DOCSLIB.ORG

D 3.3 Scenario's and Case Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D 3.3 Scenario's and Case Studies RAIN – Risk Analysis of Infrastructure Networks in Response to Extreme Weather Project Reference: 608166 FP7-SEC-2013-1 Impact of extreme weather on critical infrastructure Project Duration: 1 May 2014 – 30 April 2017 Security Sensitivity Committee Deliverable Evaluation Deliverable Reference D 3.3 Deliverable Name Scenario’s anD case stuDies Contributing Partners UNIZA Date of Submission 07-08-2015 The evaluation is: • The content is not related to general project management • The content is not related to general outcomes as dissemination and communication • The content is related to critical infrastructure vulnerability or sensitivity • The content is publicly available or commonly known* • The content does not add new information that might be misused by possible criminal offenders • The content will not harm essential interests of the EU or MS • The content will not cause societal anxiety or social unrest • There is no need to contact the National Security Authority Diagram path 1-2-3-4-6-7-8-9. Therefor the evaluation is Public. * Although the content used is publicly available the added value of this D3.3. is the condensed information within one document, the information publisheD as such gives no neeD for a evaluation to confidential or restricted. Decision of Evaluation Public ConfiDential RestricteD Evaluator Name P.L. Prak, MSSM Evaluator Signature Was signeD 2015-10-19 Date of Evaluation 2015-10-12 This project has receiveD funDing from the European Union’s Seventh FrameworK Programme for research, technological Development anD Demonstration unDer grant agreement no 608166 RAIN – Risk Analysis of Infrastructure Networks in Response to Extreme Weather Project Reference: 608166 FP7-SEC-2013-1 Impact of extreme weather on critical infrastructure Project Duration: 1 May 2014 – 30 April 2017 D3.3 Scenarios and case studies Authors Pekka Visuri* (HI) Timo Hellenberg (HI) Verna Leinonen (HI) Andrej David (UNIZA), Zdenek, Dvorak (UNIZA) Pieter Groenemeijer (ESSL) Zdenek Jadrny (UNIZA) Bohus Leitner (UNIZA) Maria Luskova (UNIZA) Tomas Pucik (ESSL) Maria Nogal (TCD) *Correspondence author: Hellenberg International Oy Ltd, Klaarantie 4 A, 00200 Helsinki, Finland, email. [email protected], tel. +358 400 154441 ** Correspondence author: University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovak Republic, [email protected], +421 41 5136766 Date: 07/08/2015 Dissemination level: (PU, PP, RE, CO): PU This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 608166 Short Document Title DOCUMENT HISTORY Index Date Author(s) Main modifications A1.0 February 2015 Pekka Visuri, Verna Leinonen and Part A. Draft report Timo Hellenberg A2.0 March 9th 2015 Zdenek Dvorak, Maria Luskova Part A. Recommendations for content and format A3.0 April 13th 2015 Timo Hellenberg, Pekka Visuri Part A. Recommendations taken B1.0 April 8th 2015 Zdenek Dvorak, Maria Luskova, Part B. Discussion about possible content, defining the structure, Zdenek Jadrny, Bohus Leitner, preparing requested section, creating the 0.0 version, discussion Andrej David, Tomas Puscik, with practitioners Pieter Groenemeijer A4.0 April 24th 2015 Maria Nogal Part A. Recommendations and comments B2.0 May 12th 2015 Zdenek Dvorak, Maria Luskova, Part B. Completing TCD comments Bohus Leitner A4.1 May 14th 2015 Timo Hellenberg Part A. Recommendations taken and document finalized A4.3 May 19th 2015 Timo Hellenberg Part A. Recommendations taken and document finalized A4.4 June 23rd 2015 Timo Hellenberg Part A. Recommendations taken and document finalized B3.0 15th July 2015 Zdenek Dvorak, Maria Luskova, Part B. Completing TCD comments Andrej David B4.0 October 8th 2015 Zdenek Dvorak, Maria Luskova Part B. Completing TCD comments 1.0 October 9th 2015 Maria Nogal Merging Parts A and B Document Name: D3.3 Scenarios and case studies Work Package: 3 Task: 3.1 Deliverable: 3.3 Deliverable scheduled date: 15th June 2015 Responsible Partner: UNIZA 2 Short Document Title Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 6 2. Shortcuts and key terms .................................................................................................................. 7 Part A. Summer storms 2010 and winter storm 2011 in Finland .................................................. 8 3. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 9 4. Analysis of contemporary statue of the Finnish Crisis Management System ............................... 11 4.1 General framework for land transport infrastructure ...................................................... 12 4.1.1 Land transport networks ............................................................................................... 12 4.2 Historical, societal and legal aspects of the civil protection system ................................. 17 4.3 Cases which have influenced on developing of the civil protection arrangements ......... 20 4.4 Responsibilities and functions in civil protection .............................................................. 21 4.5 Civil security duties of regional and local administration ................................................. 23 4.6 Procedures in decision making .......................................................................................... 27 4.7 Situational awareness and communications in civil protection ........................................ 29 4.8 Relations between state and its citizens ........................................................................... 31 4.9 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 32 5. Description of the extreme weather event – summer storm 2010 .............................................. 35 5.1 Description of the meteorological events ......................................................................... 35 5.2 Situational awareness ....................................................................................................... 36 5.3 Management of emergency .............................................................................................. 38 5.3.1 Local and municipal level .............................................................................................. 39 5.3.2 National and governmental level .................................................................................. 40 5.4 Consequence management ............................................................................................... 41 5.4.1 Administration ............................................................................................................... 41 5.4.2 Material damage ........................................................................................................... 41 5.4.3 Social and human losses ................................................................................................ 42 5.4.4 Cascading effects ........................................................................................................... 42 6. Description of the extreme weather event - winter storm 2011 .................................................. 43 6.1 Description of meteorological event ................................................................................. 43 6.2 Situational awareness ....................................................................................................... 45 6.3 Management of emergency .............................................................................................. 50 6.3.1 Local and municipal level .............................................................................................. 50 6.3.2 National and governmental level .................................................................................. 54 3 Short Document Title 6.4 Consequence management ............................................................................................... 54 6.4.1 Administration ............................................................................................................... 54 6.4.2 Material damage ........................................................................................................... 55 6.4.3 Social and human losses ................................................................................................ 59 6.4.4 Cascading effects ........................................................................................................... 59 7. What was learned, what was improved, guidelines ..................................................................... 61 8. Policy conclusions derived from this study ................................................................................... 63 Part B. River floods on road and rail critical infrastructure in North- West Slovakia ............... 64 9. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 65 10. Analysis of contemporary statue................................................................................................... 66 10.1 General framework for civil protection ............................................................................. 66 10.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VICTOR ESTRELLA BURGOS (Dom) DATE of BIRTH: August 2, 1980 | BORN: Santiago, Dominican Republic | RESIDENCE: Santiago, Dominican Republic
    VICTOR ESTRELLA BURGOS (dOm) DATE OF BIRTH: August 2, 1980 | BORN: Santiago, Dominican Republic | RESIDENCE: Santiago, Dominican Republic Turned Pro: 2002 EmiRATES ATP RAnkinG HiSTORy (W-L) Height: 5’8” (1.73m) 2014: 78 (9-10) 2009: 263 (4-0) 2004: T1447 (3-1) Weight: 170lbs (77kg) 2013: 143 (2-1) 2008: 239 (2-2) 2003: T1047 (3-1) Career Win-Loss: 39-23 2012: 256 (6-0) 2007: 394 (3-0) 2002: T1049 (0-0) Plays: Right-handed 2011: 177 (2-1) 2006: 567 (2-2) 2001: N/R (2-0) Two-handed backhand 2010: 219 (0-3) 2005: N/R (1-2) Career Prize Money: $635,950 8 2014 HiGHLiGHTS Career Singles Titles/ Finalist: 0/0 Prize money: $346,518 Career Win-Loss vs. Top 10: 0-1 Matches won-lost: 9-10 (singles),4-5 (doubles) Challenger: 28-11 (singles), 4-7 (doubles) Highest Emirates ATP Ranking: 65 (October 6, 2014) Singles semi-finalist: Bogota Highest Emirates ATP Doubles Doubles semi-finals: Atlanta (w/Barrientos) Ranking: 145 (May 25, 2009) 2014 IN REVIEW • In 2008, qualified for 1st ATP tournament in Cincinnati (l. to • Became 1st player from Dominican Republic to finish a season Verdasco in 1R). Won 2 Futures titles in Dominican Republic in Top 100 Emirates ATP Rankings after climbing 65 places • In 2007, won 5 Futures events in U.S., Nicaragua and 3 on home during year soil in Dominican Republic • Reached maiden ATP World Tour SF in Bogota in July, defeating • In 2006, reached 3 Futures finals in 3-week stretch in the U.S., No.
    [Show full text]
  • International Trade in Second-Hand Electronic Goods and the Resulting Global Rebound Effect
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Krings, Hanna Working Paper International trade in second-hand electronic goods and the resulting global rebound effect MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 38-2015 Provided in Cooperation with: Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, University of Marburg Suggested Citation: Krings, Hanna (2015) : International trade in second-hand electronic goods and the resulting global rebound effect, MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 38-2015, Philipps-University Marburg, School of Business and Economics, Marburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/129289 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics by the Universities of Aachen · Gießen · Göttingen Kassel · Marburg · Siegen ISSN 1867-3678 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Espoon Kaupunkiradan Liikennöintiselvitys
    12 2013 Espoon kaupunkiradan liikennöintiselvitys Espoon kaupunkiradan liikennöintiselvitys HSL Helsingin seudun liikenne HSL Helsingin seudun liikenne Opastinsilta 6 A PL 100, 00077 HSL puhelin (09) 4766 4444 www.hsl.fi Lisätietoja: Tero Anttila [email protected] Copyright: Kartat, graafit, ja muut kuvat Hsl / 2013 Kansikuva: HSL / Rauni Kaunisto Painopaikka Helsinki 2013 Esipuhe Rantaradalle on laadittu yleissuunnitelmat kaupunkiraiteiden jatkamista Espoon Leppävaarasta Espoon keskukseen sekä Espoon keskuksesta Kauklahteen. Liikennevirasto on käynnistänyt rata- suunnittelutyön koskien kaupunkirataa välillä Leppävaara–Kauklahti. Käynnistynyt ratasuunnitelma ei sisällä liikennetarkasteluita, joita tarvitaan hankkeesta tehtävässä hankearvioinnissa. Espoon kaupunkiradan liikennöintiselvitys -työn tarkoituksena on tuottaa ratasuunnitelmaa varten tiedot lähi- ja taajamajunien liikennöinnistä, bussien liityntäliikenteestä sekä hankearvioinnin edel- lyttämistä liikenteellisistä tarkasteluista. Toteutuessaan kaupunkiraiteet parantavat Espoon ja Kirkkonummen suunnan joukkoliikenteen tarjontaa ja liikenteen luotettavuutta sekä luovat mahdollisuuden kehittää sekä bussien että henki- löautojen ja polkupyörien liityntäliikennettä. Helsingin seudun liikennejärjestelmäsuunnitelma HLJ 2011:ssa infrastruktuurin kehittämishankkeiden kiireellisyysjärjestyksessä seitsemäntenä mainitaan Kaupunkirata Leppävaara–Espoo, joka tulisi aloittaa vuoteen 2020 mennessä. Valtioneuvoston liikennepoliittisessa selonteossa eduskunnalle 2012 Espoon kaupunkirata on
    [Show full text]
  • Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-Party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others)
    Sustainable Governance Indicators SGI 2015 Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others) SGI 2015 | 2 Parties and Interest Associations Indicator Intra-party Democracy Question How inclusive and open are the major parties in their internal decision-making processes? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = The party allows all party members and supporters to participate in its decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are open. 8-6 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, all party members have the opportunity to participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are rather open. 5-3 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, a number of elected delegates participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are largely controlled by the party leadership. 2-1 = A number of party leaders participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are fully controlled and drafted by the party leadership. Denmark Score 8 Four of the political parties represented in the Danish parliament, the Liberal Party, the Social Democratic Party, the Social Liberal Party and the Conservative Party have existed for more than 100 years and have all regularly taken part in governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Turku Stabbings on 18 August 2017
    Turku stabbings on 18 August 2017 P2017-01 FOREWORD On 19 October 2017, the Government appointed an investigation team pursuant to Section 32 of the Safety Investigation Act (525/2011) to investigate the stabbings that took place in Turku on 18 August 2017, in which two people died and eight were injured. The investigation is of an exceptional incident as referred to in Chapter 5 of the Safety Investigation Act. The investigation team attached to the Ministry of Justice is led by Chief Safety Investigator Kai Valonen from the Safety Investigation Authority. The team consists of Mika Hatakka (PhD in Psychology), Vesa Lind (Chief Physician), Marja Nyrhinen (Head Coordinator of Immigra- tion Affairs), Olli Ruohomäki (Visiting Senior Fellow), Tarja Wiikinkoski (Director) and Kari Ylönen (Master of Political Sciences). Head of Communications Sakari Lauriala contributed to the investigation in terms of communications. Sometrik Oy and Optifluence Oy prepared a so- cial media analysis for the investigation team at their request. A safety investigation establishes the course of events, causes and consequences as well as the rescue operations and actions of the authorities. Cause refers to the various underlying fac- tors of the incident and the direct and indirect factors affecting it. Any deficiencies in regula- tions and provisions on safety and the authorities are established, if necessary. The investigation report includes an account of the course of events, the factors that led to the incident, the consequences of the incident and safety recommendations to the competent au- thorities and other actors for measures that are necessary to increase public safety, prevent new incidents, prevent damage and to enhance the efficiency of rescue operations and other actions of the authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Investment in Railways to Generate Knowledge Transfer from Interfirm Worker Mobility
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS WORKING PAPERS 24 HANNU PIEKKOLA Transport investment in railways to generate knowledge transfer from interfirm worker mobility VAASA 2016 ISBN 978—952—476—667—8 (online) III Publisher Date of publication Vaasan yliopisto March 2016 Corresponding author Type of publication Hannu Piekkola Working Papers [email protected] tel. +358 44 0244349 Name and number of series Department of Economics. Working Papers, 24 Contact information ISBN University of Vaasa 978-952-476-667-8 (online) Department of Economics P.O. Box 700 FI-65101 Vaasa Number of pages Language Finland 42 English Title of publication Transport investment in railways to generate knowledge transfer from interfirm worker mobility Abstract An analysis using extensive Finnish microdata reveals new insights into economic returns on transport investments. Cost-benefit analysis is combined with returns to new intangible and human capital from interfirm worker mobility. Halving travel time to one hour in the Helsinki-Turku railway corridor increases commuting by 40% and yields annual returns of 30 million 2015€ in time savings and travel costs and 40-50 million € from new intangible and human capital. Two-thirds of gains are from new intangible capital, and one- third is from new human capital. These are largely explained by new jobs in the Helsinki metropolitan area. Keywords transport, railway, labor market, intangible capital, growth accounting JEL classification: H40, O47, O33, O32, J30, J21 IV Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 2 Cost-benefit analysis and changes in commuting and worker mobility ............................................................................................ 4 3 Production and new IC and HC ........................................................ 13 4 Performance-based intangible and human capital ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki–Turku-Käytävän Henkilöliikenteen Kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut Yhteysvälin Kehittämiseksi
    Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016 Hanna Kalenoja Samuli Alppi Markus Helelä Elina Väistö Helsinki–Turku-käytävän henkilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut yhteysvälin kehittämiseksi Hyvinkää Paimio Piikkiö Salo Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Paimio Piikkiö Paimio Salo Piikkiö Salo Lohja Lohja Lohja Hista Espoo Hista Espoo Hista Siuntio Espoo Karjaa Masala Karjaa Siuntio Masala Karjaa Siuntio Inkoo Inkoo Masala Kirkkonummi Kirkkonummi Inkoo KirkkonummiTammisaari Tammisaari Tammisaari Hanko Hanko Hanko Helsinki-Turku- moottoritie Helsinki-Turku- uusi ratayhteys moottoritie Helsinki-Turku- uusi ratayhteys moottoritie uusi ratayhteys Hanna Kalenoja, Samuli Alppi, Markus Helelä, Elina Väistö Helsinki–Turku-käytävän henkilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut yhteysvälin kehittämiseksi Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016 Liikennevirasto Helsinki 2016 Kannen kuva: Sito Oy Verkkojulkaisu pdf (www.liikennevirasto.fi) ISSN-L 1798-6656 ISSN 1798-6664 ISBN 978-952-317-211-1 Liikennevirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 0295 34 3000 3 Hanna Kalenoja, Samuli Alppi, Markus Helelä ja Elina Väistö: Helsinki–Turku-käytävän hen- kilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät. Liikennevirasto, liikenne ja maankäyttö -osasto. Helsinki 2016. Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016. 80 sivua. ISSN-L 1798-6656, ISSN 1798- 6664, ISBN 978-952-317-211-1. Avainsanat: nopea junayhteys, kehityskäytävä, kaukojunaliikenne, aluerakenne, työssäkäynti- alue Tiivistelmä Työn tavoitteena on ollut kuvata Helsinki–Turku-yhteysvälin henkilöliikenteen nykyti-
    [Show full text]
  • Transport System Planning in the Helsinki Region Helsinki Regional Transport Authority
    Transport system planning in the Helsinki region Helsinki Regional Transport Authority Tuire Valkonen, transport planner Contents 1. Helsinki Regional Transport Authority HRT in general 2. Helsinki Region Transport System Plan (HLJ) • The role of the plan • Background • Preparation process • HLJ 2015 policies • Examples of measures • How we cummunicate with citizens? What does HRT do? • Is responsible for the preparation of the Helsinki Region Transport System Plan (HLJ). • Plans and organizes public transport in the region and works to improve its operating conditions. • Procures bus, tram, Metro, ferry and commuter train services. • Approves the public transport fare and ticketing system as well as public transport fares. • Is responsible for public transport marketing and passenger information. • Organizes ticket sales and is responsible for ticket inspection. HRT’s basic structure (c. 360 persons) The location of the Helsinki Region in Europe HRT area and HLJ planning area Municipalities of the Keski-Uusimaa Region (KUUMA) • Land area approximately 3700 km2 • Population 1.38 million According to its charter, HRT may expand to cover all 14 municipalities in the Helsinki region. HRT Region 1.1.2012 Cities of the Helsinki 6 Metropolitan Area The main networks and terminals Nationally significant public transport terminal International airport Harbor Railway Raiway for freight traffic Metroline High way Main road Regional way In process… Ring Rail Line The west metro Helsinki Region Transport System Planning The role of the Helsinki Region Transport System Plan (HLJ) • A long-term strategic plan that considers the transport system as a whole. • Aligns regional transport policy and guidelines primary measures for the development of the transport system.
    [Show full text]
  • Club • Academy • Interviews • Successes • Offer for the Partners
    2017 CLUB • ACADEMY • INTERVIEWS • SUCCESSES • OFFER FOR THE PARTNERS empire-tennis-academy.com /EmpireTennisAcademy /EmpireTennisAcademy tcempire.sk /tcempire /tcempiretrnava /empiretennis /EmpireTennisAcademy /EMPIRETennis EMPIRE TENNIS ACADEMY 2017 EMPIRE TENNIS ACADEMY 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 8 10 You can also find us on the websites and social networks web tcempire.sk empire-tennis-academy.com empireslovakopen.sk facebook /tcempire /EmpireTennisAcademy /EmpireSlovakOpen twitter /tcempiretrnava /EMPIRETennis /EMPIRESlovak Instagram /empiretennisacademy /empireslovakopen 9 20 youtube /user/ClubEMPIRETrnava/videos 4 Interview: Head Coach Vladimir Platenik 13 Tereza Mihalikova: 20 EMPIRE Slovak Open 2018, New season, new coach offer for the partners The International EMPIRE two years in the academy. This result is also Bencic (Switzerland), Lucie Safarova (Czech 6 Elina Svitolina: OFFER Tennis Academy in Trna- success of Academy‘s head coach Vladimir Republic), Kateryna Kozlova (Ukraine), An- I was surprised, what I found in Trnava 14 Players and coaches 24 Event va is on the scene more than 3 years and Platenik. drej Martin & Igor Zelenay (both Slovakia) 8 Daria Kasatkina: Ready for Top 20 of the Academy and the club calendar of the club during its activity the academy has seen out- The team of coaches was expanded by fa- and young players like Tereza Mihalikova, Re- 16 Lucie Safarova, 25 ART EMPIRE: standing achievements led by Daria Kasat- mous names such as Karol Beck, Daniel Trc- becca Sramkova (both Slovakia) and Anheli- 9 Kateryna Kozlova’s another famous member of the academy The place and moment of Jana Šindelová kina from Russia. Daria moved from 370th ka, Jaroslav Levinsky, Mislav Hizak or Martin na Kalinina, Anna Blinkova, Artem Dubrivnyy important & successful year place to 24th place ranking WTA during Hromec.
    [Show full text]
  • RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2022 Updated 30 June 2021 Updated 30 June 2021
    Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA's publications 52eng/2020 RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2022 Updated 30 June 2021 Updated 30 June 2021 Railway Network Statement 2022 FTIA's publications 52eng/2020 Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency Helsinki 2020 Updated 30 June 2021 Photo on the cover: FTIA's photo archive Online publication pdf (www.vayla.fi) ISSN 2490-0745 ISBN 978-952-317-813-7 Väylävirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 0295 34 3000 Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 52/2020 3 Railway Network Statement 2022 Version history Date Version Change 14 May 2021 Version for comments - 30 June 2021 Updated version Foreword and text, appendices 2E, 2F, 2G, 2L, 2M, 5F, 5G, 5J Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 52/2020 4 Railway Network Statement 2022 Foreword In compliance with the Rail Transport Act (1302/2018 (in Finnish)) and in its capacity as the manager of the state-owned railway network, the Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency is publishing the Network Statement of Finland’s state-owned railway network (hereafter the ‘Network Statement’) for the timetable period 2022. The Network Statement describes the state-owned railway network, access conditions, the infrastructure capacity allocation process, the services supplied to railway undertakings and their pricing as well as the principles for determining the infrastructure charge. The Network Statement is published for each timetable period for applicants requesting infrastructure capacity. This Network Statement covers the timetable period 12 December 2021 – 10 December 2022. The Network Statement 2022 has been prepared on the basis of the previous Network Statement taking into account the feedback received from users and the Network Statements of other European Infrastructure Managers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ojanko Bus Contract Tendering
    Helsinki Region Transport Helsinki Region Commuter Trains Tendering Project Kimmo Sinisalo Kimmo Sinisalo 4.10.2017 Presentation agenda Commuter train services • Current contract and operating situation • Past performance statistics Proposed tendering plan Market dialogue • Whole presentation will be published on the HSL website after the event • No questions please until the end of each section Kimmo Sinisalo 4.10.2017 Helsinki region commuter trains: Background to the current interim contract Kimmo Sinisalo 4.10.2017 Institutional setting for Finland 2017 (changes in the near future) Authority Prime Minister’s Office, Ministry of Transport Regulatory Issues State ownership Office MetropolitanMetropolitan MunicipalitiesMetropolitan (7) Finnish Transport MunicipalitiesMunicipalities (7) (7) Safety Agency Trafi ”Strategy of the owner” Rail regulatory Payment Owner Dividend Body Payment Finnish Competition HSL Helsinki Region Authority Payment Transport Authority Infrastructure Transport Payment Rent Money VR Group Ltd. Steering VR Track (maintenance VR (passenger) Payment Finnish and construction) Contract Transport Rolling Stock Agency LiVi Finrail oy Depot Stations VR Transpoint Company (Infrastructure (Traffic (freight) JKOY Manager) control) Comments: Access • VR Commuter operations is now a separate charges Private Rent Private business unit under VR Passenger division Freight Freight Operators Stations Operators StationsStations (Municipalities) Kimmo Sinisalo 4.10.2017 Background: contractual arrangements HSL negotiated direct
    [Show full text]
  • RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2021 Updated 18 June 2021
    Updated 18 June 2021 Publications of the FTIA 46eng/2019 RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2021 Updated 18 June 2021 Updated 18 June 2021 Railway Network Statement 2021 FTIA's publications 46eng/2019 Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency Helsinki 2019 Updated 18 June 2021 Photo on the cover: FTIA's photo archive Online publication pdf (www.vayla.fi) ISSN 2490-0745 ISBN 978-952-317-744-4 Väylävirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 0295 34 3000 Updated 18 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 46/2019 3 Railway Network Statement 2021 Foreword In compliance with the Rail Transport Act (1302/2018 (in Finnish)) and in its capacity as the manager of the state-owned railway network, the Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency is publishing the Network Statement of Finland’s state-owned railway network (hereafter the ‘Network Statement’) for the timetable period 2021. The Network Statement describes the state-owned railway network, access conditions, the infrastructure capacity allocation process, the services supplied to railway undertakings and their pricing as well as the principles for determining the infrastructure charge. The Network Statement is published for each timetable period for applicants requesting infrastructure capacity. This Network Statement covers the timetable period 13 December 2020 – 11 December 2021. The Network Statement 2021 has been prepared on the basis of the previous Network Statement taking into account the feedback received from users and the Network Statements of other European Infrastructure Managers. The Network Statement 2021 is published as a PDF publication. The Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency updates the Network Statement as necessary and keeps capacity managers and known applicants for infrastructure capacity in the Finnish railway network up to date on the document.
    [Show full text]