IC 45740 F Col Koharwal Kamal Son of Late Shri Rajes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IC 45740 F Col Koharwal Kamal Son of Late Shri Rajes 1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR (RAJ). O R D E R APPLICANT: IC 45740 F Col Koharwal Kamal Son of late Shri Rajesh Kumar Saxena, Permanent Resident of 94 PUnjabpura Bareilly (UP) Presently R/o 21/GF Vatika InfoTech City, Ajmer Road, Jaipur earlier posted at 7 Guards Att. with HQ 18 Arty Bde (Alwar) (Rajasthan) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS: 1. The Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The Chief of Army Staff, Army Headquarters, New Delhi 3. GOC-in-C, HQ South Western Command, Jaipur 4. GOC 18 Inf. Div. C/o 56 APO 5. Cdr. 18 Arty Bde, C/o 56 APO 6. GCM through GOC, 18 Inf. Div. 7. GOC HQ 10 Corps C/o 56 APO ::: APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2011 Under Section 15 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 against the Findings dated 30.6.2010 by the GCM and sentence dated 2.7.2010, as confirmed vide proceedilgns dated 16.12.2010 and promulgated on 27.12.2010 and executed with effect from 27.12.2010 ::: DATE OF ORDER: DECEMBER 13,2012 ::: PRESENT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C. JOSHI (J) HON’BLE LT GEN SUSHEEL GUPTA(A) Appellant Ex Col Koharwal Kamal present in person. Mr. Ajay Shukla for the respondents. 2 BY THE COURT: (PER JUSTICE K.C.JOSHI): This appeal is directed against the findings and sentence dated 30.6.2010 and 2.7.2010 respectively of the General Court Martial, which were confirmed on 16.12.2010 and promulgated on 27.12.2010, whereby the appellant has been held guilty of ten charges and sentenced to be cashiered, and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year subject to confirmation. The above finding and sentence were confirmed by the Confirming Authority vide order dated 16.12.2010. The brief facts leading to this appeal are: that appellant Koharwal Kamal was commissioned on 23.8.1986 and was promoted upto the rank of Colonel and appointed as Commanding Officer of 7 Guards. He took over the duties of Commanding Officer on 25.10.2007. While working as Commanding Officer, he was subjected to a Court of Inquiry and ultimately, summary of evidence was recorded. Thereafter, he was served with a chargesheet containing following 16 charges: FIRST CHARGE (Army Act Section 69) COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SEC 13(2) OF THE PRVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he at Field, between Dec 2007 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs.80,000/- (Rupess eighty thiousand only) from the Officers Mess and JCOs Mess Accouts of the same Regiment on the pretext of payment for two conversion trophies. SECOND CHARGE: (Army Act Section 69) COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SEC 13(2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he, at Field, between Feb 2008 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs.37,608/- (Rupees thirty seven thousand six hundred eight only) out of the money collected from the persons belonging to the same Regiment on account of subscription for Cable TV and Station Sainik Institutite. 3 THIRD CHARGE: (Army Act Section 63) AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDER AND MILITARY DISCIPLINE In that he, at Field, on 31 December 2007, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, improperly ordered JC-40247L Subedar Major RB Rai of the same Regiment to handover the charge of Regimental Treasury Chest to No 15361904F Hav (Clk) NV Rao, of the same Regiment, in contravention to the unit standing operating procedure on Regimental Treasury Chest dated 28 Jan 2006. FORTH CHARGE: (Army Act Section 69) COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SEC 13(2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he, at Field, between Oct 2007 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, Dishonestly misappropriated Rs. 68,814/- (Rupees Sixty eight thousand eight hundred fourteen only) from the Regimental Treasury Chest of the same Unit. FIFTH CHARGE (Army Act Section 63) AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDER AND MILITARY DISCIPLINE. In that he, at Field, between Oct 2007 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, improperly diverted a sum of Rs. 24,841/- (Rupees twenty four thousand eight hundred forty one only), the rum & cigarette allowance of troops of the same Regiment, for purchase of twenty four ceiling fans for the battalion. SIXTH CHARGE (Army Act Section 63) COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SEC 13(2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he, at Field, between Oct 2007 and Jul 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs.72,647/- (Rupees Seventy two thousand six hundred forty seven only) out of the profit accrued from Gandiv Shopping complex. SEVENTH CHARGE (Army Act Section 63 {Alternative to the Sixth Charge}) AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDER AND MILITARY DISCIPLINE. 4 In that he, at Field, between Oct 2007 and Jul 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, improperly allowed the generation of black money from the profits accrued from Gandiv Shopping Complex. EIGHT CHARGE (Army Act Section 69) COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SEC 13(2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he, at Field, between Jan 2008 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs.65,527/- (Rupees sixty seven thousand five hundred twenty seven only) out of the proceeds from the block printing venture, run by the same Regiment. NINTH CHARGE: Army Act Section 63 (Alternative to the Eight Charge) AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDER AND MILITARY DISCIPLINE. In that he, at Field, between J an 2008 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, improperly allowed the block printing venture to be run in the same Regiment without maintaining official account of its transactions. TENTH CHARGE: Army Act Section 69 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SEC. 13 (2) OF THE PREVENSION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he, at Filed, between Oct 2007 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs.23,705/- (Rupees twenty three thousand seven hundred five only) from the sale proceeds of soda water factory and from the sale of condiments, watches and quilts in the Non CSD, of the same Regiment. ELEVENTH CHARGE: Army Act Section 69 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SEC 13 (2) OF HE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. 5 In that he, At Field, between Aug 2008 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs. 26,877/- (Rupees twenty six thousand eight hundred seventy seven only), the arrears of condiment allowance for Apr and May 2008 of the troops belonging to the same Regiment. TWELFTH CHARGE: Army At Section 69 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PPUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SECION 13 (2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he, at Field, between Sep 2008 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs. 4,719/-(Rupees four thousand seven hundred nineteen only) accrued from the sale of condiments procured out of condiment allowance of the troops belonging to the same Regiment. THIRTEENTH CHARGE: Army Act Section 69 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SEC 13(2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he, at Field, between Oct 2007 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs.787,170/- (Rupees seventy seven thousand one hundred seventy only), through the sale of rations and LPG, the property belonging to the Govt. FOURTEENTH CHARGE: Army Act Section 69 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARY TO SEC 13(2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he, at Field, between Oct 2007 and Nov 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs.22,000/- (Rupees twenty two thousand only), the money voluntarily contributed by troops of the same Regiment towards financial aid to Nk Baidnath Jha (Retd) of the same Regiment. 6 FIFTEENTH CHARGE: Army Act Section 69 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT BY A PUBLIC SERVANT, CONTRARAY TO SEC 13(2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988. In that he, at Field, between May 2008 and Aug. 2008, while being the Commanding Officer 7 GUARDS, dishonestly misappropriated Rs.3,782/- (Rupees three thousand seven hundred eighty two only) through the sale of 61 bottles of Rooh Afza, meant for free issue to the troops belonging to the same Regiment. SIXTEENTH CHARGE: Army Act Section 53(b) EXACTING WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORITY MONEY FROM A PERSON. In that he, at Field, during Nov 2007, exacted, without proper authority, Rs 4,000/- (Rupees four thousand only) from No 3199541Y LNk PM Dixit of the same Regiment. In support of its case, the Department examined PW 1 Lt Col Bhaskar Bhari, PW 2 Nb Sub NV Rao, PW 3 NK Mondal, PW4 Sep Dharmendra Singh, PW5 Sub Ram Pal Yadav, PW 6 Sub Ram Raj Singh Yadav, PW 7 L/Nk PD Dixit, PW 8 Hav MK Bannerjee, PW 9 Hav Ashoke Saha, PW 10 NB Subedar Anil Kumar, PW 11 NB Sub Jagnarayan Singh, PW 12 Hav/Clk S Seenivasan, PW 13 Ex Sub Maj Ram Bali Rai, PW 14 Col Dharam Vair Singh, PW 15 Capt Sumit Kothiyal, PW 16 L/Nk Mahesh Tamang, PW 17 Guradsman Bapujee Rout, PW 18 Hav Arabinda Kumar Samal, PW 19 Col MJS Pathania, PW 20 Lovelesh Goel, PW 21 Sub Maj Ram Baran Sahani, PW 22 Jasveersingh, PW 23 Nb Sub Balbirsingh, PW 24 Hav Anand Kuamr Kashyap, PW 25 Guardsman Gobinda Chakrobortry, PW 26 Guardsman Sushant Kumar Pratihari, PW 27 Sub VK Mishra, PW 28 Col Jaydeep Yadav and PW 29 Nb Sub Ram Sahay Pal.
Recommended publications
  • Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Kochi O.A
    ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI O.A.Nos. 70 of 2011 & 118 of 2013 FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014/30TH KARTHIKA, 1936 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHRIKANT TRIPATHI, MEMBER (J) HON'BLE VICE ADMIRAL M.P.MURALIDHARAN,AVSM & BAR, NM, MEMBER (A) O.A.NO.70 OF 2011: APPLICANT: JC-459291W EX-NB SUB CLK SAJEEV MOHAN K, AGED 45 YEARS, RECORDS, THE MARATHA LIGHT INFANTRY, BELGAUM, KARNATAKA-590 009. BY ADV.SRI.RAMESH.C.R. VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY), SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 110 001. 2. THE CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF, INTEGRATED HQRS. OF MOD (ARMY), SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 110 001. 3. THE ADJUTANT GENERAL, AG'S BRANCH, ARMY HEADQUARTERS, DHQ.P.O., NEW DELHI-110011. 4. THE GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING (WESTERN COMMAND), CNANDIMANDIR (UT), ARMY PIN CODE – 908543. O.A.70 of 2011 & 118 of 2013 - 2 - 5. THE GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING (HQR), 7 INF DIV, PIN – 908407, C/O.56 APO. 6. THE DIRECTOR, RECRUITING, ARMY RECRUITING OFFICE, FEROZPUR, PUNJAB, C/O.56 APO. 7. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, WESTERN COMMAND, IS GROUP, CHANDIMANDIR (UT) ARMY PIN 904992. 8. THE RECORDS, THE MARATHA LIGHT INFANTRY, BELGAUM, KARNATAKA-590 009. BY ADV.SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN, SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL O.A.NO.118 OF 2013: APPLICANT: JC-459291W NB SUB CLK SAJEEV MOHAN K, AGED 43 YEARS, RECORDS, THE MARATHA LIGHT INFANTRY, BELGAUM, KARNATAKA-590 009. BY ADV.SRI.RAMESH.C.R. VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY), SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 110 001.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographies Introduction V4 0
    2020 www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Author: Robert PALMER, M.A. BRITISH MILITARY HISTORY BIOGRAPHIES An introduction to the Biographies of officers in the British Army and pre-partition Indian Army published on the web-site www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk, including: • Explanation of Terms, • Regular Army, Militia and Territorial Army, • Type and Status of Officers, • Rank Structure, • The Establishment, • Staff and Command Courses, • Appointments, • Awards and Honours. Copyright ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk (2020) 13 May 2020 [BRITISH MILITARY HISTORY BIOGRAPHIES] British Military History Biographies This web-site contains selected biographies of some senior officers of the British Army and Indian Army who achieved some distinction, notable achievement, or senior appointment during the Second World War. These biographies have been compiled from a variety of sources, which have then been subject to scrutiny and cross-checking. The main sources are:1 ➢ Who was Who, ➢ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, ➢ British Library File L/MIL/14 Indian Army Officer’s Records, ➢ Various Army Lists from January 1930 to April 1946: http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=army%20list ➢ Half Year Army List published January 1942: http://www.archive.org/details/armylisthalfjan1942grea ➢ War Services of British Army Officers 1939-46 (Half Yearly Army List 1946), ➢ The London Gazette: http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/, ➢ Generals.dk http://www.generals.dk/, ➢ WWII Unit Histories http://www.unithistories.com/, ➢ Companions of The Distinguished Service Order 1923 – 2010 Army Awards by Doug V. P. HEARNS, C.D. ➢ Various published biographies, divisional histories, regimental and unit histories owned by the author. It has to be borne in mind that discrepancies between sources are inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENT to the LONDON GAZETTE, N MAY, 1937 3087 Captain Trevor Edward Palmer, M.B., Indian No
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, n MAY, 1937 3087 Captain Trevor Edward Palmer, M.B., Indian No. 6676002 Warrant Officer Class II, Regi- Medical Service, late Medical Officer, British mental Quarter-Master Sergeant Reginald Legation Guard, Addis Ababa, Abyssinia. George Callingham, i6th London Regiment Lieutenant-Colonel and Brevet Colonel Edward (Queen's Westminster and Civil Service John William Porter, T.D., Hampshire Rifles), Territorial Army. Fortress -Engineers, Royal Engineers, Terri- No. 3303392 Warrant Officer Class II, Com- torial Army. pany Sergeant-Major Neil Campbell, gth Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Shapcott, M.C., (Glasgow Highlanders). Battalion, The High- Extra Regimentally Employed List, Military land Light Infantry'l(City of Glasgow Regi- Assistant, Military and Air Force Depaft- ment), Territorial Army. "ment, Office of the Judge Advocate General Warrant Officer Class I, Regimental Sergeant- of the Force. Major George Van Sanden Cooke, Ceylon Lieutenant-Colonel and Brevet Colonel Ralph Garrison Artillery, Ceylon Defence Force. Cecil Seel, M.C., T.D., Royal Corps of Lieutenant (Assistant Commissary) Thomas Signals, Territorial Army. Couzens, Indian Army Corps of Clerks, Miss Elizabeth Dunlop Smaill, A.R.R.C., Indian Unattached List, Chief Clerk, Head- . Principal Matron, and Scottish General quarters, Western Command, India. Hospital, Territorial Army Nursing Service. Captain (Deputy Commissary) Viccars Crews, Major (Quarter-Master) Edward Francis Snape, Retired, late Indian Army Ordnance Corps. ist Battalion," The South Staffordshire Regi- No. 5097328 Warrant Officer Class II, Regi- ment. mental Quarter-Master-Sergeant Thomas Lieutenant-Colonel and Brevet Colonel Charles Charles Cross, 69th (The Royal Warwick- Beechey Spencer, T.D., late Territorial shire Regiment), Anti-Aircraft Brigade, Army.
    [Show full text]
  • JCC: East Pakistan Crisis Indian Cabinet Chair: Prateek Swain Crisis Director: Alex Fager
    asdf JCC: East Pakistan Crisis Indian Cabinet Chair: Prateek Swain Crisis Director: Alex Fager JCC: East Pakistan Crisis – India PMUNC 2016 Contents Letter from the Chair…….………………………...……………………...…..3 Introduction………..…….………………………...……………………...…..5 The Situation in the Indian Subcontinent……............……………..……..……7 Setting the Stage…...………………………..……………………….……….…………7 A Brief History of Modern India..…………..……………………….……….…………9 Indo-Pakistani Relations………...…………..………………...….….……….………...10 Domestic Affairs………………………………………………………………….…...12 Current Situation……………………………………….……………………………...13 Committee Positions………..…….………………………...………………..16 2 JCC: East Pakistan Crisis – India PMUNC 2016 Letter from the Chair Dear Delegates, Namaste! I welcome you to the magnum opus of this year’s PMUNC, The JCC: East Pakistan Crisis. My name is Prateek Swain and I will be your chair for the India committee. First, I’ll introduce myself; I will be starting my sophomore year at Princeton and will be majoring in Economics or Woodrow Wilson School of Public Policy (depending on my mood when I have to declare) with a certificate in computer science. I have been debating as well as participating/chairing MUNs since my sophomore year of high school, and have carried on with these endeavors in college. Last year I was the Director for the Korean Reunification Committee at PMUNC, so I’m naturally extremely excited to be chairing this committee and have full faith that it will be a great experience for both you and me. This is certainly not my first crisis, but perhaps the one closest to my heart. Last semester, I took one of those eye opening classes at Princeton on Human Rights with Rebecca (Chair of the Pakistan committee) which set the foundation for this JCC to come into existence.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Limited War Doctrine: the Structural Factor
    IDSA Monograph Series No. 10 December 2012 INDIA'S LIMITED WAR DOCTRINE THE STRUCTURAL FACTOR ALI AHMED INDIA’S LIMITED WAR DOCTRINE: THE STRUCTURAL FACTOR | 1 IDSA Monograph Series No. 10 December 2012 INDIA’S LIMITED WAR DOCTRINE THE STRUCTURAL FACTOR ALI AHMED 2 | ALI AHMED Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, sorted in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA). ISBN: 978-93-82169-09-3 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this Monograph are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute or the Government of India. First Published: December 2012 Price: Rs. Published by: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses No.1, Development Enclave, Rao Tula Ram Marg, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi - 110 010 Tel. (91-11) 2671-7983 Fax.(91-11) 2615 4191 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.idsa.in Layout & Cover by: Vaijayanti Patankar Printed at: INDIA’S LIMITED WAR DOCTRINE: THE STRUCTURAL FACTOR | 3 To Late Maj Gen S. C. Sinha, PVSM 4 | ALI AHMED INDIA’S LIMITED WAR DOCTRINE: THE STRUCTURAL FACTOR | 5 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................... 7 1. INTRODUCTION .................................... 9 2. DOCTRINAL CHANGE ............................. 16 3. THE STRUCTURAL FACTOR .................. 42 4. CONCLUSION ....................................... 68 REFERENCES ......................................... 79 6 | ALI AHMED * INDIA’S LIMITED WAR DOCTRINE: THE STRUCTURAL FACTOR | 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This monograph is the outcome of my fellowship at IDSA in 2010- 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Sapta Shakti Command Forever Victorious
    No. 03/2019 AN INDIAN ARMY PUBLICATION March 2019 SAPTA SHAKTI COMMAND FOREVER VICTORIOUS OP THUNDERBOLT (op viJAY 1999) Captain Haneef Uddin, Vir Chakra, 11 Rajputana Rifl es Operation THUNDERBOLT was launched in June 1999 in the Siachen Sector as part of Operation VIJAY. As was the case in Kargil, Dras and Batalik Sectors, Pakistan occupied unheld heights on the Sangarh Ridge with an aim to alter the Line of Control and threaten Turtuk Sector. A company of 11 RAJ RIF was deployed in Operation THUNDERBOLT at an altitude of 18,000 feet in the Turtuk region. Th eir mission was to capture a position in the region which would facilitate the Army to monitor the movements of the enemy troops better. Captain Haneef Uddin volunteered to lead the special mission patrol consisting of one Junior Commissioned Offi cer and three other ranks. Th e party made valiant endeavours to occupy the position on night of 04 and 05 June 1999. On 06 June 1999, advancing in sub-zero temperatures along the razor sharp edge from the South-Westerly direction, the party came as close as 200 meters of the position when it was fi red upon. Captain Haneef Uddin and two other ranks received the brunt of fi re. Inspite of the grave injury, Captain Haneef Uddin, without caring for his personal safety, took position and started fi ring to pin down the enemy to extricate his team members. In the ensuing fi ring from both sides, Captain Haneef Uddin was further hit by enemy artillery and small arms fi re.
    [Show full text]
  • PLA Joint Exercises in Tibet: Implications for India
    FEBRUARY 2020 PLA Joint Exercises in Tibet: Implications for India RAJESWARI PILLAI RAJAGOPALAN PULKIT MOHAN PLA Joint Exercises in Tibet: Implications for India RAJESWARI PILLAI RAJAGOPALAN PULKIT MOHAN ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan is a Distinguished Fellow and Head of Space and Nuclear Policy Initiative at ORF. She is also the senior Asia defence writer for The Diplomat. She is the author of four books: Nuclear Security in India (2015), Clashing Titans: Military Strategy and Insecurity among Asian Great Powers (2012), The Dragon’s Fire: Chinese Military Strategy and Its Implications for Asia (2009), and Uncertain Eagle: US Military Strategy in Asia (2009). Pulkit Mohan is a Junior Fellow at ORF’s Space and Nuclear Policy Initiative. Before joining ORF, Pulkit was an Editorial Assistant with a leading development journal. She obtained her Master’s degree in International Relations from the London School of Economics. ISBN: 978-93-89622-66-9 © 2020 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from ORF. PLA Joint Exercises in Tibet: Implications for India ABSTRACT Since 2015, China has been undertaking a thorough restructuring of its military, under the leadership of President Xi Jinping. This has involved significant changes in the operational structure of the People's Liberation Army (PLA), with the modernisation and optimisation of the military to bring about better jointness and overall efficiency. This paper examines the PLA reforms as they pertain to training and jointness in the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) and the Sino-Indian border areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving Jointness in War: One Theatre < One Strategy
    Achieving Jointness in War One Theatre < One Strategy Ashish Singh* The creation of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) is a start to defence reforms. This should improve jointmanship in peacetime; however, joint wartime performance needs further reform and improvement. We face three problems: (i) historical lack of unified warfighting strategy formulation at the apex military level; (ii) the unclear division of responsibility and resources between service Chiefs and Commanders- in-Chief (C-in-Cs); and (iii) the differing natures of command and control between the three services, which manifest as differences in structural organisations. Treating India as one unified theatre can reduce these problems. It will allow the creation of a joint structure for strategy formulation at the apex level, resulting in one national strategy to guide subordinate strategy. Also, it will give ownership of all warfighting assets to a single commander who can centralise or decentralise at will, and yet not preclude formation of smaller military entities with collocated headquarters (HQ) of subordinate service formations. Examples from history support the arguments. I believe in Theatre Command; India is one Theatre. – Air Chief Marshal B.S. Dhanoa (Retd.)1 INTRODUCTION Two decades after the idea was mooted, the Prime Minister finally announced the creation of a Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) for the * The author is currently serving in the Indian Air Force (IAF). The views expressed here are his own and do not reflect that of the IAF or the Government of India. ISSN 0976-1004 print © 2020 Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses Journal of Defence Studies, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Sainik Covers
    2019 16-31 January Vol 66 No 2 ` 5 SAINIK Samachar Indian Army: Nation Before Self pic: DPR Photo Division pic: DPR Photo Division Annual Press Conference of the Chief of the Army Staff, Gen Bipin Rawat on the occasion of Army Day, 2019 at Manekshaw Centre, New Delhi on January 10, 2019 . pic: DPR Photo Division TheAdmiral President, Sunil ShriLanba, Ram CNS Nath receiving Kovind Admiral at the ‘At Christophe Home’ function, Prazuck, organised Chief of on the the Naval occasion Staff, of 72nd IndependenceFrench Navy Day, at South at Rashtrapati Block lawns, Bhavan, New Delhi in New on DelhiJanuary on August7, 2019. 15, 2018. In This Issue Since 1909 Transforming Indian Army into a 4 more Potent and Adaptive Force (Initially published as FAUJI AKHBAR) Vol. 66 q No 2 26 Pausha– 11 Magha 1940 (Saka) 16-31 January 2019 The journal of India’s Armed Forces published every fortnight in thirteen languages including Hindi & English on behalf of Ministry of Defence. It is not necessarily an organ for the expression of the Government’s defence policy. The published items represent the views of respective writers and correspondents. Editor-in-Chief Ruby Thinda Sharma Senior Editor Manoj Tuli Commands of the 8 Vice President 28 Editor Afaque Ahmad Ehsani Indian Army Inaugurates NCC RD… Sub Editors Sub Maj KC Sahu & Sub Maj Baiju G Coordination Kunal Kumar Business Manager Rajpal Our Correspondents DELHI: Col Chiranjeet Konwer (Offg.); Capt DK Sharma VSM; Gp Capt Anupam Banerjee; Divyanshu Kumar; Photo Editor: K Ramesh; BENGALURU: Guru Prasad HL; CHANDIGARH:
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Forces Module - II Structure and Role of the Forces
    Armed Forces Module - II Structure and Role of the Forces 4 Note ARMED FORCES The soldiers are faced with a variety of challenges including the difficult areas like icy glaciers, sandy deserts, mountainous jungles and the vast seas. They willingly face these challenges and are prepared to make any sacrifice for the Nation. The values of comradeship and brotherhood pervade all ranks of the army. The soldiers lay down their lives for the three Ns - Naam (name or honour), Namak (loyalty to the Nation) and Nishan (insignia or flag of the unit/regiment or Nation). They exhibit valour when fighting the enemy. There is no discrimination on the basis of caste, religion or any other aspect. This ensures team spirit and unity. They usually choose death over dishonour. The forthrightness, integrity and dignity forms the ethos of every soldier. In this lesson we shall learn about the different Commands of the Indian Army in greater detail as well as the Ethos of the armed forces. Before we look at the organisational structure we shall examine the ethos of the Indian Army. Objectives After studying this lesson, you will be able to: • explain the role and organisational structure of Indian Army; • describe the role and structure of Indian Navy and • explain the role and organisational structure of Air Force. 4.1 Role of the Indian Army The Indian Army mainly has the task to protect the territorial integrity of our country and safeguard its sovereignty from external aggression or internal disorder. The army also provides assistance to the civil administration in the event of a natural or manmade disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Military's Cold Start Doctrine
    1 Indian Military’s Cold Start Doctrine: Capabilities, Limitations and Possible Response from Pakistan By Masood Ur Rehman Khattak SASSI Research Paper 32 March 2011 Published by South Asian Strategic Stability Institute (SASSI), 36 Alie Street, London, E1 8DA South Asian Strategic Stability Institute (SASSI) 2011 2 List of Acronyms AWACS Airborne Warning and Control System ABM Anti Ballistic Missile AEW Airborne Early Warning BFSRs Battlefield Surveillance Radars C4ISR Command, Control, Communication, Computers, Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance CSD Cold Start Doctrine C4I Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence CAG Comptroller Auditor General CDS Chief of Defense Staff DGMO Director-General of Military Operations EW Electronic Warfare FATA Federally Administered Tribal FMCP Force Multiplication Command Post FPD Fire Power Demonstration HQ-9 Hongqi-9 ISRO Indian Space Research Organisation IPKF Indian Peace Keeping Force IBGs Integrated Battle Groups IAF Indian Air Force JCSC Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee LORROS Long-Range Recce and Observation Systems MBT Main Battle Tank NCW Network Centric Warfare NBC Nuclear-Biological- Chemical NCOs Non Commissioned Officers OIC Organisation of Islamic Conference PAF Pakistan Air Force RAPID Reorganized Army Plains Infantry Division SAM Surface to Air Missiles SCO Shengai Cooperation Organisation SIPRI Stockholm International Peace Research Institute UAVs Unmanned Aerial Vehicles UN United Nations US United States WLRs Weapons Locating Radars 3 Contents List of Acronyms 02 Abstract 05 1. Introduction 06 2. Indian Military’s Cold Start Doctrine- (CSD) 06 3. Indian Military’s Capabilities for the Implementation 11 Of Cold Start Doctrine 4. Indian Military Exercise from 2004-2010 14 4.1. Exercise Divya Astra- 2004 14 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cold Start for Hot Wars? a Cold Start for Walter C
    A Cold Start for Hot Wars? A Cold Start for Walter C. Ladwig III Hot Wars? The Indian Army’s New Limited War Doctrine The latent conºict be- tween nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan makes continued strategic sta- bility in South Asia uncertain. A breakdown of deterrence between the two countries would have serious consequences, including the potential use of nu- clear weapons. Since 1999 there have been two military crises involving India and Pakistan that escalated to the point where outside actors felt the need to intervene to prevent the outbreak of war. A low-level, Pakistani-backed insur- gency in Indian-controlled Kashmir adds to the tense relations between the two nations. Given the nuclear dimension involved, as well as India’s increas- ingly prominent role in world affairs and Pakistan’s domestic instability, stra- tegic and military developments on the subcontinent are of great concern to the broader international community. In response to the perceived inability of the Indian military to react to the December 2001 attack on the Parliament building in New Delhi by Pakistani- backed Kashmiri militants and the subsequent military standoff with Pakistan, known as Operation Parakram (Operation Victory), the Indian Army an- nounced a new limited war doctrine in April 2004 that would allow it to mobi- lize quickly and undertake retaliatory attacks in response to speciªc challenges posed by Pakistan’s “proxy war” in Kashmir. This Cold Start doctrine marked a break from the fundamentally defensive orientation that the Indian military has employed since independence in 1947. Requiring combined arms operat- ing jointly with airpower from the Indian Air Force, Cold Start represents a signiªcant undertaking for the Indian military.
    [Show full text]