUGUSTA MOUNT 1:1,500,000 Major road Yunta! 0 20 40 60 80 100 km ! Yorke and Mid North REMARKABLE Other main road ! Iron Knob Orroroo ! PORT ! Minor road Streaky Booleroo Produced by Department of Planning and Local Government AUGUSTA GPO Box 1815 Adelaide SA 5001 Bay STREAKY Cen!tre www.dplg.sa.gov.au Iron Baron Data Source Local governments and roads supplied by BAY Wudinna ! WHYALLA PET!ERBOROUGH Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure. ! ! ! Peterborough Aboriginal lands supplied by Primary Resources and WHYALLA Port Wirrabara Industry SA. WUDINNA Kimba Germein ! Napperby Projection Lambert Conformal Conic KIMBA ! Compiled November 2010 Laura ! Jamestown PORT PIRIE ! Gladstone © Government of South Australia 2010 ! No part of this document
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Rehabilitation of the Maralinga and Emu Sites
    AU9816838 Status of Rehabilitation of the Maralinga and Emu Sites Rob Rawson, Assistant Secretary, Minerals Access and Rehabilitation Branch, Department of Primary Industries and Energy, GPO Box 858, Canberra, ACT, 2601 Pat Davoren, Parliamentary, Projects and Planning Division, Department of Primary Industries and Energy, GPO Box 858, Canberra, ACT, 2601 Caroline Perkins, Director, Rehabilitation and Radioactive Waste Management Section, Minerals Access and Rehabilitation Branch, Department of Primary Industries and Energy, GPO Box 858, Canberra, ACT, 2601 SUMMARY The $100 million rehabilitation of the former British nuclear test sites at Maralinga and Emu, South Australia, is progressing with implementation of an option identified by a Technical Assessment Group. The Maralinga Rehabilitation Project was agreed by the Commonwealth and South Australian Governments, and by the Maralinga Tjarutja traditional owners. The Project, which was assisted by an ex gratia payment of £20 million by the British Government, is the largest clean-up of a former nuclear test site, and the first to be undertaken on a commercial basis. The work program is proceeding on time and within budget and is due to be completed in 1998/99. At Maralinga, plutonium-contaminated soil is being removed and buried in trenches at the Taranaki, TM and Wewak sites, with the work due to be completed at the end of 1997. After monitoring and clearance by the Australian Radiation Laboratory, clean soil will be distributed over rehabilitated lots and trenches, and the areas revegetated. At Taranaki, 21 radioac- tively contaminated burial pits will be stabilised using in-situ vitrification (ISV), a process which melts contaminated soil by means of large electric currents applied through graphitic electrodes, producing a strong, leach resistant, glass ceramic block.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of Empty Country and the Story of 'Deadly' Glass
    U N A R A Y The Myth of Empty Country And the Story of ‘Deadly’ Glass l d ı v a n_9 In order for Country to be living, people need to be there.1 Yhonnie Scarce, 2020 AS FAR AS THE EYE WILL SEE When British scientists were surveying international locations for their atomic tests in the early 1950s, they were looking for empty land, country devoid of human life. Culturally habituated to see what they wanted to see, they found what they wanted to find: ‘empty’ land and sea off the north- west coast and inland deserts of Australia which proved ideal for their clandestine military purposes. This ‘find’ echoed James Cook’s ‘discovery’ when he claimed the ‘empty land’ of the Australian continent for the British Crown under Europe’s international legal doctrine of terra nullius in 1770. In the mid-twentieth century, in the wake of their Second World War defeat in Singapore and the military power demonstrated at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United Kingdom’s aspiration was to keep the fire of Empire burning: keeping pace with the United States and Russia in their escalating arms race was a matter of urgency and Commonwealth honour. Today, such misappropriations and misdirected ambitions are often massed together under the malevolent banner of colonialism. This unresolved and violent history between Australia’s first people and British colonisers remains a cloud in its collective skies and a scar on its soil; a past complicated by the matrilineal rift between Britain and its bastard colony offspring with its own history of secrets, denials and dismissals.
    [Show full text]
  • Source: Connecting to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Culture
    CONNECTING TO ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CULTURE: A resource to help Carers connect children and young people in their care to their Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture 1 2 CONTENTS Page 4 What can I do to support an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander child or young person? Page 5 South Australian Aboriginal Communities Page 6 South Australian Languages Page 7 Department for Child Protection responsibilities and tools Page 9 Foster Care Agency supports Page 10 Cultural Immersion and Aboriginal Community Councils Page 13 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Service Providers and Programs Page 16 Additional Resources Page 17 Significant dates and events Page 20 Acknowledgements 3 Speak with your child’s case worker or foster care agency to find out any cultural background, history or Explore ways to use heritage. Engage in their services, language through programs, tools or seek referrals if conversation, everyday Learn through play, necessary. tasks and activities books, games, craft (pg. 7-8, 9) and activities that they (pg. 13-15, 16, 17-18) enjoy (pg. 13-15, 16, 17-18) What can I do to support an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Immerse Carer and child in culture wherever possible Listen to ATSI radio, child connect to their culture? YouTube, videos or (pg. 10-12, 13-15, 16, 17-18) songs and download apps (pg. 16) Be culturally inclusive in your home – by including an ATSI perspective and Approach your local having ATSI paintings and artwork, council, ask an elder songs and music, food, dolls/toys, or community group. fabric, books, or photos, pictures and posters.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Managing Parks in South Australia 2 Contents
    Strong People, Strong Country Co-managing parks in South Australia 2 Contents A journey of…Listening . 2 Traditional belonging . 3 Protecting nature . 3 A journey of…Understanding . 4 What is ‘co-management’? . 5 Working together . 5 A journey of…Respect . 6 Legal framework . 7 Achievements . 8 Our stories: Co-management in South Australia . 10 Arabana Parks Advisory Committee . 12 Gawler Ranges National Park Advisory Committee . 14 Ikara–Flinders Ranges National Park Co-management Board . 16 Kanku–Breakaways Conservation Park Co-management Board . .18 Lake Gairdner National Park Co-management Board . 20 Mamungari Conservation Park Co-management Board . 22 Ngaut Ngaut Conservation Park Co-management Board . 24 Nullarbor Parks Advisory Committee . 26 Vulkathunha–Gammon Ranges National Park Co-management Board . .28 Witjira National Park Co-management Board . 30 Yandruwandha Yawarrawarrka Parks Advisory Committee . 32 Yumbarra Conservation Park Co-management Board . 34 Acknowledgements . 36 Bibliography . 36 Strong People, Strong Country 1 A journey of... listening We meet around the table with different stories and histories; co-management helps us develop shared contemporary visions for the future of the country. Matt Ward, DEW Regional Manager, Natural Resources Alinytjara Wilurara 2 Traditional belonging Protecting nature ”By reconnecting people to their land in a way “Co-management is a new way of working that benefits them, culture becomes strong again” together; a new way to care for our parks” Leonard Miller Snr, Yumbarra John Schutz, Director of National Parks and Wildlife Aboriginal Australians have an intrinsic connection to their South Australia’s protected area system, which safeguards areas ancestral lands; while each community is distinct, they share of conservation and biodiversity significance, includes over 340 a common fundamental belief that their health and wellbeing reserves that together cover more than 21 million hectares, or cannot be separated from the health and wellbeing of their 21% of the State.
    [Show full text]