A N in Qu Iry in to D Ig Ita L H Is to Ry O F a Rt a N D a Rc H Ite C Tu Re E D Ito Rs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
An Inquiry into Digital History of Art and Architecture Editors Ljiljana Kolešnik Sanja Horvatinčić Institute of Art History Online Editions, book 11 1 MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY ARTISTS’ Contents NETWORKS. An Inquiry into Digital History of Art and Architecture 6 Ljiljana Kolešnik On Digital Art History: The Objectives and the Results of the Project ARTNET Editors Ljiljana Kolešnik and Sanja Horvatinčić 14 CASE STUDIES Zagreb, 2018 16 Irena Kraševac, Petra Šlosel Networking of Central European Artists’ Associations via Exhibitions. The Slovenian Art Association, Czech Mánes and Polish Sztuka in Zagreb in the Early 20th Century 38 Dalibor Prančević Between Art Nouveau and the Avant-Garde: The Personal (Ego) Network of Ivan Meštrović and the Map of Critical Reception of His Work during the 1910s 64 Tamara Bjažić Klarin, Nikola Bojić CIAM Network Visualisation – Detecting Ideological Ruptures in the CIAM Discourse 84 Ljiljana Kolešnik The Transition of New Tendencies from Neo-Avant-Garde Subculture to Institutional Mainstream Culture. An Example of Network Analysis 124 Sanja Horvatinčić Between Creativity and Pragmatism: Structural Network Analysis and Quan- titative Survey of Federal Competitions for Yugoslav Monuments and Me- morial Complexes (1955–1980) 166 Željka Tonković, Sanja Sekelj Duality of Structure and Culture: A Network Perspective on the Independent Cultural Scene in Zagreb and the Formation of the WHW Curatorial Collective 196 Contributors 202 Literature, archival and online sources This book is the result of the research conducted within the project ARTNET (IP- 201311/6270) supported by the Croatian Science Foundation. Between Creativity and Pragmatism: A Structural Analysis Introduction competitions for war memorials, such as the and Quantitative Survey of Federal Competitions for Yugoslav Vietnam War Memorial in the United States, Monuments and Memorial Complexes (1955–1980) Public competitions for monuments and and the growing number of memorials to memorials have always attracted the at- Holocaust victims and victims of “totali- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31664/9789537875596.06 tention of historians of art and architecture; tarianism” in Europe and North America, whether due to the formal innovations and/ have played a significant role in tackling or visionary concept they tend to generate, contemporary relationships between aes- or their role in establishing new standards thetic and political concerns.229 and procedures for the evaluation and If research on 20th-century architectur- selection of public art and architecture. al competitions – itself a relatively young Needless to say, some of the major inter- field of academic enquiry230 – is still pre- national public competitions and their dominantly focused on the big centres in winning projects, such as that for the Un- known Political Prisoner in Berlin (1953), or the competitions for monuments commem- The Nineteen-Fifties in a Divided Europe, orating victims of the Holocaust in the for- ed. Ljiljana Kolešnik (Zagreb: Društvo mer Nazi concentration camps in Germany povjesničara umjetnosti Hrvatske, 2004), 227 and Poland, have become indispensable 37–56. references in the history of the post-war 229 See, for examples: Peter Carrier, modernism, and important case studies for “Memorial fixation. The Monument for studying underlying mechanisms of Cold the murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin,” 228 War cultural politics. More recently, public Život umjetnosti, no. 64 (2001): 118–131; Peter Carrier, “Anti-Totalitarian Rhetoric Sanja Horvatinčić 227 See, for example, literature on in Contemporary German Politics (Its the Monument to the Victims of Fascism Ambivalent Objects and Consistent in Auschwitz: Katarzyna Murwaska- M eta p h ors),” Human Affairs, no. 21 (2011): Muthesisus, “Oskar Hansen and the 27–34. DOI: 10.2478/s13374-011-0004-x. Auschwitz Countermemorial, 1958–1959,” in 230 The academic interest for an ana- Figuration/Abstraction: Strategies for lytic approach to this topic appeared in Public Sculpture in Europe, 1945–1968, the late 1980s to early 1990s. See, for ed. Charlotte Benton (London: Ashgate example: Helene Lipstadt: The Experimental Publishing Limited; Henry Moore Institute, Tradition: Essays on Competitions in 2004), 193–211. For competitions for the Architecture (Princeton Architectural Pr, international memorial in Dachau, see: 1989). One of the reasons for such inter- Andrea Ridle, and Lukas Schretter, eds., est in that particular time period “may Das internacionale Mahnmal von Nandor be found in the deregulation and market Glid. Idee, Wettbewerbe, Realisirung orientation of the building constructions (Berlin: Metropol-Verlag, 2015). sector during the 1980s and the reregu- 228 See, for example: Joan Marter, lation in the 1990s through the European “The Ascendancy of Abstraction for Parliament and Council directive”. Jonas Public Art: The Monument to the Unknown E. Andersson, Gerd Bloxham Zettersten, Political Prisoner Competition,” Art and Magnus Rönn, “Editors’ Comments,” in Journal. Sculpture in Postwar Europe and Architectural Competitions – Histories and America 1945–1959, vol. 53, no. 4 (1994): Practice, ed. Jonas E. Andersson, Gerd 28–36; Robert Burstow, “Western European Bloxham Zettersten, and Magnus Rönn (The Modernism in the Service of American Royal Institute of Technology and Rio 124 125 Cold-War Liberalism.“ In Art and Ideology: Kulturkooperativ, 2013), 7–8. the West,231 the scope of knowledge on the do such surveys reveal forgotten artistic rely on the idea that the production of mon- post-war monuments in Yugoslavia. Instead specific niche of war memorial competi- and architectural projects, but they broad- uments in the period of Socialism in former of focusing on the formal aspects of par- tions is even more limited, or more tightly en our knowledge on the “history of ide- Yugoslavia was a dynamic process, defined ticular realized projects, the combination of embedded into grand-narrative schemes. as”, and open up new perspectives on the by different practices present in various lev- historiographical research and the results The history of the commissioning and pro- cultural and political circumstances that els of production, involving diverse social of quantitative and network analysis aims duction of post-WWII monuments and me- conditioned the acceptance or refusal agents with distinctive roles and dynamic to analyse what was happening ‘behind morials, especially those related to wartime of innovative concepts. Such research is, interrelations.234 These processes were di- the scenes’: What were the mechanisms events that are tasked with embodying and however, encumbered by various practical rected and managed by various federal, re- and who were the actors that enabled the transferring traumatic experience and so- obstacles. The models and drawings for public or local organizations, or individual production of the phenomenon referred cial memory, serve as imprints of cultural, competition entries have not always been stakeholders, whose actions and decisions to as ‘Yugoslav monuments’? Apart from political and social issues of the Cold War preserved, mainly because their authors on collective commemorative activities, in- their common historical and ideological era. In this regard, a comprehensive survey (especially visual artists), immersed in the cluding the construction of monuments, references, what else contributed to the of international competitions for monu- spirit of the forward-looking progress of were conditioned by available material re- notion of shared heritage associated with ments, and their role in cultural and po- modernism, were at the time often unaware sources and guided by legal regulations. these objects today?235 What were the main litical exchange and networking, could be of their importance, or simply uninterested Different models and levels of production features of awarded participants and jury especially useful. in the process of self-archiving. Another im- constantly coexisted and merged through- members in terms of their gender, profes- However, in South-Eastern Europe, the po- portant obstacle is the lack of institutional out the socialist period, resulting in various sion, place of origin, and what can this data tential for architectural competitions to be- upkeep of the documentation for compe- scales, types and degrees of formal and/ tell us about the function of federal com- come the subject of academic research titions. This issue is especially pertinent in or morphological innovation. In order to petitions for monuments in Socialist Yugo- has only recently been recognized. In for- the local context, which – largely due to understand the overall system of production slavia? One particularly important aspect mer Yugoslavia, competitions for monu- political reasons – has undergone drastic and its artistic and architectural achieve- of this analysis is the equal treatment of ments were mostly dealt with through in- infrastructural changes since the 1990s, ments, historians should – as fully and as jury members, that is, acknowledging their dividual case studies.232 More systematic being exposed to the negative social atti- comprehensively as possible – take into active role in the field of memorial produc- and problem-oriented approaches have tudes to the legacy of post-war modernism, account and understand the interactions tion, and their introduction to the (hi)story of been pioneered only recently.233 Not only especially its more ideologically overt seg- and relations between various