DOCSLIB.ORG

RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2022 Updated 30 June 2021 Updated 30 June 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2022 Updated 30 June 2021 Updated 30 June 2021 Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA's publications 52eng/2020 RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2022 Updated 30 June 2021 Updated 30 June 2021 Railway Network Statement 2022 FTIA's publications 52eng/2020 Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency Helsinki 2020 Updated 30 June 2021 Photo on the cover: FTIA's photo archive Online publication pdf (www.vayla.fi) ISSN 2490-0745 ISBN 978-952-317-813-7 Väylävirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 0295 34 3000 Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 52/2020 3 Railway Network Statement 2022 Version history Date Version Change 14 May 2021 Version for comments - 30 June 2021 Updated version Foreword and text, appendices 2E, 2F, 2G, 2L, 2M, 5F, 5G, 5J Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 52/2020 4 Railway Network Statement 2022 Foreword In compliance with the Rail Transport Act (1302/2018 (in Finnish)) and in its capacity as the manager of the state-owned railway network, the Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency is publishing the Network Statement of Finland’s state-owned railway network (hereafter the ‘Network Statement’) for the timetable period 2022. The Network Statement describes the state-owned railway network, access conditions, the infrastructure capacity allocation process, the services supplied to railway undertakings and their pricing as well as the principles for determining the infrastructure charge. The Network Statement is published for each timetable period for applicants requesting infrastructure capacity. This Network Statement covers the timetable period 12 December 2021 – 10 December 2022. The Network Statement 2022 has been prepared on the basis of the previous Network Statement taking into account the feedback received from users and the Network Statements of other European Infrastructure Managers. The Network Statement 2022 is published as a PDF publication. The Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency updates the Network Statement as necessary and keeps capacity managers and known applicants for infrastructure capacity in the Finnish railway network up to date on the document. RINF data and the Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency’s register information have been used to create a map service giving information about the characteristic features of the Finnish railway network. The Network Statement 2022 follows the general European structure for similar documents, which partially differs from the structure of previous Network Statements. The Network Statement comprises the following chapters: 1 General 2 Railway network 3 Access conditions 4 Capacity allocation 5 Services and charges 6 Use of the railway network 7 Service facilities The Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency is responsible for preparing the Network Statement. A large number of experts working in different sectors of the Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency and outside the agency have been involved in the drafting process. The road and rail traffic management functions and vessel traffic services were corporatised as a state-owned limited company on 1 January 2019. The Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency purchases all traffic control services from the traffic control company Finntraffic Ltd. Helsinki, 11 December 2020 Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency Infrastructure Access and Information Services Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 52/2020 5 Railway Network Statement 2022 Contents DEFINITIONS, SIGNALS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................... 9 1 GENERAL........................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Purpose of the Network Statement ........................................................................ 13 1.3 Legal framework ........................................................................................................... 13 1.3.1 Current legislation ............................................................................................. 13 1.3.2 Legal status ......................................................................................................... 14 1.3.3 Appeals procedure ............................................................................................ 14 1.4 Structure of the Network Statement ...................................................................... 15 1.5 Validity, updating and publication of the Network Statement ...................... 15 1.5.1 Validity ................................................................................................................... 15 1.5.2 Updates ................................................................................................................. 15 1.5.3 Publication ........................................................................................................... 16 1.6 Railway sector operators and contact information .......................................... 16 1.7 International cooperation between infrastructure managers ...................... 19 1.7.1 Rail freight corridors in Finland .................................................................... 19 1.7.2 RailNetEurope .................................................................................................... 20 1.7.3 Other international cooperation. ................................................................. 20 2 RAILWAY NETWORK ..................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Extent of the railway network .................................................................................. 21 2.2.1 Limits...................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.2 Connected railway networks ......................................................................... 21 2.3 Network description ................................................................................................... 22 2.3.1 Geographical description ............................................................................... 22 2.3.2 Track gauges ...................................................................................................... 22 2.3.3 Railway traffic operating points .................................................................. 22 2.3.4 Loading gauge and structure gauge ............................................................23 2.3.5 Weight limits .......................................................................................................23 2.3.6 Line gradients ......................................................................................................23 2.3.7 Line speeds ..........................................................................................................23 2.3.8 Maximum train lengths .................................................................................. 24 2.3.9 Power supply ...................................................................................................... 24 2.3.10 Signalling systems ............................................................................................ 25 2.3.11 Traffic control systems ................................................................................... 25 2.3.12 Communication systems ................................................................................. 27 2.3.13 Train control systems ..................................................................................... 28 2.4 Traffic restrictions ....................................................................................................... 28 2.4.1 Specialised infrastructure ............................................................................. 28 2.4.2 Environmental restrictions ............................................................................ 29 2.4.3 Dangerous goods .............................................................................................. 29 2.4.4 Tunnel restrictions ............................................................................................ 31 2.4.5 Bridge restrictions ............................................................................................. 31 2.4.6 Other restrictions............................................................................................... 31 2.5 Availability of the infrastructure .............................................................................32 2.6 Infrastructure development ...................................................................................... 33 Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 52/2020 6 Railway Network Statement 2022 3 ACCESS CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 36 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 36 3.2 General access conditions ........................................................................................ 36 3.2.1 Conditions for operating rail services ........................................................ 36 3.2.2 Conditions for accessing railway infrastructure ..................................... 37 3.2.3 Licence ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sneezy Summer Forecast
    ISSUE 21 (252) • 24 – 30 MAY 2012 • €3 • WWW.HELSINKITIMES.FI DOMESTIC Finnair to transfer FOUNDED IN ST. PETERSBURG 1860 flights to Flybe 0.85ct 4379€ JS060 DAVID J. CORD The unions representing the cab- HELSINKI TIMES in crews and pilots have expressed some opposition to the deal. In- FINNAIR has announced plans to vestors were more encouraging, transfer a large portion of its Eu- sending Finnair’s share price up by Secret gardens ropean fl ights to Flybe Nordic, the almost 4 per cent. You might be stuck in the city, joint venture formed with the UK’s Finnair has been struggling but greener pastures are just a Flybe regional airline. Investors with heavy losses. In the fi rst quar- short metro ride away! Soak up have cheered the move, but unions ter of the year, Finland’s nation- some summer rays wandering have expressed caution. al airline announced a 20.4 million around one of the allotment vil- Under the plan, 12 Embraer air- euro loss on 591.8 million euros in lages dotted about Helsinki. craft, 100 cabin personnel and 120 sales. They have a plan to decrease See page 5 pilots will be transferred to Flybe annual costs by 140 million euros, Nordic, which is 40 per cent owned which includes outsourcing a va- by Finnair and 60 per cent owned riety of services, selling their ca- BUSINESS by Flybe. The pilots would eventual- tering business and decreasing ly return to Finnair to cover the air- personnel costs. 0.54ct 3356€ 093 0.27ct 2061€ JS030 line’s growing Asian traffi c.
    [Show full text]
  • Pikaraitiotie Kaupunkikehityshankkeena – Tutkimuskatsaus
    PIKARAITIOTIE KAUPUNKIKEHITYSHANKKEENA – TUTKIMUSKATSAUS Vantaan kaupunki / Miika Norppa Yleiskaavoituksen julkaisuja 2021 1 SISÄLLYSLUETTELO Sisällysluettelo ........................................................................................................... 2 Abstrakti ..................................................................................................................... 3 1. Johdanto .............................................................................................................. 6 1.1. Tutkimuskysymykset ja tutkimuskatsauksen rakenne ................................... 7 1.2. Raidehankkeiden ja kaupunkikehittämisen historiaa kasvukäytäväajattelun näkökulmasta .......................................................................................................... 9 1.3. Raitiotie- ja pikaraitiotiehankkeiden historiaa Euroopassa ja maailmalla .... 12 1.4. Suomalaisia pikaraitiotiehankkeita .............................................................. 21 1.5. Raiteet kasvukäytävinä pääkaupunkiseudulla ............................................. 24 1.6. Vantaan pikaraitiotiehanke .......................................................................... 27 2. Pikaraitioteiden vaikutukset maankäyttöön ja talouteen .................................... 32 2.1. Pikaraitiotiet sekä maankäyttö ja kaupunkikehittäminen ............................. 32 2.2. Pikaraitiotiehankkeet sekä asuntojen, kiinteistöjen ja maan arvo ................ 35 2.3. Pikaraitioteiden kaupunkikehittämiseen liittyvistä talousvaikutuksista
    [Show full text]
  • Pikaraitiotie Kaupunkikehityshankkeena – Tutkimuskatsaus
    PIKARAITIOTIE KAUPUNKIKEHITYSHANKKEENA – TUTKIMUSKATSAUS Vantaan kaupunki / Miika Norppa Yleiskaavoituksen julkaisuja 2021 1 SISÄLLYSLUETTELO Sisällysluettelo ............................................................................................................... 2 Abstrakti ......................................................................................................................... 3 1. Johdanto ................................................................................................................. 6 1.1. Tutkimuskysymykset ja tutkimuskatsauksen rakenne .................................... 7 1.2. Raidehankkeiden ja kaupunkikehittämisen historiaa kasvukäytäväajattelun näkökulmasta ............................................................................................................. 9 1.3. Raitiotie- ja pikaraitiotiehankkeiden historiaa Euroopassa ja maailmalla .... 12 1.4. Suomalaisia pikaraitiotiehankkeita ................................................................ 21 1.5. Raiteet kasvukäytävinä pääkaupunkiseudulla .............................................. 24 1.6. Vantaan pikaraitiotiehanke ............................................................................ 28 2. Pikaraitioteiden vaikutukset maankäyttöön ja talouteen...................................... 33 2.1. Pikaraitiotiet sekä maankäyttö ja kaupunkikehittäminen .............................. 33 2.2. Pikaraitiotiehankkeet sekä asuntojen, kiinteistöjen ja maan arvo ................ 37 2.3. Pikaraitioteiden kaupunkikehittämiseen
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Meluselvitykset 2012 - Rautateiden Meluselvitys
    2012 EU-meluselvitykset 2012 - Rautateiden meluselvitys EU-meluselvitykset 2012 - Rautateiden meluselvitys Liikennevirasto Helsinki 2012 Kannen kuva: Mauno Aho Verkkojulkaisu pdf ISBN 978-952-255-154-2 Liikennevirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 020 637 373 3 EU-meluselvitykset 2012 – Rautateiden meluselvitys. Liikennevirasto, liikennejärjestelmä- toimiala. Helsinki 2012. 38 sivua ja 11 liitettä. ISBN 978-952-255-154-2. Tiivistelmä Liikenneviraston hallinnoimalle rataverkolle on laadittu EU:n ympäristömeludirektii- vin (2002/49/EY) toisen vaiheen mukainen ympäristömeluselvitys. Direktiivin toises- sa vaiheessa selvityksen piiri laajeni käsittämään rataosat, joiden vuosittainen liiken- nemäärä on yli 30 000 junaa. Koko selvitettävä alue on siten Päärata välillä Helsinki– Tampere sekä Rantarata välillä Pasila(Helsinki) – Kirkkonummen asema. Tässä selvi- tyksessä on mukana ne rataverkon osat, jotka eivät kuulu muihin direktiivin mukaisiin meluselvityksiin, eli Päärata Vantaan ja Keravan rajalta Lempäälän ja Tampereen ra- jalle sekä Rantarata Espoon ja Kirkkonummen rajalta Kirkkonummen asemalle. Tässä raportissa oleva selvitysalue on pituudeltaan noin 170 km. Meluselvitys laadit- tiin käyttäen Ympäristömeludirektiivin mukaista väliaikaista raideliikennemelumallia, vuoden 2011 keskimääräisiä liikennetietoja, helmikuun 2011 väestötietoja ja huomioi- den vuoden keskimääräiset melun leviämiseen vaikuttavat sääolot. Selvityksessä arvioitiin rautatieliikenteen melua laskemalla melualuekartat ja eri me- luvyöhykkeillä asuvien henkilöiden sekä meluvyöhykkeillä
    [Show full text]
  • Historiallisen Ajan Kiinteät Muinaisjäännökset Kiinteät Ajan Historiallisen
    HISTORIALLISEN AJAN KIINTEÄT MUINAISJÄÄNNÖKSET HISTORIALLISEN AJAN KIINTEÄT MUINAISJÄÄNNÖKSET tunnistaminen ja suojelu MARIANNA NIUKKANEN MUSEOVIRASTO Historiallisen ajan muinaisjäännösten suojelu on tullut 1990-luvulta lähtien yhä keskeisemmin esille kulttuuriympäristön vaalimisessa. Niiden selvittämistä edellytetään järjestelmällisesti mm. kaavoituksen ja muiden laajojen maankäyttöhankkeiden yhteydessä. Tutkimus- ja inventointitoiminta on lisääntynyt ja tunnettujen kohteiden määrä moninkertaistunut kymmenessä vuodessa. Maastossa ja maaperässä olevien historiallisen ajan kohteiden ja jäännösten kirjo on erittäin monimuotoinen ja suurilukuinen. Keskeisiä kysymyksiä ovat, mitkä niistä katsotaan muinaismuistolain rauhoittamiksi ja mitkä ovat suojelun tavoitteet kunkin kohteen osalta. Oppaassa luodaan yleiskatsaus maamme historiallisiin muinaisjäännöksiin; niiden tyyppeihin, ajoitukseen, lukumäärään ja tutkimuspotentiaaliin. Painotus on maastossa sijaitsevien kiinteiden muinaisjäännösten tunnistamisessa ja niiden suojelutavoitteiden määrittelemisessä sekä eri kohteiden muodostamien toiminnallisten ja historiallisten kokonaisuuksien luonnehtimisessa ja ymmärtämisessä. Opas on suunnattu ensisijaisesti kulttuuriympäristön inventointien ja muinaisjäännösten suojelun parissa toimiville, mutta myös kaikille muille, joita kulttuuriympäristö ja maastosta löytyvät historialliset rakennelmat kiinnostavat ja askarruttavat. ISSN 1795-9225 URN:NBN:fi-fe200902111177 MUSEOVIRASTON RAKENNUSHISTORIAN OSASTON OPPAITA JA OHJEITA 3 HISTORIALLISEN AJAN KIINTEÄT
    [Show full text]
  • Turku Stabbings on 18 August 2017
    Turku stabbings on 18 August 2017 P2017-01 FOREWORD On 19 October 2017, the Government appointed an investigation team pursuant to Section 32 of the Safety Investigation Act (525/2011) to investigate the stabbings that took place in Turku on 18 August 2017, in which two people died and eight were injured. The investigation is of an exceptional incident as referred to in Chapter 5 of the Safety Investigation Act. The investigation team attached to the Ministry of Justice is led by Chief Safety Investigator Kai Valonen from the Safety Investigation Authority. The team consists of Mika Hatakka (PhD in Psychology), Vesa Lind (Chief Physician), Marja Nyrhinen (Head Coordinator of Immigra- tion Affairs), Olli Ruohomäki (Visiting Senior Fellow), Tarja Wiikinkoski (Director) and Kari Ylönen (Master of Political Sciences). Head of Communications Sakari Lauriala contributed to the investigation in terms of communications. Sometrik Oy and Optifluence Oy prepared a so- cial media analysis for the investigation team at their request. A safety investigation establishes the course of events, causes and consequences as well as the rescue operations and actions of the authorities. Cause refers to the various underlying fac- tors of the incident and the direct and indirect factors affecting it. Any deficiencies in regula- tions and provisions on safety and the authorities are established, if necessary. The investigation report includes an account of the course of events, the factors that led to the incident, the consequences of the incident and safety recommendations to the competent au- thorities and other actors for measures that are necessary to increase public safety, prevent new incidents, prevent damage and to enhance the efficiency of rescue operations and other actions of the authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Priority As a Competitive Factor.Pdf
    Simo Airaksinen, M.Sc. (Civ.Eng.), thesis pending, WSP Finland Ltd Virpi Kuukka-Ruotsalainen, M.Sc. (Civ.Eng.), WSP Finland Ltd Bus priority as a competitive factor Means of speeding up bus traffic have proved to be competitive factors in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area public transport. Measures to enhance speed are also financially profitable for transport providers. Traffic on the whole has increased considerably since The share of public transport in the modal split peaks the importation of passenger cars was deregulated in when public transport is faster than or nearly as fast as Finland in 1962. Since the 1960s, the number of pas- travel by passenger car. On short trips and in small senger cars and journeys made by car has quadrupled towns, walking or cycling is often an even faster way in the HMA (Sihto et al. 2003) while at the same time, of getting around than public transport. This is highly the area’s population has doubled and the number of positive from an environmental perspective despite re- jobs has risen by 80 percent. The rate of growth in ducing public transport. In terms of the competitive- passenger car traffic has outpaced that of population ness of urban regions, good, well-functioning public growth by a factor of eight; meanwhile, the number of transport allows denser development due to lower car journeys taken by public transport has grown at a rate density and lesser need for streets and roads. slower than the population. The share of public trans- The Ministry of Transport and Communications port in the modal split has fallen to a current figure Finland strives to improve the operational conditions of 39 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Investment in Railways to Generate Knowledge Transfer from Interfirm Worker Mobility
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS WORKING PAPERS 24 HANNU PIEKKOLA Transport investment in railways to generate knowledge transfer from interfirm worker mobility VAASA 2016 ISBN 978—952—476—667—8 (online) III Publisher Date of publication Vaasan yliopisto March 2016 Corresponding author Type of publication Hannu Piekkola Working Papers [email protected] tel. +358 44 0244349 Name and number of series Department of Economics. Working Papers, 24 Contact information ISBN University of Vaasa 978-952-476-667-8 (online) Department of Economics P.O. Box 700 FI-65101 Vaasa Number of pages Language Finland 42 English Title of publication Transport investment in railways to generate knowledge transfer from interfirm worker mobility Abstract An analysis using extensive Finnish microdata reveals new insights into economic returns on transport investments. Cost-benefit analysis is combined with returns to new intangible and human capital from interfirm worker mobility. Halving travel time to one hour in the Helsinki-Turku railway corridor increases commuting by 40% and yields annual returns of 30 million 2015€ in time savings and travel costs and 40-50 million € from new intangible and human capital. Two-thirds of gains are from new intangible capital, and one- third is from new human capital. These are largely explained by new jobs in the Helsinki metropolitan area. Keywords transport, railway, labor market, intangible capital, growth accounting JEL classification: H40, O47, O33, O32, J30, J21 IV Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 2 Cost-benefit analysis and changes in commuting and worker mobility ............................................................................................ 4 3 Production and new IC and HC ........................................................ 13 4 Performance-based intangible and human capital ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki–Turku-Käytävän Henkilöliikenteen Kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut Yhteysvälin Kehittämiseksi
    Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016 Hanna Kalenoja Samuli Alppi Markus Helelä Elina Väistö Helsinki–Turku-käytävän henkilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut yhteysvälin kehittämiseksi Hyvinkää Paimio Piikkiö Salo Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Paimio Piikkiö Paimio Salo Piikkiö Salo Lohja Lohja Lohja Hista Espoo Hista Espoo Hista Siuntio Espoo Karjaa Masala Karjaa Siuntio Masala Karjaa Siuntio Inkoo Inkoo Masala Kirkkonummi Kirkkonummi Inkoo KirkkonummiTammisaari Tammisaari Tammisaari Hanko Hanko Hanko Helsinki-Turku- moottoritie Helsinki-Turku- uusi ratayhteys moottoritie Helsinki-Turku- uusi ratayhteys moottoritie uusi ratayhteys Hanna Kalenoja, Samuli Alppi, Markus Helelä, Elina Väistö Helsinki–Turku-käytävän henkilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut yhteysvälin kehittämiseksi Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016 Liikennevirasto Helsinki 2016 Kannen kuva: Sito Oy Verkkojulkaisu pdf (www.liikennevirasto.fi) ISSN-L 1798-6656 ISSN 1798-6664 ISBN 978-952-317-211-1 Liikennevirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 0295 34 3000 3 Hanna Kalenoja, Samuli Alppi, Markus Helelä ja Elina Väistö: Helsinki–Turku-käytävän hen- kilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät. Liikennevirasto, liikenne ja maankäyttö -osasto. Helsinki 2016. Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016. 80 sivua. ISSN-L 1798-6656, ISSN 1798- 6664, ISBN 978-952-317-211-1. Avainsanat: nopea junayhteys, kehityskäytävä, kaukojunaliikenne, aluerakenne, työssäkäynti- alue Tiivistelmä Työn tavoitteena on ollut kuvata Helsinki–Turku-yhteysvälin henkilöliikenteen nykyti-
    [Show full text]
  • Transport System Planning in the Helsinki Region Helsinki Regional Transport Authority
    Transport system planning in the Helsinki region Helsinki Regional Transport Authority Tuire Valkonen, transport planner Contents 1. Helsinki Regional Transport Authority HRT in general 2. Helsinki Region Transport System Plan (HLJ) • The role of the plan • Background • Preparation process • HLJ 2015 policies • Examples of measures • How we cummunicate with citizens? What does HRT do? • Is responsible for the preparation of the Helsinki Region Transport System Plan (HLJ). • Plans and organizes public transport in the region and works to improve its operating conditions. • Procures bus, tram, Metro, ferry and commuter train services. • Approves the public transport fare and ticketing system as well as public transport fares. • Is responsible for public transport marketing and passenger information. • Organizes ticket sales and is responsible for ticket inspection. HRT’s basic structure (c. 360 persons) The location of the Helsinki Region in Europe HRT area and HLJ planning area Municipalities of the Keski-Uusimaa Region (KUUMA) • Land area approximately 3700 km2 • Population 1.38 million According to its charter, HRT may expand to cover all 14 municipalities in the Helsinki region. HRT Region 1.1.2012 Cities of the Helsinki 6 Metropolitan Area The main networks and terminals Nationally significant public transport terminal International airport Harbor Railway Raiway for freight traffic Metroline High way Main road Regional way In process… Ring Rail Line The west metro Helsinki Region Transport System Planning The role of the Helsinki Region Transport System Plan (HLJ) • A long-term strategic plan that considers the transport system as a whole. • Aligns regional transport policy and guidelines primary measures for the development of the transport system.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Partial Translation from the Book: Air Force Participation in the Finnish
    Partial translation from the book: Air Force Participation in the Finnish War of Independence in Year 1918 by Aarne Bremer, 1934 Translated by Seppo Koivisto, 2.2.1999; updated 18.5.1999, 15.5.2004 Chapter II. German Air Activity in Finland 1918 (pages 170-202) Initial Phase of Getting Aid (page 170) The greatest aid, that Finland received already in the preparatory stages and then during the war, came from Germany. Already in autumn 1917 arms shipments came from there to arm the home defence. During the Independence War large amounts of arms and ammunition were further bought from Germany. In February 1918 Germany agreed to send the Königlicher Preussischer Jägerbataillon Nr. 27 (of Finnish volunteers) to Finland. When the red danger was continuously worsening in Southern Finland, made Councillor of State Hjelt, a Finn that had greatest influence in Germany, his best to get aid to Finland. (Edvard Hjelt, 1855-1921, was an active and sometimes arbitrary representative of the Finnish Senate in Germany. He for instance issued a Finnish passport in false name to General Ludendorf after his resignation.) On February 11th the peace negotiations between Germany and Russia at Brest-Litovski were interrupted. By threatening St. Petersburg from Finland, Germany would force Russia swiftly for final conclusion of peace. For this Germany would not need large forces, just so much that the white Finland would win. German high command asked councillor of state Hjelt to send an urgent request for armed assistance. Councillor of State Hjelt saw, that he could fulfil this request, as he had received a telegram from Councillor of State A.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 01 03 Tilastollinen Vuosikirj
    Tätä julkaisua myy Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus Kirjasto, Siltasaarenkatu – A PL , Helsingin kaupunki Hinta euroa Denna publikation säljes av Helsingfors stads faktacentral Bibliotek, Broholmsgatan – A PB , Helsingfors stad Pris euro tieke_tvk12_kannet.indd 1 28.11.2012 19:49:52 tieke_tvk12_kannet.indd 2 28.11.2012 19:49:52 . vuosikerta ● årgång tieke_tvk12_nimio.indd 1 28.11.2012 19:50:57 Helsingin kaupunki, tietokeskus Helsingfors stad, faktacentralen City of Helsinki Urban Facts Osoite PL , Helsingin kaupunki (Siltasaarenkatu – A) Adress PB , Helsingfors stad (Broholmsgatan – A) Address P.O.Box , FI- City of Helsinki, Finland (Siltasaarenkatu – A) Puhelin Telefon Telephone + Telefax Julkaisutilaukset puh. Beställning av publikationer tfn Publications can be ordered tel. + Käteismyynti Tietokeskuksen kirjasto, Siltasaarenk. – A, puh. Direktförsäljning Faktacentralens bibliotek, Broholmsg. – A, tfn Direct sales Urban Facts Library, Siltasaarenkatu – A, tel. + Tiedustelut Tilastot ja tietopalvelu Förfrågningar Statistik och informationstjänst Inquiries Statistics and information services Sini Askelo, puh. ● tfn , [email protected] Aila Perttilä, puh. ● tfn , [email protected] Telekopio , telefax + ISSN-L - ISSN - (Verkossa) ISSN - (Painettu) Kirjapaino Tryckeri Print WS Bookwell Oy, Porvoo tieke_tvk12_nimio.indd 2 28.11.2012 19:50:57 Sisältö Innehåll Contents Esipuhe .........................................................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]